Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2026 Apr 14;80(7):694–699. doi: 10.1038/s41430-026-01746-x

Vitamin D status and response to supplementation in very preterm infants: A prospective cohort study

Suphawe Wasuanankun 1, Prattana Rattanachamnongk 2, Buranee Yangthara 3, Sopapan Ngerncham 3, Ratchada Kitsommart 3, Punnanee Wutthigate 3,✉
PMCID: PMC13341313  PMID: 41974919

Abstract

Background

Very preterm infants are at high risk of vitamin D deficiency (VDD), which contributes to metabolic bone disease (MBD) and other morbidities. Despite guidelines, optimal dosing remains uncertain. We determined VDD incidence and evaluated 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] responses to varying vitamin D intakes during the first 8 weeks of life.

Methods

This prospective cohort enrolled infants born at <32 weeks’ gestation or birth weight <1500 g. Vitamin D supplementation followed institutional policy. Infants were categorized by total intake (parenteral plus enteral) during weeks 0–4: <400, 400–700, or >700 IU/kg/day. Serum 25(OH)D was measured at birth, 4, and 8 weeks. Biochemical markers and MBD screening were performed. VDD was defined as 25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL and excess (VDE) as >100 ng/mL.

Results

Among 126 infants (gestational age 30 [27, 31] weeks; birth weight 1230 [950, 1570] g), 94.3% had VDD at birth. At 4 weeks, VDD persisted in 17.8% receiving <400 IU/kg/day and 6.5% receiving 400–700 IU/kg/day; vitamin D excess (VDE) occurred in 3.3% and 3.2%, respectively. At 8 weeks, normal 25(OH)D was achieved in 90.1% receiving <400 IU/kg/day and 77.4% receiving 400–700 IU/kg/day, while VDE increased to 8.6% and 22.6%, respectively. Biochemical markers remained normal; only one infant developed MBD.

Conclusions

VDD is highly prevalent at birth in very preterm infants. Daily intake <400 IU/kg generally normalizes vitamin D status by 8 weeks while minimizing risk of excessive vitamin D. Higher doses may provide no additional benefit and increase risk of exceeding 25(OH)D levels.

Clinical trial registration

Thai Clinical Trials Registry. Registration number TCTR20230725007. Web link: http://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20230725007.

Subject terms: Paediatrics, Nutrition

Introduction

Vitamin D is integral to calcium homeostasis, bone mineralization, and immune regulation. Vitamin D deficiency (VDD) is common in preterm infants, who are deprived of the third-trimester transplacental transfer that establishes fetal stores and often rely on parenteral nutrition with limited vitamin D content [1, 2]. Maternal and neonatal vitamin D status are strongly correlated; maternal deficiency therefore exerts substantial influence in preterm populations [3, 4]. Globally, VDD prevalence in very preterm infants ranges from 40% to 80% [5–8]. VDD contributes to metabolic bone disease (MBD), which may present at 6 to 8 weeks of life and, if untreated, can lead to fractures or rickets-like changes. A recent review reported MBD prevalence up to 55% in extremely low birth weight infants and 23% in very low birth weight infants [9]. Beyond skeletal consequences, VDD is associated with respiratory morbidities including bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) [10–12].

Despite its clinical significance, the optimal vitamin D intake for very preterm infants remains uncertain because guidelines differ widely. The European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) recommends 400-700 IU/kg/day [13], whereas the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) suggests 200–400 IU/day for very low birth weight infants [14]. Consequently, practice varies widely across and within institutions; a recent survey in the USA reported that 77% of neonatal intensive care units administered 400 IU/day to extremely preterm infants [15].

In Thailand, data on vitamin D status in preterm infants are limited; however, vitamin D insufficiency or VDD has been reported in up to 89% of healthy term infants [16]. In very preterm infants, a recent study demonstrated a mean baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration of approximately 14.8 ng/mL before supplementation [17]. Despite these concerning findings, national data on the incidence and progression of VDD in very preterm infants remain limited. Moreover, substantial variability in clinical practice regarding vitamin D dosing often implemented without standardized monitoring which raises concerns about both inadequate supplementation and potential overexposure. Overexposure may result in elevated 25 (OH)D levels, which are frequently asymptomatic but may pose unknown long-term risks.

At our institution, attending physicians prescribe vitamin D supplementation at their discretion, following either AAP [14] or ESPGHAN [13] recommendations. ESPGHAN currently advocates higher doses for very preterm infants (400-700 IU/kg/day) to support bone mineralization and prevent MBD. However, baseline vitamin D status varies widely by gestational age, birth weight, and maternal vitamin D levels, which may modulate response to supplementation. These uncertainties necessitate evaluating the performance of dosing recommendations in real-world clinical settings.

Given these gaps, we aimed to determine the incidence of VDD in very preterm infants and to evaluate temporal trends in serum vitamin D levels in response to routine clinical supplementation. By examining relationship between varying levels of vitamin D intake and longitudinal biochemical outcomes, we sought to inform appropriate and safer dosing strategies for very preterm infants.

Methods

This prospective cohort study was conducted at Siriraj Hospital, a university-affiliated tertiary care center in Bangkok, Thailand, from June 2023 to October 2024. The study was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board and registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20230725007), one of the primary registries of the WHO Registry Network. Parents provided written informed consent for all participating infants. Eligible participants inborn were inborn infants delivered at <32 weeks’ gestation or with a birth weight <1500 g. The exclusion criterias were death within the first 7 days of life, major congenital anomalies, known disorders of vitamin D metabolism, or severe congenital lung and airway malformations.

Nutrition and feeding protocol

All infants born at <32 weeks’ gestation or with a birth weight <1500 g received total parenteral nutrition with 20% SMOF lipid emulsion immediately after birth. Enteral feeding began once clinically stable, using maternal breast milk or pasteurized donor milk depending on availability. For infants weighing 1000–1800 g, feeds were started at 3 mL/kg every 3 h; those <1000 g receive 1.5 mL/kg every 3 h. Once enteral intake reached 100 mL/kg/day, breast milk or pasteurized donor milk was fortified with premature formula to achieve a caloric density of at least 24 kcal/oz. Total parenteral nutrition was typically discontinued when enteral intake of 120 mL/kg/day was tolerated. Vitamin D was administered enterally via multivitamin drops (400 IU/mL) and/or a locally compounded vitamin D2 solution (2000 IU/mL), targeting 400–700 IU/kg/day. In selected cases with markedly low baseline vitamin D levels, higher doses were used at the attending physician’s discretion, up to a maximum of 1000 IU/day. Cord blood and subsequent serum 25(OH)D measurements at 4 and 8 weeks of age were available to the clinical team throughout the study.

Maternal and infant demographic data were abstracted from medical records. Nutritional intake—including total volume, parenteral and enteral fluid intake, and caloric intake—was calculated daily. Average total vitamin D intake from birth to 4 weeks was calculated from total parenteral nutrition and enteral sources. Infants were then categorized into three groups: <400, 400–700 and >700 IU/kg/day. Daily calcium and phosphorus intakes were also recorded. Weight was measured daily; head circumference and length were measured weekly per unit protocol. Growth trajectories were assessed using the Fenton growth chart [18]. Infants with birth weight < 10th percentile for gestational age were classified as small for gestational age. Clinical outcomes included necrotizing enterocolitis, diagnosed using the modified Bell’s criteria [19] and bronchopulmonary dysplasia, graded at 36 weeks’ postmenstrual age using Jensen’s criteria [20].

Vitamin D status definitions and sampling

Serum 25(OH)D defined vitamin D status: VDD was <20 ng/mL, severe VDD was <12 ng/mL and VDE was >100 ng/mL [21, 22]. A normal 25(OH)D concentration was defined as 20-100 ng/mL [13, 21, 23]. Baseline serum 25(OH)D was measured from 1 mL of cord blood collected from each infant; subsequent samples were obtained at 4 and 8 weeks of postnatal age per the unit’s MBD screening protocol.

Outcomes

The primary outcome was VDD incidence at birth. The secondary outcomes were temporal changes in serum 25(OH)D at 4 and 8 weeks after routine supplementation, growth trajectories across the study period, and MBD incidence. Serum 25(OH)D was quantified using electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) method on the Cobas® e801 Analytical Unit (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). Additional biochemical assessments comprised serum total calcium, albumin, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase levels.

Statistical analysis

Sample size calculation was based on an assumed VDD incidence of 37% in very preterm infants [4]. We targeted enrollment of 126 infants, allowing a 25% relative margin of error and accounting for 20% dropout. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 29.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and R Studio version 2024.04 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Continuous variables were summarized as mean with standard deviation or median and (25th, 75th percentile), as appropriate; categorical variables as frequencies and percentages. Between-group differences used independent t-tests or Mann–Whitney U tests for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables. Outcomes across vitamin D intake groups (<400, 400-700, and >700 IU/kg/day) were compared using one-way ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis tests. Generalized estimating equations evaluated longitudinal changes in serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Logistic regression identified risk factors for VDD at 4 weeks. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 126 very preterm infants were enrolled. The median gestational age was 30 [27, 31] weeks, and the median birth weight was 1230 [950, 1570] g. Twenty-six infants (20.6%) were small for gestational age. Cord blood samples were successfully obtained from 123 of 126 infants (97.6%); three samples were unavailable because of technical limitations during collection (Fig. 1). Median cord blood 25(OH)D concentration was 9.7 [6.6, 14.2] ng/mL. VDD was observed in 116 of 123 infants (94.3%), and 85 infants (69.1%) had severe VDD (Fig. 2). Median serum 25(OH)D increased to 38.6 [25.1, 55.6] ng/mL at 4 weeks and 70.5 [47.8, 87.8] ng/mL at 8 weeks.

Fig. 1. Study Flow Diagram.

Fig. 1

25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; GA gestational age.

Fig. 2. Distribution of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations at Birth, 4 Weeks, and 8 Weeks of Age.

Fig. 2

The y-axis shows percentage of infants. 25(OH)D 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Vitamin D intake groups and clinical outcomes

Based on total vitamin D intake during the first 4 weeks, infants were categorized into three groups: <400 IU/kg/day (n = 93, 73.8%), 400–700 IU/kg/day (n = 31, 24.6%), and >700 IU/kg/day (n = 2, 1.6%). Baseline maternal and neonatal characteristics were generally comparable across groups, except the >700 IU/kg/day group had lower gestational age and significantly lower birth weight, reflecting greater prematurity (Table 1). There were no significant differences in RDS, late-onset sepsis, NEC stage ≥2 A, or BPD among groups (Table 2). Time to initiation of enteral feeds, attainment of 120 mL/kg/day of enteral volume, and initiation of milk fortification were similar among groups (Table 2).

Table 1.

Maternal and Neonatal Characteristics by Vitamin D Intake Group.

Total vitamin D intake (IU/kg/day) p
<400
(n = 93)
400-700
(n = 31)
>700
(n = 2)
Maternal age (years) 33.0 [28.5, 38.0] 32.0 [27.0, 35.0] 39.5 [32.0, 47.0] 0.19
Maternal BMI (kg/m2) 22.8 [20.6, 26.2] 21.8 [19.0, 24.8] 24.1 [23.2, 24.9] 0.26
Antenatal corticosteroid 91 (97.8) 29 (93.5) 2 (100.0) 0.48
Diabetes 21 (22.6) 3 (9.7) 0 (0.0) 0.22
Hypertensive disorders 27 (29.0) 12 (38.7) 2 (100.0) 0.07
Intraamniotic infection 22 (23.7) 8 (25.8) 0 (0.0) 0.71
Fetal growth restriction 19 (20.4) 4 (12.9) 0 (0.0) 0.51
Gestational age (weeks) 30 [28,31] 30 [27,30] 28 [24,31] 0.25
Male sex 46 (49.5) 14 (45.2) 0 (0.0) 0.36
1-min Apgar score 6 [4,8] 6 [4,8] 3 [1,5] 0.30
5-min Apgar score 8 [7,9] 8 [7,9] 7 [5,9] 0.84
Birth weight (g) 1300 [975, 1615] 1075 [860, 1370] 815 [510, 1120] 0.02*
Length (cm) 39.0 [34.8, 41.0] 37.0 [32.0, 40.0] 31.0 [25.0, 37.0] 0.02*
Head circumference (cm) 27.5 [24.9, 28.9] 26.0 [23.3, 27.8] 23.2 [19.4, 27.0] 0.04*

Data are presented as n (%), mean ± standard deviation or median [25th, 75th percentile].

*p < 0.05 is statistically significant.

BMI body mass index.

Table 2.

Clinical outcomes and nutritional parameters by vitamin D intake group.

Clinical characteristics Total vitamin D intake (IU/kg/day)
From Birth to 4 Weeks, IU/kg/day
p
< 400
(n = 93)
400–700
(n = 31)
>700
(n = 2)
Respiratory distress syndrome 57 (61.3) 23 (74.2) 2 (100.0) 0.24
Late-onset sepsis 43 (46.2) 11 (35.5) 1 (50.0) 0.60
Necrotizing enterocolitis, stage ≥2 A 13 (14.1) 1 (3.2) 1 (50.0) 0.07
Postnatal steroid exposure 17 (18.5) 9 (29.0) 1 (50.0) 0.29
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia 34 (37.4) 17 (54.8) 1 (50.0) 0.23
Total parenteral nutrition 84 (90.3) 28 (90.3) 2 (100.0) 0.90
Age of commencing enteral feed (hours) 3.8 [2.5, 5.5] 3.5 [2.7, 5.6] 15.1 [10.0, NA] 0.13
Duration of parenteral nutrition (days) 6.0 [4.0, 10.0] 7.0 [4.5, 9.5] 8.5 [5.0, NA] 0.92
Age of achieving enteral feeding 120 mL/kg/day (days) 6.0 [4.0, 10.0] 5.0 [4.3, 7.8] 7.5 [4.0, NA] 0.47
Age of commencing milk fortification (days) 7.0 [5.0, 11.0] 6.0 [5.0, 7.7] 8.0 [5.0, NA] 0.52
Hospital length of stay (days) 57.0 [37.5, 88.0] 69.0 [55.0, 87.0] 146 [39.0, NA] 0.13
Postmenstrual age at discharge (weeks) 39.0 [36.5, 41.0] 39.0 [37.8, 42.3] 46.5 [37.0, 50.0] 0.07
Total vitamin D intake (IU/kg/day)
 Birth to 4 weeks

236.0

[182.1, 312.0]

497.0

[452.2, 552.5]

722.5

[713.1, 730.0]

<0.01*
 5 to 8 weeks

216.3

[168.0, 310.7]

326.1

[224.7, 417.1]

367.0

[324.0, 410.0]

<0.01*
Changes in Z-score from birth to 8 weeks
 Body weight 0.5 [-0.2, 0.9] 0.4 [0.3, 0.7] 0.1 [-0.1, 0.3] 0.79
 Length 0.2 [0.8, -0.8] 0.1 [-0.2, 0.7] -0.1 [-0.3, 0.0] 0.72
 Head circumference 0.6 [-0.6, 1.2] 0.7 [0.1, 1.2] -0.4 [-0.9, 0.1] 0.44
Serum biochemical bone assessment at 8 weeks
 Albumin (g/dL) 3.5 [3.3, 3.7] 3.5 [3.4, 3.7] 3.4 [2.9, 3.8] 0.92
 Total calcium (mg/dL) 9.9 [9.5, 10.2] 9.9 [9.6, 10.1] 10.3 [10.0, 10.6] 0.90
 Phosphorus (mg/dL) 6.2 [5.5, 6.8] 6.3 [5.8, 6.7] 4.9 [4.4, 5.4] 0.23
 Alkaline phosphatase (IU/L)

327.5

[279.0, 411.0]

345.0

[278.0, 403.5]

316.0

[243.0, 389.0]

0.98

Data are presented as n (%), median [25th, 75th percentile], or mean ± standard deviation.

*p < 0.05 is statistically significant.

“NA” not applicable (median cannot be calculated with n = 2; single value shown).

Temporal vitamin D status by intake group and longitudinal serum 25(OH)D concentrations

At 4 weeks, serum 25(OH)D levels were available for 123 infants. In the <400 IU/kg/day group (n = 90), 71 infants (78.9%) had normal levels, 16 (17.8%) had VDD, and 3 (3.3%) had VDE. In the 400–700 IU/kg/day group (n = 31), 28 infants (90.3%) achieved normal levels, 2 (6.5%) had VDD, and 1 (3.2%) developed VDE. At 8 weeks, normal 25(OH)D levels were observed in 73 of 81 infants (90.1%) in the <400 IU/kg/day group and 24 of 31 (77.4%) in the 400–700 IU/kg/day group. The proportion of VDE increased to 8.6% and 22.6% infants in those groups, respectively (Fig. 2and Table 3). The two infants in the >700 IU/kg/day group maintained normal 25(OH)D without VDD or VDE at 4 and 8 weeks. Serum 25(OH)D increased over time in all groups. In the <400 IU/kg/day group, which received a median daily dose of 200 [100, 300] IU/day, serum 25(OH)D rose from 10.2 ng/mL at birth to 35.5 and 67.9 ng/mL at 4 and 8 weeks, respectively. In the 400-700 IU/kg/day group, cord blood 25(OH)D was 8.7 ng/mL, rising to 42.2 ng/mL at 4 weeks and 78 ng/mL at 8 weeks. Nevertheless, serum 25(OH)D concentrations did not differ among the three intake groups at any time point (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3and Supplementary Table 1).

Table 3.

Vitamin D status at 4 and 8 weeks postnatal age by intake group.

Total Vitamin D
Intake,
IU/kg/d
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D
Concentration, ng/mL
At 4 wk
Postnatal Age
At 8 wk
Postnatal Age
<20 ng/mL 20–100 ng/mL >100 ng/mL <20 ng/mL 20–100 ng/mL >100 ng/mL
<400 16 (17.8) 71 (78.9) 3 (3.3) 1 (1.3) 73 (90.1) 7 (8.6)
400–700 2 (6.5) 28 (90.3) 1 (3.2) 0 (0.0) 24 (77.4) 7 (22.6)
>700 0 (0.0) 2 (100.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (100) 0 (0.0)

Data are presented as n (%).

Vitamin D deficiency, <20 ng/mL; normal, 20–100 ng/mL; excess, >100 ng/mL.

Fig. 3. Longitudinal Serum 25(OH)D Concentrations by Vitamin D intake Group.

Fig. 3

Data presented in median [25th, 75th percentile]. Groups are based on average total vitamin D intake (parenteral plus enteral) from birth to 4 weeks. Measurements were obtained at birth (cord blood), 4 weeks, and 8 weeks postnatal age. No significant differences were observed between groups at any time point (p > 0.05). 25(OH)D 25-hydroxyvitamin D.

Growth and biochemical outcomes

Hospital outcomes are summarized in Table 2. Changes in z-scores for weight, length, and head circumference from birth to 8 weeks did not differ significantly between groups. Biochemical markers of bone metabolism; including serum calcium, phosphorus, and alkaline phosphatase, remained within normal ranges at 4 and 8 weeks, and no cases of MBD were observed in any group.

Multivariable analysis and predictive performance

In multivariable logistic regression, male sex was associated with higher odds of persistent VDD at 4 weeks (aOR 15.69; 95% CI, 2.04–120.82; p = 0.008). Higher cumulative vitamin D supplementation during birth to 4 weeks was protective (aOR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98–0.99; p < 0.001), as was greater cord blood 25(OH)D concentration (aOR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51–0.90; p = 0.006) (Supplementary Table 3). The final model showed excellent discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95. When examined individually, the AUCs were 0.37 for male sex, 0.77 for vitamin D supplementation, and 0.85 for cord blood 25(OH)D. The optimal Youden’s index identified a cord blood 25(OH)D cutoff of 8.5 ng/mL for predicting persistent VDD at 4 weeks (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Discussion

VDD is highly prevalent in very preterm infants because inadequate third-trimester transplacental transfer limits fetal accrual of vitamin D. In our cohort, 94.3% had VDD at birth, and 69.1% met criteria for severe VDD, exceeding the 40%–80% reported in international cohorts [5–8]. Median cord blood 25(OH)D was 9.7 [6.6, 14.2] ng/mL, lower than values reported in Thailand and in international studies [5, 6, 17].

Because cord blood 25(OH)D strongly correlates with maternal vitamin D status [3, 4], these findings underscore that maternal VDD remains a major concern in tropical Thailand. Thai studies report suboptimal vitamin D levels in 76–83% of pregnant women [24, 25], reinforcing an urgent need for routine antenatal vitamin D supplementation, already endorsed by international guidelines [26, 27]. However, commercially available antenatal supplements in Thailand currently lack vitamin D, representing a critical gap in perinatal nutritional policy.

Recommendations for vitamin D supplementation in very preterm infants vary widely, ranging from a fixed dose of 200–400 IU/day [14] to weight-based 400–700 IU/kg/day [13]. A national survey of academic and level IV neonatal intensive care units in the USA highlighted substantial practice variation for extremely preterm infants, with most units administering 400 IU/day [15]. We initially followed the earlier AAP guideline of 400 IU/day for very preterm infants [14]. After ESPGHAN updated its recommendations [13], we adopted an individualized approach that allows attending neonatologists to adjust dosing based on serial serum 25(OH)D concentrations from cord blood and at 4 and 8 weeks.

At 4 weeks, 14.6% of infants remained vitamin D deficient, whereas by 8 weeks, a substantial proportion exceeded the upper threshold for optimal 25(OH)D, underscoring the difficulty of maintaining appropriate vitamin D status in this vulnerable population. In multivariable analysis, male sex independently predicted persistent VDD at 4 weeks. The mechanisms are uncertain; however, sex-related differences in neonatal outcomes may reflect variation in body composition, hormonal milieu, or vitamin D–binding protein concentrations [28–30]. Further studies should evaluate whether male infants benefit from tailored supplementation strategies. Conversely, higher cumulative vitamin D intake during the first month significantly reduced the risk of persistent VDD, although excessive intake may predispose to VDE. Cord blood 25(OH)D concentration was also protective, underscoring the importance of antenatal vitamin D transfer. Notably, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis identified a cord blood threshold of 8.5 ng/dL as the optimal cutoff for predicting persistent VDD at 4 weeks. To our knowledge, this threshold has not been previously reported; however, cautious interpretation is warranted because the number of infants with persistent VDD at 4 weeks was small. Collectively, these results suggest that a uniform dosing strategy may be insufficient for all very preterm infants. Individualized supplementation tailored to baseline risk factors and guided by serial serum 25 (OH)D monitoring may therefore represent a safer, more effective approach to optimizing vitamin D status in very preterm infants.

Serum 25(OH)D increased with total vitamin D intake in a dose-dependent manner; however, the risk of VDE rose significantly at >400 IU/kg/day. In the 400–700 IU/kg/day group, 22.6% developed VDE, consistent with reports of increased risk when supplementation exceeds 600 IU/day between 2–10 weeks of age [5, 6, 31]. A fixed-dose regimen of 800 IU/day yielded no VDE in one study [17], whereas another documented only one affected infant [32]. These discrepancies likely reflect differences in dosing strategy, supplementation timing, and population characteristics. Neither our study nor prior reports found significant differences between groups in metabolic bone markers. The consistent absence of group differences suggests that serum 25(OH)D responds more rapidly to supplementation than biochemical indicators of bone health [6, 32, 33]. Early dose adjustments guided by measured serum 25(OH)D may therefore have prevent changes in bone turnover markers or overt MBD.

A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that high-dose vitamin D supplementation (≥800 IU/day) in preterm infants was associated with higher serum 25(OH)D levels and modest improvements in growth velocities, without an increased risk of vitamin D excess [34]. However, we found no significant differences in weight gain, length, or head circumference between groups. These results align with most individual trials, which show no short-term growth benefit from higher dosing. Nonetheless, specific subgroups may benefit from targeted vitamin D strategies; therefore, further research should identify which infants are most likely to show growth responses.

Our findings highlight a narrow therapeutic window for vitamin D supplementation in very preterm infants and underscore the importance of individualized monitoring of serum 25(OH)D concentrations. Strengths of this study include prospective data collection, a relatively large cohort, and comprehensive documentation of parenteral and enteral vitamin D intake throughout the early postnatal period. However, the single-center design within a specific clinical context may limit generalizability to other settings. Feeding protocols, timing of enteral fortification, and total parenteral nutrition practices all vary across institutions and countries; maternal vitamin D status also differs by geography, cultural practices, and public health supplementation policies. These factors should be considered when extrapolating our findings to other neonatal populations. Furthermore, it should be noted that while the operational cut-offs for VDD and VDE used in this study follow standard pediatric guidelines, their clinical meaningfulness in the specific context of preterm infants remains a matter of speculation and requires further validation.

Conclusions

Vitamin D deficiency was present in 94.3% of very preterm infants at birth. Supplementation at <400 IU/kg/day generally normalized 25(OH)D by 8 weeks, whereas higher doses increased the risk of vitamin D excess without additional benefit. Although this dosing appears for most infants, individualized monitoring of serum 25(OH)D remains essential to optimize vitamin D status while avoiding both deficiency and excess.

Supplementary information

Supplemental Material (64.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the families who generously participated in this study and Ms. Juthatip Suwannatrai, a research assistant at the Division of Neonatology, for her dedicated support in patient coordination and data collection.

Author contributions

SW conceptualized and designed the study; collected, interpreted, and analyzed data; and drafted the initial manuscript. PR conceptualized and designed the study and collected data. BY, SN, and RK interpreted and analyzed data, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript. PW conceptualized and designed the study, supervised data collection, critically appraised the data analysis, and critically reviewed and revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This study was supported by the Siriraj Research Development Fund, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand (grant number R016635049) and the Perinatal Society of Thailand. Open access funding provided by Mahidol University.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but may be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics statement

The study was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University (reference: Si 176/2023). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Change history

4/27/2026

The original online version of this article was revised: In the sentence beginning 'The median gestational age...' in this article, the values '[24, 25]' should have read '[27. 31]'.

Change history

5/6/2026

A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41430-026-01759-6

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41430-026-01746-x.

References

  • 1.Abrams SA. Vitamin D and bone minerals in neonates. Early Hum Dev. 2021;162:105461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Agarwal S, Kovilam O, Agrawal DK. Vitamin D and its impact on maternal-fetal outcomes in pregnancy: A critical review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2018;58:755–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rabbani S, Afaq S, Fazid S, Khattak MI, Yousafzai YM, Habib SH, et al. Correlation between maternal and neonatal blood Vitamin D level: Study from Pakistan. Matern Child Nutr. 2021;17:e13028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kassai MS, Cafeo FR, Affonso-Kaufman FA, Suano-Souza FI, Sarni ROS. Vitamin D plasma concentrations in pregnant women and their preterm newborns. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18:412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Adnan M, Wu SY, Khilfeh M, Davis V. Vitamin D status in very low birth weight infants and response to vitamin D intake during their NICU stays: a prospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2022;42:209–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anderson-Berry A, Thoene M, Wagner J, Lyden E, Jones G, Kaufmann M, et al. Randomized trial of two doses of vitamin D3 in preterm infants <32 weeks: Dose impact on achieving desired serum 25(OH)D3 in a NICU population. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0185950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kim I, Kim SS, Song JI, Yoon SH, Park GY, Lee YW. Association between vitamin D level at birth and respiratory morbidities in very-low-birth-weight infants. Korean J Pediatr. 2019;62:166–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zung A, Topf-Olivestone C, Shinwell ES, Hofi L, Juster-Reicher A, Flidel-Rimon O. Reassessing vitamin D supplementation in preterm infants: a prospective study and review of the literature. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2020;33:1273–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chacham S, Pasi R, Chegondi M, Ahmad N, Mohanty SB. Metabolic Bone Disease in Premature Neonates: An Unmet Challenge. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2020;12:332–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Park HW, Lim G, Park YM, Chang M, Son JS, Lee R. Association between vitamin D level and bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0235332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ge H, Liu W, Li H, Zhang M, Zhang M, Liu C, et al. The association of vitamin D and vitamin E levels at birth with bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021;56:2108–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Al-Beltagi M, Rowiesha M, Elmashad A, Elrifaey SM, Elhorany H, Koura HG. Vitamin D status in preterm neonates and the effects of its supplementation on respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2020;55:108–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Embleton ND, Jennifer Moltu S, Lapillonne A, van den Akker CHP, Carnielli V, Fusch C, et al. Enteral Nutrition in Preterm Infants (2022): A Position Paper From the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition and Invited Experts. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023;76:248–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Abrams SA. Committee on N. Calcium and vitamin d requirements of enterally fed preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2013;131:e1676–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Romero-Lopez M, Naik M, Holzapfel LF, Salas AA, Ahmad KA, Rysavy MA, et al. Survey of vitamin D supplementation practices in extremely preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2025;97:1009–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ariyawatkul K, Lersbuasin P. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in cord blood of newborns and the association with maternal vitamin D status. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177:1541–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rueang-Amnat N, Kittisakmontri K, Khuwuthyakorn V, Kosarat S, Manopunya S, Pomrop M. Improving Vitamin D Status in Preterm Newborns: A Randomized Trial of 800 vs. 400 IU/Day. Nutrients. 2025;17:1888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fenton TR, Kim JH. A systematic review and meta-analysis to revise the Fenton growth chart for preterm infants. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP, Marshall R, Barton L, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg. 1978;187:1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jensen EA, Dysart K, Gantz MG, McDonald S, Bamat NA, Keszler M, et al. The Diagnosis of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Very Preterm Infants. An Evidence-based Approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;200:751–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Amrein K, Scherkl M, Hoffmann M, Neuwersch-Sommeregger S, Kostenberger M, Tmava Berisha A, et al. Vitamin D deficiency 2.0: an update on the current status worldwide. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2020;74:1498–513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Munns CF, Shaw N, Kiely M, Specker BL, Thacher TD, Ozono K, et al. Global Consensus Recommendations on Prevention and Management of Nutritional Rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:394–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Abrams SA. Vitamin D in Preterm and Full-Term Infants. Ann Nutr Metab. 2020;76:6–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pratumvinit B, Wongkrajang P, Wataganara T, Hanyongyuth S, Nimmannit A, Chatsiricharoenkul S, et al. Maternal Vitamin D Status and Its Related Factors in Pregnant Women in Bangkok, Thailand. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0131126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Charatcharoenwitthaya N, Nanthakomon T, Somprasit C, Chanthasenanont A, Chailurkit LO, Pattaraarchachai J, et al. Maternal vitamin D status, its associated factors and the course of pregnancy in Thai women. Clin Endocrinol. 2013;78:126–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Demay MB, Pittas AG, Bikle DD, Diab DL, Kiely ME, Lazaretti-Castro M, et al. Vitamin D for the Prevention of Disease: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024;109:1907–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Aghajafari F, Field CJ, Kaplan BJ, Rabi DM, Maggiore JA, O’Beirne M, et al. The Current Recommended Vitamin D Intake Guideline for Diet and Supplements During Pregnancy Is Not Adequate to Achieve Vitamin D Sufficiency for Most Pregnant Women. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wierzbicka A, Oczkowicz M. Sex differences in vitamin D metabolism, serum levels and action. Br J Nutr. 2022;128:2115–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ciarambino T, Crispino P, Minervini G, Giordano M. Vitamin D: Can Gender Medicine Have a Role? Biomedicines. 2023;11:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Workalemahu T, Badon SE, Dishi-Galitzky M, Qiu C, Williams MA, Sorensen T, et al. Placental genetic variations in vitamin D metabolism and birthweight. Placenta. 2017;50:78–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fort P, Salas AA, Nicola T, Craig CM, Carlo WA, Ambalavanan N. A Comparison of 3 Vitamin D Dosing Regimens in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2016;174:132–8.e1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Natarajan CK, Sankar MJ, Agarwal R, Pratap OT, Jain V, Gupta N, et al. Trial of daily vitamin D supplementation in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2014;133:e628–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang Y, Li Z, Yan G, Jie Q, Rui C. Effect of different doses of vitamin D supplementation on preterm infants - an updated meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31:3065–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Shin SH, Kim HJ, Heo JS. Short-term and long-term effects of vitamin D supplementation for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Perinatol. 2026;46:425–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material (64.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but may be obtained from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES