Abstract
Three monkeys were trained to emit a chain of three responses on three separate levers in a set of six levers to obtain food. The chain producing food (correct chain) was changed each day. During a trial, a press on any lever produced a feedback stimulus; a press on a correct lever produced an additional distinctive stimulus; the third correct press produced a food pellet. Test sessions in which either the food or the distinctive stimuli were removed were interspersed with baseline sessions. In tests without food presentations, the subjects acquired the correct chain rapidly, with a level of accuracy comparable to baseline. Removing the distintive stimuli for either the first or second member of the correct chain greatly retarded acquisition of that member of the chain. Removing all distinctive stimuli often reduced accuracy throughout the chain to chance level, even though food was presented following each correct chain. These results were interpreted as evidence that the distinctive stimuli presented after correct responses functioned as conditioned reinforcers. Reductions in accuracy following an omitted distinctive stimulus indicated that they were also discriminative stimuli for correct responding in their presence.
Keywords: conditioned reinforcement, repeated acquisition, heterogeneous chain schedule, stimulus control, monkeys
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- BERSH P. J. The influence of two variables upon the establishment of a secondary reinforcer for operant responses. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Jan;41(1):62–73. doi: 10.1037/h0059386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boren J. J., Devine D. D. The repeated acquisition of behavioral chains. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):651–660. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boren J. J. Some variables affecting the superstitious chaining of responses. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):959–969. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- EGGER M. D., MILLER N. E. Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus. J Exp Psychol. 1962 Aug;64:97–104. doi: 10.1037/h0040364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FOX R. E., KING R. A. The effects of reinforcement scheduling on the strength of a secondary reinforcer. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1961 Jun;54:266–269. doi: 10.1037/h0044870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- KELLEHER R. T., GOLLUB L. R. A review of positive conditioned reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:543–597. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-s543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MILES R. C. Learning-set formation in the squirrel monkey. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1957 Aug;50(4):356–357. doi: 10.1037/h0046356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mintz D. E., Mourer D. J., Weinberg L. S. Stimulus control in fixed ratio matching-to-sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Nov;9(6):627–630. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sidman M., Rosenberger P. B. Several methods for teaching serial position sequences to monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):467–478. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thompson D. M. Repeated acquisition of response sequences: stimulus control and drugs. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 May;23(3):429–436. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.23-429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]