Skip to main content
Molecular Biomedicine logoLink to Molecular Biomedicine
. 2026 Jul 7;7:104. doi: 10.1186/s43556-026-00495-4

Hidradenitis suppurativa: epidemiology, diagnosis, molecular pathogenesis and therapy

Maria Grazia Lolli 1,#, Luca Sanna 1,#, Roberta Belli 1, Anna Dattolo 1, Luca Fania 2, Laura Colonna 2, Paolo Marchetti 3, Cristina Albanesi 1, Laura Mercurio 1,, Stefania Madonna 1,
PMCID: PMC13337992  PMID: 42410203

Abstract

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating inflammatory skin disease with a global prevalence ranging from 0.3–1%, characterized by recurrent nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts that culminate in irreversible tissue fibrosis. Despite its impact on patient quality of life, the transition from acute inflammation to chronic tissue remodeling remains poorly understood. Comorbidities frequently accompany skin alterations. HS pathogenesis is complex and involves innate immune cells, Th1/Th17-cell responses, and B-cell mechanisms, which lead to irreversible skin damage with tunnel formation. This review synthesizes current knowledge on HS epidemiology, clinical features and molecular mechanisms driving its development and progression, with a focus on the pathogenic role of adipose tissue, and specifically of adipokines, on inflammation and tissue destruction. We delineate how systemic metabolic dysfunction, often associated with obesity, synergizes with local inflammation to alter the balance between MMPs and their tissue inhibitors TIMPs, thus contributing to a perpetuating circle of inflammation and fibrosis. Furthermore, we explore the impact of conventional and targeted therapies on the interruption of broad or specific inflammatory and fibrotic pathways to reduce disease activity, and restore skin homeostasis. Vice versa, we illustrate how the dysregulated metabolic-inflammatory axes influence the therapeutic outcomes emphasizing how the adipose tissue microenvironment modulates the response to conventional and targeted therapies. Finally, we discuss how targeting the interplay between metabolic health and tissue destruction represents a promising frontier for preventing the permanent skin damage in advanced disease, offering the potential for more tailored and effective intervention strategies.

Keywords: Hidradenitis suppurativa, Epidemiology, Molecular pathogenesis, Obesity, ECM remodeling, Fibrosis, Therapies, Adipokines, Immunity

Introduction

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, debilitating inflammatory skin disease characterized by recurrent nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts that culminate in irreversible tissue fibrosis [1, 2]. The epidemiology of HS displays substantial geographic and demographic heterogeneity. Given an estimated global prevalence of around 1%, HS also has considerable socioeconomic relevance to society [35]. Indeed, HS has a considerable effect on the personal and professional lives of those affected, most of whom are young or middle-aged adults. In Europe and North America, the disease predominantly afflicts women, with incidence peaking between the second and fourth decades of life.

In recent years, important advancements have been made in HS research. The aetiology of HS is complex and multifactorial, involving genetic predisposition, environmental triggers like smoking, and significant systemic comorbidities, including metabolic, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and mood disorders. Obesity is the most frequent comorbid condition, affecting up to 75% of patients and acting as a systemic inflammatory amplifier [6]. Beyond standard cytokines, adipose tissue secretes specialized signaling proteins called adipokines, which regulate systemic inflammation, metabolism, and immune responses, thus contributing to HS development and progression [7, 8].

Disease severity evolves from recurrent nodules in acute forms to diffuse involvement with interconnected tunnels and extensive scarring in chronic phases. The poorly understood transition from acute inflammation to chronic and irreversible tissue remodeling remains a primary scientific gap. In the care of patients with HS, the fundamental gap is characterized by a significant delay in diagnosis and a subsequent "therapeutic lag" in receiving effective treatments. Patients often face a diagnostic delay of about 7–10 years from the onset of symptoms to an accurate diagnosis [9]. To this matter, robust genetic and proteomic biomarkers that could facilitate early differential diagnosis actually lack. Furthermore, biologics and advanced targeted therapies are frequently introduced only after years of less effective systemic treatments, allowing the disease to progress toward irreversible tissue damage. Of note, there is a 40–50% non-response rate to current biologics, which is largely driven by a lack of understanding regarding how complex genetic and metabolic profiles influence individual clinical outcomes [1]. In light of the emerging therapeutic strategies, further efforts should be addressed to the identification of biomarkers useful to predict the clinical outcomes in HS patients.

In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of HS, encompassing epidemiology, comorbidities, diagnostic strategies, molecular pathogenesis, and current standards of care. Building upon this foundation, we synthesize emerging insights into genetic predisposition, as well as into cellular and molecular players involved in HS pathogenesis, illustrating the complex immune-stromal framework to explain HS manifestation and progression. By linking metabolic dysfunction, and specifically obesity-related adipokines, to local inflammation and tissue destruction strongly sustained by metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their inhibitors (Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinases—TIMPs), we aim to outline translational strategies for precision-guided therapies in HS and to highlight future directions focused at integrating the influence of the "gut-skin axis" and metabolic factors on HS pathogenesis and the optimal response to drugs.

Epidemiology and clinical burden of HS

Geographical heterogeneity of HS

Epidemiology of HS displays substantial geographic and demographic heterogeneity. Global prevalence estimates typically range from 0.3–1%, though reports vary widely -from 0.001% to over 4%- largely due to methodological and diagnostic differences across studies [9].

A recent meta-analysis estimated a pooled global prevalence of approximately 0.99% [10]. In some parts of the world, HS predominantly afflicts women to men by a ratio of 3:1 and most often presents in young adults, with incidence peaking in the second to fourth decades of life [11]. In Europe and North America, HS is consistently female-predominant (≈2–3:1), whereas several East Asian studies report a male predominance, highlighting possible genetic or environmental modulators [12]. In the United States, population-based claims analyses indicate higher prevalence among Black individuals compared with White or Asian groups [13]. Regionally, epidemiologic data are strongest in Europe and North America, while reliable population-level studies remain limited in Africa, Latin America, and parts of Asia [14]. This disparity in HS prevalence may be attributed to socio-economic determinants that influence lifestyle factors, such as diet, smoking, wound care, and weight management [15].

In addition, geographic heterogeneity in HS prevalence likely reflects population-specific genetic architectures and differential exposure to environmental inflammatory triggers. These observations highlight the importance of integrating epidemiologic data with molecular profiling to identify population-specific pathogenic pathways and therapeutic targets.

Diagnosis, clinical features and disease severity assessment

HS is a chronic, recurrent, folliculo-centric inflammatory disease characterized by painful, deep-seated nodules, abscesses, draining tunnels (sinus tracts), and progressive scarring in intertriginous sites.

HS diagnosis is clinical and is based on the on the modified Dessau criteria, which include the observation of the typical lesions, their characteristic distribution, and the history of recurrence. Specifically, the primary lesions appear as single tender inflammatory nodules (1–2 cm in diameter), often mistaken for furuncles. They often begin as "blind boils" (meaning they lack a central pustular head) because the root inflammation sits deep within the hair follicle and dermis. These nodules can persist for weeks and develop into abscesses [16], accompanied by fluctuance, severe pain, and purulent drainage. The abscesses can evolve in elongated, purulent, fluctuant draining tracts (sinus tracts) beneath the skin, tombstone comedones, which manifest as multi-headed, open blackheads characteristic of chronic, damaged follicles, and progressively in hypertrophic scars in intertriginous sites, particularly the axillae, groin, perineal, and inframammary regions [17]. A second diagnostic criteria concerns lesions distribution, as HS has a strict predilection for intertriginous zones—areas where skin rubs against skin, rich in terminal hair follicles and apocrine sweat glands. Primary zones are axillae, inguinal folds (groin), perineum, perianal region, and buttocks. Inframammary and intermammary folds are highly common in women, while lesions can occasionally appear also on the neck, torso, or thighs.

Finally, the standard diagnostic threshold requires at least two recurrences within a 6-month period, or a continuous presence of lesions fluctuating in severity over months [18].

Once a diagnosis is confirmed, Hurley staging system (Hurley I-III) is typically used to classify the disease severity and the clinical course. Hurley I corresponds to recurrent nodules or abscesses without tunnels or scarring; Hurley II to widely separated recurrent abscesses with early sinus tracts and scarring; Hurley III to diffuse involvement with interconnected tunnels, extensive scarring, and chronic suppuration [18] (Fig. 1). As Hurley scoring does not allow a precise assessment of disease severity or improvement with drug treatment, there is a broad consensus to use the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), which is a validated score suitable for graded assessment of HS severity [19]. IHS4 is a sum of nodules (multiplied by one), abscesses (multiplied by two), and draining tunnels (multiplied by four), and it permits the classification of the disease severity as mild, moderate, and severe. The achievement of IHS4 reduction of 55% (IHS4-55), 75% (IHS4-75), and 90% (IHS4-90) is frequently used in clinical studies as endpoints [20].

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Representative clinical images illustrating Hurley disease severity stages in HS. The panel shows different types of Hurley Stages I, II and III of skin lesions in patients with HS. a Clinical presentation of a gluteal region in a female patient classified as Hurley stage I. The image shows solitary inflammatory nodule and pustule without sinus tract formation or scarring, localized to the gluteal region; b Hurley stage II disease in a female patient, characterized by two sinus tract formation localized in the axillary region. c Severe HS in a female patient classified as Hurley stage III. The image shows extensive sinus tract formation in the groin, with residual scarring and ulceration indicative of chronic and previous inflammatory activity

However, while the Hurley Staging System remains the gold standard for clinical severity stratification, the field is increasingly integrating high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) to identify subclinical tunnels and inflammatory activity that escape visual inspection [21].

HS has a significant impact on physical, mental, social, and professional domains. The chronic nature of the disease often leads to unpredictable flare-ups, causing a lot of distress. Several scales and indices have been developed to evaluate the effect of HS on Quality of Life (QoL). These tools, like the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Quality of Life Index (HiSQOL), provide Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) that help to assess the severity of the condition, track treatment progress, and measure the psychological and functional burden of disease.

From a translational standpoint, the molecular complexity of HS highlights the urgent need for robust biomarkers of disease activity, progression, and therapeutic response. Integration of molecular biomarkers with clinical severity scores such as IHS4 may enable precision medicine approaches, optimizing patient stratification and guiding early, targeted intervention.

Risk factors and systemic comorbidities

HS is characterized by a complex and multifactorial etiology involving genetic predisposition, environmental triggers (i.e., stress), and behavioral factors (alcohol consumption, smoking), with a higher prevalence in women (ratio Female:Male 3:1) [22] (Fig. 2). Sex-specific differences are also evident in disease progression and comorbidity profiles, suggesting the role of sex-related hormones in HS pathology.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Risk factors and comorbidities associated with HS. Schematic representation of the risk factors and comorbidities associated with HS, with relative incidence percentages. HS is a systemic inflammatory disease with multifactorial etiology involving genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, and behavioral factors, with a higher prevalence in females. Obesity represents one of the major independent risk factors of HS and one of the most frequent comorbidities associated with the disease. In addition to obesity, the right panel of the scheme depicts the main comorbidities associated with HS. The Fig. highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of HS patients. Abbreviations: F, female; M, male; MI, myocardial infarction

Androgens (like testosterone) are often the primary drivers in HS. They stimulate the sebaceous glands and hair follicles, leading to increased oil production and follicular plugging—the initial step in an HS lesion.

In women many report "flares" tied to the menstrual cycle (specifically the premenstrual phase when estrogen drops and progesterone or androgen influence shifts), suggesting that even cyclical hormonal fluctuations can trigger inflammation. In men HS often presents with more severe "atypical" involvements, such as back and nuchal (neck) involvement, potentially due to higher systemic androgen levels, while in women lesions are more frequently found in the inguinal, submammary, and axillary regions. Sex hormones also influence the metabolic and endocrine systems, leading to different "side-kick" conditions. Women are more likely to have Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), central obesity, and thyroid issues. The insulin resistance associated with PCOS can further spike androgen levels, creating a feedback loop that worsens HS. Likely driven by a greater prevalence of tobacco use, men with HS show higher rates of cardiovascular disease and certain associated inflammatory conditions like squamous cell carcinoma [23]. Mechanical factors such as friction, mechanical pressure, and shear forces in intertriginous areas act as local triggers, promoting follicle rupture and subsequent spread of inflammation [24].

The most frequent comorbidity condition in HS is obesity, affecting up 50% to 75% of the HS patients and acting as a systemic inflammatory amplifier. It is considered an important independent factor in the development of HS and is associated with a higher prevalence of HS in children and adolescents [25]. Obesity exacerbates the inflammatory state and promotes follicular occlusion, while hyperlipidemia may amplify inflammation through oxidative stress and impaired immune resolution [4, 26] (Fig. 2). Indeed, the chronic low-grade inflammation associated with obesity can perpetuate the immune dysregulation characteristic of HS, by heightening Th17 signaling and increasing neutrophil recruitment [27]. In line with these observations, studies on bariatric surgery and significant weight loss (over 15% of body weight) have shown a direct correlation with reduced HS severity [15]. As a consequence of obesity, up to 50% of patients are affected by MetS, with insulin resistance up to of 77% regardless of disease duration, predisposing patients to type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension [28] (Fig. 2). Systemic inflammation inherent to HS can also critically alter lipid metabolism. This alteration promotes the hepatic overproduction of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and hinders the clearance of LDL particles. Elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines like TNF-α and IL-6 further impair lipid regulation, contributing to dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis through cytokine-mediated endothelial dysfunction [2931]. This compromised metabolic profile translates into a substantially increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke [32]. Recent evidence also identified a striking association with Metabolically Dysregulated-associated Steatotic liver disease (MASLD), which may affect up to 75% of patients [33]. HS also shares pathogenic pathways with immune-mediated diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly Crohn’s disease, and spondyloarthritis [34], reflecting common IL-23/Th17-driven mechanism [35] (Fig. 2). Other comorbidities include PCOS [36], sexual dysfunction, and ocular conditions such as scleritis and corneal ulcers [3739]. Finally, chronic inflammation associated to HS exposes patients to an increased risk of cancer, particularly squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and lymphomas [40] (Fig. 2).

Emerging evidence suggests that also psycho-neuro-endocrine pathways are significantly associated to HS pathophysiology [4, 41]. High rates of depression and anxiety are common (up to 42% of HS patients) at all levels of disease severity [42]. Other psychiatric disorders like schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and disordered eating behaviors link also to HS. Of note, disordered eating further contributes to obesity, inflammation, and disease progression [43]. Thus, the comprehensive management of HS should move from a skin-centric model to a prevention and multidisciplinary strategies focused on reducing the overall inflammatory burden, in particular obesity [44] to avoid irreversible tissue damage (Fig. 2).

Pathogenesis of HS: the complexity of molecular and cellular dysregulations

The pathogenesis of HS is a complex, multi-tiered, spatio-temporal process that bridges inherited genetic vulnerability with a highly destructive cellular cascade. This section explores how the disease evolves from upstream genetic and epigenetic predispositions to downstream, self-perpetuating tissue damage. First, we outline the genetic and epigenetic landscape that dictates the baseline reactivity and structural vulnerability of the cutaneous microenvironment. We then track how these molecular prompts orchestrate a dynamic immune-stromal transition, driving the cutaneous tissue through progressive clinical phases—from acute, reversible innate immune activation, through organized adaptive immunity and early dermal tunnel formation, to the irreversible, end-stage fibro-destructive loops that distort the skin architecture.

Genetic architecture, inheritance and epigenetic rewiring: upstream drivers of cellular dysregulation

Multiple factors are known to contribute to HS onset. Indeed, while environmental and lifestyle factors alongside hormonal influences contribute to its pathogenesis, the strong familial disease clustering suggests also a significant genetic susceptibility. Specifically, 30 to 40% of patients report to have a positive family history of disease even though the genetic basis of HS is still unclear. Many evidences identified, in a minor subset of patients, pathogenic variants with autosomal dominant inheritance and incomplete penetrance in genes encoding for components of the Gamma-secretase complex (GSC), an intramembrane protease complex that in skin primarily processes Notch receptors [45]. Specifically, loss of function variants identified in Nicastrin (NCSTN), Presenilin Enhancer 2 (PSENEN2), Presenilin 1 (PSEN1), Aph-1A and Aph-1B Gamma-Secretase Subunits (APH1A and APH1B) genes, lead to haplo-insufficiency that ultimately results in defective Notch signaling [4650]. Proper Notch pathway activation is a pivotal determinant for the regulation of skin homeostasis, keratinocytes differentiation, and the maintenance of the hair follicle, oil glands and skin appendages structure. Therefore, defective Notch pathway alters keratinocytes proliferation and differentiation program, compromises apocrine gland homoeostasis and switches the fate of outer root sheath hair follicle cells, converting it into keratin-enriched epidermal cysts, a typical phenotypic trait of HS [45, 51, 52]. Notch signaling also influences Treg development and function, so its deficiency further exacerbates the Th17/Treg imbalance present in HS [53]. Therefore, germline loss-of-function variants in the GSC subunits genes can directly trigger the clinical manifestation of HS by compromising Notch-mediated follicular integrity and immune homeostasis. However, only a very small fraction—approximately 5%—of familial HS cases follows Mendelian autosomal inheritance of monogenic dominant variants in GSC components genes. The vast majority of the disease's genetic architecture is non-Mendelian, driven by polygenic risk factors interacting with environmental triggers that remains largely uncharacterized [46, 48, 54].

Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) identified common genetic variants, specifically Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), associated with HS susceptibility, located in loci of SOX9 and KLF5 genes [55, 56]. In skin, SOX9 is involved in the development and maintenance of hair follicles and sebaceous glands homeostasis, in fibrosis processes and in the formation of sinus tracts, through the control hair follicle stem cells, all processes that result alerted in HS [57, 58]. KLF5 instead regulates the skin barrier, tissue regeneration, and keratinocyte differentiation. Alterations in KLF5 functions can cause excessive keratin production within the follicular duct, leading to comedones formation and follicular occlusion, which are typical features in HS. It also modulates the local immune response, and its dysfunction contributes to the typical persistent inflammation of HS patients [59]. In sporadic HS cases, GWAS identified common SNPs in HLA-DR loci and in the pro-inflammatory genes TNF-α, IL-23R, IL-12RB1 involved in the regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses. This polygenic landscape could modulate the threshold for self-perpetuating chronic inflammation and follicular occlusion, thereby predisposing to the development of HS. Variants in HLA-DR region can lead to an aberrant presentation of commensal skin microbiota or follicular auto-antigens to CD4+ T-cells facilitating the persistent recruitment of Th17 and Th1 cells into the perifollicular space [55, 60, 61].

Another crucial aspect of non-Mendelian HS predisposition involves epigenetic alterations that could be inherited or acquired through environmental factors like smoking and obesity. Epigenetic alterations associated to HS include chromatin remodeling and aberrant DNA methylation of cytokine genes (like IL-17F and CXCL10), that can result in a persistent and self-amplifying pro-inflammatory state even in the absence of a primary genetic variants [62, 63].

Despite growing insights, defining the complete genetic landscape in HS pathogenesis, remains to be fully elucidated as a critical area of investigation to fully characterize the disease’s pathophysiology and advance targeted therapeutic strategies. However, it is plausible that these hereditary genetic variations and epigenetic modifications dictate the baseline reactivity of the cutaneous microenvironment by priming local cell populations, and instigating the complex cellular crosstalk explored in the following section.

The immune-stromal landscape of HS: orchestrating the transition from innate activation to tertiary lymphoid structures and irreversible tissue alterations

The molecular mechanisms as well as cellular and immune contribution underlying HS pathogenesis, still remain incompletely defined, because of a severe lack of reliable preclinical models [64]. HS is a solely human disease and genetic mouse models, such as those with altered Notch signaling pathways, have shown multiple limitations, including the lack of altered immune responses and destructive tunnel-forming nature typically observed in human HS [64]. Therefore, human ex vivo models consisting of skin explants cultured in vitro have been developed to study HS pathogenesis, although they exhibit high donor variability often driven by the anatomical site from which they derive or intrinsic factors [64].

Lesional skin of HS patients is characterized by a heterogeneous inflammatory infiltrate, along with tissue damage, extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, and fibrosis [62, 65, 66]. The chronicization of initial inflammation and aberrant tissue repair, progressively disrupts skin cytoarchitecture and fibrosis [67].

The Hurley Stage I is the earliest phase of HS development, characterized by nodules and abscesses and it is dominated by acute inflammation where innate immune response drives the adaptive activation. It begins with the occlusion of the hair follicle, the consequent rapture of the pilosebaceous unit and the release of follicular contents, including keratin fragments, sebum, hair shaft remnants, microbial products, and cellular debris into the surrounding dermis resulting into inflammatory response and tissue damage (Fig. 3) [68]. These events act as a trigger that activates innate immune pathways through pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) expressed by keratinocytes [69], macrophages [70], and dendritic cells [62, 71]. Keratinocytes and macrophages respond by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-6, IL-23, and IL-36 family members together with chemokines including CXCL1 and CXCL8, thereby orchestrating the rapid recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes to the site of follicular injury [7274]. In this phase, macrophages shift toward pro-inflammatory CD68+ M1-phenotype [75] contributing to inflammation amplification that opposes wound healing. These cytokines promote T-helper CD4+ differentiation towards Th1 and Th17 subsets, significantly increased in HS lesions, which secrete IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, and IFN-γ cytokines [76, 77]. The activation of IL-17 signaling further induces the expression of CXCL1, CXCL8 and CCL20 in keratinocytes, thus sustaining leukocyte recruitment through self-reinforcing inflammatory feed-forward loops. In this phase, the action of immune infiltrate and keratinocytes contributes to ECM disruption and remodeling, by secreting MMPs, among which MMP-2, MMP-8 and MMP-9, and their modulators TIMPs. In this early stage of HS, subcutaneous adipose tissue also represents a key contributor of the disease pathogenic circuit. Indeed, adipose tissue acts as an endocrine immunological hub by secreting the pro-inflammatory adipokines leptin, visfatin and resistin with a concomitant decrease of the anti-inflammatory adipokine adiponectin (Fig. 3). These mediators sustain systemic and cutaneous immune activation, and induce the expression of MMPs and TIMPs, as well as of pro-fibrotic genes, thereby promoting inflammation, ECM remodeling and tissue fibrosis [78, 79]. However, in Hurley Stage I, tissue damage is still reversible and fibrosis is not yet present. This phase resembles the early inflammatory phase of wound healing, during which provisional matrix proteins as fibrin and fibronectin assemble into a scaffold stabilizing the injured site, providing a substrate for cellular migration and tissue healing [80].

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Molecular pathophysiology across Hurley stages of HS. In Hurley stage I, follicular occlusion of the pilo-sebaceous unit leads to rupture and dermal release of sebum, keratin, cellular debris, and bacteria, triggering an acute inflammatory response. The immune infiltrate primarily includes neutrophils, and DCs that lead the activation of Th1 and Th17 lymphocytes, monocytes, macrophages, and B cells. Key cytokines involved are IL-1β, TNF-α, IL-23, IL-17A/F, IL-6 and IL-36, IFN-γ, and IL-22. In parallel, the inflammatory milieu affects subcutaneous adipose tissue, promoting adipocyte release of pro-inflammatory adipokines as leptin, visfatin, and resistin, while decreasing anti-inflammatory adiponectin levels. Collectively, these events drive the formation of inflammatory nodules and abscesses. In Hurley stage II, the balance between MMP −2, −8, −9 and their tissue inhibitors TIMPs released by immune cells, keratinocytes, and fibroblasts activated by local inflammation, contributes to excessive ECM deposition, the increasing of ECM degradation biomarkers and tissue remodeling. This process favors the development of dermal tunnels enriched with immune infiltrates. Persistent inflammation, sustained by the continuous over-release of pro-inflammatory adipokines and cytokines, promotes early fibrotic changes and the onset of initial scarring typical of stage II. Hurley stage III is characterized by chronic, non-resolving inflammation driven by the persistent dysregulation of both pro-inflammatory cytokines and adipokines, together with defective wound healing. These mechanisms induce the transition of fibroblasts into activated myofibroblasts, which overproduce collagen type I and ECM components, leading to increased matrix stiffness and the establishment of a self-amplifying pro-fibrotic loop. The dysregulated activity of MMPs (−2, −8, −9) and TIMPs exacerbates tissue destruction, deepens dermal tunneling, and results in extensive fibrosis and scar formation typical of advanced Hurley stage III disease

The transitions from the acute phase of Hurley Stage I to a chronically self-sustaining inflammatory state, occurs with irreversible tissue damage when inflammatory signaling fails to resolve. This stage, called Hurley Stage II, is characterized by recurrent nodules and abscesses and the first signs of irreversible tissue alterations defined by the formation of early sinus tracts (dermal tunnels) and early fibrosis scarring [8183] (Fig. 3). Immunologically, in Hurley Stage II, the persistent action of pro-inflammatory M1 CD68+ macrophages impedes wound healing and drive the prolonged chronic inflammation [72] in which CD163⁺ macrophages with M2-like features emerge, implicated in ECM deposition and fibrotic remodeling [76, 77]. Integrated transcriptomic and immunohistochemical analyses demonstrated the persistence of the Th1 and Th17-associated cytokines IL-23, IL-17A and IL-17F in this stage. IL-36 family cytokines further amplify both Th1 and Th17 responses, reinforcing pathogenic immune circuits [77]. Moreover, IL-17A and TNF-α act synergistically to drive a marked upregulation of the chemokines CCL20 and CXCL8 sustaining leukocyte recruitment [4, 84]. B-lymphocytes and plasma cells emerge as important contributors to disease chronicity. Histological analyses and single-cell and spatial transcriptomic profiling reveal tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) in lesional HS skin, characterized by organized interactions among T cells, B cells, antigen-presenting cells, and stromal elements underscoring the transition from predominantly innate to organized adaptive immune responses in Stage II disease [67, 68] (Fig. 3).

Persistent inflammation and dysregulated adipokines production, associated with the unperturbed action of MMPs and TIMPs acting on ECM, prevent the wound healing. In this phase, dermal activated fibroblasts play a central role in tissue remodeling and fibrosis. Single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomic studies have recently identified distinct fibroblast subpopulations, including SFRP4⁺ and CXCL13⁺ [85], that modulate fibrosis [3]. CXCL13+ fibroblasts exhibit the most prominent expression of multiple MMPs, suggesting their direct contribution to tissue disruption and remodeling. Thus, MMPs activity in HS is not just a consequence of inflammation but is also tied to specific fibroblast phenotypes and dysregulated signaling pathways involving also subcutaneous adipose tissue within the HS skin microenvironment (Fig. 3). Activated fibroblasts also drive the upregulated deposition of ECM components in HS lesions, in part through the activated Hippo pathway, a pro-fibrotic driver in chronic HS [86]. Dermal fibroblasts progressively differentiate toward a myofibroblast phenotype [87], characterized by increased expression of contractile and ECM-associated genes such as ACTA2 and COL1A1 [88], that promote early sinus tracts formation and collagen accumulation. Thus, sinus tract formation and early fibrosis result as the outcome of the combined action of inflammation circuit, tissue disruption by MMPs and TIMPs with the simultaneous overproduction of ECM and pro-fibrotic components (Fig. 3).

The progression from Hurley Stage II to Stage III reflects the convergence of long-standing chronical inflammation, persistent dysregulations of fibroblasts and adipocytes and fibrosis spread. Hurley stage III, the most severe, is characterised by extensive irreversible tissue damages, advanced pervasive fibrosis, multiplication of sinus tracts and extension of scarring across the entire anatomical region [78] (Fig. 3). Hippo pathway dysregulation, detectable already in Stage II, is further amplified within expanded fibroblast populations, resulting in excessive collagen deposition and increased ECM stiffness that act on fibroblasts through mechano-transduction pathways, creating a "pro-fibrotic positive feedback loop" where the ECM mechanical properties enhance the fibrotic process. This leads to extended scar formation observed in typical HS skin architectural distortion [80, 8991]. Matrix remodeling is further amplified by inflammatory signaling driving MMPs activity, generating bioactive matrix fragments that amplify inflammation in a positive loop [77] (Fig. 3).

Immunologically, advanced lesions exhibit prominent TLS formation adjacent to sinus tracts, orchestrated by lymphoid-organizing chemokines such as CXCL13 and CCL19 [67]. Within these structures, B cells differentiate into plasma cells, supporting local antibody production and sustained antigen presentation that perpetuate the already present inflammation rather than promoting resolution [92]. Therefore, Hurley Stage III is characterized by a self-perpetuating microenvironment that maintains fibrosis, chronic inflammation, and tissue destruction in end-stage HS [77, 89, 91] (Fig. 3).

Inflammation, tissue remodeling and fibrosis in HS pathogenesis: the complex role of MMPs and TIMPs

The structural deconstruction and subsequent fibrotic scarring that define HS are fundamentally governed by a breakdown in ECM homeostasis. This section details the critical, dual-edged roles played by MMPs and their endogenous inhibitors, TIMPs, in driving this pathology. We examine the profound dysregulation of the gelatinases and collagenases MMP-2, −8, and −9, exploring how their hyper-activation transitions from localized tissue destruction—such as hair follicle rupture and sinus tract formation—to systemic inflammatory and metabolic complications. We also evaluate the counter-balancing network of TIMPs (1–4), establishing how a disruption in the delicate MMP:TIMP ratio shifts tissue dynamics from healthy physiological turnover to a self-perpetuating, maladaptive fibrotic epilogue. Together, these sections illuminate how an uncoupled remodeling apparatus transforms an acute inflammatory response into chronic, irreversible architectural distortion.

Dysregulation of MMP-2, −8, and −9 in HS: from localized matrix remodeling to systemic inflammatory and metabolic perturbations

Key players of inflammation, tissue remodelling and fibrosis in HS pathogenesis are MMPs. MMPs are a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases that degrade ECM components, while their activity is tightly controlled by their endogenous inhibitors, the TIMPs. MMPs are indispensable for physiological tissue remodeling processes [80]. Their canonical activity is the degradation of ECM proteins, even if they exhibit pleiotropic functions, modulating a diverse array of biological processes, such as cell migration, leukocyte activation and inflammatory responses [89, 92].

In HS, the expression and activity of MMP-2, −8 and −9 are significantly dysregulated [74, 93, 94] (Fig. 3, Table 1). MMP-2, also known as gelatinase A, is a zinc-dependent type IV collagenase [95] secreted as a proenzyme by fibroblasts and endothelial cells [96, 97]. Its substrates include gelatin, elastin, and various other types of collagens [98]. The role of MMP-2 in fibrosis is complex and can be contradictory depending on the tissue and disease stages [99]. For instance, in a rodent model of toxin-induced chronic liver injury, MMP-2 deficient mice demonstrated an almost twofold increase in liver fibrosis compared to wild-type mice [100], due to an enhanced type I collagen mRNA expression. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of MMP2 deficiency on the up-regulation of type I collagen remain to be deepened. In other cellular contexts, MMP-2 can play pro-fibrotic functions. For instance, in aortic rings and vascular smooth muscle cells of rat models MMP-2 activates TGF-β1 by engaging the SMAD signaling pathway, resulting in the production of the matrix molecules such as fibronectin, and collagen [101].

Table 1.

Specific Findings on MMP-2, MMP-8, MMP-9 and TIMPs in HS

MMPs Expression levels Identified cellular sources Observed correlations Mechanisms in HS
MMP-2 Significantly Elevated in Lesional Skin [74, 93, 94] Keratinocytes, Fibroblasts, Macrophages, Lymphocytes, Sweat Glands, Hair Follicles, Sinus Tracts [9597] Positive correlation with Hurley Stages, HSS Score (via C1M, C4M) [104, 105] Drives expansive lesion growth and sinus tract formation; May inactivate HBD2, impairing antimicrobial defense [93, 100, 101, 103]
MMP-8 Highly Upregulated in Lesions and Blood [102] Neutrophilic Granulocytes, Dermal Fibroblasts [91, 108] Positive correlation with TNF-α blood levels, Sartorius Score (inflammatory nodules/abscesses, fistulas); Negative correlation with HDL-cholesterol; Positive correlation with resistin [109] Contributes to skin cavity (abscess, sinus tract) development; Linked to systemic metabolic alterations [106, 123125]
MMP-9 High in Lesional Skin (Active Form Present) [84, 110] Myeloid Cells (Macrophages, Neutrophils), Keratinocytes, Inflammatory Cells, Fibroblasts [112114] Positive correlation with Hurley Stages, HSS Score (via C3M, C4M) [104] Involved in tissue matrix remodeling for lesion/tract development; Part of a causal chain linking HFD, gut dysbiosis, systemic inflammation, HHcy to HS pathology [111, 115, 116, 119]
TIMP-1 Nor reported Fibroblasts, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, monocytes and macrophages, Endothelial cells, Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts [119, 126128] Not reported High levels contribute to fibrosis by reducing ECM degradation and upregulating inflammatory mediators [89, 116, 129, 130]
TIMP-2, −3, −4 Not reported Fibroblasts, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, monocytes and macrophages, Endothelial cells, Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts [126, 127, 130, 131] Positive correlation of TIMP2 with treatment response (HiSCR fulfilment) [124] Not reported

MMP-2 expression is vigorously elevated in HS lesional skin [74, 93, 94]. Within HS lesions, MMP-2 is detected in keratinocytes, fibroblasts, inflammatory cells (specifically macrophages and lymphocytes), sweat glands, outer epithelial sheath of hair follicles and sinus tracts [93]. Its increased production, directly associated with HS lesional skin, contributes to the formation of hypodermal tracts through extensive matrix remodelling [102] (Fig. 3).

Beyond its role in extracellular matrix remodeling, MMP-2 may exacerbate the chronic inflammatory and infectious nature of HS. Indeed, the excessive expression of MMP-2 and almost absent expression of HBD-2, an anti-microbial peptide, has been found in HS biopsies [93, 103]. Specific ECM-based biomarkers indicative of MMP-2 activity, such as C1M (MMP-2, −9, −13 mediated degradation of type I collagen) and C4M (MMP-2, −9, −12 mediated degradation of type IV collagen), are significantly elevated in higher Hurley stages (II and III) of HS and show a moderate-strong correlation with the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score (HSS), a classification system of the disease severity, reflecting ongoing dermis degradation and disease activity [104, 105] (Table 1, Fig. 3).

MMP-8, also known as collagenase-2, is a specific collagenase released by polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) that preferentially cleaves fibrillar collagens, notably types I and III [91]. Being strongly associated with neutrophils distribution, MMP-8 is considered a key mediator in the early inflammatory phase of fibrosis. In murine models of pulmonary and hepatic fibrosis, MMP-8 actively promotes fibrotic responses [106, 107]. MMP-8 is identified as one of the most highly upregulated molecules in HS lesions and blood plasma when compared to healthy controls [102]. A clear positive association exists between MMP-8 and TNF-α blood levels in HS patients. This correlation is mechanistically supported by experimental findings demonstrating that TNF-α stimulates the release of MMP-8 from neutrophilic granulocytes and synovial fibroblasts [108]. The secreted MMP-8, in turn, can activate other pro-inflammatory cytokines, further amplifying the cycle of ECM degradation. In line with this observation, blood MMP-8 levels showed a positive correlation with HS disease severity [109]. As an enzyme specialized in ECM degradation, particularly collagen type I, MMP-8 is hypothesized to contribute directly to the development of abscesses and draining sinus tracts characteristic of HS lesions. Beyond its local effects, a significant association between MMP-8 and metabolic alterations in HS patients has been revealed. Specifically, MMP-8 blood levels negatively correlated with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (an anti-atherogenic lipid) and positively correlated with blood levels of resistin, an adipokine implicated in atherosclerosis and inflammation [109]. The association of MMP-8 with metabolic perturbations suggests a systemic component of HS pathophysiology that extends beyond localized skin inflammation. This observation positions MMP-8 as a potential biomarker not only for skin disease activity but also for systemic comorbidities, offering a broader diagnostic and prognostic utility and potentially linking HS to wider metabolic dysregulation (Table 1, Fig. 3).

Finally, MMP-9, also known as gelatinase B, primarily degrades type IV collagen [110, 111]. It is produced by different cell types including keratinocytes and immune cells, and its activity is enhanced during the early inflammatory stage of wound healing [112114]. Elevated levels of MMP-9 are frequently observed in a range of fibrotic conditions, including Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) and Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) [115117]. Decreased MMP-9 activity has been reported in the context of hypertrophic scarring, while high levels have been observed in scarless wound healing models [118], leading to the hypothesis that elevated MMP-9 levels might actually contribute to reduced scar formation. MMP-9 expression and secretion are modulated by mechanical cues derived from the ECM. For instance, fibrotic rigidities have been shown to downregulate MMP-9 expression and secretion in hepatic stellate cells involved in liver fibrosis [119]. This observation introduces a feedback loop where the fibrotic environment itself, through increased stiffness, actively suppresses the activity of the enzyme MMP-9, and simultaneously increases the expression of its inhibitor expression TIMP-1, a pro-fibrotic player [120]. This suggests a mechanism by which fibrosis can become self-perpetuating and resistant to resolution, which is vital for understanding the progressive nature of fibrotic diseases. High levels of MMP-9 are present in HS perilesional and lesional skin [84]. Active forms of MMP-9 are detected specifically around sites of active tissue remodeling, including dermal fissures, and are primarily expressed by macrophages and neutrophils [102, 110]. ECM-based biomarkers reflecting MMP-9 activity, such as C3M (MMP-9 mediated degradation of type III collagen) and C4M (MP-2, −9, −12 mediated degradation of type IV collagen), are significantly elevated in Hurley stages II and III of HS and show a moderate-strong correlation with the IHS score, indicating their utility in assessing disease activity and severity [104] (Table 1, Fig. 3).

It has been suggested that MMP-9 upregulation in HS can be a consequence of systemic dysbiosis-led inflammation and hyperhomocysteinemia. Specifically, a high-fat diet in HS patients can initiate gut dysbiosis, often characterized by decreased producers of Short-Chain Fatty Acids, such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bifidobacterium, and increased pro-inflammatory bacteria, leading to systemic inflammation [120122]. This last, coupled with hyperhomocysteinemia, promotes the infiltration of leukocytes into the skin, which release additional inflammatory cytokines that stimulate MMP-9 expression and activity, leading to the formation of painful nodules, and hypodermal tracts [102] (Fig. 3).

Differential functions of TIMP-1, TIMP-2, TIMP-3, and TIMP-4 in tissue homeostasis and maladaptive remodeling

The function of MMPs is tightly controlled by TIMPs, which form 1:1 complex with MMPs, thereby inhibiting their proteolytic activity of the ECM components [132]. A disruption in this delicate balance between MMPs and TIMPs is a central mechanism contributing to the disturbed collagen deposition and degradation observed in fibrotic conditions [126, 127]. Indeed, the dysregulated production and combined activity of different MMPs and TIMPs, in association to chronical inflammation, can hinder normal ECM turnover and architecture restoration, leading to fibrotic epilogue [84, 123125].

Elevated levels of TIMP-1 are frequently observed in fibrotic skin conditions, such as Systemic Sclerosis (SSc), age-related renal fibrosis, and cardiac fibrosis and are considered to actively contribute to the development of tissue fibrosis [123, 124] (Table 1). TIMP-2 inhibits most of MMPs, but it also has a dual action on MMP-2. It facilitates the cell-surface activation of pro-MMP-2 by forming a tri-molecular complex with membrane type 1-MMP (MT1-MMP), which is critical in maladaptive cardiovascular ECM remodelling [130]. Furthermore, TIMP-2 can induce a pro-fibrotic response (myofibroblast activation and increased collagen synthesis) in a manner potentially independent of its MMP-inhibitory activity [130] (Table 1). In contrast, TIMP-3 can have anti-fibrotic functions, by inhibiting the enzyme ADAM17 (also known as TNF-α Converting Enzyme, or TACE) [133] (Table 1). This action blocks the cleavage and release of membrane-bound TNF-α, thereby restricting pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic signalling [133, 134]. In addition, TIMP-3 can inhibit the pro-fibrotic factors ADAMTS4 and ADAMTS5 (ADAM with Thrombospondin motifs) that, through the cleavage of TGF-β binding proteins, lead to the release of active TGF-β, a potent mediator of fibrosis. By inhibiting ADAMATS members, TIMP-3 can indirectly reduce the amount of active TGF-β, thus mitigating the fibrotic response [101, 135137] (Table 1). Studies in animal models of kidney injury [138] and pulmonary fibrosis [139] strongly support the anti-fibrotic role for TIMP-3. Finally, like all TIMPs, TIMP-4 inhibits various MMPs, with a notably strong affinity for MMP-26 and the ability to regulate the activation of pro-MMP-2. By inhibiting these enzymes, TIMP-4 helps to regulate the ECM turnover and tissue remodelling in the heart and the brain [134136] (Table 1). To date, TIMPs role in HS pathogenesis is totally missing. Further in vitro and in vivo studies would be addressed to deepen their expression and functions in the different stages of HS and their specific involvement in inflammation and fibrotic processes.

Adipose tissue dysfunction in HS

The connection between obesity—the primary comorbidity of HS—and disease pathogenesis extends far beyond simple correlation. Obesity represents a state of chronic, low-grade systemic inflammation, driven by hypertrophic adipose tissue [7, 124]. No longer viewed as merely a passive energy storage site, adipose tissue functions as a highly active, complex endocrine and immunologic organ. While primarily composed of adipocytes, it also contains blood vessels, fibroblasts, and immune cells such as macrophages and T-cells. Beyond standard cytokines, adipose tissue secretes specialized signaling proteins called adipokines, which regulate systemic inflammation, metabolism, and immune responses [124]. In healthy individuals, adipose tissue maintains a homeostatic balance of these proteins. However, in patients with HS- particularly those with elevated body mass indices- this tissue becomes dysfunctional, triggering a severe imbalance between pro- and anti-inflammatory adipokines [84, 125]. Given that adipokines modulate both innate and adaptive immune responses, as well as extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling and tissue fibrosis, it is evident that adipose tissue plays a pivotal role in driving HS pathogenesis.

Adipokine signaling in HS: bridging the gap between systemic metabolic dysfunction and cutaneous inflammation

The dysregulated levels of adipokines are not merely markers of obesity but are direct molecular messengers that bridge the gap between systemic metabolic dysfunction and local cutaneous pathology [84, 125]. Indeed, adipokines regulate not only systemic metabolism but also inflammation, immune function, angiogenesis and wound healing [125]. This extensive network of communication allows adipose tissue to integrate systemic metabolism with immune function through both pro- and anti-inflammatory properties. Leptin, resistin, and visfatin are among the key pro-inflammatory adipokines found to be upregulated in obesity and MetS. Leptin regulates appetite and energy expenditure in physiological conditions. However, high levels can cause leptin resistance in the brain, leading to increased appetite and obesity. It also acts as a pro-inflammatory cytokine, influencing both innate and adaptive immune systems and contributing to systemic Th1/Th17 inflammation [125, 140]. Specifically, leptin promotes macrophage polarization towards a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, characterized by the production of cytokines such as IL-6, IL-1β, and TNF-α, by activating several signaling pathways, including the mTORC2/AKT, MAPK, and PI3K [141, 142]. In addition, leptin has been demonstrated to enhance immature dendritic cell migration and chemotaxis, promoting a Th1-polarized immune response [143, 144]. Finally, it promotes proliferation and activation of Th1 and Th17 cells, by upregulating glucose metabolism, and suppresses the proliferation of the anti-inflammatory Treg lymphocytes [143, 144].

Resistin directly contributes to insulin resistance in the liver and muscles, hindering glucose uptake [145]. It plays also an important role in the development and progression of chronic type-2 diabetes, hypertension, atherosclerosis, acute myocardial infarction, and heart failure, although the precise mechanisms involved have not yet been fully elucidated [146, 147]. However, resistin is known to promote IL-23/Th17 inflammation in various experimental models and to regulate the homeostasis of Treg cells [125, 148].

The role of visfatin (also known as Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyltransferase or NAMPT) in obesity and MetS is complex. Visfatin has a crucial role in cellular metabolism by contributing to NAD (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) biosynthesis and enabling energy metabolism. Following secretion, visfatin also exerts pro-inflammatory activity. Indeed, it induces the synthesis of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in human leukocytes, as well as in epidermal keratinocytes and fibroblasts, by activation of NF-κB, p38 and MEK1 signaling pathways [149, 150].

In contrast, the role of adiponectin is fundamentally protective. It acts as a key anti-inflammatory and insulin-sensitizing hormone. In individuals with obesity and MetS, the core pathology is a deficiency of adiponectin, which removes its beneficial effects and directly contributes to the development and progression of insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular disease [151, 152]. Adiponectin signalling suppresses the expansion of antigen-specific T cells and their expression of cytokines, while enhancing T cell apoptosis [153]. In vitro, adiponectin inhibits Th1 cell and Th17 cell differentiation, but not Th2 cell differentiation, through inhibition of RORγt (retinoid-related orphan receptor-γt) [154156].

In metabolically healthy individuals, a homeostatic balance between these opposing adipokine groups is maintained [157]. However, in patients with HS, this balance is profoundly shifted towards pro-inflammatory adipokines, due, at least in part, to their comorbid condition of obesity [7, 158] (Fig. 4). Indeed, serum concentrations of leptin are notably higher in HS patients than in control individuals and contribute to the state of chronic low-grade inflammation [159]. Resistin and visfatin levels are also significantly elevated and are independently associated with an increased risk for HS [159]. Conversely, adiponectin, a crucial anti-inflammatory adipokine, is found at significantly lower serum concentrations in these patients [160] (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Crosstalk between adipose tissue, immune response and comorbidities in HS. This schematic representation depicts the interaction between adipokines and immune cells in HS compared with healthy tissue. In HS, dysregulated adipokine production—characterized by elevated leptin, resistin, and visfatin and reduced adiponectin—drives a pro-inflammatory cytokine profile (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, IL-17). These changes promote immune cell activation (Th1, Th17, macrophages, dendritic cells) and extracellular matrix remodeling, contributing to skin inflammation and fibrosis, as well as to systemic comorbidities. In healthy individuals, balanced adipokine signaling maintains metabolic and immune homeostasis

The upregulation of specific molecules, like leptin, resistin and visfatin, and the downregulation of the adiponectin provide a tangible and mechanistic link that explains how obesity-induced adipose tissue hypertrophy directly drives the inflammatory and metabolic dysregulation observed in HS (Fig. 4). This understanding suggests that therapeutic strategies targeting the adipokine pathways themselves, rather than just focusing on weight loss, may be effective for a broad range of HS patients, regardless of their body mass index (BMI).

Adipokine-mediated ECM remodelling and fibrosis in HS

Emerging evidence reveal a tightly interplay between adipokines and ECM remodelling/fibrosis axis. Leptin drives fibrosis starting different intracellular pathways downstream of the long receptor isoform Ob-Rb, including Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK)/STAT pathways [161], as well as ERK and AKT-dependent pathways, which activate HSCs proliferation [162]. The activation of JAK2/STAT3 [163] induces the expression of the pro-fibrotic mediators TGF-β1, collagen type I, IL-1β, IL-6, and CCL2 particularly in Kupffer cells and sinusoidal endothelial cells [164, 165] (Fig. 5). In non-alcoholic steato-hepatitis, increased expression of Ob-Rb correlates with the severity of hepatic fibrosis and elevated TGF-β1 level [166], suggesting a crucial role of this pathway. Similarly, in obesity-associated heart failure, adipokine dysregulation promotes cardiovascular fibrosis by driving fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition and ECM accumulation. In particular, leptin, secreted by epicardial fat and myocardial tissue, contributes to collagen accumulation [167, 168].

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Molecular interplay between leptin, resistin, visfatin, and adiponectin in inflammatory and fibrogenic pathways. Under inflammatory conditions, adipocytes release adipokines such as leptin (Lep), resistin (Res), and visfatin (Vis), which promote fibrogenic signaling. These adipokines downregulate the expression of the antifibrotic gene MMP1 and upregulate profibrotic genes like TGF-β, COL1 and 2 (collagen type I and II), MMP2, aSMA, resulting in excessive ECM production and increased ECM stiffness that exacerbate tissue fibrosis. Mechanistically, leptin exerts its pro-fibrotic effects through activation of the JAK2/STAT3, MAPK/ERK, p38, Rho/ROCK, and PI3K/AKT pathways, whereas resistin predominantly signals via JAK2/STAT3. Conversely, adiponectin (Adipo) exerts anti-fibrotic activity by inhibiting leptin-induced profibrotic pathways (JAK2/STAT3, MAPK/ERK, and p38) and activating AMPK signaling. Through AMPK activation, adiponectin enhances MMP1 expression while repressing COL1 gene expression, thereby counteracting fibrogenesis and maintaining tissue homeostasis

In adult rat cardiac myofibroblasts, leptin stimulates expression of collagen I, TGF-β, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), and galectin-3 through the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway [169, 170] (Fig. 5). Leptin also enhances ECM accumulation by regulating MMPs/TIMPs system, through the activation of MAPKs such as ERK and p38 pathways that lead to the suppression of collagen-degrading enzymes MMP-1 expression while upregulation of its inhibitor TIMP-1 [171, 172]. In LX-2 hepatic stellate cells, leptin robustly increases TIMP-1 mRNA, protein, and promoter activity through activation of JAK1/2, STAT3/5, ERK1/2, and p38 signaling in an H₂O₂-dependent manner. Pharmacological inhibition of these pathways with specific inhibitors AG490 (JAK inhibitor), PD098059 (ERK inhibitor), SB203580 (p38 inhibitor), or catalase (H₂O₂ scavenger), abrogates this response [171] (Fig. 5). Beyond MMP inhibition, leptin-induced TIMP-1 promotes myocardial fibrosis via CD63/β1-integrin signaling in cardiac fibroblasts [173]. Finally, leptin modulates myocardial matrix remodeling by promoting MMP-2 activation and cardiac fibroblast migration through Rho/ROCK-dependent regulation of MT1-MMP localization [174].

Adiponectin, instead, exerts context-dependent regulatory effects on cardiac and liver fibrosis. It can induce cell migration, MMP activation, and collagen remodeling through the APPL1-AMPK molecular axis [175], while in other settings adiponectin inhibits fibrosis via the AdipoR1-AMPK-iNOS pathway [176]. In an angiotensin-induced cardiac remodeling model, it exerts anti-fibrotic effects through PPAR-α activation [177]. Additionally, adiponectin counteracts leptin effects and restores the proteolytic balance of MMPs/TIMPs system (Fig. 5). In hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) adiponectin inhibits leptin-stimulated JAK2/STAT3 signaling and reduces TIMP-1 expression, through activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and induction of suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (SOCS-3) [178]. Adiponectin also increases the expression of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B (PTP1B), which enhances SOCS-3 binding to the leptin receptor Ob-Rb, thereby blocking leptin-mediated formation of extracellular TIMP-1/MMP-1 complex [179], thus resulting in anti-fibrotic effects (Fig. 5).

Conversely, Ramezani-Moghadam and colleagues have demonstrated that adiponectin increases TIMP-1 expression to initiate the MMP-independent signaling cascade through the CD63/β1-integrin complex, leading to the reduction of focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation, thereby limiting HSCs cell migration [180]. They also found a positive association between adiponectin and TIMP-1 serum levels in patients with liver fibrosis [180]. Of interest, in patients with keloids, serum adiponectin are significantly reduced and are inversely correlate with severity index score of disease, while TGF-β1, CTGF, IL-6, and TNF-α levels are elevated compared to controls [181]. Adiponectin also reduces TGF-β1-induced collagen I expression and increases MMP-1 expression in keloid, but not in normal fibroblasts, attenuating fibrotic processes. This inhibition is reversed by the AMPK inhibitor Compound C but unaffected by the PI3K/AKT inhibitor LY294002 [181] (Fig. 5). Adiponectin activates dermal fibroblasts, by inhibiting TGF-β1-induced proliferation and p38-mediated myofibroblast differentiation [182]. Similar effects are observed in keloid fibroblasts, where the adiponectin mimetic ADP355 suppresses ERK and p38 activation, reducing ECM accumulation [183]. In primary human hepatocytes, adiponectin can also increase MMP-9 mRNA and enzymatic activity [184], which plays a bidirectional regulatory role in different fibrotic diseases or different stages of the same fibrotic disease [115]. Due to the lack of mouse models of HS, the bidirectional link between adiponectin and MMP-9 remains to be investigated.

Resistin has emerged as a potent pro-fibrotic mediator, promoting fibroblast-to-myofibroblast trans-differentiation, enhancing the expression levels of type I collagen, α-SMA, MMP-9 molecules via JAK2/STAT3 and JNK/c-Jun signaling pathways [185] (Fig. 5). The receptor mediating resistin effects in fibroblast-to-myofibroblast conversion has not yet been identified. Several receptors have been reported to mediate resistin signaling, including adenylyl cyclase-associated protein 1 (CAP1), decorin, receptor tyrosine-like orphan receptor 1 (ROR1), and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), which activate distinct signaling pathways in a tissue-dependent manner. ROR1 and decorin are mainly expressed in pre-adipocytes and adipocytes, respectively, CAP1 in monocytes, while TLR4 is broadly expressed, including in dermal fibroblasts [186, 187].

Finally, visfatin exacerbates hepatic fibrosis in a steato-hepatitis mouse model, where it enhances the expression of fibrosis markers such as αSMA, CTGF, TIMP-1, collagen 1α2, collagen 3α2, fibronectin, and vimentin in liver [188]. Its neutralization by a specific antibody (ALT-100) attenuates disease severity in a murine model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, attenuating the progression to hepatic fibrosis [189]. Visfatin is also involved in adipose tissue fibrosis promoting ECM protein production including Collagen type VI, MMP-2 and MMP-9 [190] (Fig. 5). The receptor responsible for mediating these effects has not yet been conclusively identified. Visfatin has been reported to interact with the G-protein-coupled receptor C–C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) [191] and with TLR4 in inflammatory contexts [192]. However, evidence showing that visfatin can exert its effects independently of TLR4 [193] suggests that yet unidentified receptors could be involved in these mechanisms.

Together, these findings outline a causal chain in which obesity-driven systemic adipokine dysregulation activates pro-fibrotic pathways in the skin, although the molecular mechanisms linking adipokines to MMP/TIMP system and extracellular matrix remodeling in HS remain incompletely defined.

Potential implications of HS treatments on inflammation and tissue architecture

Pharmacological modulation of HS: from conventional antibiotics to precision biologic interventions

The management of moderate-to-severe HS increasingly relies on conventional and targeted therapies, which interrupt broad or specific inflammatory pathways to reduce disease activity, respectively.

Conventional therapies include oral antibiotics, specifically tetracyclines (in particular doxycycline), considered first-line systemic agents for mild to severe HS forms [8], anti-androgenic therapies (specifically spironolactone), particularly relevant in female patients [194], and intralesional corticosteroid injections (i.e. triamcinolone acetonide) prompting reductions in pain and inflammation [195, 196]. Doxycycline is effective primarily for mild-to-moderate cases, with a 54% reduction in Sartorius score [197]. Patients with more advanced disease, characterized by sinus tracts and scarring, often require a combination of antibiotics, such as clindamycin and rifampicin [198, 199] (Fig. 6). Approximately 48.2% of patients achieve a 50% or greater reduction in inflammatory lesion counts after a 12-week course with the combination of Clindamycin and Rifampicin [200].

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Categories of conventional therapies for HS management. The Fig. provides an overview of conventional therapeutic strategies for patients with HS. First-line and advanced conventional treatments depicted include oral antibiotics (tetracyclines such as doxycycline, or combination of clindamycin and rifampicin), intralesional corticosteroid injections (triamcinolone acetonide), and anti-androgenic therapy (spironolactone). Additionally, metformin has emerged as an adjunctive option in obese and insulin-resistant patients affected by HS

In addition, acitretin, a derivative of vitamin A, may be considered in patients with refractory disease who are not of childbearing potential. Overall, around 47% reach a HSS ≥ 50% reduction from baseline [201]. Of note, obesity may reduce treatments efficacy due to altered drug pharmacokinetics and increased systemic low-grade inflammation. Indeed, BMI is associated with a poor response to standard antibiotic courses, requiring careful dosage management to avoid therapeutic failure [202].

Mechanistically, antibiotics are known to inhibit MMPs, as well as to reduce neutrophil chemotaxis and downregulate pro-inflammatory cytokines such as CXCL-8, TNF-α, and IL-1β [201205]. Corticosteroids, other than inhibiting inflammation, decrease the production of Type I and Type III collagen and glycosaminoglycans, which are the building blocks of HS scars, and interfere with TGF-β signaling, which is the primary driver of the transition from chronic inflammation to permanent scarring [206].

Of note, since obesity is often linked to insulin resistance, metformin has emerged as an adjunctive option, especially in HS patients, although designed and controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the long-term efficacy of metformin in HS patients [207]. Its potential benefit may derive from metabolic modulation, anti-androgenic effects, and weight reduction [208210]. To this regard, the emerging use of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in HS is a compelling area of research, particularly because it targets the metabolic-inflammatory axis that drives the disease [37, 211, 212]. GLP-1 RAs offer a dual mechanism of action through profound metabolic improvement and direct anti-inflammatory effects. Specifically, GLP-1 RAs mimic the GLP-1 hormone [213] whose agonists inhibit IL-23, IL-17, and IL-22, key drivers of psoriasis and HS development [214], as well as upregulate keratinocyte migration by activating P13K/AKT pathway, which is pertinent to wound healing [215] (Fig. 7). GLP-1 RAs also sustain weight loss, leading to less friction and maceration in intertriginous areas, where HS flares are common [29, 216219]. In obese patients submaximal-dose GLP-1 RA therapy is associated with significant improvements in metabolic parameters and adipokine regulation, but do not affect systemic inflammatory markers within 12 weeks [220].

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Categories of biologic therapies for HS management. Current and emerging therapeutic approaches targeting inflammatory and fibrotic pathways in HS can be grouped into four categories based on their mechanisms of action. Biologic agents targeting TNF-α signaling (Adalimumab and Infliximab) determines the reduction of pro-inflammatory modulators MMP-1, MMP-9, IL6 and the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory modulators MMP-13 and TIMP-2 resulting in the reduction of fibrotic processes. Antibodies targeting IL-17A/F and IL-23 cytokines (Secukinumab, Bimekizumab, and Guselkumab, respectively) reduce keratinocyte hyperproliferation and neutrophil recruitment. GLP-1 receptor agonists represent a novel class addressing the metabolic-inflammatory axis, combining systemic metabolic improvement with direct anti-inflammatory effects

As an alternative to these treatments, targeted therapies aim to halt the destructive inflammatory cycle involved in molecular pathogenesis and permanent tissue damages characteristic of HS by blocking key immune pathways. Biologic therapies such as Adalimumab (the first FDA-approved biologic for HS) [221223], and Infliximab bind to and block the activity of TNF-α, a major pro-inflammatory cytokine highly upregulated in HS lesions [224] (Fig. 7). By significantly controlling acute and chronic inflammation, Adalimumab and Infliximab prevents the development of new, irreversible fibrotic processes (new sinus tracts, bridge scars) [225]. Long-term follow-up studies confirmed sustained efficacy, which correlates with long-term prevention of disease progression and severe scarring (Hurley Stage III disease). Specifically, in a meta-analysis study carried by Shih et al. a pooled response rate of 83% HS patients was reported for Infliximab treatment. In PIONEERI and PIONEERII clinical trials for Adalimumab, 41.8% and 58.9% of HS patients reached, respectively, a HiSCR (Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response), defined as a 50% reduction in the total abscess and inflammatory nodule (AN) count [226]. In this real‐world setting, Adalimumab treatment of moderate‐to‐severe HS resulted in decreased disease severity in 70.2% of HS patients [227]. Finally, in open-label extension studies, the HiSCR was maintained in approximately 52.3% of patients through 168 weeks of continuous weekly treatment [228].

However, a real-world study identified significantly lower efficacy of Adalimumab in HS patients with BMI ≥ 30 compared to those with BMI < 30 [229], suggesting that therapeutic efficacy is inversely correlated to obesity. A recent study of RNA seq carried out on HS patients demonstrated that Adalimumab reduces the levels of inflammatory MMP-1 and MMP-9 while promoting wound-healing MMP-13 and TIMP-2 levels in the circulation of the patients with who responded to treatment [230]. However, in a recent study carried out on patients with HS and control subjects after at least 12 weeks of treatment with Adalimumab, only plasma IL-6 and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) are reduced by biologic therapy, while IFN-γ, TNF-α, adiponectin and leptin levels do not change [231] (Fig. 7).

Newer biologic agents targeting other crucial cytokines, such as IL-17, have been recently approved for HS treatment. Secukinumab and Bimekizumab work to reduce lesion counts and inflammation by blocking IL-17A and/or IL-17F, which drive keratinocytes hyperproliferation, the neutrophils recruitment, and chronic inflammation [232234] (Fig. 7). Real-world data on the long-term effectiveness of the anti-IL17 agent Secukinumab in treating moderate-to-severe HS showed a 56.5% maximal response rate (evaluated in terms of HiSCR and IHS4 reduction of at least 50%) at 6 months and dropout exceeding 40% at 1 year of treatment [235]. Similarly, a real-world study showed that 66.67% of HS patients responded to Bimekizumab at 16 weeks as calculated by HiSCR50 [236]. Response rates in this group at week 16 are higher than those seen in phase III clinical trials, where at week 12, 46% of Bimekizumab-treated participants achieved HiSCR75 and 32% achieved HiSCR90 [237].

However, molecular data on the effects of these biologics on inflammation, ECM remodelling or fibrosis pathways are missing. It is plausible that anti-IL-17 biologic affect these processes, as it has been reported that IL-17A and IL-17E contribute to IPF, primary biliary cirrhosis, and salivary gland fibrosis through the activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), which leads to fibroblast proliferation and differentiation in myofibroblasts [238]. Furthermore, case reports or case series also show good results for other biologics. For instance, Guselkumab, an anti-IL-23 biologic, may offer clinical benefit in select HS populations, particularly those with comorbid psoriasis or Crohn's disease [239], although its impact on tissue destruction and fibrosis has not been yet investigated (Fig. 7). However, IL-23, through several signaling pathways, provokes the activation of EMT mechanism, inducing fibrotic processes in autoimmune diseases, and chronic inflammation that determines severe fibrotic evolution in several diseases [239].

Finally, despite substantial advances in medical therapy, surgery remains the definitive treatment for irreversible structural sequelae of HS, including epithelialized sinus tracts and hypertrophic scarring. For localized disease, particularly Hurley stage I and II, the minimal-invasive tissue-saving surgical technique, known as deroofing, is used [240]. Patients with extensive, coalescing disease, typical of Hurley stage III, often require wide radical excision, which entails removal of all apocrine-bearing tissue [241]. However, as for the other standard therapies, higher BMI can sometimes complicate post-surgical wound healing in skin folds due to increased tension on the stitches and moisture in the area.

Clinical trials for HS treatment: next-generation antibodies and intracellular signaling inhibitors

Beyond currently approved biologics used as standard therapies in HS as well as conventional and surgical treatments, a growing number of clinical trials are evaluating novel therapeutic strategies, based on the refined immune-pathogenesis understanding and the urgent need to better manage patients with refractory disease and extensive structural damages.

Although the IL-17 axis still remains of therapeutic interest, increasing evidence points to JAK signaling and emerging adaptive B-cell involvement in chronic tunnels as molecular targets [3, 242]. Following the regulatory approval of anti-IL17 biologics Secukinumab and Bimekizumab, therapeutic development in HS has increasingly focused on improving their therapeutic efficacy and drug penetration, particularly within fibrotic, tunnel-rich lesions.

Conventional monoclonal antibodies may have limited penetration into the complex HS tunnel microenvironment [233, 243]. Izokibep, a small IL-17A–targeting protein, may improve tunnel penetration and is currently in phase 3 trials following favorable phase 2b results in anti–TNF-α–refractory moderate-to-severe HS [NCT05905783 [242];]. Similarly, Sonelokimab, a trivalent IL-17A/F nanobody with extended half-life by albumin binding, is under phase 3 evaluation with promising efficacy and safety [NCT06411899; NCT06411379]. In parallel, the bispecific IL-17A/F inhibitor Brivekimig is being assessed in phase 2b trials stratified by draining tunnel burden to address phenotypic and fibrotic heterogeneity [NCT07170917] (Table 2).

Table 2.

Ongoing clinical trials in HS

Drug Target/mechanism Drug class Clinical phase Key population/rationale Clinical trial reference
Izokibep IL-17A Small protein IL-17A inhibitor Phase 2b/Phase 3 Moderate-to-severe HS; prior anti-TNF-α failure; improved penetration into fibrotic tunnels NCT05355805 (Phase 2b); NCT05905783 (Phase 3)
Sonelokimab IL-17A/IL-17F + albumin binding Trivalent nanobody Phase 3 Moderate-to-severe HS; dual IL-17 blockade with prolonged systemic half-life NCT06411899; NCT06411379
Brivekimig IL-17A/IL-17F Bispecific monoclonal antibody Phase 2b Moderate-to-severe HS; Enrollment stratified by draining tunnel burden to address phenotypic heterogeneity NCT07170917
Povorcitinib JAK1 Selective JAK1 inhibitor (oral) Phase 2/Phase 3 Moderate-to-severe HS; Clinically meaningful efficacy on inflammatory lesions, pain, and fibrotic remodeling

NCT03569371

(Phase 2); NCT05620823

(Phase 3)

Upatacitinib JAK1 Selective JAK1 inhibitor (oral) Phase 3 Moderate-to-severe HS; Assessment of disease activity and safety NCT05889182
Ruxolitinib cream (1.5%) JAK1/JAK2 Topical JAK inhibitor Phase 3 Hurley stage I–II HS; topical modulation of JAK/STAT signaling NCT06959225
Remibrutinib Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) Selective BTK inhibitor (oral) Phase 2/Phase 3 Moderate-to-severe HS; Targeting B-cell–driven inflammation NCT06840392
Fostamatinib Spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) SYK inhibitor (oral) Open-label/Phase 2 Moderate-to-severe HS; Targeting B-cell populations and downregulation of inflammatory and fibrotic gene signatures in HS fibroblasts NCT05040698

Beyond blocking cytokines, targeting intracellular molecular pathways implicated in HS pathogenesis have become a promising strategy for HS treatment. In particular, the JAK/STAT molecular pathway has emerged as a key target in the evolving therapeutic landscape for HS. Povorcitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy in phase 2 studies, prompting advancement into ongoing phase 3 trials evaluating long-term effects on lesion resolution, pain and fibrotic remodeling [244], [NCT03569371, NCT05620823]. Upadacitinib (JAK1 inhibitor) under phase 3 evaluation [NCT05889182] has shown promising results, specifically targeting patients with prior TNF-α inhibitor failure. Topical modulation of JAK signaling is being explored through a 1.5% Ruxolitinib cream formulation, now in phase 3 for patients with Hurley stage I and II disease [NCT06959225]. JAK inhibitors markedly reduce inflammatory lesions and abscesses by broadly suppressing pro-inflammatory cytokine signaling, including key fibrogenic pathways such as IL-6 and IL-17, thereby limiting inflammation-driven fibrosis. Furthermore, as previously described, the JAK/STAT pathway directly contributes to fibrotic mechanisms by upregulating the expression of profibrotic mediators [164, 165], also through the activation by the pro-inflammatory adipokine leptin [161].

These findings suggest that targeting the JAK/STAT axis could provide a dual benefit in HS by attenuating both inflammation and fibrosis, while also addressing the contribution of adipose tissue-derived mediators to these pathogenic mechanisms (Table 2).

In addition, recent advances have focused attention on B cells within chronic HS tunnels, redirecting therapeutic interest toward humoral immune pathways [245]. In this context, the inhibition of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK), cytoplasmic kinase involved in the development, signaling and survival of B-lymphocytes [246] represents a novel mechanistic approach. The selective oral BTK inhibitor Remibrutinib in phase 2, promoting progression to phase 3 to assess long term efficacy, supports the clinical relevance of the B-cell axis in HS [NCT06840392]. Similarly, inhibition of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK), with Fostamatinib, an important mediator of downstream signaling in B cells but also involved in modulation of fibroblasts inflammation and fibrotic programs [247], has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in open-label studies [NCT05040698; [248, 249]] (Table 2). Notably, SYK treatment down-regulates the expression of genes related to inflammation, proliferation, fibrosis and migration in fibroblast subpopulations implicated in scarring. Importantly, the inhibition of BTK and SYK pathways, implicated in the amplification NF-κB and MAPK-mediated inflammatory cascades and intersecting with the JAK/STAT network [246, 250], could support a translational link between B-cell-driven inflammation and attenuation of fibrosis in HS lesions.

In conclusion, the HS clinical trial landscape has expanded to diverse therapeutic strategies targeting multiple disease aspects, including fibrosis, scarring, and chronic tunnels. However, variable and limited responses highlight the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of HS, suggesting distinct inflammatory and fibrotic endotypes and limiting the effectiveness of a one-size-fits-all approach. In addition, obesity has emerged as a key disease modifier affecting patient stratification, trial endpoints, and outcome interpretation. Future therapies must integrate patient-specific factors and fibrotic disease features into trial design and treatment selection to achieve meaningful outcomes.

Discussion and future directions

The prevailing evidence confirms that HS transcends the traditional definition of follicular occlusion. It is a progressive, multi-systemic inflammatory disorder characterized by an aberrant ECM remodeling–fibrosis axis. Central to its pathogenesis is a dysregulated adipokine profile, which acts as a molecular bridge between obesity-related systemic inflammation and localized cutaneous destruction. In this landscape, the imbalance between MMPs and TIMPs -fuelled in part by visceral and subcutaneous adiposity- serves as both a consequence of and a fuel for the chronic inflammatory state.

Despite these insights, clinical management remains suboptimal, even in advanced healthcare systems. The profound impact on patient quality of life is exacerbated by a diagnostic latency of 7–10 years and a "therapeutic lag," where biologics are often introduced only after years of less effective systemic treatments [251]. Moreover, the 40–50% non-response rate to current biologics underscores the influence of the complex genetic profiles on the clinical outcomes. Bridging this gap requires the identification of robust genetic and proteomic biomarkers to facilitate not only the early differential diagnosis but also to predict individual therapeutic response. To this regard, a recent pharmacogenomic GWAS study carried out on 455 HS patients, investigating genetic variants associated with response to Adalimumab, has identified a SNP in the gene of the anti-apoptotic factor BCL2, thus suggesting a potential role of apoptosis regulation in the pathophysiology of Adalimumab response. Of note, this study provided the first evidence of a genetic link to Adalimumab response [252].

Addressing the "great unknowns" of HS require a deeper investigation into the functional duality of MMPs and TIMPs. It remains unclear which specific isoforms drive pathology versus those that facilitate repair; their roles likely shift dynamically across disease stages. While broad-spectrum inhibitors (e.g., Batimastat) failed due to dose-limiting musculoskeletal toxicities, highly selective agents like Andecaliximab (targeting MMP-9) offer a more precise alternative. Andecaliximab is a highly selective monoclonal antibody designed to inhibit MMP-9. It represents the most advanced attempt to target this specific protein. While it was studied in Phase II and III trials for Ulcerative Colitis and Gastric Cancer, it failed to meet its primary endpoints in those areas [253, 254]. In 2023, research highlighted that "active" MMP-9 (specifically a form called F107-MMP9) is highly localized in the dermal fissures and fistulae of HS patients. This has sparked renewed interest in using specific antibodies like Andecaliximab for HS, but a formal HS-specific trial has not yet been launched.

Future research should also integrate the influence of the "gut-skin axis" and metabolic factors on HS pathogenesis and the optimal response to drugs. Investigating how diet and the microbiome modulate MMP activity could pave the way for lifestyle-based adjunctive therapies, with emerging evidence suggesting that Mediterranean diet adherence and weight management may significantly improve clinical outcomes.

Ultimately, the transition toward precision medicine in HS necessitates a departure from "single-target" paradigms. We should embrace a network biology framework that accounts for the interplay between inflammatory mediators, adipokines, and specialized fibroblast subtypes. A "multi-hit" therapeutic strategy -simultaneously neutralizing inflammatory "alarmins" (i.e. TNF-α, IL-1β) while stabilizing the ECM remodelling/fibrosis balance and addressing metabolic dysfunction- may be required to achieve durable, long-term remission. Advancing this frontier will depend on large-scale clinical trials that integrate high-resolution "omics" (genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic) to define distinct disease endotypes and deliver truly personalized care.

To conclude, the management of HS should also address the profound psychological burden that characterizes the disease. The chronic pain, malodour, and visibility of HS lesions often lead to social isolation, anxiety, and depression, creating a bidirectional cycle were psychological distress fuels systemic inflammation and vice versa. Addressing the profound psychological burden is crucial to interrupting the bidirectional cycle between mental health issues and systemic inflammation [4]. Indeed, mental resilience and patient self-efficacy are essential prerequisites for sustaining radical lifestyle changes, such as smoking cessation and dietary adherence, which are necessary to reduce the adipokine-mediated inflammatory burden. Therefore, by acknowledging the unique psychological profile and social circumstances of each patient, clinicians can move beyond standard protocols to develop targeted interventions that improve not only the skin's appearance but the patient's entire quality of life.

Acknowledgements

BioRender.com was used to create all figures.

Authors' contributions

This review has been conceived by Laura Mercurio and Stefania Madonna, who drafted the manuscript and revised the final version. The literature review involved contribution of Roberta Belli, while manuscript writing and Figure preparation involved contributions from Maria Grazia Lolli and Luca Sanna, who critically revised also the final version. Anna Dattolo and Luca Fania contributed to the manuscript writing and preparation of the clinical Figures. Laura Colonna, Cristina Albanesi e Prof. Paolo Marchetti revised the final version of manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version.

Funding

This research received funding from the European Union—Next Generation EU—PNRR-MAD-2022–12375740 M6C2—Investimento 2.1 Valorizzazione e potenziamento della ricerca biomedica del SSN and from Ricerca Corrente RC2026 funded by Italian Ministry of Health.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study, following approval by Comitato Etico Territoriale CET Lazio Area 5 (Prot. CE 727/CE/2024).

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for the publication of their clinical images (Fig. 1).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Maria Grazia Lolli and Luca Sanna are co-first authors.

Contributor Information

Laura Mercurio, Email: l.mercurio@idi.it.

Stefania Madonna, Email: stefania.madonna@idi.it.

References

  • 1.Mozos A, Puig L, Vilarrasa E. Fibrosis quantification in hidradenitis suppurativa tunnels: histological correlation with shear wave elastography. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025(39). 10.1111/jdv.20514. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 2.Vecin N, Balukoff NC, Yaghi M, Gonzalez T, Sawaya AP, Strbo N, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa tunnels: unveiling a unique disease entity. JID Innov. 2025;5:100350. 10.1016/j.xjidi.2025.100350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Van Straalen KR, Piguet V, Gudjonsson JE. Hidradenitis suppurativa: key insights into treatment success and failure. J Clin Invest. 2024;134:e186744. 10.1172/JCI186744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Dattolo A, Torres M, Frias-Toral E, Paganelli A, Zhang M, Madonna S, et al. Beyond the skin: endocrine, psychological and nutritional aspects in women with hidradenitis suppurativa. J Transl Med. 2025;23:167. 10.1186/s12967-025-06175-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Scala E, Cacciapuoti S, Garzorz-Stark N, Megna M, Marasca C, Seiringer P, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa: where we are and where we are going. Cells. 2021;10:2094. 10.3390/cells10082094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sabat R, Alavi A, Wolk K, Wortsman X, McGrath B, Garg A, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa. Lancet. 2025;405:420–38. 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02475-9. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 7.Krajewski PK, Matusiak Ł, Szepietowski JC. Adipokines as an important link between hidradenitis suppurativa and obesity: a narrative review. Br J Dermatol. 2023;188:320–7. 10.1093/bjd/ljac107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zouboulis CC, Bechara FG, Benhadou F, Bettoli V, Bukvić Mokos Z, Del Marmol V, et al. European S2k guidelines for hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa part 2: treatment. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol JEADV. 2025;39:899–941. 10.1111/jdv.20472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jfri A, Nassim D, O’Brien E, Gulliver W, Nikolakis G, Zouboulis CC. Prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157:924. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.1677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bouazzi D, Nielsen SM, Hagan PG, Botvid S, Hove LS, Prens EP, et al. Prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa: a meta-analysis of global hidradenitis suppurativa atlas studies. JAMA Dermatol. 2025;161:1022. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jemec GBE. Hidradenitis suppurativa. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:158–64. 10.1056/NEJMcp1014163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Phan K, Charlton O, Smith SD. Global prevalence of hidradenitis suppurativa and geographical variation—systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Dermatol. 2020;4:2. 10.1186/s41702-019-0052-0. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marukian NV, Hu R-H, Craiglow BG, Milstone LM, Zhou J, Theos A, et al. Expanding the genotypic spectrum of bathing suit ichthyosis. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:537. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zouboulis CC, Nogueira Da Costa A, Fimmel S, Zouboulis KC. Apocrine glands are bystanders in hidradenitis suppurativa and their involvement is gender specific. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;(34):1555–63. 10.1111/jdv.16264. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 15.Kromann C, Ibler K, Kristiansen V, Jemec G. The Influence of body weight on the prevalence and severity of hidradenitis suppurativa. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014;94:553–7. 10.2340/00015555-1800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Von Der Werth J, Williams H. The natural history of hidradenitis suppurativa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14:389–92. 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00087.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zouboulis CC, Desai N, Emtestam L, Hunger RE, Ioannides D, Juhász I, et al. European S1 guideline for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015;29:619–44. 10.1111/jdv.12966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alikhan A, Lynch PJ, Eisen DB. Hidradenitis suppurativa: a comprehensive review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60:539–61. 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zouboulis CC, Tzellos T, Kyrgidis A, Jemec GBE, Bechara FG, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, et al. Development and validation of the International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS 4), a novel dynamic scoring system to assess HS severity. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177:1401–9. 10.1111/bjd.15748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tzellos T, Van Straalen KR, Kyrgidis A, Alavi A, Goldfarb N, Gulliver W, et al. Development and validation of IHS4-55, an IHS4 dichotomous outcome to assess treatment effect for hidradenitis suppurativa. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023;37:395–401. 10.1111/jdv.18632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oranges T, Vitali S, Benincasa B, Izzetti R, Lencioni R, Caramella D, et al. Advanced evaluation of hidradenitis suppurativa with ultra-high frequency ultrasound: a promising tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of disease progression. Skin Res Technol. 2020;26:513–9. 10.1111/srt.12823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miller IM, McAndrew RJ, Hamzavi I. Prevalence, risk factors, and comorbidities of hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol Clin. 2016;34:7–16. 10.1016/j.det.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sabat R, Tsaousi A, Ghoreschi K, Wolk K, Schneider-Burrus S. Sex-disaggregated population analysis in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Front Med. 2022;9:1028943. 10.3389/fmed.2022.1028943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Boer J, Nazary M, Riis PT. The Role of Mechanical Stress in Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Dermatol Clin. 2016;34:37–43. 10.1016/j.det.2015.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lindsø Andersen P, Kromann C, Fonvig CE, Theut Riis P, Jemec GBE, Holm J. Hidradenitis suppurativa in a cohort of overweight and obese children and adolescents. Int J Dermatol. 2020;59:47–51. 10.1111/ijd.14639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ma EJ, Roberts AM, Chou P, Katz A, Jeong CY, Nong Y, et al. Chronic companions: an updated national cross-sectional study of metabolic syndrome comorbidities in outpatient visits for hidradenitis suppurativa. PLoS ONE. 2025;20:e0333010. 10.1371/journal.pone.0333010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Saito-Sasaki N, Sawada Y. The development of systemic inflammatory diseases in hidradenitis suppurativa. Diagnostics. 2023;13:502. 10.3390/diagnostics13030502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mintoff D, Agius R, Fava S, Pace NP. Investigating Adiposity-Related Metabolic Health Phenotypes in Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Clin Med. 2023;12:4847. 10.3390/jcm12144847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Krajewski PK, Złotowska A, Szepietowski JC. The Therapeutic Potential of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in the Management of Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review of Anti-Inflammatory and Metabolic Effects. J Clin Med. 2024;13:6292. 10.3390/jcm13216292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Molinelli E, Morresi C, Dragonetti ML, De Simoni E, Candelora M, Marasca S, et al. Oxidative stress, high density lipoproteins and hidradenitis suppurativa: a prospective study. Antioxidants. 2025;14:1014. 10.3390/antiox14081014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Barrea L, Verde L, Annunziata G, Antiga E, Camajani E, Caprio M, et al. Medical Nutrition Therapy in Dermatological Diseases: a Joint Consensus Statement of the Italian Association of Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition (ADI), the Italian Society of Dermatology and Sexually Transmitted Diseases (SIDeMaST), the Italian Society of Nutraceuticals (SINut), Club Ketodiets and Nutraceuticals “KetoNut-SINut” and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), Club Nutrition, Hormones and Metabolism. Curr Obes Rep. 2025;14:42. 10.1007/s13679-025-00630-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 32.Skroza N, Mambrin A, Proietti I, Balduzzi V, Bernardini N, Marchesiello A, et al. Evaluation of cardiovascular risk in hidradenitis suppurativa patients using Heart Rate Variability (HRV) analysis. Cardiovasc Ther. 2020;2020:1–7. 10.1155/2020/1321782. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Frings VG, Gläsel M, Rau M, Geier A, Fleißner J, Presser D, et al. High prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a guide to easily assess the clinical risk of comorbid liver disease. JID Innov. 2026;6:100419. 10.1016/j.xjidi.2025.100419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sy SMT, Eder L, Jerome D, Obetta C, McKee H, Mirza R, et al. Prevalence and predictors of inflammatory arthritis in hidradenitis suppurativa. Exp Dermatol. 2024;33:e15194. 10.1111/exd.15194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lönndahl L, Najeeb M, Killasli H, Emtestam L, Ludwig RJ, Curman P. Bidirectional risk association between hidradenitis suppurativa and inflammatory bowel disease. Acta Derm Venereol. 2025;(105):adv43657. 10.2340/actadv.v105.43657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 36.Resnik SR, Geisler EL, Reyes N, Lozano J, Ramirez-Caussade R, Resnik BI. Prevalence and risk factors for anemia in a population with hidradenitis suppurativa. Cureus. 2020;12:e12015. 10.7759/cureus.12015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gupta AK, Economopoulos V, Mirmirani P, Magalhaes R. Understanding the evolving treatment landscape of hidradenitis suppurativa: an analysis of All of Us. Scala E, editor. PLOS One. 2025;(20):e0331032. 10.1371/journal.pone.0331032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 38.Von Stebut-Marx J, Preissner R, Schneider-Burrus S, Preissner S. Hidradenitis suppurativa and ocular diseases: real-world evidence of 57,972 patients. Acta Derm Venereol. 2025;105:adv42716. 10.2340/actadv.v105.42716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jo JJ, Verma H, Alani O, Kasi A, Ayub M, Gulati N, et al. Risk of ophthalmologic comorbidities in hidradenitis suppurativa patients. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2025;33:2046–52. 10.1080/09273948.2025.2550487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jastrząb B, Szepietowski JC, Matusiak Ł. Hidradenitis suppurativa and follicular occlusion syndrome: Where is the pathogenetic link? Clin Dermatol. 2023;41:576–83. 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rosi E, Fastame MT, Silvi G, Guerra P, Nunziati G, Di Cesare A, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa: the influence of gender, the importance of trigger factors and the implications for patient habits. Biomedicines. 2022;10:2973. 10.3390/biomedicines10112973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Holgersen N, Rosenø NAL, Nielsen VW, Hjorthøj C, Nordentoft M, Garg A, et al. Risk of new-onset and recurrent depression and anxiety among patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. JAMA Dermatol. 2025;161:1014. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Xiong G, Mehta S, Metko D, McMullen EP, Couturier J, Liu C, et al. Disordered eating in hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review. JAMA Dermatol. 2025;161:1167. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yook HJ, Kim E, Kim YH, Lee G-N, Han K, Lee JH. A link between smoking behaviors and the risk of hidradenitis suppurativa in diabetic patients. Scala E, editor. PLOS One. 2025;(20):e0325357. 10.1371/journal.pone.0325357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 45.Moltrasio C, Tricarico PM, Romagnuolo M, Marzano AV, Crovella S. Hidradenitis suppurativa: a perspective on genetic factors involved in the disease. Biomedicines. 2022;10:2039. 10.3390/biomedicines10082039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Eble SM, Wisco OJ, Boccuto L, Laffin B, Parker VG, Davis NJ, et al. Genetic factors associated with hidradenitis suppurativa, a literature review. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2024;10:e158. 10.1097/JW9.0000000000000158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Muret K, Le Goff V, Dandine-Roulland C, Hotz C, Jean-Louis F, Boisson B, et al. Comprehensive catalog of variants potentially associated with hidradenitis suppurativa, including newly identified variants from a cohort of 100 patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:10374. 10.3390/ijms251910374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.van Straalen KR, Prens EP, Willemsen G, Boomsma DI, van der Zee HH. Contribution of genetics to the susceptibility to hidradenitis suppurativa in a large, cross-sectional Dutch twin cohort. JAMA Dermatol. 2020;156:1359–62. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 49.Wang B, Yang W, Wen W, Sun J, Su B, Liu B, et al. Gamma-secretase gene mutations in familial acne inversa. Science. 2010;(330):1065. 10.1126/science.1196284. New York, N.Y. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 50.Lamarre MC. The IUHE’s regional structures. Hygie. 1987;6:5–8. PMID:3428907. [PubMed]
  • 51.Aubin-Houzelstein G. Notch signaling and the developing hair follicle. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2012;727:142–60. 10.1007/978-1-4614-0899-4_11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Melnik BC, Plewig G. Impaired Notch-MKP-1 signalling in hidradenitis suppurativa: an approach to pathogenesis by evidence from translational biology. Exp Dermatol. 2013;22:172–7. 10.1111/exd.12098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Melnik BC, John SM, Chen W, Plewig G. T helper 17 cell/regulatory T-cell imbalance in hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: the link to hair follicle dissection, obesity, smoking and autoimmune comorbidities. Br J Dermatol. 2018;179:260–72. 10.1111/bjd.16561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Khan A, Gould PA, Luo Y, Prens EP, Wheless L, Hung AM, et al. The polygenic architecture of hidradenitis suppurativa reveals signaling mechanisms that implicate epithelial remodeling. MedRxiv Prepr Serv Health Sci. 2025;(2025). 10.1101/2025.07.25.25332168.
  • 55.Wendland Z, Teerlink CC, Pridgen KM, Lo S, Sayed C, Van Straalen KR, et al. A genome-wide association study of hidradenitis suppurativa from the VA’s Million Veteran Program. MedRxiv Prepr Serv Health Sci. 2025;(2025). 10.1101/2025.06.23.25330121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 56.Sun Y, Lou F, Cai X, Wang Z, Yang X, Sun L, et al. CCR7+ dendritic cells expressing both IL-23A and IL-12B potentially contribute to psoriasis relapse. Nat Commun. 2025;16:7581. 10.1038/s41467-025-62874-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Stüfchen I, Beyer F, Staebler S, Fischer S, Kappelmann M, Beckervordersandforth R, et al. Sox9 regulates melanocytic fate decision of adult hair follicle stem cells. iScience. 2023;(26):106919. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 58.Yang Y, Gomez N, Infarinato N, Adam RC, Sribour M, Baek I, et al. The pioneer factor SOX9 competes for epigenetic factors to switch stem cell fates. Nat Cell Biol. 2023;25:1185–95. 10.1038/s41556-023-01184-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Lyu Y, Guan Y, Deliu L, Humphrey E, Frontera JK, Yang YJ, et al. KLF5 governs sphingolipid metabolism and barrier function of the skin. Genes Dev. 2022;36:822–42. 10.1101/gad.349662.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Savva A, Kanni T, Damoraki G, Kotsaki A, Giatrakou S, Grech I, et al. Impact of Toll-like receptor-4 and tumour necrosis factor gene polymorphisms in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:311–7. 10.1111/bjd.12105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Giatrakos S, Huse K, Kanni T, Tzanetakou V, Kramer M, Grech I, et al. Haplotypes of IL-12Rβ1 impact on the clinical phenotype of hidradenitis suppurativa. Cytokine. 2013;62:297–301. 10.1016/j.cyto.2013.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Burke OM, Frerichs VR, Garcia DF, Stone RC, Lev-Tov H, Czarnowicki T, et al. The impact of innate immunity and epigenetics in the pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1593253. 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1593253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jin L, Chen Y, Muzaffar S, Li C, Mier-Aguilar CA, Khan J, et al. Epigenetic switch reshapes epithelial progenitor cell signatures and drives inflammatory pathogenesis in hidradenitis suppurativa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120:e2315096120. 10.1073/pnas.2315096120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Naik HB, Lowes MA. A call to accelerate hidradenitis suppurativa research and improve care—moving beyond burden. JAMA Dermatol. 2019;155:1005. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Flora A, Jepsen R, Kozera EK, Woods JA, Cains GD, Radzieta M, et al. Mast cells are upregulated in hidradenitis suppurativa tissue, associated with epithelialized tunnels and normalized by spleen tyrosine kinase antagonism. Exp Dermatol. 2024;33:e14894. 10.1111/exd.14894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lowe MM, Naik HB, Clancy S, Pauli M, Smith KM, Bi Y, et al. Immunopathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa and response to anti–TNF-α therapy. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e139932. 10.1172/jci.insight.139932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nisar S, Roberson JL, Carney BC, Alkhalil A, Moffatt LT, Shupp JW. Further histological and cellular characterization of hidradenitis suppurativa in 11 patients. Eplasty. 2019;19:e21. eCollection 2019. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 68.Virone M, Zappia E, Di Caro A, Carlesimo D, Bernardini N, Pellacani G, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa: state-of-the-art review and update. Dermatol Rep. 2025;(2025). 10.4081/dr.2025.10328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 69.Roth SA, Simanski M, Rademacher F, Schröder L, Harder J. The pattern recognition receptor NOD2 mediates staphylococcus aureus–Induced IL-17C expression in keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:374–80. 10.1038/jid.2013.313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Juárez E, Carranza C, Hernández-Sánchez F, Loyola E, Escobedo D, León-Contreras JC, et al. Nucleotide-oligomerizing domain-1 (NOD1) receptor activation induces pro-inflammatory responses and autophagy in human alveolar macrophages. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:152. 10.1186/1471-2466-14-152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Prescott D, Maisonneuve C, Yadav J, Rubino SJ, Girardin SE, Philpott DJ. NOD2 modulates immune tolerance via the GM-CSF–dependent generation of CD103+ dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:10946–57. 10.1073/pnas.1912866117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Zhang Q-J, Feng Y-B, Chen X, Mo X-H, Wu Q, Ju Q. Macrophage Polarization and Crosstalk Between Macrophages and Other Cells in Hidradenitis Suppurativa. Int J Dermatol Venereol. 2025;8:106–13. 10.1097/JD9.0000000000000382. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rumberger BE, Boarder EL, Owens SL, Howell MD. Transcriptomic analysis of hidradenitis suppurativa skin suggests roles for multiple inflammatory pathways in disease pathogenesis. Inflamm Res. 2020;69:967–73. 10.1007/s00011-020-01381-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Shah A, Alhusayen R, Amini-Nik S. The critical role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa. Inflamm Res. 2017;66:931–45. 10.1007/s00011-017-1074-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Mariottoni P, Jiang SW, Prestwood CA, Jain V, Suwanpradid J, Whitley MJ, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals cellular and transcriptional changes associated with M1 macrophage polarization in hidradenitis suppurativa. Front Med. 2021;8:665873. 10.3389/fmed.2021.665873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hayran Y, Allı N, Yücel Ç, Akdoğan N, Turhan T. Serum IL-36α, IL-36β, and IL-36γ levels in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: association with disease characteristics, smoking, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Arch Dermatol Res. 2020;312:187–96. 10.1007/s00403-019-02012-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sugiura K, Fujita H, Komine M, Yamanaka K, Akiyama M. The role of interleukin-36 in health and disease states. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024;38:1910–25. 10.1111/jdv.19935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Frew JW. Unravelling the complex pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2025;192:3–14. 10.1093/bjd/ljae238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Moran B, Sweeney CM, Hughes R, Malara A, Kirthi S, Tobin A-M, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa is characterized by dysregulation of the Th17:Treg cell axis, which is corrected by anti-TNF therapy. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137:2389–95. 10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Diller RB, Tabor AJ. The role of the Extracellular Matrix (ECM) in wound healing: a review. Biomimetics. 2022;7:87. 10.3390/biomimetics7030087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Narla S, Azzam M, Townsend S, Vellaichamy G, Marzano AV, Alavi A, et al. Identifying key components and therapeutic targets of the immune system in hidradenitis suppurativa with an emphasis on neutrophils. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184:1004–13. 10.1111/bjd.19538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sabat R, Šimaitė D, Gudjonsson JE, Brembach T-C, Witte K, Krause T, et al. Neutrophilic granulocyte-derived B-cell activating factor supports B cells in skin lesions in hidradenitis suppurativa. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2023;151:1015–26. 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.10.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ahmad F, Alam MA, Ansari AW, Jochebeth A, Leo R, Al-Abdulla MN, et al. Emerging role of the IL-36/IL-36R axis in multiple inflammatory skin diseases. J Invest Dermatol. 2024;144:206–24. 10.1016/j.jid.2023.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sanchez J, Le Jan S, Muller C, François C, Renard Y, Durlach A, et al. Matrix remodelling and MMP expression/activation are associated with hidradenitis suppurativa skin inflammation. Exp Dermatol. 2019;28:593–600. 10.1111/exd.13919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Tabib T, Morse C, Wang T, Chen W, Lafyatis R. SFRP2/DPP4 and FMO1/LSP1 define major fibroblast populations in human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2018;138:802–10. 10.1016/j.jid.2017.09.045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chu C-Q, Quan T. Fibroblast Yap/Taz signaling in extracellular matrix homeostasis and tissue fibrosis. J Clin Med. 2024;13:3358. 10.3390/jcm13123358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Van Linthout S, Miteva K, Tschope C. Crosstalk between fibroblasts and inflammatory cells. Cardiovasc Res. 2014;102:258–69. 10.1093/cvr/cvu062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Di X, Chen J, Li Y, Wang M, Wei J, Li T, et al. Crosstalk between fibroblasts and immunocytes in fibrosis: from molecular mechanisms to clinical trials. Clin Transl Med. 2024;14:e1545. 10.1002/ctm2.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Kazemi A, Fathy M, Jahanian A, Khanali J, Ostadi Y, Babajani A, et al. The role of MMPs and TIMPs in regenerative medicine: from pathological ECM remodeling to therapeutic applications. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025;191:118457. 10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Wang K, Wen D, Xu X, Zhao R, Jiang F, Yuan S, et al. Extracellular matrix stiffness—the central cue for skin fibrosis. Front Mol Biosci. 2023;10:1132353. 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1132353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chuang H-M, Chen Y-S, Harn H-J. The versatile role of matrix metalloproteinase for the diverse results of fibrosis treatment. Molecules. 2019;24:4188. 10.3390/molecules24224188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Giannandrea M, Parks WC. Diverse functions of matrix metalloproteinases during fibrosis. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7:193–203. 10.1242/dmm.012062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Mozeika E, Pilmane M, Nürnberg B, Jemec G. Tumour necrosis factor-alpha and matrix metalloproteinase-2 are expressed strongly in hidradenitis suppurativa. Acta Derm Venereol. 2013;93:301–4. 10.2340/00015555-1492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Goliwas KF, Kashyap MP, Khan J, Sinha R, Weng Z, Oak ASW, et al. Ex vivo culture models of hidradenitis suppurativa for defining molecular pathogenesis and treatment efficacy of novel drugs. Inflammation. 2022;45:1388–401. 10.1007/s10753-022-01629-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Howard EW, Crider BJ, Updike DL, Bullen EC, Parks EE, Haaksma CJ, et al. MMP-2 expression by fibroblasts is suppressed by the myofibroblast phenotype. Exp Cell Res. 2012;318:1542–53. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2012.03.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Visse R, Nagase H. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, function, and biochemistry. Circ Res. 2003;92:827–39. 10.1161/01.RES.0000070112.80711.3D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Cabral-Pacheco GA, Garza-Veloz I, Castruita-De La Rosa C, Ramirez-Acuña JM, Perez-Romero BA, Guerrero-Rodriguez JF, et al. The roles of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in human diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;(21):9739. 10.3390/ijms21249739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 98.Kandhwal M, Behl T, Singh S, Sharma N, Arora S, Bhatia S, et al. Role of matrix metalloproteinase in wound healing. Am J Transl Res. 2022;7:4391–405. PMID: 35958464. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 99.Wolosowicz M, Prokopiuk S, Kaminski TW. The complex role of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) in health and disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:13691. 10.3390/ijms252413691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Radbill BD, Gupta R, Ramirez MCM, DiFeo A, Martignetti JA, Alvarez CE, et al. loss of matrix metalloproteinase-2 amplifies murine toxin-induced liver fibrosis by upregulating collagen I expression. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:406–16. 10.1007/s10620-010-1296-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Wang M, Zhao D, Spinetti G, Zhang J, Jiang L-Q, Pintus G, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase 2 activation of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and TGF-β1–type II receptor signaling within the aged arterial wall. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2006;26:1503–9. 10.1161/01.ATV.0000225777.58488.f2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Molnar J, Mallonee CJ, Stanisic D, Homme RP, George AK, Singh M, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa and 1-carbon metabolism: role of gut microbiome, matrix metalloproteinases, and hyperhomocysteinemia. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1730. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sidhom E, Pilmane M, Kisis J. Local antimicrobial, protease and cytokine defense systems in psoriatic skin. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016;82:284. 10.4103/0378-6323.171652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Holm Nielsen S, Groen SS, Yao Y, Jørgensen AHR, Nielsen VW, Karsdal M, et al. Biomarkers of tissue turnover and systemic inflammation are associated with disease severity and activity in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. J Invest Dermatol. 2023;143:328–31. 10.1016/j.jid.2022.08.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Kashyap MP, Khan J, Sinha R, Jin L, Atigadda V, Deshane JS, et al. Advances in molecular pathogenesis of hidradenitis suppurativa: dysregulated keratins and ECM signaling. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2022;128:120–9. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Dancer RCA, Wood AM, Thickett DR. Metalloproteinases in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J. 2011;38:1461–7. 10.1183/09031936.00024711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.García-Prieto E, González-López A, Cabrera S, Astudillo A, Gutiérrez-Fernández A, Fanjul-Fernandez M, et al. Resistance to bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in MMP-8 deficient mice is mediated by interleukin-10. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e13242. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Fuchs S, Skwara A, Bloch M, Dankbar B. Differential induction and regulation of matrix metalloproteinases in osteoarthritic tissue and fluid synovial fibroblasts. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2004;12:409–18. 10.1016/j.joca.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Tsaousi A, Witte E, Witte K, Röwert-Huber H-J, Volk H-D, Sterry W, et al. MMP8 is increased in lesions and blood of acne inversa patients: a potential link to skin destruction and metabolic alterations. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:1–8. 10.1155/2016/4097574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Velasquez M, O’Sullivan C, Brockett R, Mikels-Vigdal A, Mikaelian I, Smith V, et al. Characterization of active MMP9 in chronic inflammatory diseases using a novel anti-MMP9 antibody. Antibodies. 2023;12:9. 10.3390/antib12010009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Löffek S, Schilling O, Franzke C-W. Biological role of matrix metalloproteinases: a critical balance. Eur Respir J. 2011;38:191–208. 10.1183/09031936.00146510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Wieman TJ. Introduction to care of chronic wounds. Am J Surg. 1998;9610(98):1S – 9610. 10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00179-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.O’Toole EA. Extracellular matrix and keratinocyte migration: Extracellular matrix and keratinocyte migration. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:525–30. 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2001.00891.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Chen P, Parks WC. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in epithelial migration. J Cell Biochem. 2009;108:1233–43. 10.1002/jcb.22363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Wang Y, Jiao L, Qiang C, Chen C, Shen Z, Ding F, et al. The role of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in fibrosis diseases and its molecular mechanisms. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;171:116116. 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.116116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Leong E, Bezuhly M, Marshall JS. Distinct metalloproteinase expression and functions in systemic sclerosis and fibrosis: what we know and the potential for intervention. Front Physiol. 2021;12:727451. 10.3389/fphys.2021.727451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Kim W-U, Min S-Y, Cho M-L, Hong K-H, Shin Y-J, Park S-H, et al. Elevated matrix metalloproteinase-9 in patients with systemic sclerosis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2004;7:R71. 10.1186/ar1454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Manuel JA, Gawronska-Kozak B. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) is upregulated during scarless wound healing in athymic nude mice. Matrix Biol. 2006;25:505–14. 10.1016/j.matbio.2006.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Lachowski D, Cortes E, Rice A, Pinato D, Rombouts K, Del Rio HA. Matrix stiffness modulates the activity of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in hepatic stellate cells to perpetuate fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9:7299. 10.1038/s41598-019-43759-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Szántó M, Dózsa A, Antal D, Szabó K, Kemény L, Bai P. Targeting the gut-skin axis-Probiotics as new tools for skin disorder management? Exp Dermatol. 2019;28:1210–8. 10.1111/exd.14016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Queirós C, Lisboa C, Magina S. Unveiling the microbiome’s role in hidradenitis suppurativa: a comprehensive review of pathogenetic mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26:9542. 10.3390/ijms26199542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Johnson CE, Naik HB. Microbiome perturbations in hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol Clin. 2025;43:193–202. 10.1016/j.det.2024.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Naim A, Baig MS. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) regulates the activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) through the ERK-mediated pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2020;467:107–16. 10.1007/s11010-020-03705-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Shehab MJ, AL-Mofarji ST, Mahdi BM, Ameen RS, AL-Zubaidi MM. The correlation between obesity and leptin signaling pathways. Cytokine. 2025;192:156970. 10.1016/j.cyto.2025.156970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Tilg H, Ianiro G, Gasbarrini A, Adolph TE. Adipokines: masterminds of metabolic inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2025;25:250–65. 10.1038/s41577-024-01103-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Khalili-Tanha G, Radisky ES, Radisky DC, Shoari A. Matrix metalloproteinase-driven epithelial-mesenchymal transition: implications in health and disease. J Transl Med. 2025;23:436. 10.1186/s12967-025-06447-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Arpino V, Brock M, Gill SE. The role of TIMPs in regulation of extracellular matrix proteolysis. Matrix Biol. 2015;44:247–54. 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Churg A, Müller NL. Cellular vs fibrosing interstitial pneumonias and prognosis. Chest. 2006;130:1566–70. 10.1378/chest.130.5.1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Krebber MM, Van Dijk CGM, Vernooij RWM, Brandt MM, Emter CA, Rau CD, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in extracellular matrix remodeling during left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:6742. 10.3390/ijms21186742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Ngu JMC, Teng G, Meijndert HC, Mewhort HE, Turnbull JD, Stetler-Stevenson WG, et al. Human cardiac fibroblast extracellular matrix remodeling: dual effects of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2014;23:335–43. 10.1016/j.carpath.2014.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Stetler-Stevenson WG. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases in cell signaling: metalloproteinase-independent biological activities. Sci Signal. 2008;(1). 10.1126/scisignal.127re6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 132.Gill SE, Parks WC. Metalloproteinases and their inhibitors: regulators of wound healing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2008;40:1334–47. 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.10.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.English WR, Ireland-Zecchini H, Baker AH, Littlewood TD, Bennett MR, Murphy G. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase–3 (TIMP-3) induces FAS dependent apoptosis in human vascular smooth muscle cells. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0195116. 10.1371/journal.pone.0195116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Fan D, Kassiri Z. Biology of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3), and its therapeutic implications in cardiovascular pathology. Front Physiol. 2020;11:661. 10.3389/fphys.2020.00661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Fan D, Takawale A, Basu R, Patel V, Lee J, Kandalam V, et al. Differential role of TIMP2 and TIMP3 in cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, and diastolic dysfunction. Cardiovasc Res. 2014;103:268–80. 10.1093/cvr/cvu072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Kashiwagi M, Tortorella M, Nagase H, Brew K. TIMP-3 is a potent inhibitor of aggrecanase 1 (ADAM-TS4) and aggrecanase 2 (ADAM-TS5). J Biol Chem. 2001;276:12501–4. 10.1074/jbc.C000848200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Gendron C, Kashiwagi M, Hughes C, Caterson B, Nagase H. TIMP-3 inhibits aggrecanase-mediated glycosaminoglycan release from cartilage explants stimulated by catabolic factors. FEBS Lett. 2003;555:431–6. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01295-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Kassiri Z, Oudit GY, Kandalam V, Awad A, Wang X, Ziou X, et al. Loss of TIMP3 enhances interstitial nephritis and fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1223–35. 10.1681/ASN.2008050492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Hu R-P, Lu Y-Y, Zhang X-J. MiR-34b-5p knockdown attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by targeting tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3). Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23:2273–9. 10.26355/eurrev_201903_17276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Hu W, Zhu H, Gong F. Leptin and leptin resistance in obesity: current evidence, mechanisms and future directions. Endocr Connect. 2025;14:e250521. 10.1530/EC-25-0521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Al-Hassi HO, Bernardo D, Murugananthan AU, Mann ER, English NR, Jones A, et al. A mechanistic role for leptin in human dendritic cell migration: differences between ileum and colon in health and Crohn’s disease. Mucosal Immunol. 2013;6:751–61. 10.1038/mi.2012.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Mattioli B, Straface E, Matarrese P, Quaranta MG, Giordani L, Malorni W, et al. Leptin as an immunological adjuvant: enhanced migratory and CD8+ T cell stimulatory capacity of human dendritic cells exposed to leptin. FASEB J. 2008;22:2012–22. 10.1096/fj.07-098095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Gerriets VA, Danzaki K, Kishton RJ, Eisner W, Nichols AG, Saucillo DC, et al. Leptin directly promotes T-cell glycolytic metabolism to drive effector T-cell differentiation in a mouse model of autoimmunity. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46:1970–83. 10.1002/eji.201545861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Deng K, Pelekos G, Jin L, Tonetti MS. Diagnostic accuracy of a point‐of‐care aMMP‐8 test in the discrimination of periodontal health and disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48:1051–65. 10.1111/jcpe.13485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Reynoso-Roa AS, Gutiérrez-Rubio SA, Magallón-Gastélum E, García-Iglesias T, Suárez-Rico DO, García-Cobián TA. The role of resistin in macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes. Life. 2025;15:585. 10.3390/life15040585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Jha JC, Ho F, Dan C, Jandeleit-Dahm K. A causal link between oxidative stress and inflammation in cardiovascular and renal complications of diabetes. Clin Sci. 2018;132:1811–36. 10.1042/CS20171459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Dal Canto E, Ceriello A, Rydén L, Ferrini M, Hansen TB, Schnell O, et al. Diabetes as a cardiovascular risk factor: an overview of global trends of macro and micro vascular complications. Aboyans V, Cosentino F, editors. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;(26):25–32. 10.1177/2047487319878371. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 148.Osborne LC, Joyce KL, Alenghat T, Sonnenberg GF, Giacomin PR, Du Y, et al. Resistin-like molecule α promotes pathogenic Th17 cell responses and bacterial-induced intestinal inflammation. J Immunol. 2013;190:2292–300. 10.4049/jimmunol.1200706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Sherly A A, M.S R, Hegde A, S A, Kotian H. Serum levels of omentin and visfatin in patients with metabolic syndrome. Arch Physiol Biochem. 2025;(131):683–90. 10.1080/13813455.2025.2486290. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 150.Mercurio L, Albanesi C, Madonna S. Recent Updates on the involvement of PI3K/AKT/mTOR molecular cascade in the pathogenesis of hyperproliferative skin disorders. Front Med. 2021;8:665647. 10.3389/fmed.2021.665647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Esfahani M, Movahedian A, Baranchi M, Goodarzi MT. Adiponectin: an adipokine with protective features against metabolic syndrome. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2015;(18). PMID: 26124928. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 152.Liu C, Li X. Role of leptin and adiponectin in immune response and inflammation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2025;161:115082. 10.1016/j.intimp.2025.115082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Wilk S, Scheibenbogen C, Bauer S, Jenke A, Rother M, Guerreiro M, et al. Adiponectin is a negative regulator of antigen-activated T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2011;41:2323–32. 10.1002/eji.201041349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Zhang K, Guo Y, Ge Z, Zhang Z, Da Y, Li W, et al. Adiponectin suppresses T helper 17 cell differentiation and limits autoimmune CNS inflammation via the SIRT1/PPARγ/RORγt pathway. Mol Neurobiol. 2017;54:4908–20. 10.1007/s12035-016-0036-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Khoramipour K, Chamari K, Hekmatikar AA, Ziyaiyan A, Taherkhani S, Elguindy NM, et al. Adiponectin: structure, physiological functions, role in diseases, and effects of nutrition. Nutrients. 2021;13:1180. 10.3390/nu13041180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Surendar J, Frohberger SJ, Karunakaran I, Schmitt V, Stamminger W, Neumann A-L, et al. Adiponectin limits IFN-γ and IL-17 producing CD4 T cells in obesity by restraining cell intrinsic glycolysis. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2555. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Kirichenko TV, Markina YV, Bogatyreva AI, Tolstik TV, Varaeva YR, Starodubova AV. The role of adipokines in inflammatory mechanisms of obesity. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:14982. 10.3390/ijms232314982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Malara A, Hughes R, Jennings L, Sweeney CM, Lynch M, Awdeh F, et al. Adipokines are dysregulated in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2018;178:792–3. 10.1111/bjd.15904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.González-López MA, Vilanova I, Ocejo-Viñals G, Arlegui R, Navarro I, Guiral S, et al. Circulating levels of adiponectin, leptin, resistin and visfatin in non-diabetics patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Arch Dermatol Res. 2020;312:595–600. 10.1007/s00403-019-02018-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Nigro E, Polito R, Babino G, Mattera E, Fulgione E, Ragozzino G, et al. Adiponectin contributes to the inflammatory milieu in hidradenitis suppurativa. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022;12:e2022157. 10.5826/dpc.1204a157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Münzberg H, Morrison CD. Structure, production and signaling of leptin. Metabolism. 2015;64:13–23. 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.09.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Saxena NK, Titus MA, Ding X, Floyd J, Srinivasan S, Sitaraman SV, et al. Leptin as a novel profibrogenic cytokine in hepatic stellate cells: mitogenesis and inhibition of apoptosis mediated by extracellular regulated kinase (Erk) and Akt phosphorylation. FASEB J. 2004;18:1612–4. 10.1096/fj.04-1847fje. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Polyzos SA, Kountouras J, Mantzoros CS. Leptin in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a narrative review. Metabolism. 2015;64:60–78. 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.10.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Ikejima K, Takei Y, Honda H, Hirose M, Yoshikawa M, Zhang Y-J, et al. Leptin receptor–mediated signaling regulates hepatic fibrogenesis and remodeling of extracellular matrix in the rat. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:1399–410. 10.1053/gast.2002.32995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Wang J, Leclercq I, Brymora JM, Xu N, Ramezani-Moghadam M, London RM, et al. Kupffer cells mediate leptin-induced liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:713-723.e1. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Cayón A, Crespo J, Mayorga M, Guerra A, Pons-Romero F. Increased expression of Ob-Rb and its relationship with the overexpression of TGF-β1 and the stage of fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Liver Int. 2006;26:1065–71. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2006.01337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Zibadi S, Cordova F, Slack EH, Watson RR, Larson DF. Leptin’s regulation of obesity-induced cardiac extracellular matrix remodeling. Cardiovasc Toxicol. 2011;11:325–33. 10.1007/s12012-011-9124-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Leifheit-Nestler M, Wagner N-M, Gogiraju R, Didié M, Konstantinides S, Hasenfuss G, et al. Importance of leptin signaling and signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 activation in mediating the cardiac hypertrophy associated with obesity. J Transl Med. 2013;11:170. 10.1186/1479-5876-11-170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Martínez-Martínez E, Jurado-López R, Valero-Muñoz M, Bartolomé MV, Ballesteros S, Luaces M, et al. Leptin induces cardiac fibrosis through galectin-3, mTOR and oxidative stress: potential role in obesity. J Hypertens. 2014;32:1104–14. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Martínez-Martínez E, Rodríguez C, Galán M, Miana M, Jurado-López R, Bartolomé MV, et al. The lysyl oxidase inhibitor (β-aminopropionitrile) reduces leptin profibrotic effects and ameliorates cardiovascular remodeling in diet-induced obesity in rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2016;92:96–104. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Cao Q, Mak KM, Ren C, Lieber CS. Leptin stimulates tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in human hepatic stellate cells. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:4292–304. 10.1074/jbc.M308351200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Cao Q, Mak KM, Lieber CS. Leptin represses matrix metalloproteinase-1 gene expression in LX2 human hepatic stellate cells. J Hepatol. 2007;46:124–33. 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Takawale A, Zhang P, Patel VB, Wang X, Oudit G, Kassiri Z. Tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 promotes myocardial fibrosis by mediating CD63–integrin β1 interaction. Hypertension. 2017;69:1092–103. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.09045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Schram K, Ganguly R, No EK, Fang X, Thong FSL, Sweeney G. Regulation of MT1-MMP and MMP-2 by leptin in cardiac fibroblasts involves Rho/ROCK-dependent actin cytoskeletal reorganization and leads to enhanced cell migration. Endocrinology. 2011;152:2037–47. 10.1210/en.2010-1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Dadson K, Chasiotis H, Wannaiampikul S, Tungtrongchitr R, Xu A, Sweeney G. Adiponectin mediated APPL1-AMPK signaling induces cell migration, MMP activation, and collagen remodeling in cardiac fibroblasts: adiponectin action in cardiac fibroblasts. J Cell Biochem. 2014;115:785–93. 10.1002/jcb.24722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Cai X, Chen L, Li L, Feng M, Li X, Zhang K, et al. Adiponectin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced adventitial fibroblast migration and transition to myofibroblasts via AdipoR1-AMPK-iNOS pathway. Mol Endocrinol. 2010;24:218–28. 10.1210/me.2009-0128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Jen H-L, Liu P-L, Chen Y-H, Yin W-H, Chen J-W, Lin S-J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α reduces endothelin-1-caused cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by inhibiting nuclear factor- κ B and adiponectin. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:1–11. 10.1155/2016/5609121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Handy JA, Fu PP, Kumar P, Mells JE, Sharma S, Saxena NK, et al. Adiponectin inhibits leptin signalling via multiple mechanisms to exert protective effects against hepatic fibrosis. Biochem J. 2011;440:385–95. 10.1042/BJ20102148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Handy JA, Saxena NK, Fu P, Lin S, Mells JE, Gupta NA, et al. Adiponectin activation of AMPK disrupts leptin-mediated hepatic fibrosis via suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS-3). J Cell Biochem. 2010;110:1195–207. 10.1002/jcb.22634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Ramezani-Moghadam M, Wang J, Ho V, Iseli TJ, Alzahrani B, Xu A, et al. Adiponectin reduces hepatic stellate cell migration by promoting Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) secretion. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:5533–42. 10.1074/jbc.M114.598011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Luo L, Li J, Wu Y, Qiao J, Fang H. Adiponectin, but Not TGF-β1, CTGF, IL-6 or TNF-α, may be a potential anti-inflammation and anti-fibrosis factor in keloid. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:907–16. 10.2147/JIR.S301971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Wang X, Yan X, Huang F, Wu L. Adiponectin inhibits TGF-β1-induced skin fibroblast proliferation and phenotype transformation via the p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Open Life Sci. 2023;18:20220679. 10.1515/biol-2022-0679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Darmawan CC, Montenegro SE, Jo G, Kusumaningrum N, Lee S-H, Chung J-H, et al. Adiponectin-Based Peptide (ADP355) inhibits transforming growth factor-β1-induced fibrosis in keloids. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:2833. 10.3390/ijms21082833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Wanninger J, Walter R, Bauer S, Eisinger K, Schäffler A, Dorn C, et al. MMP-9 activity is increased by adiponectin in primary human hepatocytes but even negatively correlates with serum adiponectin in a rodent model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Exp Mol Pathol. 2011;91:603–7. 10.1016/j.yexmp.2011.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Singh R, Kaundal RK, Zhao B, Bouchareb R, Lebeche D. Resistin induces cardiac fibroblast-myofibroblast differentiation through JAK/STAT3 and JNK/c-Jun signaling. Pharmacol Res. 2021;167:105414. 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Deb A, Deshmukh B, Ramteke P, Bhati FK, Bhat MK. Resistin: a journey from metabolism to cancer. Transl Oncol. 2021;14:101178. 10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Zhao C-W, Gao Y-H, Song W-X, Liu B, Ding L, Dong N, et al. An update on the emerging role of resistin on the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Mediators Inflamm. 2019;2019:1–8. 10.1155/2019/1532164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Heo YJ, Choi S, Lee N, Jeon JY, Han SJ, Kim DJ, et al. Visfatin exacerbates hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in a methionine-choline-deficient diet mouse model. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;36:2592–600. 10.1111/jgh.15465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Sun BL, Sun X, Kempf CL, Song JH, Casanova NG, Camp SM, et al. Involvement of eNAMPT / TLR4 inflammatory signaling in progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, steatohepatitis, and fibrosis. FASEB J. 2023;37:e22825. 10.1096/fj.202201972RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Ezzati-Mobaser S, Malekpour-Dehkordi Z, Nourbakhsh M, Tavakoli-Yaraki M, Ahmadpour F, Golpour P, et al. The up-regulation of markers of adipose tissue fibrosis by visfatin in pre-adipocytes as well as obese children and adolescents. Cytokine. 2020;134:155193. 10.1016/j.cyto.2020.155193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Torretta S, Colombo G, Travelli C, Boumya S, Lim D, Genazzani AA, et al. The cytokine nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (eNAMPT; PBEF; Visfatin) acts as a natural antagonist of C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5). Cells. 2020;9:496. 10.3390/cells9020496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Managò A, Audrito V, Mazzola F, Sorci L, Gaudino F, Gizzi K, et al. Extracellular nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase binds Toll like receptor 4 and mediates inflammation. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4116. 10.1038/s41467-019-12055-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Colombo G, Travelli C, Porta C, Genazzani AA. Extracellular nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase boosts IFNγ-induced macrophage polarization independently of TLR4. iScience. 2022;25:104147. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Masson R, Shih T, Jeong C, Shi VY, Hsiao JL. Hormonal treatments in hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review. J Drugs Dermatol JDD. 2023;(22):785–94. 10.36849/jdd.7325. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 195.Cuenca-Barrales C, Montero-Vílchez T, Sánchez-Díaz M, Martínez-López A, Rodríguez-Pozo JÁ, Díaz-Calvillo P, et al. Intralesional treatments in hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review. Dermatology. 2022;238:1084–91. 10.1159/000524121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Riis PT, Boer J, Prens EP, Saunte DML, Deckers IE, Emtestam L, et al. Intralesional triamcinolone for flares of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS): a case series. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;75:1151–5. 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Wiala A, Daschl SM, Stockinger T, Rappersberger K, Posch C. Oral fusidic acid for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hidradenitis suppurativa. Int J Dermatol. 2024;63:1205–11. 10.1111/ijd.17115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Caposiena Caro RD, Cannizzaro MV, Botti E, Di Raimondo C, Di Matteo E, Gaziano R, et al. Clindamycin versus clindamycin plus rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment: clinical and ultrasound observations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:1314–21. 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Dessinioti C, Zisimou C, Tzanetakou V, Stratigos A, Antoniou C. Oral clindamycin and rifampicin combination therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa: a prospective study and 1-year follow-up. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2016;41:852–7. 10.1111/ced.12933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Van Straalen KR, Tzellos T, Guillem P, Benhadou F, Cuenca-Barrales C, Daxhelet M, et al. The efficacy and tolerability of tetracyclines and clindamycin plus rifampicin for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa: results of a prospective European cohort study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85:369–78. 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.12.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Matusiak Ł, Bieniek A, Szepietowski JC. Acitretin treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa: a prospective series of 17 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171:170–4. 10.1111/bjd.12884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Iannone M, Janowska A, Bartolomei G, Puntoni M, Oranges T, Romanelli M, et al. Systemic antibiotics in hidradenitis suppurativa: efficacy and effects of body mass index and smoking pack-year on the response to therapy. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34:e14919. 10.1111/dth.14919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Orylska-Ratynska M, Placek W, Owczarczyk-Saczonek A. Tetracyclines—an important therapeutic tool for dermatologists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:7246. 10.3390/ijerph19127246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Weinberg JM. The anti-inflammatory effects of tetracyclines. Cutis. 2005;75:6–11. PMID: 15916224. [PubMed]
  • 205.Gener G, Canoui-Poitrine F, Revuz JE, Faye O, Poli F, Gabison G, et al. Combination therapy with clindamycin and rifampicin for hidradenitis suppurativa: a series of 116 consecutive patients. Dermatology. Basel, Switzerland. 2009;(219):148–54. 10.1159/000228334. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 206.Ramalingam A, Hirai A, Thompson EA. Glucocorticoid inhibition of fibroblast proliferation and regulation of the cyclin kinase inhibitor p21Cip1. Mol Endocrinol. 1997;(11):577–86. 10.1210/mend.11.5.9923. Baltimore, Md. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 207.Jennings L, Hambly R, Hughes R, Moriarty B, Kirby B. Metformin use in hidradenitis suppurativa. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020;31:261–3. 10.1080/09546634.2019.1592100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Cho M, Woo YR, Cho SH, Lee JD, Kim HS. Metformin: a potential treatment for acne, hidradenitis suppurativa and rosacea. Acta Derm Venereol. 2023;(103):adv18392. 10.2340/actadv.v103.18392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 209.Senent-Valero M, Matijasevich A, Jara-Rico N, Sivera F, Pascual JC. Drug survival of metformin in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2023;190:125–7. 10.1093/bjd/ljad364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Petrasca A, Hambly R, Kearney N, Smith CM, Pender EK, Mac Mahon J, et al. Metformin has anti-inflammatory effects and induces immunometabolic reprogramming via multiple mechanisms in hidradenitis suppurativa. Br J Dermatol. 2023;189:730–40. 10.1093/bjd/ljad305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Gouvrion L, Delage M, Villani AP, Le Naour S, Fite C, Cassius C, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in hidradenitis suppurativa. JAMA Dermatol. 2025;161:1084. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.2723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Sánchez-Feliciano A, Herrera H, Charrow A, Barbieri JS. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the adjunctive treatment of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025;93:1334–7. 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.06.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Faurschou A, Pedersen J, Gyldenløve M, Poulsen SS, Holst JJ, Thyssen JP, et al. Increased expression of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors in psoriasis plaques. Exp Dermatol. 2013;22:150–2. 10.1111/exd.12081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Chen P, Lin L, Xu X, Zhang Z, Cai W, Shao Z, et al. Liraglutide improved inflammation via mediating IL-23/Th-17 pathway in obese diabetic mice with psoriasiform skin. J Dermatol Treat. 2021;32:745–51. 10.1080/09546634.2019.1708853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Nagae K, Uchi H, Morino-Koga S, Tanaka Y, Oda M, Furue M. Glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide facilitates wound healing by activating PI3K/Akt pathway in keratinocytes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;146:155–61. 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Strong J, Driscoll MS. Obesity in hidradenitis suppurativa: are GLP-1 receptor agonists the new frontier? Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025;26:175–82. 10.1007/s40257-024-00911-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Paschou IA, Sali E, Paschou SA, Psaltopoulou T, Nicolaidou E, Stratigos AJ. The effects of GLP-1RA on inflammatory skin diseases: a comprehensive review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025;39:2047–55. 10.1111/jdv.20694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Henry T, Cahn B, Haber R, Landers JT, Berger-Fleishman R, Alam M, et al. Therapeutic potential of GLP-1 agonists for hidradenitis suppurativa. Int J Dermatol. 2023;62:1543–4. 10.1111/ijd.16892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Jennings L, Nestor L, Molloy O, Hughes R, Moriarty B, Kirby B. The treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with the glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist liraglutide. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177:858–9. 10.1111/bjd.15233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Péč MJ, Jurica J, Péčová M, Nagy N, Focko B, Miertová Z, et al. Effect of submaximal doses of semaglutide in patients with obesity on metabolic profile and serum levels of adipocytokines. Pharmaceuticals. 2025;18:1364. 10.3390/ph18091364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Cao Y, Hong F, Conlon DM, Sidur L, Smith KM, Fang Y, et al. Potential predictive biomarkers of adalimumab response in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa*. Br J Dermatol. 2021;185:804–14. 10.1111/bjd.20097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Kyriakou A, Trigoni A, Galanis N, Sotiriadis D, Patsatsi A. Efficacy of adalimumab in moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: real life data. Dermatol. 2018;(10). 10.4081/dr.2018.7859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 223.Nazzaro G, Calzari P, Passoni E, Vaienti S, Moltrasio C, Barbareschi M, et al. Vascularization and fibrosis are important ultrasonographic tools for assessing response to adalimumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: prospective study of 32 patients. Dermatol Ther. 2021;(34). 10.1111/dth.14706. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 224.Islam Z, Wong JH, Alicea DS, Choi S, Andriano TM, Campton K. Three-week infliximab dosing is associated with improved disease control in severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a retrospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2026;94:310–2. 10.1016/j.jaad.2025.09.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Sahoo BR, Dikhit MR, Bhoi GK, Maharana J, Lenka SK, Dubey PK, et al. Understanding the distinguishable structural and functional features in zebrafish TLR3 and TLR22, and their binding modes with fish dsRNA viruses: an exploratory structural model analysis. Amino Acids. 2015;47:381–400. 10.1007/s00726-014-1872-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Calabrese L, Cartocci A, Rubegni P, French LE, Kendziora B. Efficacy and safety of biologics for hidradenitis suppurativa: a network meta-analysis of phase III trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2026;40:637–45. 10.1111/jdv.20617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Hafner A, Ghislain PD, Kovács R, Batchelor R, Katoulis AC, Kirby B, et al. Improvement in hidradenitis suppurativa and quality of life in patients treated with adalimumab: real-world results from the HARMONY study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021;35:2277–84. 10.1111/jdv.17551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Zouboulis CC, Okun MM, Prens EP, Gniadecki R, Foley PA, Lynde C, et al. Long-term adalimumab efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa/acne inversa: 3-year results of a phase 3 open-label extension study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:60-69.e2. 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.05.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Nosrati A, Torpey ME, Shokrian N, Ch’en PY, Andriano TM, Benesh G, et al. Adalimumab efficacy is inversely correlated with body mass index (BMI) in hidradenitis suppurativa. Int J Dermatol. 2023;(62):764–9. 10.1111/ijd.16565. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 230.Cao Y, Harvey BP, Hong F, Ruzek M, Wang J, Murphy ER, et al. Adalimumab induces a wound healing profile in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa by regulating macrophage differentiation and matrix metalloproteinase expression. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:2730–40. 10.1016/j.jid.2021.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Sahl RE, Poggi AI, Nielsen VW, Yao Y, Patsi I, Poulsen SS, et al. Adalimumab treatment effects on inflammation and adipose tissue mitochondrial respiration in hidradenitis suppurativa. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2024;7:e70002. 10.1002/edm2.70002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Erbağcı E, Karstarlı Bakay ÖS, Hapa FA. Secukinumab treatment in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa in real-world clinical settings: a multicenter study. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2025;15:4915. 10.5826/dpc.1501a4915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Kimball AB, Bechara FG, Badat A, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Gottlieb AB, Jemec GBE, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa: week 104 results from the SUNSHINE and SUNRISE extension trial. Br J Dermatol. 2025;192:629–40. 10.1093/bjd/ljae469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Mansilla-Polo M, García-Moronta C, Fernández-Crehuet P, Garbayo-Salmons P, Pons-Benavent M, Aguilar-González L, et al. Long-term effectiveness and safety of bimekizumab in patients with moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa under real clinical practice conditions: the importance of combined treatment in Hurley III patients and potential factors associated with complete response. Dermatol Ther. 2025;15:3267–83. 10.1007/s13555-025-01521-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Roccuzzo G, Repetto F, Giordano S, Sarda C, Comes A, Dapavo P, et al. Anti-IL17 Secukinumab in hidradenitis suppurativa: a long-term drug survival analysis. Exp Dermatol. 2024;33:e15140. 10.1111/exd.15140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Pender EK, Carroll E, Visan MA, Hughes R, Kirby B. Bimekizumab for treatment of moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a real-world, single-centre case series. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2026;(140). 10.1093/ced/llag140. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 237.Glatt S, Jemec GBE, Forman S, Sayed C, Schmieder G, Weisman J, et al. Efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in moderate to severe hidradenitis suppurativa: a phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157:1279. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 238.Sisto M, Lisi S. Targeting interleukin-17 as a novel treatment option for fibrotic diseases. J Clin Med. 2023;13:164. 10.3390/jcm13010164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Martora F, Tommasino N, Coronella L, Potestio L, Battista T, Megna M. Guselkumab in a subset of multifailure patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: real-word evidence from Federico II. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2025;18:2387–93. 10.2147/CCID.S544180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Van Der Zee HH, Prens EP, Boer J. Deroofing: a tissue-saving surgical technique for the treatment of mild to moderate hidradenitis suppurativa lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:475–80. 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Ovadja ZN, Jacobs W, Zugaj M, Van Der Horst CMAM, Lapid O. Recurrence rates following excision of hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dermatol Surg. 2020;46:e1-7. 10.1097/DSS.0000000000002403. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Garg A, Hsiao J, Porter ML, Shi V. Current Treatments and Future Directions for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: a Narrative Review of Completed and Ongoing Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Biologic Therapies. Dermatol Ther. 2025;15:2361–77. 10.1007/s13555-025-01487-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Frew JW, Jiang CS, Singh N, Grand D, Navrazhina K, Vaughan R, et al. Dermal tunnels influence time to clinical response and family history influences time to loss of clinical response in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa treated with adalimumab. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021;46:306–13. 10.1111/ced.14448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Kirby JS, Okun MM, Alavi A, Bechara FG, Zouboulis CC, Brown K, et al. Efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase 1 inhibitor povorcitinib (INCB054707) in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa in a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90:521–9. 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.10.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Gudjonsson JE, Tsoi LC, Ma F, Billi AC, Van Straalen KR, Vossen ARJV, et al. Contribution of plasma cells and B cells to hidradenitis suppurativa pathogenesis. JCI Insight. 2020;5:e139930. 10.1172/jci.insight.139930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.McDonald C, Xanthopoulos C, Kostareli E. The role of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase in the immune system and disease. Immunology. 2021;164:722–36. 10.1111/imm.13416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Liu KH, Zhou N, Zou Y, Yang YY, OuYang SX, Liang YM. Spleen Tyrosine Kinase (SYK) in the progression of peritoneal fibrosis through activation of the TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling pathway. Med Sci Monit Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2019;(25):9346–56. 10.12659/MSM.917287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 248.Jepsen R, Edwards C, Flora A, Kozera E, Frew JW. A proof-of-concept open-label clinical trial of spleen tyrosine kinase antagonism using fostamatinib in moderate-to-severe hidradenitis suppurativa. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;89:694–702. 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.05.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Flora A, Jepsen R, Kozera EK, Woods JA, Cains GD, Radzieta M, et al. Human dermal fibroblast subpopulations and epithelial mesenchymal transition signals in hidradenitis suppurativa tunnels are normalized by spleen tyrosine kinase antagonism in vivo. Singh K, editor. PLOS ONE. 2023;(18):e0282763. 10.1371/journal.pone.0282763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 250.Liu S, Liao Y, Chen B, Chen Y, Yu Z, Wei H, et al. Critical role of Syk-dependent STAT1 activation in innate antiviral immunity. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108627. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Ring HC, Yao Y, Maul J-T, Ingram JR, Frew JW, Thorsen J, et al. The road to biologics in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa: a nationwide drug utilization study. Br J Dermatol. 2022;187:523–30. 10.1111/bjd.21673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Liu M, Degner J, Georgantas RW, Nader A, Mostafa NM, Teixeira HD, et al. A genetic variant in the BCL2 gene associates with adalimumab response in hidradenitis suppurativa clinical trials and regulates expression of BCL2. J Invest Dermatol. 2020;140:574-582.e2. 10.1016/j.jid.2019.06.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Sandborn WJ, Bhandari BR, Randall C, Younes ZH, Romanczyk T, Xin Y, et al. Andecaliximab [Anti-matrix Metalloproteinase-9] induction therapy for ulcerative colitis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 study in patients with moderate to severe disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2018;12:1021–9. 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Ooki A, Satoh T, Muro K, Takashima A, Kadowaki S, Sakai D, et al. A phase 1b study of andecaliximab in combination with S-1 plus platinum in Japanese patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2022;12:11007. 10.1038/s41598-022-13801-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Molecular Biomedicine are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES