Abstract
This paper reviews progress since the author's previous writings in three areas. In escape training, the preparatory-response explanation of bar holding still appears to be valid. In avoidance, the newer safety-signal version of two-factor theory has much to recommend it and readily incorporates Anger's conditioned aversive temporal stimuli formulation. Shock-density reduction is rejected as a substitute for two-factor theory. Finally, criticisms of the avoidance interpretation of punishment are answered and recent empirical data are cited in its support.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/804d3/804d3727b44bc20395c13861839cba2d868a569f" alt="83"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bdf02/bdf02fea2989045077872bd865909a8e8ba85ad3" alt="84"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78a93/78a934fa901632cc77146c1d5c03ed6ea4128b86" alt="85"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c742/7c742fd5cb7e991262e4cd968847758fdc2f8b9c" alt="86"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13a8f/13a8f22aae03e7228843a4a5b1f122b18d46d41a" alt="87"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4233/c42335c8937b844f9ca7a4e13a03e11e3b8da89b" alt="88"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17aa7/17aa75ca6a55ad9d6a636e9d5d3be5149c074550" alt="89"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5bce7/5bce7216c701845ab91f9d503ae977cfb32a72e8" alt="90"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96551/96551fa47d05d4a86e6e3cdccb299a775fff718c" alt="91"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc7b9/fc7b9fcb0b69d74c725a87c26b394819b34f2451" alt="92"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec2db/ec2db726bf58d3b0ce80781310da775d11006b96" alt="93"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afdb7/afdb7189c930403ecd88ba430d9f3ef4cba65974" alt="94"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54c1e/54c1ee5c79538dc6df0200da24d1b40fb7003a2d" alt="95"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- ANGER D. The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):477–506. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-s477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- BOLLES R. C., POPP R. J., Jr PARAMETERS AFFECTING THE ACQUISITION OF SIDMAN AVOIDANCE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:315–321. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- CAMPBELL S. L. Lever holding and behavior sequences in shock-escape. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Dec;55:1047–1053. doi: 10.1037/h0045663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chung S. H. Effects of delayed reinforcement in a concurrent situation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Nov;8(6):439–444. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DINSMOOR J. A., CLAYTON M. H. Chaining and secondary reinforcement based on escape from shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6:75–80. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DINSMOOR J. A., HUGHES L. H., MATSUOKA Y. Escape-from-shock training in a free-response situation. Am J Psychol. 1958 Jun;71(2):325–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DINSMOOR J. A., MATSUOKA Y., WINOGRAD E. Bar-holding as a preparatory response in escape-from-shock training. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1958 Oct;51(5):637–639. doi: 10.1037/h0047950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DINSMOOR J. A. Punishment. I. The avoidance hypothesis. Psychol Rev. 1954 Jan;61(1):34–46. doi: 10.1037/h0062725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DINSMOOR J. A. Punishment. II. An interpretation of empirical findings. Psychol Rev. 1955 Mar;62(2):96–105. doi: 10.1037/h0041258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis H., Burton J. A. The measurement of response force during a lever-press shock-escape procedure in rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Sep;22(2):433–440. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dinsmoor J. A., Clayton M. H. A conditioned reinforcer maintained by temporal association with the termination of shock. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):547–552. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrnstein R. J., Hineline P. N. Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):421–430. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Herrnstein R. J. Method and theory in the study of avoidance. Psychol Rev. 1969 Jan;76(1):49–69. doi: 10.1037/h0026786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hineline P. N. Negative reinforcement without shock reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3):259–268. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keehn J. D. Is bar-holding with negative reinforcement preparatory or perseverative. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):461–465. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leitenberg H. Is time-out from positive reinforcement an aversive event? A review of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull. 1965 Dec;64(6):428–441. doi: 10.1037/h0022657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lolordo V. M. Positive conditioned reinforcement from aversive situations. Psychol Bull. 1969 Sep;72(3):193–203. doi: 10.1037/h0027907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthews T. J., McHugh T. G., Carr L. D. Pavlovian and instrumental determinants of response suppression in the pigeon. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1974 Sep;87(3):500–506. doi: 10.1037/h0036992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- RENNER K. E. DELAYED OF REINFORCEMENT: A HISTORICAL REVIEW. Psychol Bull. 1964 May;61:341–361. doi: 10.1037/h0048335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- SIDMAN M. Reduction of shock frequency as reinforcement for avoidance behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:247–257. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]