Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2026 Jun 17;148(25):26171–26183. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6c05314

Hydrogen Bonding within Dynamic 19F‑Tagged Oligothiourea Foldamers in Solution and in Membranes

Lucia Trevisan 1,*, Kathryn S Foster 1, Jonathan Clayden 1,*
PMCID: PMC13339130  PMID: 42306889

Abstract

Molecular conformation plays an integral role in biological signal transduction, with several classes of biomolecules using conformational changes to translate local inputs into spatially remote outputs. This natural communication mechanism has inspired the development of dynamic foldamers with the ability to use conformational changes as a communication mechanism. These foldamers include ethylene-bridged hydrogen-bonded oligo­(thio)­urea foldamers with reversible hydrogen-bond polarity. Using p-fluorobenzyl capping groups, we show that 1H and 19F variable-temperature and 2D NMR reveal details of the directionality and resilience of the intramolecular hydrogen-bond network of these dynamic foldamers at a range of temperatures. Crucially, 19F VT NMR allowed the dynamic behavior of the foldamers to be studied in micelles and bicelles, into which they were readily incorporated. The intactness of the network was investigated both in solution and in membrane-mimetic environments by 19F NMR spectroscopy for foldamers containing between two and five thioureas. With longer foldamers, the high resolution and sensitivity of the fluorine probes allowed intermediates in the global hydrogen-bond directionality reversal process to be identified. These findings reveal subtleties in the conformational preferences of hydrogen-bonded foldamers that have relevance to their use as communication devices both in solution and in membranes separating compartmentalized environments.


graphic file with name ja6c05314_0013.jpg


graphic file with name ja6c05314_0011.jpg

Introduction

Inspired by nature’s use of conformational switching to relay signals through molecular structures, for example, in receptor kinases and G-protein-coupled receptors, chemists have developed classes of extended molecules with switchable conformations that are maintained by coherent networks of hydrogen bonds. − We have reported several families of such “dynamic foldamers” which are capable of communicating information, adopting multiple well-defined conformations while retaining overall structural definition. Global inversion of helical screw sense in oligomeric structures built from α-aminoisobutyric acid (Aib) residues (Figure a) has been used as a conformational relay mechanism, translating input signals such as a chiral acid, light, − or a chiral ligand, to spatially remote sites, detected through fluorescence emission, NMR spectroscopy, , or a change in selectivity. With the aim of using these dynamic foldamers as mimics of transmembrane proteins, Aib foldamers have been incorporated into the membrane of vesicles , or micelles. 19F NMR has proved especially useful for monitoring conformational switching in foldamer systems, both in solution and in the membrane phase, ,, as the chemical shifts of 19F labels are very sensitive to changes in environment in both small molecules , and proteins. −

1.

1

Molecular communication of information through (a) chirality switching of a helical foldamer and (b) hydrogen bond polarity reversal of an oligo­(thio)­urea foldamer.

Switching of global hydrogen bond directionality has more recently also been demonstrated as a communication mechanism, initially in hydrogen-bonded oligourea helices built from cyclohexane-1,2-diamine units, , and more recently in achiral ethylene-bridged oligoureas and thioureas (Figure b). ,, The directionality of the global intramolecular hydrogen bonding network in these dynamic foldamers may be modulated using input signals such as pH or anion complexation, and monitored by output signals such as fluorescence, capture and release of a ligand, or activation of nucleophilicity by induced tautomerism at a remote site. The oligo­(thio)­urea “ribbon” has lower conformational rigidity than the oligo-Aib helix, making it a more versatile scaffold, and achiral communication mechanisms based (like the genetic code) on hydrogen bond directionality, rather than chirality, have greater potential for use in homochiral biological environments. However, further applications of the ethylene-bridged oligoureas are limited by the lack of detailed information on the structure and dynamics of their hydrogen bonding networks, whether in solution or in the membrane phase.

In this paper, we show for the first time that oligothiourea foldamers can insert into membrane mimics. We demonstrate the use of 19F NMR as a means of probing the conformational dynamics of these oligomers in solution, and we show that 19F NMR can also reveal details of conformational preference in the membrane phase. These techniques allow a comparison of the conformational dynamics and hydrogen-bond resilience of the same molecules both in solution and in membrane mimics.

Approach

The wealth of structural information provided by NMR spectroscopy at a range of temperatures in solution has provided a detailed picture of the dynamic behavior of poly-Aib foldamers − and has likewise illuminated some important aspects of the conformational kinetics of oligourea scaffolds. However, the application of this spectroscopic technique to study molecules embedded in colloids is constrained by several factors: the size of the particles, which often results in very broad signals due to the slow tumbling rate, the high concentration of lipid, detergent, or buffer compared to the molecule of interest needed to obtain a stable suspension, and the limited temperature range that can be explored. In this study, we reveal ways to overcome these challenges, comparing the dynamic behavior of oligothiourea foldamers in solution and in different membrane-mimetic environments.

The chemical shift of the 19F NMR nucleus is highly sensitive to its environment, the 19F isotope is present at 100% natural abundance, and 19F NMR spectra are uncluttered by signals from solvent or nonfluorinated membrane components such as lipids or detergents. The dispersion of the 19F NMR chemical shift range is 100-fold larger than that of 1H NMR due to the paramagnetic shielding from the fluorine lone pairs, which allows 19F NMR to amplify subtle differences in chemical environments at the N- and C-terminus of a foldamer: fluorine probes adjacent to hydrogen-bond donors and hydrogen-bond acceptors display distinct chemical shifts. We therefore envisaged that fluorine probes within ethylene-bridged oligothioureas would reveal detailed kinetic and thermodynamic information about the structure and hydrogen bond networks of these foldamers, both in solution and in the membrane phase. To do this, we synthesized a series of ethylene-bridged oligothiourea foldamers 2–5, along with the reference monomeric thiourea 1 (Figure a), capped by terminal 4-fluorobenzyl groups to provide 19F NMR probes. n-Butyl side chains were chosen to avoid the complication of π-π stacking interactions between the terminal thioureas and these capping groups.

2.

2

(a) Hydrogen-bonded oligourea foldamers 2–5 and reference monomer 1 with 19F-tagged capping groups (b) to study the foldamers’ dynamics (c) in organic solvents, in micelles and bicelles.

In comparison with previous oligourea foldamers, ,, the intramolecular hydrogen-bonded networks of thioureas in 2–5 are expected to exhibit higher barriers to rotation ΔG ‡ about the C–N bonds , that may be increased even more significantly by the presence of a hydrogen-bond acceptor. The detailed study of conformational processes by dynamic NMR requires signals relating to different conformers to undergo intermediate or slow exchange on the NMR time scale at accessible temperatures, and hydrogen-bonded conformers with opposite directionalities (Figure b) fulfill this requirement as they will be in slow exchange above 273 K. Flexing of the scaffold backbone between anti and gauche conformers and rotation of side chains also occur, but these are invariably fast on the NMR time scale. The slower conformational interconversion of thiourea C–N bonds thus allows dynamic NMR to filter out the conformational dynamics of the hydrogen-bond network, both in solution and in colloidal systems dispersed in water, uncluttered by inconsequential rotation of the aliphatic chains. Throughout this paper, we therefore use the term “conformer” to refer exclusively to the ensemble of conformers associated with a single thiourea C–N rotamer. With these oligothiourea foldamers 2–5 in hand, we set out to quantify the structure and dynamics of their intramolecular hydrogen bond networks by NMR spectroscopy, both in organic solvents (deuterated chloroform and DCM) and in colloidal particles, specifically micelles and bicelles (Figure c).

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of the Oligomers

Compounds 1–5 were synthesized by the route shown in Figure . The synthesis of 1 and 2 employed the reductive amination of a commercial amine or diamine to give an oligo­(ethylenediamine) backbone carrying two fluorine probes. Functionalization with n-butyl isothiocyanate installed the thiourea side chains. The synthesis of 3, 4, and 5 first necessitated protection of the terminal NH2 sites of the commercial polyamine prior to installation of the central n-Bu thiourea side chains. Subsequent deprotection, reductive amination, and n-Bu thiourea side-chain installation then provided access to the full homologous series of 1–5.

3.

3

Synthesis of (a) reference monomer 1 and oligothiourea foldamers (b) 2 and (c) 3-5.

Dynamic Conformation of Oligothiourea Foldamers in Solution

The conformational dynamics of the intramolecular hydrogen-bonding network in reference compound 1 and foldamers 2–5 were first investigated in solution, using both 1H and 19F NMR spectroscopy (Figure ). Reference compound 1 contains no intramolecular hydrogen bond, and thus, in the 1H NMR spectrum, it exhibited only one NHA (see labeling in Figure a) peak at 5.41 ppm at 298 K (Figure c). The presence of a single intramolecular hydrogen bond in compound 2 resulted in a broad signal at 6.45 ppm for the two NH signals (NHA and NHA′) in the 1H spectrum at 298 K (Figure c). Cooling the sample to 248 K led to their decoalescence into two separate peaks at 5.33 and 7.94 ppm (Figure c). Given the difference in chemical shift of 2.6 ppm, the upfield peak corresponds to the non-hydrogen-bonded NHA and the downfield signal to the hydrogen-bonded NHA′. , Longer foldamers 3-5 all exhibit a single NH peak at an upfield chemical shift (5.35 ppm for 3, 5.39 ppm for 4, 5.37 ppm for 5) and a series of more downfield NH peaks (7.75 ppm for 3; 7.87 ppm, 7.98 ppm for 4; 7.78 ppm, 7.98 ppm, 8.10 ppm, 8.20 ppm for 5) at 298 K (Figure c). The upfield signals each correspond to the terminal NHA that is not involved in the intramolecular hydrogen-bonded network, and their chemical shifts are comparable to the (evidently non-hydrogen-bonded) NHA peak of reference compound 1, at 5.41 ppm. For example, in the rotating frame overhauser enhancement spectroscopy (ROESY) experiment for 3 (Figure b) only, the NHA peak exhibits a ROE cross-peak with the benzylic H5 signals (green highlight). Thus, the series of downfield peaks, which are deshielded by at least 2.4 ppm, belong to the intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded NHB and NHA′ signals. ,

4.

4

NMR study of oligothioureas foldamers 1–5 conformation in solution. (a) Molecular structures of 1–5 with NMR labels. (b) 500 MHz 1H–1H ROESY spectrum of 3 (8 mM) in CDCl3 at 248 K. A green highlight shows that H5 has an ROE cross-peak with NHA, and no ROE cross-peaks with NHA′ or NHB. (c) 500 MHz 1H VT NMR spectra of 1–5 (8 mM) at 298, 278 and 248 K in CDCl3. (d) 565 MHz 19F VT NMR spectra of 1–5 (8 mM) at 308, 298 and 278 K in CDCl3.

The partitioning of the NH groups in each oligomer 2–5 indicates that, typically, all of them except for one (i.e., NHA) are in hydrogen-bonded environments, suggesting a single coherent hydrogen-bonded chain of thiourea groups for all these compounds. The decoalescence of the benzylic protons H5 and H5′ of the capping groups for 2–5 at around 4–5 ppm gives at least two peaks with different line shapes at 248 K that overlap with neighboring signals (Figure c). However, due to its higher sensitivity and more disperse frequency range, 19F NMR allowed the analysis of this complex conformational behavior, with multiple fluorine environments evident in the longer oligomers (Figure d). In the 19F NMR spectrum, monomer 1 shows a single sharp peak arising from two NH environments in fast exchange down to 278 K, the lower C–N rotational barrier being due to the absence of an intramolecular hydrogen bond. Moving to dimer 2, significant 19F NMR peak broadening implies a shift to intermediate exchange at 298 K, and further toward slow exchange at 278 K with two equally integrating peaks (Figure d), presumably because the dimer possesses one intramolecular hydrogen bond which must be broken and then reformed in order to exchange the environments of the two fluorine probes. Upon introduction of a second intramolecular hydrogen bond, in trimer 3, two distinct 19F NMR peaks appear, indicating that the fluorine probes in the trimer are in slow exchange even up to 308 K. The two peaks integrate equally (with no change in NMR spectra upon cooling to 278 K), which is consistent with 3 populating only the pair of degenerate conformers shown in Figure a, in which the thiourea units are linked by a coherent chain of hydrogen bonds. It is likely that the clear separation into two well-resolved peaks here is also facilitated by cooperativity effects, which enhance the difference in chemical shift of the two fluorine probes relative to the dimer by increasing the electron richness of the terminal thiourea CS unit and the electron deficiency of the terminal thiourea N–H unit.

5.

5

Analysis of the conformation of 3 in solution by NMR. (a) Molecular structure of 3 and NMR labels. (b) 500 MHz 1H VT NMR of 3 (10 mM) in CD2Cl2 at 298, 278 and 248 K. (c) 565 MHz 19F VT NMR of 3 (10 mM) in CD2Cl2 at 298 and 278 K. (d) 500 MHz 1H–1H ROESY of 3 (10 mM) in CD2Cl2 at 248 K. An orange highlight shows that NHA has an exchange cross-peak with NHA′, an ROE cross-peak with H5 and no ROE cross-peak with H5′. A green highlight shows that H5′ has an ROE cross-peak with H3′ and an exchange cross-peak with H5. (e) 500 MHz 1H–1H COSY of 3 (10 mM) in CD2Cl2 at 248 K. (f) 400 MHz 1H–19F HMBC of 3 (10 mM) in CD2Cl2 at 278 K.

The situation changes significantly upon moving to tetramer 4, which shows two 19F NMR peaks with different line widths and integrals at 298 K. On cooling of the sample to 278 K, these two peaks decoalesce to reveal five different peaks, with characteristic line shapes (one sharp, four broad), indicating the population of multiple conformers. The 19F NMR spectrum for pentamer 5 increases in complexity even further, showing at least three 19F NMR signals at 308 K.

The intricate NMR spectra of 3-5 were assigned by means of detailed 1H and 19F VT NMR analysis, using the more uniform conformational population of trimer 3 and the better resolution in CD2Cl2 compared to CDCl3 to validate methods for assigning NMR signals that were then applied to tetramer 4. We were able to assign the two 19F NMR signals to the N-terminal and the C-terminal environments of trimer 3 by a series of homonuclear and heteronuclear correlations (Figure a) in the 1H and 19F NMR spectra. At 298 K (Figure b), the 1H NMR spectrum shows three NH peaks: at 5.41 ppm for NHA (in orange, clearly non-hydrogen bonded, and hence located at the N-terminus), at 7.51 ppm (broad peak) and 7.80 ppm for NHA′ and NHB, respectively (both hydrogen bonded). The benzylic protons appear as two equally integrating signals at 5.14 ppm for H5′ and 4.49 ppm for H5. The assignment of the signal at 4.49 ppm to H5, i.e., the N-terminal benzylic position, was made through a ROESY correlation with the (non-hydrogen bonded) NHA, a correlation that was absent for the C-terminal H5′ signal at 5.14 ppm (orange highlight in Figure d). The two 19F NMR signals (Figure c) at −116.44 ppm (N-terminal F1, blue) and at −117.85 ppm (C-terminal F1′, red) were likewise unequivocally assigned through a series of 2D NMR correlations as shown in Figure a: ROEs between N-terminal H5 and the signals H2, H3 of its associated aromatic ring (which are resolved by decoalescence at 248 K – see 1H in Figure b, green highlight in ROESY in Figure d and COSY in Figure e), and then a long-range heteronuclear correlation between the ortho protons H2 and F1 in blue (and similarly between H2′ and F1′ in red – see Figure f). Together, these experiments allow us to draw the important conclusion that the 19F NMR signal of a 4-fluorobenzyl group at the N-terminus of an oligothiourea appears downfield (−116.4 ppm) of the corresponding upfield 19F NMR signal (−117.9 ppm) at the C-terminus. It is important to note that, for this molecule, the two fluorine environments are always in slow exchange (at both 298 and 278 K, Figure c). For the corresponding proton environments to move into slow exchange, it is necessary to cool the sample to 248 K (Figure b).

To validate the para-fluorobenzyl groups as probes of conformational preference, meta-fluoro, ortho-fluoro, and para-trifluoromethyl benzyl groups were also investigated (Figure ) through 19F VT NMR studies for compounds 22 (Figure b), 23 (Figure c), and 24 (Figure d). At 298 K, 24 (see Figure d) and 23 showed a single broad 19F NMR peak, while 22 showed two broad resonances. At lower temperatures (278 K), these signals decoalesced into two equally integrating signals for all of 22, 23, and 24, separated, respectively, by 3.6 ppm, 1.9 ppm, and 2.0 ppm. The equal integration of all these pairs of signals is consistent with, and most parsimoniously explained by, a single, coherent intramolecular chain of hydrogen bonds which distinguishes the chemical environments of the 19F probe at the N-terminus (adjacent to the exposed NH group, in blue) and the C-terminus (adjacent to the exposed CO group, in red). The environments of the two 19F probes move from intermediate to slow exchange as the rate of reversal of the directionality of this chain (and hence rate of dynamic exchange of N and C-termini) decreases on cooling. Although the o-F probe was more sensitive to its environment (presumably due to its proximity to the hydrogen-bond donor or acceptor), the risk of an interfering intramolecular hydrogen bond to F led us to prefer the p-F probe. 19F VT NMR analysis of 24 (Figure d) compared to 3 (Figure d) showed that the p-F probe in trimer 3 (1.7 ppm separation) was more sensitive than the p-CF3 in trimer 24 (0.3 ppm) (Figure d). In fact, it has been shown in proteins that a CF3 group is less sensitive to local electric fields and van der Waals interactions than a monofluorinated tag, resulting in a smaller chemical shift dispersion. , We therefore used p-fluorobenzyl-capped N-butyl thiourea oligomers for the remainder of this work.

6.

6

NMR study of oligothiourea foldamers 22, 23, and 24 in solution. (a) Molecular structures of 22, 23, and 24. 565 MHz 19F VT NMR spectra of (b) 22, (c) 23, and (d) 24 (8 mM) at 308, 298 and 278 K in CDCl3.

1H and 19F NMR Structural Study of 4

Unlike the simple NMR spectra of conformationally uniform 3, the 19F NMR spectra of tetramer 4 in CDCl3 at both 298 and 278 K (Figure d) reveal multiple conformers, which are in slow exchange at 278 K. These conformers must arise from rotamers that contain breaks in an otherwise coherent chain of hydrogen bonds. The occurrence of “flaws” in hydrogen-bonded foldamers has been explored in Aib-derived polyamide helices and their existence has been noted in oligourea foldamers, but quantitative analyses of the extent to which a foldamer may deviate from the ideal “specific compact conformation” are rare. Oligomer 4 therefore presents an opportunity to use structural information derived from 19F and 2D NMR experiments to explore the structure and dynamics of the variously hydrogen-bonded conformers that it populates.

Figure a shows the mechanism we propose for hydrogen-bond directionality reversal as a result of C–N bond rotations from 4a to 4a′ via intermediates 4b, 4c, and 4b′, which from here onward will also be called “broken” conformers. The degenerate conformers 4a and 4a′ have a globally coherent hydrogen-bonded chain but with opposite directionality, thus resulting in two different environments for the fluorine at either end, shown in red (at the C-terminus) and in blue (at the N-terminus). Degenerate intermediates 4b and 4b′ derived from 4a and 4a′ by the rotation of one thiourea at either end of the foldamer. We expect the fluorine nuclei of 4b and 4b′ to be characterized by different chemical shifts as one (in green) is at the N-terminus of a chain of three hydrogen-bonded thioureas, while the other one (in pink) is near only one non-hydrogen-bonded thiourea group. From these intermediates 4b and 4b′, another rotation of one of the central thioureas leads to the symmetric 4c where both fluorines (in orange) are in the same environment at the N-terminus of a chain of two hydrogen-bonded thioureas. 1H–1H ROESY NMR at 248 K (Figure b) revealed that all the upfield (and thus non-hydrogen-bonded) NH peaks of 4 (see orange shading in Figure b) showed ROEs to the butyl urea CH2 peaks around 3.60 ppm and to the benzylic CH2 peaks at 4.63 ppm (i.e., H5). No ROEs were observed between these upfield NH peaks and the ethylene-bridge CH2 peaks of the foldamer backbone (broad peak around 4.00 ppm). Conversely, the downfield NH peaks (i.e., hydrogen-bonded, see blue shading in Figure b) have a ROE cross-peak with the butyl urea CH2 peaks and ethylene-bridge CH2 signals. These observations are consistent with the existence of conformers 4a, 4a′, 4b, 4b′, and 4c, where the non-hydrogen-bonded NH points toward the p-fluorobenzyl capping groups, but not 4d, 4d′, or 4e (Figure c) with outward-orientated CS groups. Molecular mechanics calculations (see Section S5) corroborated these findings. Among the computed 50 lowest energy conformers for 4, structures corresponding to both the “globally coherent” and “broken” conformers 4a, 4b, and 4c were identified. However, even among the one hundred lowest energy structures of 4, “broken” conformers 4d and 4e could not be found.

7.

7

Structural study of oligothiourea foldamer 4. (a) Proposed mechanism for reversal of global hydrogen bond directionality in 4 through “broken” conformers 4b, 4b′, and 4c. (b) 500 MHz 1H–1H ROESY of 4 (8 mM) in CDCl3 at 248 K. An orange highlight shows that not hydrogen-bonded NHA has an exchange cross-peak with NHA′ (which is hydrogen bonded), an ROE cross-peak with H5, an ROE cross-peak with CH2 (in α to NH) of the butyl thiourea chain, and no ROE cross-peak with H5′. A blue highlight shows that hydrogen-bonded NH have exchange cross-peaks with other hydrogen-bonded NH, an exchange cross-peak with not hydrogen-bonded NHA, an ROE cross-peak with ethylene-bridge CH2, ROE cross-peaks with CH2 (in α to NH) of the butyl thiourea chain, and no ROE cross-peaks with either H5 or H5′. (c) Conformers 4d, 4d′, and 4e not detected. (d) 471 MHz 19F NMR of 4 at 298 K with assignments.

Thus, it seemed likely that 4 populated the globally coherent conformer 4a along with one or both of the “broken” conformers 4b, 4b′, and 4c in Figure d. Considering the experimental evidence from the ROESY spectrum and by analogy with the 19F NMR peaks assignment of 3, the five peaks visible in the 19F NMR spectrum of 4 at 298 K were assigned as follows. The equally integrating pair of 19F NMR peaks showing the greatest chemical shift separation was assigned to 4a and 4a′, with the N- and C-terminal fluorine nuclei (blue and red, respectively, assigned analogously to 3). Of the three remaining peaks in the 19F NMR spectrum, two of these are broad but integrate equally, and so were assigned to 4b and 4b′, in which the fluorine nuclei (in green and pink) – while both adjacent to an NH – are nonetheless in slightly different environments. The chain of three hydrogen-bonded thioureas in 4b and 4b′ likely benefits from cooperativity strengthening the intramolecular hydrogen bonds, which is lost when the thioureas are intramolecularly hydrogen bonded in two pairs, as they are in 4c. Thus, we suggest that the single sharp peak is assigned to the fluorine nuclei (orange) in the symmetrical conformer 4c in which symmetry places both fluorine probes in the same environment, and that 4c is in slow exchange with 4b and 4b′. The fact that the 19F NMR peaks for these “broken” conformers have chemical shifts closer to the signal of the blue F at the N-terminus of the globally coherent conformer is consistent with their assignment to conformers in which the fluorine nuclei lie adjacent to terminal thiourea N–H (rather than CS) bonds. This study corroborates a previous hypothesis that the global hydrogen-bond directionality inversion process in analogous oligoureas has been proposed to occur in a nonconcerted manner, with each urea unit rotating in turn. A similar phenomenon may give rise to the mixture of sharp and broad 19F NMR peaks observed for pentamer 5. It is notable that no evidence for the population of conformers other than the fully hydrogen-bonded conformer of trimer 3 was seen at the temperatures studied by 1H and 19F NMR.

Dynamic Conformation of Oligothiourea Foldamers in Membrane Mimics

Incorporation of foldamers into the membranes of liposomes could enable the development of new signal communication systems relying on a conformational change, and Aib-derived helical foldamers have already shown promise in this area. , The exploration of foldamer conformations in the membrane phase is in its infancy, with only two examples of conformational analysis being reported. , However, foldamers that have well-defined structures in both solution and in a membrane offer opportunities rarely presented by biogenic molecules to compare behavior of the same molecule in both isotropic and nonisotropic environments.

Having successfully validated 19F NMR as a means of exploring the conformation of oligothiourea foldamers in solution, we set about extending the use of the technique to the membrane phase. We initially explored small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) as a membrane environment that would both solubilize the foldamers and allow the acquisition of well-resolved spectra to study their dynamic behavior. However, a significant increase in the line width of the signal was observed for the tested pentamer foldamers, presumably due to increased rotational correlation time of the lipid vesicles , (see Section S4.9 in the Supporting Information).

We therefore tried two alternative rapidly reorienting membrane-mimetic environments suitable for high-resolution NMR studies: micelles and bicelles. Both micelles and bicelles are dynamic assemblies on the NMR time scale, undergoing rapid molecular exchange and structural fluctuations, which may contribute to the averaging of the environments experienced by the embedded foldamers.

Micelles are nanometer-scale spherical particles suspended in an aqueous solution consisting of aggregated detergent molecules with a hydrophobic core. In particular, micelles composed of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) have been extensively employed for structural characterization of membrane proteins through solution NMR techniques. − SDS micelles were prepared by suspending the detergent in MOPS (20 mM, pH 7.4), NaCl (100 mM), and KF (0.05 mM, F(aq)− was used as a reference for the 19F NMR spectra). In order to study the dynamic conformation of compounds 1–5 in micelles, an aliquot of the desired compound dissolved in 9:1 MeOD/d 6-DMSO was added to the colloidal suspension. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) of the micellar suspensions showed that their size was unchanged after incorporation of the foldamer (see Section S3.4 of the Supporting Information). The successful incorporation of reference compound 1 and foldamers 2–5 into micelles was confirmed by the observation of signals characteristic of each compound when the micellar suspensions were analyzed by 1H and 19F VT NMR spectroscopy (Figure ).

9.

9

(a) 600 MHz 1H (with presaturation for the suppression of the water signal) and (b) 565 MHz 19F NMR spectra at 318, 298 and 288 K of compounds 1–5 (1 mM) embedded in bicelles (DLPC:DHPC, 300 mM, q = 0.5) suspended in MOPS (20 mM, pH 7.4), NaCl (100 mM), KF (0.05 mM) in D2O.

Figure shows the aromatic region of the 1H NMR spectra and the 19F NMR spectra at 318, 298 and 288 K in micelles. (Cooling to 278 K led to precipitation.) Sharp signals were noted in both 1H and 19F spectra of all the investigated compounds 1–5 unless slow exchange processes were occurring. The region of the 1H NMR spectra at chemical shifts lower than 5 ppm is dominated by the residual water solvent peak and by the signals of the buffer (MOPS) and of the detergent (SDS), but suppression of the water signal by presaturation reveals the signals of aromatic protons H2,2′ and H3,3′ of the various compounds.

8.

8

(a) 600 MHz 1H (with presaturation for the suppression of the water signal) and (b) 565 MHz 19F VT NMR spectra at 318, 298 and 288 K of compounds 1–5 (1 mM) embedded in micelles (SDS, 200 mM) suspended in MOPS (20 mM, pH 7.4), NaCl (100 mM), KF (0.05 mM) in D2O.

Confounding signals from solvent and SDS may be completely eliminated by using 19F NMR spectroscopy, since only the incorporated foldamers contain fluorine atoms. Reference compound 1, in micelles between 318 and 288 K, shows two peaks with characteristic multiplicities for H3,3′ (downfield) and H2,2′ (upfield) in the 1H spectrum (Figure a) and one sharp peak in the 19F NMR (Figure b), indicating fast C–N bond rotation on the NMR time scale. In addition, the micellar environment shields the 19F nuclei of 1 by 1.9 ppm, leading to an upfield shift of the peak from −116.3 ppm in CDCl3 to −118.2 ppm in micelles.

Compound 2 in micelles exhibits in the 1H NMR spectrum (Figure a) a sharp peak for H2,2′ and a peak for H3,3′ that broadens into intermediate exchange at 288 K, and in the 19F NMR spectrum (Figure b) a sharp peak at 318 K that decoalesces in two separate peaks at 288 K. We therefore conclude that in micelles dimer 2 populates just two identical hydrogen-bonded conformations with opposite hydrogen bond directionality, having a single intramolecular hydrogen bond that persists when 2 is embedded in the micelle. The slow-exchange chemical shift difference between the two decoalesced fluorine peaks is ∼2.0 ppm in CDCl3 (at 278 K) and ∼0.4 ppm in micelles (at 288 K), suggesting more equalized environments for at the N- and C-termini once the foldamer is incorporated in micelles.

Compound 3 showed at 298 K four equally integrating peaks in the 1H spectrum for H2, H2′, H3, H3′ (Figure a, assigned by analogy with spectra in CDCl3 and CD2Cl2) and two separate equally integrating peaks in the 19F NMR (Figure b). As the temperature was raised to 318 K, the proton signals coalesced into two separate peaks while the fluorine peaks appeared broadened, demonstrating that in micelles trimer 3 exists as two degenerate equilibrating conformers with opposite hydrogen-bond directionality, which remain in slow exchange at 298 K. In this case, the difference between the chemical shifts of the N- and C-terminal F nuclei decreases from 1.8 ppm in CDCl3 (at 278 K, Figure d) to 0.4 ppm in micelles (at 288 K).

With the third intramolecular hydrogen-bond of tetramer 4, the 1H NMR spectrum (Figure a) contains four broad peaks at 288 K, which coalesce into two equally integrating signals at 318 K. The 19F NMR (Figure b) shows two peaks with different integrals at all temperatures and at 288 K also a small peak at higher chemical shifts (see arrow in Figure b). The downfield signal of the fluorine at the N-terminus integrates more than the upfield fluorine at the C-terminus similarly to 4 in CDCl3. This suggests that in micelles at 298 K, a small population of “broken” conformers, with the NH groups pointing toward the capping group, contribute to this integral, although less than in CDCl3 (integrals 1.4:1.0 in CDCl3 in Figure d versus 1.1:1.0 in micelles in Figure b at 298 K). It is clear that for 4, both in solution and in micelles, 19F NMR reveals the presence of minor conformers more readily than does 1H NMR. This increased sensitivity is particularly visible in the case of foldamer 5. In the 1H spectrum (Figure a) only the peaks corresponding to H3 and H3′ appear decoalesced at 298 K, and in the 19F spectrum multiple peaks reveal the population of both the coherent and “broken” conformers of 5 in the micellar environment.

Micelles have a monolayer structure with a high curvature, with loosely packed head-groups and tight chains entangled in the hydrophobic core. These features mean that micelles differ significantly from the biological membrane morphology. By contrast, bicelles consist of a disc-shaped phospholipid bilayer, surrounded by a rim of short-chain phospholipid molecules, and have been used for NMR studies of membrane-associated peptides and proteins. − Specifically, a mixture of 1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DLPC) and 1,2-dihexanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DHPC) with a q ratio of 0.5 mimics the phospholipid bilayer of a liposome, but on a much smaller scale than SUVs (6 nm diameter for bicelles versus about 100 nm for SUVs), which minimizes the broadening of NMR peaks.

Similar to SDS micelles, DLPC:DHPC bicelles were prepared by suspending the lipids in the same aqueous buffer, followed by the addition of an aliquot of foldamer dissolved in 9:1 MeOD/d 6-DMSO to the colloidal suspension.

Reference compound 1 and foldamers 2–5 were evidently incorporated into bicelles, as distinct signals characteristic of each compound were visible when the bicelle suspensions were analyzed by 1H and 19F NMR spectroscopy (Figure ). Analogously to Figure for micelles, Figure shows the aromatic region of the 1H NMR spectra (with the signals for H3,3′ and H2,2′) and the 19F NMR spectra at 318, 298 and 288 K of a series of foldamers in bicelles. As in CDCl3 and micelles, the signals for reference compound 1 are in fast exchange at all temperatures investigated in both the 1H and 19F NMR spectra. The decrease of the temperature from 318 to 288 K led to shielding of the fluorine peak by 1 ppm, but, unlike in micelles, the signals of H3,3′ and H2,2′ were relatively insensitive to the temperature change. Dimer 2 showed two broad peaks (especially for H3,3′) in the 1H NMR spectrum at 288 K (intermediate exchange) that sharpened at 318 K (fast exchange), and likewise a broad fluorine peak that moved from intermediate at 288 K to fast exchange at 318 K. Bicelle suspensions incorporating the foldamers did not precipitate at 278 K, so it was possible to cool all the samples to lower temperatures. In the case of 2, this revealed the decoalescence of both the H3,3′ signal in the 1H NMR and the fluorine signal in the 19F NMR into two equally integrating peaks. Being able to identify the two signals in slow exchange confirms that, as in micelles, two interconverting degenerate conformers of 2 are present in bicelles, with an intact intramolecular hydrogen bond. The addition of a second intramolecular hydrogen bond in trimer 3 further slows down the directionality interconversion, as even at 298 K, it is possible to observe four peaks in the 1H NMR spectrum for the aromatic protons and two peaks in the 19F NMR. The comparison of the 19F NMR spectra of 3 in CDCl3 at 278 K (Figure d), in micelles at 288 K (Figure b) and in bicelles at 288 K (Figure b) reveals that the chemical shift difference between the two fluorine peaks, and thus between the F environments at the C- and N-termini, is even smaller in bicelles (0.1 ppm).

The 1H NMR of 4 suggested that at 288 K two identical “coherent” conformers are populated, since both H3,3′ and H2,2′ are in slow exchange and transition to intermediate exchange at 318 K. However, VT NMR of tetramer 4 in both CDCl3 and micelles showed additionally the presence of “broken” conformers. In the bicelle, 19F NMR reveals a spectrum in which the two 19F NMR peaks integrate identically, i.e., 1.0:1.0, at 298 K, suggesting that in bicelles the “broken” conformers of 4 cannot be detected at this temperature, possibly due to the small difference in chemical shifts between the two F peaks (only 0.2 ppm at 298 K). Pentamer 5 exhibits broad peaks in both the 1H and 19F NMR spectra at 288 K that sharpen as the temperature increases to 318 K. Unlike for 4, “broken” conformers of 5 can be detected in bicelles, as the F peak at 298 K appears to be a broad combination of multiple overlapping signals. For trimer 24, at 288 K, all the aromatic protons and the fluorine are in slow exchange but move to fast exchange at 318 K, confirming the presence of two conformers. The separation of the two F peaks at 288 K is 0.1 ppm, which is comparable to that of 3 in bicelles.

In the case of dimer 2, VT NMR studies showed that it is possible to detect the two conformers with opposite hydrogen-bond directionality in both the fast and in the slow exchange regime not only in solution but also in membrane mimics. This compound was chosen as a case study to determine the barriers to the interconversion of the two conformers in CD2Cl2, micelles and bicelles (Figure ). Lineshape analysis of the 19F VT NMR spectra of 2 in different media (see Section S4.6) allowed us to determine the following free Gibbs energy ΔG298K‡ values associated with the hydrogen-bond polarity reversal: 51.5 kJ mol–1 in CD2Cl2, 56.7 kJ mol–1 in micelles and 55.9 kJ mol–1 in bicelles. Colloidal particles exhibit temperature-dependent dynamics, with acyl chain packing and disorder influencing molecular mobility. However, the small differences in ΔG298K‡ observed between solution, micelles and bicelles suggest that in the membrane environments the effect is modest. This is consistent with the dynamic nature of SDS micelles and the fluid DLPC:DHPC bicelles in which strong packing effects are less pronounced than in extended bilayers. We believe this to be the first use of dynamic NMR to evaluate the energetics of conformational interconversion of a synthetic molecule in a membrane environment. For amide-like C–N bonds, the barrier of rotation increases with increasing solvent polarity. However, we have previously shown that for a foldamer containing two intramolecularly hydrogen-bonded ureas, the addition of a polar solvent to CD2Cl2 resulted in a decrease of the rotation barrier, presumably due to hydrogen bonding to these more polar solvents reducing the enthalpic cost of breaking an intramolecular hydrogen bond to switch the directionality. Therefore, we hypothesize that the membrane-mimetic environments in the micelles and the bicelles where the compounds are embedded are less polar than CD2Cl2, which is also supported by the shielding of the fluorine signals. However, these environments are highly inhomogeneous systems in which polarity varies with depth, and molecules may adopt interfacial or partially inserted states rather than residing in the bilayer center.

10.

10

Conformational dynamics of 2. (a) Gibbs free energy ΔG298K‡ for C–N bond rotation determined through line shape fitting of the 19F VT NMR spectra of 2 in (b) CD2Cl2, (c) micelles (SDS, 200 mM) and (d) bicelles (DLPC:DHPC, 300 mM, q = 0.5). Both micelles and bicelles were suspended in MOPS (20 mM, pH 7.4), NaCl (100 mM), KF (0.05 mM) in D2O.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have reported a family of ethylene-bridge oligothiourea foldamers whose structure contains a single intramolecular sequence of N–H···SC hydrogen bonds. The high rotational barrier around the thiourea C–N bond (relative to the corresponding urea) and the strong intramolecular H-bonds allow the two degenerate, fully hydrogen-bonded conformers for foldamers 2–5 to be detected above 278 K by NMR spectroscopy. In the longer oligomers 4 and 5, additional “broken” conformers, arising from stepwise breaks in the chain of hydrogen bonds during polarity reversal, were observed and characterized for the first time. 19F NMR probes proved especially powerful in revealing these conformational features in solution and were likewise applicable to the study of the foldamers embedded into membrane mimics.

Comparison across solution, micelles, and bicelles reveals clear differences in conformational behavior. In a chloroform solution, the hydrogen-bonded chain is well-defined, but conformational heterogeneity increases with oligomer length. Trimer 3 populates almost exclusively the two fully coherent degenerate conformers, while tetramer 4 and pentamer 5 additionally populate “broken” intermediates. The 19F chemical shift separation between the N- and C-terminal probes is largest in solution, reflecting strongly differentiated terminal environments and pronounced hydrogen-bond polarity.

In SDS micelles, the foldamers are incorporated within an apolar membrane-mimetic region and retain an intact hydrogen-bond network. The same two degenerate conformers are observed for shorter oligomers, and minor broken conformers remain detectable for 4 and 5. However, the chemical shift separation between terminal fluorine probes is significantly reduced compared to solution, indicating similar N- and C-terminal environments within the curved micellar assembly. Although conformational exchange remains accessible on the NMR time scale, the “broken” intermediates are less populated than in organic solvent.

In DLPC:DHPC bicelles, which more closely resemble a phospholipid bilayer, the terminal environments become even more similar. The 19F chemical shift differences between N- and C-termini are further compressed, and for tetramer 4 the “broken” conformers are no longer readily distinguishable at 298 K, although they remain detectable for pentamer 5. Thus, while the hydrogen-bonded chain remains resilient and directionally reversible, conformational heterogeneity and the spectroscopic visibility of intermediates decrease progressively from solution to micelles to bicelles.

Dynamic NMR analysis of dimer 2 further demonstrated that hydrogen-bond polarity reversal occurs with comparable but slightly higher rotational barriers in micelles and bicelles than in an organic solvent, consistent with incorporation into a less polar membrane-mimetic environment. This study therefore establishes that these oligothiourea foldamers retain their directional hydrogen-bond networks and dynamic switching behavior not only in solution but also within membrane-mimetic systems.

This work provides the first instance in which bicelles have been used to incorporate a synthetic, non-biological molecule to enable quantitative analysis of its dynamic conformational behavior by NMR spectroscopy. The ability to monitor hydrogen-bond resilience, directionality, and intermediate populations in both isotropic and membrane-mimetic environments will be crucial for the development of synthetic communication systems that exploit hydrogen-bond polarity to transmit signals across lipid bilayers.

Supplementary Material

ja6c05314_si_001.pdf (6.9MB, pdf)

Glossary

Abbreviations

DHPC

1,2-dihexanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine

DLPC

1,2-dilauroyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine

DLS

dynamic light scattering

DOPC

1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine

MOPS

3-(N-morpholino)­propanesulfonic acid

NMR

nuclear magnetic resonance

ROESY

rotating frame overhauser enhancement spectroscopy

SDS

sodium dodecyl sulfate

SUVs

small unilamellar vesicles

VT

variable temperature

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.6c05314.

  • Materials and Methods, detailed synthetic procedures, NMR experiments, computational study (PDF)

†.

L.T. and K.S.F. contributed equally to this work. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

This work was funded by the European Research Council (Advanced Grant DOGMATRON AdG-883786) and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (grants BB/V019163/1 and BB/W008823/1).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Schlessinger J.. Cell Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases. Cell. 2000;103(2):211–225. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00114-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Simon M. I., Strathmann M. P., Gautam N.. Diversity of G Proteins in Signal Transduction. Science. 1991;252(5007):802–808. doi: 10.1126/science.1902986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brioche J., Pike S. J., Tshepelevitsh S., Leito I., Morris G. A., Webb S. J., Clayden J.. Conformational Switching of a Foldamer in a Multicomponent System by pH-Filtered Selection between Competing Noncovalent Interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137(20):6680–6691. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Morris D. T. J., Wales S. M., Tilly D. P., Farrar E. H. E., Grayson M. N., Ward J. W., Clayden J.. A molecular communication channel consisting of a single reversible chain of hydrogen bonds in a conformationally flexible oligomer. Chem. 2021;7(9):2460–2472. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2021.06.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Martínez-Crespo L., Vitórica-Yrezábal I. J., Whitehead G. F. S., Webb S. J.. A General Light-Driven Organocatalytic Platform for the Activation of Inert Substrates. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023;62(32):e202307841. doi: 10.1002/anie.202306364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Le Bailly B. A. F., Clayden J.. Dynamic foldamer chemistry. Chem. Commun. 2016;52(27):4852–4863. doi: 10.1039/C6CC00788K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Pollastrini M., Marafon G., Clayden J., Moretto A.. Light-mediated control of activity in a photosensitive foldamer that mimics an esterase. Chem. Commun. 2021;57(18):2269–2272. doi: 10.1039/D0CC08309G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. De Poli M., Zawodny W., Quinonero O., Lorch M., Webb S. J., Clayden J.. Conformational photoswitching of a synthetic peptide foldamer bound within a phospholipid bilayer. Science. 2016;352(6285):575–580. doi: 10.1126/science.aad8352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Mazzier D., Crisma M., De Poli M., Marafon G., Peggion C., Clayden J., Moretto A.. Helical Foldamers Incorporating Photoswitchable Residues for Light-Mediated Modulation of Conformational Preference. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138(25):8007–8018. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b04435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lister F. G. A., Le Bailly B. A. F., Webb S. J., Clayden J.. Ligand-modulated conformational switching in a fully synthetic membrane-bound receptor. Nat. Chem. 2017;9:420–425. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2736. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang S., della Sala F., Cliff M. J., Whitehead G. F. S., Vitórica-Yrezábal I. J., Webb S. J.. A Chiral 19F NMR Reporter of Foldamer Conformation in Bilayers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(47):21648–21657. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c09103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Doerner B., della Sala F., Wang S., Webb S. J.. Reaction, Recognition, Relay: Anyhydride Hydrolysis Reported by Conformationally Responsive Fluorinated Foldamers in Micelles. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2024;63(30):e202405924. doi: 10.1002/anie.202405924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mati I. K., Adam C., Cockroft S. L.. Seeing through solvent effects using molecular balances. Chem. Sci. 2013;4(10):3965–3972. doi: 10.1039/c3sc51764k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu Z., Zhao Y.. 19F-labeled molecular probes for NMR-based detection. J. Fluorine Chem. 2023;266:110089. doi: 10.1016/j.jfluchem.2023.110089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Wu W. G., Dowd S. R., Simplaceanu V., Peng Z. Y., Ho C.. Fluorine-19 NMR investigation of molecular motion and packing in sonicated phospholipid vesicles. Biochemistry. 1985;24(25):7153–7161. doi: 10.1021/bi00346a020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Buer B. C., Chugh J., Al-Hashimi H. M., Marsh E. N. G.. Using Fluorine Nuclear Magnetic Resonance To Probe the Interaction of Membrane-Active Peptides with the Lipid Bilayer. Biochemistry. 2010;49(27):5760–5765. doi: 10.1021/bi100605e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Horst R., Liu J. J., Stevens R. C., Wüthrich K.. β2-Adrenergic Receptor Activation by Agonists Studied with 19F NMR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013;52(41):10762–10765. doi: 10.1002/anie.201305286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu J. J., Horst R., Katritch V., Stevens R. C., Wüthrich K.. Biased Signaling Pathways in β2-Adrenergic Receptor Characterized by 19F-NMR. Science. 2012;335(6072):1106–1110. doi: 10.1126/science.1215802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wechsel R., Žabka M., Ward J. W., Clayden J.. Competing Hydrogen-Bond Polarities in a Dynamic Oligourea Foldamer: A Molecular Spring Torsion Balance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140(10):3528–3531. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b00567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Wechsel R., Raftery J., Cavagnat D., Guichard G., Clayden J.. The meso Helix: Symmetry and Symmetry-Breaking in Dynamic Oligourea Foldamers with Reversible Hydrogen-Bond Polarity. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016;55(33):9657–9661. doi: 10.1002/anie.201604496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Tilly D. P., Heeb J.-P., Webb S. J., Clayden J.. Switching imidazole reactivity by dynamic control of tautomer state in allosteric foldamer. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):2647. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-38339-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wales S. M., Morris D. T. J., Clayden J.. Reversible Capture and Release of a Ligand Mediated by a Long-Range Relayed Polarity Switch in a Urea Oligomer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:2841–2846. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c11928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Danielson M. A., Falke J. J.. Use of 19F NMR to Probe Protein Structure and Conformational Changes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1996;25:163–195. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bb.25.060196.001115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Haushalter K. A., Lau J., Roberts J. D.. An NMR Investigation of the Effect of Hydrogen Bonding on the Rates of Rotation about the C–N Bonds in Urea and Thiourea. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996;118(37):8891–8896. doi: 10.1021/ja961380k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rohlfing C. M., Allen L. C., Ditchfiel R.. Proton chemical shift tensors in hydrogen-bonded dimers of RCOOH and ROH. J. Chem. Phys. 1983;79(10):4958–4966. doi: 10.1063/1.445589. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yadav, L. D. S. Organic Spectroscopy; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2005; p 151. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hanna F. E., Root A. J., Hunter C. A.. Polarisation effects on the H-bond acceptor properties of secondary amides. Chem. Sci. 2023;14(40):11151–11157. doi: 10.1039/D3SC03823H. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kazim M., Siegler M. A., Lectka T.. Close Amide NH···F Hydrogen Bonding Interactions in 1,8-Disubstituted Naphthalenes. J. Org. Chem. 2020;85(9):6195–6200. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.0c00553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Huang Y., Reddy K. D., Bracken C., Biao Q., Zhan W., Eliezer D., Boudker O.. Environmentally Ultrasensitive Fluorine Probe to Resolve Protein Conformational Ensembles by 19F NMR and Cryo-EM. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145(15):8583–8592. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c01003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Frere G. A., Hasabnis A., Francisco C. B., Suleiman M., Alimowska O., Rahmatullah R., Gould J., Su C. Y.-C., Voznyy O., Gunning P. T., Basso E. A., Prosser R. S.. Next-Generation Tags for Fluorine Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Designing Amplification of Chemical Shift Sensitivity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024;146(5):3052–3064. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c09730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Le Bailly B. A. F., Byrne L., Diemer V., Foroozandeh M., Morris G. A., Clayden J.. Flaws in foldamers: conformational uniformity and signal decay in achiral helical peptide oligomers. Chem. Sci. 2015;6(4):2313–2322. doi: 10.1039/C4SC03944K. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Gellman S. H.. Foldamers: A Manifesto. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998;31(4):173–180. doi: 10.1021/ar960298r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Trevisan L., Bond A. D., Hunter C. A.. Quantitative Measurement of Cooperativity in H-Bonded Networks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144(42):19499–19507. doi: 10.1021/jacs.2c08120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Keeler, J. Understanding NMR Spectroscopy, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, 2010; pp 257–258. [Google Scholar]
  35. Serrano-Sanchez A., Rice M., Cassar J., White L. J., Popoola P. I. A., Thompson G. S., Hiscock J. R., Ortega-Roldan J. L.. A solution NMR methodology enabling the elucidation of small molecule phospholipid membrane adhesion and passive permeation parameters. Chem. Commun. 2024;60(79):11160–11163. doi: 10.1039/D4CC01515K. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sanders C. R., Sönnichsen F.. Solution NMR of membrane proteins: practice and challenges. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2006;44:S24–S40. doi: 10.1002/mrc.1816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Blume A.. A comparative study of the phase transitions of phospholipid bilayers and monolayers. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1979;557:32–44. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(79)90087-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hartley G. S.. Ioneaggregation in Lösungen von Salzen mit langen Paraffinketten. Kolloid-Z. 1939;88:22–40. doi: 10.1007/BF01518886. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Privé G. G.. Detergents for the stabilization and crystallization of membrane proteins. Methods. 2007;41(4):388–397. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2007.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang Q., Horst R., Geralt M., Ma X., Hong W., Finn M. G., Stevens R. C., Wüthrich K.. Microscale NMR Screening of New Detergents for Membrane Protein Structural Biology. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130(23):7357–7363. doi: 10.1021/ja077863d. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Tulumello D. V., Deber C. M.. SDS Micelle as a Membrane-Mimetic Environment for Transmembrane Segments. Biochemistry. 2009;48(51):12096–12103. doi: 10.1021/bi9013819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hoult D. I.. Solvent Peak Saturation with Single Phase and Quadrature Fourier Transformation. J. Magn. Reson. 1976;21(2):337–347. doi: 10.1016/0022-2364(76)90081-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dürr U. H. N., Gildenberg M., Ramamoorthy A.. The Magic of Bicelles Lights Up Membrane Protein Structure. Chem. Rev. 2012;112(11):6054–6074. doi: 10.1021/cr300061w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sanders C. R. II, Prestegard J. H.. Magnetically orientable phospholipid bilayers containing small amounts of a bile salt analogue, CHAPSO. Biophys. J. 1990;58(2):447–460. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82390-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Ram P., Prestegard J. H.. Magnetic field induced ordering of bile salt/phospholipid micelles: new media for NMR structural investigations. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1988;940(2):289–294. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(88)90203-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Vold R. R., Prosser R. S.. Magnetically Oriented Phospholipid Bilayered Micelles for Structural Studies of Polypeptides. Does the Ideal Bicelle Exist? J. Magn. Reson., Ser. B. 1996;113(3):267–271. doi: 10.1006/jmrb.1996.0187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Björnerås J., Nilsson M., Mäler L.. Analysing DHPC/DMPC bicelles by diffusion NMR and multivariate decomposition. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2015;1848(11):2910–2917. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Sharma V. K., Mitra S., Verma G., Hassan P. A., Garcia Sakai V., Mukhopadhyay R.. Internal Dynamics in SDS Micelles: Neutron Scattering Study. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2010;114:17049–17056. doi: 10.1021/jp108274y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Amalla B. L. D., Kumeta H., Nagao S., Ishimori K.. Dynamic properties of isotropic DMPC/DHPC bicelles: Insights from solution NMR and MD simulations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2025;745:151199. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.151199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Cox C., Lectka T.. Solvent effects on the barrier to rotation in carbamates. J. Org. Chem. 1998;63:2426–2427. doi: 10.1021/jo9800863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Arrais D., Martins J.. Bilayer polarity and its thermal dependency in the lo and ld phases of binary phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol mixtures. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 2007;1768:2914–2922. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. White S. H., Wimley W. C.. Hydrophobic interactions of peptides with membrane interfaces. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Rev. Biomembr. 1998;1376:339–352. doi: 10.1016/S0304-4157(98)00021-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ja6c05314_si_001.pdf (6.9MB, pdf)

Articles from Journal of the American Chemical Society are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES