Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1976 Jul;26(1):15–25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.26-15

Scaling of stimulus duration by pigeons1

D Alan Stubbs
PMCID: PMC1333486  PMID: 16811927

Abstract

Pigeons were presented with a series of key-illumination time periods. During these periods two response keys were lit, one by white light and the other by red or green. White-key responses changed the color on the other key and green- and red-key responses intermittently produced food. Choice responses were reinforced at either of two intervals timed from the onset of the stimulus period. Food was scheduled for green responses during the shorter interval in some stimulus periods and food was scheduled for red-key responses at the longer interval during alternate stimulus periods. The temporal location of food in the stimulus periods was varied across conditions. Across conditions, the pigeons responded on the green key until the time at which green-key responses might be reinforced had passed; then, the probability of red-key responses increased as the time approached at which red-key responses might be reinforced. In all conditions, the pigeons, changed from green-key to red-key responses at the time that was an equal relative temporal distance from the two intervals where these responses were reinforced.

Keywords: stimulus duration, animal psychophysics, scaling, temporal discrimination, fixed interval, schedule of reinforcement, choice procedure, pigeons

Full text

PDF
15

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANGER D. The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):477–506. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-s477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BEHAR I. A method for scaling in infrahuman species: time perception in monkeys. Percept Mot Skills. 1963 Feb;16:275–280. doi: 10.2466/pms.1963.16.1.275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chung S. H., Herrnstein R. J. Choice and delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):67–74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Davison M. C. Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):247–252. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Davison M. C. Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules: number of component intervals. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Mar;17(2):169–176. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Davison M. C., Temple W. Preference for fixed-interval schedules: an alternative model. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Nov;20(3):393–403. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Duncan B., Fantino E. Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):73–86. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Herrnstein R. J., Hineline P. N. Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):421–430. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hineline P. N., Herrnstein R. J. Timing in free-operant and discrete-trial avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):113–126. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Killeen P. On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):263–269. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Killeen P. Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Sep;14(2):127–131. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. REYNOLDS G. S., CATANIA A. C. Temporal discrimination in pigeons. Science. 1962 Jan 26;135(3500):314–315. doi: 10.1126/science.135.3500.314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schneider B. A. A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):677–687. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schneider B. A., Neuringer A. J. Responding under discrete-trial fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):187–199. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Snapper A. G., Ramsay D. A., Schoenfeld W. N. Disruption of a temporal discrimination under response-independent shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):423–430. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stubbs A. The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):223–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES