Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1977 Mar;27(2):363–370. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-363

Conditional discrimination performance by pigeons on a response-independent procedure1

Thomas A Looney, Leila R Cohen, John H Brady, Perrin S Cohen
PMCID: PMC1333600  PMID: 16811998

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on a differential autoshaping procedure in which both components of two-stimulus sequences predicted delivery or nondelivery of food. All birds acquired the conditional discrimination. When the subjects were exposed to an extinction procedure, the stimuli maintained conditional control as long as the birds continued to peck the key. When a delay interval was imposed between the two components of a stimulus sequence using a titration procedure, the stimuli maintained conditional control up to delay values of 7 to 10 sec. These data are consistent with the view that the controlling stimuli in conditional discrimination situations are compounds of stimulus elements.

Keywords: conditional discriminations, autoshaping procedure, delay performance, pigeons

Full text

PDF
363

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ASRATYAN E. A. The initiation and localization of cortical inhibition in the conditioned reflex arc. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1961 Jul 28;92:1141–1159. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1961.tb40983.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BLOUGH D. S. Delayed matching in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Apr;2:151–160. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Berryman R., Cumming W. W., Nevin J. A. Acquisition of delayed matching in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6(1):101–107. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen L. R. Generalization during acquisition, extinction, and transfer of matching with an adjustable comparison. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):463–474. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. GINSBURG N. Matching in pigeons. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1957 Jun;50(3):261–263. doi: 10.1037/h0047252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gamzu E. R., Williams D. R. Associative factors underlying the pigeon's key pecking in auto-shaping procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 Mar;19(2):225–232. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Perkins C. C., Beavers W. O., Hancock R. A., Hemmendinger P. C., Hemmendinger D., Ricci J. A. Some variables affecting rate of key pecking during response-independent procedures (autoshaping). J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):59–72. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rescorla R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control procedures. Psychol Rev. 1967 Jan;74(1):71–80. doi: 10.1037/h0024109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Smith L. Delayed discrimination and delayed matching in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Nov;10(6):529–533. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES