Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1994 Mar;61(2):191–201. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-191

A behavioral economic analysis of concurrently available money and cigarettes.

R J DeGrandpre 1, W K Bickel 1, S T Higgins 1, J R Hughes 1
PMCID: PMC1334407  PMID: 8169568

Abstract

In economic terms, consumption of a reinforcer is determined by its price and the availability and price of other reinforcers. This study examined the effects of response-requirement (i.e., price) manipulations on the self-administration of two concurrently available reinforcers. Six cigarette smokers participated in 4-hr sessions in which money and puffs on a cigarette were concurrently available according to fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. Once stable responding was obtained with both reinforcers available at Fixed Ratio 100, the response requirement for one reinforcer was systematically varied (Fixed Ratio 1,000 and 2,500), while the other reinforcer remained scheduled at Fixed Ratio 100. Increasing the fixed-ratio size for a reinforcer decreased its consumption, with a greater decrease occurring for monetary reinforcement. This finding was quantified in economic terms as own-price elasticity, with elasticity coefficients greater for money than cigarettes. The effects of fixed-ratio size on response output also differed across the two reinforcers. Although greater responding occurred for money at Fixed Ratio 100, increases in fixed-ratio size (for money) decreased responding for money, whereas the same increase in fixed-ratio size (for puffs) increased responding for puffs. Finally, increasing the fixed-ratio size for one reinforcer had little effect on consumption of the other concurrently available reinforcer. This finding was quantified as cross-price elasticity, with elasticity coefficients near 0.0 for most subjects, indicating little or no reinforcer interaction. The results indicate that the reinforcing effects of cigarettes and money in the setting studied here differed, and that the effects produced by changing the price of one reinforcer did not interact with the consumption of the other concurrently available reinforcer.

Full text

PDF
191

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bickel W. K., DeGrandpre R. J., Higgins S. T., Hughes J. R. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. I. Functional equivalence of response requirement and drug dose. Life Sci. 1990;47(17):1501–1510. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90178-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bickel W. K., DeGrandpre R. J., Hughes J. R., Higgins S. T. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. II. A unit-price analysis of cigarette smoking. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):145–154. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.55-145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bickel W. K., Hughes J. R., DeGrandpre R. J., Higgins S. T., Rizzuto P. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. IV. The effects of response requirement on the consumption of and interaction between concurrently available coffee and cigarettes. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1992;107(2-3):211–216. doi: 10.1007/BF02245139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Carroll M. E. The economic context of drug and non-drug reinforcers affects acquisition and maintenance of drug-reinforced behavior and withdrawal effects. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993 Sep;33(2):201–210. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90061-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. DeGrandpre R. J., Bickel W. K., Hughes J. R., Higgins S. T. Behavioral economics of drug self-administration. III. A reanalysis of the nicotine regulation hypothesis. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1992;108(1-2):1–10. doi: 10.1007/BF02245277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. DeGrandpre R. J., Bickel W. K., Hughes J. R., Layng M. P., Badger G. Unit price as a useful metric in analyzing effects of reinforcer magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 Nov;60(3):641–666. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. DeGrandpre R. J., Bickel W. K., Rizvi S. A., Hughes J. R. Effects of income on drug choice in humans. J Exp Anal Behav. 1993 May;59(3):483–500. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Elsmore T. F., Fletcher G. V., Conrad D. G., Sodetz F. J. Reduction of heroin intake in baboons by an economic constraint. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1980 Nov;13(5):729–731. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(80)90018-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldberg S. R., Hoffmeister F., Schlichting U. U., Wuttke W. A comparison of pentobarbital and cocaine self-administration in rhesus monkeys: effects of dose and fixed-ratio parameter. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1971 Nov;179(2):277–283. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Griffiths R. R., Bigelow G. E., Liebson I. Facilitation of human tobacco self-administration by ethanol: a behavioral analysis. J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 May;25(3):279–292. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Griffiths R. R., Henningfield J. E., Bigelow G. E. Human cigarette smoking: manipulation of number of puffs per bout, interbout interval and nicotine dose. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1982 Feb;220(2):256–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Griffiths R. R., Wurster R. M., Brady J. V. Choice between food and heroin: effects of morphine, naloxone, and secobarbital. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 May;35(3):335–351. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Henningfield J. E., Goldberg S. R. Nicotine as a reinforcer in human subjects and laboratory animals. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1983 Dec;19(6):989–992. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(83)90405-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Higgins S. T., Budney A. J., Bickel W. K., Hughes J. R., Foerg F., Badger G. Achieving cocaine abstinence with a behavioral approach. Am J Psychiatry. 1993 May;150(5):763–769. doi: 10.1176/ajp.150.5.763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hursh S. R. Behavioral economics. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):435–452. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Hursh S. R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):219–238. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hursh S. R., Raslear T. G., Shurtleff D., Bauman R., Simmons L. A cost-benefit analysis of demand for food. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Nov;50(3):419–440. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1988.50-419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Johanson C. E., Schuster C. R. A choice procedure for drug reinforcers: cocaine and methylphenidate in the rhesus monkey. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975 May;193(2):676–688. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Katz J.L. Models of relative reinforcing efficacy of drugs and their predictive utility. Behav Pharmacol. 1990;1(4):283–301. doi: 10.1097/00008877-199000140-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lea S. E., Roper T. J. Demand for food on fixed-ratio schedules as a function of the quality of concurrently available reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Mar;27(2):371–380. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1977.27-371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nader M. A., Woolverton W. L. Effects of increasing the magnitude of an alternative reinforcer on drug choice in a discrete-trials choice procedure. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1991;105(2):169–174. doi: 10.1007/BF02244304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nader M.A., Woolverton W.L. Choice between cocaine and food by rhesus monkeys: effects of conditions of food availability. Behav Pharmacol. 1992 Dec;3(6):635–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Perkins K. A., Epstein L. H., Grobe J., Fonte C. Tobacco abstinence, smoking cues, and the reinforcing value of smoking. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994 Jan;47(1):107–112. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)90118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Samson H. H., Lindberg K. Comparison of sucrose-sucrose to sucrose-ethanol concurrent responding in the rat: reinforcement schedule and fluid concentration effects. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1984 Jun;20(6):973–977. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(84)90025-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Schelling T. C. Addictive drugs: the cigarette experience. Science. 1992 Jan 24;255(5043):430–433. doi: 10.1126/science.1734519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Vuchinich R. E., Tucker J. A. Behavioral theories of choice as a framework for studying drinking behavior. J Abnorm Psychol. 1983 Nov;92(4):408–416. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.92.4.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES