Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1970 Mar;13(2):145–160. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-145

Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats1

Michael Terman
PMCID: PMC1333756  PMID: 5494897

Abstract

Rats were trained to press one of two keys when a standard intensity value of a 4.0-kHz sine tone (70 or 100 db re 2 × 10−4 microbar) was presented from a centrally located loudspeaker. Pressing the other key was reinforced when comparison intensity values (as much as 30 db less than the standard value) were presented. The animals initiated tone presentations by breaking a light beam at the rear of the chamber. Correct choices produced brain-stimulation reinforcement, and errors produced a timeout. A procedure designed by Jenkins was used to partial out choice data under potential control of sequential cues in the stimulus series. When the standard-comparison intensity difference was varied, the rats showed similar psychometric functions despite wide differences in response bias (relative position preference). A signal detection analysis showed that response biases for individual animals remained fairly consistent during psychophysical testing. The trend of decreasing choice accuracy at small intensity differences was described by the cumulative normal probability function. The similarity of psychometric functions obtained with 70- and 100-db standards supported Weber's law. There was some evidence that response latencies were controlled by intensity differences even when choice behavior was undifferentiated.

Full text

PDF
145

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. ANGER D. The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Sep;52(3):145–161. doi: 10.1037/h0041255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fellows B. J. Chance stimulus sequences for discrimination tasks. Psychol Bull. 1967 Feb;67(2):87–92. doi: 10.1037/h0024098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HEINEMANN E. G., RUDOLPH R. L. THE EFFECT OF DISCRIMINATIVE TRAINING ON THE GRADIENT OF STIMULUS-GENERALIZATION. Am J Psychol. 1963 Dec;76:653–658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jenkins H. M. Measurement of stimulus control during discriminative operant conditioning. Psychol Bull. 1965 Nov;64(5):365–376. doi: 10.1037/h0022537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. LAWRENCE D. H. The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1952 Dec;45(6):511–516. doi: 10.1037/h0057135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mentzer T. L. Comparison of three methods for obtaining psychophysical thresholds from the pigeon. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1966 Feb;61(1):96–101. doi: 10.1037/h0022814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Moskowitz H., Kitzes L. A comparison of two psychophysical methods using animals. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):515–519. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nevin J. A. Effects of reinforcement scheduling on simultaneous discrimination performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 May;10(3):251–260. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Pierrel R., Sherman J. G., Blue S., Hegge F. W. Auditory discrimination: a three-variable analysis of intensity effects. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jan;13(1):17–35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. SPENCE K. W. The nature of the response in discrimination learning. Psychol Rev. 1952 Jan;59(1):89–93. doi: 10.1037/h0063067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stubbs A. The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):223–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. TEAS D. C., BITTERMAN M. E. Perceptual organization in the rat. Psychol Rev. 1952 Mar;59(2):130–140. doi: 10.1037/h0054771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Terman M. Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):145–160. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Terman M., Kling J. W. Discrimination of brightness differences by rats with food or brain-stimulation reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):29–37. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES