Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1972 Nov;18(3):345–367. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-345

Recognition by the pigeon of stimuli varying in two dimensions1

Donald S Blough
PMCID: PMC1334023  PMID: 16811632

Abstract

Pigeons served in four experiments, each of which involved about 44,000 discrete 1.2-sec trials under steady-state conditions. The first experiment scaled a short segment of the visual wavelength continuum; this dimension was then combined in a conditional discrimination with each of three others; time after reinforcement, tone frequency, and line tilt. In the two-stimulus experiments, the birds' responses were reinforced in the presence of only one stimulus combination: “582 nm” together with “2 min after reinforcement”, “3990 Hz”, or “vertical line”. Many other stimulus combinations also appeared equally often and went without reinforcement. The wavelength stimuli conformed to an equal-interval scale, and per cent response was generally linear with wavelength, when scaled on cumulative normal coordinates. The components of the compound stimulus were found to interact in a multiplicative fashion; when one component differed greatly from its reinforcement value, changes in the other component had relatively little effect. For the “time”-“wavelength” compound, this interaction appeared to be modified by the effects of set or attention. Certain response latency data are reported, and other combination rules are discussed.

Full text

PDF
345

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson N. H. Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. Psychol Rev. 1970 May;77(3):153–170. doi: 10.1037/h0029064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. BLOUGH D. S. Spectral sensitivity in the pigeon. J Opt Soc Am. 1957 Sep;47(9):827–833. doi: 10.1364/josa.47.000827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. BUTTER C. M. Stimulus generalization along one and two dimensions in pigeons. J Exp Psychol. 1963 Apr;65:339–346. doi: 10.1037/h0040258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blough D. S. Attention shifts in a maintained discrimination. Science. 1969 Oct 3;166(3901):125–126. doi: 10.1126/science.166.3901.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blough D. S. Generalization gradient shape and summation in steady-state tests. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):91–104. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blough D. S. Stimulus generalization as signal detection in pigeons. Science. 1967 Nov 17;158(3803):940–941. doi: 10.1126/science.158.3803.940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blough D. S. The reinforcement of least-frequent interresponse times. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):581–591. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blough D. S. The shape of some wavelength generalization gradients. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jan;4(1):31–40. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boneau C. A., Cole J. L. Decision theory, the pigeon, and the psychophysical function. Psychol Rev. 1967 Mar;74(2):123–135. doi: 10.1037/h0024287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. CLARK W. A., MOLNAR C. E. THE LINC: A DESCRIPTION OF THE LABORATORY INSTRUMENT COMPUTER. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 Jul 31;115:653–668. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chase S., Heinemann E. G. Choices based on redundant information: an analysis of two-dimensional stimulus control. J Exp Psychol. 1972 Feb;92(2):161–175. doi: 10.1037/h0032083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. ESTES W. K. The problem of inference from curves based on group data. Psychol Bull. 1956 Mar;53(2):134–140. doi: 10.1037/h0045156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Miller L., Ackley R. Summation of responding maintained by fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):199–203. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Swets J. A., Kristofferson A. B. Attention. Annu Rev Psychol. 1970;21:339–366. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.21.020170.002011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. WEISS S. J. SUMMATION OF RESPONSE STRENGTHS INSTRUMENTALLY CONDITIONED TO STIMULI IN DIFFERENT SENSORY MODALITIES. J Exp Psychol. 1964 Aug;68:151–155. doi: 10.1037/h0049180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. WOLF M. M. Some effects of combined S-DS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6:343–347. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Weiss S. J. Free-operant compounding of variable-interval and low-rate discriminative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Nov;10(6):535–540. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES