Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1973 Mar;19(2):233–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-233

Pup retrieving as a reinforcer in nulliparous mice1

Susan B Van Hemel
PMCID: PMC1334075  PMID: 4706236

Abstract

Six nulliparous female mice were trained to bar press with bar pressing reinforced by the opportunity to retrieve pups to the nest. Then, responses on one bar produced the opportunity to retrieve pups, while responses on a second bar produced sensory contact with non-retrievable pups, presented behind a screen door. All subjects emitted more responses on the bar yielding retrievable pups. When the bar-pup contingency was reversed, five subjects learned to press the opposite bar for retrievable pups. The sixth subject showed extinction of responding on the bar that had previously yielded retrievable pups, but failed to press the other bar. A major portion of the reinforcing value of pup presentation resulted from the opportunity to perform the behavior of pup retrieving. This finding supports theoretical formulations which state that the performance of species-typical consummatory behaviors should have reinforcing properties.

Full text

PDF
233

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gandelman R., Zarrow M. X., Denenberg V. H. Maternal behavior: differences between mother and virgin mice as a function of the testing procedure. Dev Psychobiol. 1970;3(3):207–214. doi: 10.1002/dev.420030308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Glickman S. E., Schiff B. B. A biological theory of reinforcement. Psychol Rev. 1967 Mar;74(2):81–109. doi: 10.1037/h0024290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. KISH G. B. Learning when the onset of illumination is used as reinforcing stimulus. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1955 Aug;48(4):261–264. doi: 10.1037/h0040782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Noirot E. Ultra-sounds in young rodents. I. Changes with age in albino mice. Anim Behav. 1966 Oct;14(4):459–462. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3472(66)80045-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. SHEFFIELD F. D., WULFF J. J., BACKER R. Reward value of copulation without sex drive reduction. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1951 Feb;44(1):3–8. doi: 10.1037/h0060074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. THOMPSON T. I. VISUAL REINFORCEMENT IN FIGHTING COCKS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:45–49. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Thompson T. I. Visual Reinforcement in Siamese Fighting Fish. Science. 1963 Jul 5;141(3575):55–57. doi: 10.1126/science.141.3575.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Valenstein E. S., Cox V. C., Kakolewski J. W. Reexamination of the role of the hypothalamus in motivation. Psychol Rev. 1970 Jan;77(1):16–31. doi: 10.1037/h0028581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Van Hemel P. E. Aggression as a reinforcer: operant behavor in the mouse-killing rat. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Mar;17(2):237–245. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.17-237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES