Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1971 Sep;16(2):143–154. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-143

The removal and restoration of stimulus control1

L T Stoddard, Murray Sidman
PMCID: PMC1333859  PMID: 5001104

Abstract

When a well-learned circle versus ellipse discrimination was made impossibly difficult for the subjects (rhesus monkeys), the controlling stimulus-response topographies were replaced by competing topographies. The identification of two training conditions sufficient to reinstate the original discrimination permitted the following inferences: the original controlling topography had merely decreased in probability of occurrence, whereas the “strength” of the stimulus-response relation remained unchanged; discriminations along the apparently continuous circle-ellipse dimension actually involved several distinct stimulus-control topographies.

Full text

PDF
143

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blough D. S. Attention shifts in a maintained discrimination. Science. 1969 Oct 3;166(3901):125–126. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3901.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. MIGLER B. EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:303–307. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Migler B., Millenson J. R. Analysis of response rates during stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):81–87. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. PROKASY W. F., HALL J. F. Primary stimulus generalization. Psychol Rev. 1963 Jul;70:310–322. doi: 10.1037/h0049354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ray B. A. Selective attention: the effects of combining stimuli which control incompatible behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):539–550. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ray B. A. The course of acquisition of a line-tilt discrimination by rhesus monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):17–33. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sidman M. Generalization gradients and stimulus control in delayed matching-to-sample. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):745–757. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sidman M., Stoddard L. T. The effectiveness of fading in programming a simultaneous form discrimination for retarded children. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):3–15. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Skinner B. F. The Abolishment of a Discrimination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1933 Sep;19(9):825–828. doi: 10.1073/pnas.19.9.825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Stoddard L. T., Sidman M. Stimulus control after intradimensional discrimination training. Psychol Rep. 1971 Feb;28(1):147–157. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1971.28.1.147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stoddard L. T., Sidman M. The effects of errors on children's performance on a circle-ellipse discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 May;10(3):261–270. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES