Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1994 Jul;62(1):109–132. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.62-109

Within-session changes in responding during several simple schedules

Frances K McSweeney, John M Roll, Jeffrey N Weatherly
PMCID: PMC1334370  PMID: 16812736

Abstract

Pigeons' key pecking was reinforced by food delivered by several fixed-interval, variable-ratio, and differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules. Rate of responding, number of responses per reinforcer, length of postreinforcement pause, running response rate, and the time required to collect an available reinforcer changed systematically within sessions when the schedules provided high rates of reinforcement, but usually not when they provided low rates. These results suggest that the factors that produce within-session changes in responding are generally similar for different schedules of reinforcement. However, a separate factor may also contribute during variable-ratio schedules. The results question explanations for within-session changes that are related solely to the passage of time, to responding, and to one interpretation of attention. They support the idea that one or more factors related to reinforcement play a role.

Keywords: within-session responding, fixed-interval schedule, variable-ratio schedule, differential reinforcement of low rates of responding, response rate, postreinforcement pause, responses per reinforcer, key peck, pigeon

Full text

PDF
109

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baum W. M. Performances on ratio and interval schedules of reinforcement: Data and theory. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Mar;59(2):245–264. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. COLLIER G. Consummatory and instrumental responding as functions of deprivation. J Exp Psychol. 1962 Oct;64:410–414. doi: 10.1037/h0044157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. COLLIER G., MYERS L. The loci of reinforcement. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Jan;61:57–66. doi: 10.1037/h0048851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. COLLIER G. Some properties of saccharin as a reinforcer. J Exp Psychol. 1962 Aug;64:184–191. doi: 10.1037/h0048795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Catania A. C., Reynolds G. S. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-s327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lowe C. F., Harzem P., Spencer P. T. Temporal control of behavior and the power law. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 May;31(3):333–343. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McSweeney F. K., Hinson J. M. Patterns of responding within sessions. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Jul;58(1):19–36. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McSweeney F. K., Roll J. M. Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):621–640. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Palya W. L. Dynamics in the fine structure of schedule-controlled behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):267–287. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. STADDON J. E. SOME PROPERTIES OF SPACED RESPONDING IN PIGEONS. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jan;8:19–27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schneider B. A. A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):677–687. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1969.12-677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Staddon J. E. Attention and temporal discrimination: factors controlling responding under a cyclic-interval schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jul;10(4):349–359. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1967.10-349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Timberlake W., Gawley D. J., Lucas G. A. Time horizons in rats foraging for food in temporally separated patches. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1987 Jul;13(3):302–309. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Timberlake W. The application of the matching law to simple ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):215–217. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES