Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1971 Mar;15(2):221–231. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-221

Sequential patterns in post-reinforcement pauses on fixed-interval schedules of food1

Richard L Shull
PMCID: PMC1333805  PMID: 16811505

Abstract

Responding by one pigeon was reinforced with food on fixed-interval schedules of 30, 60, and 300 sec duration. A second pigeon was studied under fixed-interval durations of 60 and 300 sec. For both birds, the average post-reinforcement pause was one-half the duration of the fixed interval. Autocorrelation coefficients revealed first-order sequential dependencies in series of post-reinforcement pauses. On the 300-sec fixed-interval schedule, successive post-reinforcement tended to alternate between long and short durations. At the shorter fixed-interval durations there was less evidence of alternation sequences. A second experiment was conducted to determine if the time intervals between the first response after reinforcement and the next reinforcement (the work periods) were responsible for the alternation patterns in the series of post-reinforcement pauses. To evaluate the role of the work period, several procedures were used to modify the work period from that obtained on the fixed-interval 300-sec schedule. Adding a schedule to the fixed-interval schedule that set the minimum amount of time that could elapse between the first response after reinforcement and the next reinforcement eliminated the alternation pattern. Control schedules indicated that the elimination of alternation patterns resulted from constraints on the work period per se and not from confounded changes in the interreinforcement intervals.

Full text

PDF
221

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZZI R., FIX D. S., KELLER F. S., ROCHAESILVA M. I. EXTEROCEPTIVE CONTROL OF RESPONSE UNDER DELAYED REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Mar;7:159–162. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FARMER J., SCHOENFELD W. N. EFFECTS OF A DRL CONTINGENCY ADDED TO A FIXED-INTERVAL REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Nov;7:391–399. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HERRNSTEIN R. J., MORSE W. H. A conjunctive schedule of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1958 Jan;1:15–24. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1958.1-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kelleher R. T., Morse W. H. Schedules using noxious stimuli. IV: An interlocking shock-postponement schedule in the squirrel monkey. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):1063–1079. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keller J. V. Delayed escape from light by the albino rat. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Nov;9(6):655–658. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Killeen P. Reinforcement frequency and contingency as factors in fixed-ratio behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):391–395. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Neuringer A. J., Schneider B. A. Separating the effects of interreinforcement time and number of interreinforcement responses. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):661–667. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Schneider B. A. A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):677–687. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shull R. L., Brownstein A. J. Interresponse time duration in fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement: control by ordinal position and time since reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):49–53. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Shull R. L. The response-reinforcement dependency in fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):55–60. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Staddon J. E. Multiple fixed-interval schedules: transient contrast and temporal inhibition. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):583–590. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. WERTHEIM G. A. SOME SEQUENTIAL ASPECTS OF IRTS EMITTED DURING SIDMAN-AVOIDANCE BEHAVIOR IN THE WHITE RAT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jan;8:9–15. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Weiss B., Laties V. G., Siegel L., Goldstein D. A computer analysis of serial interactions in spaced responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Nov;9(6):619–626. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES