Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1972 Jul;18(1):107–112. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-107

Control of preference in children by conditioned positive reinforcement1

Judith Elbert Favell, James E Favell
PMCID: PMC1333988  PMID: 5078089

Abstract

A preference measure was employed with children to evaluate the conditioned positive reinforcing function of a stimulus that preceded reinforcement. A match-to-sample procedure was arranged in which subjects could respond to either the form or color dimension of a compound sample stimulus. Intermittent token reinforcement was provided equally for color and form matches. Two stimuli were employed (Stimulus A and Stimulus B), each consisting of a distinctive tone and colored light. One of these stimuli (the paired stimulus) preceded each token delivery, and the other did not (nonpaired stimulus). The paired stimulus was dependent upon each response to one match dimension, and the nonpaired stimulus followed each response to the other dimension. Three of the five subjects responded primarily to the dimension that was followed by the paired stimulus. This effect was obtained regardless of which stimulus (A or B) was paired and on which match dimension (color or form) the paired stimulus was dependent. These results were unaltered by discontinuing the nonpaired stimulus. The other two subjects demonstrated consistent preferences for the form dimension and Stimulus A, respectively.

Full text

PDF
107

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clark H. B., Sherman J. A. Effects of a conditioned reinforcer upon accuracy of match-to-sample behavior in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 May;13(3):375–384. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. FINDLEY J. D., BRADY J. V. FACILITATION OF LARGE RATIO PERFORMANCE BY USE OF CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Mar;8:125–129. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kelleher R. T. Conditioned reinforcement in second-order schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):475–485. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Stubbs A., Galloway W. D. Conditioned reinforcement and discrimination performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):23–31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. ZIMMERMAN J. TECHNIQUE FOR SUSTAINING BEHAVIOR WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT. Science. 1963 Nov 8;142(3593):682–684. doi: 10.1126/science.142.3593.682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Zimmerman J., Hanford P. V. Sustaining behavior with conditioned reinforcement as the only response-produced consequence. Psychol Rep. 1966 Oct;19(2):391–401. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.2.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES