Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1973 Sep;20(2):163–181. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-163

The form of the auto-shaped response with food or water reinforcers1

H M Jenkins, Bruce R Moore
PMCID: PMC1334117  PMID: 4752087

Abstract

The relation between the form of auto-shaped responses to the lighting of a key and the consummatory responses of pecking grain and drinking water was examined in pigeons. Responses on the key were analyzed by means of high-speed photography, recordings of the force of contact, and judges' ratings of response-form based on film and videotape recordings. The first experiment showed that food-deprived birds presented grain as a reinforcer responded on the key with a grain-pecking movement, while water-deprived birds presented water as a reinforcer responded with drinking-like movements. The second and third experiments showed that the resemblance between auto-shaped and consummatory responses does not require the dominance of the deprivational state appropriate to the reinforcer. Changing the dominant state of deprivation did not immediately change the form of the key response, and in subjects simultaneously deprived of food and water, the form of response depended on the reinforcer. In the fourth and fifth experiments, subjects simultaneously deprived of food and water received one stimulus signalling food and another signalling water in a random series. In most subjects, the response to each stimulus resembled the consummatory response to the particular reinforcer that was signalled by the stimulus. This result demonstrates the role of association between a stimulus and a reinforcer in producing a resemblance of the auto-shaped response to the consummatory response.

Full text

PDF
163

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brown P. L., Jenkins H. M. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gamzu E., Williams D. R. Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response. Science. 1971 Mar 5;171(3974):923–925. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3974.923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gardner W. M. Auto-shaping in bobwhite quail. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):279–281. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. HEFFERLINE R. F., BIRCH J. D., GENTRY T. Simple transducers to detect or record operant amplitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:257–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Rachlin H. Autoshaping of key pecking in pigeons with negative reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):521–531. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rescorla R. A. Probability of shock in the presence and absence of CS in fear conditioning. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1968 Aug;66(1):1–5. doi: 10.1037/h0025984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rilling M., Kramer T. J., Askew H. R. A preliminary analysis of the dynamics of the pecking response in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):267–278. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sidman M., Fletcher F. G. A demonstration of auto-shaping with monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):307–309. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Williams D. R., Williams H. Auto-maintenance in the pigeon: sustained pecking despite contingent non-reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):511–520. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES