Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1977 Jan;27(1):97–101. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-97

Effects of fixed-ratio sample and choice response requirements upon oddity matching1

Tore Lydersen, David Perkins, Herman Chairez
PMCID: PMC1333555  PMID: 16811984

Abstract

Three pigeons were trained on oddity matching in which either 1, 4, 8, 16, or 32 sample-key observing responses were required to turn off the sample stimuli and turn on the comparison stimuli. Oddity accuracy increased when the observing-response requirement was raised and decreased when the requirement was lowered. Next, while the observing requirement was maintained at one response, the number of responses required to the comparison stimuli was either 1, 4, 8, 16, or 32. Under these conditions, choice was defined as the comparison that first accumulated the required number of responses. In general, increasing the comparison-response requirement decreased accuracy and lowering the comparison requirement increased accuracy. The fixed-ratio observing requirements appeared to facilitate control by stimuli serving an instructional function.

Keywords: oddity matching, observing responding, choice response requirements, fixed ratio, acquisition, key peck, pigeons

Full text

PDF
97

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Berryman R., Cumming W. W., Nevin J. A., Jarvik M. E. Effects of sodium pentobarbital on complex operant discriminations. Psychopharmacologia. 1964 Nov 11;6(5):388–398. doi: 10.1007/BF00404247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Branch M. N. Behavior as a stimulus: joint effects of d-amphetamine and pentobarbital. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1974 Apr;189(1):33–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Eckerman D. A., Lanson R. N., Cumming W. W. Acquisition and maintenance of matching without a required observing response. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):435–441. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gonzalez R. C., Bainbridge P., Bitterman M. E. Discrete-trials lever pressing in the rat as a function of pattern of reinforcement, effortfulness of response, and amount of reward. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1966 Feb;61(1):110–122. doi: 10.1037/h0022878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Holt G. L., Shafer J. N. Function of intertrial interval in matching-to-sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Jan;19(1):181–186. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Williams B. A. Color alternation learning in the pigeon under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):129–140. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES