ABSTRACT
Obesity‐associated inflammation is partly driven by damage‐associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). However, whether and how these molecules directly restrain energy expenditure and thereby exacerbate metabolic dysfunction remains unclear. Here, we identify N‐Myc and STAT interactor (NMI) as a stress‐responsive adipokine that suppresses adaptive thermogenesis. NMI expression and secretion are increased in adipocytes exposed to dietary stress and inflammatory cues. Genetic ablation of Nmi protects mice from diet‐induced obesity (DIO) through enhanced energy expenditure and cold tolerance driven by augmented brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis and white adipose tissue (WAT) browning. Mechanistically, adipose tissue‐derived NMI activates TLR4/IRF3 signaling, which transcriptionally represses the core thermogenic regulators PPARα, PGC‐1α, and UCP1. Therapeutically, neutralization of NMI with a monoclonal antibody ameliorates obesity and reduces adipose tissue macrophage infiltration in DIO mice. Together, our findings establish NMI as an adipokine that couples inflammatory signaling with suppressed energy expenditure, highlighting its therapeutic potential for obesity and associated metabolic disorders.
Keywords: N‐Myc and STAT interactor (NMI), adaptive thermogenesis, immunometabolism, PPAR, IRF3
Adipose tissue‐derived NMI is secreted under metabolic stress and suppresses adaptive thermogenesis through TLR4/IRF3 signaling, repressing the PPARα/PGC‐1α/UCP1 thermogenic transcriptional program. Genetic ablation or anti ‐ NMI monoclonal antibody treatment enhances energy expenditure, protects against DIO, and ameliorates adipose tissue inflammation, positioning NMI as an immunometabolic regulator and potential therapeutic target for obesity.

1. Introduction
Obesity is a major global health challenge [1, 2]. It primarily arises from a chronic energy imbalance, wherein caloric intake exceeds energy expenditure [3]. Enhancing energy expenditure through adaptive thermogenesis, defined as regulated heat production in response to environmental or physiological stimuli such as cold exposure or overfeeding, therefore represents a compelling therapeutic strategy, as it directly counteracts the positive energy balance that drives weight gain [4]. This process primarily occurs in brown and beige adipose tissues, which are characterized by the expression of uncoupling protein 1 (UCP1) to dissipate chemical energy as heat via mitochondrial uncoupling [5]. Upon cold stimulation, the β‐adrenergic receptor signaling cascade promotes the activation of the key transcriptional regulators of adaptive thermogenesis, including peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor α (PPARα) and PPARγ coactivator 1α (PGC‐1α), which drive UCP1 expression and mitochondrial biogenesis, thereby maintaining body temperature and contributing to energy balance [4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].
Obesity and its associated metabolic complications are closely associated with chronic, low‐grade inflammation within adipose tissue [11], which exacerbates metabolic dysfunction and represents a promising therapeutic target [12]. Intriguingly, PPARs also suppress inflammation by antagonizing pro‐inflammatory pathways, including nuclear factor kappa‐B (NF‐κB), activator protein 1 (AP‐1), and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) [13, 14]. This dual functionality in promoting energy expenditure and attenuating inflammation positions PPAR activation as a potentially synergistic strategy to ameliorate obesity and its sequelae. However, the molecular mechanisms that couple pro‐inflammatory signaling to the suppression of adipose adaptive thermogenesis remain poorly defined.
Damage‐associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are endogenous molecules released under cellular stress and serve as critical mediators of sterile inflammation in obesity [15]. Typically lacking a classical signal peptide, DAMPs can be secreted from living cells via non‐canonical secretory pathways, vesicular transport, or membrane channels [16, 17, 18]. Extracellular DAMPs sustain chronic inflammation by activating pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) such as Toll‐like receptors (TLRs), thereby making DAMPs potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets [19, 20]. Notably, in adipose tissue, TLR4 activation triggers the nuclear translocation of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) [21], an event that directly suppresses adaptive thermogenesis and promotes weight gain [22, 23]. These findings support the TLR4/IRF3 axis as a molecular link between inflammation and energy expenditure. Nonetheless, the upstream endogenous DAMPs that initiate this suppressive pathway remain unidentified.
N‐Myc and STAT interactor (NMI) is an interferon‐inducible protein with emerging roles in metabolism and inflammation. Beyond its established functions in immunity and tumorigenesis [24], NMI interacts with a key metabolic stress sensor. In pancreatic β‐cells, NMI binds to and modulates inositol‐requiring enzyme 1α (IRE1α) [25], a central hub in glucose and lipid metabolism as well as inflammation [26, 27, 28]. Notably, in adipocytes, IRE1α suppresses adaptive thermogenesis by repressing PGC‐1α [29]. Moreover, NMI has been strongly implicated in inflammatory processes and can function as a DAMP that sustains inflammation through TLR activation [19, 20, 30]. Given that NMI regulates IRE1α, a metabolic stress sensor [25, 26, 27, 28], and acts as a TLR4‐activating DAMP [30, 31], and that TLR4/IRF3 signaling suppresses adaptive thermogenesis [21, 22, 23], we hypothesize that NMI serves as a molecular integrator linking pro‐inflammatory signaling to the suppression of adaptive thermogenesis.
In this study, we demonstrate that Nmi deficiency protects mice from diet‐induced obesity (DIO) and metabolic dysfunction, as evidenced by increased energy expenditure, improved cold tolerance, and elevated thermogenic gene expression. Mechanistically, adipose tissue‐derived NMI activates TLR4/IRF3 signaling to suppress PPARα‐driven thermogenic transcription, thereby inhibiting UCP1‐mediated adaptive thermogenesis. Therapeutically, NMI neutralization via a monoclonal antibody ameliorates obesity and attenuates adipose tissue macrophage infiltration. Collectively, our findings establish NMI as a critical link between inflammatory and metabolic pathways, revealing its potential as a therapeutic target for obesity and associated metabolic disorders.
2. Results
2.1. Nmi Deficiency Protects Against DIO and Metabolic Dysfunction
Analysis of human and mouse cohorts revealed an association between NMI expression and obesity. In overweight individuals, adipose NMI expression was upregulated and positively correlated with homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) (Figure 1A,B). Consistently, NMI expression was significantly reduced in the weight‐loss intervention maintenance cohort (Figure 1C). Nmi was also upregulated in brown adipose tissue (BAT) and subcutaneous white adipose tissue (scWAT) of obese mice (Figure 1D, Figure S1A). To characterize Nmi expression across cell types, we analyzed public single‐nucleus RNA‐seq data and found Nmi was enriched in adipocytes and immune cells (Figure S1B). Notably, unlike typical DAMPs, Nmi expression was rapidly downregulated following both acute and chronic cold exposure (Figure S1C,D), suggesting a potential negative role in adaptive thermogenesis, rather than merely reflecting a passive stress response.
FIGURE 1.

Nmi deficiency attenuates HFD‐induced adiposity and hepatic steatosis. (A) mRNA expression of damage‐associated molecular pattern (DAMP) genes in normal and overweight individuals (n = 770). (B) Pearson correlation between NMI expression and homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA‐IR) in humans (n = 770). (C) Changes in NMI expression in adipose tissue after dietary intervention‐induced weight loss and during the maintenance period in a weight‐loss cohort (n = 46). (D) Nmi mRNA expression in adipose tissues from lean and obese mice (n = 6). (E) Body weight (BW) of WT (Nmi+/+ ) and Nmi‐deficient (Nmi−/− ) mice fed normal chow diet (NCD) (n = 9–12). (F, G) BW of Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice under high‐fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks. Representative images (F) and BW growth curve (G, n = 6–9). (H) Fat mass and fat mass percentage measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice after 12 weeks of HFD (n = 6–9). (I, J) Fat depot weights in Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice after 12 weeks of HFD. Representative images (I) and weights of total white adipose tissue (total WAT), subcutaneous WAT (scWAT), epididymal WAT (eWAT), and perirenal WAT (pWAT) (J, n = 6–9). (K) Brown adipose tissue (BAT) weight in Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice after 12 weeks of HFD (n = 6–9). (L) Representative images of H&E staining in scWAT and BAT after 12 weeks of HFD. (M) Liver weight after 12 weeks of HFD (n = 6–9). (N) Representative images of liver H&E and Oil Red O staining after 12 weeks of HFD. (O, P) Glucose tolerance test (GTT, O) and insulin tolerance test (ITT, P) after 12 weeks of HFD, quantified by area under the curve (AUC, n = 6–9). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses: two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test (A, D, H, J, K, M, AUC of O, P), Pearson correlation analysis (B), two‐tailed paired Student's t‐test (C), two‐way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test (E, G, O, P). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant.
To investigate the functional role of NMI in adaptive thermogenesis, we generated global Nmi knockout (Nmi−/− ) mice (Figure S2A,B). On a normal chow diet (NCD), Nmi−/− mice exhibited no difference in body weight (BW), adipose morphology, or glucose homeostasis compared to wild‐type (WT, Nmi+/+ ) littermates (Figure 1E, Figure S2C–F). However, when challenged with a high‐fat diet (HFD, 60% kcal from fat), Nmi−/− mice showed significant resistance to weight gain, with 19.4% lower BW than Nmi+/+ littermates after 12 weeks (Figure 1F,G). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in fat mass and no alteration in lean mass (Figure 1H, Figure S2G). Consistently, the weights of all major adipose depots, including scWAT, epididymal WAT (eWAT), perirenal WAT (pWAT), and BAT were significantly reduced in Nmi−/− mice (Figure 1I–K), which was accompanied by an increased proportion of smaller adipocytes (Figure 1L, Figure S2H).
HFD‐fed Nmi−/− mice also displayed several systemic metabolic improvements, including reduced liver weight and hepatic lipid accumulation (Figure 1M,N), as well as enhanced glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity (Figure 1O,P). Collectively, these results demonstrate that NMI promotes the development of DIO and metabolic dysfunction, and global Nmi ablation confers substantial metabolic protection.
2.2. Nmi Deletion Counteracts Obesity by Enhancing Energy Expenditure
We next investigated whether the lean phenotype of HFD‐fed Nmi−/− mice stems from altered energy balance. Food intake and cumulative 48‐h energy intake in metabolic cages were comparable between Nmi−/− mice and wild‐type littermates (Figure 2A,B), ruling out reduced caloric intake as a contributing factor. Strikingly, Nmi−/− mice exhibited significantly increased whole‐body energy expenditure, as evidenced by elevated oxygen consumption (VO2) and carbon dioxide production (VCO2) (Figure 2C–E). This difference remained significant after normalization to BW (Figure 2F, Figure S3A), supporting the notion that the effect was not solely driven by differences in body mass. In contrast, the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and physical activity were unchanged between genotypes (Figure S3B,C), indicating similar overall fuel oxidation patterns and locomotor activity. In addition, we preliminarily ruled out contributions from other factors, including altered nutrient absorption and fecal energy loss (Figure 1E, Figure S3D,E). Collectively, our data demonstrate that Nmi deletion protects against obesity primarily through enhanced energy expenditure.
FIGURE 2.

Nmi deficiency enhances energy expenditure. (A, B) Food consumption (A) and cumulative energy intake (B) in Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice (n = 6–8). (C‐E) Oxygen consumption (VO2, C), carbon dioxide production (VCO2, D) and total energy expenditure (E) in Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice (n = 6–8). (F) Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of energy expenditure with BW as a covariate (n = 6–8). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses: two‐way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test (A), two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test (B–E), ANCOVA with BW as covariate (F). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant.
2.3. Nmi Deficiency Enhances Thermogenic Capacity and Cold Tolerance
UCP1‐mediated adaptive thermogenesis in BAT and beige adipocytes is a central regulator of energy expenditure [6, 32, 33, 34]. Therefore, we investigated whether enhanced adaptive thermogenesis underlies the obesity resistance in Nmi−/− mice. Indeed, Nmi deletion significantly upregulated UCP1 protein levels in BAT of HFD‐fed mice (Figure 3A), with immunohistochemical staining confirming abundant UCP1 within multilocular adipocytes in both BAT and scWAT (Figure 3B).
FIGURE 3.

Nmi deficiency promotes BAT adaptive thermogenesis and scWAT browning in HFD‐fed mice. (A, B) UCP1 protein levels in adipose tissue of HFD‐fed Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice, assessed by Western blotting (A, n = 8) and immunohistochemistry (B, n = 6). (C) Time‐course changes in core body temperature over 24 h under thermoneutral conditions (30°C) in Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice (n = 12–14). (D) Thermogenic protein levels in BAT under thermoneutral conditions (30°C) in Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice, determined by Western blotting (n = 6). (E) Representative UCP1 immunohistochemistry images in scWAT and BAT under thermoneutral conditions (30°C). (F, G) Core body temperature (F, n = 5) and surface temperature (G, n = 7) in 8‐week‐old Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice under cold exposure (4°C), with representative infrared thermal images of the lumbar back region and interscapular BAT. (H) Representative UCP1 immunohistochemistry images in scWAT and BAT under cold exposure (4°C). (I) Thermogenic protein levels in BAT under cold exposure (4°C), determined by Western blotting (n = 6). (J, K) Mitochondrial biogenesis‐related gene expression in BAT (J) and scWAT (K) of Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice under HFD feeding (n = 8). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses: two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test (A, B, D, G–I), two‐way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test (C, F). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant.
We next assessed thermogenic capacity by challenging mice with cold exposure (4°C) [35, 36]. Under strict thermoneutral control conditions (30°C), core body temperature and thermogenic protein levels were comparable between the two genotypes (Figure 3C, Figure S3F), indicating no baseline differences in thermogenic regulators such as PGC‐1α and UCP1 (Figure 3D,E). However, upon cold exposure, Nmi−/− mice exhibited a significantly higher core body temperature throughout the 24‐h challenge (Figure 3F). Non‐invasive infrared thermography also revealed a similar phenotype, with significantly elevated surface temperatures over the intrascapular BAT and lumbar region (Figure 3G), consistent with heightened adaptive thermogenesis. This improved cold tolerance was accompanied by robust induction of thermogenic proteins in BAT and pronounced browning of scWAT (Figure 3H,I). Moreover, cold exposure triggered a more substantial reduction in adipocyte size in both scWAT and BAT of Nmi−/− mice compared to Nmi+/+ littermates (Figure S3G,H).
Beyond UCP1 protein expression, we examined regulators of mitochondrial biogenesis, a key correlate of thermogenic capacity [37]. mRNA levels of key mitochondrial biogenesis regulators (Nrf1, Tfam) were elevated in both BAT and scWAT of HFD‐fed Nmi−/− mice (Figure 3J,K). Collectively, these findings demonstrate that Nmi deficiency enhances energy expenditure by promoting mitochondrial biogenesis, improving BAT function and promoting WAT browning, which together constitute a coordinated adaptive thermogenic response.
2.4. NMI Is Enriched in Mature Adipocytes and Upregulated in Obesity
We first characterizedNMI expression across different adipose tissue depots in mice. NMI was ubiquitously expressed in scWAT, eWAT, and BAT, with both transcript and protein levels highest in BAT (Figure 4A,B). To identify its primary cellular source, we isolated the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and mature adipocytes from NCD wild‐type mice. Nmi expression was enriched in mature adipocytes across all depots compared to the SVF (Figure 4C). Moreover, NMI abundance increased further in BAT under obese conditions (Figure 4D). This adipocyte‐enriched expression pattern was further corroborated by in vitro differentiation and browning of 3T3‐L1 preadipocytes, during which NmimRNA and NMI protein levels were significantly increased (Figure 4E,F).
FIGURE 4.

NMI is enriched in mature adipocytes. (A, B) Nmi mRNA expression (A) and NMI protein levels (B) across adipose depots in 8‐week‐old male mice (n = 4). (C) Nmi mRNA expression in stromal vascular fraction (SVF) and mature adipocytes from 8‐ to 10‐week‐old chow‐fed mice (n = 3–6). (D) NMI protein levels in BAT from lean and diet‐induced obesity (DIO) mice, determined by Western blotting (n = 3). (E, F) Nmi mRNA (E, n = 3) and NMI protein (F, n = 6) during 3T3‐L1 differentiation into beige adipocytes (Day 0 and Day 8). (G) Schematic of fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) strategy for separating adipocyte precursor cells (CD45−) and immune cells (CD45+) from the SVF. (H) Nmi mRNA levels in SVF, immune cells, and mature adipocytes from lean mice and DIO mice (n = 3). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses: one‐way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test (A, B), two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test (C‐F, H). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant.
To examine NMI levels under metabolic stress, we performed fluorescence‐activated cell sorting (FACS) on digested adipose tissue from both lean and obese mice to separate mature adipocytes, non‐immune stromal cells (CD45−) and immune cells (CD45+) (Figure 4G). Notably, Nmi expression was specifically upregulated in mature BAT adipocytes under obese conditions (Figure 4H). Together, these findings establish mature adipocytes, particularly those within BAT, as the primary source of NMI expression in adipose tissue. Its expression was further amplified by obesity and during in vitro adipocyte differentiation process, supporting a role for NMI in mediating thermogenic regulation in adipocytes.
2.5. RNA‐seq Reveals Enhanced PPAR Signaling in BAT of Nmi−/− Mice
To elucidate the mechanism underlying NMI‐regulated adaptive thermogenesis, we performed RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) on BAT samples from HFD‐fed Nmi−/− and wild‐type littermates. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of pathways related to adaptive thermogenesis, PPAR signaling, and oxidative phosphorylation among upregulated genes in Nmi−/− mice (Figure 5A,B, Figure S4A). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) further confirmed positive enrichment of these pathways upon Nmi deletion (Figure 5C). Specifically, core genes within the PPAR axis, including genes involved in adaptive thermogenesis, fatty acid oxidation, and oxidative phosphorylation, were significantly upregulated (Figure 5D).
FIGURE 5.

Transcriptomic analysis reveals enhanced PPAR signaling and adaptive thermogenesis in BAT of Nmi−/− mice. (A) RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) of BAT from HFD‐fed Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs, |log2 fold change|> 1, false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.05) were primarily enriched in adaptive thermogenesis and fatty acid oxidation pathways (n = 4). (B) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of upregulated genes (|log2 fold change| > 1 and FDR < 0.05). (C) Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showing major upregulated pathways, including PPAR signaling, adaptive thermogenesis, and oxidative phosphorylation (normalized enrichment score [NES] > 1.7 and FDR < 0.002). (D) Heatmap of pathway‐related genes (PPAR signaling, adaptive thermogenesis, and oxidative phosphorylation) from RNA‐seq (n = 4). (E, F) Validation of RNA‐seq results by quantitative PCR (E) and Western blotting (F) (n = 8). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses for RNA‐seq: differential expression analysis was performed using DESeq2 (|log2 fold change| > 1, FDR < 0.05); KEGG and GSEA were performed using clusterProfiler. For validation experiments: two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test (E, F). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant.
We next validated these findings by examining key pathway components using quantitative PCR (qPCR). Expression levels of PPAR family members, key thermogenic genes, and fatty acid oxidation markers were consistent with RNA‐seq data (Figure 5E). This transcriptional upregulation was further supported by increased protein levels of PGC‐1α, PPARα, PPARγ, and UCP1 (Figure 5F), suggesting that Nmi deficiency enhances these thermogenic pathways. Together, these data reveal that Nmi deficiency enhances the PPAR signaling pathway and its downstream thermogenic program in BAT.
2.6. NMI Represses Adaptive Thermogenesis by Suppressing PPAR Signaling
To validate the cell‐autonomous role of NMI, we differentiated brown adipocytes in vitro from the BAT SVF of Nmi−/− mice (Figure S4B,C). Nmi deficiency led to reduced lipid accumulation (Figure 6A), suggestive of a more oxidative metabolic state. Based on transcriptomic data pointing to PPAR signaling, we next investigated whether this pathway was necessary for the enhanced adaptive thermogenesis in Nmi−/− adipocytes. Pharmacological inhibition of PPARα with GW6471 or PPARγ with GW9662 suppressed PPAR pathway activation and UCP1 induction (Figure 6B–E, Figure S4D,E). Furthermore, siRNA‐mediated knockdown of Ppara specifically reversed the elevated UCP1 expression (Figure 6F, Figure S4F,G). Collectively, these loss‐of‐function experiments demonstrate that PPAR signaling, particularly PPARα, is required for the augmented thermogenic capacity resulting from Nmi deletion. These findings provide a mechanistic basis for the increased energy expenditure observed in Nmi−/− mice (Figure 6G).
FIGURE 6.

NMI regulates adaptive thermogenesis through PPAR signaling. (A) Triacylglycerol (TAG) content in differentiated primary brown adipocytes from Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice (n = 8). (B, C) Thermogenic gene expression in primary brown adipocytes treated with 10 µm GW6471 (PPARα antagonist), or 10 µm GW9662 (PPARγ antagonist) for 24 h (B) or 48 h (C) (n = 4–6). (D, E) Thermogenic protein levels in primary brown adipocytes treated as in (B, C) for 24 h (D) or 48 h (E) (n = 4–6). (F) Thermogenic gene expression in primary adipocytes transfected with scramble siRNA or Ppara siRNA (100 nm) for 7 days (n = 4). (G) Model of NMI‐mediated suppression of adaptive thermogenesis via PPAR signaling. NMI induces transrepression of PPARα and PPARγ transcriptional activity, leading to UCP1 downregulation (Created with BioRender.com). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses: two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test (A), one‐way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test (B–F). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant.
2.7. NMI‐Mediated TLR4/IRF3 Signaling Impairs Adipocyte Thermogenesis
As NMI functions as a TLR4 agonist and TLR4/IRF3 signaling suppresses adipocyte adaptive thermogenesis [22, 23, 38, 39, 40, 41], we hypothesized that NMI impairs PPAR‐mediated adaptive thermogenesis through this axis. Stimulation of mature adipocytes with recombinant NMI induced IRF3 phosphorylation and downregulated key thermogenic proteins (PPARα, PGC‐1α, UCP1). These effects were alleviated by co‐treatment with the TLR4 inhibitor TAK‐242 (Figure 7A, Figure S5A). Next, we investigated the link between IRF3 and repression of the PPARα/PGC‐1α axis by pharmacologically modulating IRF3 activity. IRF3 activation induced by a synthetic double‐stranded RNA analog (Poly I:C) suppressed thermogenic gene expression and reduced PPARα, PGC‐1α, and UCP1 levels, whereas pharmacological inhibition of IRF3 signaling with the small‐molecule inhibitor (Amlexanox) alleviated these effects (Figure 7B). These results demonstrate that TLR4/IRF3 signaling is a critical mediator of NMI‐induced thermogenic suppression.
FIGURE 7.

NMI suppresses adaptive thermogenesis through TLR4/IRF3 signaling. (A) Mature adipocytes were pretreated with TAK‐242 (1 µm, TLR4 inhibitor) for 2 h, followed by recombinant NMI (5 µg mL−1) treatment for 24 h. Thermogenic proteins were subsequently analyzed by Western blotting (n = 6). (B) Mature adipocytes were pretreated with Amlexanox (50 µm, IRF3 inhibitor) for 1 h, followed by Poly I:C (50 µg mL−1, 1 h) treatment to induce IRF3 phosphorylation. Cell lysates were collected for detection of the indicated proteins (n = 6). (C) Mature adipocytes were stimulated with IFN‐γ (20 ng mL−1) and LPS (100 ng mL−1) for 24 h. Culture supernatants were analyzed for NMI secretion (n = 3). (D) Conditioned media from stimulated Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− adipocytes were transferred to WT primary adipocytes. Expression of the indicated proteins was subsequently examined by Western blotting (n = 6). (E) BW gain in DIO mice treated with monoclonal antibody‐mediated neutralization of NMI (mAb‐NMI, 10 mg kg−1) or PBS (n = 8). (F, G) GTT (F) and ITT (G) in DIO mice after 12 weeks of HFD and mAb‐NMI or PBS treatment, quantified by AUC (n = 8). (H) HFD‐induced adipose tissue inflammation in Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice (n = 6). (I) Macrophage infiltration in DIO mice treated with mAb‐NMI or PBS (n = 3–4). (J) A model summarizing that NMI, secreted by adipose tissue under HFD‐induced metabolic stress, activates TLR4/IRF3 signaling in brown adipocytes to suppress adaptive thermogenesis (Created with BioRender.com). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses: one‐way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test (A, B, I, AUC of F, G), two‐tailed unpaired Student's t‐test (D, H), two‐way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test (E–G). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant.
Given that activated macrophages release NMI [30, 31] and adipocytes also secrete other DAMPs [42, 43, 44], we investigated whether adipocytes themselves produce NMI. In an in vitro model mimicking an HFD‐induced inflammatory environment, adipocytes expressed and secreted NMI in response to interferon‐gamma (IFN‐γ) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation (Figure 7C). To test for autocrine function, we performed conditioned medium transfer experiments. Wild‐type adipocyte‐derived medium induced stronger IRF3 activation and PPARα/PGC‐1α/UCP1 suppression than medium from Nmi−/− adipocytes, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (Figure 7D). Together with the significant effects of exogenous NMI, these data suggest that NMI‐mediated suppression of adipocyte adaptive thermogenesis may involve not only adipocyte‐derived signals but also contributions from other cell types in adipose tissue, such as macrophages [30].
To evaluate the therapeutic potential of targeting NMI, we administered an NMI‐neutralizing antibody to DIO mice (Figure S5B–D). This treatment significantly reduced BW gain, improved glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity, as well as attenuated lipid accumulation (Figure 7E–G, Figure S5E). Furthermore, Nmi deficiency significantly attenuated HFD‐induced WAT inflammation, as shown by reduced levels of key inflammatory cytokines (Il6, Il1b, Tnf) in Nmi−/− mice (Figure 7H). Similarly, NMI neutralization significantly reduced macrophage infiltration (F4/80+ CD11b+) in WAT (Figure 7I, Figure S5F), indicating ameliorated adipose tissue inflammation.
In summary, our findings delineate a pathway in which adipose tissue inflammatory stress induces NMI secretion, which in turn activates adipocyte TLR4/IRF3 signaling to suppress PPAR‐mediated adaptive thermogenesis, thereby promoting obesity (Figure 7J). This mechanism highlights the role of NMI as a key link between inflammatory signaling and energy metabolism.
3. Discussion
Obesity is characterized by chronic low‐grade inflammation that disrupts adipose tissue homeostasis and contributes to metabolic dysfunction [11]. Although thermogenic activation has been shown to counteract inflammation and improve systemic metabolism [21, 45, 46], the endogenous signals that suppress this process in obesity remain poorly understood. In this study, we identify NMI as an adipose tissue‐derived regulator that links inflammatory signaling to impaired thermogenic capacity. Our findings demonstrate that under dietary and inflammatory stress, adipose tissue‐secreted NMI engages TLR4, leading to IRF3 phosphorylation and subsequent inhibition of adaptive thermogenesis. Thus, NMI emerges as a previously unrecognized negative regulator of adaptive thermogenesis and a critical node connecting adipose inflammation to impaired energy expenditure.
NMI belongs to the DAMP family of endogenous molecules, many of which are upregulated in obesity and perpetuate sterile inflammation through TLR4 signaling [15, 47]. TLR4 activation in adipose tissue disrupts metabolic function by promoting insulin resistance and suppressing UCP1 expression [23, 40], whereas its inhibition ameliorates inflammation [48]. Unlike classical DAMPs such as HMGB1 [19, 44, 49, 50, 51] and HSP70/90 [52, 53, 54], which modulate energy metabolism via the cAMP/PKA pathway [49, 52, 53, 55, 56] or PPARγ activity [57], NMI exhibits distinct characteristics [19, 20]. NMI is selectively upregulated under chronic metabolic stress and is secreted from living adipocytes in a regulated manner, rather than being passively released during cell death. In contrast to its induction under metabolic stress, Nmi expression is preferentially and persistently downregulated upon cold exposure. Moreover, our data indicate that NMI signals through TLR4 with a downstream bias toward IRF3 activation, suggesting that NMI selectively suppresses adaptive thermogenesis compared with other DAMPs that more broadly activate NF‐κB‐dependent inflammatory pathways.
Elevated circulating levels of NMI in obese miniature pigs [58] and nonhuman primates [59] further support its physiological relevance in energy homeostasis. Importantly, multiple lines of evidence support a non‐redundant and potentially prominent role for NMI in vivo. Genetic and pharmacological modulation of NMI leads to measurable changes in adipose thermogenic capacity and systemic energy expenditure, supporting a functional role for NMI that may not be fully compensated for by other DAMPs. Collectively, these findings position NMI as a context‐dependent, functionally distinct adipose tissue‐derived DAMP that links sterile inflammation to impaired energy expenditure. While partial redundancy with other DAMPs cannot be excluded, our data support a unique and potentially prominent role for NMI in suppressing adaptive thermogenesis under metabolic stress.
Mechanistically, we delineate a pathway in which adipose tissue‐derived NMI activates the TLR4/IRF3 axis, thereby suppressing PPARα‐mediated thermogenic transcription. TLR4 activation in adipocytes initiates a TRIF‐dependent cascade that leads to IRF3 activation [21, 38, 41], an axis known to promote inflammation and insulin resistance while directly inhibiting browning and thermogenesis [22, 23, 38, 40]. Our findings identify that NMI serves as an upstream activator of this axis. Furthermore, NMI suppresses the PPARα/PGC‐1α/UCP1 transcriptional program, a core regulatory hub for adaptive thermogenesis and mitochondrial biogenesis [60, 61]. Consistent with this, Nmi deficiency enhances PPAR signaling and upregulates thermogenic genes, whereas exogenous NMI reverses these effects in a TLR4‐mediated manner.
Beyond this linear pathway, our data suggest a self‐amplifying circuit that perpetuates thermogenic suppression under metabolic stress. Inflammatory stimulation induces the intracellular accumulation and secretion of NMI from adipocytes, and secreted NMI subsequently activates TLR4. In turn, TLR4 activation and the ensuing inflammatory response may further enhance NMI expression and secretion, creating an autocrine or paracrine loop that sustains IRF3 phosphorylation and transcriptional repression of the PPARα/PGC‐1α/UCP1 axis. This positive feedback mechanism provides a mechanistic explanation for the persistent impairment of adaptive thermogenesis in obese adipose tissue.
The therapeutic relevance of targeting NMI is supported by genetic and pharmacological intervention studies. Both genetic ablation of Nmi and pharmacological neutralization with a monoclonal antibody protected mice from DIO, improved insulin sensitivity, and attenuated adipose tissue inflammation. Notably, NMI neutralization reduced macrophage infiltration, a hallmark of adipose tissue inflammation, suggesting that targeting NMI may simultaneously alleviate inflammation and ameliorate metabolic dysfunction. Together, these findings provide proof‐of‐concept evidence that targeting NMI can modify the metabolic phenotype and support a causal role for NMI in its development.
Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, although our data indicate that enhanced energy expenditure is the primary driver of the lean phenotype in Nmi‐deficient mice, minor contributions from other factors, such as alterations in nutrient absorption, fecal energy loss, or the gut microbiome, cannot be completely excluded. Second, while we have delineated NMI's role in repressing adaptive thermogenesis through the TLR4/IRF3 pathway and suppression of the PPARα/PGC‐1α/UCP1 transcriptional program, the precise mechanism by which NMI regulates PPARα transcriptional activity remains incompletely defined. Based on existing evidence, we propose two plausible regulatory pathways: modulation of STAT3 signaling [62], which may enhance fatty acid oxidation via PPARα [63, 64] and promote PPARγ expression via C/EBPβ [65, 66], and interaction with IRE1α, where Nmi deficiency may alleviate IRE1α‐mediated suppression of PGC‐1α, thereby augmenting PPARα activity [25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. Third, although the increased energy expenditure is primarily attributed to BAT activation and scWAT browning, we acknowledge that other tissues, such as skeletal muscle, may also contribute. Notably, Nmi expression in skeletal muscle did not change significantly after HFD feeding; nevertheless, tissue ‑ specific studies will be required to fully delineate the contribution of individual tissues. Similarly, while whole‐body RER showed no significant difference, tissue‐specific changes in substrate utilization cannot be excluded. Additionally, while TLR4 serves as a key receptor for extracellular NMI, the potential involvement of other receptors such as TLR2 or receptor for advanced glycation end‐products (RAGE) cannot be ruled out, and the cellular mechanisms governing NMI secretion remain undefined. Finally, the use of global Nmi knockout mice limits tissue‑specific interpretations. Future studies employing cell‐type‐specific genetic models will be essential to dissect the physiological role of NMI signaling in whole‐body energy homeostasis, to more precisely define the cellular source and mode of action of NMI, and to evaluate its potential as a therapeutic target for obesity.
In conclusion, our work positions NMI as a pivotal immunometabolic regulator linking sterile inflammation to impaired energy expenditure. We delineate a pathway in which adipose tissue‐derived NMI activates the TLR4/IRF3 axis, thereby suppressing the PPARα/PGC‐1α/UCP1 transcriptional program and inhibiting adaptive thermogenesis. This regulatory mechanism not only advances our understanding of obesity pathogenesis but also identifies NMI as a promising therapeutic target. Pharmacological disruption of this signaling pathway may restore thermogenesis and offer a novel strategy to combat obesity and its associated metabolic disorders.
4. Experimental Methods
4.1. Gene Expression Analysis in Clinical Cohorts and Mouse Bioinformatic Analysis
The initial transcriptomic profiles were derived from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) and included subcutaneous white adipose tissue (scWAT) biopsies of 770 male participants in the population‐based METSIM study. These profiles were obtained using the Affymetrix Human Genome U219 Array and deposited under accession number GSE70353. Additional transcriptomic data came from abdominal scWAT biopsies of 25 males and 28 females with overweight or obesity (BMI: 28–35 kg m−2) who underwent a dietary intervention; these transcriptome profiles were acquired using the Affymetrix Human Gene 1.1 ST Array, and the dataset was archived under accession number GSE77962.
Bioinformatic analysis was performed using mouse datasets sourced from the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The GSE15822 dataset, which was generated using the Illumina Mouse‐6 v1.1 expression bead chip and contains data from various adipose tissues of mice fed a standard breeding diet, was analyzed. In addition, the GSE242711 dataset (Illumina NextSeq 500 platform) and the GSE294416 dataset (DNBSEQ‐G50 platform) were analyzed by RNA sequencing to assess mRNA levels in mature adipocytes from the brown, beige, and white adipose depots of mice exposed to cold for 21 days and 24 h, respectively.
4.2. Animal Experiments
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Sun Yat‐sen University (Approval No. SYSU‐IACUC‐2023‐001743). Nmi knockout (referred to as Nmi−/− ) mice on a C57BL/6J background were generated via CRISPR‐Cas9‐mediated gene editing as previously described [30]. The mice were housed in a specific pathogen‐free (SPF) facility at the Experimental Animal Center of Sun Yat‐sen University under controlled environmental conditions (temperature: 23°C ± 2°C; humidity: 50% ± 10%; 12‐h light/dark cycle), with free access to standard chow diet and water. Genotyping was performed by PCR using the primer sequences listed in Table S1.
4.3. Diet‐Induced Obesity (DIO) Mouse Models
Male Nmi knockout (Nmi−/− ) mice and their wild‐type littermate controls (referred to as wild‐type, WT or Nmi+/+ ) were generated as described above. Littermate mice of the same sex and age were used as controls in all experiments. Unless otherwise specified, mice were maintained at ambient room temperature (23°C ± 2°C) under a 12‐h light/dark cycle, with free access to water and food. Nmi−/− and Nmi+/+ mice were fed a standard chow diet until 8 weeks of age and then randomly assigned to either a normal chow diet (NCD) group or a high‐fat diet (HFD) group. The HFD contained 60% kcal from fat, 20% kcal from carbohydrate, and 20% kcal from protein (5.42 kcal g−1; D12492; Research Diets, USA). The control NCD contained 10% kcal from fat (3.85 kcal g−1; D12450J; Research Diets, USA). Both diets were fed for 12 consecutive weeks. Body weight (BW) was measured weekly at the same time of day.
4.4. Intraperitoneal Glucose Tolerance Test (GTT) and Insulin Tolerance Test (ITT)
The GTT and ITT were performed at designated time points. Mice were fasted for 15 h (from 18:00 to 09:00) prior to IPGTT or for 6 h (from 09:00 to 15:00) prior to ITT. For GTT, glucose (2.0 g kg−1 BW; Sigma–Aldrich, USA) dissolved in sterile saline was administered by intraperitoneal injection. For ITT, insulin (0.75 U kg−1 BW; Novolin R, Denmark) was administered by intraperitoneal injection. Blood glucose levels were measured from the tail vein at baseline (0 min) and at 15‐, 30‐, 60‐, 90‐, and 120‐min post‐injection using a digital glucometer (Yuwell, China). The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated [67].
4.5. Energy Metabolism
Mice were individually housed in metabolic cages and acclimated for 24 h prior to data collection. To minimize stress‐induced artifacts, mice were first habituated to the experimental room for 3 days and then to the metabolic cages for 24 h, with the acclimation period excluded from analysis. Energy metabolism parameters were measured using a Promethion metabolic system (Sable Systems International, USA). The 48‐h measurement period was designed to ensure a stable metabolic state [68]. During the measurement period, oxygen consumption (VO2), carbon dioxide production (VCO2), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), food intake, and locomotor activity were recorded continuously at 5‐min intervals. As previously described, VO2, VCO2, and energy expenditure were normalized to BW [69, 70].
4.6. Food Intake
Spontaneous food intake was measured in free‐feeding, individually caged mice after a 24‐h acclimation period, as previously described [69]. At the beginning of the measurement period, an equal amount of fresh food (corresponding to each mouse's respective diet: NCD or HFD) was provided to each mouse. After 24 h, food remnants and spillage were collected and weighed. Food intake was calculated by subtracting the weight of the remnants and spillage from the initial food amount provided.
4.7. Body Composition
Body composition, including fat mass and lean mass, was evaluated at the end of the 12‐week dietary intervention using magnetic resonance imaging (EchoMRITM‐100, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Mice were measured in the conscious state without anesthesia. The instrument was calibrated daily using a standard reference sample provided by the manufacturer.
4.8. Thermoneutrality and Cold Exposure Tests
Male Nmi−/− and Nmi+/+ mice aged 8 weeks were individually housed at thermoneutrality (30°C) for 3 days prior to acute cold exposure. For cold exposure, mice were transferred to a 4°C environmental chamber without food but with free access to drinking water. Core body temperature was measured serially at 0 (baseline), 1, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after cold exposure initiation using a rectal thermometer (FT3400, China). The probe was inserted 2 cm into the rectum with a small amount of lubricant. Surface temperature was also assessed at the 24‐h endpoint using a Fluke Ti480U infrared thermography camera (Fluke Corporation, USA) in a non‐invasive manner. Mice were euthanized if body temperature decreased by 10°C from baseline in accordance with IACUC‐approved humane endpoints.
4.9. RNA Extraction and Real‐Time Quantitative PCR (qPCR)
At the end of the experiments, mice were euthanized. Following confirmation of death, brown adipose tissue (BAT), scWAT, epididymal white adipose tissue (eWAT), perirenal white adipose tissue (pWAT), and the liver were rapidly excised, weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C for subsequent analyses.
Total RNA was extracted from tissues or cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). RNA concentration and purity were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and RNA integrity was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Subsequently, 1 µg of RNA was reverse‐transcribed into cDNA using the PrimeScript RT kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. qPCR was performed using SYBR Green Master Mix on a QuantStudio 7 Flex Real‐Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Gene expression levels were normalized to the housekeeping gene Rn18s (18S ribosomal RNA) using the ΔΔCt method and are expressed as fold changes relative to the control. Primer sequences are listed in Table S2.
4.10. RNA Sequencing and Data Analysis
RNA sequencing was outsourced to Berry Genomics Co., Ltd. The RNA quality of BAT from Nmi+/+ and Nmi−/− mice (n = 4 per genotype) was assessed using an Agilent TapeStation prior to library preparation. Sequencing libraries were constructed using the TruSeq RNA Sample Prep Kit v2 (Illumina) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Library quality and fragment size were verified using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent). The normalized libraries were then pooled and sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform to generate 150 bp single‐end reads with barcode multiplexing, generating approximately 60 million reads per sample. RNA‐seq data analysis was performed using the OmicShare platform (https://www.omicshare.com/tools) [71].
4.11. Histological and Morphological Analysis
Tissue samples of liver and adipose tissue were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 24 h, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned into 4‐µm slices. After deparaffinization in xylene and rehydration through a graded ethanol series, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) for general morphological observation. For immunohistochemical analysis, the sections were subjected to antigen retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 95°C–100°C for 20 min. Subsequently, endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched by incubating the sections with 3% H2O2 for 15 min, followed by blocking with 5% goat serum for 1 h. The sections were then incubated with a primary antibody overnight at 4°C. Staining was performed using an ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, USA), followed by counterstaining with Harris hematoxylin. Images were acquired using a ZEISS microscope (Axio Imager Z2, Germany).
4.12. Western Blot Analysis and Antibodies
Tissues or cells were lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology,China) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). Total protein concentration was determined using a bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (Beyotime Biotechnology, China). Equal amounts of protein were boiled in loading buffer and separated on 10% or 12.5% SDS‐polyacrylamide gels, followed by transfer onto 0.2 µm PVDF membranes (Immobilon‐PSQ, Merck). The membranes were blocked with 5% non‐fat milk or bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washing three times with TBST (10 min per wash), the membranes were incubated with HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies for 1–2 h at room temperature. The antibodies used were: α‐tubulin (Ray antibody, Cat#RM2007), β‐actin (Proteintech, Cat#66009), UCP1 (Abcam, Cat#ab209483), HSP90 (Proteintech, Cat#13171‐1‐AP), PPARα (Proteintech, Cat#66826), PPARγ (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat#2435), NMI (Servicebio, Cat#GB114586), p‐IRF3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat#29047), IRF3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat#4302), Anti‐rabbit IgG HRP‐linked Antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, 7074S), Anti‐mouse IgG HRP‐linked Antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, 7076S). After incubation with the HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies, reactive bands were visualized using an ECL Plus Western Blotting Kit (Pierce Biotechnology, USA) and an ultrasensitive multifunctional iBright 1500 Imaging System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The relative intensity of the reactive bands was analyzed using ImageJ software.
4.13. Primary Adipocyte Culture
Adipose tissue was isolated from 4 to 5‐week‐old male Nmi−/− mice and their Nmi+/+ littermate controls and was immediately minced according to a previously described methods for isolating and culturing primary stromal vascular fraction (SVF) cells [72, 73, 74]. The tissue fragments were then digested with type II collagenase (Sigma, USA) for 30–45 min to obtain a homogeneous single‐cell suspension, which was subsequently filtered through a 40‐µm cell strainer. After centrifugation at 500–600 × g for 10 min at 4°C, the cell pellet was suspended in complete Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin‐streptomycin and seeded onto culture plates. The differentiation program for the SVF cells was initiated according to the previously described method [73].
4.14. Cell Culture
The mouse‐derived 3T3‐L1 preadipocyte cell line was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, CL‐173, USA). Cells were maintained in DMEM (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin‐streptomycin. Cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator with 5% CO2.
4.15. Adipocyte Differentiation
3T3‐L1 preadipocytes or primary adipocytes (passages ≤ P4) were induced to differentiate 2 days after reaching confluence, with this time point designated as Day 0. The differentiation induction medium contained insulin (5 µg mL−1), dexamethasone (1 µm), 3‐isobutyl‐1‐methylxanthine (0.5 mm), indomethacin (125 nm), triiodothyronine (1 nm), and rosiglitazone (1 µm). From Day 2, the medium was replaced with maintenance medium containing insulin (5 µg mL−1), triiodothyronine (1 nM), and rosiglitazone (1 µm), and was changed every other day. Fully differentiated adipocytes were harvested on Days 6–8.
4.16. In Vitro Compounds Treatment
To investigate the roles of PPARα, PPARγ, IRF3 signaling, differentiated mature adipocytes were treated with GW6471 (a PPARα antagonist; Selleck, Cat#S2798, 10 µm), GW9662 (a PPARγ antagonist; Selleck, Cat#S2915, 10 µm), poly(I:C) (an IRF3 phosphorylation inducer; MedChemExpress, Cat#HY‐107202, 50 mg mL−1), or amlexanox (an IRF3 inhibitor; MedChemExpress, Cat#HY‐B0713, 50 µm) for 24–48 h (GW6471 and GW9662) or 1 h (poly(I:C) and amlexanox), after which the cells were harvested for RNA and protein analysis.
4.17. Recombinant NMI Protein
The full‐length mNMI protein was expressed in E. coli strain BL21 (DE3). Bacterial cells were harvested by centrifugation at 1500 × g for 10 min post‐expression. The pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (20 mm Tris at pH 8.0, 400 mM NaCl) and lysed by sonication. The lysate was then centrifuged at 12 000 × g for 30 min to separate insoluble debris. The clarified supernatant was applied to a Ni‐NTA affinity column (Qiagen) and washed extensively with elution buffer (20 mm Tris at pH 8.0, 150 mm NaCl, 50 mm imidazole). The recombinant protein was eluted using an elution buffer (20 mm Tris at pH 8.0, 150 mm NaCl, 500 mm imidazole). Further purification was performed by gel filtration on a Superdex 200 column (Cytiva) using the lysis buffer on an FPLC system, as described previously [30]. Endotoxins were subsequently removed via PMB chromatography.
4.18. Oil Red O Staining
Oil Red O staining was performed as previously reported [9]. A 0.5% (mg v−1) Oil Red O stock solution in isopropanol was diluted with water (3:2) and filtered through a 0.45‐µm filter. Differentiated adipocytes were washed three times with PBS and fixed with 4% PFA for 30 min. The fixed cells were then incubated with the filtered Oil Red O solution at room temperature for 1 h to visualize lipid droplets. After washing with PBS, 100% isopropanol was added as an extraction solvent to elute the stained dye from the cells. The absorbance of the extracted dye was measured at 510 nm using a BioTek Epoch2 microplate reader.
4.19. Nmi Neutralizing Antibody Treatment
Monoclonal antibody‐mediated neutralization of NMI (mAb‐NMI) was prepared in the laboratory according to the classical monoclonal hybridoma technique [31, 75]. Each mouse was intravenously injected with 100 µg (10 mg kg−1) mAb‐NMI in 100 µL sterile phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). The injections were administered twice weekly, commencing at the onset of the dietary intervention.
4.20. Flow Cytometry Sorting
Single‐cell suspensions were prepared from mice fed either an NCD or HFD according to the aforementioned SVF isolation method [72, 73, 74] and filtered through a 40‐µm cell strainer. Cells were resuspended in PBS containing 1% BSA and stained with the specified antibodies for 30 min on ice. For intracellular marker staining, cells were first fixed with fixation buffer (Biolegend, USA, Cat#420801) at 4°C for 30 min, followed by incubation with antibodies diluted in intracellular permeabilization wash buffer (Biolegend, USA, Cat#421002). The following antibodies were used: FITC‐conjugated anti‐mouse CD45 (Cat#157214) and PerCP/Cy5.5‐conjugated anti‐mouse F4/80 (Cat#123128). Cell sorting was performed using a CytoFLEX SRT cell sorter (Beckman, USA). The corresponding CD45‐positive (CD45+) and CD45‐negative (CD45−) cell populations were collected and analyzed using FlowJo software (v10.5.3).
4.21. Statistical Analysis
All data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Unless otherwise stated, all in vitro studies were performed with at least three independent replicates. For qPCR data, normalization was performed using the ΔΔCt method with Rn18s as the internal reference gene. Sample sizes (n) for each statistical analysis are indicated in the respective figure legends. Depending on the experimental design, statistical significance was assessed using paired or unpaired two‐tailed Student's t‐tests for two‐group comparisons, or one‐way or two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni's post hoc test where appropriate for multiple comparisons. The significance level (alpha value) was set at 0.05. A p‐value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001; ns, not significant). All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software.
Author Contributions
Ting‐Ting Li: conceptualization, formal analysis, software, data curation, methodology, writing – original draft, and writing – review and editing. Xin‐Yuan Zhao: conceptualization, formal analysis, software, data curation, methodology, writing – review and editing. Min Zhang: conceptualization, formal analysis, software. Zhuang‐Feng Weng: conceptualization, formal analysis, software, funding acquisition. Xiao‐Ran Guo: software, data curation. Ying‐Fang Liu: conceptualization, formal analysis, software, data curation, methodology, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, project administration. Qiao‐Ping Wang: conceptualization, formal analysis, software, data curation, methodology, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, project administration. Huan‐Huan Liang: conceptualization, formal analysis, software, data curation, methodology, writing – review and editing, funding acquisition, project administration.
Fundings
This work was supported by National Key Program of China (project No. 2022YFE0210000, 2023YFC2606400), Shenzhen Science and Technology Planning Projec (ZDSYS20220606100803007), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82373883, 82071346, 32271321), Pearl River Talent Plan Innovation and Entrepreneurship Team Project of Guangdong Province (2019ZT08Y464), Technology and Innovation Bureau of Shenzhen Municipality (202109293000005), Key Fundamental Research Projects of Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan (JCYJ20220818102017035), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2023A1515010245), Shenzhen Medical Research Fund (D2403006), Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen, China (JCYJ20240813151248062).
Ethics Approvals
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Sun Yat‐sen University (Approval No. SYSU‐IACUC‐2023‐001743).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting File: advs75921‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Jingjing Wang and Dr. Jihua Zhang for their valuable advice. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Research and DevelopmentProgram of China (project No. 2022YFE0210000, 2023YFC2606400), the Shenzhen Science and Technology Planning Project (ZDSYS20220606100803007), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82373883, 82071346, 32271321), the Pearl River Talent Plan Innovation and Entrepreneurship Team Project of Guangdong Province (2019ZT08Y464), the Technology and Innovation Bureau of Shenzhen Municipality (202109293000005), the Key Fundamental Research Projects of Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan (JCYJ20220818102017035), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (2023A1515010245), the Shenzhen Medical Research Fund (D2403006), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (T2541044), and the Science and Technology Innovation Committee of Shenzhen, China (JCYJ20240813151248062).
Contributor Information
Ying‐Fang Liu, Email: liuyingfang@ibp.ac.cn.
Qiao‐Ping Wang, Email: wangqp7@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Huan‐Huan Liang, Email: lianghh26@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Collaborators G B D a B , “Global, Regional, and National Prevalence of Adult Overweight and Obesity, 1990–2021, with forecasts to 2050: A forecasting study for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” Lancet 405, no. 10481 (2025): 813–838, 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00355-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sattar N., McMurray J. J. V., McInnes I. B., Aroda V. R., and Lean M. E. J., “Treating Chronic Diseases Without Tackling Excess Adiposity Promotes Multimorbidity,” The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 11, no. 1 (2023): 58–62, 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00317-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Elmaleh‐Sachs A., Schwartz J. L., Bramante C. T., Nicklas J. M., Gudzune K. A., and Jay M., “Obesity Management in Adults,” Jama 330, no. 20 (2023): 2000–2015, 10.1001/jama.2023.19897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lowell B. B. and Spiegelman B. M., “Towards a Molecular Understanding of Adaptive Thermogenesis,” Nature 404, no. 6778 (2000): 652–660, 10.1038/35007527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sun Y., Zhang J., Hong J., et al., “Human RSPO1 Mutation Represses Beige Adipocyte Thermogenesis and Contributes to Diet‐Induced Adiposity,” Advanced Science 10, no. 12 (2023): 2207152, 10.1002/advs.202207152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zhou H., Peng X., Hu J., et al., “DsbA‐L deficiency in T Cells Promotes Diet‐induced Thermogenesis Through Suppressing IFN‐γ Production,” Nature Communications 12, no. 1 (2021): 326, 10.1038/s41467-020-20665-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Liu J., Wang Y., and Lin L., “Small Molecules for Fat Combustion: Targeting Obesity,” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 9, no. 2 (2019): 220–236, 10.1016/j.apsb.2018.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Shen H., He T., Wang S., et al., “SOX4 Promotes Beige Adipocyte‐mediated Adaptive Thermogenesis by Facilitating PRDM16‐PPARγ Complex,” Theranostics 12, no. 18 (2022): 7699–7716, 10.7150/thno.77102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Chen S., Liu X., Peng C., et al., “The Phytochemical Hyperforin Triggers Thermogenesis in Adipose Tissue Via a Dlat‐AMPK Signaling Axis to Curb Obesity,” Cell Metabolism 33, no. 3 (2021): 565–580, 10.1016/j.cmet.2021.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wang Q., Li D., Cao G., et al., “IL‐27 Signalling Promotes Adipocyte Thermogenesis and Energy Expenditure,” Nature 600, no. 7888 (2021): 314–318, 10.1038/s41586-021-04127-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Soták M. S., Clark M., Suur B. E., and Börgeson E., “Inflammation and Resolution in Obesity,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology 21, no. 1 (2025): 45–61, 10.1038/s41574-024-01047-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Schleh M. W., Caslin H. L., Garcia J. N., et al., “Metaflammation in Obesity and Its Therapeutic Targeting,” Science Translational Medicine 15, no. 723 (2023): adf9382, 10.1126/scitranslmed.adf9382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Nicchio I. G., Cirelli T., Quil L. C. D. C., Camilli A. C., Scarel‐Caminaga R. M., and Leite F. R. M., “Understanding the Peroxisome Proliferator‐activated Receptor Gamma (PPAR‐γ) Role in Periodontitis and Diabetes mellitus: A Molecular Perspective,” Biochemical Pharmacology 237 (2025): 116908, 10.1016/j.bcp.2025.116908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Daynes R. A. and Jones D. C., “Emerging Roles of PPARS in Inflammation and Immunity,” Nature Reviews Immunology 2, no. 10 (2002): 748–759, 10.1038/nri912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Yang C.‐C., Wu C.‐H., Lin T.‐C., et al., “Inhibitory Effect of PPARγ on NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation,” Theranostics 11, no. 5 (2021): 2424–2441, 10.7150/thno.46873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bertheloot D. and Latz E., “HMGB1, IL‐1α, IL‐33 and S100 Proteins: Dual‐function Alarmins,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology 14, no. 1 (2017): 43–64, 10.1038/cmi.2016.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Murao A., Aziz M., Wang H., Brenner M., and Wang P., “Release Mechanisms of Major DAMPs,” Apoptosis 26, no. 3‐4 (2021): 152–162, 10.1007/s10495-021-01663-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Broz P., “Unconventional Protein Secretion by Gasdermin Pores,” Seminars in Immunology 69 (2023): 101811, 10.1016/j.smim.2023.101811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Zhang J., Zhang L., Zhang S., et al., “HMGB1, an Innate Alarmin, Plays a Critical Role in Chronic Inflammation of Adipose Tissue in Obesity,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 454 (2017): 103–111, 10.1016/j.mce.2017.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Garcia‐Martinez I., Shaker M. E., and Mehal W. Z., “Therapeutic Opportunities in Damage‐Associated Molecular Pattern‐Driven Metabolic Diseases,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 23, no. 17 (2015): 1305–1315, 10.1089/ars.2015.6383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ahmad Z., Kahloan W., and Rosen E. D., “Transcriptional Control of Metabolism by Interferon Regulatory Factors,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology 20, no. 10 (2024): 573–587, 10.1038/s41574-024-00990-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yan S., Kumari M., Xiao H., et al., “IRF3 Reduces Adipose Thermogenesis Via ISG15‐mediated Reprogramming of Glycolysis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 131, no. 7 (2021): 148888, 10.1172/JCI144888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Kumari M., Wang X., Lantier L., et al., “IRF3 Promotes Adipose Inflammation and Insulin Resistance and Represses Browning,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 126, no. 8 (2016): 2839–2854, 10.1172/JCI86080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Hou J., Wang T., Xie Q., et al., “N‐Myc‐interacting Protein (NMI) Negatively Regulates Epithelial‐mesenchymal Transition by Inhibiting the Acetylation of NF‐kappaB/p65,” Cancer Letter 376, no. 1 (2016): 22–33, 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Brozzi F., Gerlo S., Grieco F. A., et al., “A Combined “Omics” Approach Identifies N‐Myc Interactor as a Novel Cytokine‐induced Regulator of IRE1α Protein and c‐Jun N‐terminal Kinase in Pancreatic Beta Cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 289, no. 30 (2014): 20677–20693, 10.1074/jbc.M114.568808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Hotamisligil G. S., “Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and the Inflammatory Basis of Metabolic Disease,” Cell 140, no. 6 (2010): 900–917, 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Huang S., Xing Y., and Liu Y., “Emerging roles for the ER stress sensor IRE1α in metabolic regulation and disease,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 294, no. 49 (2019): 18726–18741, 10.1074/jbc.REV119.007036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Fu S., Watkins S. M., and Hotamisligil G. S., “The Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum in Hepatic Lipid Homeostasis and Stress Signaling,” Cell Metabolism 15, no. 5 (2012): 623–634, 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Chen Y., Wu Z., Huang S., et al., “Adipocyte IRE1α promotes PGC1α mRNA decay and restrains adaptive thermogenesis,” Nature Metabolism 4, no. 9 (2022): 1166–1184, 10.1038/s42255-022-00631-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Xiahou Z., Wang X., Shen J., et al., “NMI and IFP35 serve as proinflammatory DAMPs During cellular infection and injury,” Nature Communications 8, no. 1 (2017): 950, 10.1038/s41467-017-00930-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Jing X., Yao Y., Wu D., et al., “IFP35 Family Proteins Promote Neuroinflammation and Multiple Sclerosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 32 (2021): 2103240118, 10.1073/pnas.2102642118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Cutler H. B., Jall‐Rogg S., Thillainadesan S., et al., “Cold Exposure Stimulates Cross‐tissue Metabolic Rewiring to Fuel Glucose‐dependent Thermogenesis in Brown Adipose Tissue,” Science Advances 11, no. 24 (2025): adt7369, 10.1126/sciadv.adt7369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Marlatt K. L. and Ravussin E., “Brown Adipose Tissue: An Update on Recent Findings,” Current Obesity Reports 6, no. 4 (2017): 389–396, 10.1007/s13679-017-0283-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Huo C., Song Z., Yin J., et al., “Effect of Acute Cold Exposure on Energy Metabolism and Activity of Brown Adipose Tissue in Humans: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Frontiers in Physiology 13 (2022): 917084, 10.3389/fphys.2022.917084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chung K.‐J., Chatzigeorgiou A., Economopoulou M., et al., “A Self‐sustained Loop of Inflammation‐driven Inhibition of Beige Adipogenesis in Obesity,” Nature Immunology 18, no. 6 (2017): 654–664, 10.1038/ni.3728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Kazak L., Chouchani E. T., Jedrychowski M. P., et al., “A Creatine‐Driven Substrate Cycle Enhances Energy Expenditure and Thermogenesis in Beige Fat,” Cell 163, no. 3 (2015): 643–655, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.09.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kim D., Kim J.‐H., Kang Y.‐H., et al., “Suppression of Brown Adipocyte Autophagy Improves Energy Metabolism by Regulating Mitochondrial Turnover,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, no. 14 (2019): 3520, 10.3390/ijms20143520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Yan S., Santoro A., Niphakis M. J., et al., “Inflammation Causes Insulin Resistance in Mice via Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 (IRF3)‐mediated Reduction in FAHFA Levels,” Nature Communications 15, no. 1 (2024): 4605, 10.1038/s41467-024-48220-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Shi H., Kokoeva M. V., Inouye K., Tzameli I., Yin H., and Flier J. S., “TLR4 links innate immunity and fatty acid–induced insulin resistance,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 116, no. 11 (2006): 3015–3025, 10.1172/JCI28898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Bae J., Ricciardi C. J., Esposito D., et al., “Activation of Pattern Recognition Receptors in Brown Adipocytes Induces Inflammation and Suppresses Uncoupling Protein 1 Expression and Mitochondrial Respiration,” American Journal of Physiology‐Cell Physiology 306, no. 10 (2014): C918–C930, 10.1152/ajpcell.00249.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kochumon S., Arefanian H., Azim R., et al., “Stearic Acid and TNF‐α Co‐Operatively Potentiate MIP‐1α Production in Monocytic Cells via MyD88 Independent TLR4/TBK/IRF3 Signaling Pathway,” Biomedicines 8, no. 10 (2020): 403, 10.3390/biomedicines8100403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Shimizu T., Yamakuchi M., Biswas K. K., et al., “HMGB1 is secreted by 3T3‐L1 adipocytes Through JNK signaling and the secretion is partially inhibited by adiponectin,” Obesity 24, no. 9 (2016): 1913–1921, 10.1002/oby.21549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Gunasekaran M. K., Viranaicken W., Girard A.‐C., et al., “Inflammation Triggers High Mobility Group Box 1 (HMGB1) Secretion in Adipose Tissue, a Potential Link to Obesity,” Cytokine 64, no. 1 (2013): 103–111, 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Guzmán‐Ruiz R., Ortega F., Rodríguez A., et al., “Alarmin High‐mobility Group B1 (HMGB1) is Regulated in Human Adipocytes in Insulin Resistance and Influences Insulin Secretion in β‐cells,” International Journal of Obesity 38, no. 12 (2014): 1545–1554, 10.1038/ijo.2014.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Zhu Y., Yang R., Deng Z., et al., “Adipose Tissue‐Resident Sphingomonas Paucimobilis Suppresses Adaptive Thermogenesis by Reducing 15‐HETE Production and Inhibiting AMPK Pathway,” Advanced Science 11, no. 47 (2024): 2310236, 10.1002/advs.202310236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Stanford K. I., Middelbeek R. J. W., Townsend K. L., et al., “Brown adipose tissue regulates glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity,” Journal of Clinical Investigation 123, no. 1 (2013): 215–223, 10.1172/JCI62308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Franz S., Ertel A., Engel K. M., Simon J. C., and Saalbach A., “Overexpression of S100A9 in Obesity Impairs Macrophage Differentiation via TLR4‐NFkB‐signaling Worsening Inflammation and Wound Healing,” Theranostics 12, no. 4 (2022): 1659–1682, 10.7150/thno.67174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Liu P., Huang G., Cao Z., et al., “Haematopoietic TLR4 Deletion Attenuates Perivascular Brown Adipose Tissue Inflammation in Atherosclerotic Mice,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular and Cell Biology of Lipids 1862, no. 9 (2017): 946–957, 10.1016/j.bbalip.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Hsu J. C.‐N., Chiu K.‐T., Chen C.‐H., Wang C.‐H., Shyue S.‐K., and Lee T.‐S., “HMGB1 Regulates Adipocyte Lipolysis via Caveolin‐1 Signaling: Implications for Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 9 (2025): 4222, 10.3390/ijms26094222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Montes V. N., Subramanian S., and Goodspeed L., “Anti‐HMGB1 Antibody Reduces Weight Gain in Mice Fed a High‐fat Diet,” Nutrition & Diabetes 5, no. 6 (2015): 161, 10.1038/nutd.2015.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Guzmán‐Ruiz R., Tercero‐Alcázar C., López‐Alcalá J., Sánchez‐Ceinos J., Malagón M. M., and Gordon A., “The Potential Role of the Adipokine HMGB1 in Obesity and Insulin Resistance. Novel Effects on Adipose Tissue Biology,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 536 (2021): 111417, 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Zemskov E. A., Zemskova M. A., Wu X., et al., “Novel Mechanism of Cyclic Nucleotide Crosstalk Mediated by PKG‐dependent Proteasomal Degradation of the Hsp90 Client Protein Phosphodiesterase 3A,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 300, no. 10 (2024): 107723, 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Cen X., Nitta A., Ohya S., et al., “An Analog of a Dipeptide‐Like Structure of FK506 Increases Glial Cell Line‐Derived Neurotrophic Factor Expression Through cAMP Response Element‐Binding Protein Activated by Heat Shock Protein 90/Akt Signaling Pathway,” The Journal of Neuroscience 26, no. 12 (2006): 3335–3344, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5010-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Chen J. Y., Parekh M., Seliman H., et al., “Heat Shock Promotes Inclusion Body Formation of Mutant Huntingtin (mHtt) and Alleviates mHtt‐induced Transcription Factor Dysfunction,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 293, no. 40 (2018): 15581–15593, 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Du O., Wu C., Yang Y.‐X., et al., “High Mobility Group Box 1, a Novel Serotonin Receptor‐7 Negative Modulator, Contributes to M2 Microglial Ferroptosis and Neuroinflammation in Post‐stroke Depression,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine 237 (2025): 666–683, 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2025.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Xu L., Ma X., Bagattin A., and Mueller E., “The transcriptional coactivator PGC1α protects Against hyperthermic stress via cooperation With the heat shock factor HSF1,” Cell Death & Disease 7, no. 2 (2016): 2102, 10.1038/cddis.2016.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Li M., Wu C., Guo H., Chu C., Hu M., and Zhou C., “Mangiferin Improves Hepatic Damage‐associated Molecular Patterns, Lipid Metabolic Disorder and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Alcohol Hepatitis Rats,” Food & Function 10, no. 6 (2019): 3514–3534, 10.1039/C9FO00153K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Qi W., Zhu S., Feng L., et al., “Integrated Analysis of the Transcriptome and Microbial Diversity in the Intestine of Miniature Pig Obesity Model,” Microorganisms 12, no. 2 (2024): 369, 10.3390/microorganisms12020369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Zhang Y., Qi J., Zhao J., et al., “Effect of Dietetic Obesity on Testicular Transcriptome in Cynomolgus Monkeys,” Genes 14, no. 3 (2023): 557–569, 10.3390/genes14030557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Puigserver P., Wu Z., Park C. W., Graves R., Wright M., and Spiegelman B. M., “A Cold‐Inducible Coactivator of Nuclear Receptors Linked to Adaptive Thermogenesis,” Cell 92, no. 6 (1998): 829–839, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81410-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Nakamura M. T., Yudell B. E., and Loor J. J., “Regulation of Energy Metabolism by Long‐chain Fatty Acids,” Progress in Lipid Research 53 (2014): 124–144, 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Zhu M.‐H., John S., Berg M., and Leonard W. J., “Functional Association of Nmi With Stat5 and Stat1 in IL‐2‐ and IFN γ‐Mediated Signaling,” Cell 96, no. 1 (1999): 121–130, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80965-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Rammes A., Roth J., Goebeler M., Klempt M., Hartmann M., and Sorg C., “Myeloid‐related Protein (MRP) 8 and MRP14, Calcium‐binding Proteins of the S100 Family, Are Secreted by Activated Monocytes via a Novel, Tubulin‐dependent Pathway,” Journal of Biological Chemistry 272, no. 14 (1997): 9496–9502, 10.1074/jbc.272.14.9496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Roglans N., Vilà L., Farré M., et al., “Impairment of hepatic Stat‐3 activation and reduction of PPARα activity in fructose‐fed rats,” Hepatology 45, no. 3 (2007): 778–788, 10.1002/hep.21499. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Han J. H., Jang K. W., and Myung C. S., “Garcinia Cambogia Attenuates Adipogenesis by Affecting CEBPB and SQSTM1/p62‐mediated Selective Autophagic Degradation of KLF3 Through RPS6KA1 and STAT3 Suppression,” Autophagy 18, no. 3 (2022): 518–539, 10.1080/15548627.2021.1936356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Li H., Dong M., Liu W., et al., “Peripheral IL‐6/STAT3 Signaling Promotes Beiging of White Fat,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Cell Research 1868, no. 10 (2021): 119080, 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2021.119080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. He X., Lai Q., Chen C., et al., “Both Conditional Ablation and Overexpression of E2 SUMO‐conjugating Enzyme (UBC9) in Mouse Pancreatic Beta Cells Result in Impaired Beta Cell Function,” Diabetologia 61, no. 4 (2018): 881–895, 10.1007/s00125-017-4523-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Zhao X.‐Y., Zhao B.‐C., Li H.‐L., et al., “MTCH2 Suppresses Thermogenesis by Regulating Autophagy in Adipose Tissue,” Advanced Science 12, no. 17 (2025): 2416598, 10.1002/advs.202416598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Zhao X.‐Y., Liu Y., Zhang X., et al., “The Combined Effect of Metformin and Mirabegron on Diet‐induced Obesity,” MedComm 4, no. 2 (2020): 207, 10.1002/mco2.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Loh K., Shi Y.‐C., Walters S., et al., “Inhibition of Y1 Receptor Signaling Improves Islet Transplant Outcome,” Nature Communications 8, no. 1 (2017): 490, 10.1038/s41467-017-00624-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Mu H., Chen J., Huang W., et al., “OmicShare tools: A Zero‐code Interactive Online Platform for Biological Data Analysis and Visualization,” Imeta 3, no. 5 (2024): 228, 10.1002/imt2.228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Lyu Z., Chan Y.‐T., Lu Y., et al., “Osteoprotegerin Mediates Adipogenesis in Obesity,” Journal of Advanced Research 62 (2024): 245–255, 10.1016/j.jare.2024.06.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Liu M., Bai J., He S., et al., “Grb10 Promotes Lipolysis and Thermogenesis by Phosphorylation‐Dependent Feedback Inhibition of mTORC1,” Cell Metabolism 19, no. 6 (2014): 967–980, 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Meng W., Liang X., Chen H., et al., “Rheb Inhibits Beiging of White Adipose Tissue via PDE4D5‐Dependent Downregulation of the cAMP‐PKA Signaling Pathway,” Diabetes 66, no. 5 (2017): 1198–1213, 10.2337/db16-0886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Li R., Wang J., Zhu F., et al., “HMGB1 regulates T Helper 2 and T helper17 Cell Differentiation both Directly and Indirectly in Asthmatic Mice,” Molecular Immunology 97 (2018): 45–55, 10.1016/j.molimm.2018.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting File: advs75921‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
