Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1994 May;61(3):505–516. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-505

Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength

Gene M Heyman, Michael M Monaghan
PMCID: PMC1334436  PMID: 16812733

Abstract

This experiment investigated the relationship between reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and response rate. The purpose was to evaluate the behavior of two parameters of an equation that predicts absolute response rate as a function of reinforcement rate and two free parameters. According to Herrnstein's (1970) theory of reinforced behavior, one parameter of this “response-strength equation” measures the efficacy of the reinforcer maintaining responding and the other parameter measures motoric components of response rate, such as response duration. Seven rats served as subjects. Experimental sessions consisted of a series of five different variable-interval schedules of reinforcement, each in effect for 5 minutes. Within each session, obtained reinforcement rates varied over more than a 30-fold range, from about 20 per hour to 700 per hour. The reinforcer was sucrose solution, and, between sessions, its concentration was varied from 0.0 to 0.64 molar (0 to 21.9%). For sucrose concentrations of 0.16 to 0.64 m, response rate was a negatively accelerated function of reinforcement rate. Increases in sucrose concentration increased response rates maintained by low but not high reinforcement rates. This pattern of changes corresponds to a change in the reinforcement-efficacy parameter of the response-strength equation. In contrast, the motor-performance parameter did not change as a function of sucrose concentration. These findings are inconsistent with the results of a similar study (Bradshaw, Szabadi, & Bevan, 1978) but support Herrnstein's theory of reinforced behavior.

Keywords: reinforced behavior, reinforcer magnitude, matching law, response-strength equation, behavior theory, sucrose concentration, variable-interval schedule, lever press, rats

Full text

PDF
505

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bradshaw C. M., Ruddle H. V., Szabadi E. Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: II. Effect of the volume of sucrose reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 May;35(3):263–269. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1981.35-263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bradshaw C. M., Szabadi E., Bevan P. Relationship between response rate and reinforcement frequency in variable-interval schedules: the effect of the concentration of sucrose reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 May;29(3):447–452. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1978.29-447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Catania A. C. Self-inhibiting effects of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 May;19(3):517–526. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FLESHLER M., HOFFMAN H. S. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. GUTTMAN N. Equal-reinforcement values for sucrose and glucose solutions compared with equal-sweetness values. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Oct;47(5):358–361. doi: 10.1037/h0062710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamilton A. L., Stellar J. R., Hart E. B. Reward, performance, and the response strength method in self-stimulating rats: validation and neuroleptics. Physiol Behav. 1985 Dec;35(6):897–904. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90257-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrnstein R. J. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.13-243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Heyman G. M. A parametric evaluation of the hedonic and motoric effects of drugs: pimozide and amphetamine. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Sep;40(2):113–122. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1983.40-113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Heyman G. M. Effects of methylphenidate on response rate and measures of motor performance and reinforcement efficacy. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1992;109(1-2):145–152. doi: 10.1007/BF02245492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. McDowell J. J., Wood H. M. Confirmation of linear system theory prediction: Changes in Herrnstein's k as a function of changes in reinforcer magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):183–192. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1984.41-183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Nissenbaum J. W., Sclafani A. Sham-feeding response of rats to Polycose and sucrose. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987 Summer;11(2):215–222. doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80029-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Petry N. M., Heyman G. M. Effects of qualitatively different reinforcers on the parameters of the response-strength equation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jan;61(1):97–106. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1994.61-97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Porter J. H., Villanueva H. F. Assessment of pimozide's motor and hedonic effects on operant behavior in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988 Dec;31(4):779–786. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90383-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. WILKINSON G. N. Statistical estimations in enzyme kinetics. Biochem J. 1961 Aug;80:324–332. doi: 10.1042/bj0800324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES