Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1970 Sep;14(2):185–198. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-185

Fractional punishment of fixed-ratio performance1

J F Dardano
PMCID: PMC1333719  PMID: 16811466

Abstract

Key-peck responses of pigeons under a fixed-rate 60 (Exp. I) or fixed-ratio 99 (Exp. II) schedule of positive reinforcement were punished by response-dependent electric shock during a segment of the ratio. The punishing stimulus was scheduled in one of three locations: the first third of the ratio, the middle third, or the final third. At high shock levels, the different loci of punishment differentially affected the typical fixed-ratio performance pattern. Post-reinforcement pauses were lengthened by all punishment conditions but to a greater degree when the responses in initial third of the ratio were punished. Disruption of responses before the punished segment of the ratio was a conspicuous feature of the performances when the middle or final third of the ratio was punished. Two of the punishment conditions produced similar effects on both fixed-ratio baselines but punishing the final third of the ratio suppressed the punished responses of the ratio only with the fixed-ratio 99 schedule. General effects of all punishment conditions included consistent intra-session recoveries of partially suppressed performances, the rapid recovery of the FR performances after the punishment dependency was removed after complete suppression, and the facilitation of overall and/or local response rates of most subjects by low-intensity shock.

Full text

PDF
185

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. DARDANO J. F., SAUERBRUNN D. AN AVERSIVE STIMULUS AS A CORRELATED BLOCK COUNTER IN FR PERFORMANCE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:37–43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. DARDANO J. F., SAUERBRUNN D. SELECTIVE PUNISHMENT OF FIXED-RATIO PERFORMANCE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 May;7:255–260. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HONIG W. K., SLIVKA R. M. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION OF THE EFFECTS OF PUNISHMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:21–25. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Honig W. K. The role of discrimination training in the generalization of punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):377–384. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LYON D. O. SOME NOTES ON CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION AND REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:289–291. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rilling M. Effects of timeout on a discrimination between fixed-ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Mar;11(2):129–132. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rilling M. Number of responses as a stimulus in fixed interval and fixed ratio schedules. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Feb;63(1):60–65. doi: 10.1037/h0024164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES