Abstract
Vaccination is an important control measure against infections with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyopneumoniae), the primary pathogen of enzootic pneumonia in pigs. The present study investigated local and systemic humoral and cell-mediated immune responses and efficacy upon vaccination of piglets with a combined vaccine containing inactivated M. hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus 2d (Cirbloc® M Hyo, Ceva), followed by experimental M. hyopneumoniae infection (D21). Forty-five piglets were allocated to three groups, namely the not-vaccinated and infected (C) (n = 20), vaccinated and infected (V) (n = 20), and not-vaccinated and not-infected (NC) groups (n = 5). Vaccination was applied once (D0) intramuscularly. Four pigs from the V and C groups were euthanized 2 weeks post-infection (D35), and the remaining pigs 2 weeks later (D49). Blood, lung tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and bronchial lymph nodes were collected at different timepoints. Piglets in the V group exhibited seroconversion on days 21 and 35, with markedly elevated levels of specific IgA and IgG in BALF on D35. Furthermore, the V group showed activation of interferon (IFN)-γ+/tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α+ CD4+CD8α+ T cells and T cell proliferation on day 7, with these responses remaining elevated through D21. The concentrations of interleukin (IL)-1β, TNF-α, C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 8 (CXCL-8), and IL-17A in BALF of the C group were higher on D49, correlating with higher M. hyopneumoniae DNA loads. Clinical signs and lung lesions were less severe in vaccinated pigs. The combined vaccine elicited robust M. hyopneumoniae-specific humoral and cellular responses in blood and enhanced post-infection cellular immunity in draining lymph nodes, underscoring its protective efficacy.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13567-026-01808-9.
Keywords: Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, combination vaccine, experimental study, humoral immunity, cell-mediated immunity
Introduction
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyopneumoniae) is the etiological agent of enzootic pneumonia, a chronic respiratory disease in pigs, and an important pathogen in the porcine respiratory disease complex [1]. The pathogen is widespread in the global pig industry and is responsible for significant economic losses [2]. Pigs of all ages can be infected, but most clinical signs occur in grow-finishing pigs [3]. Clinical manifestations include chronic coughing, growth retardation, and lower feed efficiency [1]. Pigs infected with M. hyopneumoniae are more susceptible to other respiratory infections [4] and require more antimicrobials for treatment.
Vaccination is an important tool to control M. hyopneumoniae infections. It is used worldwide to minimize performance losses, clinical signs, lung lesions, and treatment costs. Unfortunately, the current vaccines only provide partial protection and do not prevent colonization and transmission [5–8]. Also, the efficacy of combined vaccines against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and other pathogens has been assessed under both field and experimental conditions. Field studies have mainly assessed ready-to-use bivalent vaccines containing porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and M. hyopneumoniae. For example, Nielsen et al. reported improved production performance in Danish pig herds following vaccination on the basis of historical comparisons. Similarly, Tzika et al. and Ham et al. demonstrated that bivalent vaccination under field conditions effectively reduced disease impact and improved herd health status [6, 7, 9]. Under experimental conditions, Krejci et al. evaluated a PCV-2d and M. hyopneumoniae vaccine using challenge models with different PCV-2 genotypes and showed that vaccination reduced viral DNA levels in serum and provided early and sustained protection [10]. More recently, multivalent vaccines have been investigated. Allen et al. and Suh et al. evaluated trivalent vaccines by examining pathogen burden, lung lesion severity, and safety [8, 11]. These studies demonstrated the potential of combined vaccines in controlling porcine respiratory pathogens. However, these studies with the combined vaccines did not perform comprehensive investigations into the protective humoral and cellular immunity.
Efforts to improve the efficacy of M. hyopneumoniae vaccines rely on elucidating the immune responses upon vaccination and subsequent infection [12]. Inactivated M. hyopneumoniae vaccines usually induce seroconversion in pigs, pointing to a humoral immune response [13]. However, serum antibodies are not correlated with protection, and cell-mediated immunity is considered more important for protection. Colonization of the respiratory tract by M. hyopneumoniae leads to the secretion of various cytokines, which subsequently drive a robust inflammatory response [14, 15]. Although these responses may be associated with protection, the massive infiltration of lymphohistiocytic cells in the lung tissue upon infection is considered as being part of the pathogenesis and involved in the pulmonary lesions [16]. Our research group previously observed that, in vaccinated animals infected with M. hyopneumoniae, concentrations of the pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)−1β and IL-6 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were lower than in unvaccinated infected animals, while levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 were higher [17]. We also showed that M. hyopneumoniae vaccination may mitigate inflammatory responses by reducing IL-17A expression after infection [17, 18]. Expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines correlates positively with the severity of pulmonary tissue pathology, while the upregulation of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 may suppress ongoing inflammatory responses and also facilitate the establishment of chronic infection [19]. The relationship between these cytokines and protective or inflammatory mechanisms remains as yet unclear.
T-cell-mediated immune responses are generally considered crucial for defense against Mycoplasma species causing local respiratory infections, such as M. hyopneumoniae [17, 20]. Previous studies have demonstrated that vaccination against M. hyopneumoniae increases the proportion of CD4+CD8α+ T cells producing tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and TNF-α+/interferon (IFN)-γ+ in peripheral blood. In addition, the proportion of TNF-α+ CD8α+ T cells is markedly elevated, accompanied by substantially enhanced T cell proliferation after vaccination [17, 21]. These studies primarily assessed cellular immune responses using peripheral blood samples only. While informative, this approach provides a limited view on vaccine-induced immunity. A more comprehensive evaluation of cellular immune responses at both systemic and local levels, particularly in tissues directly involved in M. hyopneumoniae infection is needed, as well as longitudinal cellular immune monitoring and evaluation of local respiratory immune responses [8, 22].
The present study investigated the local and systemic immune responses of a new inactivated M. hyopneumoniae vaccine (strain 2940) that is combined with porcine circovirus type 2 d (ORF2 capsid protein) at different time points in pigs that were subsequently experimentally infected with M. hyopneumoniae. The pigs were monitored throughout the study and necropsied at 2 and 4 weeks after infection.
Materials and methods
Animals
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and the Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University (EC 2024-023).
Piglets (45; 23 males and 22 females; Naima × Piétrain) were selected from a herd with a confirmed M. hyopneumoniae-free status. The farm had been consistently verified as M. hyopneumoniae-free over recent years through a combination of serological testing, absence of clinical signs, tracheal swab analysis using nested polymerase chain reaction (nPCR), and evaluation of lung lesions. Before the initiation of the study, 40 tracheobronchial swabs were obtained from pigs of varying age groups (including weaned piglets and fattening pigs) and tested for M. hyopneumoniae DNA using a quantitative Real-Time TaqMan PCR (qPCR) assay. All samples tested negative. Additionally, the farm was free of other major respiratory pathogens, including porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Two animals died during or shortly after the challenge infection. These two piglets were excluded from the analyses performed after challenge. Three pigs (two piglets were from the V group and one piglet was from the C group) developed mild diarrhea and lameness between D7 and D16 and were treated with amoxicillin (Duphamox® LA, Covetrus, Belgium) and an anti-inflammatory drug (Melovem®, Covetrus, Belgium) for 3–5 days.
Experimental design
The experimental design and an overview of the collected samples are presented in Figure 1. Piglets were weaned at 18 days of age and subsequently transported from the source herd to the research facilities of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at Ghent University. Upon arrival, the animals were randomly allocated to three experimental groups and underwent a 6-day acclimatization period. These three groups included a not-vaccinated and infected group (C) (n = 20), a vaccinated and infected group (V) (n = 20), and a not-vaccinated and not-infected (NC) group (n = 5). Stratified randomization was performed with consideration of body weight (to ensure comparable starting weights across groups) and sex distribution. All animals had ad libitum access to drinking water and were fed a commercial, antimicrobial-free diet.
Figure 1.
Overview of the experimental design. D-6: arrival of piglets in experimental facilities; D0: vaccination; D7: 1 week after vaccination; D21: experimental infection; D35: necropsy of four animals in the V and in the C group; D49: necropsy of the remaining animals. Piglets (n = 45) were divided into three groups. Twenty piglets were vaccinated on D0 (V) and challenged with M. hyo after 3 weeks (D21), 20 piglets were not vaccinated but challenged (C), the remaining 5 piglets served as the negative control (NC); Eight pigs (4 from the V and 4 from the C groups) were euthanized 2 weeks after challenge (D35), the remaining ones were euthanized at D49. Blood was collected on D0, D7, D21, D35, and D49. BALF was collected on D7, D35, and D49. Lung tissue and bronchial lymph nodes (BLN) were collected at necropsy day (D35 and D49).
The piglets from the C, V, and NC groups were initially housed together in five separate units (nine animals per unit) until challenge-infection (D21). From then onward, the pigs of the NC group (n = 5) were housed in a separate unit, while pigs from the C and V groups were mixed across the five units.
At 24 days of age (D0), piglets in the V group (n = 20) received an intramuscular injection of 2 mL of a combined vaccine containing inactivated M. hyopneumoniae and inactivated Porcine Circovirus type 2 d (Cirbloc® M hyo, Ceva Animal Health). Piglets in the C (n = 20) and NC (n = 5) groups were administered 2 mL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) via intramuscular injection. Three weeks post-vaccination, at 45 days of age (D21), piglets in the C and V groups were challenge-infected via endotracheal inoculation with 7 mL of an inoculum containing 107 color-changing units (CCU)/mL of the highly virulent M. hyopneumoniae strain F7.2C, followed by inoculation with the low-virulent strain F1.12A the next day [18]. Piglets in the NC group received a similar inoculation protocol using 7 mL of sterile modified Friis culture medium. For all inoculations and BALF sample collection, animals were anesthetized via intramuscular injection with 0.11 mL/kg of a mixture containing zolazepam and tiletamine (Zoletil 100®, Virbac, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) and xylazine (Xyl-M® 2%, VMD, Arendonk, Belgium), corresponding to doses of 2.2 mg/kg xylazine and 4.4 mg/kg Zoletil. Four pigs of the C and four pigs of the V group were necropsied on D35. The remaining pigs were necropsied at D49.
Sample collection
Blood samples were collected via jugular vein puncture at multiple time points: D0 (vaccination day), D7 (1 week after vaccination), D21 (challenge day), D35 (2 weeks after challenge), and D49 (4 weeks after challenge). Serum was separated and stored at −20 °C until further analysis. Additionally, non-clotted blood was collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-coated vacutainer tubes and used immediately to assess cell-mediated immune responses.
BALF was collected on D7, D35, and D49 using a plastic pipette attached to an automatic pipettor inserted into the trachea. The lungs were flushed with 20 mL of sterile PBS as described previously [17, 18]. At necropsy, BALF was obtained by flushing the main bronchus of the right lung lobe with 20 mL sterile PBS as described [23]. The BALF samples were stored at −80 °C until further analysis.
Clinical and performance parameters
Throughout the study, all animals were monitored daily for a minimum of 20 min by the principal investigator during morning hours (08:00–10:00 AM). During these observations, clinical assessments were conducted. These included the evaluation of coughing severity using the Respiratory Disease Score (RDS) [24] as well as documentation of other clinical signs such as reduced appetite, diarrhea, dyspnea, depression, and lameness. The RDS could range from 0 to 6, with the following criteria: score 0 means normal (no coughing), score 1 means mild coughing after stimulated exercise, score 2 means mild coughing at rest, score 3 means moderate coughing after stimulated exercise, score 4 means moderate coughing at rest, score 5 means severe coughing after stimulated exercise, and score 6 means severe coughing at rest.
Macroscopic and microscopic lung lesions
At necropsy (D35/D49), the lungs were removed and evaluated for macroscopic Mycoplasma-like lesions using a scoring method as described [24]. The lesion score for each lung ranged from 0 (no Mycoplasma-like lesions) to 35 (entire lung affected).
Additionally, tissue samples were collected from the top of the left apical, cardiac, and diaphragmatic lobes for histopathological analysis. These samples were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin and subsequently embedded in paraffin before being stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Microscopic examination was performed using a Nanozoomer NDP slide scanner (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) with the associated NDP.View2 platform. The degree of peribronchiolar and perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltration and nodule formation (cuffing) was assessed in ten random microscopic fields (at 40× magnification) from each sample, following a previously described scoring system [25]. The lesion severity score ranged from 1 to 5, with the following classifications: score 1 means limited infiltration of macrophages and lymphocytes around bronchioles, with no cellular exudates in the airways and alveolar spaces; score 2 means mild to moderate infiltrates with diffuse cellular exudates into the airways; score 3–5 means lesions characteristic of broncho-interstitial pneumonia, with severity increasing from mild to severe. These lesions are centered around the bronchioles and extend into the interstitium, characterized by lymph follicular infiltration and mixed inflammatory cell exudates. Scores 3, 4, and 5 were considered indicative of infection with M. hyopneumoniae. All these analyses were performed in a blinded manner.
Quantitative PCR for M. hyopneumoniae DNA in BALF
A commercial kit (DNeasy® Blood & Tissue kit, Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) was used to extract DNA from the BALF samples. Then, a quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed to measure the M. hyopneumoniae DNA load as described previously [26]. Briefly, 1 µL DNA sample was mixed with iQ Supermix (5 µL), nuclease-free water (2.7 µL), forward primer (20 µM, 0.5 µL), reverse primer (20 µM, 0.5 µL), and a probe (10 µM, 0.3 µL) in a total volume of 10 µL for DNA analysis. The threshold values were converted to the number of organisms using a tenfold dilution series of M. hyopneumoniae F7.2C DNA. Samples were considered negative if the values were below the highest dilution (1.50 × 101/mL; 1.18 log copies/mL). The M. hyopneumoniae load was expressed as log10 genome copies/µL.
M. hyopneumoniae-specific antibody responses in serum and BALF
The number of M. hyopneumoniae seropositive animals was determined using a commercial blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; IDEIA™ Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae EIA kit, Oxoid Limited, Hampshire, UK), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples with optical density (OD) lower than 50% of the average OD of the buffer control were considered positive, while those with OD higher than 50% of the average OD of the buffer control were considered negative.
M. hyopneumoniae-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and immunoglobulin A (IgA) were measured in both serum (diluted 1:200 for IgG and 1:10 for IgA) and BALF (diluted 1:10 for both) using an in-house indirect ELISA with Tween 20-extracted M. hyopneumoniae antigens [27]. All samples were tested in duplicate. If the OD difference between the duplicates exceeded 0.05 or represented more than 25% of the OD value, the samples were retested. Samples were considered positive for both BALF and serum if their average OD value was greater than the cutoff, which was calculated as the average OD of the NC group plus three times the standard deviation (SD) of the group [4].
Cytokines in BALF
The concentrations of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)−1β, IL-6, IL-10, and the chemokine CXCL-8 in BALF were quantified using a multiplex immunoassay (Custom Porcine Procarta Plex Multiplex Immunoassay, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. BALF samples were diluted at a ratio of 1:2 prior to analysis. Data analysis was performed as described previously [17].
The concentration of IL-17A in BALF was measured using a commercially available ELISA kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. BALF samples were diluted at a ratio of 1:2 prior to analysis. The OD was measured at 450 nm using a microtiter plate reader (Multiskan GO, ThermoFisher Scientific).
T cell assays
To assess cytokine production by T cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated and collected in blood samples taken at different time points, namely D0, D7, D21, D35, and D49. Lymphocytes were also collected from bronchial lymph nodes at euthanasia on D35 and D49. The cells were subsequently stimulated and stained for surface markers and intracellular cytokines as described [4, 18]. Briefly, 2.5 × 106 cells were seeded in 24-well plates and stimulated for 20 h with 3.125 × 107 CCU of inactivated M. hyopneumoniae strain F7.2C in 0.5 mL of AIM-V medium (Gibco™, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Stimulation with concanavalin A (10 µg/mL; Sigma-Aldrich) served as a positive control, while AIM-V medium alone was used as a negative control. To investigate cytokine production, protein secretion was inhibited by adding 1 µL Brefeldin A (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) for the last 4 h of stimulation. Following stimulation, cells were collected, incubated with a LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Aqua Dead Cell Stain Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) and surface stained using anti-CD3 DyLight755 (clone PPT3, in house), anti-CD4 (clone 74-12-4, in house), and anti-CD8α (clone 11–295-33, in house) mAbs, along with their corresponding secondary antibodies: anti-mouse IgG2b fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) and anti-mouse IgG2a PE-Cy7 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). For intracellular cytokine detection, cells were fixed and permeabilized (BD Fix/Perm, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and then stained with anti-human TNF-α AlexaFluor 647 (clone Mab11; BioLegend), anti-porcine IFN-γ PerCP-Cy5.5 (clone P2G10; BD Pharmingen™, Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), and anti-human IL-17A PE (clone SCPL1362; BD Pharmingen™). Samples were acquired using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using CytExpert software (Beckman Coulter). The gating strategy was identical to that described previously and is shown in Additional file 4 [17].
In addition to cytokine profiling, cell proliferation was evaluated using a previously established protocol with minor modifications [4]. PBMCs and bronchial lymph node cells were labeled using a Cell Trace™ Cell Proliferation Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Labeled cells (1 × 106/well) were seeded in 24-well plates in 0.5 mL cell culture medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM), 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% non-essential amino acids) and stimulated for 87 h with 3.125 × 107 CCU of the inactivated M. hyopneumoniae F7.2C strain. Concanavalin A (10 µg/mL) served as a positive control, while culture medium was used as a negative control to account for background proliferation. Upon stimulation, cells were collected and stained to detect CD3, CD4, and CD8α surface expression as described [4]. Propidium iodide staining was performed to exclude dead cells. The gating hierarchy was as described previously and is shown in Additional file 4 [4]. A minimum of 1000000 events were recorded for the intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay, and 500000 events were recorded for the proliferation assay.
Immunohistochemistry of lung tissue
Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) for IgA was performed in the lung tissue of pigs necropsied on D35 and D49. Paraffin-embedded lung samples were cut into 5-µm sections and mounted on 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-coated slides. The sections were dewaxed and rehydrated, followed by 20 min of heat-induced epitope retrieval in EDTA buffer (pH 9.0). Next, they were incubated with polyclonal rabbit anti-human IgA heavy chain antibody (ProteinTech, Ref. 11449-1-AP) in primary antibody dilution buffer containing background reduction components (Agilent, Ref. S302283-2) at a dilution of 1:5000 for 15 min. Signal detection was performed using the Bond Polymer Refine Detection Kit (Leica, Ref. DS9800) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining and hematoxylin counterstaining. The sections were dehydrated, mounted, and examined under a microscope using a 40 × magnification. Images were captured using Leica imaging software. Five randomly selected fields were examined from each section, and the IgA-positive area was calculated using ImageJ software, expressing it as the percentage of IgA-positive area relative to the total tissue area.
Statistical analyses
Graphical presentations of the data were prepared using GraphPad Prism 10.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA), and the data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 29 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). A Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare the Respiratory Disease Score (RDS), macroscopic lung lesion score (MLCL), microscopic lung lesion score (MLL), the percentage of various cell subsets, the cytokine responses, and IgA in lung tissue between the two groups. The log10-transformed DNA loads of M. hyopneumoniae between the two groups were compared using LMM and a Mann–Whitney U test. The M. hyopneumoniae-specific antibody responses in serum and BALF (IgA and IgG) were analyzed using different tests. Binary crosstab analyses were used to examine frequency distributions and correlations of IgG-related parameters. Group differences in M. hyopneumoniae-specific antibody in serum were assessed using chi-squared tests. For IgA-related parameters in serum and BALF, generalized linear models (GLMs) were employed to determine the effects of independent variables on dependent outcomes. The correlations between the DNA load of M. hyopneumoniae in BALF, antibodies in serum and BALF, cytokines in BALF or %IgA + area in lungs on D49, and infection severity (RDS: from D22-49; MLCL and MLL: D49) in the C or V group were assessed using Pearson’s correlation analysis with a two-tailed test (GraphPad Prism software 10.0). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated, and the coefficient of determination (R2) is reported to evaluate the strength of the association. The strength of the correlation can be classified on the basis of the coefficient of determination () as follows: values below 0.3 indicate a weak correlation; values between 0.3 and 0.7 indicate a moderate correlation; values between 0.7 and 0.9 indicate a strong correlation; and values above 0.9 indicate a very strong correlation. The NC group was not included in the statistical analyses, as this group only served as a sentinel group to prove that the pigs were free of M. hyopneumoniae. Statistical results were considered significant when P ≤ 0.05.
Results
Clinical signs, lung lesions, and M. hyopneumoniae load
Clinical signs combined with laboratory analysis constitute the current standard diagnostic approach for porcine M. hyopneumoniae [28]. Most studies demonstrated that vaccines alleviate clinical signs and to a certain degree also eliminate M. hyopneumoniae from the host [17, 27]. In this study, vaccination significantly reduced the RDS from D36 to D49 (P = 0.03) as well as the M. hyopneumoniae DNA load in BALF on D49 (P = 0.001) as compared with the C group (Table 1). At the macroscopic level, darker-red and solid pulmonary consolidation areas at the apex of the lung was found in the C group. At the microscopic level, a large number of infiltrated neutrophils and proliferated epithelial cells were found. However, the differences for these two parameters were not statistically different between the groups (P = 0.142) (Table 1). Moreover, a moderate positive correlation was observed between the DNA load of M. hyopneumoniae and RDS (D22-D49) (R2 = 0.3644, P = 0.0223) or MLCL (R2 = 0.4094, P = 0.0137) in the V group (Additional file 3). The sentinel animals (NC group) remained negative for M. hyopneumoniae DNA throughout the study. Thus, vaccination reduced coughing and the M. hyopneumoniae DNA load in BALF upon infection.
Table 1.
Clinical signs and M. hyopneumoniae DNA load at different timepoints in control and vaccinated group.
| Clinical parameters | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parameters/group | Period or timepoint | C (n) | V (n) | ||
| Average | Median | Average | Median | ||
| RDS | D1 to D21 | 0.01 (20) | 0.00 (20) | 0.05 (20) | 0.00 (20) |
| D22 to D35 | 1.20 (20) | 1.11 (20) | 1.39 (20) | 1.04 (20) | |
| D36 to D49 | 2.49 (16)a | 2.07 (16) | 1.38 (14)b | 1.04 (14) | |
| D22 to D49 | 1.90 (16) | 1.55 (16) | 1.43 (14) | 1.00 (14) | |
| MLCL | D49 | 7.64 (16) | 6.51 (16) | 4.12 (14) | 2.81 (14) |
| MLL | D49 | 2.28 (16) | 2.20 (16) | 2.02 (14) | 2.03 (14) |
| Log10 M. hyo DNA/µL (qPCR) | D35 | 4.45 (19) | 4.13 (19) | 4.63 (18) | 4.29 (18) |
| D49 | 5.11 (16)a | 4.98 (16) | 4.96 (14)b | 4.60 (14) | |
C: not vaccinated but infected; V: vaccinated and infected. Pigs were vaccinated once with an inactivated M. hyo vaccine. (n) = number of animals in each group
D0: vaccination; D21: experimental infection; D35: necropsy of 4 animals in each group; D49: necropsy of the remaining animals
RDS: Respiratory Disease Score (RDS) was assessed daily
MLCL: Macroscopic lung lesion score was determined on D35 and D49
MLL: Microscopic lung lesions were assessed on D35 and D49
a,b Within a column, values with different superscript letters are significantly (P < 0.05) different.
Vaccination enhanced M. hyopneumoniae-specific antibody responses in serum and BALF
Previous studies showed that most M. hyopneumoniae vaccines induced humoral immune responses in pigs [17, 21, 29]. In this study, the antibody levels in serum and BALF were measured to determine whether vaccination triggered antibody responses (Figure 2). All pigs from the NC group tested negative during the whole period. After vaccination, all pigs (n = 20) from the C group tested negative. In the V group, all pigs (n = 20) tested negative on D0 and D7, while seven pigs seroconverted on D21, which differed significantly from the C group (P = 0.04) (Figure 2A). After challenge infection, all animals in the V group seroconverted in contrast to only two animals in the C group on D35 (P < 0.001). Antibody levels further increased till D49. As anticipated, serum antibody levels were induced following vaccination and increased following infection.
Figure 2.
Vaccine-induced antibody responses in serum and BALF of pigs vaccinated against M. hyopneumoniae on day 0 (D0), and experimentally infected on D21. C: non-vaccinated and challenged; V: vaccinated and challenged. D35: 2 weeks after challenge (necropsy of four animals in each group); D49: 4 weeks after challenge (necropsy of the remaining animals). Blood was collected on D0, D7, D21, D35, and D49. BALF was collected on D7, D35, and D49. A M. hyopneumoniea-specific antibodies in serum in the different treatment groups. The dashed pink line indicates the cutoff value (S/P ratio ≤ 0.30). B, C Serum IgA and IgG levels following vaccination and challenge infection. D, E BALF IgA and IgG levels following vaccination and challenge infection. The dashed light-orange lines indicate the cutoff value, which was calculated as the average OD of the samples of the NC group + three times the standard deviation. The solid gray line represents the median. Values are expressed as OD. An asterisk (*) over the bar indicates a significant difference (* indicates p ≤ 0.05, ** indicates p ≤ 0.01, *** indicates p ≤ 0.001, and **** indicates p ≤ 0.0001).
An in-house ELISA was carried out on serum and BALF samples to further investigate the vaccine-induced IgG and IgA levels (Figure 2B–E). M. hyopneumoniae-specific IgA and IgG levels in serum and BALF of the NC group were below the cutoff value at all timepoints. M. hyopneumoniae-specific serum IgA and IgG levels from the C and the V group were below the cutoff value on D0 and D7 (Figure 2B, C). In serum at D21, there was no significant difference between groups. However, in BALF at D35, the V group had significantly higher IgA (P = 0.005) and IgG (P = 0.02) levels as compared with the control group (C) (Figure 2D, E).
Vaccination reduced local cytokine production
In addition to alterations in antibody levels, vaccination against M. hyopneumoniae also induced changes in local cytokine production [27]. The concentration of different cytokines in BALF was measured in the different groups at different timepoints to understand whether the combination vaccine triggered a similar response as reported previously for M. hyopneumoniae vaccines (Figure 3A–F). The concentrations of all cytokines in the NC group were lower than in the C and V groups during the whole period. No differences in concentration of cytokines in BALF were observed between the C and V groups on D7 and D35. On D49, the concentration of IL-1β was also significantly higher in the C group as compared with the V group (P = 0.015), while IL-6 levels did not differ between both groups. Furthermore, the concentrations of TNF-α, CXCL-8, and IL-17A on D49 were also significantly higher in the C group compared with the V group (TNF-α, P = 0.043; CXCL-8, P = 0.027; IL-17A, P < 0.001). The concentration of IL-10 differed between these two groups, albeit not significantly (P = 0.07). These results indicate that vaccination reduced the levels of IL-1β, TNF-α, CXCL-8, and IL-17A in BALF at 4 weeks after challenge infection.
Figure 3.
Cytokines in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of pigs vaccinated against M. hyopneumoniae on day 0 (D0), and experimentally infected on D21. C: non-vaccinated and challenged; V: vaccinated and challenged. D35: two weeks after challenge (necropsy of four animals in each group); D49: 4 weeks after challenge (necropsy of the remaining animals). BALF was collected on D7, D35, and D49. The concentrations (pg/mL) of IL-10 (A), IL-1β (B), IL-6 (C), TNF-α (D), and CXCL-8 (E) were determined using a multiplex immunoassay. The concentration of IL-17A (F) was determined with a commercial ELISA. The solid gray line represents the median. D: days after vaccination. An asterisk (*) over the bar indicates a significant difference (* indicates p ≤ 0.05, ** indicates p ≤ 0.01, *** indicates p ≤ 0.001, and **** indicates p ≤ 0.0001).
To understand whether these cytokine levels were associated with disease severity, we performed correlation analyses. A weak positive correlation was observed between the IL-1β concentration (D49) and RDS (D22-D49) in the C group (R2 = 0.2881, P = 0.0321) and a moderate positive correlation between the IL-1β concentration and RDS (D22-D49) (R2 = 0.5079, P = 0.0042) and MLCL (D49) (R2 = 0.6655, P < 0.0001) in the V group (Additional file 3). Moreover, a weak positive correlation was also found between the IL-17A concentration (D49) and MLL (D49) in the C group (R2 = 0.2122, P = 0.0544) (Additional file 3).
Vaccination triggered cell-mediated immunity
Elucidating the activation of immune cell populations in peripheral tissues and lymph nodes is critical for evaluating the immunogenicity of M. hyopneumoniae vaccines [4, 17, 30]. On this basis, we evaluated cytokine production by various T cell subsets in recall assays (Figure 4). Consistent with expectations, T cells from all pigs exhibited cytokine production following concanavalin A stimulation (data not shown). After vaccination, the percentage of IFN-γ+/TNF-α+ CD4+CD8α+ T cells (P = 0.026) (Figure 4A) and TNF-α+ CD3−CD4−CD8α+ cells (P = 0.002) (Figure 4B) in PBMCs were significantly higher in the V group than in the C group on D7. The percentage of TNF-α+ CD3−CD4−CD8α− cells was also significantly higher in the V group on D7 (P = 0.028) and D21 (P = 0.005) (Figure 4C). Furthermore, the proportion of proliferating CD3+ T cells in PBMCs was elevated in the V group compared with the C group on D7 (P = 0.008) and D21 (P < 0.001) (Figure 4E). Overall, vaccination induced the activation of IFN-γ+/TNF-α+ CD4+CD8α+ T cells, TNF-α+ CD3−CD8α+ cells and TNF-α+ CD3−CD4−CD8α− as well as the proliferating CD3+ T cells in blood after vaccination, while it may also reduce IFN-γ+ CD4+ T cells in blood 2 weeks after challenge (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
The percentages of M. hyopneumoniae-specific cytokine-producing immune cells and proliferation in blood of pigs vaccinated against M. hyopneumoniae on day 0 (D0), and experimentally infected on D21. C: non-vaccinated and challenged; V: vaccinated and challenged. D35: 2 weeks after challenge (necropsy of 4 animals in each group); D49: 4 weeks after challenge (necropsy of the remaining animals). Blood was collected on D0, D7, D21, D35, and D49. D21* means pigs were experimentally infected on D21. A–F The percentage of M. hyopneumoniae-specific cytokine-differentiating CD3+CD4+CD8α+ TNF-α+/IFN-γ+ cells, CD3−CD4−CD8α + TNF-α+ cells, CD3−CD4−CD8α− TNF-α+ cells, CD3+CD4+CD8α− IFN-γ+ cells, and proliferating CD3+ cells and CD3− cells in blood. The solid gray line represents the median; samples were considered positive if the percentage values exceeded the cutoff value (light-orange dotted lines). The cutoff value was calculated as the average value of the negative control group (NC) at each time point. Values are expressed as percentages (%). An asterisk (*) over the bar indicates a significant difference (* indicates p ≤ 0.05, ** indicates p ≤ 0.01, *** indicates p ≤ 0.001, and **** indicates p ≤ 0.0001).
When evaluating the presence of M. hyopneumoniae-specific T cells in the local draining lymph nodes, no significant differences were observed between the groups on D35. On D49, the percentage of TNF-α+ CD3−CD4−CD8α− cells was significantly higher in the C group as compared with the V group (P = 0.016) (Figure 5A). While the V group showed a trend toward a higher presence of IL-17A+ CD3+CD4+CD8α− cells compared with the C group (Figure 5B), the C group tended to exhibit a higher presence of IFN-γ+ CD3+CD4−CD8α+ cells (Figure 5C). In addition, the V group showed an increasing trend in the percentage of proliferating CD3+CD8α+ T cells as compared with the C group on D35 (Figure 5D). This indicated that, upon vaccination and challenge infection, M. hyopneumoniae-specific T cells are present in the bronchial lymph nodes 2 weeks after the challenge infection.
Figure 5.
The percentages of M. hyopneumoniae-specific cytokine-producing immune cells and proliferation in bronchial lymph nodes (BLNs) of pigs vaccinated against M. hyopneumoniae on day 0 (D0), and experimentally infected on D21. C: non-vaccinated and challenged; V: vaccinated and challenged. D35: 2 weeks after challenge (necropsy of 4 animals in each group); D49: 4 weeks after challenge (necropsy of the remaining animals). BLNs were collected on D35 and D49. D21* means pigs were experimentally infected on D21. A–D show the percentage of M. hyopneumoniae-specific cytokine-differentiating CD3−CD4−CD8α− TNF-α+ cells, CD3+CD4+CD8α− IL-17A+ cells, CD3+CD4−CD8α+ IFN-γ+ cells, and proliferating CD3+CD8α+ cells in BLNs. The solid gray line represents the median; samples were considered positive if the percentage values exceeded the cutoff value (light-orange dotted lines). The cutoff value was calculated as the average value of the negative control group (NC) on D49. Values are expressed as percentages (%). An asterisk (*) over the bar indicates a significant difference (* indicates p ≤ 0.05, ** indicates p ≤ 0.01, *** indicates p ≤ 0.001, and **** indicates p ≤ 0.0001).
Local mucosal immunity was induced in both groups upon infection
Some studies on porcine respiratory diseases have demonstrated that IgA responses in vaccinated animals only appear following challenge infection [31, 32]. Therefore, the percentage of IgA antibody positivity in lung tissue from the C and V groups was measured on D35 and D49 in our study. Although the percentage of the IgA+ area in both groups was higher than that observed in the NC group, no significant difference was detected between the two groups on D49 (Figure 6). There was however a weak positive correlation between the %IgA + area and MLCL (R2 = 0.2746, P = 0.0372) (Additional file 3).
Figure 6.
Immunohistochemical detection of IgA in lung tissue of pigs on D35 and D49. Pigs of the V group were vaccinated against M. hyopneumoniae on day 0 (D0). Pigs of the V and C groups were experimentally infected on D21. C: non-vaccinated and challenged; V: vaccinated and challenged. A Representative staining from each group; piglets infected with M. hyopneumoniae, displaying numerous IgA-positive area (brown staining). White arrows indicate positive signals. B Percentage of positive IgA+ area in each group of lung tissues. The solid gray line represents the average; samples were considered positive if their percentage values exceeded the cutoff value. The light-orange dotted line represents the cutoff value, which was calculated as the average value of the negative control group (NC, 0.04%). Values are expressed as % of IgA+ area.
Discussion
This study investigated the immune responses upon vaccination of 24-day-old weaned piglets with a novel combined vaccine consisting of an inactivated M. hyopneumoniae vaccine with the capsid protein of PCV2d. Previously, we tested the immunogenicity of Hyogen, commercial M. hyopneumoniae vaccine, showing that it alleviated clinical signs, enhanced serum antibodies, and induced cytokines in BALF and peripheral blood [17]. In addition, another commercial M. hyopneumoniae vaccine induced long-lasting cell-mediated immunity even in the absence of detectable antibodies, highlighting the importance of cellular immune responses [21]. Furthermore, an inactivated vaccine candidate using an Mhp chimeric protein (P97R1-P46-P42) fused with CD40L as a molecular adjuvant enhanced antibody responses, lymphocyte proliferation, and IL-4 levels compared with conventional vaccines [33]. These studies collectively established a foundation for understanding M. hyopneumoniae vaccine-induced immunity. However, none investigated tissue-level immune responses as in the present study. Combined vaccines can be more easily implemented in farm health management practices and are also better for animal welfare and biosecurity as fewer injections are needed. Previous studies have highlighted the advantages of combined vaccines targeting Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and PCV2d in enhancing antibody responses and demonstrating safety [8–10, 22]. Concerning the mechanism involved in the increased M. hyopneumoniae antibody titers in BALF upon immunization and challenge infection, the prime–pull mechanism may play an important role. This prime–pull approach is often used to induce mucosal immune responses. In this approach, the systemic immune system is primed with a parenteral immunization, which triggers vaccine-specific lymphocytes at the local draining lymph nodes [34]. These vaccine-specific lymphocytes then circulate through the vascular system and populate the other lymph nodes. The push then consists of a mucosal immunization or, in our case, a challenge infection that recruits the lymphocytes to the site of the booster immunization or the challenge infection [35–37]. The present study focused on evaluating the immunogenicity and efficacy of this vaccine against M. hyopneumoniae challenge infection.
Three weeks post-vaccination, the piglets were experimentally infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strains F7.2C and F1.12A [18, 27, 35–37]. Clinical signs and immune responses were monitored throughout the study, and vaccinated and non-vaccinated animals were necropsied at weeks 2 and 4 post-infection to assess early and late responses. The data showed that, 1 week post-vaccination, the V group exhibited significantly increased levels of IFN-γ+/TNF-α+ CD4+CD8α+ T cells, TNF-α+ CD3−CD4−CD8α+ cells, and proliferative T cells in blood, with this effect persisting through 3 weeks post-vaccination. Furthermore, at 2 weeks after challenge, a markedly higher proportion of proliferative T cells was detected in peripheral blood and the bronchial lymph nodes of vaccinated animals. At 4 weeks post-infection, vaccinated animals exhibited a significantly lower proportion of TNF-α+ CD3−CD4−CD8α− cells. This indicates that the combined vaccine induced both local and systemic cell-mediated immunity. Concurrently, vaccinated animals demonstrated higher serum IgA and IgG levels, lower M. hyopneumoniae DNA load in BALF, and milder clinical signs.
Previous studies have shown that vaccination may not only reduce clinical signs but also reduce the number of pathogens in the respiratory tract, thereby improving performance [1, 18, 38]. Our study showed that the RDS from D35 to D49 was lower in vaccinated animals, and that the M. hyopneumoniae load was also reduced on D49. Although macroscopic lung lesion and microscopic lung lesion on D49 did not significantly differ between the two groups, vaccination still resulted in lower scores, which is consistent with findings reported in previous research [39]. M. hyopneumoniae infections cause chronic disease, and the lung lesions usually peak 2–4 weeks after infection [1]. The reduced clinical signs and M. hyopneumoniae DNA load in the vaccinated animals indicated that the vaccine is efficacious and may also reduce the possibility of transmission of M. hyopneumoniae [11, 40, 41]. Moreover, the M. hyopneumoniae DNA load correlated with the RDS (D22-D49) in the V group, suggesting that lower bacterial burden may contribute to less severe respiratory disease progression.
Intramuscular injection of commercial inactivated vaccines can induce the production of specific antibodies in the serum and the respiratory tract [39, 42]. This study showed that a single administration of the vaccine increased the serum levels of M. hyopneumoniae-specific antibodies on D21. In addition, IgA and IgG antibodies in the BALF of the vaccine group were higher than those of the control group 2 weeks after infection, which is also similar to a previous study [39]. This confirms that the vaccine might prime the mucosal immune system, resulting in an increased presence of antibodies in the BALF upon subsequent infection, and thus may play a role in reducing the number of M. hyopneumoniae copies [12, 39, 43]. A previous study has shown that local mucosal antibodies may play a role in preventing M. hyopneumoniae from adhering to the ciliated epithelium of the respiratory tract [39]. Another study, however, could not demonstrate an association between the IgA levels in the lung and protection [20]. Here, the percentage of IgA+ area in lung tissue weakly correlated with MLCL, implying that local mucosal humoral responses may increase in parallel with lesion severity. This may reflect a compensatory immune response aiming to control pathogen colonization at the respiratory mucosal surface. Future studies should investigate earlier time points after infection in more animals to investigate the impact of vaccination and infection on IgA levels in lung tissues.
Previous studies have indicated that inactivated vaccines can provide partial protection against M. hyopneumoniae infection and colonization of the lower respiratory tract by modulating the inflammatory responses [30, 44, 45]. This study showed that the concentrations of IL-1β, CXCL-8, TNF-α, and IL-17A in the BALF of vaccinated animals were lower than in non-vaccinated animals on D49, and IL-10 was numerically lower in the non-vaccinated animals on D49. For the pro-inflammatory cytokines, these are consistent with previous results from our group [17, 27]. IL-10 is a typical anti-inflammatory factor that can act as a negative feedback mechanism to limit tissue damage [16]. Our results on IL-10 production in BALF differ from those in a previous study [17], which may be related to differences in infection conditions or individual variation. Further investigation is needed to clarify this discrepancy. CXCL-8 plays a key role in neutrophil recruitment during M. hyopneumoniae infection. In our study, CXCL-8 levels were lower in the vaccinated animals than in the non-vaccinated animals, suggesting that vaccination mitigated the excessive inflammatory response in the lung while maintaining effective immune control of the pathogen [46]. The increase of these cytokines in BALF points to an inflammatory response and related tissue damage [16, 47–49]. In addition, IL-1β levels are associated with disease severity. In the C group, a weak positive correlation between IL-1β concentration and RDS was observed, whereas in the V group, moderate correlations were observed between IL-1β levels and both RDS and MLCL. These results indicate that IL-1β may be closely linked to inflammatory processes involved in lesion development, and its elevated levels could reflect enhanced host inflammatory responses associated with increased disease severity. Additionally, a weak positive correlation was identified between IL-17A concentration and MLL in the C group, suggesting that IL-17A may also participate in the inflammatory response during infection.
Vaccine-induced cellular immune responses are also reflected in the cytokine production and proliferation of different T cell subsets, mainly including CD4+ T cells, CD8α+ T cells and CD4+CD8α+ T cells. These T cell subsets are considered important for protection against M. hyopneumoniae infection [27]. Commercial inactivated vaccines have also been shown to induce different T cell subsets in blood [17, 20, 50–52]. The present results on different T cell subsets in the blood showed that, just 1 week after immunization, IFN-γ+/TNF-α+ CD3+CD4+CD8α+ cells were detected, while proliferating T cells were detected at both 1 and 3 weeks after vaccination. These findings suggest that the vaccine elicited polyfunctional, antigen-experienced CD4+CD8α+ T cell responses, which are indicative of an effective cellular immune activation [14, 25]. In addition, TNF-α+ CD3−CD4−CD8α+ cells (natural killer (NK) cells) were induced in vaccinated animals on D7 and D21, respectively. NK cells are characterized by their ability to kill cells infected with intracellular pathogens and their production of IFN-γ and TNF-α upon their activation [53]. Whether these NK cells can recognize antigens or pathogen recognition receptor ligands associated with M. hyopneumoniae or if they are induced by cytokines in the recall assay remains unresolved. Furthermore, TNFα+ CD3−CD4−CD8α− cells were also induced upon vaccination. These cells most likely represent innate B cells, which create a suitable microenvironment for T cell responses and memory formation [17, 47–50, 54]. These results suggest that the vaccine induced a cell-mediated immune response.
Studies on H1N1 influenza A virus infection have shown that the immune response in BLNs may be closely related to the clearance of the pathogen and resolution of lesions [55]. The present study showed that, 4 weeks after challenge, the TNF-α+ CD3−CD4−CD8α− cells (B cells) in BLNs of vaccinated animals were lower than in the non-vaccinated animals. In murine infection models, B cells have been identified as an important source of TNF-α, which contributes to CD4+ T cell expansion and pathogen clearance [56, 57]. Although there was no difference between the groups at D35, we still found that the IL-17A-producing CD4+CD8α− T cells and proliferating CD8α+ CTLs in the BLNs were higher in vaccinated than in non-vaccinated animals. IL-17A is the hallmark cytokine produced by Th17 cells that promotes immune cell mobilization from bone marrow and neutrophil recruitment to sites of infection. In the lung, IL-17A activates airway epithelial cells to produce chemokines such as CXCL-8 to attract neutrophils and to induce local inflammation [58–60]. In contrast, IL-17A+ CD4+CD8α− T cells were detected in BLNs at 2 weeks after challenge in this study, which suggests that antigens had been transported to the BLNs through antigen-presenting cells, such as dendritic cells, inducing local IL-17A secretion. The proliferation of CD8α+ T cells in the BLNs also suggests that the vaccine may contribute to the early control of M. hyopneumoniae infection. Similar observations of local CD8+ T cell activation have been reported in swine influenza virus studies in pigs [55, 61]. Interestingly, the presence of TNF-α+ CD3−CD4−CD8α− cells, IL-17A-producing CD4+ T cells, and proliferating CD8α+ CTLs in the BLNs upon M. hyopneumoniae vaccination was shown for the first time. Studies on M. hyopneumoniae infection and/or vaccination have not yet investigated cellular immunity in local draining lymph nodes, but they provide strong evidence that the vaccine successfully induced cellular immunity in lymphoid tissues [62–64].
Following intramuscular vaccination, the combined vaccine rapidly induced systemic and local cellular immunity, characterized by increased IFN-γ+/TNF-α+ CD4+CD8α + T cells, NK cells, and proliferating T cells in peripheral blood. Vaccination also activated IL-17A-producing CD4+ T cells and cytotoxic CD8α+ T cells in bronchial lymph nodes, supporting early control of M. hyopneumoniae infection. Humoral and mucosal immunity were enhanced, with elevated specific antibodies in serum and BALF after challenge, reducing pathogen load. Furthermore, vaccinated piglets displayed lower pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, CXCL-8, TNF-α, and IL-17A) in BALF, alleviating excessive pulmonary inflammation. Although lung lesion scores were not significantly different, vaccinated animals showed milder clinical signs and reduced bacterial loads, with activation of innate immune cells further contributing to protective immunity against M. hyopneumoniae.
In conclusion, the combined vaccine triggered local and systemic humoral and cellular immune responses specific for M. hyopneumoniae. These vaccine-induced immune responses lead to reduced clinical signs and the DNA load of M. hyopneumoniae upon challenge infection. Together, our results show that the combined vaccine triggered M. hyopneumoniae-specific immune responses in pigs that protected piglets against clinical signs upon challenge infection with M. hyopneumoniae.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1. Macroscopic and microscopic lung lesion scores at D35 in control and vaccinated pigs upon challenge infection. C: not vaccinated but infected; V: vaccinated and infected. Pigs were vaccinated once with an inactivated M. hyo vaccine. (n) = number of animals in each group. MLCL: Macroscopic lung lesion score was determined on D35. MLL: Microscopic lung lesions were assessed on D35.
Additional file 2. All parameters from the NC group. Piglets (n = 45) were divided into 3 groups. 20 piglets were vaccinated on D0 (V) and challenged with M. hyo after 3 weeks (D21), 20 piglets were not vaccinated but challenged (C), the remaining 5 piglets were as the negative control (NC); Eight pigs (4 from the V and 4 from the C groups) were euthanized 2 weeks after challenge (D35), the remaining ones were euthanized at D49. Blood was collected on D0, D7, D21, D35 and D49. BALF was collected on D7, D35 and D49. Lung tissue and bronchial lymph nodes (BLN) were collected on necropsy day (D35 and D49). NC: not vaccinated and not infected. One Piglet (Number: 14) couldn’t collect the blood and BALF sample on D35. MLCL: Macroscopic lung lesion score was determined on D49. MLL: Microscopic lung lesions were assessed on D49. D0: vaccination; D21: experimental infection; D35: necropsy of 4 animals in each group; D49: necropsy of the remaining animals.
Additional file 3. Correlations between the DNA load of M. hyopneumoniae, cytokines in BALF or %IgA area in lung tissue and clinical signs (RDS, MLCL and MLL) in the C or V group. The figure only shows the data with significant correlations; for the other parameters, the correlations were not statistically different (P > 0.05). The blue dots represent the data from the control group (C), and the light green dots represent the data from the vaccinated group (V). RDS: Respiratory Disease Score (RDS) was assessed daily. MLCL: Macroscopic lung lesion score was determined on D49. MLL: Microscopic lung lesions were assessed on D49.
Additional file 4. Gating strategy to assess cytokine production and proliferation by T cells with CytExpert software. All plots shown are obtained from M. hyopneumoniae-stimulated cells, isolated from piglets of the control (C) and vaccine (V) groups.
Additional file 5. Representative dot plots of cytokine production in blood by T cell subsets with CytExpert software. All plots shown are obtained from M. hyopneumoniae-stimulated T cells, isolated from piglets of the control (C) and vaccine (V) groups with three conditions (Medium, Concanavalin A and M. hyopneumoniae).
Additional file 6. Representative dot plots of cytokine production in Bronchial lymph nodes by T cell subsets with CytExpert software. The %CD3-CD4-CD8α- TNF-α+ producing dot plots shown T cells isolated from piglets in the C and V groups under three conditions (Medium, Concanavalin A, and M. hyopneumoniae) on D49.
Additional file 7. Representative dot plots of T cell proliferation in blood. The %CD3+ proliferation dot plots shown are obtained from T cells, isolated from piglets of the C and V groups with three conditions (Medium, Concanavalin A and M. hyopneumoniae).
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge Charlotte Helsmoortel, Nidhal Guendouz, Andreas Vanderhaeghen, and Emma Vanbeylen from the Laboratory of Immunology at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Ghent University for their assistance during the experiment, Prof. dr. Koen Chiers for his assistance with histopathological and immunohistochemistry evaluation, and colleagues at the Unit of Porcine Health Management for their help with sample collection.
Authors' contributions
LW performed the animal experiments, the laboratory work, and together with IC performed the statistical analyses of the data. KC, APK, and XYM contributed to the acquisition of experimental samples and conducted laboratory analyses during the trial period. DM, BD, and FVI designed and supervised the overall project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The study was partially funded by CEVA Santé Animale, Libourne, France. CEVA Santé Animale participated in the study design and in the review of the final manuscript. LW is supported by a scholarship of the China Scholarship Council (grant no. 202307550005). XM is supported by a scholarship of the China Scholarship Council (grant no. 202407550008).
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and the Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University (approval no. EC2024-023).
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Dominiek Maes and Bert Devriendt equally contributed to this work.
Contributor Information
Dominiek Maes, Email: dominiek.maes@ugent.be.
Bert Devriendt, Email: b.devriendt@ugent.be.
References
- 1.Maes D, Sibila M, Kuhnert P, Segalés J, Haesebrouck F, Pieters M (2018) Update on Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections in pigs: Knowledge gaps for improved disease control. Transbound Emerg Dis 65:110–124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Minion FC, Adams C, Hsu T (2000) R1 region of P97 mediates adherence of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae to swine cilia. Infect Immun 68:3056–3060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sibila M, Nofrarías M, López-Soria S, Segalés J, Valero O, Espinal A, Calsamiglia M (2007) Chronological study of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection, seroconversion and associated lung lesions in vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs. Vet Microbiol 122:97–107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Biebaut E, Beuckelaere L, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Gomez-Duran C-O, Devriendt B, Maes D (2021) Transfer of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae-specific cell mediated immunity to neonatal piglets. Vet Res 52:96 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pagot E, Rigaut M, Roudaut D, Panzavolta L, Jolie R, Duivon D (2017) Field efficacy of Porcilis® PCV M Hyo versus a licensed commercially available vaccine and placebo in the prevention of PRDC in pigs on a French farm: a randomized controlled trial. Porcine Health Manag 3:3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Nielsen GB, Haugegaard J, Jolie R (2018) Field evaluation of a ready-to-use combined Porcine circovirus type 2 and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccine in Denmark - a historical comparison of productivity parameters in 20 nursery and 23 finishing herds. Porcine Health Manag 4:29 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tzika ED, Tassis PD, Koulialis D, Papatsiros VG, Nell T, Brellou G, Tsakmakidis I (2015) Field efficacy study of a novel ready-to-use vaccine against mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and porcine circovirus type 2 in a Greek farm. Porcine Health Manag 1:15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Allen M, Roerink F, Crowley A, Knetter S, Morgan C, Wei H, Segers R (2025) Efficacy and safety of a tri-valent ready-to-use porcine circovirus type 2a, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis vaccine in weaned pigs. Vaccines 13:681 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9.Ham S, Suh J, Kim C, Seo BJ, Park GS, Chae C (2024) A field evaluation of a new porcine circovirus type 2d and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae bivalent vaccine in herds suffering from subclinical PCV2d infection and enzootic pneumonia. Vet Med Sci 10:e70001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Krejci R, Trampus P, Csagola A, Szalai T, Palmai N, Toth A, Terenyi N, Nagy Z, Szeplaki NA, Somogyi G, Barna T, Rausch E, Penzes Z, Szaszko M, Lorincz Z (2025) Efficacy of a new ready-to-use vaccine against PCV-2d and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae under experimental conditions. Vet Med (Praha) 70:196–202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Suh J, Ham S, Oh T, Chae C (2023) Cross-protection of a porcine circovirus types 2a/b (PCV-2a/b) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae trivalent vaccine against a dual PCV-2e and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae challenge. Can J Vet Res 87:297–302 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Thacker EL, Thacker BJ, Young TF, Halbur PG (2000) Effect of vaccination on the potentiation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-induced pneumonia by Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Vaccine 18:1244–1252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kobisch M, Blanchard B, Le Potier MF (1993) Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigs: duration of the disease and resistance to reinfection. Vet Res 24:67–77 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Asai T, Okada M, Ono M, Mori Y, Yokomizo Y, Sato S (1994) Detection of interleukin-6 and prostaglandin E2 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids of pigs experimentally infected with Mycoplasma hyponeumoniae. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 44:97–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Asai T, Okada M, Ono M, Irisawa T, Mori Y, Yokomizo Y, Sato S (1993) Increased levels of tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 1 in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids from pigs infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 38:253–260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lorenzo H, Quesada O, Assunçao P, Castro A, Rodríguez F (2006) Cytokine expression in porcine lungs experimentally infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 109:199–207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Beuckelaere L, Haspeslagh M, Biebaut E, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Krejci R, Meyer E, Gleerup D, De Spiegelaere W, Devriendt B, Maes D (2022) Different local, innate and adaptive immune responses are induced by two commercial Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae bacterins and an adjuvant alone. Front Immunol 13:1015525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Michiels A, Arsenakis I, Boyen F, Krejci R, Haesebrouck F, Maes D (2017) Efficacy of one dose vaccination against experimental infection with two Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strains. BMC Vet Res 13:274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Saraiva M, Vieira P, O'Garra A (2020) Biology and therapeutic potential of interleukin-10. J Exp Med 217:e20190418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20.Maes D, Boyen F, Devriendt B, Kuhnert P, Summerfield A, Haesebrouck F (2021) Perspectives for improvement of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccines in pigs. Vet Res 52:67 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Biebaut E, Beuckelaere L, Boyen F, Haesebrouck F, Gomez-Duran CO, Devriendt B, Maes D (2023) Long-term follow-up of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae-specific immunity in vaccinated pigs. Vet Res 54:16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Suh J, Ham S, Na H, You Y, Park B, Chae C (2025) Experimental efficacy of a novel combined vaccine of porcine circovirus types 2a/d, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and M. hyorhinis. Vaccines 13:951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 23.Marchioro SB, Maes D, Flahou B, Pasmans F, Del Pozo Sacristán R, Vranckx K, Melkebeek V, Cox E, Wuyts N, Haesebrouck F (2013) Local and systemic immune responses in pigs intramuscularly injected with an inactivated Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccine. Vaccine 31:1305–1311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hannan PC, Bhogal BS, Fish JP (1982) Tylosin tartrate and tiamutilin effects on experimental piglet pneumonia induced with pneumonic pig lung homogenate containing mycoplasmas, bacteria and viruses. Res Vet Sci 33:76–88 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vicca J, Stakenborg T, Maes D, Butaye P, Peeters J, de Kruif A, Haesebrouck F (2003) Evaluation of virulence of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae field isolates. Vet Microbiol 97:177–190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Marois C, Dory D, Fablet C, Madec F, Kobisch M (2010) Development of a quantitative Real-Time TaqMan PCR assay for determination of the minimal dose of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strain 116 required to induce pneumonia in SPF pigs. J Appl Microbiol 108:1523–1533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Matthijs AMF, Auray G, Boyen F, Schoos A, Michiels A, García-Nicolás O, Barut GT, Barnier-Quer C, Jakob V, Collin N, Devriendt B, Summerfield A, Haesebrouck F, Maes D (2019) Efficacy of three innovative bacterin vaccines against experimental infection with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Vet Res 50:91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Simionatto S, Marchioro SB, Maes D, Dellagostin OA (2013) Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae: from disease to vaccine development. Vet Microbiol 165:234–242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Thacker EL, Thacker BJ, Boettcher TB, Jayappa H (1998) Comparison of antibody production, lymphocyte stimulation, and protection induced by four commercial Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae bacterins. J Swine Health Prod 6:107–112 [Google Scholar]
- 30.Petri FAM, Malcher CS, Mechler-Dreibi ML, Panneitz AK, Braga ER, Aguiar GA, Toledo LT, Martins TS, Cides-da-Silva LC, Fantini MCA, Sant’Anna OA, Montassier HJ, Oliveira LG (2024) Shedding reduction and immunity modulation in piglets with an inactivated Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae vaccine encapsulated in nanostructured SBA-15 silica. Vaccine 42:126268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Thomas M, Wang Z, Sreenivasan CC, Hause BM, Gourapura JR, Li F, Francis DH, Kaushik RS, Khatri M (2015) Poly I:C adjuvanted inactivated swine influenza vaccine induces heterologous protective immunity in pigs. Vaccine 33:542–548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Binjawadagi B, Dwivedi V, Manickam C, Ouyang K, Torrelles JB, Renukaradhya GJ (2014) An innovative approach to induce cross-protective immunity against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in the lungs of pigs through adjuvanted nanotechnology-based vaccination. Int J Nanomed 9:1519–1535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shu J, Li G, Shu J, Feng H, He Y (2025) CD40 ligand potentiates immunogenecity of Mycoplasma pneumoniae subunit vaccine candidate in a murine model. Curr Issues Mol Biol 47:37 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tregoning JS, Buffa V, Oszmiana A, Klein K, Walters AA, Shattock RJ (2013) A “prime-pull” vaccine strategy has a modest effect on local and systemic antibody responses to HIV gp140 in mice. PLoS One 8:e80559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Sonalio K, Boyen F, Devriendt B, Chantziaras I, Beuckelaere L, Biebaut E, Haesebrouck F, Santamarta I, de Oliveira LG, Maes D (2024) Rationalizing the use of common parameters and technological tools to follow up Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infections in pigs. Porcine Health Manag 10:31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Michiels A, Arsenakis I, Matthijs A, Boyen F, Haesaert G, Audenaert K, Eeckhout M, Croubels S, Haesebrouck F, Maes D (2018) Clinical impact of deoxynivalenol, 3-acetyl-deoxynivalenol and 15-acetyl-deoxynivalenol on the severity of an experimental Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in pigs. BMC Vet Res 14:190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shahana S, Björnsson E, Lúdvíksdóttir D, Janson C, Nettelbladt O, Venge P, Roomans GM (2005) Ultrastructure of bronchial biopsies from patients with allergic and non-allergic asthma. Respir Med 99:429–443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Meyns T, Dewulf J, de Kruif A, Calus D, Haesebrouck F, Maes D (2006) Comparison of transmission of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in vaccinated and non-vaccinated populations. Vaccine 24:7081–7086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Thacker EL, Thacker BJ, Kuhn M, Hawkins PA, Waters WR (2000) Evaluation of local and systemic immune responses induced by intramuscular injection of a Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae bacterin to pigs. Am J Vet Res 61:1384–1389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Oh T, Park KH, Yang S, Jeong J, Kang I, Park C, Chae C (2019) Evaluation of the efficacy of a trivalent vaccine mixture against a triple challenge with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, PCV2, and PRRSV and the efficacy comparison of the respective monovalent vaccines against a single challenge. BMC Vet Res 15:342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yang S, Oh T, Park KH, Cho H, Suh J, Chae C (2021) Experimental efficacy of a trivalent vaccine containing porcine circovirus types 2a/b (PCV2a/b) and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae against PCV2d and M hyopneumoniae challenges. Vet Microbiol 258:109100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sibila M, Calsamiglia M, Vidal D, Badiella L, Aldaz A, Jensen JC (2004) Dynamics of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in 12 farms with different production systems. Can J Vet Res 68:12–18 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yang J, Hooper WC, Phillips DJ, Talkington DF (2004) Cytokines in Mycoplasma pneumoniae infections. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 15:157–168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xie M, Huang Z, Zhang Y, Gan Y, Li H, Li D, Ding H (2025) The Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae protein Mhp274 elicits mucosal and systemic immune responses in mice. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 15:1516944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.He Y, Xie K, Yuan Z, Ouyang T, Dong A, Ling B, Zeng W, Fang Y, Song Y, Wang L, Ding H, Zhao M, Fan S, Yi L, Zhao D, Chen J (2024) A subunit vaccine based on P97R1, P46, P42, and P65 from Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae can induce significant immune response in piglets. Front Vet Sci 11:1493650 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Thanawongnuwech R, Young TF, Thacker BJ, Thacker EL (2001) Differential production of proinflammatory cytokines: in vitro PRRSV and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae co-infection model. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 79:115–127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rodríguez F, Rosales RS, Ramírez AS, Poveda JB (2023) Vaccination upregulates Th1 cytokines in the lung of pigs experimentally infected with mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Animals (Basel) 13:520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Almeida HMS, Mechler-Dreibi ML, Sonálio K, Ferraz MES, Storino GY, Barbosa FO, Maes D, Montassier HJ, de Oliveira LG (2020) Cytokine expression and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae burden in the development of lung lesions in experimentally inoculated pigs. Vet Microbiol 244:108647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bin L, Luping D, Bing S, Zhengyu Y, Maojun L, Zhixin F, Yanna W, Haiyan W, Guoqing S, Kongwang H (2014) Transcription analysis of the porcine alveolar macrophage response to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. PLoS One 9:e101968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dobbs NA, Odeh AN, Sun X, Simecka JW (2009) The multifaceted role of t cell-mediated immunity in pathogenesis and resistance to mycoplasma respiratory disease. Curr Trends Immunol 10:1–19 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sarradell J, Andrada M, Ramírez A, Fernández A, Gómez-Villamandos J, Jover A, Lorenzo H, Herraez P, Rodriguez F (2003) A morphologic and immunohistochemical study of the bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue of pigs naturally infected with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Vet Pathol 40:395–404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kick AR, Tompkins MB, Hammer JM, Routh PA, Almond GW (2011) Evaluation of peripheral lymphocytes after weaning and vaccination for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Res Vet Sci 91:e68-72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ihim SA, Abubakar SD, Zian Z, Sasaki T, Saffarioun M, Maleknia S, Azizi G (2022) Interleukin-18 cytokine in immunity, inflammation, and autoimmunity: biological role in induction, regulation, and treatment. Front Immunol 13:919973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Summerfield A (2021) Immune responses against porcine Mycoplasma infections. Mycoplasmas in swine. CABI Wallingford UK, pp 109–125 [Google Scholar]
- 55.Khatri M, Dwivedi V, Krakowka S, Manickam C, Ali A, Wang L, Qin Z, Renukaradhya GJ, Lee CW (2010) Swine influenza H1N1 virus induces acute inflammatory immune responses in pig lungs: a potential animal model for human H1N1 influenza virus. J Virol 84:11210–11218 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Trebichavský I, Šplíchal I, Barot-Ciorbaru R (1995) Expression of TNF-α in pig fetal cells stimulated in vitro. Folia Microbiol 40:417–420 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Frasca D, Romero M, Diaz A, Alter-Wolf S, Ratliff M, Landin AM, Riley RL, Blomberg BB (2012) A molecular mechanism for TNF-α-mediated downregulation of B cell responses. J Immunol 188:279–286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Nadeem A, Al-Harbi NO, Alfardan AS, Ahmad SF, AlAsmari AF, Al-Harbi MM (2018) IL-17A-induced neutrophilic airway inflammation is mediated by oxidant-antioxidant imbalance and inflammatory cytokines in mice. Biomed Pharmacother 107:1196–1204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wiehler S, Proud D (2007) Interleukin-17A modulates human airway epithelial responses to human rhinovirus infection. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 293:L505-515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Fan X, Shu P, Wang Y, Ji N, Zhang D (2023) Interactions between neutrophils and T-helper 17 cells. Front Immunol 14:1279837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tungatt K, Dolton G, Morgan SB, Attaf M, Fuller A, Whalley T, Hemmink JD, Porter E, Szomolay B, Montoya M, Hammond JA, Miles JJ, Cole DK, Townsend A, Bailey M, Rizkallah PJ, Charleston B, Tchilian E, Sewell AK (2018) Induction of influenza-specific local CD8 T-cells in the respiratory tract after aerosol delivery of vaccine antigen or virus in the Babraham inbred pig. PLoS Pathog 14:e1007017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Xu J, Huo C, Yang Y, Han J, Zhou L, Hu Y, Yang H (2025) Early highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection induces necroptosis in immune cells of peripheral lymphoid organs. Viruses 17:290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Fan B, Liu X, Bai J, Li Y, Zhang Q, Jiang P (2015) The 15N and 46R residues of highly pathogenic porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus nucleocapsid protein enhance regulatory T lymphocytes proliferation. PLoS One 10:e0138772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wu Q, Han Y, Wu X, Wang Y, Su Q, Shen Y, Guan K, Michal JJ, Jiang Z, Liu B (2022) Integrated time-series transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal different inflammatory and adaptive immune responses contributing to host resistance to PRRSV. Front Immunol 13:960709 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1. Macroscopic and microscopic lung lesion scores at D35 in control and vaccinated pigs upon challenge infection. C: not vaccinated but infected; V: vaccinated and infected. Pigs were vaccinated once with an inactivated M. hyo vaccine. (n) = number of animals in each group. MLCL: Macroscopic lung lesion score was determined on D35. MLL: Microscopic lung lesions were assessed on D35.
Additional file 2. All parameters from the NC group. Piglets (n = 45) were divided into 3 groups. 20 piglets were vaccinated on D0 (V) and challenged with M. hyo after 3 weeks (D21), 20 piglets were not vaccinated but challenged (C), the remaining 5 piglets were as the negative control (NC); Eight pigs (4 from the V and 4 from the C groups) were euthanized 2 weeks after challenge (D35), the remaining ones were euthanized at D49. Blood was collected on D0, D7, D21, D35 and D49. BALF was collected on D7, D35 and D49. Lung tissue and bronchial lymph nodes (BLN) were collected on necropsy day (D35 and D49). NC: not vaccinated and not infected. One Piglet (Number: 14) couldn’t collect the blood and BALF sample on D35. MLCL: Macroscopic lung lesion score was determined on D49. MLL: Microscopic lung lesions were assessed on D49. D0: vaccination; D21: experimental infection; D35: necropsy of 4 animals in each group; D49: necropsy of the remaining animals.
Additional file 3. Correlations between the DNA load of M. hyopneumoniae, cytokines in BALF or %IgA area in lung tissue and clinical signs (RDS, MLCL and MLL) in the C or V group. The figure only shows the data with significant correlations; for the other parameters, the correlations were not statistically different (P > 0.05). The blue dots represent the data from the control group (C), and the light green dots represent the data from the vaccinated group (V). RDS: Respiratory Disease Score (RDS) was assessed daily. MLCL: Macroscopic lung lesion score was determined on D49. MLL: Microscopic lung lesions were assessed on D49.
Additional file 4. Gating strategy to assess cytokine production and proliferation by T cells with CytExpert software. All plots shown are obtained from M. hyopneumoniae-stimulated cells, isolated from piglets of the control (C) and vaccine (V) groups.
Additional file 5. Representative dot plots of cytokine production in blood by T cell subsets with CytExpert software. All plots shown are obtained from M. hyopneumoniae-stimulated T cells, isolated from piglets of the control (C) and vaccine (V) groups with three conditions (Medium, Concanavalin A and M. hyopneumoniae).
Additional file 6. Representative dot plots of cytokine production in Bronchial lymph nodes by T cell subsets with CytExpert software. The %CD3-CD4-CD8α- TNF-α+ producing dot plots shown T cells isolated from piglets in the C and V groups under three conditions (Medium, Concanavalin A, and M. hyopneumoniae) on D49.
Additional file 7. Representative dot plots of T cell proliferation in blood. The %CD3+ proliferation dot plots shown are obtained from T cells, isolated from piglets of the C and V groups with three conditions (Medium, Concanavalin A and M. hyopneumoniae).
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.






