Abstract
Twelve pigeons were trained on matching-to-sample using either a 0-, 5-, 15-, 25-, or 60-sec intertrial interval. Eight of these 12 pigeons were given one of the following intertrial interval changes: 0 to 60, 0 to 5, 5 to 0, 60 to 0, 15 to 25, 5 to 15, 60 to 5, 5 to 1, 1 to 5, 1 to 25, and 25 to 1 sec. Most intertrial interval changes were repeated at least once. The 0-sec intertrial interval subjects failed to match beyond chance levels, while other intertrial interval values resulted in matching acquisition. Changes from 0 sec to other intertrial interval values increased and changes to 0 sec decreased matching performance. Changes to intertrial interval values other than 0 sec resulted in little change in matching accuracy once stable performance had been attained.
Full text
PDFdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/026e1/026e11855dd13f9de2b4372987fd5470fdce200e" alt="181"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1ce5/f1ce5341876a284dc23a94b391e4876a9cd4d7cc" alt="182"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25519/255197f1816329b0edc412cb90eeeba517e5b484" alt="183"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abd8a/abd8ad514222fbd85be751645e2bb0e3a61d7af2" alt="184"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc6a9/cc6a922c133eaf4bb6c78b95794f3e2487bdf13e" alt="185"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80b19/80b19db2db30e9f708845a5a637fdcd031390556" alt="186"
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Berryman R., Cumming W. W., Nevin J. A. Acquisition of delayed matching in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6(1):101–107. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen L. R. Generalization during acquisition, extinction, and transfer of matching with an adjustable comparison. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 May;12(3):463–474. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eckerman D. A., Lanson R. N., Cumming W. W. Acquisition and maintenance of matching without a required observing response. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):435–441. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FERSTER C. B. Intermittent reinforcement of matching to sample in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Jul;3:259–272. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1960.3-259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- JENKINS H. M. The effect of discrimination training on extinction. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Feb;61:111–121. doi: 10.1037/h0047606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller N. B., Zimmerman J. The effects of a pre-time-out stimulus on matching-to-sample of humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):487–499. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NEVIN J. A., CUMMING W. W., BERRYMAN T. Ratio reinforcement of matching behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:149–154. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ZIMMERMAN J., BAYDAN N. T. PUNISHMENT OF S-DELTA RESPONDING OF HUMANS IN CONDITIONAL MATCHING TO SAMPLE BY TIME-OUT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Oct;6:589–597. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]