Skip to main content
Journal of Toxicologic Pathology logoLink to Journal of Toxicologic Pathology
. 2026 Jun 10;39(2 Suppl):141S–173S. doi: 10.1293/tox.2025-0197

INHAND: Non-proliferative and proliferative lesions of fish – Chapter 7. Fish integumentary system

Wes Baumgartner 1, Ute Bach 2, James Baily 3, Christine Ruehl-Fehlert 2, Stacey Fossey 4, Satoshi Furukawa 5, Yuki Kato 6, Victoria Laast 7, Emily Meseck 8, Heike Schmidt-Posthaus 9, Helmut Segner 9, Shiva Kumar Shanmukhappa 10, Jan Spitsbergen 11, Jeffrey Wolf 12,*
PMCID: PMC13340211  PMID: 42416792

Introduction

The skin is the largest mucosal surface of the fish and is continuous with the respiratory, olfactory, digestive, and urogenital systems. It serves not only in protection (physical barrier, mucosal immunity), but in communication, sensory perception, respiration, ion regulation, locomotion, and thermal regulation1,2,3. The skin is a semipermeable membrane that functions in biotransformation and excretion4. Variation between species is wide. In general, the skin is comparatively similar to mammals, with some important differences which will be described.

The thickness and character (pigmentation, breeding tubercles) of the skin varies according to the area of the body examined as well as the age, environmental conditions, gender, and season (reproduction)2, 5. Adnexal structures are lacking. This chapter deals with the skin, including epidermis, dermis, chromatophores (pigment cells), and scales. The lateral line system and other mechanosensory and chemosensory tissues associated with the skin are further described in the ‘Special senses chapter’. Fins are described in the ‘musculoskeletal’ chapter.

Response to Injury

The healing response of fish skin is rapid; the initial response is the production of excess mucus with rapid migration of epithelial cells to cover any defects, which can be accomplished within hours6, 7. Teleosts are also capable of regenerating fins entirely. Grossly the skin may develop distinct color changes as a result of alterations in the cuticle (increased mucus-blue/grey sheen), epidermal and dermal edema (white/milky), necrosis (white/milky), inflammation/neoplasia, pigment accumulation/loss/dispersion, bacterial biofilms (yellow, i.e. Flavobacterium columnare), or epithelial hyperplasia (white, yellow)8,9,10.

Compared to mammals the histopathological changes exhibited by fish skin are limited and the effects induced by different stressors are often similar11, 12. However, this does not mean skin disease in fish is a simpler matter. The physiology and nature of the mucus/cuticle layer, which is invisible/lacking on H&E slides, is of vital importance to tissue health and disease pathogenesis yet it is poorly understood and difficult to investigate. Compared to terrestrial animals the effects of water in terms of removing/flushing away substances, cells and pathogens from the surface, as well as the osmotic forces (waterlogging in freshwater fish) imposed on the skin, adds considerable complexity to disease mechanisms and interpretation in aquatic species.

Often the first indicator of disease is the production of abundant mucus, which is a general sign of skin irritation and is often accompanied by secretory cell hypertrophy or hyperplasia, and generalized epidermal hyperplasia. Such changes often manifest in parasitic, bacterial, viral, hormonal, and toxin related injury4, 13, 14. The initial secretion of abundant mucus provides an enhanced barrier to bind and remove irritants, and the character of the mucus may change over time or in the presence of toxins13, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. Mucous cell and other secretory cell differentiation is continuous and adaptive4. Hyperplasia in fish skin occurs at all cell levels, not just the basal layer.

Inflammation in fish skin is evidenced in the early stages by intercellular edema/spongiosis and intracellular edema, which may progress to keratinocyte discohesion, vesicle formation, necrosis, and erosion or ulceration10. Neutrophils are briefly present in very early stages of inflammation; lymphocytes tend to predominate thereafter9.

Certain areas of a fish’s body may be more susceptible to injury than others, whether due to perfusion, variation in epithelial cell types (natural defenses), or varied water turbulence16, 25, 26. Ulceration is a very common outcome of skin inflammation and can, with secondary infection by environmental microbes, progress rapidly. A 10% loss of skin surface integrity (scale loss/ulceration) can cause mortality, likely through osmotic stress27. Inadequate mucus production as a consequence of ulceration may also increase the energy cost of locomotion28. Once established, an ulcerative process will involve the deep dermis and hypodermis, sometimes extending into muscle. The shape of an ulcer, often triangulate when viewed in cross section from epidermis to hypodermis, varies depending on an external or internal origin; the narrowest portion tends to be the origin25. For example, a small focal lesion originating in the epidermis may develop into a much larger broad lesion in the hypodermis due to spread of infection25.

The classical stages of wound healing (re-epithelialization, inflammation, proliferation, granulation tissue, remodeling) are conserved in fishes29, 30. Re-epithelialization is very rapid and is not dependent on blood clotting or inflammation.

Epithelial cells at wound margins maintain their desmosome attachments to one another, moving as a group rather than as individualized cells6, 29,30,31. The epithelium along the edges of a wound may separate from the basement membrane in early stages, possibly as a result of reduced hemidesmosomal attachments32, 33. Filament cells in the intermediate portion of the epidermis migrate over, or intercalate with, the basal cell layer; mitoses are not evident until wound closure is complete34, 35.

Nodules in the skin are common manifestations of microbial disease and parasitic infestations and are dealt with in both this chapter and in the ‘soft tissues’ chapter; however detailed treatment of specific conditions may be found in the literature9, 14, 36.

Necropsy and Trimming

Fish skin is extremely delicate, and artifacts are inevitable, but distortions must be carefully accounted for and minimized whenever possible. The mucus cuticle is generally lost during standard processing and is not available for assessment. The slightest contact will denude the epidermis both before and after fixation. Fish must be handled gently prior to and duration euthanasia, with wet gloved hands to avoid skin damage. Also, be aware that the method of euthanasia can lead to artifactual distortion of tissue; for instance, unbuffered tricaine methanesulfonate solutions are irritating, injuring gills and potentially the skin as well (see Respiratory chapter for further comment).

Davidson’s solution (or the modified formulation) is recommended for skin studies due to its superior preservation of epidermis; however neutral buffered formalin is a common choice. Additionally, Davidson’s solution has decalcifying properties may alleviate artifacts encountered when cutting scales. Saturated EDTA can also be used to good effect and may be a preferable method for decalcification.

Compared to mammals, small fish can be completely decalcified in a short time span.

I. Morphology, Physiology, Nomenclature, Diagnostic Criteria, and Differential Diagnosis

1. Epidermis

The skin of fish is broadly composed of three layers: epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis. The outermost layer of integument is that of mucus, or the cuticle, which is composed of the secretions of surface epithelial cells, goblet cells, sacciform cells, club cells, and sloughed epithelial cells; it is approximately 1–2 mm thick, but is usually lost during histologic processing3, 37,38,39,40. Specialized histologic techniques to retain the cuticle have been published41, 42.

Keratinocytes: The epidermis is delicate, stratified and squamous (from 2, up to 30 or more cells thick); it does not keratinize except in certain species (rarely used in toxicologic studies). The basic unit of the epidermis, the keratinocyte (variably termed filament, polygonal, or Malpighian cells), is metabolically and mitotically active in all layers, however mitoses are most common along the basal layer43. Epithelial cells are generally similar throughout the layers; however, a basal layer (stratum basale), an intermediate/mucous layer, and a superficial (pavement) layer are evident; toward the surface cells flatten. They attach to one another at all levels by desmosomes, which in the outer layer (pavement cells) form part of the water-tight terminal web37, 44. The pavement cell layer contains abundant microfilaments that may help protect the skin from osmotic shocks45. The subjacent cells are separated by intercellular spaces that contain lymph fluid but do not communicate with the surface/water2. Basal cells are also involved in the development of dermal stroma and scales45,46. Epithelial cells have the capacity for antigen sequestration or phagocytosis and will, when filled with ingested content, slough from the surface47, 48. Epithelial cell translocation/maturation, from basal layer to the surface, can occur in as little as 4 days49.

The pavement cells always have surface modifications in the form of species-specific microridges that impart a fingerprint pattern to the surface for cuticle adherence; they are plastic features that are often modified or altered due to physiology or injury2, 50,51,52. In some species the surfaces are papillate or pitted rather than ridged. Such cells contribute to surface secretions3. Prior to sloughing the pavement cells lose intercellular attachments and round up. Keratinization is exceptional, generally seen in surface specializations (nuptial tubercles, attachment organs, etc.), which are present in medaka53 and fathead minnow. The epidermis will undergo changes in association with reproductive cycle and life stages37.

Modified secretory cells: Various types of unicellular glands (mucous cells and other secretory cells) are abundantly present in the epidermis and derive from keratinocytes2, 49, 54, 55. Mucous cells are the most common and inhabit the middle to outer layers of the epidermis, but they often are attached to the basement membrane. They terminally differentiate from basal epithelial cells and enlarge as they move to the surface; cell shape, nuclear location, and secretory content change through the maturation cycle. Once at the surface, the cell ruptures and dies, releasing its content into the cuticle layer37. Goblet cells may have mucous or serous content and may vary in number according to area of the body, sex, season, stage of maturity, water conditions, and exposure to toxicants3, 19, 56. In some species, they have phagocytic abilities and may retain immunoglobulin. Sacciform cells (granular cells, clear mucous cells), a third type of secretory cell, are present in some species and are generally similar to goblet cells. Club cells (a fourth type of secretory cell) are large, round cells in the middle layers of the epidermis that have abundant homogeneous cytoplasm and one or two large nuclei. They are common in many species, and the cytoplasmic content contains Schreckstoff, or alarm substance, which is a pheromone released when the cells are damaged57. In some species, club cell numbers are seasonally dependent. In experimental skin injury and inflammation, club cells may contain leukocytes within their phagosomes146, 162. Venom cells, forming multicellular ductless holocrine glands, may be present at the base of fins spines.

Ionocytes or chloride cells are modified epithelial cells which are found most commonly in the gills but are present in the skin, particularly in larval stages58, 59.

Nerves/Sensory cells: The nerve fibers that penetrate the epidermis may ramify between epithelial cells, or they may be associated with individual or groups of specialized sensory cells60. Nerves that penetrate the basement membrane lack Schwann cell investments and are surrounded by epithelial cells. Mechanoreceptors and electroreceptors, termed neuromasts, will be further described in the lateral line system (Special senses chapter). Other multicellular receptors termed taste buds or chemoreceptors are present predominantly in the mouth, but also on the head.

Leukocytes: The skin of fish is an important site of mucosal immunity61.

Lymphocytes, macrophages, and other leukocytes are commonly present in the epidermis, particularly in the basal layers; B cells and plasma cells are the most numerous61,62,63. Dendritic cells are present in multiple fish species, and in zebrafish, heterogeneity in tissue-resident macrophage cell types has been described64. Eosinophilic granular cells/mast cells may be increased in disease conditions. Rodlet cells may also be present in the skin and in association with neuromasts65.

Melanocytes and melanin containing macrophages can occur in the epidermis-see further discussion in the chromatophore section of this chapter66.

2. Dermis

The dermis is composed of an outer stratum spongiosum (SS) and a deep stratum compactum (SC) that forms a collagenous sheath around the body, functioning in part as a tendon to aid locomotion and prevent splitting under tensile forces45. Dermal thickness varies with species, age, and area of the body2. It is separated from the epidermis by the basal lamina/basement membrane (BM), and the deep dermis is separated from the hypodermis by a thin sheet of distinctive fibroblasts attached by desmosomes, termed the ‘dermal endothelium’67. The BM is similar to that of terrestrial animals and is positively stained with PAS methods. BM thickness varies across the body, and even between scaled and non-scaled areas. In unscaled skin, the BM may adopt extensive infoldings into the basal layer; a possible adaptation to shearing stress37. In some cases, capillaries penetrate the epidermis, however they retain their investment by the BM68.

During development the basal epithelium is involved in the production of early dermal collagen and interacts with dermal mesenchymal cells in the formation of scales and fins45, 46. The fibroblasts that form the dermal endothelium in zebrafish appear at 3 days post-fertilization and begin to contribute to dermal stroma production along the deep aspect. In the next several days, the primary dermal stroma becomes re-organized and more compact but is still acellular. By 26 days post-fertilization, the dermis has changed into the adult secondary dermal stroma (stratum compactum) with numerous fibroblasts scattered within45. At this time the dermal endothelial cells are now present in the SS that will develop into scales.

The SS is a loose network of collagen bundles containing fibroblasts, chromatophores (pigment cells), mast cells, and the scale beds. The SC is poorly cellular, with highly organized collagen sheets and little if any elastic fibers. The matrix is penetrated by vessels and nerves periodically, and in such areas melanocytes and mast cells are often present. The laminated collagenous structure of the SC resembles the cornea, allowing it to effectively transmit light to the underlying chromatophores while maintaining rigidity. This feature is important in the interpretation of gross changes in the skin, as edema will cause entering and reflected light to scatter, leading to opacity and the loss of chromatophore coloration macroscopically. The components of the dermal matrix are similar overall to those in mammals, with type I and type V collagens as major and minor collagens respectively. As the fish grows, collagen fibril diameter will increase markedly45.

In fish, the term “scale” refers to hard (generally mineralized), flattened skeletal elements in the dermis that arise from mesenchyme69, 70. They have various forms (placoid, ganoid, scutes) according to taxa; however, the most common is the elasmoid scale, which is seen in zebrafish, fathead minnows, and medaka and will be commented on here. Elasmoid scales are generally round and broadly overlap one another with posterior non-overlapping segments that are either smooth (cycloid) or finely toothed (ctenoid). They reside near the surface (in shallow pockets) and may be easily rubbed off or removed/resorbed as a result of natural habits (nest building, spawning). Most teleosts lose their scales at least once in a lifetime71. They represent a primary calcium reservoir, and minerals are resorbed preferentially from scales compared to the endoskeleton72. Osteoclasts of regenerating scales are found on the episcleral surfaces; they exhibit MMP-9, TRAcP and cathepsin K, similar to mammals73, 74.

The matrix of the scale may include various mineralized tissue types, including dentine and enamel/enameloid in some taxa. The term “scleroblast” has been coined to generally describe the cells that produce any of the mineralized tissues in a scale. Elasmoid scales are thin, flexible and transparent with a basal plate (also internal layer or fibrillary plate) of highly-ordered, variably mineralized collagenous tissue (composed of elasmodine), an external layer (superficial mineralized layer, osseous layer), and an outer limiting layer; the upper surface is marked by concentric elevated mineralized circuli (striae) and intervening non-mineralized sulci68 (Figs. 7.11 and 7.12). They usually overlap one another within the dermis; the non-overlapping posterior segment is covered by epidermis. In most cases, scales exhibit continuous growth, with addition of annular striae (annuli); alterations in annular rings/overall growth are indicative of various stressors2. Scales are composed of three components ultrastructurally; collagen, a cement-like non-fibrillar collagen material “ichthylepidin”, and hydroxyapatite-like crystals75, 76.

Fig. 7.11.

Fig. 7.11.

Fathead minnow, male. Nuptial tubercle, pre-estrogen. H&E, 100×. Image courtesy of Jeffrey Wolf.

Fig. 7.12.

Fig. 7.12.

Fathead minnow, male. Nuptial tubercle, decreased. Reduced size was caused by experimental exposure to exogenous estrogens. H&E, 100×. Image courtesy of Jeffrey Wolf.

Each scale resides within a scale pocket in the SS, and the pocket is lined by layers of mesenchymal cells (dermal endothelium) which differentiate to form scales within dermal papillae. The upper layers develop into scale-forming scleroblasts (marginal zone, episquamal, and hyposquamal populations), while a deeper population constitutes the scale-pocket lining (SPL) cells, which serve to produce scale plate collagen and to regenerate scales68, 70, 77 (Figs. 7.1-a–e and 7.2). The SPL cells (dermal endothelial cells) appear similar to fibroblasts but are joined by desmosomal attachments as are the scleroblasts, sometimes termed osteoblasts or elasmoblasts78, 79. Scleroblasts/osteoblasts produce alkaline phosphatase, and scale matrix contains osteocalcin and osteonectin74. Histologically, mature scales in fish are typically non-descript, being slender with tightly lamellated collagen layers and few associated mesenchymal cells.

Fig. 7.1.

Fig. 7.1.

Microscopic structure of the ontogenic and regenerating scales of a goldfish. a) Scales (ontogenic) in pockets, with anchoring bundles of collagen, scale forming cells (scleroblasts) and scale pocket lining cells. b) Enlargement of the posterior (non-overlapping) region of a scale, showing elements of growth and mineralization. c) The skin immediately after scale removal, with empty scale pockets. The scleroblasts along with epidermis and some dermal tissue have been removed, but scale pocket lining cells remain. d) Enlargement of a scale showing the lamellar, plywood-like structure where the basal plate elasmodine is crossed by sheets of vertical thin collagen fibers, characteristic of this species. e) Enlargement of a regenerating scale showing the orthogonal plywood-like structure of basal plate elasmodine typical of regenerating scales in teleosts and ontogenic scales in some species. Hyposquamal scleroblasts that produce the collagen of the basal plate are cuboidal in regenerating scales. The outer limiting layer is not present in newly regenerated scales. Abbreviations: bp: basal plate; cf: calcification front; ch: chromatophore/melanocyte; co: circulus; dct: dense connective tissue (stratum compactum); ep: epidermis; es: episquamal scleroblast; ex: external layer; hs: hyposquamal scleroblast; lct: loose connective tissue (stratum spongiosum); mc: Mandl’s corpuscle; ms: marginal scleroblast; ol: outer limiting layer; r: radius; sca: scale; sp: scale pocket; spl: scale pocket lining cells; tc: vertical thin collagen fibers. Sources: From Elliott, 200038, after Bereiter-Hahn and Zylberberg, 1993 (A,C,D,E)71, Elliott 2000 (B–adapted from others, cited)38, with permission from Elsevier.

Fig. 7.2.

Fig. 7.2.

Histological section of the skin of a juvenile chinook salmon, showing elements of scale growth. The ends of the scales (sca) are visible with episquamal scleroblasts (es), marginal scleroblasts (ms), and hyposquamal scleroblasts (hs). The basal plate (bp), external layer (ex), and circuli (ci) of the scales are evident. Other elements in the loose connective tissue layer (lct) include scale pocket lining cells (spl), melanocytes (me), and the basement membrane (bm). Cells in the epidermis include attenuated surface epithelial cells (sec), mid-level epithelial cells (ec), and cuboidal basal cells (bl) as well as goblet cells (gc), and serous cell (ser) that may be a serous goblet cells or sacciform cell. Scale bar is 10 micrometers. From Elliott, 200038 with permission from Elsevier.

The three layers of the scale have structural similarities to fish teeth; the outer limiting layer is similar to enamel while the external layer and basal plate are composed of dentine-like material69. The external layer is formed first and appears similar to woven bone; it is entirely formed and mineralized at the time of development with no further thickening, only lateral growth. The basal plate is then deposited deep to the external layer by deep scleroblasts (elasmoblasts) and continues to thicken throughout the life of the scale; it is partially mineralized (superficial layers) and is composed of orderly stacks of elasmodine, which imparts transparency80.

Elasmodine is a form of lamellar dentine rather than of true bone, with thick collagen bundles and rare Sharpey’s fibers81. In some species there are vertically oriented fibers that run perpendicular to the layers in the basal plate (TC fibers), which are processes of the hyposquamal scleroblasts82, 83. As a rule, scale matrix is acellular, however occasional scleroblasts may become entrapped in lacunae83. A third layer, the hypermineralized outer limiting layer, is devoid of collagen (lacks Sharpey’s fibers) and is deposited on the non-overlapping scale regions in very close proximity to the epidermis; it also thickens, in periodic fashion, throughout life81, 84, 85. The scale itself is anchored within the pocket by collagen bundles arising from the posterior aspect of the upper surface. When they are shed, the epidermis is lacerated but heals quickly (as early as 3 hours)71, 78. The mineralization of the scale layers occurs by different mechanisms; scleroblasts direct the mineralization of the external layer, while scleroblasts and SPL cells are involved in mineralization of the basal plate82, 86,87,88. The limiting and external layers may stain with Alcian blue, while the external and basal layers are PAS positive89.

Scales are also intimately associated with the lateral line mechanosensory system (described special senses chapter), where canals penetrate scales. A lateral line scale (tubular scale, pored scale) is composed of a scale plate and a canal tube (bony vault, canal housing) which is the bony tissue surrounding the canal90. Additionally, in fish that lack scales (certain catfish like Ictalurus punctatus) bone (canal tubes) may partly or completely surround lateral line canals, suggesting that the tubes may be of different origin than scales; a point raised for other species as well91.

The hypodermis is a fatty, well vascularized, areolar tissue that blends into the subjacent musculature. Adipocytes, chromatophores, blood vessels, lymphatics, and nerves are present in this layer68.

The lymphatic system/secondary vascular system is an important component of the integument of the fish and is dealt with in greater detail in the cardiovascular system chapter92. The lymphatic volume of the skin and musculature is more than 4 times the blood volume in fish; disease, especially ulcers, can severely affect blood parameters and animal health in ways not readily appreciated by investigators more familiar with terrestrial laboratory species9.

3. Chromatophores

Color in adult fish is determined by pigmentation patterns that depend upon the presence of pigmented cells (chromatophores) in the skin, and exhibit plasticity over time through two mechanisms: ‘physiological’ color change and ‘morphologic’ color change93. Not only do fish have an embryologic color pattern, but as adults they have a dorso-ventral countershading pattern as well as a striping pattern (particularly zebrafish)93. The striping pattern of zebrafish is formed via the interactions of melanophores, xanthophores, and iridophores through mutual attraction, repulsion, clonal expansion, and cell survival94, 95.

Color change mechanisms are mediated largely by the endocrine system (including melatonin, melatonin concentrating hormone, ACTH, prolactin, estrogen, and testosterone) and the sympathetic nervous system (nerve endings and neurotransmitters-catecholamines)96, 97. “Physiological” change is a rapid process whereby pigment organelles are shifted within the cells, while “morphological” change is accomplished over weeks and is a result of pigment cell loss, altered morphology, and variation in pigment synthesis/amounts98. In addition, pigment cells can respond directly to incident light. Morphological change may be a response to diet, stress, temperature, reproductive phase, background patterns, UV exposure, ophthalmic system impairment, varied salinity, mechanical pressure, and maturation2. Color patterns are the result of a complex process where pigment cells associate by attraction and repulsion97. In many species of amphibians and reptiles, the pigment cell types congregate into orderly ‘dermal chromatophore units’; however in fish these are not as common98.

Chromatophores are a diverse population of neural crest cells that generate membrane-bound organelles (arising from endoplasmic reticulum-ER) to absorb light, impart color, or reflect light. The pigmentation patterns in zebrafish have an embryologic and adult form95. In the embryologic pattern chromatophores differentiate directly from the neural crest, migrating dorsolaterally along the body surface as well as ventromedially along nerves to the dorsal root ganglia99, 100. Melanocyte progenitors are SOX10 positive, and express MITF (microphthalmia transcription factor), KIT, TYR (tyrosinase), TYRP1 (tyrosinase-related protein 1), and DCT (dopachrome tautomerase) along embryologic and adult melanocyte development pathways101. Other chromatophore types are regulated by different receptor-ligand pairs; iridophores by leukocyte tyrosine kinase, and xanthophores by colony stimulating factor95. Embryonal chromatophores eventually die and are replaced by adult cells.

During metamorphosis, another set of chromatophores develop from stem cell intermediates that reside in the dorsal root ganglia, and migrate along nerves to the skin, where they first differentiate into bipotent chromatophores (melanocyte-iridophore or melanocyte-xanthophore) and then proliferate to become well differentiated cells100, 102. While they arise from a similar origin, chromatophore types respond differently to hormone and nervous control98.

Chromatophores are classically designated by the in vivo color/appearance (to the unaided eye) rather than by the chemical composition of the pigment organelles, which is a cause for some confusion since they are not strictly correlated. However, separation of cell types can also be made by the type of pigment contained; namely those that contain melanins (eumelanin, pheomelanin) and those that lack melanin but contain other substances, whether reflective or light absorbing (pteridines, carotenoids, purines, etc.)103. However, the common origin for these cells is evident in that more than one active pigment type may be found in the same chromatophore. Pigmented cells are conspicuous by light microscopic evaluation and variation may denote subtle evidence of pathology. A thorough description of any chromatophore should include: cell color in vivo, chemical identification of pigments, and ultrastructural examination to verify organelle types since different species may achieve the same color through different pigment mechanisms104. Chromatophores in fish skin are generally seen in the dermis; however, epidermal melanocytes (and extensions) and xanthophores may be seen, depending on species98. In cases of skin injury, melanocyte extensions may be present in the epidermis along with pigment containing-macrophages105. Within the dermis, chromatophores tend to congregate in two areas; at the interface of the epidermis and dermis, and the interface of the dermis with the subcutis, the stratum argenteum106.

Melanin containing cells can be further subdivided into those that actively transfer melanosomes to other cells (typical mammalian melanocytes), or those that maintain melanosomes (non-transferring) within the cell, termed melanophores. Melanocytes are the only chromatophores that are known to transfer pigment98. Melanosomes in fish have been reported to form via multivesicular premelanosomes, as well as fibrillar premelanosomes seen typically in mammals107, 108. Premelanosomes are more common in epidermal melanocytes as compared to dermal melanocytes98. The terminological distinction between ‘melanocyte’ and ‘melanophore’ will not be maintained throughout the text, and the term ‘melanocyte’ will refer to both, as suggested by others109. In fish, the epidermal melanocytes can be of the actively transferring type, but all other chromatophores are of the non-transferring type98, 110. Melanocytes are most common in the dermis just beneath the basal lamina (gadoids and siluroids) and in fish contain only eumelanin37. They are also very common in the peritoneum and meninges in fish. The relationship between dermal and epidermal melanocytes has not been resolved; some have suggested that epidermal melanocytes originate from, or are a degenerate form of, dermal melanocytes111, 112. Depending on the mutant or color variety of medaka (and presumably other species) melanocytes may be amelanotic, where melanosomes respond appropriately to nervous and hormonal stimuli, but lack pigmented content113,114.

Aside from melanocytes, other light-absorbing cells include xanthophores (yellow), erythrophores (red), and cyanophores (blue). Xanthophores and erythrophores produce their color by a combination of pteridines (in pterinosomes) and carotenoid-filled vesicles and are reality the same basic pigment cell type103. Yellow cells are considered xanthophores (containing xanthosomes), red cells are considered erythrophores (containing erythrosomes), and orange cells can be referred to as either97. The only way reliable way to differentiate between them is by their color in vivo; they have no molecular or structural markers to distinguish them109. Xanthophores and erythrophores produce water soluble pteridines in a manner similar to melanosome formation, producing pterinosomes that have a characteristic multivesicular configuration ultramicroscopically103. In addition, these cells achieve their color with lipid-soluble carotenoid droplets associated with the endoplasmic reticulum that are obtained from the diet. Cyanophores are not commonly encountered.

Two types of reflecting pigment cells are recognized: iridophores and leucophores, which both appear white but are distinguished by organelle structure. Iridophores lack pigment organelles, but instead utilize stacked purine crystal platelets to reflect light, and provide the reflective shine seen in many species of fish. These stacked platelets are usually composed of guanine, but uric acid, hypoxanthine, and adenine may be present103. There is evidence that pteridines also contribute to light reflection in iridophores and leucophores115. In zebrafish the iridophores in the skin are of two types; type S which have many small uniform platelets and type L, which have fewer large platelets116. Iridophores form a distinct layer in the dermis, the stratum argenteum, which is provides the characteristic reflective sheen of the skin.

Leucophores are much less common than iridophores (killifish Fundulus heteroclitus, Danio species including zebrafish, medaka Oryzias latipes, guppy Poecilia reticulata), and have organelles (leucosomes) that contain uric acid, among other substances, to produce a white color by scattering light rather than reflecting it98, 104, 117. They are more closely related to xanthophores than iridophores.

Like melanocytes, other chromatophores are present at both cutaneous and non-cutaneous sites. Additionally, certain pigment cells may contain two or more prominent pigment compounds, termed the dichromatic chromatophores (erythro-iridophores, erythro-cyanophores, xantholeucophores, melanoleucophores)104, 109, 118. Lastly, fluorescent chromatophores have recently been described in fish119, 120. The presence of differentiated chromatophores with more than one pigment organelle type is not surprising, given their shared origin from the neural crest. Such “mosaic” chromatophores with intergrade organelles have been reported in fish, tumor cell lines and in neoplasms121,122,123,124,125,126. Furthermore, chromatophore pigment composition can change to a limited degree with development; leucophores in larval medaka can appear orange due to pteridines127. The medaka has four pigment cell types; melanocyte, xanthophore, iridophore, and leucophore97. The zebrafish skin contains melanocytes, xanthophores, iridophores, and mosaic chromatophores including xantholeucophores and melanoleucophores104, 116, 128.

Pigmentation patterns in fish have been intensively studied for many years. In zebrafish strains, variation in pigment pattern can be categorized into 4 broad classes according to changes in the chromatophores: 1) reduced chromatophore numbers, 2) abnormal chromatophore distribution, 3) reduced chromatophore pigment (incomplete melanogenesis, delayed melanogenesis, or melanocyte degeneration), 4) abnormal chromatophore morphology (spindly, small, stellate)129. Such changes are also evident when fish are exposed to various compounds128. Degenerate melanocytes are likely engulfed and eliminated by macrophages130. Pigmentation defects, whether hypopigmentation/albinism or hyperpigmentation, are thought to arise from disturbances occurring during specific times in development, a ‘pigmentation window’. Diet, stress, and endocrine disorders have been implicated93.

4. Physiology

Fish skin is hydrated, unkeratinized, and covered by mucus, making it particularly susceptible to waterborne chemicals and stressors. As a result, skin disease is relatively more common in fish than in terrestrial vertebrates. The high cutaneous permeability of fish provides an opportunity for the exchange of gases, nutrients, metabolic waste, and xenobiotics1, 4. Pavement cells exhibit micropinocytosis at the surface, as well as the development of multiple cell-surface ring structures, which lead to the formation of macropinosomes131. Keratinocytes are also involved in the metabolism of xenobiotics, in part through cytochrome P450 enzymes132.

The mucoid cuticle is a vital structure that is both mucous and proteinaceous, containing glycoproteins, mucopolysaccharides, and lipids that are continuously secreted and washed off the body133. Production is highly dynamic in both quantity and quality; highly variable responses are reflected in alteration in composition. In addition to the reduction in friction and protection from toxicants afforded by mucus, osmotic gradients within the mucus help regulate hydration, salt, and ion needs4. Mucus is also an essential feature of the immune system; it functions to protect the skin from parasites, bacteria and predators by the secretion of mucins, enzymes, innate system components (complement, lectins, peptides), and immunoglobulins61,134. Nevertheless, fish skin has its own bacterial and fungal microbiome135.

Fish skin also has a limited capacity for respiration, which may provide oxygen for its own demands or for systemic needs in certain species. This capacity is pronounced in larvae and in eel, where skin may contribute the majority of the oxygen uptake4.

Changes in the coloration of fish skin may occur rapidly (physiologic change) or slowly (morphological change) and are often indicative of stress. Physiologic changes, under nervous and endocrine control, arise from changes in pigment granule motility. Morphologic change results from changes in the number and size of chromatophores, as well as the amount of pigment in a cell38. Generalized or segmental pigment change in the skin may be associated with abnormal neurologic function.

II. Microscopic Findings – Epidermis, Integument

Table 1 shows nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and differential diagnosis of epidermis.

Table 1. Nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and differential diagnosis of epidermis.

Epidermis Common Uncommon Not observed, but potentially relevant Not applicable
Non-proliferative
Apoptosis X

*Atrophy X

*Edema X

*Erosion/Ulcer X

*Increased cellularity, Rodlet cells X

*Infiltrate, inflammatory cell X

Inflammation X

*Necrosis X

*Nuptial tubercles/Dorsal nape pad, present /increased /decreased X

*Parasite X

*Pustule X

*Vesicle X

Proliferative

Non-neoplastic
*Hyperplasia, epidermis X

*Hyperplasia, modified secretory cell X

Neoplastic
*Papilloma X

*Carcinoma X

*Terminology with diagnostic criteria or comments described in the main text.

Epidermis – Non-Proliferative

Atrophy, epidermis

(Figs. 7.3 and 7.16)

Fig. 7.3.

Fig. 7.3.

Channel catfish. Skin. Atrophy, epidermis. H&E, 100×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.16.

Fig. 7.16

.Channel catfish. Skin. Atrophy, dermis (lateral line canal/dermal bone) and atrophy, epidermis. H&E, 40×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Modifiers

Keratinocyte, Modified Secretory, Sensory, Chloride Cell, Nuptial or breeding tubercles

Other Terms

• Epidermal thinning

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Result of reduced cell proliferation or increased turnover

Diagnostic Features

• Decreased number and/or thickness of epidermal layers

• Reduced number and size of cells whether epithelial, secretory, chemosensory, or chloride cell

• Changes in the pattern, number, and height of pavement cell microridges

Differential Diagnoses

• Erosion/ulcer: Loss of superficial layers (erosion) or all layers (ulcer).

• Necrosis, epidermal: Loss of cellular detail.

• Artifactual loss of epidermis post-mortem.

Comments

Atrophy may be associated with vitamin deficiencies, underlying expansile masses, increased temperature, chemicals and steroids105. Guppies treated with thyroxine and testosterone developed epidermal cell thinning, increased cell interdigitation, and alterations in the glycocalyx136. Partial ischemia or severe malnutrition are also possible etiologies. Exposure to acid water (pH 5.0) caused a transient (up to 3 days) epidermal atrophy due to loss of pavement cells and loss or expulsion of content by secretory cells at the surface, followed by compensatory hyperplasia over the next several days and weeks137. Goblet cell numbers may be decreased in association with gonadotropin or 11-ketotestosterone exposure138. If specific cell types within the epidermis are affected or are to be specifically described, then the modifiers may be applied.

Nuptial or breeding tubercles, normally present on the face of male fathead minnows, may atrophy in males upon exposure to exogenous estrogens2, 5.

Edema, epidermis

(Figs. 7.4 and 7.5)

Fig. 7.4.

Fig. 7.4.

Channel catfish. Skin. Edema, epidermis, intercellular. H&E, 200×. Image courtesy of Wes. Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.5.

Fig. 7.5.

Channel catfish. Skin. Erosion, epidermis, with edema, epidermis, intracellular and necrosis, epithelial (upper layers). The sensory papilla is in the center of the image. H&E, 200×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Comments

Intercellular edema (spongiosis) results from the expansion of intercellular spaces by edema fluid, but the epidermal cells remain connected to one another by desmosomal attachments3, 10. Severe edema may lead to rupture of these attachments, and vesicle formation139. Example of intraepidermal edema presented in Fig. 7.4 with erosion.

Erosion/ulcer, epidermis

(Fig. 7.5)

Comments

Erosion and ulcer are a continuum: erosions comprise loss of epithelial layers down to the basal layer while ulcers include the loss of all epithelial layers. The skin itself has an oxygen demand that is supplied from the environment; hypoxic water will lead to keratinocyte necrosis and subsequent erosion/ulceration140. While ulcers may derive from external causes, they often occur as a result of internal disease, particularly bacterial sepsis where organisms lodge in the skin vasculature141. Ulceration is often associated with inflammation, with early fibrin exudation and neutrophilic response that quickly changes to macrophage predominance. Secondary infections, as a result of environmental bacteria and/or fungi, are common in ulcers and may obscure the inciting cause. Chronic ulcers develop rounded hyperplastic epidermal margins and may include melanocyte hyperplasia142.

Abnormal temperatures, hypoxia, pH changes, UV exposure, toxin exposure, high water ammonia, nutritional deficiencies, and parasites are possible causes of ulcers2, 13, 143, 144.

As mentioned in the introduction, the epidermis of fish is extremely delicate and artifacts are inevitable; this is a frequent source of misdiagnosis145. Mild pressure to the tissue, even after euthanasia, may cause leakage of blood into the epidermis or around scales. The outer layers of the epidermis are typically removed by gentle contact which may result in misdiagnosis of erosion or ulceration when in fact this is a handling artifact.

Increased cellularity, rodlet cells, epidermis

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Focal accumulation of rodlet cells in the epidermis.

Diagnostic Features

• Cells contain fine, acicular, hyaline pink/red, evenly spaced, regimented crystalline structures in the cytoplasm and a basally located nucleus

• Rodlet cells may occur in small clusters

Differential Diagnoses

• Infiltrate, inflammatory cell

• Protozoan parasites

Comments

Rodlet cells are a cell type of uncertain or undetermined lineage, possibly with an inflammatory role, that is unique to fish; they are typically located in secretory epithelia (biliary, gills), endothelial surfaces (endocardium, small vessels in the cranium), renal hematopoietic tissues, and around neuromasts65. Increased numbers may indicate a heightened immune response and/or stress. Their appearance in the skin is not typical, and has been reported in association with polluted water, heavy metal exposure, saline stress, temperature stress, and/or wounds6, 105, 146.

Infiltrate, inflammatory cell, epidermis

(Figs. 7.6 and 7.7)

Fig. 7.6.

Fig. 7.6.

Largemouth bass. Skin. Infiltrate, lymphocyte, epidermis, due to intraepithelial myxozoan infestation. H&E, 200×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.7.

Fig. 7.7.

Channel catfish. Skin. Infiltrate, lymphocyte, epidermis. H&E, 200×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Comments

The epidermis is non-vascularized, and inflammatory cells derive from the dermis. It is important to recognize that low numbers of leukocytes, and in particular lymphocytes, are normally present in the epidermis as a part of immune system function. Inflammation as a result of exposure to microbial organisms and pathogens is a common occurrence, similar to mammals. Furthermore, non-specific injury to the skin, such as exposure to acidic or polluted water, will lead to increased numbers of inflammatory cells as well105, 137. Increased cortisol, a response to stress, can cause necrosis of epidermal lymphocytes12.

Necrosis, epidermis

(Figs. 7.8 and 7.9)

Fig. 7.8.

Fig. 7.8.

Channel Catfish. Skin. Necrosis, epidermis localized to the upper layers with karyorrhexis. H&E, 400×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.9.

Fig. 7.9.

Brown trout. Skin. Necrosis, epidermis, localized to the middle layers (ulcerative dermal necrosis syndrome). H&E, 200×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Modifiers

• Full Thickness

• Laminar

• Single cell

• Keratinocyte

• Modified Secretory

• Sensory

• Chloride Cell

Other Terms

• Necrolysis (full thickness)

• Sunburn

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Non-specific cell death of epidermal cells

Diagnostic Features

Full thickness/laminar

• Complete loss of cellular detail from the epidermis

• Often associated with epidermal separation with cell death of basilar layer and detachment from underlying dermis

• Cells may be affected in the outer, middle, or basal layers

Single cell

• Individual cells show hyaline hypereosinophilic cytoplasm and nuclear pyknosis

• Necrotic cells may be surrounded by leukocytes

• Non-degenerate, associated cells may have phagosomal bodies

• Intraepithelial lymphocytes may be misinterpreted as pyknotic keratinocyte nuclei

Differential Diagnoses

• Erosion/ulcer: Loss of epidermal layers, partial or complete

• Artifactual loss of epidermis post-mortem characterized by lack of inflammatory response.

Comments

Necrosis of epidermal cells occurs in spontaneous and experimentally induced lesions. The skin itself has an oxygen demand that is supplied from the environment; hypoxic water will lead to keratinocyte necrosis and subsequent erosion/ulceration140. Exposure of carp to acid water (pH 5.0) led to necrosis primarily of the pavement cells and surface secretory cells137. Necrosis of individual cells in ultraviolet light (UV) exposed epidermis have been described in some literature as ‘sunburn cells’141, although this term is no longer preferred. Higher doses of UV will lead to full thickness epidermal sloughing144. Skin necrosis has been reported as a result of various stressors including hypoxia146,147,148. Experimental exposure of cortisol to rainbow trout led to necrosis of the pavement cells (outer layer), secretory cells, and intra-epithelial lymphocytes12. Similar changes were evident in trout exposed to polluted river water105. If specific cell types within the epidermis are affected or are to be specifically described, then the modifiers may be applied. Exposure of trout to transient hyperthermia caused epidermal necrosis in the outer and inner layers, sparing the intermediate keratinocytes105. Epithelial cells are phagocytic and will contain phagosomal bodies in association with necrotic cells nearby105. Tissue handling artifacts may mimic epidermal necrosis145. Use of the terms necrosis, apoptosis and/or the combination term of apoptosis/necrosis in the skin are aligned with the INHAND publication149.

Nuptial tubercles/Dorsal nape pad, present/increased/decreased, epidermis

(Figs. 7.10, 7.11, and 7.12)

Fig. 7.10.

Fig. 7.10.

Fathead minnow, male. Dorsal nape pad, increased (Grade 3). Note the expansion of the underlying dermis by specialized mucoid-appearing collagenous matrix (mucochondroid). H&E, 100×. Image courtesy of Jeffrey Wolf.

Other Terms

• Nuptial tubercles

• Breeding tubercles

• Dorsal nape pad: “fat” pad

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• The dorsal nape pad is an androgen-induced bilaterally-symmetrical spongy plaque that develops normally on dorsal necks of reproductively-active mature male fathead minnows during the breeding season. Although sometimes referred to as a “fat pad”, the underlying dermis is actually expanded by a specialized mucoid-appearing collagenous matrix (mucochondroid)

• Reductions in the size and/or number of these structures in male fathead minnows can be caused by exposure to exogenous estrogens

• While typically nuptial tubercles and dorsal nape pads are entirely absent in females, nuptial tubercles and/or dorsal nape pads in females can be induced by exposure to exogenous non-aromatizable androgens

Diagnostic Features

• Nuptial tubercles are androgen-induced cone-shaped exophytic keratinized epidermal proliferations that develop normally on the faces of reproductively-active mature male fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas, during the breeding season. The pattern of tubercle formation is bilaterally symmetrical

• Nuptial tubercles may be increased in size and/or number, decreased in size and/or number or present in a sex not otherwise expected to exhibit them, depending on exposure to exogenous estrogen or androgens (see Comments)

Differential Diagnoses

• Papilloma: although microscopic appearance of an individual tubercle is similar to that of a papilloma, the presence of multiple bilaterally symmetrical tubercles on the face of a male fathead minnow should allow these to be differentiated from papilloma

Comments

The fathead minnow is a commonly used research model for endocrine disruption studies intended for regulatory agency submission. In such studies, alteration in the size and/or number of nuptial tubercles and/or dorsal nape pads (both are essentially secondary sex characteristics) is used frequently as external morphologic indicators of exposure to substances with estrogenic or androgenic activity150.

Parasite, epidermis

(Fig. 7.6)

Other Terms

• Infestation (if metazoan) and/or infection (if crustaceans, leeches, monogenea, ciliates, flagellates, amoebae, myxozoans, or hydroids)

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Dependent on the agent involved.

Diagnostic Features

• Identifiable protozoans or metazoans on or in the skin

• Erosion or ulceration of the epidermis

• Epidermal hyperplasia in chronic conditions

• Alteration in secretory cell numbers

• Alteration in secretory cell content

• Inflammation, often lymphocytes and macrophages

Differential Diagnoses

• None

Comments

A wide variety of organisms infect/infest fish skin, inducing varying degrees of inflammation, ulceration, and hyperplasia depending on the species and stage of infection151,152,153,154,155. Parasitism of the dermis and deeper tissues by protists may develop into epidermal cell parasitism as a result of severe infection.

It is also important to be aware of “X cells”, recently verified to be xenoma-forming protists (Xcellia spp. and Gadixcellia spp.), which are known to produce tumor-like papillary epidermal nodules in various species156. X cells appear very similar to hyperplastic keratinocytes or club cells and may be present in the dermis and epidermis; they have a large nucleus & nucleolus, lack intercellular bridges typical of keratinocytes, and occur in small groups157.

Pustule, epidermis

Comments

Epidermal pustules are rare in fish but are characteristic of certain disease conditions where intercellular edema and discohesion allow the accumulation of leukocytes. Pustules are named for the predominant leukocyte type. Pustules may develop as a fistulous process from deep dermal disease2.

Vesicle, epidermis

Comments

Vesicles can result from immune mediated injury, as a result of edema, trauma, parasitism, sunburn, or a combination of these factors158. Intraepidermal vesicles may develop from severe edema with cell rupture, known as ‘reticular degeneration’159. In ulcerative dermal necrosis syndrome of salmon, a pemphigoid pattern is produced139, 160.

Epidermis – Proliferative Non-Neoplastic

Hyperplasia, epidermis

Modifiers

• With Cellular Atypia

• Keratinocyte

• Sensory

• Chloride Cell

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Derives from epidermal cells; increased number of epidermal-derived cells

Diagnostic Features

• Increased thickness of epidermis, either generalized or plaque-like

• Rete ridge/dermal peg formation may be present, but is generally minimal

• Small clusters of filament cells may bulge from the surface

• Increased mitotic figures, can occur at all levels

• Keratinocytes may be hypertrophied

• Megalocytic cells are seen in certain herpesvirus infections

• Spongiosis or cyst formation may be present

• The basal lamina is intact

• Gland cell numbers may be increased or decreased

• Gland cells may be hypertrophied

• Chromatophores, esp. melanocytes may be increased

• Subjacent vascular networks may become prominent or atypical with cellular atypia

• Increased atypia, multinucleate cells, and whorls/pearls can be associated with more clearly demarcated plaques/nodules

Differential Diagnoses

• Papilloma: Thickened epidermis with exophytic/papilliform growth, extensive dermal interaction/ridging, well differentiated

• Carcinoma: Invasive growth into the basal lamina, increased mitoses and atypia

• Myxozoan parasite infections

• Cytomegaly (Lymphocystis) characterized by nodules formed by enlarged fibroblasts that contain iridovirus inclusions

• Infection with Gadixcellia and Xcellia parasites: Xenomas composed of large pleomorphic epithelioid protozoans (see gill chapter)

Comments

Epidermal hyperplasia results from a variety of chronic insults including inflammation, toxic irritation, abrasions, parasitism, extreme pH shifts, and UV exposure8, 137, 154, 161, 162. Similar insults often cause erosion/ulceration or atrophy in the early stages137. It is important to recognize that fish skin can vary markedly in thickness depending on the site sampled, sex, and time of year163. In white suckers from the Great Lakes, plaques of hyperplasia, bulging white mucoid lesions, papillomas, and carcinomas occurred on a continuum grossly and microscopically164. Hyperplasia may also present as small tufts or nodules in fish skin, particularly when they are in polluted waters, are host to parasites, or are at the low end of their temperature range10.

Depending on the species, hormones (prolactin, thyroxine, androgens, estrogens, corticosteroids, etc.) and increased exercise can potentially induce skin hyperplasia, increased filament cell turnover, and even atrophy12, 138, 165,166,167. Carp pox (cyprinid herpesvirus 1) is a well-known example of virus-induced epidermal hyperplasia, but other viruses have been reported168, 169. Giant karyomegalic cells have been reported in certain herpesvirus infections in pike, turbot, and cod170, 171. In some cases, gland cell changes are prominent13. Infection with myxozoan parasites, Myxobolus episquamalis for example, can mimic epidermal hyperplasia very well172. Infection of the skin by surface dwelling protozoans like Ichthyobodo sp. can induce hyperplasia of the pavement cell layer154. Keratinocyte hypertrophy has been described secondary to herpesvirus infection173. If specific cell types within the epidermis are affected or are to be specifically described, then the modifiers may be applied.

It is also important to be aware that when perusing the literature “X cells”, recently verified to be xenoma-forming protists (Xcellia spp. and Gadixcellia spp.), which are known to produce tumor-like papillary epidermal nodules156. X cells appear very similar to hyperplastic keratinocytes and may be present in the dermis and epidermis; they have a large nucleus & nucleolus, lack intercellular bridges typical of keratinocytes, and occur in small groups157.

Hyperplasia, modified secretory cell, epidermis

Modifiers

• Gland cells

• Goblet/mucous cell

• Sacciform cell,

• Club cell (alarm cell)

• Chloride cell

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Derives from epidermal cells; increased number of modified epidermal-derived cells

Diagnostic Features

• Increased numbers of epidermal gland cells

• Cells may develop/accumulate in the basal/mid layers, or in some cases near the skin surface

• May be associated with epidermal cell hyperplasia

• May be associated with secretory cell hypertrophy or hyperplasia

• Mitotic figures are uncommon

Differential Diagnoses

• Papilloma: Thickened epidermis with exophytic/papilliform growth, well differentiated

Comments

Modified secretory cells (various types-see Modifiers and introductory comments) are highly adaptive with various specialized functions; depending on the body region, sex, temperature, feeding regimen, exercise, type of skin insult and disease chronicity they may vary widely in number, cell size, distribution, and composition of secretion105, 137, 165, 174,175,176,177,178. In some cases, abundant mucus is secreted rapidly, which should be taken into account when assessing secretory cell numbers as mucous cells may not be readily apparent due to content loss/discharge146. After discharge, secretory cells are shed from the skin105. In carp exposed to manure-laden water, mucous cells were no longer seen in the skin by day 3, only to re-appear by day 8; this potential window of mucus-production impairment is important to consider137.

In general, situations that lead to epidermal hyperplasia can also cause gland cell hyperplasia, including hormones, changes in water parameters, chronic parasitism, etc2, 8. These findings can be combined under the finding of epidermal hyperplasia with details narrated in the report or finding comment. Cortisol treated rainbow trout exhibited increased filament cell and secretory cell turnover, with increased differentiation of mucous cells12.

Exposure of carp to acidified water and cadmium led to increased numbers of chloride cells, which were absent in controls137, 162.

Exposure of fish to cadmium led to reduced mucous/goblet cell numbers and changes in mucus composition; this effect is seen with other toxicants/heavy metals and certain parasites15, 137, 154, 162, 179, 180.

Epidermis – Proliferative Neoplastic

Papilloma (B), epidermis

(Figs. 7.13, 7.14, and 7.15)

Fig. 7.13.

Fig. 7.13.

Koi. Skin. Papilloma, epidermis (lip), demonstrating interdigitating folds on fine stroma. H&E, 40×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.14.

Fig. 7.14.

Koi. Skin. Papilloma, epidermis (lip), with atypia and edema, epidermis, intercellular (higher magnification of Fig. 7.13). H&E, 200×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.15.

Fig. 7.15.

Koi. Skin. Papilloma, epidermis (lip), with atypia, epithelial cell. H&E, 400×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Other Terms

• Epithelioma

• Angioepithelial nodule/polyp

• Cauliflower disease

Modifiers

• Exophytic

• Endophytic

• With cellular atypia

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Proliferative, exophytic mass derived from epidermal cells; generally induced by naturally-occurring and/or exogenous toxins but generally considered not viral-associated in fish

Diagnostic Features

• Well circumscribed papilliform exophytic or endophytic mass without a capsule

• Composed of epidermal cells on a well vascularized stroma

• Atypia or an increased nucleus-cytoplasm ratio is evident

• A minority of cells may be multinucleate or karyomegalic

• Mitotic figures may be common, but not necessarily so

• Interdigitating dermal cores/folds are characteristic

• Specialized secretory cells may be present in abundance

• Fluid filled cysts or cavities may develop in areas of necrosis

• Ulceration, inflammation (esp lymphocytes), entrapped scales (complete or partial), mineral, and bone (metaplasia) may be seen

• Entrapped teeth may be seen near the surface of lip lesions

• Melanocytes may be abundant in the epidermis and stroma

• Marked angiomatous or stromal proliferation may be evident

• Exophytic: a more or less distinct stalk at the base

• Endophytic: no evidence of a stalk; the mass is continuous with the epidermis and possibly craterous invagination

• Tumor stroma is distinct from the dermis

Differential Diagnoses

• Hyperplasia, epidermis: Thickened epidermis generally without atypia, may form a distinct plaque; without formation of a papilliform mass or distinct dermal folding/interaction (see Comments)

• Lymphocystis (nodules formed by enlarged fibroblasts that contain iridovirus inclusions)

• Carcinoma: Invasive growth through basal lamina, increased mitotic figures and atypia.

• Infection with Gadixcellia and Xcellia parasites: Xenomas composed of large pleomorphic epithelioid protozoans (see gill chapter)

• Dental neoplasms: Cells produce dental hard tissues which are unequivocally neoplastic

• Fibrosis/fibroplasia: scar/repair tissue lined by normal to hyperplastic epidermis

• Fibroma: a spindle cell neoplasm that may be lined by hyperplastic epidermis

• Melanoma: melanocyte forming neoplasm

• Nuptial (or breeding) tubercles in male fathead minnows (faces of male fathead minnows) – see atrophy or increased

Comments

Papillomas are the most common skin neoplasms and vary from slightly raised to bulging, smooth to verrucose, tan to red, and sessile to pedunculated8, 181. In most reported cases, keratinocytes predominate, however, ethylnitrosurea treated zebrafish developed papillomas with admixtures of keratinocytes, mucous cells, and club cells182. They have been reported in response to chronic toxin exposure where hyperplasia was an early change161, 164. Virus infections have also been implicated in papillomata with seasonal variation10, 168, 183,184,185,186. Papillomas on the face of eels in Northern Europe are a well-known entity; lesions are markedly affected by salinity187. Those associated with salmon are notable in that they are shed, or resolve in association with seasons but can present with anaplasia and bizarre mitoses188,189,190.

In some ulcerative or traumatic lesions free-floating dermal fibers may become re-epithelialized to form a papilliform non-neoplastic mass14, 191.

In masses associated with the lips or fins, complex infoldings or continuity with the dental lamina may present with pseudoglandular formations and mineralized concretions192,193,194,195. During tumor development the associated vasculature may become markedly hyperplastic and atypical157, 196.

It is also important to be aware that when perusing the literature “X cells”, recently verified to be xenoma-forming protists (Xcellia spp. and Gadixcellia spp.), have been described in association with epidermal tumors in various species156. X cells may be present in the dermis and epidermis, increasing in size and number along with tumor development; they have a large nucleus & nucleolus, lack intercellular bridges typical of keratinocytes, and occur in small groups157.

Carcinoma (M), epidermis

Other Terms

• Epidermoid carcinoma

• Epithelioma

Modifiers

• Well-differentiated

• Poorly-differentiated

• Squamous cell

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Neoplastic mass derived from epidermal cells

Diagnostic Features

• Poorly demarcated mass

• A desmoplastic reaction is evident

• Cells are arranged in islands/cords that invade the basal lamina, extending into the dermis or deeper

• Pearl-like formations (concentrically packed cells) may be evident, but keratin cores are exceptional/not formed

• Cells are polygonal to pleomorphic with anisokaryosis, prominent nucleoli, and increased mitoses

• Ulcers, necrosis, and inflammation are common

• Fluid filled cysts or cavities may develop in areas of necrosis

• A glandular appearance may develop from complex infoldings, necrosis, or entrapment of secretory cells

• Some tumors may contain entrapped secretory cells, entrapped teeth near the surface of lip lesions, fragments of scales, mineral, or bone

• Tumor emboli, metastasis may be present, but they are exceptional

• Well differentiated characterized by mild atypica, keratinocyte features are readily evident and/or confluent growth/loss of papilliform arrangement

• Poorly differentiated characterized by cells in many areas do not readily resemble keratinocytes, due to atypia, pleomorphism, spindle cell morphology

Differential Diagnoses

• Papilloma: Thickened epidermis with exophytic/papilliform growth, well differentiated; evidence of invasion is lacking

• Dental neoplasms: Cells produce dental hard tissues which are unequivocally neoplastic

• Infection with Gadixcellia and Xcellia parasites: Xenomas composed of large pleomorphic epithelioid protozoans (see gill chapter)

• Lymphocystis (nodules formed by enlarged fibroblasts that contain iridovirus inclusions)

• Chromatophore tumors- see entry under dermis/subcutis

Comments

Carcinomas may originate from papillomas as part of a progressive change, from many proposed etiologies164,190. They have been reported from various species186, 196,197,198,199,200. In normal fish epidermis the most mitotically active cells are in the more basal layers, but with cancerous change the outermost layers become the most active201. In the brown bullhead, a distinctive hyperemic pattern developed prior to epidermal hyperplasia, which developed into metastatic carcinomas8, 202.

It is also important to be aware that when perusing the literature “X cells”, recently verified to be xenoma-forming protists (Xcellia spp. and Gadixcellia spp.), have been described in association with epidermal tumors in various species and may appear to be anaplastic epidermal cells156. X cells may be present in the dermis and epidermis, increasing in size and number along with tumor development; they have a large nucleus & nucleolus, lack intercellular bridges typical of keratinocytes, and occur in small groups157.

Non-proliferative lesions in the dermis/subcutis/adipose/muscle such as inflammation, necrosis, fibrosis, metaplasia, mineralization etc are all described in the soft tissue chapter. For other changes associated with scales which are applicable to bony tissues, please consult the ‘musculoskeletal’ chapter for terminology.

III. Microscopic Findings – Dermis and Subcutis, Integument

Table 2 shows nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and differential diagnosis of dermis and subcutis.

Table 2. Nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and differential diagnosis of dermis and subcutis.

Dermis & Subcutis Common Uncommon Not observed, but potentially relevant Not applicable
Non-proliferative
*Atrophy X

*Chromatophores, decreased X

*Edema X

*Increased cellularity, Pigmented macrophage aggregates X

*Malformation/dysplasia, scale X

*Parasite X

Proliferative
Non-neoplastic
*Cytomegaly, stromal cell X

*Hyperplasia, chromatophore, melanosis X

Neoplastic

*Chromatophoroma, benign X

*Chromatophoroma, malignant X

*Melanoma, benign X

*Melanoma, malignant X

*Lepidosarcoma/malignant scale neoplasm X

*Terminology with diagnostic criteria or comments described in the main text.

Dermis and Subcutis – Non-Proliferative

Atrophy, dermis or scale, dermis and/or subcutis

(Fig. 7.16)

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Reduced metabolic activity of dermal fibroblasts or scleroblasts (scales), or increased osteoclast activity

Diagnostic Features

• Loss of collagen fibers and extracellular matrix

• Fibroblasts or scleroblasts are smaller and more ovoid

• Osteoclasts may be present

• Inflammation may be present

Differential Diagnoses

• Edema, dermal: separation of collagen fibers by clear fluid or pale amorphous/granular substance

• Necrosis: loss of cell detail and nuclei

Comments

Scales may be resorbed preferentially as a source of calcium and would be expected to affect many and possibly all scales; pattern loss may preferentially affect scales above the lateral line203. Fish utilize scale minerals preferentially for physiologic mobilization, which may occur in calcium-poor water, with exposure to 17-beta estradiol, glucocorticoid exposure, during starvation, and during vitellogenesis72, 204.

Scale resorption in precocious salmon parr begins on the posterolateral margins and progresses anteriorly205, 206. Alternatively, resorption has been reported to occur at or near the scale focus72, 203. As mentioned in the musculoskeletal chapter, fish can remove mineral from bone without removing the collagenous matrix (halastasis) and thus, true measure of mineral mobilization cannot strictly rely on evidence of osteoclastic resorption.

Regional scale loss can be associated with dermal inflammation or dermal atrophy secondary to space occupying masses207. Pollutant exposure is associated with scale breaks and abnormal scale formation208, 209. Scale resorption as a consequence of increased osteoclast activity has been reported in an obesity model in zebrafish210.

Loss of scale matrix may preferentially affect certain layers (limiting, external, or basal)203, 210,211,212,213. In a scale regeneration study in zebrafish, osteoclasts were only evident on the episquamal surface of the scales, indicating a preferential site for physiologic calcium/phosphate mobilization73.

Chromatophores, decreased, dermis and/or subcutis

Other Terms

• Hypomelanosis

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Loss of pigmented cells in the epidermis or dermis

Diagnostic Features

• Reduced numbers of pigmented cells

• Pigment cells may be necrotic, with karyorrhexis, karyolysis, and dispersion of pigment into the stroma

• Pigment containing macrophages are often increased

• Pigmented materials may be present in the epidermis due to expulsion through the skin

• Chromatophore location, pigmentation, or morphology may also be affected

Differential Diagnoses

• Edema: Excessive fluid in/between epidermal cells or soft tissue components

• Epidermal hyperplasia: Increased numbers of epidermal cells

• Increased mucus production

Comments

Chromatophore numbers in fish are a result of a balance between differentiation of the resident chromatoblasts and apoptosis of cells94, 214, 215. Such changes may be a manifestation of “morphological color change”96. Changes in environmental color can induce apoptosis/necrosis of melanocytes and leucophores in medaka skin216. Macrophages and epidermal cells can ingest chromatophore fragments and facilitate elimination through the epidermis112, 216. In flatfish hypomelanosis has been associated with inadequate nutrition or light exposure, a condition noted in other species2,111. A recent study described various chromatophore changes in zebrafish skin when exposed to various compounds relevant to toxicologic studies; chromatophore numbers, location, pigmentation, and morphology were noted128.

Edema, dermis and/or subcutis

(Figs. 7.17 and 7.18)

Fig. 7.17.

Fig. 7.17.

Zebrafish. Skin. Edema (protein rich), scale pocket, with hemorrhage. H&E, 100×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.18.

Fig. 7.18.

Goldfish. Skin. Dermis, edema. H&E, 200×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Other Terms

• Lepidorthosis

Modifiers

• Dermal

• Scale pocket

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Accumulation of interstitial fluid

Diagnostic Features

• Separation of collagen fibers and displacement of scales by clear fluid or pale amorphous/granular fluid

Differential Diagnoses

• Atrophy, dermal: Loss of both collagen fibers and extracellular matrix

Comments

Edema often accompanies dermal inflammation and ulceration159, 207. Generalized hypoalbuminemia can also cause dermal edema.

Increased cellularity, pigmented macrophage aggregates, dermis and/or subcutis

(Fig. 7.19)

Fig. 7.19.

Fig. 7.19.

Channel catfish. Skin. Increased cellularity, pigmented macrophage aggregates and infiltrate, mononuclear cell. H&E, 400×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Other Terms

• Macrophage aggregates

• Increased pigmented macrophages

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Macrophages accumulated in dermis or subcutis containing a variety of pigment

Diagnostic Features

• Accumulation of pigmented round cells within the dermis or epidermis, which lack convincing features of chromatophores

• Pigment granules may be clumped or irregular, and a mixture of chromatosomes may be evident

• Often associated with skin inflammation or alterations in chromatophore numbers

Differential Diagnoses

• Chromatophores, hyperplasia/melanosis: A non-neoplastic, non-tumorous accumulation of well differentiated pigmented cells in dermis

• Melanoma/chromatophoroma, benign

• Melanoma/chromatophoroma, malignant

Comments

A result of altered chromatophore numbers, chromatophore injury, or chromatophore neoplasia is the escape of chromatosomes into the tissues. Macrophages accumulate this pigment and may form loose aggregates, more discrete nodules, exit through the epidermis, or possibly circulate to other organs where melanomacrophage centers occur217. Non-specific injury to the skin may lead to pigment dispersion and increased numbers of macrophages filled with pigment in the epidermis105, 137.

Malformation/dysplasia, scale, dermis and/or subcutis

(Fig. 7.20)

Fig. 7.20.

Fig. 7.20.

Betta splendens. Dermis. Dysplasia, scale, in association with chromatophoroma. Melanin bleach, 100×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Scleroblasts

• Alteration in typical morphology as a result of trauma or other impact on typical development

Diagnostic Features

• Scales that distinctly vary in shape/size relative to normal scales

• Scleroblasts may be hyperplastic

• Altered scale matrix production or mineralization

• Osteoclasts/scleroclasts may be evident

Differential Diagnoses

• Decreased scale matrix or mineral (Decreased bone, trabeculae, cortex, or mineral): reduced quantity of scale matrix or mineral, which may include increased osteoclasts and eroded surfaces

Comments

Trauma to the scale pocket as a result of loss or inflammation can lead to abnormal scale growth or regeneration. Glucocorticoid exposure to zebrafish resulted in malformed and fused scales205.

Parasite, dermis and/or subcutis

(Figs. 7.21, 7.22, 7.23,7.24 and 7.25)

Fig. 7.21.

Fig. 7.21.

Zebrafish. Subcutis of vent. Algae. H&E, 200×. Image courtesy of Jan Spitsbergen.

Fig. 7.22.

Fig. 7.22.

Zebrafish. Subcutis of vent. Algae (higher magnification of Fig. 7.21). H&E. 400×. Image courtesy of Jan Spitsbergen.

Fig. 7.23.

Fig. 7.23.

Crappie. Dermis (fin). Cytomegaly, stromal cell, due to lymphocystis. H&E, 20×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.24.

Fig. 7.24.

Crappie. Dermis (fin). Cytomegaly, stromal cell, due to lymphocystis (higher magnification of Fig. 7.23). H&E, 100×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.25.

Fig. 7.25.

Bluegill. Dermis. Cytomegaly, stromal cell, due to lymphocystis. H&E.

Dermis and Subcutis –Proliferative Non-Neoplastic

Proliferative lesions in the dermis/subcutis/adipose/muscle are described in the soft tissue chapter (Chapter 13).

Cytomegaly, stromal cell, dermis and subcutis

(Figs. 7.26, 7.27, and 7.28)

Fig. 7.26.

Fig. 7.26.

Betta splendens. Dermis/subcutis. Chromatophoroma, benign, mixed, iridophore and melanocyte. H&E, 400×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.27.

Fig. 7.27.

Betta splendens. Dermis/subcutis. Chromatophoroma, benign, mixed, iridophore and melanocyte under polarized light to accentuate iridophores. H&E, 400×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Fig. 7.28.

Fig. 7.28.

Koi. Dermis. Melanoma, benign. H&E, 100×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Other Terms

• Lymphocystis

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Extraordinary fibroblast hypertrophy associated with iridovirus (Lymphocystivirus) infection

Diagnostic Features

• Megalocytic fibroblasts (up to 2 mm wide) forming exophytic clusters in the dermis

• Karyomegaly with abundant basophilic cytoplasmic inclusion material (lacy, corded, or globular)

• Cells are surrounded by a 5–20 micron thick hyaline capsule

• Cell necrosis occurs, with subsequent inflammation and fibrosis

• Possible retention of hyaline capsules, occasionally with mineralization/ossification

Differential Diagnoses

• Papilloma: Thickened epidermis with exophytic/papilliform growth, well differentiated; evidence of invasion is lacking

• Infection with Gadixcellia and Xcellia parasites: Xenomas composed of large pleomorphic epithelioid protozoans (see respiratory chapter)

• Encysted metazoan parasite – fibroplasia with or without inflammation, encircling a parasite

• Myxozoan or microsporidian cysts - thin-walled cysts/cells filled with monomorphic protozoans

Comments

Lymphocystis disease is an old, well described viral infection that occurs in many fish species218,219,220,221,222. The virus infects mesenchymal cells throughout the skin and fins, and less commonly other organs (including mouth, gastrointestinal tract, heart, kidney, mesentery, spleen, liver, and ovary)223. Each infected cell enlarges up to 2 mm wide, forming botryoid nodules and coalescent proliferative lesions. Cells become apparent as soon as 5 days post-infection, and eventually slough172. Macroscopically, the epidermal proliferation associated with Icthyophthirius multifilis or Cryptocaryon irritans infections may be mistaken for lymphocystis224.

Hyperplasia, chromatophore, dermis and subcutis

Other Terms

• Hypermelanosis

• Hyperpigmentation

• Malpigmentation

• Black pigmented lesions

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Chromatophores

Diagnostic Features

• Accumulation of pigmented cells, individually or in clusters, in the dermis or epidermis

• Melanocytes may exhibit marked cytoplasmic extension/spindle conformation

• Lesions may be raised (associated with epidermal hyperplasia) or flat

• Often associated with inflammation or parasite encystment

Differential Diagnoses

• Increased cellularity, Pigmented macrophages

• Chromatophoroma/melanoma: Dense nodular proliferation of neoplastic pigmented cells that exhibit atypia, vacuolation, spindle shapes

• Parasite-related granuloma (trematodes, Ichthyophonus)

• Papilloma with increased melanocytes

Comments

Chromatophore numbers in fish are a result of a balance between resident chromatoblast differentiation (leading to increased numbers) and apoptosis, both of which are largely regulated by hormones114. Melanocyte numbers in fish increase due to maturation of precursor cells, not by division of mature cells214. On the other hand, xanthophores and iridophores maintain the ability to proliferate and spread as fully mature cells95. Such changes may be a manifestation of “morphological color change”96. In zebrafish models of inflammation, melanoblasts appear within 3 hours, and melanocytes can appear as soon as 18 hours post injury225. Hyperplasia of melanocytes and/or iridophores, without apparent infectious cause, has been reported in wild bullhead and dab8, 226.

Darkening of the skin is a non-specific change in fish caused by melanosome dispersion or increased chromatophore numbers; it is associated with asphyxia, spinal disease, ophthalmic impairment, social interactions, water quality issues, disease, other sources of stress, and aging2, 6, 12, 105.

Pigmented spots are reported to develop in various species and like chromatophore neoplasia, they may be associated with chemical, UV radiation, or even viral exposure8, 227.

Dermis and Subcutis – Proliferative Neoplastic

Neoplasms in the dermis & subcutis that derive from mesenchymal cells (except scales) are all described in the soft tissue chapter. Scale neoplasms are described below. Neoplasms originating from nervous tissue (nerve sheath tumor), vascular tissue (hemangioma, hemangiosarcoma), and lymphoid tissue (lymphosarcoma) are all described in the corresponding chapters of this publication. Chromatophores, including melanocytes, predominantly reside in the dermis, and neoplasms of these cells are described herein.

Chromatophoroma, benign (B), dermis and/or subcutis

(Figs. 7.20, 7.26 and 7.27)

Modifiers

• Mixed type

• Mosaic type

Other Terms

• Chromatoblastoma

• Iridophoroma

• Guanophoroma

• Erythrocytoma

• Xanthocytoma

• Leucocytoma

• Cyanophoroma

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Chromatophores; pigmented cells from the neural crest, including melanocytes, xanthophores, iridophores, erythrophores, leucophores, and mixed/mosaic cell types

Diagnostic Features

• Dense nodular proliferation in the dermis, with or without association towards the epidermis

• Tumor cells are polygonal, spindled, or epithelioid with variable degrees of cytoplasmic pigment production, which may include pteridine, purine, melanin, and carotenoid derivatives

• Cells may palisade similar to that in schwannomas/nerve sheath tumors

• Pigment granules are usually present to variable degrees

• Mitoses and nuclear atypia are not prominent

• Pigment laden macrophages or non-neoplastic melanocytes may also be present

• Mixed type: More than one well differentiated neoplastic chromatophore cell type is present, each in abundance; mosaic cells may be a minor component

• Mosaic type: The majority of the neoplastic cells produce an abundance of more than one pigment type which is inconsistent with normal organelle differentiation in that cell population

Differential Diagnoses

• Melanoma, benign: Non-invasive, fewer mitoses, well differentiated, cells produce only melanin

• Chromatophoroma, malignant: Invasive or metastatic, increased mitoses and nuclear atypia

• Lipogranulomatous inflammation: pigment laden macrophages, multinucleated giant cells, pigment is histochemically consistent with ceroid/lipofuscin

Comments

Neoplasms of pigment cells have been reported in many species and have been given a wide variety of names, depending on color (e.g. erythrocytoma) or pigment chemistry (e.g. pterinophoromas). Classically the color of the tumor, and therefore the diagnosis, is determined by their natural appearance in vivo; this is problematic since different chromatophore types can exhibit similar colors by different means (see introductory comments). Definitive characterization may require in vivo color documentation, pigment compound analysis, and ultramicroscopy.

Chromatophores naturally have an affinity for one another, and it should not be surprising to find, in addition to a neoplastic chromatophore population, a population of non-neoplastic chromatophores in or around the mass; this is admittedly problematic when trying to discriminate mixed-type tumors. Non-neoplastic chromatophores should be well differentiated and lack atypia or alteration in pigment organelle abundance/morphology.

In mixed tumors, well differentiated chromatophores of more than one type are present and tend to congregate with one another. On the other hand, the presence of many poorly differentiated chromatophores with an abnormal mixture of pigment organelles is supportive of a mosaic tumor. The occurrence of mosaic cells (chromatophores producing more than one pigment type) has been diagnosed in reptile chromatophoromas; this is consistent with the understanding that chromatophore types originate from common stem cells, and when neoplastic may acquire the ability to produce variable pigment types.

Chromatophores are known to exhibit short and long range interactions, leading to attraction and repulsion of certain cell types94; this tendency may be manifested in the propensity for certain chromatophore types to aggregate within masses. Mixed chromatophoromas have been named according to pigment involved (irido-melanophoroma, etc.)228. The term ‘chromatoblastoma’ was coined to emphasize the common cell origin. Neither of these nomenclatures are preferred. A benign mixed tumor of iridophores and melanocytes is best diagnosed as: chromatophoroma, benign, mixed, iridophore and melanocyte. See additional references of interest122, 229,230,231,232.

Chromatophoroma, malignant (M), dermis and/or subcutis

Modifiers

• Mixed type

• Mosaic type

Other Terms

• Malignant chromatoblastoma

• Malignant iridophoroma

• Malignant guanophoroma

• Malignant erythrocytoma

• Malignant xanthocytoma

• Malignant leucocytoma

• Malignant cyanophoroma

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Malignant neoplastic proliferation of chromatophores, which are pigmented cells from the neural crest

Diagnostic Features

• Dense nodular proliferation in the dermis, with or without association towards the epidermis

• Invasion or metastasis may be evident

• Tumor cells are polygonal, spindled, or epithelioid with variable degrees of cytoplasmic pigment production, which may include pteridine, purine, or carotenoid derivatives

• Pigment granules are usually present to variable degrees

• Cells may palisade similar to that in schwannomas

• Mitoses and nuclear atypia are increased

• Multinucleate cells may be present

• Pigment laden macrophages or non-neoplastic melanocytes may also be present

• Mixed type: More than one neoplastic chromatophore cell type is present

• Mosaic type: The neoplastic cell population produces more than one pigment type within the cells

Differential Diagnoses

• Melanoma, malignant: Poorly differentiated cells that produce only melanin

• Chromatophoroma, benign: Expansile, well differentiated cells, minimal mitoses or nuclear atypia

• Fibrosarcoma: Fibroblastic cells that lack pigment and form dense fascicles

• Schwannoma: Spindle cell neoplasm with storiform arrays, distinct whorling, Verocay bodies, and exhibit immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of nerve sheath cells

Comments

Neoplasms of pigment cells have been reported in many species and have been given a wide variety of names, depending on color (e.g. erythrocytoma) or pigment chemistry (e.g. pterinophoromas). Classically the color of the tumor, and therefore the diagnosis, is determined by their natural appearance in vivo; this is problematic since different chromatophore types can exhibit similar colors by different means (see introductory comments). Definitive characterization may require in vivo color documentation, pigment compound analysis, and ultramicroscopy.

Chromatophores naturally have an affinity for one another, and it should not be surprising to find, in addition to a neoplastic chromatophore population, a population of non-neoplastic chromatophores in or around the mass; this is admittedly problematic when trying to discriminate mixed-type tumors. Non-neoplastic chromatophores should be well differentiated and lack atypia or alteration in pigment organelle abundance/morphology.

In mixed tumors, well differentiated chromatophores of more than one type are present and tend to congregate with one another. On the other hand, the presence of many poorly differentiated chromatophores with an abnormal mixture of pigment organelles is supportive of a mosaic tumor. The occurrence of mosaic cells (chromatophores producing more than one pigment type) has been diagnosed in reptile chromatophoromas; this is consistent with the understanding that chromatophore types originate from common stem cells, and when neoplastic may acquire the ability to produce variable pigment types.

Malignant chromatophoromas with metastases have been reported, albeit rarely233. Interestingly, the development of melanomas within existing chromatophoromas has been reported in Xiphiphorus hybrids, a well-known melanoma model234, 235.

Chromatophores are known to exhibit short- and long-range interactions, leading to attraction and repulsion of certain cell types94; this tendency may be manifested in the propensity for chromatophore types to aggregate within masses. Mixed chromatophoromas have been named according to pigment involved (irido-melanophoroma, etc.)228. The term ‘chromatoblastoma’ was coined to emphasize the common cell origin. Neither of these nomenclatures are preferred. A malignant mixed tumor of iridophores and melanocytes is best diagnosed as: chromatophoroma, malignant, mixed, iridophore and melanocyte. See additional references of interest122, 229,230,231,232.

Melanoma, benign (B), dermis and/or subcutis

(Figs. 7.28 and 7.29)

Fig. 7.29.

Fig. 7.29.

Koi. Skin. Melanoma, benign. H&E, 400×. Image courtesy of Wes Baumgartner.

Other Terms

• Melanocytoma

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Melanocytes; neuroectodermal cells from the neural crest

Diagnostic Features

• Dense nodular proliferation in the dermis, with or without association towards the epidermis

• Tumor cells are dendritic, polygonal, spindled, or epithelioid with variable degrees of melanin pigmentation

• Very large cells (macromelanocytes) may be abundant

• Cells may palisade similar to those in schwannomas/nerve sheath tumors

• Dark brown/black pigment granules are usually present in abundance

• Pigment laden macrophages may also be present

• They may be multicentric

• Amelanotic type: tumor cells do not contain pigment granules that can be identified by H&E standard light microscopy

Differential Diagnoses

• Hyperplasia, chromatophore: well differentiated cells, abundant pigment, no atypia

• Melanoma, malignant: Invasive growth, higher mitotic activity, metastasis

• Chromatophoroma: Alternate or additional pigment types present in neoplastic cells

• Fibrosarcoma: Fibroblastic cells that lack pigment and form dense fascicles

• Schwannoma/nerve sheath tumor: Spindle cell neoplasm with storiform arrays, distinct whorling, Verocay bodies, and immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of nerve sheath cells

Comments

Xiphiphorus spp. (platyfish/swordtail crosses) have been used to study melanomas extensively; neoplasms in this species can arise spontaneously, by UV exposure or chemical agents236. Xiphiphorus have two mature melanocyte types, micromelanocytes and macromelanocytes which are terminally differentiated. A grading scheme has been published237,238,239. A hybrid Xiphiphorus strain developed concurrent melanoma and chromatophoroma, and in some cases the former neoplasm invaded and partially replaced the latter235. Poorly melanized tumors may occur as a result of reduced melanosome production240, however the presence of additional pigment organelles should be considered (mosaic chromatophores) and may alter the diagnosis.

Several melanocyte selective antibodies have been used to delineate melanotic lesions. HMB-45 and Melan-A are associated with melanocyte activation (premelanosomal membranes), while tyrosinase is involved in melanin production. S-100 is highly sensitive but relatively non-specific, yet remains a valuable stain as it will detect most melanocytic cells. The utility of these stains in other chromatophore tumors is poorly understood241.

Chromatophore neoplasia may be associated with chemical, UV radiation, or even viral exposure; epizootics have been reported8, 227.

Melanoma, malignant (M), dermis and/or subcutis

Modifiers

• Amelanotic type

Other Terms

• Melanosarcoma

• Melanocytic tumor

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Malignant neoplastic proliferation of melanocytes which are neuroectodermal cells derived from the neural crest

Diagnostic Features

• Dense nodular proliferation in the dermis, with or without association towards the epidermis

• Tumor cells are polygonal, spindled, or epithelioid with variable degrees of melanin pigmentation

• There is invasive growth or metastasis

• Necrosis may be present

• Cells may palisade similar to that in schwannomas

• Dark brown/black pigment granules are usually present to variable degrees

• May show frequent mitoses and nuclear atypia

• Very large cells (macromelanocytes) may be abundant

• They may be multicentric

• Inflammation may be present

• Amelanotic type: Tumor cells do not contain pigment granules that can be identified by H&E standard light microscopy

Special techniques for diagnosis

• Histochemistry: Masson-Fontana stain for melanosome detection

• Transmission electron microscopy: demonstration of melanosomes

• Immunohistochemistry: staining for Melan-A (MART1), HMB-45, S-100, tyrosinase

Differential Diagnoses

• Hyperplasia, chromatophore: non-tumorous, well differentiated cells, abundant pigment, little or no atypia

• Melanoma, benign: Non-invasive, fewer mitoses, well differentiated

• Chromatophoroma, malignant: Alternate or additional pigment types present in neoplastic cells

• Fibrosarcoma: Fibroblastic cells that lack pigment and form dense fascicles

• Schwannoma/nerve sheath tumor: Spindle cell neoplasm with storiform arrays, distinct whorling, Verocay bodies, and immunohistochemical and ultrastructural features of nerve sheath cells

Comments

Xiphiphorus spp. (platyfish/swordtail crosses) have been used to study melanomas extensively; neoplasms in these fish can arise spontaneously, by UV exposure or chemical agents236. Xiphiphorus have two mature melanocyte types, micromelanocytes and macromelanocytes which are terminally differentiated. A grading scheme has been published237,238,239. Tumor development is attributed to the activity of a dominant-acting sex-linked oncogene, Xmrk, an ortholog of human EGFR gene. It appears that full expression of Xmrk occurs when it is no longer inhibited by the suppressor gene Diff. A hybrid Xiphiphorus strain developed concurrent melanoma and chromatophoroma, and in some cases the former neoplasm invaded and partially replaced the latter235. Poorly melanized tumors may occur as a result of reduced melanosome production240, however the presence of additional pigment organelles should be considered (mosaic chromatophores) and may alter the diagnosis.

Several melanocyte selective antibodies have been used to delineate melanotic lesions. HMB-45 and Melan-A are associated with melanocyte activation (premelanosomal membranes), while tyrosinase is involved in melanin production. S-100 is highly sensitive but relatively non-specific yet remains a valuable stain as it will detect most melanocytic cells. The utility of these stains in other chromatophore tumors is poorly understood241.

Chromatophore neoplasia may be associated with chemical, UV radiation, or even viral exposure; epizootics have been reported8, 227.

Lepidosarcoma, dermis and/or subcutis

(Fig. 7.30)

Fig. 7.30.

Fig. 7.30.

Medaka. Skin. Lepidosarcoma. H&E. Image courtesy of Jeffrey Wolf.

Other Terms

• Scale osteosarcoma

• Scale osteoma

• Lepidoma

• Lepidocytoma

Pathogenesis/Cell of Origin

• Derives from scale-forming cells

Diagnostic Features

• Mesenchymal cells are variably differentiated, polygonal to spindled

• Cells are arranged in fascicles and storiform arrays

• Cell clusters around small scale spicules may be prominent or appear as multinucleate cells

• Mitoses are variable from rare to frequent

• Atypia may be marked but is variable.

• Scale hard tissues may or may not be abundant; osteoid may predominate

• More than one tumor may be present

Differential Diagnoses

• Lepidocytoma: Benign scale forming neoplasm

• Malformation/dysplasia, scale: Abnormal scale developing from non-neoplastic cells

• Nodular reactive bone: Non-neoplastic proliferation of well differentiated irregular bone

• Fibrosarcoma: Fibroblast neoplasm with entrapped or metaplastic bone matrix

• Osteosarcoma: Malignant osteoblast tumor producing bone, lacking scale or dental hard tissues

• Odontogenic neoplasm: Mesenchymal neoplasm producing dental hard tissues

• Lymphocystis: Non-neoplastic cytomegalic transformation of virus infected fibroblasts rimmed by hyaline capsules

• Osteochondroma: Benign mesenchymal neoplasm with bone and cartilage admixed

Comments

Neoplasms that arise from the scale may develop hard tissues resembling bone or dental elements; they are rare. Special histochemical staining of large matrix foci may reveal layering consistent with scale development242.

Tumors described in the literature as lepidocytomas (preferred terminology lepidosarcomas) occurred in medaka exposed to MNNG; the amount of scale matrix varied considerably243. In some cases, cells exhibit marked anaplasia with a high mitotic count.

Macroscopically, lepidosarcoma must be differentiated from the walleye dermal sarcoma, which is a benign, multifocal seasonal neoplasm associated with a retrovirus; neoplastic cells arise from superficial scale surfaces and can produce bony matrices168, 244, 245.

The bone surrounding the lateral line canals (canal tubes) is distinct from the scale matrix; bone producing neoplasms arising in the skin may therefore develop from the tissues that produce scales or canal tubes, lepidosarcomas or canal osteosarcomas, respectively.

Scleroblasts/scale forming cells, similar to endoskeletal osteoblasts have desmosome connections246.

Footnotes

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/>.

References

  • 1.Glover CN, Bucking C, and Wood CM. The skin of fish as a transport epithelium: a review. J Comp Physiol B. 183: 877–891. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Groff JM. Cutaneous biology and diseases of fish. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 4: 321–411, v–vi. 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Whitear M. Epidermis. In: Biology of the Integument 2 Vertebrates, J Bereiter-Hahn, AG Matoltsky and KS Richards (eds). Springer-Verlag, 8–38. 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.McKim J, and Lien G. Toxic responses of the skin. In: Target Organ Toxicity in Marine and Freshwater Teleosts, D Schlenk and W Benson (eds). Taylor & Francis, New York. 151–223. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sveen LR, Timmerhaus G, Torgersen JS, Ytteborg E, Jørgensen SM, Handeland S, Stefansson SO, Nilsen TO, Calabrese S, Ebbesson L, Terjesen BF, and Takle H. Impact of fish density and specific water flow on skin properties in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) post-smolts. Aquaculture. 464: 629–637. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Iger Y, and Abraham M. The process of skin healing in experimentally wounded carp. J Fish Biol. 36: 421–437. 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shibata E, Ando K, Murase E, and Kawakami A. Heterogeneous fates and dynamic rearrangement of regenerative epidermis-derived cells during Zebrafish fin regeneration. Development (Cambridge). 145. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Blazer VS, Fournie JW, Wolf JC, and Wolfe MJ. Manual for the Microscopic Diagnosis of Proliferative Liver and Skin Lesions in the Brown Bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus). 2007, from PS Grant website.
  • 9.Ferguson HW. Skin. In: Systemic Pathology of Fish: a text and atlas of normal tissues in teleosts and their responses in disease, HW Ferguson (ed). Scotian, London. 65–89. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Roberts RJ, and Bullock AM. The dermatology of marine teleost fish. II. Dermatopathology of the integument. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev. 14: 227–246. 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Finn JP, and Nielsen NO. The effect of temperature variation on the inflammatory response of rainbow trout. J Pathol. 105: 257–268. 1971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Iger Y, Balm PHM, Jenner HA, and Wendelaar Bonga SE. Cortisol induces stress-related changes in the skin of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 97: 188–198. 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Daye PG, and Garside ET. Histopathologic changes in surficial tissues of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill), exposed to acute and chronic levels of pH. Can J Zool. 54: 2140–2155. 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Roberts RJ, and Rodger HD. The Pathophysiology and Systematic Pathology of Teleosts. In: Fish Pathology, RJ Roberts (ed). Wiley, 62–143. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Berntssen MHG, Kroglund F, Rosseland BO, and Wendelaar Bonga SE. Responses of skin mucous cells to aluminum exposure at low pH in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) smolts. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 54: 1039–1045. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ceballos-Francisco D, Cordero H, Guardiola FA, Cuesta A, and Esteban MÁ. Healing and mucosal immunity in the skin of experimentally wounded gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 71: 210–219. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fernández-Alacid L, Sanahuja I, Ordóñez-Grande B, Sánchez-Nuño S, Viscor G, Gisbert E, Herrera M, and Ibarz A. Skin mucus metabolites in response to physiological challenges: A valuable non-invasive method to study teleost marine species. Sci Total Environ. 644: 1323–1335. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.McKone CE, Young RG, Bache CA, and Lisk DJ. Rapid uptake of mercuric ion by goldfish. Environ Sci Technol. 5: 1138–1139. 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pickering AD, and Richards RH. Factors influencing the structure, function and biota of the salmonid epidermis. Proc R Soc Edinb. 79B: 93–104. 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Segner H, Marthaler R, and Linnenbach M. Growth, aluminium uptake and mucous cell morphometrics of early life stages of brown trout, Salmo trutta, in low pH water. Environ Biol Fishes. 21: 153–159. 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Varanasi U, Robisch PA, and Malins DC. Structural alterations in fish epidermal mucus produced by water-borne lead and mercury. Nature. 258: 431–432. 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zuchelkowski EM, Clark Lantz R, and Hinton DE. Skin mucous cell response to acid stress in male and female brown bullhead catfish, Ictalurus nebulosus (Lesueur). Aquat Toxicol. 8: 139–148. 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zuchelkowski EM, Lantz RC, and Hinton DE. Effects of acid-stress on epidermal mucous cells of the brown bullhead Ictalurus nebulosus (LeSeur): a morphometric study. Anat Rec. 200: 33–39. 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zuchelkowski EM, Pinkstaff CA, and Hinton DE. Mucosubstance histochemistry in control and acid-stressed epidermis of brown bullhead catfish, Ictalurus nebulosus (LeSueur). Anat Rec. 212: 327–335, 396–398. 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Law M. Differential diagnosis of ulcerative lesions in fish. Environ Health Perspect. 109(Suppl 5): 681–686. 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Udomkusonsri P, Noga EJ, and Monteiro-Riviere NA. Pathogenesis of acute ulceration response (AUR) in hybrid striped bass. Dis Aquat Organ. 61: 199–213. 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bouck GR, and Smith SD. Mortality of experimentally descaled smolts of coho salmon (oncorhynchus kisutch) in fresh and salt water. Trans Am Fish Soc. 108: 67–69. 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Noga EJ. Skin ulcers in fish: Pfiesteria and other etiologies. Toxicol Pathol. 28: 807–823. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Richardson R, Slanchev K, Kraus C, Knyphausen P, Eming S, and Hammerschmidt M. Adult zebrafish as a model system for cutaneous wound-healing research. J Invest Dermatol. 133: 1655–1665. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sveen LR, Timmerhaus G, Krasnov A, Takle H, Handeland S, and Ytteborg E. Wound healing in post-smolt Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Sci Rep. 9: 3565. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.McArdle J, and Bullock AM. Solar ultraviolet radiation as a causal factor of ‘summer syndrome’ in cage‐reared Atlantic salmon, Salmo solar L.: a clinical and histopathological study. J Fish Dis. 10: 255–264. 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guerra RR, Santos NP, Cecarelli P, Silva JRMC, and Hernandez-Blazquez FJ. Healing of skin wounds in the African catfish Clarias gariepinus. J Fish Biol. 73: 572–583. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mittal AK, and Munshi JSD. On the regeneration and repair of superficial wounds in the skin of Rita rita (Ham.) (Bagridae, Pisces). Acta Anat (Basel). 88: 424–442. 1974. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Quilhac A, and Sire JY. Spreading, proliferation, and differentiation of the epidermis after wounding a cichlid fish, Hemichromis bimaculatus. Anat Rec. 254: 435–451. 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Richardson R, Metzger M, Knyphausen P, Ramezani T, Slanchev K, Kraus C, Schmelzer E, and Hammerschmidt M. Re-epithelialization of cutaneous wounds in adult zebrafish combines mechanisms of wound closure in embryonic and adult mammals. Development. 143: 2077–2088. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kabata Z. Crustacea as enemies of fishes. Diseases of Fishes. 1–171. 1970.
  • 37.Bullock AM, and Roberts RJ. The dermatology of marine teleost fish. I. The normal integument. Oceanogr Mar Biol Annu Rev. 13: 383–411. 1974. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Elliott DG. Integumentary System. In: The Laboratory Fish, GK Ostrander (ed). Academic, San Diego. 271–306. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Harris JE, and Hunt S. The fine structure of the epidermis of two species of salmonid fish, the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar l.) and the brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). I. General organization and filament-containing cells. Cell Tissue Res. 157: 553–565. 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jeong GN. A study on the epidermal structure and mucosubstance histochemistry of spotty belly, devil stinger, stone fish, cubed snailfish, and japanese bluefish. Anim Cells Syst (Seoul). 12: 85–91. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Lumsden JS, Ferguson HW, Ostland VE, and Byrne PJ. The mucous coat on gill lamellae of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Cell Tissue Res. 275: 187–193. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Speare DJ, and Mirsalimi SM. Pathology of the mucous coat of trout skin during an erosive bacterial dermatitis: a technical advance in mucous coat stabilization for ultrastructural examination. J Comp Pathol. 106: 201–211. 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Roberts RJ, and Bullock AM. Histochemistry and kinetics of the epidermis of some British teleost fishes. In: The Skin of Vertebrates, RIC Spearman and PA Riley (eds). Academic Press, London. 13–22. 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Henrikson RC, and Matoltsy AG. The fine structure of teleost epidermis. 1. Introduction and filament-containing cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 21: 194–212. 1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Le Guellec D, Morvan-Dubois G, and Sire JY. Skin development in bony fish with particular emphasis on collagen deposition in the dermis of the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Int J Dev Biol. 48: 217–231. 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sire JY, and Huysseune A. Formation of dermal skeletal and dental tissues in fish: a comparative and evolutionary approach. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 78: 219–249. 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Åsbakk K. Elimination of foreign material by epidermal malpighian cells during wound healing in fish skin. J Fish Biol. 58: 953–966. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rasmussen JP, Sack GS, Martin SM, and Sagasti A. Vertebrate epidermal cells are broad-specificity phagocytes that clear sensory axon debris. J Neurosci. 35: 559–570. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Tsai JC. Cell renewal in the epidermis of the loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Cypriniformes). J Zool. 239: 591–599. 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Depasquale JA. Actin Microridges. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 301: 2037–2050. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Pinto CS, Khandekar A, Bhavna R, Kiesel P, Pigino G, and Sonawane M. Microridges are apical epithelial projections formed of F-actin networks that organize the glycan layer. Sci Rep. 9: 12191. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Whitear M. Causative aspects of microridges on the surface of fish epithelia. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 22: 211–220. 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Okada YK, and Yamashita H. Experimental investigation of the manifestation of secondary sexual characters in fish, using the medaka (Oryzias latipes) as material. Jour. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo. 6: 383–437. 1944. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Henrikson RC, and Matoltsy AG. The fine structure of teleost epidermis. II. Mucous cells. J Ultrastruct Res. 21: 213–221. 1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zaccone G, Kapoor BG, Fasulo S, and Ainis L. Structural, Histochemical and Functional Aspects of the Epidermis in Fishes. In: Advances in Marine Biology, AJ Southward, PA Tyler, CM Young and LA Fuiman (eds). 255–348. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pickering AD. Seasonal changes in the epidermis of the brown trout Salmo trutta (L.). J Fish Biol. 10: 561–566. 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Henrikson RC, and Matoltsy AG. The fine structure of teleost epidermis. 3. Club cells and other cell types. J Ultrastruct Res. 21: 222–232. 1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chang WJ, and Hwang PP. Development of zebrafish epidermis. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 93: 205–214. 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hsu HH, Lin LY, Tseng YC, Horng JL, and Hwang PP. A new model for fish ion regulation: identification of ionocytes in freshwater- and seawater-acclimated medaka (Oryzias latipes). Cell Tissue Res. 357: 225–243. 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.O’Brien GS, Rieger S, Wang F, Smolen GA, Gonzalez RE, Buchanan J, and Sagasti A. Coordinate development of skin cells and cutaneous sensory axons in zebrafish. J Comp Neurol. 520: 816–831. 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Esteban MÁ, and Cerezuela R. Fish mucosal immunity: Skin. In: Mucosal Health in Aquaculture, 67–92. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Xu Z, Parra D, Gómez D, Salinas I, Zhang YA, von Gersdorff Jørgensen L, Heinecke RD, Buchmann K, LaPatra S, and Sunyer JO. Teleost skin, an ancient mucosal surface that elicits gut-like immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110: 13097–13102. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhao X, Findly RC, and Dickerson HW. Cutaneous antibody-secreting cells and B cells in a teleost fish. Dev Comp Immunol. 32: 500–508. 2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lin X, Zhou Q, Zhao C, Lin G, Xu J, and Wen Z. An ectoderm-derived myeloid-like cell population functions as antigen transporters for langerhans cells in zebrafish epidermis. Dev Cell. 49: 605–617.e5. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dezfuli BS, Capuano S, Simoni E, Previati M, and Giari L. Rodlet cells and the sensory systems in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Anat Rec (Hoboken). 290: 367–374. 2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Miyashita Y, and Fujik R. Observations of the fine structure of catfish epidermal melanophores with due consideration to their functions. Annot Zool Jpn. 53: 174–181. 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Whitear M, Mittal AK, and Lane EB. Endothelial layers in fish skin. J Fish Biol. 17: 43–65. 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Whitear M. Dermis. In: Biology of the Integument 2 Vertebrates, J Bereiter-Hahn, AG Matoltsky and KS Richards (eds). Springer-Verlag, 39–64. 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sire JY, and Akimenko MA. Scale development in fish: a review, with description of sonic hedgehog (shh) expression in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Int J Dev Biol. 48: 233–247. 2004. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sire JY, Allizard F, Babiar O, Bourguignon J, and Quilhac A. Scale development in zebrafish (Danio rerio). J Anat. 190: 545–561. 1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bereiter-Hahn J, and Zylberberg L. Regeneration of teleost fish scale. Comp Biochem Physiol Part A Physiol. 105: 625–641. 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Metz JR, Leeuwis RHJ, Zethof J, and Flik G. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) in calcium-poor water mobilise calcium and phosphorus from scales. J Appl Ichthyology. 30: 671–677. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.de Vrieze E, Sharif F, Metz JR, Flik G, and Richardson MK. Matrix metalloproteinases in osteoclasts of ontogenetic and regenerating zebrafish scales. Bone. 48: 704–712. 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Metz JR, de Vrieze E, Lock EJ, Schulten IE, and Flik G. Elasmoid scales of fishes as model in biomedical bone research. J Appl Ichthyology. 28: 382–387. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Brown GA, and Wellings SR. Collagen formation and calcification in teleost scales. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 93: 571–582. 1969. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sire JY, and Géraudie J. Fine Structure of the Developing Scale in the Cichlid Hemichromis bimaculatus (Pisces, Teleostei, Perciformes). Acta Zool. 64: 1–8. 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Waterman RE. Fine structure of scale development in the teleost, Brachydanio rerio. Anat Rec. 168: 361–379. 1970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Quilhac A, and Sire JY. Restoration of the subepidermal tissues and scale regeneration after wounding a cichlid fish, Hemichromis bimaculatus. J Exp Zool. 281: 305–327. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Sire JY. The same cell lineage is involved in scale formation and regeneration in the teleost fish Hemichromis bimaculatus. Tissue Cell. 21: 447–462. 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Yamada J, and Watabe N. Studies on fish scale formation and resorption. I. Fine structure and calcification of the scales in Fundulus heteroclitus (Atheriniformes: Cyprinodontidae). J Morphol. 159: 49–65. 1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sire JY, Donoghue PCJ, and Vickaryous MK. Origin and evolution of the integumentary skeleton in non-tetrapod vertebrates. J Anat. 214: 409–440. 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Onozato H, and Watabe N. Studies on fish scale formation and resorption. III. Fine structure and calcification of the fibrillary plates of the scales in Carassius auratus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae). Cell Tissue Res. 201: 409–422. 1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Zylberberg L, and Meunier FJ. Ultrastructural data on the melanophores associated with the cellular elasmoid scales in Leporinus friderici (Teleostei: Ostariophysi, Anastomidae): Their putative participation in scale matrix formation. J Morphol. 228: 155–164. 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sire JY. Evidence that mineralized spherules are involved in the formation of the superficial layer of the elasmoid scale in cichlids Cichlasoma octofasciatum and Hemichromis bimaculatus (Pisces, Teleostei): an epidermal active participation? Cell Tissue Res. 253: 165–172. 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sire JY, Quilhac A, Bourguignon J, and Allizard F. Evidence for participation of the epidermis in the deposition of superficial layer of scales in zebrafish (Danio rerio): A SEM and TEM study. J Morphol. 231: 161–174. 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Huysseune A, and Sire JY. Evolution of patterns and processes in teeth and tooth-related tissues in non-mammalian vertebrates. Eur J Oral Sci. 106(Suppl 1): 437–481. 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Schönbörner AA, Boivin G, and Baud CA. The mineralization processes in teleost fish scales. Cell Tissue Res. 202: 203–212. 1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Schönbörner AA, Meunier FJ, and Castanet J. The fine structure of calcified Mandl’s corpuscles in teleost fish scales. Tissue Cell. 13: 589–597. 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Zylberberg L. The elasmoid scales of teleosts: from structure to bioinspired materials. Cybium. 42: 7–17. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Voronina EP, and Hughes DR. Lateral line scale types and review of their taxonomic distribution. Acta Zool. 99: 65–86. 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Clardy TR, and Hilton EJ. Osteology of the prickleback genus Xiphister (Cottiformes: Zoarcoidei: Stichaeidae). Acta Zool. 97: 211–231. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Olson KR. Circulatory System. In: The Laboratory Fish, GK Ostrander (ed). Academic Press, 369–378. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Cal L, Suarez-Bregua P, Moran P, Cerdá-Reverter JM, and Rotllant J. Fish pigmentation. A key issue for the sustainable development of fish farming. In: Emerging Issues in Fish Larvae Research, 229–252. 2018.
  • 94.Frohnhöfer HG, Krauss J, Maischein HM, and Nüsslein-Volhard C. Iridophores and their interactions with other chromatophores are required for stripe formation in zebrafish. Development. 140: 2997–3007. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Nüsslein-Volhard C, and Singh AP. How fish color their skin: A paradigm for development and evolution of adult patterns: Multipotency, plasticity, and cell competition regulate proliferation and spreading of pigment cells in Zebrafish coloration. BioEssays. 39: 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Schliwa M. Pigment Cells. In: Biology of the Integument 2 Vertebrates, J Bereiter-Hahn, AG Matoltsky and KS Richards (eds). Springer-Verlag, 65–77. 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Sköld HN, Aspengren S, Cheney KL, and Wallin M. International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology. Fish Chromatophores-From Molecular Motors to Animal Behavior. 321: 171–219. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Fujii R. Coloration and Chromatophores. In: Physiology of Fishes, First DH Evans (ed). CRC Press, 535–562. 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Kelsh RN, Harris ML, Colanesi S, and Erickson CA. Stripes and belly-spots -- a review of pigment cell morphogenesis in vertebrates. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 20: 90–104. 2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mort RL, Jackson IJ, and Patton EE. The melanocyte lineage in development and disease. Development. 142: 620–632. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cooper CD. Insights from zebrafish on human pigment cell disease and treatment. Dev Dyn. 246: 889–896. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Kelsh RN, Sosa KC, Owen JP, and Yates CA. Zebrafish adult pigment stem cells are multipotent and form pigment cells by a progressive fate restriction process: Clonal analysis identifies shared origin of all pigment cell types. BioEssays. 39: 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bagnara JT, and Matsumoto J. Comparative Anatomy and Physiology of Pigment Cells in Nonmammalian Tissues. In: The Pigmentary System: Physiology and Pathophysiology, JJ Nordlund, RE Boissy, VJ Hearing, RA King, WS Oetting and J-P Ortonne (eds). Blackwell, 11–59. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Lewis VM, Saunders LM, Larson TA, Bain EJ, Sturiale SL, Gur D, Chowdhury S, Flynn JD, Allen MC, Deheyn DD, Lee JC, Simon JA, Lippincott-Schwartz J, Raible DW, and Parichy DM. Fate plasticity and reprogramming in genetically distinct populations of Danio leucophores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 116: 11806–11811. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Iger Y, Jenner HA, and Bonga SEW. Cellular responses in the skin of the trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to temperature elevation. J Fish Biol. 44: 921–935. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Leclercq E, Taylor JF, and Migaud H. Morphological skin colour changes in teleosts. Fish Fish. 11: 159–193. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Nakajima Y, and Obika M. Growth and maturation of melanosomes in the melanophores of a teleost, Oryzias latipes. Cell Tissue Res. 244: 279–283. 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Turner WA, Jr , Taylor JD, and Tchen TT. Melanosome formation in the goldfish: the role of multivesicular bodies. J Ultrastruct Res. 51: 16–31. 1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Schartl M, Larue L, Goda M, Bosenberg MW, Hashimoto H, and Kelsh RN. What is a vertebrate pigment cell? Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 29: 8–14. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Bagnara JT, and Hadley ME. Chromatophores and color change; the comparative physiology of animal pigmentation. Bern H.A, Series Ed.Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ. 1973. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Burton D. Flatfish (Pleuronectiformes) chromatic biology. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 20: 31–46. 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kuntz A. The histological basis of adaptive shades and colors in the flounder Paralichthys albiguttus. Bulletin US Bureau Fisheries. 35: 1–29. 1915. [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Hishida TO, Tomita H, and Yamamoto TO. Melanin formation in color varieties of the medaka (Oryzias latipes). Embryologia (Nagoya). 5: 335–346. 1961. [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Sugimoto M, Oshima N, and Fujii R. Mechanisms controlling motile responses of amelanotic melanophores in the medaka, Oryzias latipes. Zool Sci. 2: 317–322. 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Oliphant LW, and Hudon J. Pteridines as reflecting pigments and components of reflecting organelles in vertebrates. Pigment Cell Res. 6: 205–208. 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Hirata M, Nakamura K, Kanemaru T, Shibata Y, and Kondo S. Pigment cell organization in the hypodermis of zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 227: 497–503. 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Obika M. Ultrastructure and physiological response of leucophores of the medaka Oryzias latipes. Zool Sci. 5: 311–321. 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Goda M, Fujiyoshi Y, Sugimoto M, and Fujii R. Novel dichromatic chromatophores in the integument of the mandarin fish Synchiropus splendidus. Biol Bull. 224: 14–17. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Nakajima M, Shinohara E, and Fujio Y. Fluorescent chromatophore detected in the guppy Poecilia reticulata. Zool Sci. 16: 745–747. 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Wucherer MF, and Michiels NK. A fluorescent chromatophore changes the level of fluorescence in a reef fish. PLoS One. 7: e37913. 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Bagnara JT. Developmental aspects of vertebrate chromatophores. Integr Comp Biol. 23: 465–478. 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Etoh H, Hyodo-Taguchi Y, Aoki K, Murata M, and Matsudaira H. Incidence of chromatoblastomas in aging goldfish (Carassius auratus). J Natl Cancer Inst. 70: 523–528. 1983. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hirose E, and Matsumoto J. Deficiency of the gene B impairs differentiation of melanophores in the medaka fish, Oryzias latipes: fine structure studies. Pigment Cell Res. 6: 45–51. 1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Jacobson ER, Ferris W, Bagnara JT, and Iverson WO. Chromatophoromas in a pine snake. Pigment Cell Res. 2: 26–33. 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Matsumoto J, Ishikawa T, Masahito P, Oikawa A, and Takayama S. Multiplicity in Phenotypic Expression of Fish Erythrophoroma and Irido-melanophoroma Cells In Vitro. In: Phyletic Approaches to Cancer. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium of The Princess Takamatsu Cancer Research Fund, CJ Dawe, JC Harshbarger, S Kondo, T Sugimura and S Takayama (eds). Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo. 253–266. 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Ryan MJ, Hill DL, and Whitney GD. Malignant chromatophoroma in a gopher snake. Vet Pathol. 18: 827–829. 1981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Kimura T, Nagao Y, Hashimoto H, Yamamoto-Shiraishi Y, Yamamoto S, Yabe T, Takada S, Kinoshita M, Kuroiwa A, and Naruse K. Leucophores are similar to xanthophores in their specification and differentiation processes in medaka. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111: 7343–7348. 2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Colanesi S, Taylor KL, Temperley ND, Lundegaard PR, Liu D, North TE, Ishizaki H, Kelsh RN, and Patton EE. Small molecule screening identifies targetable zebrafish pigmentation pathways. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 25: 131–143. 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kelsh RN, Brand M, Jiang YJ, Heisenberg CP, Lin S, Haffter P, Odenthal J, Mullins MC, van Eeden FJM, Furutani-Seiki M, Granato M, Hammerschmidt M, Kane DA, Warga RM, Beuchle D, Vogelsang L, and Nüsslein-Volhard C. Zebrafish pigmentation mutations and the processes of neural crest development. Development. 123: 369–389. 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Gordon M, and Lansing W. Cutaneous melanophore eruptions in young fishes during stages preceding melanotic tumor formation. J Morphol. 73: 231–245. 1943. [Google Scholar]
  • 131.DePasquale JA. Apical surface ring formation in Cyprinus carpio scale epidermis. Acta Zool. 100: 337–358. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Ito Y, Matsuda Y, and Suzuki T. Effects of 3,4-dichloroaniline on expression of ahr2 and cyp1a1 in zebrafish adults and embryos. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 152: 189–194. 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Shephard KL. Functions for fish mucus. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 4: 401–429. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Esteban MA. ISRN Immunology. An Overview of the Immunological Defenses in Fish Skin. 2012: 29. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Merrifield DL, and Rodiles A. The fish microbiome and its interactions with mucosal tissues. In: Mucosal Health in Aquaculture, 273–295. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Schwerdtfeger WK. Qualitative and quantitative data on the fine structure of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata Peters) epidermis following treatment with thyroxine and testosterone. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 38: 484–490. 1979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Iger Y, Abraham M, Dotan A, Fattal B, and Rahamim E. Cellular responses in the skin of carp maintained in organically fertilized water. J Fish Biol. 33: 711–720. 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Pottinger TG, and Pickering AD. The effects of 11-ketotestosterone and testosterone on the skin structure of brown trout, Salmo trutta L. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 59: 335–342. 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Roberts RJ, Shearer WM, Munro ALS, and Elson KGR. Studies on ulcerative dermal necrosis of salmonids: II. The sequential pathology of the lesions. J Fish Biol. 2: 373–378. 1970. [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Nonnotte G, and Kirsch R. Cutaneous respiration in seven sea-water teleosts. Respir Physiol. 35: 111–118. 1978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Bullock AM, and Roberts RJ. Sunburn lesions in salmonid fry: a clinical and histological report. J Fish Dis. 4: 271–275. 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Roberts RJ. Ulcerative dermal necrosis (UDN) in wild salmonids. Fish Res. 17: 3–14. 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Ferri S. Temperature induced transformation of teleost (Pimelodus maculatus) epidermal cells. Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb. 128: 712–731. 1982. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Noceda C, Sierra SG, and Martínez JL. Histopathology of UV-B irradiated brown trout Salmo trutta skin. Dis Aquat Organ. 31: 103–108. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Wolf JC, Baumgartner WA, Blazer VS, Camus AC, Engelhardt JA, Fournie JW, Frasca S, Jr , Groman DB, Kent ML, Khoo LH, Law JM, Lombardini ED, Ruehl-Fehlert C, Segner HE, Smith SA, Spitsbergen JM, Weber K, and Wolfe MJ. Nonlesions, misdiagnoses, missed diagnoses, and other interpretive challenges in fish histopathology studies: a guide for investigators, authors, reviewers, and readers. Toxicol Pathol. 43: 297–325. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Abraham M, Iger Y, and Zhang L. Fine structure of the skin cells of a stenohaline freshwater fish Cyprinus carpio exposed to diluted seawater. Tissue Cell. 33: 46–54. 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Fontenot DK, and Neiffer DL. Wound management in teleost fish: biology of the healing process, evaluation, and treatment. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 7: 57–86. 2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Poston HA, Livingston DL, Pyle EA, and Phillips AM. The toxicity of high levels of vitamin a in the diet of brook trout. Fisheries Research Bulletin New York Conservation Department. 29: 20–04. 1966. [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Elmore SA, Dixon D, Hailey JR, Harada T, Herbert RA, Maronpot RR, Nolte T, Rehg JE, Rittinghausen S, Rosol TJ, Satoh H, Vidal JD, Willard-Mack CL, and Creasy DM. Recommendations from the INHAND apoptosis/necrosis working group. Toxicol Pathol. 44: 173–188. 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Ankley GT, Jensen KM, Kahl MD, Korte JJ, and Makynen EA. Description and evaluation of a short-term reproduction test with the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environ Toxicol Chem. 20: 1276–1290. 2001. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Dyková I, and Lom J. Histopathology of Protistan and Myxozoan Infections in Fishes: an Atlas. Academia, Praha. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Eiras JC. Fish Diseases. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Kabata Z. Diseases caused by metazoans: Crustaceans. Diseases of Marine Animals. 4: 321–399. 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Robertson DA, Roberts RJ, and Bullock AM. Pathogenesis and autoradiographic studies of the epidermis of salmonids infested with Ichtyobodo necator (Henneguy, 1883). J Fish Dis. 4: 113–125. 1981. [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Woo PTK. Fish Diseases and Disorders: Protozoan and Metazoan Infections. 2nd. ed. CAB International, Wallingford UK. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Freeman MA, Fuss J, Kristmundsson Á, Bjorbækmo MFM, Mangot JF, del Campo J, Keeling PJ, Shalchian-Tabrizi K, and Bass D. x-cells are globally distibuted, genetically divergent fish parasites related to perkinsids and dinoflagellates. Current Biology. 28: 1645–1651. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 157.McArn GE, and Wellings SR. A comparison of skin tumors in three species of flounders. J Fish Res Board Can. 28: 1241–1251. 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Bullock AM. The effect of ultraviolet‐B radiation upon the skin of the plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L., infested with the bodonid ectoparasite Ichthyobodo necator (Henneguy, 1883). J Fish Dis. 8: 547–550. 1985. [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Maddocks CE, Nolan ET, Feist SW, Crumlish M, Richards RH, and Williams CF. Puffy skin disease (PSD) in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum): a case definition. J Fish Dis. 38: 653–664. 2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Roberts RJ, and Hill BJ. Studies on ulcerative dermal necrosis of salmonids V. The histopathology of the condition in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.). J Fish Biol. 8: 89–92. 1976. [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Black JJ. Field and laboratory studies of environmental carcinogenesis in Niagara river fish. J Great Lakes Res. 9: 326–334. 1983. [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Iger Y, Lock RAC, van der Meij JCA, and Wendelaar Bonga SE. Effects of water-borne cadmium on the skin of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 26: 342–350. 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Lindesjöö E. Temporal variation and sexual dimorphism of the skin of perch Perca fluviatilis L.: a morphological study. J Appl Ichthyology. 10: 154–166. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Blazer VS, Walsh HL, Braham RP, Hahn CM, Mazik P, and McIntyre PB. Tumours in white suckers from Lake Michigan tributaries: pathology and prevalence. J Fish Dis. 40: 377–393. 2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Christiansen JS, and Jobling M. Histomorphological changes in epidermal structure of juvenile Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.) subjected to sustained exercise. Can J Zool. 69: 2450–2455. 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • 166.McBride JR, Fagerlund UHM, Dye HM, and Bagshaw J. Changes in structure of tissues and in plasma cortisol during the spawning migration of pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbucha (Walbaum). J Fish Biol. 29: 153–166. 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 167.McBride JR, and van Overbeeke AP. Effects of androgens, estrogens, and cortisol on the skin, stomach, liver, pancreas, and kidney in gonadectomized adult sockeye salmon (Oncorhyncus nerka). J Fish Res Board Can. 28: 485–490. 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Coffee LL, Casey JW, and Bowser PR. Pathology of tumors in fish associated with retroviruses: a review. Vet Pathol. 50: 390–403. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Herman RL, Burke CN, and Perry S. Epidermal tumors of rainbow smelt with associated virus. J Wildl Dis. 33: 925–929. 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Freitas JT, Subramaniam K, Kelley KL, Marcquenski S, Groff J, and Waltzek TB. Genetic characterization of esocid herpesvirus 1 (EsHV1). Dis Aquat Organ. 122: 1–11. 2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Yamamoto T, Kelly RK, and Nielsen O. Epidermal hyperplasias of northern pike (Esox lucius) associated with herpesvirus and C-type particles. Arch Virol. 79: 255–272. 1984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Overstreet RM, and Hawkins WE. Diseases and mortalities of fishes and other animals in the Gulf of Mexico. In: Habitats and Biota of the Gulf of Mexico: Before the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, 1589–1738. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Richards RH, and Buchanan JS. Studies on Herpesvirus scophthalmi infection of turbot Scophthalmus maximus (L.): Histopathological observations. J Fish Dis. 1: 251–258. 1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Iger Y, Jenner HA, and Wendelaar bonga SE. Cellular responses in the skin of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) exposed to Rhine water. J Fish Biol. 45: 1119–1132. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Pittman K, Pittman A, Karlson S, Cieplinska T, Sourd P, Redmond K, Ravnøy B, and Sweetman E. Body site matters: an evaluation and application of a novel histological methodology on the quantification of mucous cells in the skin of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. J Fish Dis. 36: 115–127. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Quiniou SMA, Bigler S, Clem LW, and Bly JE. Effects of water temperature on mucous cell distribution in channel catfish epidermis: A factor in winter saprolegniasis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 8: 1–11. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Saglio P, and Fauconneau B. Free amino acid content in the skin mucus of goldfish, Carassius auratus L.: influence of feeding. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 82: 67–70. 1985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Vatsos IN, Kotzamanis Y, Henry M, Angelidis P, and Alexis M. Monitoring stress in fish by applying image analysis to their skin mucous cells. Eur J Histochem. 54: e22. 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Burkhardt-Holm P, Escher M, and Meier W. Waste-water management plant effluents cause cellular alterations in the skin of brown trout. J Fish Biol. 50: 744–758. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Iger Y, and Wendelaar Bonga SE. Cellular responses of the skin of carp (Cyprinus carpio) exposed to acidified water. Cell &amp. Tissue Research. 275: 481–492. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 181.McArn GE, Chuinard RG, Miller BS, Brooks RE, and Wellings SR. Pathology of skin tumors found on English sole and starry flounder from Puget Sound, Washington. J Natl Cancer Inst. 41: 229–242. 1968. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Beckwith LG, Moore JL, Tsao-Wu GS, Harshbarger JC, and Cheng KC. Ethylnitrosourea induces neoplasia in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Lab Invest. 80: 379–385. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Anders K, and Yoshimizu M. Role of viruses in the induction of skin tumours and tumour-like proliferations of fish. Dis Aquat Organ. 19: 215–232. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Bloch B, Mellergaard S, and Nielsen E. Adenovirus‐like particles associated with epithelial hyperplasias in dab, Limanda limanda (L.). J Fish Dis. 9: 281–285. 1986. [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Doszpoly A, Karaseva TA, Waltzek TB, Kalabekov IM, and Shchelkunov IS. Atlantic salmon papillomatosis in Russia and molecular characterization of the associated herpesvirus. Dis Aquat Organ. 107: 121–127. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Mawdesley-Thomas L. Neoplasia in fish: a review. Curr Top Comp Pathobiol. 1: 87–170. 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Peters G, and Peters N. The influence of salinity on growth and structure of epidermal papillomas of the European eel Anguilla anguilla L. J Fish Dis. 2: 13–26. 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Bylund G, Valtonen ET, and Niemel ÄE. Observations on epidermal papillomata in wild and cultured Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. in Finland. J Fish Dis. 3: 525–528. 1980. [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Carlisle JC, and Roberts RJ. An epidermal papilloma of the Atlantic salmon I: Epizootiology, pathology and immunology. J Wildl Dis. 13: 230–234. 1977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Morrison CM, and Macdonald CA. Epidermal tumors on rainbow smelt and atlantic salmon from nova scotia. J Aquat Anim Health. 7: 241–250. 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Nigrelli RF. Tumors and other atypical cell growths in temperate freshwater fishes of North America. Trans Am Fish Soc. 83: 262–296. 1954. [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Beatti M. Geschwülste bei Tieren. Z Krebsforsch. 15: 452–491. 1916. [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Grizzle JM, Melius P, and Strength DR. Papillomas on fish exposed to chlorinated wastewater effluent. J Natl Cancer Inst. 73: 1133–1142. 1984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Miller AS, and Aleo JJ. Spontaneous epidermal cystadenoma in a guppy (Lebistes reticularis). J Pathol. 100: 317–318. 1970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Phillips ML, Warner NE, and Puffer HW. Oral papillomas in Genyonemus lineatus (white croakers). Etiological considerations. Prog Exp Tumor Res. 20: 108–112. 1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Schlumberger HG, and Lucké BH. Tumors of fishes, amphibians, and reptiles. Cancer Res. 8: 657–753. 1948. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Fournie JW, Vogelbein WK, and Overstreet RM. Squamous cell carcinoma in the gulf menhaden, Brevoortia patronus Goode. J Fish Dis. 10: 133–136. 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Herman RL. Squamous cell carcinoma in rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax. Dis Aquat Organ. 5: 71–73. 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Mawdesley-Thomas LE, and Bucke D. Squamous cell carcinoma in a gudgeon (Gobio gobio, L.). Pathol Vet. 4: 484–489. 1967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Poulet FM, Wolfe MJ, and Spitsbergen JM. Naturally occurring orocutaneous papillomas and carcinomas of brown bullheads (Ictalurus nebulosus) in New York State. Vet Pathol. 31: 8–18. 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Manera M, and Biavati S. An immuno‐histochemical technique used to demonstrate the transition form of a squamous cell carcinoma in a mirror carp, Cyprinus carpio L. J Fish Dis. 17: 93–96. 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Lucké B, and Schlumberger H. Transplantable epitheliomas of the lip and mouth of catfish: I. pathology. transplantation to anterior chamber of eye and into cornea. J Exp Med. 74: 397–408. 1941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Bigler B. Mechanism and occurrence of focal scale resorption among Chum Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) of the North Pacific Ocean. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 46: 1147–1153. 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Persson P, Takagi Y, and Björnsson BT. Tartrate resistant acid phosphatase as a marker for scale resorption in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss: effects of estradiol-17β treatment and refeeding. Fish Physiol Biochem. 14: 329–339. 1995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.de Vrieze E, van Kessel MAHJ, Peters HM, Spanings FAT, Flik G, and Metz JR. Prednisolone induces osteoporosis-like phenotype in regenerating zebrafish scales. Osteoporos Int. 25: 567–578. 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Ouchi K, Yamada J, and Kosaka S. On the resorption of scales and associated cells in precocious male parr of the Masu Salmon (Oncorhynchus masou). Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi. 38: 423–430. 1972. [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Oidtmann B, Lapatra SE, Verner-Jeffreys D, Pond M, Peeler EJ, Noguera PA, Bruno DW, St-Hilaire S, Schubiger CB, Snekvik K, Crumlish M, Green DM, Metselaar M, Rodger H, Schmidt-Posthaus H, Galeotti M, and Feist SW. Differential characterization of emerging skin diseases of rainbow trout--a standardized approach to capturing disease characteristics and development of case definitions. J Fish Dis. 36: 921–937. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Rishi KK, and Jain M. Effect of toxicity of cadmium on scale morphology in Cyprinus carpio (cyprinidae). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 60: 323–328. 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Rutkayová J, Jawad L, Nebesářová J, Beneš K, Petrášková E, and Näslund J. First records of scale deformities in seven freshwater fish species (Actinopterygii: Percidae and Cyprinidae) collected from three ponds in the Czech Republic. Acta Ichthyol Piscat. 46: 225–238. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Carnovali M, Luzi L, Terruzzi I, Banfi G, and Mariotti M. Metabolic and bone effects of high-fat diet in adult zebrafish. Endocrine. 61: 317–326. 2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Bigler B. Focal scale damage among Chum Salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) of Hokkaido, Japan. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 45: 698–704. 1988. [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Persson P, Bjornsson BT, and Takagi Y. Characterization of morphology and physiological actions of scale osteoclasts in the rainbow trout. J Fish Biol. 54: 669–684. 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Sire JY, Huysseune A, and Meunier FJ. Osteoclasts in teleost fish: Light and electron-microscopical observations. Cell Tissue Res. 260: 85–94. 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Sugimoto M. Morphological color changes in fish: regulation of pigment cell density and morphology. Microsc Res Tech. 58: 496–503. 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Sugimoto M, and Oshima N. Introduction: Biology of pigment cells in fish. Microsc Res Tech. 58: 433–434. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Sugimoto M, Uchida N, and Hatayama M. Apoptosis in skin pigment cells of the medaka, Oryzias latipes (Teleostei), during long-term chromatic adaptation: the role of sympathetic innervation. Cell Tissue Res. 301: 205–216. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Chavin W. Pituitary‐adrenal control of melanization in xanthic goldfish, Carassius auratus L. J Exp Zool. 133: 1–45. 1956. [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Alexandrawicz JS. Lymphocystis tumours in the Red Mullet (Mullus surmuletus L.). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom. 30: 315–332. 1951. [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Bovo G, and Florio D. Viral Diseases of Cultured Marine Fish. In: Fish Diseases, JC Eiras, HE Segner, T Wahli and BG Kapoor (eds). Science Publishers, 185–238. 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Dunbar CE, and Wolf K. The cytological course of experimental lymphocystis in the bluegill. J Infect Dis. 116: 466–472. 1966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Joseph H. Untersuchungen über Lymphocystis Woodc. Arch Protistenkd. 38: 155–249. 1918. [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Weissenberg R. Viral Diseases of Poikilothermic Vertebrates. Fifty Years of Research on the Lymphocystis Virus Disease of Fishes, Vol. 126. Kearneysville, W.Va. 1965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Howse HD, Lawler AR, Hawkins WE, and Foster CA. Ultrastructure of lymphocystis in the heart of the silver perch, Bairdiella chrysura (Lacépède), including observations on normal heart structure. Gulf Res Rep. 1: 39–57. 1977. [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Soto E, Boylan SM, Stevens B, Smith SA, Yanong RPE, Subramaniam K, and Waltzek T. Diagnosis of Fish Diseases. In: Fish Diseases and Medicine, 1st SA Smith (ed). CRC Press, Boca Raton FL. 46–88. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Lévesque M, Feng Y, Jones RA, and Martin P. Inflammation drives wound hyperpigmentation in zebrafish by recruiting pigment cells to sites of tissue damage. Dis Model Mech. 6: 508–515. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Noguera PA, Feist SW, Bateman KS, Lang T, Grütjen F, and Bruno DW. Hyperpigmentation in North Sea dab Limanda limanda. II. Macroscopic and microscopic characteristics and pathogen screening. Dis Aquat Organ. 103: 25–34. 2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Blazer VS, Shaw CH, Smith CR, Emerson P, and Jones T. Malignant melanoma of brown bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus) in Lake Memphremagog, Vermont/Quebec. J Fish Dis. 43: 91–100. 2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Okihiro MS. Chromatophoromas in two species of Hawaiian butterflyfish, Chaetodon multicinctus and C. miliaris. Vet Pathol. 25: 422–431. 1988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Ishikawa T, Masahito P, Matsumoto J, and Takayama S. Morphologic and biochemical characterization of erythrophoromas in goldfish (Carassius auratus). J Natl Cancer Inst. 61: 1461–1470. 1978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Kimura I, Taniguchi N, Kumai H, Tomita I, Kinae N, Yoshizaki K, Ito M, Ishikawa T. National Cancer Institute Monograph. Correlation of epizootiological observations with experimental data: chemical induction of chromatophoromas in the croaker, Nibea mitsukurii. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 65: 139–154. 1984. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Masahito P, Ishikawa T, and Sugano H. Pigment cells and pigment cell tumors in fish. J Invest Dermatol. 92(Suppl): 266S–270S. 1989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Okihiro MS, Whipple JA, Groff JM, and Hinton DE. Chromatophoromas and chromatophore hyperplasia in Pacific rockfish (Sebastes spp.). Cancer Res. 53: 1761–1769. 1993. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Smith GM. A cutaneous red pigmented tumor (erythro-phoroma) with metastases in a flatfish (pseudopleuronectes americanus). Am J Cancer. 21: 596–599. 1934. [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Ermin R. On a case of xantho-erythrophoroma formation in platypoecilus maculatus var. fuliginosus. Review of Faculty of Science, University of Istanbul. Serie B. 18: 301–314. 1953. [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Nigrelli RF, Jakowska S, and Gordon M. The invasion and cell replacement of one pigmented neoplastic growth by a second, and more malignant type in experimental fishes. Br J Cancer. 5: 54–68. 1951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Sobel HJ, Marquet E, Kallman KD, and Corley GJ. Melanomas in platy/swordtail hybrids. The Pathology of Fishes. 945–981. 1975.
  • 237.Gimenez-Conti I, Woodhead AD, Harshbarger JC, Kazianis S, Setlow RB, Nairn RS, and Walter RB. A proposed classification scheme for Xiphophorus melanomas based on histopathologic analyses. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 3(Supplement 1): S100–S106. 2001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Reed HD, and Gordon M. The morphology of melanotic over-growths in hybrids of mexican killifishes: A preliminary account. Am J Cancer. 15: 1524–1546. 1931. [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Schartl A, Malitschek B, Kazianis S, Borowsky R, and Schartl M. Spontaneous melanoma formation in nonhybrid Xiphophorus. Cancer Res. 55: 159–165. 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Okihiro MS, Whipple JA, Groff JM, and Hinton DE. Chromatophoromas and related hyperplastic lesions in Pacific rockfish (Sebastes spp.). Mar Environ Res. 34: 53–57. 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Iaria C, Ieni A, Corti I, Puleio R, Brachelente C, Mazzullo G, and Lanteri G. Immunohistochemical study of four fish tumors. J Aquat Anim Health. 31: 97–106. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Stilwell JM, McManamon R, Sturgeon GL, Camus MS, and Camus AC. Microscopic, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural characterization of spontaneous lepidosarcomas in a neon tetra, Paracheirodon innesi, and a black crappie, Pomoxis nigromaculatus. J Fish Dis. 42: 1077–1083. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Bunton TE, and Wolfe MJ. N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced neoplasms in medaka (Oryzias latipes). Toxicol Pathol. 24: 323–330. 1996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Martineau D, Bowser PR, Wooster G, and Forney JL. Histologic and ultrastructural studies of dermal sarcoma of walleye (Pisces: Stizostedion vitreum). Vet Pathol. 27: 340–346. 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Martineau D, Bowser PR, Wooster GA, and Armstrong LD. Experimental transmission of a dermal sarcoma in fingerling walleyes (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). Vet Pathol. 27: 230–234. 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Huysseune A, and Sire JY. Ultrastructural observations on chondroid bone in the teleost fish Hemichromis bimaculatus. Tissue Cell. 22: 371–383. 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Toxicologic Pathology are provided here courtesy of The Japanese Society of Toxicologic Pathology

RESOURCES