Abstract
The effects of changing signal frequency on a prolonged vigilance task were investigated by systematically increasing the average inter-trial interval between successive signals. During a 6-hr watch, vigilance performance remained constant when the rate of signal presentation was 40, 20, and 10 per hour. When the rate of signal presentation was reduced to 7 or 4 per hour, marked decrements in detection performance were observed. Similar vigilance decrements occurred when the average rate of signals per hour was kept constant (10 per hour) and the probability of receiving a shock for missing a signal was systematically varied. The results of this study indicate the importance of reinforcement factors in the control and maintenance of vigilance performance.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- HOLLAND J. G. Human vigilance: the rate of observing an instrument is controlled by the schedule of signal detections. Science. 1958 Jul 11;128(3315):61–67. doi: 10.1126/science.128.3315.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JENKINS H. M. The effect of signal-rate on performance in visual monitoring. Am J Psychol. 1958 Dec;71(4):647–661. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JERISON H. J., PICKETT R. M. VIGILANCE: A REVIEW AND RE-EVALUATION. Hum Factors. 1963 Jun;5:211–238. doi: 10.1177/001872086300500305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MASON J. W. Restraining chair for the experimental study of primates. J Appl Physiol. 1958 Jan;12(1):130–133. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1958.12.1.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NICELY P. E., MILLER G. A. Some effects of unequal spatial distribution on the detectability of radar targets. J Exp Psychol. 1957 Mar;53(3):195–198. doi: 10.1037/h0039930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]