Skip to main content
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living logoLink to Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
. 2026 Jun 24;8:1833258. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2026.1833258

Biomechanical mechanisms of early gait training on knee cartilage degeneration after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a study protocol

Ruiqin Dang 1,2,3,†, Yiqun Lu 1,2,3,†, Ziren Zhou 1,2,3, Zheng Zhou 1,2,3, Na Cui 1,2,3, Yuanyuan Yu 1,2,3, Si Zhang 1,2,3, Yingfang Ao 1,2,3, Hongjie Huang 1,2,3, Jianquan Wang 1,2,3, Shuang Ren 1,2,3,*
PMCID: PMC13341869  PMID: 42421839

Abstract

Objective

The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects and biomechanical mechanisms of early gait retraining (GRT) on knee cartilage degeneration following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Methods

This study is a single-blind, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. A total of 60 participants scheduled for primary unilateral ACLR will be recruited and randomly allocated to either the experimental group (conventional rehabilitation plus gait retraining) or the control group (conventional rehabilitation only). Gait retraining will commence at 3 weeks post-surgery, lasting for 6 weeks with a frequency of 2–3 sessions per week, each lasting 15–20 min. Data will be collected at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Assessment will include three-dimensional gait analysis, surface electromyography (sEMG), isokinetic muscle strength testing, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), Y-balance test, single-leg hop test, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Lysholm knee score, and Tegner activity scale. The primary outcome measure is the peak knee flexion moment during walking. Secondary outcomes include cartilage T1ρ/T2 values, muscle activation patterns, and subjective functional scores. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to evaluate the intervention effects on the outcome measures.

Results

Not applicable.

Conclusion

Early gait retraining using a lower-body positive pressure (anti-gravity) treadmill after ACLR is hypothesized to significantly improve postoperative gait biomechanics. Furthermore, early GRT may optimize standard rehabilitation protocols, potentially preventing or delaying cartilage degeneration. This approach holds clinical significance for restoring normal gait and preventing secondary injuries in individuals with sports-related injuries.

Clinical Trial Registration

https:register.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT06368544

Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, cartilage degeneration, gait biomechanics, gait retraining, weight-loss treadmill

Introduction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common and severe sports-related knee injury, accounting for approximately 50% of knee sports injuries (1). ACL rupture can lead to joint instability, disrupt the biomechanical homeostasis of the joint, and impair athletic performance (2, 3).

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is currently the preferred clinical treatment for ACL injuries, effectively restoring the structural stability of the knee joint. However, the re-rupture rate after ACLR exceeds 10% (4, 5), and the risk of developing knee osteoarthritis within 10 years post-surgery remains as high as 50% (6). Abnormal gait biomechanics are considered a significant contributing factor to the development of knee osteoarthritis (7–9). Given that walking is a highly repetitive daily activity, long-term abnormal gait patterns can lead to abnormal stress distribution on articular cartilage (10–12). Over time, this may result in secondary lesions such as cartilage damage and meniscal tears, thereby accelerating cartilage degeneration and the onset and progression of osteoarthritis (13–15).

Current standardized postoperative rehabilitation protocols primarily focus on range of motion, muscle strength, balance, coordination, and functional exercises. Previous studies have found that even when patients regain muscle strength and range of motion to levels sufficient for return-to-sport, abnormal gait biomechanics often persist (10, 16, 17). This indicates that current standardized rehabilitation protocols may be insufficient to fully restore normal gait biomechanics after ACLR, and these persistent abnormalities may adversely influence long-term joint health. Therefore, early gait retraining (GRT) is particularly important. GRT involves the use of various biofeedback modalities to target and modify specific aberrant movement patterns, aiming to restore pre-injury gait patterns (18–20). However, no studies have yet explored the impact of early GRT on gait biomechanics after ACLR.

In summary, there is a lack of evidence regarding the effect of early gait retraining on cartilage degeneration after ACLR. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the effects of early postoperative gait retraining on knee cartilage degeneration and its underlying biomechanical mechanisms through a randomized controlled trial, with the goal of providing a theoretical basis for optimizing postoperative rehabilitation protocols after ACLR.

Methods

Study design

This study is a prospective randomized controlled trial. The experimental group will undergo gait training in addition to standard rehabilitation, while the control group will receive only standard rehabilitation. Both groups will be assessed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Flowchart illustrating a study on ACL reconstruction patients, comparing gait correction training plus standard rehabilitation versus standard rehabilitation alone, with multiple evaluations assessing motor function, gait biomechanics, and biochemical cartilage characteristics to analyze the effects of training on cartilage degeneration and biomechanical mechanisms.

Technical roadmap for the study protocol.

Participants and recruitment

Sample size calculation

The primary outcome measure is the peak knee flexion moment during walking, a key biomechanical indicator of cartilage degeneration (21). A significant difference in this measure will be considered statistically meaningful. Based on preliminary results, the mean peak knee flexion moment before training in ACLR patients is 0.20 BW·BH, with a standard deviation of 0.09. After training, the mean peak knee flexion moment is 0.28 BW·BH, with a standard deviation of 0.11 Nm/kg/m. Using the formula for sample size estimation for two independent samples, n=2σ2(Zα/2+Zβ)2δ2, with α = 0.05 and β = 0.2,among σ=σ12+σ2222, δ=X1¯−X2¯, the required sample size for each group was calculated to be 25.Accounting for a 20% dropout rate, 30 participants per group will be recruited. The required sample size corresponds to a Cohen's d of 0.8, indicating a large effect size.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

A total of 60 patients scheduled for ACLR will be recruited. After enrollment, participant information will be entered into the RED Cap system, and participants will be randomly assigned to two groups (experimental group, n = 30; control group, n = 30) using a mixed block randomization method. This is a single-blind randomized controlled trial; participants will not be informed of their group assignment or the intervention details prior to the intervention. Baseline information and data will be collected preoperatively. After the study procedures have been fully explained and understood, written informed consent will be obtained from all participants at the Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital. All data collection and interventions will be conducted at the same department.

Inclusion Criteria: (1) age 18–35 years; (2) diagnosis of ACL rupture confirmed by MRI; (3) first-time unilateral ACL rupture scheduled for reconstruction at our institution; (4) body mass index (BMI) within the normal range of 18.5–23.9 kg/m2 (to exclude the confounding effect of obesity on joint loading); (5) time since injury less than 6 months; (6) affected knee has passed the acute phase, with no significant swelling, pain, inflammation, or range of motion limitation, and basic joint mobility is restored.

Exclusion Criteria: (1) history of musculoskeletal injury or surgery on the contralateral lower limb; (2) time since ACL injury 6 months; (3) cartilage injury with Outerbridge grade III or IV; (4) concurrent meniscal tear requiring meniscal repair during ACLR; (5) concomitant severe injury to the posterior cruciate ligament, medial collateral ligament, or lateral collateral ligament; (6) presence of metabolic syndrome (obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes, etc.), immune system diseases affecting articular cartilage, or severe cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases; (7) unwillingness to receive the allocated treatment.

Outcome measures

Measurement procedures

Participants will complete baseline information and subjective functional scoring scales (including basic information, IKDC2000 subjective knee function score, Tegner activity level score, Lysholm knee score, pain VAS score, and dominant side questionnaire). Subsequently, bilateral knee MRI (including functional MRI), three-dimensional gait biomechanics, isokinetic muscle strength, and lower limb balance tests will be conducted. All tests will be performed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.

Gait analysis

A 10-camera three-dimensional motion capture system (Vicon) will be used to collect three-dimensional kinematic data during walking at a sampling rate of 100 Hz. Ground reaction forces will be collected synchronously using embedded force plates at a sampling rate of 1,000 Hz. Synchronization between the force plates and the motion capture system will be achieved via a hardware trigger signal. Surface electromyography (EMG) will be used to assess muscle activation levels of the quadriceps, hamstrings, tibialis anterior, and gastrocnemius during walking at a sampling rate of 2,000 Hz. EMG electrodes will be placed according to the SENIAM (Surface ElectroMyoGraphy for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles) recommendations, positioned over the muscle belly and aligned with the muscle fiber direction. Gait biomechanical analysis will be performed using Visual 3D software (C-motion, USA) to calculate three-dimensional kinematics and kinetics of the hip, knee, and ankle joints. Additionally, an Anybody musculoskeletal multibody dynamics model (18 rigid bodies, 92 muscles) will be used to calculate overall knee joint contact forces, anterior-posterior and shear forces, and individual muscle forces using inverse dynamics.

Basic motor function tests

Isokinetic muscle strength test

Isokinetic strength of the knee extensors and flexors will be assessed using a dynamometer (Con-Trex MJ, Fitzmann, Germany). Participants will be securely strapped at the trunk and thigh. The knee will be moved from 90° to 20° flexion (and back) at angular velocities of 60 °/s, 180 °/s, and 300 °/s for concentric and eccentric contractions, following standardized protocols.

Y-balance test

Participants will stand on a single leg with the great toe aligned with the starting line on the testing platform. The other foot will be used to push the testing board as far as possible in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions. The farthest distance reached (accurate to 0.5 cm) will be recorded for each direction, with three repetitions.

Single-leg hop test (to be performed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-surgery)

This includes the single-leg hop, triple single-leg hop, diagonal triple single-leg hop, and 6-meter timed hop. Two formal tests will be performed per participant, and the best result will be recorded. A rest interval of 30 s will be provided between tests.

Lysholm knee score

Lysholm is a quantitative score for daily symptoms and exercise capacity of the knee joint. This scoring system contains eight questions. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function. According to the score results, the functional status of the knee joint of the patient can be evaluated. More than 95 points are excellent, 94–85 points are good, 84–65 points are fair, and less than 65 points are poor (22).

IKDC 2,000 subjective knee score

IKDC 2000 knee subjective rating scale is a widely used tool to evaluate knee function and symptoms, especially for patients after knee injury or surgery (23).The scale assesses the performance of the knee joint in daily activities through patient self-report. The overall score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better knee function.

Tegner activity level score

The Tegner rating scale is a tool commonly used to assess the degree of athletic injury and functional recovery to assess the ability to perform athletic activities after knee injury. The Tegner rating scale is graded on a scale from 0 to 10 based on the level of motor activity participants engage in and the gradual increase in demands (24).

Functional MRI

Early cartilage degeneration may not be detectable on conventional MRI due to the absence of morphological changes; therefore, functional MRI techniques will be used to assess cartilage relaxation times. A GE 750 W 3.0 T MRI scanner will be used to scan bilateral knees. The protocol includes T1ρ and T2 mapping sequences, which reflect cartilage biochemical characteristics (collagen and proteoglycan content). Increases in these values indicate a time-dependent decline in collagen and proteoglycan content, signifying early cartilage degeneration (25–27).The T2 mapping sequence will be performed using a 3D multi-echo fast spin-echo sequence (TR/TE = 9.3/3.7 ms, echo train length = 8). The T1ρ sequence will use a spin-lock pulse (locking frequency = 500 Hz, locking time = 10 ms). Other parameters include: FOV = 16 cm, matrix = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 1 mm, voxel size = 0.625 × 0.625 × 1 mm3, number of slices = 32, and fat suppression technique (SPECIAL). The regions of analysis will include the medial and lateral femoral condyles, femoral trochlea, medial and lateral tibial plateaus, and patellar cartilage, as illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Medical imaging composite showing three gray MRI cross-sections and one 3D-rendered knee joint model, each with colored overlays highlighting distinct anatomical or ligament regions for comparative anatomical analysis.

Schematic representation of cartilage partitions in the knee joint. AI segmentation + manual fine tuning in 21 zones of knee cartilage and VR segmentation effect.

Postoperative gait intervention

Experimental group

Participants in the experimental group will undergo standard postoperative rehabilitation as outlined below. In addition, starting from 3 weeks post-surgery, they will concurrently receive a 6-week gait retraining program using a lower-body positive pressure (LBPP) system (Anti-Gravity Treadmill, AlterG). On days when the gait retraining intervention is performed, the walking training component of the standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol will be omitted. After the gait retraining session, patients will continue with their home-based rehabilitation as per the standard protocol.

The anti-gravity treadmill (AlterG) comprises a lower-body positive pressure (LBPP) chamber and a visual feedback screen. During walking, pneumatic pressure unloads a percentage of body weight, thereby reducing knee joint loading and potentially alleviating pain. The LBPP treadmill has been shown to reduce knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis (28). It provides a relatively safe environment for walking, offering advantages over traditional therapy for the restoration of walking ability, gait correction, and balance improvement (28–30). It integrates the three key elements of walking—loading, stepping, and balance—thereby facilitating the formation of normal gait patterns (29, 31).

The intervention will begin at 3 weeks post-surgery, with sessions conducted 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Each session will last 15–30 min (3 sets × 5–10 min/day, with 90-s rest intervals between sets). Each session will include a 5-min warm-up, followed by 5–10 min of stretching and ice application post-training. During the gait retraining, lower limb orthoses will be removed. Lower limb weight-bearing will be quantitatively and individually adjusted based on the postoperative week and the participant's condition (Table 1). During the gait retraining, the LBPP system's interactive screen will provide real-time feedback on bilateral lower limb weight-bearing and gait posture. The screen will display metrics such as ground reaction force on both feet, stance time, walking speed, step length, and steps per minute. Participants will be instructed to self-adjust their weight-bearing and gait patterns in real-time, using the visual feedback to achieve symmetry between limbs in ground reaction forces, step length, and stance time, with the goal of balanced bilateral weight-bearing throughout the gait cycle (Figure 3).

Table 1.

Gait intervention protocol after ACLR.

Content The first week The second week The third week The fourth week The fifth week The sixth week
Loading degree 30%body weight 50%body weight 65%body weight 80%body weight 100%body weight 100%body weight
Time/time 15 min (3 × 5 min) 15 min (3 × 5 min) 15 min (3 × 5 min) 15 min (3 × 5 min) 1 (3 × 5 min) 15 min (3 × 5 min)
Rest/min 90 s 90 s 90 s 90 s 90 s 90 s
Trequency 3 times/week 3 times/week 3 times/week 3 times/week 3 times/week 3 times/week
Speed Optional comfort speed (does not cause or aggravate pain)
Figure 3.

A person with their face obscured is walking on an AlterG Anti-Gravity Treadmill inside a clinical setting. The treadmill’s screen displays gait analysis data, including session time, bodyweight support percentage, cadence, step length, stance time, and weight distribution for left and right legs.

Gait training combined with weight loss and visual feedback.

Stop Criteria:** The intervention will be terminated if the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score exceeds 4 points during a session, or if knee joint swelling increases by more than 10% compared to pre-session levels. VAS pain scores will be assessed before, during (at rest intervals), and immediately after gait retraining. Knee joint swelling will be assessed before and immediately after gait retraining.

Control group

Participants in the control group will perform the prescribed rehabilitation plan at home. Their rehabilitation status will be monitored through regular online follow-ups, and telephone guidance will be provided if issues arise. After 8 weeks, they will continue the home-based rehabilitation as per the protocol. At each postoperative follow-up visit, the next phase of home-based training will be explained, and precautions will be reviewed.

Both groups will follow the same conventional rehabilitation protocol, with sessions lasting 30 min each, 4–5 times per week. The detailed protocol is presented in Table 2.

Table 2.

Postoperative rehabilitation protocol for ACLR patients.

Postoperative Time Rehabilitation Content Description Number of Repetitions Time (s)
Weeks 1–2 Ankle pump exercise Maximal dorsiflexion for 5 s followed by plantarflexion for 5 s 120 5
Quadriceps contraction Forceful contraction of anterior thigh muscles for 5 s, then relax for 2 s 15 5
Hamstring contraction With knee fully extended, press down forcefully on a pillow placed under the heel 15 5
Straight leg raise Lift leg 15–60° off the bed, hold until exhaustion 10 10
Knee extension exercise Place a pillow under the heel, leaving the knee unsupported; relax muscles completely; mild posterior knee discomfort is normal 2 1,800
Range of motion exercise Seated beside bed with leg hanging; flex knee to target angle and hold for 10 min 1 300
Weight shift training Forward-backward and side-to-side directions 10 3
Single-leg stance balance exercise Stand straight, arms at sides, lift the affected foot and maintain balance 120 5
Week 3 Ankle pump exercise Maximal dorsiflexion for 5 s followed by plantarflexion for 5 s 15 5
Quadriceps contraction Forceful contraction of anterior thigh muscles for 5 s, then relax for 2 s 15 5
Hamstring contraction With knee fully extended, press down forcefully on a pillow placed under the heel 10 10
Straight leg raise Lift leg 30–60° off the bed, hold until exhaustion 2 1,800
Knee extension exercise Place a pillow under the heel, leaving the knee unsupported; relax muscles completely; mild posterior knee discomfort is normal 2 1,800
Range of motion exercise Seated beside bed with leg hanging/seated pushing against wall; flex knee to target angle and hold 1 300
Single-leg stance balance exercise Stand straight, arms at sides, lift the affected foot and maintain balance 120 5
Stepping exercise Stand straight, hands at sides, march in place 1 180
Walking exercise Walk in front of a mirror, correcting abnormal gait patterns 1 180
Week 4 Straight leg raise Lift leg 30–60° off the bed, hold until exhaustion 2 1,800
Knee extension exercise Place a pillow under the heel, leaving the knee unsupported; relax muscles completely; mild posterior knee discomfort is normal 2 1,800
Range of motion exercise Seated beside bed with leg hanging/seated pushing against wall; flex knee to target angle and hold 1 300
Single-leg stance balance exercise Stand straight, arms at sides, lift the affected foot and maintain balance 120 5
High-knee marching exercise Stand straight, hands at sides, march with high knees 1 180
Walking exercise Walk in front of a mirror, correcting abnormal gait patterns 1 300
Week 5 Resisted straight leg raise With knee extended, lift leg 30–60° off the bed using an elastic band, hold until exhaustion 2 1,800
Weighted knee extension exercise Place a pillow under the heel, leaving the knee unsupported; relax muscles completely; a sandbag may be placed above the knee; mild posterior knee discomfort is normal 2 1,800
Range of motion exercise Seated, hold the knee to chest; flex to target angle and hold 1 300
Single-leg stance balance exercise Stand straight, arms at sides, lift the affected foot and maintain balance 120 5
Step-up with healthy leg support Healthy leg supports; affected leg rests on step, slowly perform stepping-up motion 15 3
Reverse lunge with healthy leg Stand straight with hands on hips, affected leg flexed at 90°, healthy leg steps back and kneels down 15 5
High-knee marching exercise Stand straight, hands at sides, march with high knees 1 300
Walking exercise Walk in front of a mirror, correcting abnormal gait patterns 2 300
Week 6 Resisted straight leg raise With knee extended, lift leg 30–60° off the bed using an elastic band, hold until exhaustion 2 1,800
Knee extension exercise Place a pillow under the heel, leaving the knee unsupported; relax muscles completely; a sandbag may be placed above the knee; mild posterior knee discomfort is normal 2 1,800
Range of motion exercise Seated, hold the knee to chest; flex to target angle and hold 1 300
Single-leg stance balance exercise Stand straight, arms at sides, lift the affected foot and maintain balance 120 5
Stepping exercise Stand straight, hands at sides, march in place 1 180
Step-down with affected leg support Affected leg stands on step maintaining balance; healthy leg lowers down, touching the floor gently with the heel 15 3
Reverse lunge with healthy leg Stand straight with hands on hips, affected leg flexed at 90°, healthy leg steps back and kneels down 15 5
Fast walking exercise Walk in front of a mirror, correcting abnormal gait patterns 1 300
Week 7 Bilateral squat angle training Symmetrical weight-bearing on both lower limbs; train knee flexion angle and lower limb strength through squatting 1 900
Backward step-up with affected leg support Affected leg performs single-leg support; healthy leg steps backward onto a step 20 3
Supine weighted straight leg raise Supine, lift straight leg upward with resistance provided by a sandbag 15 10
Prone weighted hamstring curl Prone, flex the knee against resistance provided by a sandbag 15 10
Wall squat exercise Squat against a wall in a pain-free range; ensure knees do not extend beyond toes 5 40
Forward lunge with affected leg Stand straight with hands on hips, healthy leg flexed at 90°, affected leg steps back and kneels down 5 5
Fast walking exercise Walk in front of a mirror, correcting abnormal gait patterns 2 300
Week 8 Bilateral squat angle training Symmetrical weight-bearing on both lower limbs; train knee flexion angle and lower limb strength through squatting 1 900
Supine weighted straight leg raise Supine, lift straight leg upward with resistance provided by a sandbag 15 10
Prone weighted hamstring curl Prone, flex the knee against resistance provided by a sandbag 15 10
Wall squat exercise Squat against a wall in a pain-free range; ensure knees do not extend beyond toes 5 40
Fast walking exercise Walk in front of a mirror, correcting abnormal gait patterns 2 300
Weeks 9–3 months Wall squat exercise Squat against a wall in a pain-free range; ensure knees do not extend beyond toes 5 40
Bilateral countermovement jump Squat bilaterally then jump upward and land 15 3
Single-leg countermovement jump (affected side) Squat on affected leg then jump upward and land 10 3
Standing resisted leg raise with elastic band Standing, perform leg raises in multiple directions against elastic band resistance 15 10
Fast walking exercise Walk in front of a mirror, correcting abnormal gait patterns 2 300

Statistical analysis

The primary analysis will employ a mixed-effects model to account for within-subject correlations across repeated measures during the 2-year follow-up and to handle potentially missing data at random. All statistical tests will be performed with a significance level set at α = 0.05. A repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to evaluate the interaction effects between group (experimental vs. control) and time (baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years) on cartilage biochemical characteristics derived from functional MRI (T1ρ/T2 values) and on gait parameters. For multiple comparisons, the Bonferroni correction will be applied. For EMG data, repeated-measures ANOVA will be used to assess the differences in muscle activation patterns before and after gait retraining, thereby exploring the neuromuscular control mechanisms underlying the effects of gait retraining on gait biomechanics. To control the false discovery rate (FDR) when comparing MRI parameters across 10 cartilage subregions and multiple time points, the FDR method will be applied with the threshold set at 0.05. Missing data will be assumed to be missing at random (MAR) and will be addressed using the mixed-effects model without imputation or deletion. For the analysis populations, the primary analysis will follow the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle, including all participants as originally randomized. Sensitivity analysis will be performed using a per-protocol (PP) set, including only participants who completed the full intervention and all follow-up assessments. Effect sizes will be reported as partial eta-squared (η2). Outliers, defined as values exceeding ±3 standard deviations from the group mean, will be excluded and reanalyzed in a sensitivity analysis.

Statement of ethics and consent to participate

The National Bioethics Committee's Review Board granted ethical approval for this research with human participants. Written informed consent will be obtained from all study participants.

Discussion

Current standardized rehabilitation protocols following ACLR primarily focus on restoring muscle strength, range of motion, and neuromuscular coordination. However, even if these indicators return to normal, abnormal gait biomechanical characteristics still cannot be completely corrected, and specific GRT should be added to restore gait. Therefore, this study aims to address the gap in incorporating specific GRT into post-ACLR rehabilitation programs. By investigating whether GRT can optimize standard rehabilitation, we hope to provide a strategy for preventing or delaying the occurrence and progression of cartilage degeneration. This has important clinical implications for helping athletes and active individuals restore normal gait and prevent secondary injuries.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. Beijing Natural Science Foundation grant (L241073) and Clinical Key Projects of Peking University Third Hospital (BYSY2022058).

Footnotes

Edited by: Wei Yin, New Jersey Institute of Technology, United States

Reviewed by: Nadhir Hammami, University of Jendouba, Tunisia

Michelangelo Palco, Casa di Cura Caminiti, Italy

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by Peking Universiy Third Hospital Medical Science Research Ethics Committee. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation in this study was provided by the participants' legal guardians/next of kin.

Author contributions

RD: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Methodology, Investigation. YL: Investigation, Methodology, Data curation, Writing – original draft. ZiZ: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. ZhZ: Data curation, Writing – original draft. CN: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis, Validation. YY: Methodology, Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. SZ: Data curation, Writing – original draft. YA: Writing – review & editing, Methodology. HH: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Resources, Supervision. JW: Resources, Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – review & editing. SR: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Resources.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Musahl V, Karlsson J. Anterior cruciate ligament tear. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380(24):2341–8. 10.1056/NEJMcp1805931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Myer GD, Paterno MV, Ford KR, Hewett TE. Neuromuscular training techniques to target deficits before return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Strength Condition Res. (2008) 22(3):987–1014. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31816a86cd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kiapour AM, Murray MM. Basic science of anterior cruciate ligament injury and repair. Bone Joint Res. (2014) 3(2):20–31. 10.1302/2046-3758.32.2000241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Magnussen RA, Lawrence JT, West RL, Toth AP, Taylor DC, Garrett WE. Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy. (2012) 28(4):526–31. 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shelbourne KD, Sullivan AN, Bohard K, Gray T, Urch SE. Return to basketball and soccer after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in competitive school-aged athletes. Sports Health. (2009) 1(3):236–41. 10.1177/1941738109334275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hart HF, Culvenor AG, Collins NJ, Ackland DC, Cowan SM, Machotka Z, et al. Knee kinematics and joint moments during gait following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. (2016) 50(10):597–612. 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094797 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang LJ, Zeng N, Yan ZP, Li J-T, Ni G-X. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis following ACL injury. Arthritis Res Ther. (2020) 22(1):57. 10.1186/s13075-020-02156-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Webster KE, Hewett TE. Anterior cruciate ligament injury and knee osteoarthritis: an Umbrella systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Sport Med. (2022) 32(2):145–52. 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lien-Iversen T, Morgan DB, Jensen C, Risberg MA, Engebretsen L, Viberg B. Does surgery reduce knee osteoarthritis, meniscal injury and subsequent complications compared with non-surgery after ACL rupture with at least 10 years follow-up? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. (2020) 54(10):592–8. 10.1136/bjsports-2019-100765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Arhos EK, Capin JJ, Buchanan TS, Snyder-Mackler L. Quadriceps strength symmetry does not modify gait mechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, rehabilitation, and return-to-sport training. Am J Sports Med. (2021) 49(2):417–25. 10.1177/0363546520980079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Butler RJ, Minick KI, Ferber R, Underwood F. Gait mechanics after ACL reconstruction: implications for the early onset of knee osteoarthritis. Br J Sports Med. (2009) 43(5):366–70. 10.1136/bjsm.2008.052522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Shi H, Huang H, Ren S, Yu Y, Liang Z, Wang Q, et al. The relationship between quadriceps strength asymmetry and knee biomechanics asymmetry during walking in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Gait Posture. (2019) 73:74–9. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.07.151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Andriacchi TP, Briant PL, Bevill SL, Koo S. Rotational changes at the knee after ACL injury cause cartilage thinning. Clin Orthopaed Relat Res. (2006) 442:39–44. 10.1097/01.blo.0000197079.26600.09 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chaudhari AM, Briant PL, Bevill SL, Koo S, Andriacchi TP. Knee kinematics, cartilage morphology, and osteoarthritis after ACL injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2008) 40(2):215–22. 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815cbb0e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Andriacchi TP, Koo S, Scanlan SF. Gait mechanics influence healthy cartilage morphology and osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. (2009) 91(Suppl 1):95–101. 10.2106/JBJS.H.01408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ren S, Liu X, Li H, Guo Y, Zhang Y, Liang Z, et al. Identification of kinetic abnormalities in male patients after anterior cruciate ligament deficiency combined with meniscal injury: a musculoskeletal model study of lower limbs during jogging. Bioengineering. (2022) 9(11):716. 10.3390/bioengineering9110716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ren S, Shi H, Yu Y, Liang Z, Jiang Y, Wang Q, et al. Dynamic between-leg differences while walking in anterior cruciate ligament–deficient patients with and without medial meniscal posterior horn tears. Orthop J Sports Med. (2020) 8(5):2325967120919058. 10.1177/2325967120919058 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Crowell HP, Davis IS. Gait retraining to reduce lower extremity loading in runners. Clin Biomech. (2011) 26(1):78–83. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.09.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heiderscheit BC, Chumanov ES, Michalski MP, Wille CM, Ryan MB. Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2011) 43(2):296–302. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ebedf4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Li X, Yu J, Bai J, Huang H, Ying S, Wang A, et al. The effect of real-time tibial acceleration feedback on running biomechanics during gait retraining: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Rehabil. (2023) 32(4):449–61. 10.1123/jsr.2022-0279 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Williams JR, Neal K, Alfayyadh A, Capin JJ, Khandha A, Manal K, et al. Patellofemoral contact forces and knee gait mechanics 3 months after ACL reconstruction are associated with cartilage degradation 24 months after surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. (2023) 31(1):96–105. 10.1016/j.joca.2022.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR. The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee. Am J Sports Med. (2009) 37(5):890–7. 10.1177/0363546508330143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ, Harrast JJ. The international knee documentation committee subjective knee evaluation form. Am J Sports Med. (2006) 34(1):128–35. 10.1177/0363546505280214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paxton EW, Fithian DC, Stone ML, Silva P. The reliability and validity of knee-specific and general health instruments in assessing acute patellar dislocation outcomes. Am J Sports Med. (2003) 31(4):487–92. 10.1177/03635465030310040201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li X, Kuo D, Theologis A, Carballido-Gamio J, Stehling C, Link TM, et al. Cartilage in anterior cruciate ligament–reconstructed knees: MR imaging T1ρ and T2—initial experience with 1-year follow-up. Radiology. (2011) 258(2):505–14. 10.1148/radiol.10101006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zarins ZA, Bolbos RI, Pialat JB, Link TM, Li X, Souza RB, et al. Cartilage and meniscus assessment using T1rho and T2 measurements in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. (2010) 18(11):1408–16. 10.1016/j.joca.2010.07.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stahl R, Luke A, Li X, Carballido-Gamio J, Ma CB, Majumdar S, et al. T1rho, T2 and focal knee cartilage abnormalities in physically active and sedentary healthy subjects versus early OA patients—a 3.0-Tesla MRI study. Eur Radiol. (2009) 19(1):132–43. 10.1007/s00330-008-1107-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Takacs J, Anderson JE, Leiter JRS, MacDonald PB, Peeler JD. Lower body positive pressure: an emerging technology in the battle against knee osteoarthritis? Clin Interv Aging. (2013) 8:983–91. 10.2147/CIA.S46951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li L, Rong W, Ke Z, Hu X, Yip SP, Tong KY. Muscle activation changes during body weight support treadmill training after focal cortical ischemia: a rat hindlimb model. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. (2011) 21(2):318–26. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2010.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kurz MJ, Corr B, Stuberg W, Volkman KG, Smith N. Evaluation of lower body positive pressure supported treadmill training for children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. (2011) 23(3):232–9. 10.1097/PEP.0b013e318227b737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D. A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait. J Rehabil Res Dev. (2000) 37(6):701–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Sports and Active Living are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES