Skip to main content
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1973 May;19(3):481–490. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-481

Shock intensity and duration interactions on free-operant avoidance behavior1

J David Leander
PMCID: PMC1334143  PMID: 16811678

Abstract

Shock intensities (1 to 4 mA) and shock durations (0.3 to 0.75 sec) were concurrently varied over a range commonly used in free-operant avoidance studies using a lever-press response. Response rates were a positive linear function of the log of the product of intensity times duration. Shock rates were a negative linear function of that log. The increase in response rates was primarily due to a selective increase in the conditional probability of making responses with long interresponse times. The disproportionality of receiving shocks early in the session (warm-up) was also a linear function of the log of the intensity-duration product, with increasing disproportionality as the value of the intensity-duration product was increased. Thus, with all measures of the avoidance performance, shock intensity and shock duration combine in a multiplicative fashion to determine the avoidance performance.

Full text

PDF
481

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. BOREN J. J., SIDMAN M., HERRNSTEIN R. J. Avoidance, escape, and extinction as functions of shock intensity. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1959 Aug;52:420–426. doi: 10.1037/h0042727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Church R. M., Raymond G. A., Beauchamp R. D. Response suppression as a function of intensity and duration of a punishment. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Feb;63(1):39–44. doi: 10.1037/h0024174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. HOFFMAN H. S., FLESHLER M., CHORNY H. Discriminated bar-press avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Oct;4:309–316. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Powell R. W. Analysis of warm-up effects during avoidance in wild and domesticated rodents. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1972 Feb;78(2):311–316. doi: 10.1037/h0032191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Powell R. W., Peck S. Running-wheel activity and avoidance in the mongolian gerbil. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):779–787. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-779. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Powell R. W. The effect of shock intensity upon responding under a multiple-avoidance schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3):321–329. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Riess D. Sidman avoidance in rats as a function of shock intensity and duration. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1970 Dec;73(3):481–485. doi: 10.1037/h0030235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. SIDMAN M. Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal. Science. 1953 Aug 7;118(3058):157–158. doi: 10.1126/science.118.3058.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES