Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1995 Mar;63(2):203–224. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-203

Contrast and reallocation of extraneous reinforcers as a function of component duration and baseline rate of reinforcement

Anthony P McLean
PMCID: PMC1334397  PMID: 16812757

Abstract

Four pigeons responded on multiple schedules arranged on a “main” key in a two-key experimental chamber. A constant schedule component was alternated with another component that was varied over conditions. On an extra response key, conjoint schedules of reinforcement that operated in both components were arranged concurrently with the multiple schedule on the main key. On the main key, changes in reinforcement rate in the varied component were inversely related to changes in response rates in the constant component (behavioral contrast). On the extra key, some reinforcers were reallocated between components, depending on the schedules in effect on the main key in the varied component. In the varied component, the obtained rates of reinforcement on the extra key were inversely related to main-key reinforcement rate. In the constant component, extra-key reinforcer rates were positively related to main-key reinforcer rates obtained in the varied component, and were not a function of response rates on the extra key. In two comparisons, the rate at which components alternated and the value of the main-key schedule in the constant component were varied. Consistent with earlier work, long components reduced the extent of contrast. Reductions in contrast as a function of component duration were accompanied by similar reductions in the extent of reinforcer reallocation on the extra key. In the second comparison, lowering the rate of reinforcement in the constant component increased the rate at which extra-key reinforcers were obtained, reduced the extent of reinforcer reallocation, and reduced contrast. Overall, the results are consistent with the suggestion that some contrast effects are due to the changes in extraneous reinforcement during the constant component, and that manipulations of component duration, and manipulations of the rate of reinforcement in the constant component, affect contrast because they influence the extent of extraneous reinforcer real-location.

Keywords: behavioral contrast, reallocation hypothesis, extraneous reinforcers, component duration, component value, multiple schedules, concurrent schedules, key peck, pigeons

Full text

PDF
203

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baum W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):231–242. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. CATANIA A. C. Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:253–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harper D. N., McLean A. P. Resistance to change and the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):317–337. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McLean A. P. Contrast and reallocation of extraneous reinforcers between multiple-schedule components. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):497–511. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. McLean A. P. Local contrast in behavior allocation during multiple-schedule components. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):81–96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. McLean A. P. Successive independence of multiple-schedule component performances. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jan;49(1):117–141. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.49-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. McLean A. P., White K. G. Temporal constraint on choice: Sensitivity and bias in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 May;39(3):405–426. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McSweeney F. K., Melville C. L. Behavioral contrast for key pecking as a function of component duration when only one component varies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Sep;60(2):331–343. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. McSweeney F. K., Norman W. D. Defining behavioral contrast for multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Nov;32(3):457–461. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1979.32-457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McSweeney F. K. Positive and negative contrast as a function of component duration for key pecking and treadle pressing. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Mar;37(2):281–293. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nevin J. A., Mandell C., Atak J. R. The analysis of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):49–59. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nevin J. A. Response strength in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 May;21(3):389–408. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pliskoff S. S. Effects of symmetrical and asymmetrical changeover delays on concurrent performances. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):249–256. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. REYNOLDS G. S. Some limitations on behavioral contrast and induction during successive discrimination. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jan;6:131–139. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rachlin H., Baum W. M. Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter? J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):231–241. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Spealman R. D., Gollub L. R. Behavioral interactions in multiple variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Nov;22(3):471–481. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. White K. G., Alsop B., McLean A. P. Successive independence and behavioral contrast in a closed economy. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Sep;58(2):313–323. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Williams B. A. Another look at contrast in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):345–384. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.39-345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Williams B. A. Contrast, component duration, and the following schedule of reinforcement. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1979 Oct;5(4):379–396. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.5.4.379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Williams B. A., Wixted J. T. An equation for behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 Jan;45(1):47–62. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Williams B. A., Wixted J. T. Shortcomings of the behavioral competition theory of contrast: Reanalysis of McLean (1992). J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):107–112. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES