Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1972 Nov;18(3):535–540. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-535

Reduction of intraspecies aggression in rats by positive reinforcement of incompatible behaviors1

Joy Baisinger, Carl L Roberts
PMCID: PMC1334040  PMID: 4676777

Abstract

Fighting responses were elicited by response-independent shocks delivered to pairs of rats. Food pellets were presented following different non-fighting responses to shock: some pairs of rats received pellets dependent upon a specific non-fighting response to shock; others received pellets dependent upon any non-fighting response to shock; and control pairs never received pellets. The mean probability of an elicited aggressive response to shock was reduced to 0.2 by food reinforcement for a specific non-fighting response, and to 0.5 by food reinforcement for any kind of non-fighting response. These values contrasted with the 0.8 probability of elicited aggression when pairs of rats received no food reinforcement. Consistent findings were obtained when treatment conditions were changed for individual pairs of rats.

Full text

PDF
535

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azrin N. H. Punishment of elicited aggression. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):7–10. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baenninger R., Grossman J. C. Some effects of punishment on pain-elicited aggression. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):1017–1022. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-1017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Myer J. S., Baenninger R. Some effects of punishment and stress on mouse killing by rats. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1966 Oct;62(2):292–297. doi: 10.1037/h0023690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Roberts C. L., Blase K. Elicitation and punishment of intraspecies aggression by the same stimulus. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):193–196. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Skinner B. F. The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior. Contingencies of reinforcement throw light on contingencies of survival in the evolution of behavior. Science. 1966 Sep 9;153(3741):1205–1213. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3741.1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. ULRICH R. E., AZRIN N. H. Reflexive fighting in response to aversive stimulation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:511–520. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. ULRICH R. E., CRAINE W. H. BEHAVIOR: PERSISTENCE OF SHOCK-INDUCED AGGRESSION. Science. 1964 Feb 28;143(3609):971–973. doi: 10.1126/science.143.3609.971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ulrich R., Wolfe M., Dulaney S. Punishment of shock-induced aggression. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):1009–1015. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-1009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES