ABSTRACT
Pharmaceutical waste has been recognized as an emerging contaminant that is increasingly detected in the environment and may pose ecotoxicological risks. This review aims to describe the global development of research on pharmaceutical waste within the field of ecotoxicology and to examine the role of insects in trophic food-chain exposure pathways. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Scopus database, comprising 1,051 articles published between 2010 and 2025. The results show a consistent upward trend in publications, with pharmaceutical ecotoxicology research predominantly focused on aquatic environments, environmental risk assessment, contaminant monitoring, and toxicological evaluation. Keyword analysis further indicates that terrestrial exposure pathways remain comparatively less emphasized within the current bibliometric landscape. The narrative review indicates that pharmaceutical waste can accumulate in organisms and be transferred through the food chain, leading to various physiological and systemic toxic effects, even at low environmental concentrations. In this context, insects play a strategic role as mediators of trophic exposure. Hermetia illucens is relevant in waste management and biotransformation processes, while Drosophila melanogaster is a well-established model organism for investigating physiological and molecular responses to pharmaceutical compound exposure. Thus, this review discusses the potential of an insect-based ecotoxicology framework in which H. illucens may serve as a bioconversion model for waste processing and D. melanogaster as a mechanistic model for toxicological studies. We also highlight the need for a more integrative ecotoxicological approach to pharmaceutical waste that explicitly considers insect involvement and food chain – based exposure pathways.
KEYWORDS: Pharmaceutical waste, ecotoxicology, trophic transfer, insects, Hermetia illucens, Drosophila melanogaster
Introduction
Pharmaceutical waste has been identified as an emerging contaminant that is receiving increasing attention in the field of ecotoxicology [1–3]. This waste is generated across the entire pharmaceutical lifecycle, from industrial manufacturing and healthcare delivery to veterinary practice, agricultural use, and household consumption. Once released, pharmaceutical residues can enter the environment through sewage systems, soil, and surface or groundwater [4–6]. Their presence raises serious concerns because pharmaceutical compounds are specifically designed to be biologically active at low concentrations, making them capable of exerting toxic effects even on non-target organisms [6,7]. Moreover, their long-term persistence and accumulation in the environment may contribute to the development of antibiotic resistance, endocrine disruption, and the degradation of overall ecosystem quality [3,6,7].
Ecotoxicology is a branch of environmental toxicology that examines the effects of chemical contaminants on organisms and their interactions within ecosystems. To date, research in pharmaceutical ecotoxicology has predominantly focused on aquatic ecosystems, largely employing fish [8], algae, and crustaceans as test organisms [9]. This emphasis reflects the fact that aquatic systems are major sinks for pharmaceutical residues. While such an approach is highly relevant, the dominance of aquatic models has resulted in a limited understanding of pharmaceutical impacts on terrestrial organisms. In terrestrial ecotoxicology, several non-aquatic organisms, including soil invertebrates and pollinators, have also been used to evaluate the ecological impacts of environmental contaminants because of their important roles in ecosystem functioning and trophic interactions [10,11]. Insects, despite their extensive use as model organisms in biomedical research and toxicology, remain comparatively underrepresented in pharmaceutical ecotoxicology studies. Insects are ecologically relevant because they contribute to decomposition processes, trophic interactions, and contaminant transfer within terrestrial ecosystems, while also serving as experimental systems for investigating physiological and molecular responses to environmental contaminants.
In this context, insects offer considerable potential for advancing research in pharmaceutical ecotoxicology. The black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) has been widely investigated as a bioconversion agent capable of processing diverse organic wastes, including those containing antibiotic residues and other pharmaceutical compounds [12–14]. Its ability to tolerate and transform contaminants makes this species a promising candidate for bioremediation-oriented studies. Meanwhile, the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster), a well-established model organism in genetics and toxicology, provides a powerful platform for evaluating the physiological, biochemical, and molecular effects of pharmaceutical exposure. These include impacts on survival, reproduction, oxidative stress, and gene expression, which are relevant endpoints for ecotoxicological assessment [15,16].
This article integrates bibliometric and narrative review approaches to provide a comprehensive overview of pharmaceutical ecotoxicology research. The bibliometric analysis maps the global development of the field, identifying publication trends, influential contributors, and existing research gaps. Subsequently, the narrative review explores the role of insects, particularly H. illucens and D. melanogaster, as potentially useful and complementary models in pharmaceutical ecotoxicology. Through this integrated approach, the article discusses how insects may contribute to pharmaceutical ecotoxicology research through potential applications in environmental bioremediation and toxicological assessment, thereby complementing conventional models used to evaluate pharmaceutical contamination.
Methods
2.1. Data collection
This study applies bibliometric methods to review the literature related to pharmaceutical ecotoxicology (Figure 1). Several databases, including Scopus, Web of Science (WoS), and Google Scholar, are commonly used to provide bibliographic and citation records for bibliometric studies [17]. However, in the present study, Scopus was selected as the sole data source for the bibliometric analysis because of its extensive literature coverage, high-quality metadata, and compatibility with bibliometric analysis tools [18,19].
Figure 1.

Overview of the literature search and bibliometric workflow.
Data collection was conducted on 13 December 2025, using the search string TITLE-ABS-KEY (‘Ecotoxicology’ AND ‘Pharmaceutical’), resulting in 1,588 documents. The data were filtered to publications from 2010 to 2025, English-language documents, journal source types, final-stage publications, and article document types. Considering the broad range of scientific disciplines, data filtering involved eleven subject areas: Environmental Science; Medicine; Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics; Chemistry; Agricultural and Biological Sciences; Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; Health Professions; Veterinary; Materials Science; and Chemical Engineering. The final dataset consisted of 1,051 documents.
2.2. Data cleaning
After the initial data collection, the Scopus database was downloaded and cleaned using OpenRefine™ (version 3.9.3) to minimize bias caused by inconsistencies and word duplication. This process aimed to improve the quality of the units of analysis by identifying spelling variations and merging items that represent the same concept. For example, ecotoxicologia and ecotoxicity were combined into ecotoxicology, micropollutant into micropollutants, and waste water into wastewater. The cleaned dataset was then exported in a format compatible with the bibliometric software and prepared for analysis [19,20].
2.3. Data analysis
The cleaned data from OpenRefine™ were then exported to three main applications. VOSviewer version 1.6.20 (Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands) was used to map and visualize bibliometric networks. These visualizations, often referred to as maps, enable network analyses such as co-authorship, co-occurrence, and co-citation, which can be applied to authors, publication sources, countries, and keywords. RStudio version 2025.09.2.0 (Posit Software, PBC, Boston, MA, USA) was used for additional data processing and visualization. Excel 365 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) was used to refine and customize graphical outputs [18,20–23].
2.4. Narrative review methodology
Literature for the narrative review was retrieved from Scopus and PubMed using keyword combinations related to pharmaceutical waste, pharmaceutical exposure, ecotoxicology, trophic transfer, bioaccumulation, Hermetia illucens, and Drosophila melanogaster. Additional relevant articles were identified through manual screening of reference lists.
Studies discussing pharmaceutical exposure, trophic transfer, toxicological responses, bioaccumulation, and insect-based model systems were included, whereas studies focused exclusively on therapeutic or clinical applications were excluded. To distinguish ecotoxicological evidence from pharmacological or biomedical studies, priority was given to investigations that used environmentally relevant exposure concentrations (i.e. within ranges reported in environmental monitoring data) or that explicitly assessed ecologically meaningful endpoints such as mortality, development, reproduction, behaviour, or trophic transfer. Studies using substantially higher, non-environmental concentrations without ecotoxicological framing were noted but given less weight in formulating conclusions. Recent studies published within the last five years were prioritized, although earlier studies were also included when considered directly relevant to the review objectives. Final article selection was based on title, abstract, and full-text screening.
Results and discussion
3.1. General dataset information
Table 1 presents an overview of the bibliometric dataset analysed in this study. A total of 1,051 articles published between 2010 and 2025 were retrieved from the Scopus database, originating from 175 scientific journals and involving 4,402 authors. The average number of citations was 47.1 per article, with an annual publication growth rate of 6.68%. Overall, these articles cited 6,951 references and included 1,956 author keywords.
Table 1.
Summary of publication data used in the bibliometric analysis between 2010 and 2025.
| Description | Results |
|---|---|
| MAIN INFORMATION ABOUT DATA | |
| Timespan | 2010:2025 |
| Sources (Journals, Books, etc) | 175 |
| Documents | 1051 |
| Annual growth rate % | 6.68 |
| Document average age (years) | 6.45 |
| Average citations per document | 47.1 |
| References | 6951 |
| DOCUMENT CONTENTS | |
| Keywords Plus (ID) | 10559 |
| Author’s keywords (DE) | 1956 |
| AUTHORS | |
| Authors | 4402 |
| Authors of single-authored documents | 0 |
| AUTHORS COLLABORATION | |
| Single-authored documents | 0 |
| Co-authors per document | 11.7 |
| International co-authorships % | 32.92 |
| DOCUMENT TYPES | |
| Journal Article | 1051 |
3.2. Publication trends
The development of research on pharmaceutical waste in ecotoxicology is reflected in changes in the number of annual publications during the period from 2010 to 2025 (Figure 2). Although publication output was relatively limited during the early years, research activity increased substantially over time and remained consistently high in recent years. Overall, this pattern aligns with the annual publication growth rate of 6.68%, indicating growing scientific attention towards pharmaceutical waste as an emerging environmental concern in ecotoxicology studies.
Figure 2.

Trend in the number of annual publications related to pharmaceutical waste in ecotoxicology studies during the period 2010–2025.
The increasing publication trend may be associated with greater awareness of the chronic biological effects of pharmaceutical contaminants, even at environmentally relevant concentrations [24]. In addition, advances in analytical detection technologies and environmental monitoring strategies have facilitated the identification of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater and aquatic ecosystems, thereby contributing to the expansion of research activity in this field [25].
3.3. Country contributions
Country scientific production was analysed in Biblioshiny using author affiliation data extracted from bibliographic records. The analysis was based on author appearances by country affiliations, in which each publication was attributed to all countries represented by the affiliations of contributing authors [26]. Overall, 79 countries contributed to pharmaceutical waste research in ecotoxicology during the 2010–2025 period (Figure 3). The publication distribution map (Figure 3(A)) shows that darker shades represent a higher number of publications. Based on this visualization, the five countries with the highest contributions are Spain (n = 537), Portugal (n = 502), China (n = 496), the United States (n = 446), and Brazil (n = 437).
Figure 3.

Country contributions to pharmaceutical waste research in ecotoxicology. (A) Geographic distribution map of publications based on the number of documents per country, where darker shades indicate a higher number of publications. (B) Trend in the annual number of publications of the highest-contributing countries during the 2010–2025 period.
The annual publication trends of the highest-contributing countries are shown in Figure 3(B). Spain and Portugal exhibited a relatively stable pattern of increasing publications throughout the observation period, reflecting a consistent research focus on pharmaceutical waste as a key issue in ecotoxicology, particularly in aquatic systems [27,28]. Meanwhile, China, the United States, and Brazil showed a more gradual pattern of increase, reflecting the expanding global attention to pharmaceutical waste in ecotoxicology [29–31]. The predominance of Spain and Portugal may be associated with the strong research emphasis on environmental pollution, wastewater management, and aquatic ecotoxicology within European scientific networks. European countries have been actively involved in monitoring emerging contaminants, including pharmaceutical residues, particularly in wastewater and aquatic environments, which may have contributed to the high research output observed in this field [32].
3.4. Top journals
Overall, 175 scientific journals contributed publications related to pharmaceutical waste and ecotoxicology during the period 2010–2025. To identify the main publication sources in this field, further analysis focused on the top 10 journals based on the number of articles published. The distribution of journal productivity is shown in Figure 4, while a breakdown of the number of publications (n) and total citations (TC) is presented in Table 2.
Figure 4.

Distribution of the top 10 journals based on the number of publications related to pharmaceutical waste in ecotoxicology studies during the period 2010–2025.
Table 2.
Top 10 journals contributing publications related to pharmaceutical waste and ecotoxicology during the period 2010–2025.
| Sources | Documents | Total Citations |
|---|---|---|
| SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT | 134 | 8941 |
| CHEMOSPHERE | 96 | 4843 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH | 92 | 3619 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY | 87 | 2491 |
| ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY | 62 | 2854 |
| AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY | 57 | 3463 |
| JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS | 49 | 3300 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION | 42 | 2106 |
| WATER RESEARCH | 34 | 3904 |
| ECOTOXICOLOGY | 26 | 871 |
The analysis identified Science of the Total Environment, Chemosphere, and Environmental Science and Pollution Research as the leading publication sources in this field, based on publication output and citation impact. Other influential journals included Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, Aquatic Toxicology, and Journal of Hazardous Materials. These journals predominantly focus on environmental pollution and aquatic toxicology, indicating that pharmaceutical ecotoxicology research has largely developed within water-based environmental frameworks.
3.5. Reference co-citation analysis
Reference co-citation analysis was performed to identify influential studies that form the intellectual foundation of pharmaceutical waste research in ecotoxicology. The analysis generated a network of highly cited references grouped into several clusters (Figure 5), indicating the presence of different thematic areas within the literature.
Figure 5.

Reference co-citation network of highly cited studies in pharmaceutical waste and ecotoxicology research during 2010–2025. Node size represents co-citation frequency, while links indicate co-citation relationships between references. Colors represent clusters of related studies.
Several references occupy central positions in the network, particularly studies by Boxall et al. Aus der Beek et al. Daughton et al. Bradford et al. Andreozzi et al. and Brodin et al. which are frequently co-cited in the literature and mainly address the occurrence, environmental distribution, and ecological risks of pharmaceutical contaminants in the environment. Studies occupying central nodes are predominantly concerned with environmental biology, hydrology, and the regulatory dimensions of pharmaceutical contaminants.
3.6. Most influential authors
Analysis of authorship in research related to pharmaceutical waste and ecotoxicology revealed the involvement of 4,402 authors during the period 2010–2025. The top ten authors, as presented in Table 3, demonstrate outstanding contributions in terms of both productivity and citation rates. These authors generally contribute to studies on the occurrence and impacts of pharmaceutical waste in the environment, including research on toxicity and bioaccumulation in both aquatic and non-aquatic organisms [33–37].
Table 3.
Most productive and highly cited authors in studies on the ecotoxicology of pharmaceutical waste.
| Authors | Documents | Citations |
|---|---|---|
| NUNES, B. ANDRÉ FERNANDES DE JESUS DA SILVA | 29 | 1236 |
| BARCELÓ, DAMIÀ À. | 22 | 2094 |
| SOARES, AMADEU M.V.M. | 20 | 733 |
| BROOKS, BRYAN W. | 16 | 767 |
| WONG, BOB B.M. | 15 | 439 |
| BRODIN, TOMAS | 14 | 475 |
| FICK, JERKER BERGLUND | 13 | 637 |
| OWEN, STEWART F. | 13 | 460 |
| SUMPTER, JOHN P. | 13 | 1153 |
| ANTUNES, S. C. | 12 | 687 |
Several authors with a high number of publications and citation counts, such as Damià A. Barceló (n = 22; TC = 2,094) and John P. Sumpter (n = 13; TC = 1,153), are closely associated with research on pharmaceutical contaminants as emerging pollutants, including studies addressing the long-term effects of low-dose exposure [38–41]. Meanwhile, authors such as B. André Fernandes de Jesus da Silva Nunes (n = 29; TC = 1,236) and Amadeu M.V.M. Soares (n = 20; TC = 733) frequently engage in experimental studies evaluating the physiological and molecular responses of organisms to exposure to pharmaceutical compounds and their mixtures [42–44]. This diversity of research approaches reflects the broad scope of pharmaceutical ecotoxicology that has developed over the last two decades, and the disciplinary breadth underscores the requirement of multidisciplinary collaboration across these fields.
Keyword analysis
Keyword co-occurrence analysis was performed to identify dominant research themes, conceptual relationships, and emerging directions in pharmaceutical ecotoxicology studies [45,46]. The co-occurrence network was generated using VOSviewer based on author keywords extracted from the analysed documents. A minimum occurrence threshold of 7 was applied to a total of 1,956 keywords, resulting in 118 keywords that met the criteria for visualization and network analysis (Figure 6) [46,47]. The size of each node represents keyword occurrence frequency, whereas the distance and connecting lines indicate the strength of conceptual relationships among terms within the network.
Figure 6.

Map of keyword co-occurrence in pharmaceutical waste research in ecotoxicology studies (2010–2025).
Table 4 lists the top keywords ranked according to occurrence frequency and total link strength. The most frequent keywords were pharmaceuticals, ecotoxicology, environmental risk, risk assessment, and wastewater, with 466, 354, 106, 67, and 61 occurrences and total link strengths of 1008, 770, 250, 157, and 165, respectively. Other highly associated keywords included emerging contaminants, fish, biomarkers, toxicity, and antibiotics. In addition, terms such as oxidative stress, surface water, and zebrafish were also observed within the co-occurrence network. Collectively, these patterns indicate that pharmaceutical ecotoxicology research is strongly associated with contaminant occurrence, environmental risk assessment, and toxicological evaluation in aquatic environments [48–52]. This pattern also reflects the broad scope of the bibliometric dataset, which includes studies addressing environmental occurrence, chemical monitoring, risk assessment, and biological effects of pharmaceutical contaminants across different environmental systems.
Table 4.
Most frequently used keywords ranked by total link strength.
| Keyword | Occurrences | Total link strength |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmaceuticals | 466 | 1008 |
| Ecotoxicology | 354 | 770 |
| Environmental risk | 106 | 250 |
| Wastewater | 61 | 165 |
| Risk assessment | 67 | 157 |
| Emerging contaminants | 55 | 148 |
| Fish | 53 | 128 |
| Biomarkers | 47 | 117 |
| Toxicity | 55 | 111 |
| Antibiotics | 49 | 110 |
Several terms related to terrestrial contexts and environmental transformation processes, including soil, transformation products, and anaerobic digestion, were also identified within the network, although with lower occurrences and weaker link strengths compared with aquatic-related terms. These findings indicate that terrestrial environmental pathways are present but remain less developed within the current pharmaceutical ecotoxicology landscape, while aquatic-oriented approaches continue to dominate the current bibliometric structure.
3.8. Insect-based pharmaceutical ecotoxicology
The bibliometric patterns identified in this study suggest that pharmaceutical ecotoxicology research has largely developed within aquatic environmental frameworks, while terrestrial exposure systems remain comparatively less emphasized. This distribution highlights the need for further exploration of contaminant transfer processes occurring within terrestrial ecosystems and food webs.
In this context, insects represent ecologically relevant organisms because of their involvement in decomposition, waste conversion, and trophic interactions that may contribute to contaminant transfer in terrestrial environments. Based on this bibliometric evidence, the present narrative review subsequently focuses on two insect models with complementary ecological and mechanistic relevance. H. illucens was selected because of its established role in organic waste bioconversion and contaminant processing [12,53], whereas D. melanogaster was selected due to its extensive application as a mechanistic model for evaluating physiological and molecular responses to pharmaceutical exposure [15,54,55]. Accordingly, the following sections extend the bibliometric findings into a narrative discussion of insect-mediated approaches in terrestrial pharmaceutical ecotoxicology.
Nevertheless, it is important to note that other terrestrial models, such as Eisenia fetida (an OECD standard for soil toxicity) and bees (Apis mellifera), are also highly relevant to pharmaceutical ecotoxicology and should be considered alongside the insect models proposed here in a fully integrated framework.
3.9. Pharmaceutical waste in the food chain
Pharmaceutical waste has been identified as an emerging contaminant that is frequently detected in the environment and has the potential to enter the food chain [6,56,57]. Persistent pharmaceutical compounds can accumulate in organisms at lower trophic levels through exposure to contaminated water, sediment, or food sources, including invertebrates and insects [58,59]. This process allows for initial bioaccumulation, which underlies the transfer of biologically active compounds within trophic networks.
Once accumulated in prey, pharmaceutical residues do not stop; ingestion by predators completes a trophic relay that can sustain and even amplify biological exposure well beyond what single-organism assays would suggest [60–63]. This fact is consequential at environmentally relevant, chronically low concentrations, where effects may be subtle but cumulative across generations. Thus, understanding the dynamics of bioaccumulation and transfer is crucial for evaluating the long-term implications of pharmaceutical waste exposure across different trophic levels.
3.10. Toxic effects on organisms and biological systems
Unlike conventional pollutants, pharmaceuticals are by design biologically active at trace concentrations, a property that makes them uniquely problematic for non-target organisms, including more complex biological systems, which encounter them without the evolutionary pressure to tolerate their specific mechanisms of action [64–67]. At the physiological level, pharmaceutical compounds can affect reproduction, growth, and development, and induce oxidative stress characterized by increased production of reactive oxygen species and alterations in antioxidant defence systems [68–70]. These effects are often observed even at relatively low environmental concentrations, raising concerns about long-term chronic impacts.
In addition to physiological effects, pharmaceutical waste can also induce systemic disruptions, including alterations in metabolic regulation, hormonal signalling, and immune responses [71,72]. Several classes of pharmaceutical compounds, such as antibiotics, analgesics, and endocrine-active drugs, have been reported to disrupt energy homoeostasis, endocrine function, and immune activity in exposed organisms [73–77]. These findings indicate that the impacts of pharmaceutical waste are not limited to localized or acute effects but may also influence biological functions in an integrated manner, highlighting the importance of evaluating these effects using model organisms capable of capturing systemic responses.
3.11. Insects as dual-role models in trophic exposure studies: Hermetia illucens and Drosophila melanogaster
The framing of insect involvement in pharmaceutical ecotoxicology has lagged behind empirical necessity, a gap best illustrated by examining two fly species whose contrasting ecological roles make them indispensable (Figure 7). One species frequently reported is H. illucens, which plays a key role in the management and bioconversion of organic waste [78–80]. Previous studies have shown that H. illucens is capable of processing waste containing residues of pharmaceutical compounds, potentially reducing pollutant loads through biological mechanisms [12,81]. With this capacity, H. illucens represents a relevant candidate for exploration as an insect-based approach to pharmaceutical waste management, particularly at upstream stages before pollutants enter broader ecological systems.
Figure 7.

Roles of Hermetia illucens and Drosophila melanogaster in pharmaceutical ecotoxicology.
In contrast, D. melanogaster is a well-established model organism in genetics and toxicology and is widely used to evaluate the physiological, biochemical, and molecular impacts of chemical compound exposure [82–84]. Pharmaceutical compound exposure in Drosophila has been reported to affect various biological parameters, including survival, reproduction, oxidative stress, and the regulation of gene expression related to metabolism and stress responses [85–88]. The high degree of conservation of biological pathways and drug targets, with approximately 75% of human disease-related genes conserved, combined with the ease of experimental manipulation and the extensive genetic toolkit available (e.g. GAL4/UAS, CRISPR), makes D. melanogaster an effective toxicological sentinel for assessing systemic impacts of pharmaceutical waste exposure, including chronic low-dose exposures that may be relevant to organisms at higher trophic levels.
Beyond its value as a toxicological model, D. melanogaster also provides mechanistic insights into the biological effects of pharmaceutical exposure. For instance, exposure to acetaminophen (paracetamol) has been reported to alter life-history traits such as fecundity, lifespan, and locomotor activity, with effects that may persist across generations [89]. In addition, experimental models have demonstrated that acetaminophen exposure can induce oxidative stress through increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and depletion of antioxidant defences [90]. Exposure to other pharmaceutical compounds, such as fluoxetine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), has also been reported to affect the serotonergic signalling pathway in Drosophila, which plays an important role in regulating behaviour and physiological functions [91].
The relevance of D. melanogaster as a toxicological model extends to the conservation of the underlying molecular machinery. Many detoxification pathways in D. melanogaster are evolutionarily conserved with those of higher organisms, including cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes that play a key role in xenobiotic metabolism and the biotransformation of pharmaceutical compounds. Insecticide resistance in Drosophila demonstrates that constitutive activation of the Nrf2/CncC pathway can upregulate CYP450 genes [92]. CncC-mediated redox signalling helps fight oxidative insults and regulates redox balance, including due to pollutant [93,94]. Furthermore, the well-characterized nervous system of Drosophila allows the assessment of neurobehavioral endpoints, including locomotor activity, climbing ability, and feeding behaviour, which serve as sensitive indicators of neurotoxicity and systemic physiological disruption following chemical exposure [95].
Conceptually, the combined use of H. illucens and D. melanogaster represents a continuum of roles in pharmaceutical ecotoxicology. H. illucens functions primarily in the management and reduction of pharmaceutical waste at the environmental level, while Drosophila enables further evaluation of the biological and molecular consequences of exposure to these compounds. This insect-based approach has the potential to address limitations associated with conventional models, which have been largely dominated by aquatic organisms, and to open new opportunities for developing a more integrative, cross-trophic, and ecologically relevant framework for pharmaceutical ecotoxicology that better reflects pollution dynamics in real-world environments.
Conclusion
Bibliometric analysis indicates that research on pharmaceutical waste in ecotoxicology has continued to increase globally during the period 2010–2025, with a predominance of publications focusing on aquatic environments and aquatic organisms. Keyword patterns and research themes indicate that studies examining exposure pathways through terrestrial food chains remain relatively limited.
The narrative review reveals that pharmaceutical waste can accumulate in organisms and be transferred across trophic levels, leading to a range of physiological and systemic toxic effects, including oxidative stress and disruption of biological regulation, even at low environmental concentrations. However, most of the available evidence continues to originate from aquatic systems.
Based on these findings, insects have the potential to serve as valuable non-aquatic models for studying trophic exposure to pharmaceutical waste, and we propose an insect-based ecotoxicology framework in which H. illucens acts as a bioconversion model for waste processing and D. melanogaster as a mechanistic toxicological model. Fly-based approaches, already trusted in mechanistic studies across genetics, ageing, and neuroscience, stand ready to assume an equivalent role in ecotoxicology and help broaden our understanding of pharmaceutical waste exposure dynamics. For that, deliberate multidisciplinary collaboration, integrating ecology, entomology, molecular biology, environmental toxicology, and waste management, will be essential to more fully account for the trophic and terrestrial dimensions of the problem.
Acknowledgments
We express our sincere gratitude to the members of the Unhas Fly Research Group (UFRG) for their critical reading and careful evaluation of the manuscript, which greatly contributed to improving its quality.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this manuscript.
References
- [1].Li X, Shen X, Jiang W, et al. Comprehensive review of emerging contaminants: detection technologies, environmental impact, and management strategies. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024;278:116420. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Malafaia G. Why study the ecotoxicity of contaminants of emerging concern? In: Guilherme Malafaia, editor. Aquatic ecotoxicology of legacy pollutants and emerging contaminants in animals and plants. Cham, Switzerland: Springer; 2025. p. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- [3].Samal K, Mahapatra S, Ali MH. Pharmaceutical wastewater as emerging contaminants (EC): treatment technologies, impact on environment and human health. Energy Nexus. 2022;6:100076. doi: 10.1016/j.nexus.2022.100076 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [4].World Health Organization . Safe management of pharmaceutical waste from health care facilities: global best practices. In: Safe management of pharmaceutical waste from health care facilities: global best practices. World Health Organization; 2025. p. 1–3. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/8c19098a-1fb1-4ab2-88ff-f6062ef55c99/content [Google Scholar]
- [5].Cirstea I, Nemeth TS, Tit DM, et al. From policy to practice: community pharmacists’ self-reported counseling role in pharmaceutical waste management. In: Healthcare(Basel). 2026;14(3):386. doi: 10.3390/healthcare14030386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Zhang C, Barron LP, Stürzenbaum SR. Pollution of soil by pharmaceuticals: implications for metazoan and environmental health. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025;65(1):547–565. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-030124-111214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Han J, He S, Lichtfouse E. Waves of pharmaceutical waste. Environ Chem Lett. 2023;21(3):1251–1255. doi: 10.1007/s10311-022-01491-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Li H, Liu Y, Chen Q, et al. Research progress of zebrafish model in aquatic ecotoxicology. Water. 2023;15(9):1735. doi: 10.3390/w15091735 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Schür C, Gasser L, Perez-Cruz F, et al. A benchmark dataset for machine learning in ecotoxicology. Sci Data. 2023;10(1):718. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02612-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Drzymała J, Kalka J. Effects of diclofenac, sulfamethoxazole, and wastewater from constructed wetlands on Eisenia fetida: impacts on mortality, fertility, and oxidative stress. Ecotoxicology. 2023;32(7):858–873. doi: 10.1007/s10646-023-02690-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Sukkar D, Falla-Angel J, Laval-Gilly P. Bees as environmental and toxicological bioindicators in the light of pesticide non-targeted exposure. Sci Total Environ. 2025;964:178639. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Luo X, Yang Q, Lin Y, et al. Black soldier fly larvae effectively degrade lincomycin from pharmaceutical industry wastes. J Environ Manage. 2022;307:114539. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114539 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Rehman KU, Hollah C, Wiesotzki K, et al. Black soldier fly, Hermetia illucens as a potential innovative and environmentally friendly tool for organic waste management: a mini-review. Waste Manag Res. 2023;41(1):81–97. doi: 10.1177/0734242X221105441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Xu X, Huang Y, Luo X. Black soldier fly: a new model for bioremediation of antibiotic pollutants. Natl Sci Rev. 2025;12(3):nwaf043. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Obafemi OT, Ayeleso AO, Adewale OB, et al. Animal models in biomedical research: relevance of Drosophila melanogaster. Heliyon. 2025;11(1):e41605. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Victor Atoki A, Aja PM, Shinkafi TS, et al. Exploring the versatility of Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism in biomedical research: a comprehensive review. Fly (Austin). 2025;19(1):2420453. doi: 10.1080/19336934.2024.2420453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Passas I. Bibliometric analysis: the main steps. Encyclopedia. 2024;4(2):1014–1025. doi: 10.3390/encyclopedia4020065 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Dirpan A, Ainani AF, Djalal M. A bibliometrics visualization analysis of active packaging system for food packaging. Heliyon. 2023;9(8):e18457. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Saeed H, Martini ND, Scahill S. Exploring telepharmacy: a bibliometric analysis of past research and future directions. Res Soc Administrative Pharm. 2024;20(9):805–819. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Dirpan A, Yolanda DS, Djalal M. Is the use of biosensor in monitoring food quality experiencing an uplift trend over the last 30 years? a bibliometric analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9(8):e18977. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Alshater MM, Hassan MK, Rashid M, et al. A bibliometric review of the waqf literature. Eurasian Econ Rev. 2022;12(2):213–239. doi: 10.1007/s40822-021-00183-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, et al. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: an overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2021;133:285–296. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Shamim MA, Satapathy P, Padhi BK, et al. Pharmacological treatment and vaccines in monkeypox virus: a narrative review and bibliometric analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1149909. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1149909 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Arumugam A, Lee KE, Ng PY, et al. Pharmaceuticals in water: fate, health risks, treatment and governance for sustainable management. Water air Soil Pollut. 2026;237(14):828. doi: 10.1007/s11270-026-09479-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Alqarni AM. Analytical methods for the determination of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in solid and liquid environmental matrices: a review. Molecules. 2024;29(16):3900. doi: 10.3390/molecules29163900 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Ullah R, Asghar I, Griffiths MG. An integrated methodology for bibliometric analysis: a case study of internet of things in healthcare applications. Sensors. 2022;23(1):67. doi: 10.3390/s23010067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].López FJ, Pitarch E, Botero-Coy AM, et al. Removal efficiency for emerging contaminants in a WWTP from Madrid (Spain) after secondary and tertiary treatment and environmental impact on the Manzanares River. Sci Total Environ. 2022;812:152567. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Kötke D, Gandrass J, Bento CPM, et al. Occurrence and environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals in the Mondego River (Portugal). Heliyon. 2024;10(15):e34825. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Rui X, Gong H, Hu J, et al. Distribution, removal and potential factors affecting antibiotics occurrence in leachate from municipal solid waste incineration plants in China. Water Res. 2025;275:123187. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2025.123187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Ortega ADSB, Roveri V, Paço MDS, et al. Occurrence and potential ecological risks of pharmaceuticals and illicit drugs (PhIds) in the Santos-São Vicente estuarine system (SSVES). Braz. Mar Pollut Bull. 2025;219:118291. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Jameel Y, Valle D, Kay P. Spatial variation in the detection rates of frequently studied pharmaceuticals in Asian, European and North American rivers. Sci Total Environ. 2020;724:137947. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Spilsbury F, Inostroza PA, Svedberg P, et al. Defining the data gap: what do we know about environmental exposure, hazards and risks of pharmaceuticals in the European aquatic environment? Water Res. 2024;251:121002. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.121002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].da Silva PMMD, Alkimin GDD, Camparotto NG, et al. Toxicological effects resulting from co-exposure to nanomaterials and to a β-blocker pharmaceutical drug in the non-target macrophyte species Lemna minor. Environ Pollut. 2023;322:121166. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Brooks BW, van den Berg S, Dreier DA, et al. Towards precision ecotoxicology: leveraging evolutionary conservation of pharmaceutical and personal care product targets to understand adverse outcomes across species and life stages. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2024;43(3):526–536. doi: 10.1002/etc.5754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Diogo BS, Rodrigues S, Speksnijder B, et al. Chronic toxicity of antibiotics and global warming in Danio rerio: biomarker responses and toxicological effects. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2025;296:110240. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2025.110240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Wiles SC, Bertram MG, Martin JM, et al. Long-term pharmaceutical contamination and temperature stress disrupt fish behavior. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(13):8072–8082. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c01625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Bertram MG, Brand JA, Thoré ESJ, et al. Slow-release pharmaceutical implants in ecotoxicology: validating functionality across exposure scenarios. ACS Environ Au. 2024;5(1):69–75. doi: 10.1021/acsenvironau.4c00056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Hernando MD, Mezcua M, Fernandezalba A, et al. Environmental risk assessment of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater effluents, surface waters and sediments. Talanta. 2006;69(2):334–342. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2005.09.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Sumpter JP. Environmental effects of human pharmaceuticals. Drug Inf J DIJ Drug Inf Assoc. 2007;41(2):143–147. doi: 10.1177/009286150704100203 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Sumpter JP, Johnson AC, Runnalls TJ. Pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment: no answers yet to the major questions. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2024;43(3):589–594. doi: 10.1002/etc.5421 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Sumpter JP, Runnalls TJ, Donnachie RL, et al. A comprehensive aquatic risk assessment of the beta-blocker propranolol, based on the results of over 600 research papers. Sci Total Environ. 2021;793:148617. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Sousa B, Domingues I, Nunes B. A fish perspective on SARS-CoV-2: toxicity of benzalkonium chloride on Danio rerio. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023;102:104200. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2023.104200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Queirós V, Leite C, Azeiteiro UM, et al. Effects of water temperature increase on gene expression, biochemical, and histopathological responses of the bivalve species Mytilus galloprovincialis to the antineoplastic drug 5-fluorouracil. Sci Total Environ. 2025;992:179947. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.179947 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Pereira A, Cunha M, Cuccaro A, et al. The ecotoxicological effects of diclofenac and gentamicin on Mytilus galloprovincialis: what does in vivo reveal that in vitro fails to show? Environ Pollut. 2025;372:126045. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Klarin A. How to conduct a bibliometric content analysis: guidelines and contributions of content co-occurrence or co-word literature reviews. Int J Consum Stud. 2024;48(2):e13031. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.13031 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Zhou X, Zhou M, Huang D, et al. A probabilistic model for co-occurrence analysis in bibliometrics. J Biomed Inf. 2022;128:104047. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Bukar UA, Sayeed MS, Razak SFA, et al. A method for analyzing text using VOSviewer. MethodsX. 2023;11:102339. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102339 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Wu D, Bai H, He L-Y, et al. From river to groundwater: antibiotics pollution, resistance prevalence, and source tracking. Environ Int. 2025;196:109305. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109305 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Malla MA, Nomalihle M, Featherston J, et al. Comprehensive profiling and risk assessment of antibiotic resistomes in surface water and plastisphere by integrated shotgun metagenomics. J Hazard Mater. 2025;487:137180. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Castillo-Zacarías C, Barocio ME, Hidalgo-Vázquez E, et al. Antidepressant drugs as emerging contaminants: occurrence in urban and non-urban waters and analytical methods for their detection. Sci Total Environ. 2021;757:143722. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Vieira CED, de Jesus AC, Branco GS, et al. Sublethal effects of diclofenac and ibuprofen, individually and in mixture, in a neotropical fish: a multi-biomarker assessment under environmentally realistic concentrations. Aquat Toxicol. 2025;289:107609. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2025.107609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Panagopoulou EI, Aleiferi E, Damalas DE, et al. Investigating the role of biotransformation in the toxicokinetics of ionizable organic compounds, using LC-HRMS-Zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos exposed to ibuprofen as a case study. Environ Int. 2025;206:109933. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2025.109933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Anokye K. Black soldier fly larvae as a circular solution for organic waste management and sustainable livestock feed in Ghana. Cleaner Waste Syst. 2025;12:100416. doi: 10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100416 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Nadiga AP, Krishna KL, Moin A, et al. Exposure of zinc-induced Parkinson’s disease-like non-motor and motor symptoms in relation to oxidative/nitrosative stress mediated neurodegeneration in the brain of Drosophila melanogaster. J Pharmacol Sci. 2025;158(4):303–309. doi: 10.1016/j.jphs.2025.05.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Machado FR, Bortolotto VC, Araujo SM, et al. Toxicological analysis of chronic exposure to polymeric nanocapsules with different coatings in Drosophila melanogaster. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024;283:109939. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2024.109939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Harriage SJ, Schultz NL, Barton PS, et al. The trophic transfer of pharmaceuticals and personal care products: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hazard Mater. 2025;498:139806. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139806 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Ruhí A, Acuña V, Barceló D, et al. Bioaccumulation and trophic magnification of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in a Mediterranean river food web. Sci Total Environ. 2016;540:250–259. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Previšić A, Vilenica M, Vučković N, et al. Aquatic insects transfer pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors from aquatic to terrestrial ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol. 2021;55(6):3736–3746. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c07609 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Dandi SO, Evensen Ø, Addo S, et al. Antibiotic residues in farmed fish and sediments from cage aquaculture: insights from stratum II of the Volta Lake, Ghana. J Hazard Mater Adv. 2025;21:100961. doi: 10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100961 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Veseli M, Rožman M, Vilenica M, et al. Bioaccumulation and bioamplification of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in aquatic insects. Sci Total Environ. 2022;838:156208. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Mianecki AL, Behrens JR, Kolpin DW, et al. From water to web: trophic transfer of neonicotinoids from a wastewater effluent-dominated stream to riparian spiders. ACS Environ Au. 2025;5(5):457–467. doi: 10.1021/acsenvironau.5c00021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Zhang C, Barron L, Sturzenbaum S. The transportation, transformation and (bio) accumulation of pharmaceuticals in the terrestrial ecosystem. Sci Total Environ. 2021;781:146684. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146684 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].Du B, Haddad SP, Luek A, et al. Bioaccumulation and trophic dilution of human pharmaceuticals across trophic positions of an effluent-dependent wadeable stream. Phil Trans The R Soc B Biol Sci. 2014;369(1656):20140058. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Öztürk E, Ateş AE, Selçuk H, et al. Treatment of real pharmaceutical industry wastewater by photo-Fenton oxidation using the response surface methodology, evaluation of diclofenac degradation and toxicity. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 2025;64:102004. doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2025.102004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Jiang J, Zhao S, Guo X, et al. Toxic effects of combined exposure to carbamazepine and triclosan on adult zebrafish (danio rerio): insights into acute mortality, neurotransmitters, biochemical response, and histopathology. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2025;294:110190. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2025.110190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [66].Fakhri BMS, Ghassemi Barghi N, Moradnia Mehdikhanmahaleh M, et al. Pharmaceutical wastewater toxicity: an ignored threat to the public health. Sustain Environ. 2024;10(1):2322821. doi: 10.1080/27658511.2024.2322821 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Amin MF, Rahmana MS. A critical review of pharmaceutical pollutants in soil and air: ecotoxicological impacts on animal, plant and microbial communities-health hazards and waste management. Environ Pollut Manag. 2025;3:70–87. doi: 10.1016/j.epm.2025.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Zhai J, Li M, Wang X. Enrofloxacin’s dual effects on earthworms: reproductive toxicity at environmental levels and growth promotion at elevated concentrations. J Environ Sci. 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2025.09.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Ni Z, Tian X, Zhao W, et al. The detrimental effects and mechanisms of orlistat in disrupting energy homeostasis and reproduction in Daphnia magna. Aquat Toxicol. 2025;279:107201. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Sandré F, Duval A, Garrigue-Antar L. From pharmaceuticals to toxic threats: unveiling the impact of furosemide and by-products on fish model. Aquat Toxicol. 2025;286:107455. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2025.107455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Monsinjon T, Knigge T. Endocrine disrupters affect the immune system of fish: the example of the European seabass. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2025;162:110303. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2025.110303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Adjei JK, Dayie AD, Addo JK, et al. Occurrence, ecological risk assessment and source apportionment of pharmaceuticals, steroid hormones and xenoestrogens in the Ghanaian aquatic environments. Toxicol Rep. 2022;9:1398–1409. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.06.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Álvarez-Muñoz D, Rodríguez-Mozaz S, Maulvault AL, et al. Occurrence of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disrupting compounds in macroalgaes, bivalves, and fish from coastal areas in Europe. Environ Res. 2015;143:56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Mikula P, Hollerova A, Hodkovicova N, et al. Long-term dietary exposure to the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs diclofenac and ibuprofen can affect the physiology of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) on multiple levels, even at “environmentally relevant” concentrations. Sci Total Environ. 2024;917:170296. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170296 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Zulkarnain NN, Anuar N, Johari NA, et al. Cytotoxicity evaluation of ketoprofen found in pharmaceutical wastewater on HEK 293 cell growth and metabolism. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020;80:103498. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2020.103498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Saaristo M, Sharp S, McKenzie R, et al. Pharmaceuticals in biota: the impact of wastewater treatment plant effluents on fish in Australia. Environ Pollut. 2024;359:124695. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Gangar T, Patra S. Antibiotic persistence and its impact on the environment. 3 Biotech. 2023;13(12):401. doi: 10.1007/s13205-023-03806-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Chapagaee P, Thapa S, Shrestha S, et al. Valorisation of organic wastes through black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae: impacts on growth, nutritional composition, and bioconversion efficiency. Waste Manag Bull. 2025;4(1):100278. doi: 10.1016/j.wmb.2025.100278 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Li M, Quan J, Liu B, et al. Insight into insect protein production and gut microbiota from mixed food waste bioconversion by black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens L.) larvae. Waste Manage. 2026;210:115239. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2025.115239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Fuhrmann A, Gold M, Loh RK, et al. Physical properties of food waste influence the efficiency of black soldier fly larvae bioconversion via microbial activity. J Environ Manage. 2025;387:125777. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Cai T, Xia M, Yuan W, et al. Bioconversion of sulfamethazine-contaminated chicken manure by black soldier fly larvae: effects on antibiotic resistance genes and microbial communities. J Environ Manage. 2024;371:123206. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Demir E, Demir FT. Genotoxicity responses of single and mixed exposure to heavy metals (cadmium, silver, and copper) as environmental pollutants in Drosophila melanogaster. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024;106:104390. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2024.104390 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Wāng Y. Drosophila melanogaster as sentinel organism for hazard identification of environmental contaminants. J Hazard Mater. 2025;497:139600. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Xu G, Long X, Zhai J, et al. Toxicological effects and defense mechanisms induced by beta-cypermethrin in Drosophila melanogaster. J Environ Manage. 2024;370:122845. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122845 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Singh AS, Pathak D, Jain S, et al. Evaluating the potential toxicity of ampicillin using Drosophila melanogaster as a model organism. Toxicol Rep. 2025;14:101992. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2025.101992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Lüersen K, Nevermann S, Nebendahl M, et al. A diet-based Drosophila melanogaster model for the in vivo pharmacological evaluation of α-glucosidase inhibitors. Eur J Pharmacol. 2025;1005:178028. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2025.178028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Gunnala S, Harrison A, Juba A, et al. Increased dietary levels of folic acid reduce survival and alters climbing behaviors 24 hours after hypoxia in male and female Drosophila melanogaster. Behav Brain Res. 2025;499:115941. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115941 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Vecchie’ D, Wolter JM, Perry J, et al. The impact of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor lisinopril on metabolic rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(18):10103. doi: 10.3390/ijms251810103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Hundebøl BNRG, Rohde PD, Kristensen TN, et al. Bugs on drugs: paracetamol exposure reveals genotype-specific generational effects on life history traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Insects. 2024;15(10):763. doi: 10.3390/insects15100763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Saeedi BJ, Hunter-Chang S, Luo L, et al. Oxidative stress mediates end-organ damage in a novel model of acetaminophen-toxicity in Drosophila. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):19309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21156-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Zárate RV, Hidalgo S, Navarro N, et al. An early disturbance in serotonergic neurotransmission contributes to the onset of parkinsonian phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster. Cells. 2022;11(9):1544. doi: 10.3390/cells11091544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Pitoniak A, Bohmann D. Mechanisms and functions of Nrf2 signaling in Drosophila. Free Radical Biol Med. 2015;88:302–313. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Spiers JG, Breda C, Robinson S, et al. Drosophila Nrf2/Keap1 mediated redox signaling supports synaptic function and longevity and impacts on circadian activity. Front Mol Neurosci. 2019;12:86. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Wang Y, Li Y, Zang X, et al. Lead (Pb) load interacts with oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster through MTF-1/Nrf2/JNK mediated metallothionein expression. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2025;292:117921. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117921 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Ramalho DL, Silva JR, Monteiro Martins dos Santos ME, et al. The neurotoxicity of paraquat and its degradation products on Drosophila melanogaster. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):16447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86413-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this manuscript.
