Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on umbilical artery pH when utilized intraoperatively during scheduled cesarean delivery in individuals with class III obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2.
Study design
This was a randomized controlled study of individuals with class III obesity and singleton pregnancy who underwent scheduled cesarean delivery. Subjects were randomized to receive the institutional standard of care consisting of oxygen 2 liters per minute (L/min) via nasal cannula or CPAP containing oxygen supplementation of 2 L/min during cesarean delivery. The primary outcome was umbilical artery pH. Secondary outcomes included umbilical venous blood gas values, maternal venous blood gas values, neonatal and maternal outcomes, intraoperative parameters, and maternal satisfaction.
Results
Of 65 subjects, 33 were randomized to CPAP and 32 to oxygen 2 L/min via nasal cannula. A total of 12 participants in the CPAP group were unable to tolerate the device for the planned duration and subsequently received 2 L/min of oxygen via nasal cannula. Modified intention to treat analysis showed no difference in the mean umbilical arterial pH between the CPAP and routine management groups (7.18 vs. 7.19; p = 0.61). Similarly, there was no difference in the proportion of arterial pH < 7.1 between the CPAP and routine management groups (12.1% vs. 12.1%; p = 1.00). There was no difference in other secondary outcomes.
Conclusion
Compared to routine oxygen supplementation, CPAP was not associated with improved umbilical artery pH in individuals with class III obesity undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04993651
Keywords: acidosis, cesarean delivery, continuous positive airway pressure, fetal acidosis, obesity, pregnancy
1. INTRODUCTION
Maternal obesity, especially class III obesity (body mass index [BMI] 40 kg/m2), is associated with lower umbilical artery pH and an increased risk of fetal acidosis at the time of non‐emergent, prelabor cesarean delivery [1, 2]. As maternal BMI increases, umbilical artery pH decreases, and risk of fetal acidosis increases [1, 3]. Even a short period of fetal acidemia is associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes regardless of the type of acidosis (respiratory or metabolic) [3]. These findings are observed despite reassuring preoperative fetal monitoring, suggesting that intraoperative events play a role in the development of fetal acidemia.
There are multiple factors during cesarean delivery that have the potential to affect fetal‐maternal gas exchange. The surgical neuraxial blockade affects respiratory function, inducing sensory anesthesia up to T4 and resulting in paralysis of abdominal and intercostal muscles [4, 5]. While all individuals exhibit mild impairment of respiratory function after spinal anesthesia at the time of cesarean delivery, this effect is more pronounced in obese individuals [4]. Further, individuals with class III obesity are at high risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) as high as 24% [6]. A brief alteration of maternal respiratory status could result in impaired oxygenation and carbon dioxide retention that could disrupt fetal acid–base status.
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a form of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV), improves alveolar ventilation and maintains upper‐airway patency, thereby improving the exchange of carbon dioxide and oxygen. It additionally decreases the muscle load required for each breath and has been used in pregnant individuals [7, 8, 9, 10]. We hypothesized that neonates born to mothers with class III obesity wearing CPAP during the cesarean delivery would have a higher umbilical artery pH compared to routine airway management using nasal cannula (NC). We aimed to evaluate the effect of CPAP on fetal acid–base status in individuals with class III obesity at the time of scheduled cesarean delivery. We also examined the risk factors of neonatal acidosis in our cohort.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
This was a randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effect of two oxygen administration strategies—institutional standard of care with NC versus CPAP—on fetal umbilical arterial pH during scheduled, nonemergent cesarean delivery in individuals with class III obesity. Subjects were enrolled between October 2021 and April 2023. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained prior to study initiation, and the trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT04993651). Manuscript preparation followed the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines [11].
Clinical records were reviewed for all pregnant individuals with BMI greater than 40 kg/m2 receiving prenatal care or admitted for delivery at our institution. Those who met inclusion criteria of BMI 40 kg/m2 or greater at their last prenatal visit before scheduled delivery, age 18–45 years, singleton gestation, scheduled for cesarean delivery from 37 and 0 weeks gestation to 41 and 0 weeks gestation were approached for participation. Subjects were excluded if their pregnancy was complicated by fetal growth restriction, active pulmonary disease (pneumonia, moderate or severe asthma, pulmonary hypertension), suspected placenta accreta, active maternal infection (pyelonephritis, urinary tract infections, suspected intra‐amniotic infection), fetus with aneuploidy or major anomaly (neural tube defect, diaphragmatic hernia, congenital heart disease, gastroschisis, or omphalocele). In concordance with hospital policy, all participants were screened for SARS‐CoV‐2. Individuals were excluded if they tested positive for SARS‐CoV‐2 within the previous 10 days, displayed ongoing SARS‐CoV‐2 symptoms (cough, fever, shortness of breath) with a positive test more than 10 days prior, or had a recent hospitalization for SARS‐CoV‐2 infection.
2.1. Randomization and allocation
On hospital admission, external fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring was performed. Subjects remained eligible for participation if Category I FHR tracing was demonstrated [12]. After confirmation of a Category I FHR tracing, randomization was conducted using a computer‐generated randomization table in REDCap, with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Due to increasing risk of fetal acidosis with increasing BMI, randomization was stratified by maternal BMI less than 50 kg/m2 or greater than or equal to 50 kg/m2 [1, 3].
2.2. Intervention
Our exposure was an oxygen delivery device (CPAP or NC). For individuals who were assigned to CPAP, the face mask was applied with AUTO 5–20 cm H2O and oxygen flow of 2 L/min, titrated as needed to maintain SpO2 ≥ 95%. If the participant requested mask removal or experienced nausea, discomfort, or anxiety, the CPAP was discontinued, and an NC was used instead. For individuals who were assigned to NC. In accordance with institutional standard for obese patients undergoing cesarean delivery, NC was applied following the completion of neuraxial anesthesia, and oxygen flow of 2 L/min was increased if necessary to maintain SpO2 ≥ 95%. Following neonatal delivery and blood sample collection, the CPAP mask or NC was removed based on the patient and anesthesia provider's discretion.
2.3. Study procedure
At the time of enrollment, screening for obstructive sleep apnea was performed using a STOP‐Bang score [6, 13, 14]. A maternal venous blood gas sample was obtained to assess maternal pH, oxygen, and carbon dioxide levels on admission. Standard institutional protocol for neuraxial anesthesia was utilized:
In most cases, a spinal block was performed (1.5–1.6 mL of 0.75% bupivacaine in 8% dextrose, 0.15 mg preservative‐free morphine, and 15 µg fentanyl); alternatively, a combined spinal‐epidural was allowed at the anesthesiologist's discretion. Inability to achieve adequate neuraxial anesthesia, requiring conversion to general anesthesia, led to study withdrawal. Blood pressure management included a 500‐mL lactated Ringer's bolus administered preoperatively, followed by phenylephrine infusion (50 µg/min) titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure within 20% of baseline.
2.4. Outcomes
The primary outcome was umbilical artery pH. Secondary outcomes included umbilical venous blood gas values, maternal venous blood gas values, neonatal and maternal outcomes, intraoperative parameters, and maternal satisfaction. Trained research staff obtained and immediately analyzed umbilical artery and venous blood samples after 30 s of delayed cord clamping. As part of the study protocol, maternal venous blood gas sample was also obtained within 2 min of neonatal delivery to explore for any interval change in maternal venous blood gas parameters. Prior to hospital discharge, patients in the CPAP group completed a satisfaction survey regarding comfort and tolerability. The questionnaire was completed any time prior to hospital discharge at the participants’ convenience; a research team member followed up with subjects to solicit any questions and collect the completed survey. The questionnaire asked patients to rate the following discomforts associated with CPAP use and cesarean delivery on a 5‐point Likert scale: Nausea/vomiting, dry mouth or nose, facial discomfort, difficulty speaking or hearing, difficulty breathing, shortness of breath, and claustrophobia. Subjects were additionally asked if they would be willing to use a CPAP device again in the future. Additional variables (maternal vital signs, ICU admissions, need for postoperative respiratory support, neonatal APGAR scores, NICU admissions, neonatal respiratory support, intubation, and lengths of stay) were collected from the electronic medical record.
2.5. Statistics
A power analysis was based on previously published data, which suggested an average umbilical artery pH of 7.22 (standard deviation 0.07) in individuals with class III obesity undergoing non‐emergent cesarean delivery [1, 15]. Detecting a 0.05 difference in umbilical artery pH with 80% power at a two‐sided α of 0.05 required a total of 64 participants.
We analyzed the data per modified intention to treat, given that this represents the true clinical scenario in which some individuals may not tolerate CPAP. A secondary, per protocol analysis was performed after excluding individuals who did not tolerate CPAP for the entire duration.
Descriptive statistics were utilized to assess baseline demographics. We used Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and student t‐test or Mann–Whitney U test for numerical variables. Normality was examined using skewness and kurtosis tests. Secondary analysis was performed to identify risk factors for neonatal acidosis defined as umbilical artery cord pH < 7.1, we conducted a simple logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). All statistical tests were 2‐sided, and the statistical significance level was α = 0.05. All statistical analysis will be performed using Stata18 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).
3. RESULTS
A total of 1090 individuals were screened for eligibility (Figure 1). Of these, 85 met initial inclusion criteria and were enrolled. However, 19 were excluded at the time of hospital admission due to failing secondary screening criteria, leaving 66 participants. These 66 participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either CPAP (n = 33) or NC (n = 33). In the routine airway group, one participant was excluded from the final analysis due to the inability to establish neuraxial anesthesia. Enrollment concluded upon reaching the target sample size of 64 analyzed participants.
FIGURE 1.

Study flow diagram.
Baseline demographics were similar in both groups (Table 1). The mean BMI was 49.4 kg/m2 in the CPAP group and 49.4 kg/m2 in the NC group (p = 0.94). Mean gestational age at delivery was 39.4 weeks in the CPAP group and 38.4 weeks in the NC group (p = 0.04). There was no difference in the duration of time from completion of neuraxial anesthesia to the delivery of the neonate in the groups (CPAP median 32 min [IQR 28–37] minutes and NC median 32 min [IQR 30‐40].
TABLE 1.
Demographics.
| CPAP (n = 33) | Routine (n = 32) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 30.5 (± 5.1) | 30.7 (± 5.4) | 0.858 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 49.4 (± 7.3) | 49.4 (± 9.1) | 0.988 |
| Gestational age | 39.4 (± 2.5) | 38.4 (± 1.0) | 0.045 |
| Race | 0.738 | ||
| White | 7 (21.2) | 10 (31.2) | |
| Black | 24 (72.7) | 21 (65.6) | |
| Asian | 1 (3.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Hispanic | 1 (3.0) | 1 (3.1) | |
| Other | 1 (3.0) | 1 (3.1) | 1.00 |
| Parity | 2.0 (1.0–2.0) | 1.0 (1.0–2.0) | 0.495 |
| Chronic hypertension | 8 (24.2) | 17 (53.1) | 0.023 |
| Pre‐gestational diabetes | 2 (6.1) | 7 (21.9) | 0.082 |
| Obstructive sleep apnea | 0 (0.0) | 2 (6.2) | 0.238 |
| STOP‐Bang Score | 3.0 (3.0–4.0) | 4.0 (3.0–5.0) | 0.113 |
| Hypertensive disorder of pregnancy | 3 (9.1) | 9 (28.1) | 0.061 |
| Gestational diabetes | 5 (15.2) | 5 (15.6) | 1.00 |
Note: Numbers are shown as n (%), mean (± SD), or median (25th–75th percentile).
Table 2 summarizes the umbilical cord gas results. No significant difference in mean umbilical arterial pH was found between the CPAP and NC groups (7.18 vs. 7.19, respectively; p = 0.61). The proportion of neonates with an umbilical artery pH < 7.1 (12.1% vs. 12.9%; p = 1.00) or < 7.0 (6.1% vs. 6.5%; p = 1.00) did not differ between groups.
TABLE 2.
Umbilical cord gas results.
| CPAP (n = 33) | Nasal Cannula (n = 32) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Umbilical artery | |||
| pH | 7.18 (± 0.10) 7.18 (0.10) | 7.19 (± 0.11) | 0.613 |
| PO2 | 13.9 (± 4.6) | 14.0 (± 4.7) | 0.957 |
| PCO2 | 69.9 (± 14.9) | 66.0 (± 12.0) | 0.264 |
| HCO3 | 25.9 (± 1.6) | 25.6 (± 2.6) | 0.519 |
| Base deficit | 1.81 (± 2.55) | 2.14 (± 3.58) | 0.682 |
| pH < 7.1 | 4 (12.1) | 4 (12.5) | 1.00 |
| pH < 7.0 | 2 (6.1) | 2 (6.2) | 1.00 |
| Umbilical vein | |||
| pH | 7.26 (± 0.09) | 7.26 (± 0.09) | 0.845 |
| PO2 | 20.8 (± 5.9) | 22.5 (± 7.4) | 0.307 |
| PCO2 | 55.9 (± 14.6) | 52.6 (± 12.8) | 0.34 |
| HCO3 | 24.0 (± 1.6) | 23.7 (± 2.0) | 0.55 |
| Base deficit | 2.36 (± 3.30) | 2.63 (± 3.61) | 0.757 |
Neonatal APGAR scores at 1 min (median 8 [IQR 8–8] vs. 8 [IQR 7–8], p = 0.13) and at 5 min (9 vs. 9, p = 0.88) were comparable. The need for neonatal respiratory support (27.3% vs. 37.5%; p = 0.43) and NICU admission rates for ongoing respiratory support (9.1% vs. 19.4%; p = 0.30) were also similar between CPAP and NC groups (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Neonatal outcomes.
| CPAP (n = 33) | Nasal Cannula (n = 32) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neonatal Outcomes | |||
| Apgar 1 min | 8.0 (8.0–8.0) | 8.0 (7.0–8.0) | 0.128 |
| Apgar 5 min | 9.0 (8.0–9.0) | 9.0 (8.0–9.0) | 0.865 |
| Need for respiratory support (Nasal Cannula, NIV, endotracheal tube) | 9 (27.3) | 12 (37.5) | 0.43 |
| Intubation | 0 (0.0) | 1 (3.1) | 0.492 |
| NICU admission | 3 (9.1) | 6 (18.8) | 0.30 |
| Duration of Hospitalization | 2.0 (2.0–3.0) | 2.0 (2.0–3.0) | 0.387 |
Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; NIV, noninvasive ventilation.
Twelve participants in the CPAP group could not tolerate the device for the planned duration (mean duration of use = 2 min), and subsequently received 2 L/min of oxygen via NC. A secondary, per‐protocol analysis excluded these 12 individuals. Among those who completed the study according to randomization and tolerated CPAP until delivery, there were no significant differences in umbilical arterial pH (7.18 vs. 7.19, p = 0.78), nor in the rates of umbilical artery pH < 7.1 (14.3% vs. 11.6%; p = 1.00) or < 7.0 (4.8% vs. 7.0%; p = 1.00) (Table 4).
TABLE 4.
Umbilical cord gas results, per protocol.
| CPAP (n = 21) | Routine (n = 44) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Umbilical artery | |||
| pH | 7.18 (± 0.09) | 7.19 (± 0.11) | 0.783 |
| PO2 | 14.4 (± 5.3) | 13.7 (± 4.2) | 0.593 |
| PCO2 | 70.7 (± 13.2) | 66.7 (± 13.8) | 0.282 |
| HCO3 | 26.0 (± 1.4) | 25.6 (± 2.4) | 0.436 |
| Base deficit | 1.71 (± 2.80) | 2.10 (± 3.22) | 0.644 |
| pH < 7.1 | 3 (14.3) | 5 (11.4) | 0.706 |
| pH < 7.0 | 1 (4.8) | 3 (6.8) | 1.000 |
| Umbilical vein | |||
| pH | 7.26 (± 0.1) | 7.26 (± 0.1) | 0.879 |
| PO2 | 20.0 (± 5.3) | 22.4 (± 7.2) | 0.190 |
| PCO2 | 56.1 (± 10.1) | 53.4 (± 15.2) | 0.451 |
| HCO3 | 24.3 (± 1.5) | 23.6 (± 2.0) | 0.157 |
| Base deficit | 1.86 (± 2.99) | 2.81 (± 3.61) | 0.301 |
Maternal venous blood gases at delivery were available for 51 of the 64 participants; reasons for missing samples primarily related to difficulty obtaining blood within 2 min of delivery (Supplemental Table 1). Baseline maternal venous blood gas values were similar across groups. No significant differences were observed in maternal venous pH, pO2, pCO2, or HCO3 at delivery. There were no adverse maternal outcomes to include ICU admission and respiratory complications.
Table 5 presents the risk factor analysis for neonatal acidosis (umbilical artery pH < 7.1). Simple logistic regression identified a significant association between later gestational age at delivery and lower likelihood of acidosis (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.17–0.90). A greater decrease in mean arterial pressure relative to baseline following neuraxial anesthesia was associated with higher odds of neonatal acidosis (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00–1.07). Additionally, participants with a STOP‐BANG score ≥ 5 had an increased risk of neonatal acidosis (OR 9.21, 95% CI 1.67–50.96).
TABLE 5.
Odds of umbilical artery pH < 7.1.
| Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) | |
|---|---|
| Body mass index | 0.98 (0.89–1.08) |
| Gestational age | 0.40 (0.17–0.90) |
| Duration of time from anesthesia procedure start to delivery | 0.92 (0.83–1.02) |
| Time from neuraxial anesthesia completion to delivery | 0.94 (0.84–1.06) |
| Preoperative MAP | 0.96 (0.90–1.03) |
| Preoperative SpO2 | 1.18 (0.69–2.02) |
| SpO2 intraoperative nadir | 0.86 (0.74–1.01) |
| Preoperative maternal venous pH | 670.97 (0.00 to 2.0e+11) |
| Preoperative maternal venous PCO2 | 0.97 (0.85–1.11) |
| Preoperative maternal venous PO2 | 1.02 (0.98–1.06) |
| Delta MAP average (Preoperative MAP − average intraoperative MAP) | 1.03 (0.98–1.08) |
| Delta MAP maximum (Preoperative MAP − lowest intraoperative MAP) | 1.03 (1.00–1.07) |
| Chronic hypertension | 1.71 (0.39–7.58) |
| Pregestational diabetes | 0.88 (0.09–8.09) |
| STOP‐BANG score of 5 or greater | 9.21 (1.67–50.96) |
Abbreviation: MAP, mean arterial pressure.
Survey data were available for 29 of the 33 individuals assigned to CPAP. Of these 29 subjects, 22 reported they would be willing to use CPAP during a future procedure or if recommended for treatment of OSA. The most commonly reported negative symptom was mask‐related claustrophobia, although most participants indicated minimal adverse effects overall (Figure 2). Finally, the information about the missing information is presented in Table S2. Overall, the proportion of missing information was low.
FIGURE 2.

Satisfaction survey results for individuals receiving CPAP.
3.1. Comment
3.1.1. Principal findings
In this randomized controlled trial of individuals with class III obesity undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery, there was no difference in umbilical artery pH between those who received CPAP and those who received 2 L/min oxygen via NC. However, only two‐thirds of participants assigned to CPAP were able to tolerate it from the completion of neuraxial anesthesia until neonatal delivery. The study was not powered for a per‐protocol analysis, therefore, the results are inconclusive when restricting analysis to those subjects who were able to tolerate the device for the prescribed duration.
CPAP is known to improve alveolar ventilation and upper‐airway patency by providing positive end‐expiratory pressure [7]. However, in this study, maternal venous blood gas values at delivery were comparable in both the CPAP and NC groups. While not powered specifically to detect rare adverse events, there were no reported maternal pulmonary complications or aspiration episodes. We demonstrate that CPAP can be administered to conscious, pregnant individuals undergoing cesarean delivery with appropriate patient selection and monitoring.
3.2. Results in the context of what is known
Prior literature indicates that supplemental oxygen at the time of cesarean delivery reduces maternal desaturation risk but does not necessarily improve neonatal acid–base status [16]. Previous studies in nonobese populations similarly demonstrated that supplemental oxygen did not significantly affect umbilical artery pH or APGAR scores [17, 18, 19]. Although all obstetric patients experience a degree of respiratory function impairment post‐spinal anesthesia, the effect is more pronounced in those with higher BMI [4, 5]. Despite CPAP's known benefits of improving ventilation and offloading the work of breathing [7], our findings did not show improved neonatal acid–base status in the obese population. This trial represents the first to evaluate intraoperative CPAP specifically in class III obesity during cesarean delivery, although several published case reports have described its intraoperative use during cesarean delivery in patients with super‐morbid obesity, asthma, and obstructive sleep apnea [10, 20, 21, 22, 23].
Neuraxial anesthesia management also impacts fetal acid–base balance. For example, prolonged intervals between neuraxial anesthesia placement and delivery have been associated with lower umbilical artery pH at scheduled cesarean delivery [24]. In this study, CPAP did not prolong the operative interval. Nonetheless, individuals with obesity often have greater hemodynamic variability and require higher vasopressor doses to prevent hypotension after neuraxial anesthesia [25, 26, 27]. A larger drop in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline was associated with a higher risk of neonatal acidosis, emphasizing the importance of meticulous blood pressure control [28, 29].
OSA prevalence in pregnant individuals with class III obesity can be as high as 24% [6], yet only two participants in this trial had a documented OSA diagnosis. A STOP‐Bang score ≥ 5 is suggestive of a moderate OSA risk. This was associated with increased odds of neonatal acidosis, indicating the possible contribution of unrecognized or undertreated OSA to adverse neonatal outcomes in this high‐risk population [13].
3.3. Clinical implications
While one‐third of subjects randomized to CPAP did not tolerate the application of the device, limiting the potential clinical applicability for many patients, two‐thirds, or the majority, of subjects did tolerate the device. This demonstrates the practicality use of CPAP for awake pregnant individuals with airway‐protective reflexes. No adverse respiratory events occurred, supporting that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation can be integrated into obstetric anesthesia protocols for appropriately selected patients.
3.4. Research implications
Further research is needed to investigate the effects of oxygen supplementation at the time of cesarean delivery in the obese population. Specific high‐risk groups at increased risk of neonatal acidosis, such as those with fetal growth restriction, should be included as they may be the most susceptible to the effects. With low rates of OSA and familiarity with the CPAP device among our patient population, it's possible that improved compliance and effect may be seen in patients already using CPAP for OSA. Additionally, further research is needed to evaluate the respiratory effects of neuraxial anesthesia on the obese pregnant patient to best understand how to support these individuals.
3.5. Strengths and limitations
Our study has many strengths. The randomized control design makes two comparison groups similar except for the intervention. Additionally, our patient population with an average BMI of 49 kg/m2, represents a high‐risk population with class III obesity. The average arterial pH of our control population is similar to that reported in the literature, indicating that our study is adequately powered to detect a significant difference in the primary outcome. We additionally were able to evaluate risk factors for neonatal acidosis in this population of pregnant subjects with morbid obesity undergoing scheduled cesarean delivery.
The most significant limitation of this study is the poor compliance with only two‐thirds of those subjects randomized to CPAP able to tolerate it for the prescribed duration. Rates of CPAP adherence are similarly poor when prescribed for the treatment of OSA [30]. Assessment of arterial blood gas values would have provided a more accurate assessment of maternal oxygenation and ventilation. However, the venous blood sample is more easily obtained and there is acceptable agreement between arterial and venous pH, pCO2, and bicarbonate values [31]. Lastly, due to the nature of the intervention, this study was unblinded.
4. CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, the use of CPAP during cesarean delivery in patients with class III obesity did not improve umbilical artery pH when compared to routine NC management. We demonstrate the practical use of CPAP intraoperatively for respiratory support in an obese population undergoing cesarean delivery. Future studies focusing on subgroups at heightened risk of neonatal acidosis and exploring respiratory dynamics in morbidly obese parturients under neuraxial anesthesia may further refine the role of CPAP in improving perinatal outcomes.
DISCLOSURE
T.D. is a military service member or federal/contracted employee of the United States government. This work was prepared as part of my official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that `copyright protection under this title is not available for any work of the United States Government.' Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a U.S. Government work as work prepared by a military service member or employee of the U.S. Government as part of that person's official duties. The views expressed in this article reflect the results of research conducted by the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the United States Government.
The study protocol was approved by the Eastern Virginia Medical School Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects.
Supporting information
Supporting Information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This study is supported by EVMS‐Sentara Clinical Research Reserve Seed Fund. The authors would like to acknowledge Jennifer Costello, Mable Wallace, Lynette Marcais, Paula Darling, and William Carson for their contribution to this research project.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
REFERENCES
- 1. Edwards, R. K. , Cantu J., Cliver S., Biggio J. R. Jr, Owen J., and Tita A. T. N.. 2013. “The Association of Maternal Obesity with Fetal pH and Base Deficit at Cesarean Delivery.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 122(2 Pt 1): 262–7. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829b1e62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. DeBolt, C. A. , Sarker M., Trejo F. E., Feldman K., Kaplowitz E., Rattner P., Paul K., et al. 2022. “Association between Obesity and Fetal Acidosis at Scheduled Cesarean Delivery.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 140(6): 950–7. 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bligard, K. H. , Cameo T., McCallum K. N., Rubin A., Rimsza R. R., Cahill A. G., Palanisamy A., Odibo A. O., and Raghuraman N.. 2022. “The Association of Fetal Acidemia with Adverse Neonatal Outcomes at Time of Scheduled Cesarean Delivery.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 227(2): 265. e1‐e8. 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. von Ungern‐Sternberg, B. S. , Regli A., Bucher E., Reber A., and Schneider M. C.. 2004. “Impact of Spinal Anaesthesia and Obesity on Maternal Respiratory Function during Elective Caesarean Section.” Anaesthesia 59(8): 743–9. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03832.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kelly, M. C. , Fitzpatrick K. T., and Hill D. A.. 1996. “Respiratory Effects of Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Section.” Anaesthesia 51(12): 1120–2. 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb15046.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Doming uez, J. E. , Krystal A. D., and Habib A. S.. 2018. “Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnant Women: A Review of Pregnancy Outcomes and an Approach to Management.” Anesthesia and Analgesia 127(5): 1167–77. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. MacIntyre, N. R. 2019. “Physiologic Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation.” Respiratory Care 64(6): 617–28. 10.4187/respcare.06635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Corcione, N. , Karim H., Mina B., Pisano A., Dikmen Y., Kondili E., Nicolini A., et al. 2019. “Non‐Invasive Ventilation during Surgery Under Neuraxial Anaesthesia: A Pathophysiological Perspective on Application and Benefits and a Systematic Literature Review.” Anaesthesiology Intensive Therapy 51(4): 289–98. 10.5114/ait.2019.88572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Erdogan, G. , Okyay D. Z., Yurtlu S., Hanci V., Ayoglu H., Koksal B., and Turan I. O.. 2010. “Non‐Invasive Mechanical Ventilation with Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery.” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 19(4): 438–40. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2010.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Polin, C. M. , Hale B., Mauritz A. A., Habib A. S., Jones C. A., Strouch Z. Y., and Dominguez J. E.. 2015. “Anesthetic Management of Super‐Morbidly Obese Parturients for Cesarean Delivery with a Double Neuraxial Catheter Technique: A Case Series.” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 24(3): 276–80. 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Skiöld, B. , Petersson G., Ahlberg M., Stephansson O., and Johansson S.. 2017. “Population‐Based Reference Curve for Umbilical Cord Arterial pH in Infants Born at 28 to 42 Weeks.” Journal of Perinatology 37(3): 254–9. 10.1038/jp.2016.207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106 . 2009. “Intrapartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring: Nomenclature, Interpretation, and General Management Principles.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 114(1): 192–202. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chung, F. , Yang Y., and Liao P.. 2013. “Predictive Performance of the STOP‐Bang Score for Identifying Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Obese Patients.” Obesity Surgery 23(12): 2050–7. 10.1007/s11695-013-1006-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Pearson, F. , Batterham A. M., and Cope S.. 2019. “The STOP‐Bang Questionnaire as a Screening Tool for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnancy.” Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 15(5): 705–10. 10.5664/jcsm.7754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Schulz, K. F. , Altman D. G., Moher D., and CONSORT Group . 2010. “CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials.” Obstetrics and Gynecology 115(5): 1063–70. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d9d421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Siriussawakul, A. , Triyasunant N., Nimmannit A., Ngerncham S., Hirunkanokpan P., Luang‐Aram S., Pechpaisit N., Wangdee A., and Ruangvutilert P.. 2014. “Effects of Supplemental Oxygen on Maternal and Neonatal Oxygenation in Elective Cesarean Section under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” BioMed Research International 2014: 627028. 10.1155/2014/627028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Simon, V. B. , Fong A., and Nageotte M. P.. 2018. “Supplemental Oxygen Study: A Randomized Controlled Study on the Effect of Maternal Oxygen Supplementation during Planned Cesarean Delivery on Umbilical Cord Gases.” American Journal of Perinatology 35(1): 84–89. 10.1055/s-0037-1606184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Khaw, K. S. , Ngan Kee W. D., Lee A., Wang C. C., Wong A. S., Ng F., and Rogers M. S.. 2004. “Supplementary Oxygen for Elective Caesarean Section under Spinal Anaesthesia: Useful in Prolonged Uterine Incision‐to‐Delivery Interval?.” British Journal of Anaesthesia 92(4): 518–22. 10.1093/bja/aeh092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Chatmongkolchart, S. , and Prathep S.. 2016. “Supplemental Oxygen for Caesarean Section during Regional Anaesthesia.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3(3): CD006161. 10.1002/14651858.CD006161.pub3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Fujita, N. , Tachibana K., Takeuchi M., and Kinouchi K.. 2014. “Successful Perioperative Use of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation in a Pregnant Woman with Acute Pulmonary Edema.” Masui. Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 63(5): 557–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kähler, C. M. , Högl B., Habeler R., Brezinka C., Hamacher J., Dienstl A., and Prior C.. 2002. “Management of Respiratory Deterioration in a Pregnant Patient with Severe Kyphoscoliosis by Non‐Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation.” Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 114(19–20): 874–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Guterres, A. P. , and Newman M. J.. 2010. “Total Spinal Following Labour Epidural Analgesia Managed with Non‐Invasive Ventilation.” Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 38(2): 373–5. 10.1177/0310057X1003800222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Yuan, N. , El‐Sayed Y. Y., Ruoss S. J., Riley E., Enns G. M., and Robinson T. E.. 2009. “Successful Pregnancy and Cesarean Delivery via Noninvasive Ventilation in Mitochondrial Myopathy.” Journal of Perinatology 29(2): 166–7. 10.1038/jp.2008.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Rimsza, R. R. , Perez W. M., Babbar S., O'Brien M., and Vricella L. K.. 2019. “Time from Neuraxial Anesthesia Placement to Delivery is Inversely Proportional to Umbilical Arterial Cord pH at Scheduled Cesarean Delivery.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 220(4): 389. e1‐e9. 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Vricella, L. K. , Louis J. M., Mercer B. M., and Bolden N.. 2010. “Anesthesia Complications during Scheduled Cesarean Delivery for Morbidly Obese Women.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 203(3): 276.e1–5. 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Yang, C. , Meng Q., Cheng Y., Huang S., and Yu X.. 2022. “Effect of Maternal Body Mass Index on the Prophylactic Dose of Phenylephrine for Preventing Hypotension in Parturients after Spinal Anaesthesia.” Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine 41(2): 101035. 10.1016/j.accpm.2022.101035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Nivatpumin, P. , Lertbunnaphong T., Maneewan S., and Vittayaprechapon N.. 2023. “Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Anesthetic‐Related Complications of Morbidly Obese and Super‐Obese Parturients Delivering by Cesarean Section.” Annals of Medicine 55(1): 1037–46. 10.1080/07853890.2023.2187877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Lee, A. , and Ngan Kee W.. 2019. “Effects of Vasoactive Medications and Maternal Positioning during Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Hemodynamics and Neonatal Acid‐Base Status.” Clinics in Perinatology 46(4): 765–83. 10.1016/j.clp.2019.08.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Knigin, D. , Avidan A., and Weiniger C. F.. 2020. “The Effect of Spinal Hypotension and Anesthesia‐to‐Delivery Time Interval on Neonatal Outcomes in Planned Cesarean Delivery.” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 223(5): 747.e1–13. 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Mehrtash, M. , Bakker J. P., and Ayas N.. 2019. “Predictors of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Adherence in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.” Lung 197(2): 115–21. 10.1007/s00408-018-00193-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Malatesha, G. , Singh N. K., Bharija A., Rehani B., and Goel A.. 2007. “Comparison of Arterial and Venous pH, Bicarbonate, PCO2 and PO2 in Initial Emergency Department Assessment.” Emergency Medicine Journal 24(8):569–71. 10.1136/emj.2007.04 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting Information
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
