Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior logoLink to Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
. 1995 May;63(3):331–346. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-331

The effects of differing response-force requirements on fixed-ratio responding of rats.

K Alling 1, A Poling 1
PMCID: PMC1334449  PMID: 7751836

Abstract

Rats were exposed to two-component multiple schedules of food delivery. In the first experiment, 15 responses were required to produce food in both components. A downward force of 0.25 N (25 g) was always required to operate the response lever in one component. In the other, the required force was 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, or 2.00 N (25, 50, 100, or 200 g). In the second experiment, 0.25 N of force operated the lever in one component, but in the other, the force requirement for five consecutive responses at the beginning, middle, or end of each ratio was increased from 0.25 to 2.00 N. In the third experiment, the number of responses required to produce food was reduced from 15 to 5, and then to 1. Again, the effects of altering response force from 0.25 to 2.00 N were examined. In general, as response force increased in all experiments, mean response rates decreased and mean interresponse times increased.

Full text

PDF
331

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AZRIN N. H. Punishment and recovery during fixed-ratio performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Oct;2:301–305. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1959.2-301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. AZRIN N. H. Sequential effects of punishment. Science. 1960 Feb 26;131(3400):605–606. doi: 10.1126/science.131.3400.605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. AZRIN N. H. Time-out from positive reinforcement. Science. 1961 Feb 10;133(3450):382–383. doi: 10.1126/science.133.3450.382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Adair E. R., Wright B. A. Behavioral thermoregulation in the squirrel monkey when response effort is varied. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1976 Feb;90(2):179–184. doi: 10.1037/h0077197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. BRETHOWER D. M., REYNOLDS G. S. A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:191–199. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1962.5-191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. CHUNG S. H. EFFECTS OF EFFORT ON RESPONSE RATE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Jan;8:1–7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Church R. M., Raymond G. A. Influence of the schedule of positive reinforcement on punished behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967 Apr;63(2):329–332. doi: 10.1037/h0024382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Courtney K., Perone M. Reductions in shock frequency and response effort as factors in reinforcement by timeout from avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 Nov;58(3):485–496. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.58-485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Crossman E. K., Heaps R. S., Nunes D. L., Alferink L. A. The effects of number of responses on pause length with temporal variables controlled. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jul;22(1):115–120. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. DARDANO J. F., SAUERBRUNN D. AN AVERSIVE STIMULUS AS A CORRELATED BLOCK COUNTER IN FR PERFORMANCE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:37–43. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. DARDANO J. F., SAUERBRUNN D. SELECTIVE PUNISHMENT OF FIXED-RATIO PERFORMANCE. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 May;7:255–260. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dardano J. F. Fractional punishment of fixed-ratio performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Sep;14(2):185–198. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Felton M., Lyon D. O. The post-reinforcement pause. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Mar;9(2):131–134. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Grossbard C. L., Mazur J. E. A comparison of delays and ratio requirements in self-control choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1986 May;45(3):305–315. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1986.45-305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. HAKE D. F., AZRIN N. H. An apparatus for delivering pain shock to monkevs. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:297–298. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. KAPLAN M. The maintenance of escape behavior under fixed-ratio reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1956 Apr;49(2):153–157. doi: 10.1037/h0048735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. LYON D. O. SOME NOTES ON CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION AND REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jul;7:289–291. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lattal K. A., Griffin M. A. Punishment contras during free-operant avoidance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Nov;18(3):509–516. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1972.18-509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Miller L. K. Escape from an effortful situation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):619–627. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Mintz D. E. Force of Response during Ratio Reinforcement. Science. 1962 Oct 26;138(3539):516–517. doi: 10.1126/science.138.3539.516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. NOTTERMAN J. M. Force emission during bar pressing. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:341–347. doi: 10.1037/h0042801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. PREMACK D., SCHAEFFER R. W., HUNDT A. REINFORCEMENT OF DRINKING BY RUNNING: EFFECT OF FIXED RATIO AND REINFORCEMENT TIME. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:91–96. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1964.7-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Perone M., Baron A. Reinforcement of human observing behavior by a stimulue correlated with extinction or increased effort. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Nov;34(3):239–261. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pliskoff S. S., Goldiamond I. Some discriminative properties of fixed ratio performance in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jan;9(1):1–9. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Powell R. W. The effect of small sequential changes in fixed-ratio size upon the post-reinforcement pause. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):589–593. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. RILLING M., MCDIARMID C. SIGNAL DETECTION IN FIXED-RATIO SCHEDULES. Science. 1965 Apr 23;148(3669):526–527. doi: 10.1126/science.148.3669.526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rachlin H. Recovery of responses during mild punishment. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 May;9(3):251–263. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1966.9-251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. SIDMAN M., STEBBINS W. C. Satiation effects under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954 Apr;47(2):114–116. doi: 10.1037/h0054127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. SKINNER B. F. Are theories of learning necessary? Psychol Rev. 1950 Jul;57(4):193–216. doi: 10.1037/h0054367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. THOMPSON D. M. PUNISHMENT BY SD ASSOCIATED WITH FIXED-RATIO REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 May;8:189–194. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. WINOGRAD E. ESCAPE BEHAVIOR UNDER DIFFERENT FIXED RATIOS AND SHOCK INTENSITIES. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Mar;8:117–124. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1965.8-117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

RESOURCES