Abstract
The stem, a crucial organ that connects the root and aboveground parts, is responsible for transporting water and nutrients. This review synthesizes the current understanding of stem development in ornamental plants. We first outline the morphological and physiological characteristics of stem elongation and stem thickening. Subsequently, we examine the roles of key genes, plant hormones, and cell wall components in regulating stem growth, mechanical strength, and overall plant architecture. We also analyze how environmental factors (e.g. temperature, light, water, and nutrients) and hormonal and genetic networks modulate stem development. Particular emphasis is placed on the functions of auxin, gibberellins, and brassinosteroids. Recent studies in ornamental plants such as Prunus, Chrysanthemum, and Paeonia have illuminated the advances in cultivation techniques and gene identification associated with cellular processes, cell wall synthesis, hormone biosynthesis, and signal transduction. Looking forward, we highlight emerging research directions, including the use of advanced imaging and artificial intelligence for phenotypic analysis, and the integration of multi-omics data within a ‘Breeding 5.0’ framework. Ultimately, this review aims to support the targeted breeding of ornamental plants with optimized stem traits, enhancing both aesthetic value and production efficiency.
Introduction
Shoot architecture critically determines the morphology of the aboveground of ornamental plants, supporting their growth and ornamental value [1]. As an important aspect of shoot architecture, stem development plays a key role in transporting nutrients, water, and inorganic salts, and providing mechanical strength for plant growth. It involves two dimensions, longitudinal elongation and lateral thickening [2]. Stem elongation controls plant height, resulting in leaves capturing sunlight and the spread of pollen or seeds. An appropriate plant height is crucial for biomass accumulation, reproductive activities, and adaptability to different environments [3]. Cultivars with shorter stems generally exhibit higher yields and are economically beneficial for commercial value [4]. Stem thickness is closely related to the component alternation and anatomical characteristics. It gives rise to stem elasticity and rigidity, which determine the mechanical strength. In production, stem thickness is used as an important indicator for evaluating a plant’s ability to resist lodging. Therefore, stem development is fundamentally important for plant growth and productivity [5, 6]. Recently, research on the stem development of ornamental plants has gradually increased, involving temperature regulation, hormone signaling, and molecular mechanism elucidation, which provides an important theoretical basis and technical support for cultivation. In this review, we focus on the genetic regulatory mechanisms of stem development in ornamental plants, aiming to explore how new genes and mechanisms process stem architecture, as well as to propose current research hotspots and future directions.
Biological basis of stem development
The stem is an important nutritional organ of the aboveground parts of plants. It can transport nutrients and water between roots and leaves, and function in supporting organs such as leaves, flowers, and fruits [7, 8]. The location where leaves are attached to the stem is called a node, and the part between two nodes is called an internode [9, 10]. Stem development encompasses two parts: stem elongation and stem thickening. Appropriate plant height and mechanical strength of the stem are crucial to upright plant growth, enhance plant resistance to lodging, increase plant biomass, and ultimately increase production [11–13]. This stem development is functionally integrated with root architecture. Healthy roots supply water, nitrogen, and nutrients necessary for sustained shoot growth [14, 15]. The plasticity of root traits is closely linked to the stability of shoot characteristics [16]. In turn, shoot architecture also influences root resource acquisition through carbon allocation priorities, and stem elongation often correlates with deeper root penetration to enhance lodging resistance [17]. In ornamental plant production, modification of stem development can cultivate dwarf potted varieties to increase their ornamental value [18, 19]. Therefore, the regulation of stem development has attracted increased attention and has been extensively studied.
Morphological and physiological characteristics of stem elongation
Stem elongation involves cell division (increasing the number of cells) and cell elongation (changing the cell size). The early stem elongation process is determined by the activity of the plant shoot apical meristem (SAM; shoot tip) [20, 21]. The SAM consists of the central zone (CZ), the organizing center (OC), and the rib zone (RZ) located below the CZ [22]. Among them, stem cell activity and cell division in the RZ region play important roles in stem elongation [23]. In the Arabidopsis SAM, the downregulated expression of cell cycle genes inhibits the division of stem elongation-related cells in the RZ [24] (Fig. 1A). The shape and size of the SAM also affect stem development. A larger SAM volume leads to early flowering and hinders stem elongation [25] (Fig. 1A). FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and TERMINAL FLOWER 1 (TFL1) are two key genes involved in the SAM transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth in plants. A high expression ratio of FT/TFL1 promotes more vegetative meristems into inflorescence meristems, causing dwarf plant architecture [26].
Figure 1.

Genetic regulation of stem elongation. Stem elongation is determined by (A) early cellular activities in the shoot apical meristem (SAM) and (B) subsequent internode cell expansion. (A) SAM consists of central zone (CZ), organizing center (OC), and rib zone (RZ). Cellular activity in the RZ contributes to stem elongation, where cell division driven by cell cycle genes promotes elongation. An enlarged SAM accelerates the transition from vegetative to reproductive growth, which negatively impacts stem elongation. (B) Internode elongation depends on cell wall loosening. Transcription factors such as bHLH and MYB regulate the expression of EXPANSIN, XYLOGLUCAN ENDOTRANSGLUCOSYLASE (XET), and PECTIN METHYLESTERASE (PME), thereby modulating the degree of cell wall loosening and subsequently influencing cell and stem elongation. Note: EP, epidermis; C, cortex; VT, vascular tissue; P, pith. Arrows indicate positive regulation or promotion, while lines ending with vertical bars represent repression.
During vegetative growth, plant height is determined by internode length (precisely cell length) and node number [27–29]. Histological observations of the internodes of dwarf mutants such as semidwarf-1 (sd1) and brassinosteroid insensitive 1 (bri1) show that the cell length is significantly reduced [30, 31]. The premise of internode cell elongation is loosening of the cell wall. The normal assembly of the cell wall can be influenced by the synthesis of cellulose, lignin, and other components (Fig. 1B). For example, mutations in genes encoding lignin synthases cinnamoyl-CoA reductase and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase result in a severe dwarf phenotype [32, 33]. The expression of the transcription factor MYB61 and cellulose synthase (CesAs) promotes cellulose biosynthesis, enhancing internode cell elongation [34, 35]. Additionally, cell elongation can be boosted by activating the expression of genes encoding xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (XET) and expansin (EXP) proteins, which cleaves xyloglucan polymers and destroy polysaccharide adhesion, thereby enhancing the loosening of the cell wall [36–38] (Fig. 1B). Multiple basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factors, including ILI1 BINDING bHLH PROTEIN1, PACLOBUTRAZOL-RESISTANT1, and HOMOLOG OF BEE2 INTERACTING WITH IBH1, are jointly involved in the transcription of cell wall loosening–related genes, contributing to the elongation and growth of internode cells [39–41].
In some monocots, the primary meristem left over from the SAM is retained at the base of the internodes, namely, the intercalary meristem (IM). During the reproductive growth period, plants can undergo intercalary growth through the activity of the IM, causing dramatic stem elongation [42, 43]. Cell division, cell elongation, cell wall composition, and cytoskeleton activities in the IM collectively affect node number and internode length. In maize, both the TERMINAL EAR 1 and BELL1-like homeobox 12/14 genes are highly expressed in the IM. Their loss-of-function mutants present a dwarf phenotype with disordered IM development [44, 45]. Although multiple genes that regulate the homeostasis maintenance of the IM have been identified, the formation of the IM in ornamental plants and the detailed underlying mechanisms are still unclear.
Morphological and physiological characteristics of stem thickness
Stem thickness is primarily determined by secondary growth, a developmental process driven by the activity of vascular and cork cambium (Fig. 2). This process produces secondary vascular tissues (secondary xylem and secondary phloem) and the periderm through vascular cambium and cork cambium activity [46, 47]. Through cell division, differentiation, and secondary cell wall deposition, this process increases stem diameter and confers significant mechanical strength (Fig. 2A). Stem strength is the key agronomic trait for plants to resist pests and lodging and is influenced by the number and arrangement of vascular bundles, secondary cell wall thickness, and lignin content [13, 48].
Figure 2.

Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying stem thickness. (A) Cross-section of stem showing secondary growth driven by vascular cambium activity. Cell division in the vascular cambium produces secondary xylem and secondary phloem, leading to increased stem thickness. (B) Structural components of plant cell wall contribute to mechanical strength and thickness. CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CesA) and XYLOGLUCAN ENDOTRANSGLUCOSYLASE/HYDROLASE (XTH) promote cellulose synthesis; Ca2+ binds to pectin and supports cell wall integrity; silicon and 3-O-METHYLTRANSFERASE (CCoAOMT) positively regulate lignin deposition into the cell wall. Together, these components enhance the structural integrity and mechanical strength of the stem.
The synthesis of secondary cell walls is crucial to mechanical strength (Fig. 2B). Moreover, the cell wall provides the elasticity required for cell expansion by stretching itself, absorbs new polysaccharide polymers to maintain its thickness and toughness, and provides rigid support for plant tissues and organs [49,50]. The cell wall consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, protein, and mineral elements such as calcium and silicon. Cellulose is the main component of the cell wall from the cellulose synthase complex on the plasma membrane [51]. The CesA family plays an important role in the synthesis of both primary and secondary cell walls [52] (Fig. 2B). Hemicellulose or pectin side chains in cellulose microfibrils can change the properties of cellulose and reduce its mechanical strength, ultimately causing the bending of plant stems. In a study on six kinds of cut flowers, including lotus, water lily, rose, gerbera, lisianthus, and carnation, the existence of hemicellulose or pectin side chains in curved stems, not upright stems, disrupted the crystallinity, purity, and length of cellulose, resulting in the acceleration of cell wall degradation and decreased mechanical strength [53, 54].
In the comparative analysis of large and small lotus stems, the differentially expressed xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase genes (XTH) are identified as an important gene family involved in cell wall remodeling in lotus architecture formation (Fig. 2B). The overexpression of XTHs blocks the gravity response during the development of the secondary cell wall, decreasing the stem’s mechanical strength [55, 56]. Lignin can enhance the rigidity and compressive strength of cell walls by filling the interstitial spaces between cellulose microfibrils. Many studies have focused on how to regulate the mechanical strength of ornamental plant stems by altering the lignin content. In herbaceous peony, there is a significant positive correlation between mechanical strength and lignin content [57, 58]. In addition, the lignin synthase 3-O-methyltransferase (CCoAOMT) gene is highly expressed in xylem tissues in Forsythia. The overexpression of FsCCoAOMT enhances the stem mechanical strength [59] (Fig. 2B).
Calcium is an indispensable component of the cell wall, where Ca2+ can bind with the free carboxyl groups in pectin to form stable complexes, thereby improving the rigidity and stability of cell walls [60] (Fig. 2B). Ca2+ reduces the ethylene level produced by gravity and significantly inhibits bending in Antirrhinum majus [61]. In gerbera and herbaceous peony, exogenous Ca2+ treatments improve stem quality by increasing stem strength and reducing bending [62–64]. Silicon is present in the tissues of nearly all terrestrial plants and is primarily deposited as amorphous silica in specific cell walls [65] (Fig. 2B). It plays a key role in the assembly and remodeling of cell walls [66]. In herbaceous peony, silicon application enhances stem strength by promoting lignin accumulation [67].
Furthermore, a reasonable stem structure enhances plant adaptability to abiotic stresses. Specifically, stem secondary development enhances drought tolerance by modulating vessel density and lignin deposition to optimize water transport efficiency [68]. Specialized stem porous structure enhances wind resistance by effectively dissipating the load [69, 70]. Additionally, the specific xylem secondary growth patterns regulate ion transport, which helps maintain ionic homeostasis and improves salt tolerance [71]. Overall, stem secondary development not only underlies morphological maturation but also provides an integrated structural foundation for adaptation to biotic and abiotic challenges (Fig. 2).
Effects of hormones on the development of ornamental plant stems
Plant hormones are crucial regulators of stem development in ornamental plants. Among them, auxin, gibberellins (GAs), and brassinosteroids (BRs) are three important plant growth–promoting hormones that significantly control plant height by regulating stem cell division, cell elongation, and tissue differentiation. In horticultural production, chemical plant growth regulators (PGRs) are commonly employed to control plant height, as detailed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Hormone treatments regulate the stem development in ornamental plants.
| Treatment | Concentration | Species | Effect a | Mechanism | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, and 0.1 mg·l−1 BL | Matthiola incana | Positive | 0.06 and 0.08 mg·l−1 BL promoted plant height, stem diameter, fresh weight, and chlorophyll content. | [72] | |
| Brassinolide (BL) | 0.05 mmol·l−12,4-epibrassinolide (EBR) | Lilium hybrid | Positive | BL spraying promotes plant height and dry weight | [73] |
| 0.67 mM (6-BA) 6-benzyladenine | Paulownia ssp. | Positive | 6-BA stimulated stem elongation and induced a transient stem thickening 1 week after application. | [74] | |
| 0.002 mg·l−1 Thidiazuron (TDZ) | Rhododendron aureum | Positive | The combination of 0.002 mg·l−1 TDZ + 0.5 mg·l−1 IBA was optimal for stem elongation in vitro. | [75] | |
| Cytokinin | 10, 20, 40, 80, and 100 μM TDZ | Rosa hybrida | Dual-effect | 100 μM TDZ reduced new shoot length to half that of the control while increasing stem diameter by ~40%. | [76] |
| 150 mg·l−1 GA3 | Anemone spp. | Positive | GA3 significantly affected stem height, number of leaves, and flower behavior. | [77] | |
| 50, 100, and 150 mg·l−1 GA3 | Cyclamen africanum | Positive | 150 mg·l−1 GA3 significantly increased plant height and petiole length. | [78] | |
| 100 and 200 mg·l−1 GA3 | Phalaenopsis spp. | Dual effect | GA3 increased stem length and decreased stem diameter. | [79] | |
| 10, 25, and 50 ml Promalin (50 mg·l−1 each GA4 + 7 and BA) | Lilium longiflorum | Positive | Root-absorbed GA4+7 (25 and 50 ml) promoted stem elongation, with spray volumes >10 ml per plant increasing over-elongation risk. | [80] | |
| Gibberellin | GA4 + 7, GA3, PBZ (1, 10 and 100·l−1) | Cyclamen persicum | Positive | GAs could always increase plant height under different photoperiods and temperatures. | [81] |
| 0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2 mg·l−1 Paclobutrazol (PBZ) | Iris nigricans | Negative | PBZ at 0.5 or 1 mg·L−1 caused severe dwarfism, characterized by drastic reductions in stalk height and weight. | [82] | |
| 400 mg·l-1 PBZ | Agapanthus praecox | Negative | 400 mg·l−1 PBZ shorten the scape length over 70%. | [83] | |
| 100, 300, and 500 mg·l-1 PBZ | Lilium longiflorum | Negative | Plants are more severely suppressed and become shorter as PBZ concentration increases. | [84] | |
| 30 mg·l−1 PBZ | Cyclamen sp. | Negative | PBZ produced a smaller plant height and peduncle length. | [85] | |
| Gibberellin inhibitor | 50, 150, and 300 mg·l−1 Uniconazole (UCZ) | Curcuma alismatifolia | Dual-effect | UCZ-treated plants exhibited obviously decreased plant height and scape length, while stem diameter increased slightly. | [86] |
| Melatonin | 0.5 mM Melatonin once a week | Paeonia lactiflora | Positive | Melatonin treatment enhanced stem strength, lignin content, and secondary cell wall thickness. | [87] |
| Methyl jasmonate | 200 mg·l−1 MeJA | Salix purpurea | Positive | MeJA significantly increased plant height, shrub diameter, and branch diameter. | [88] |
| Flurprimidol | 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, 0.16, and 0.24 mg per pot | Lilium longiflorum | Negative | Flurprimidol drenches suppressed lily height by up to 59% in a dose-dependent manner, with no effect on flowering. | [89] |
Effect categories: positive = promotes the stem developmental process(es) (elongation and/or thickening); negative = suppresses the stem developmental process(es) (elongation and/or thickening); dual-effect exerts opposing actions on elongation and thickening. Control plants were treated with distilled water.
Auxin is crucial for stem development
Auxin plays a central role in promoting cell division, extension, and differentiation during plant growth [90, 91]. Through an elaborate network of biosynthesis, polar transport, and signal transduction, auxin establishes a tissue-specific concentration distribution pattern, regulating stem elongation and secondary growth (Table 1; Fig. 3).
Figure 3.

Plant hormones crosstalk coregulates the differentiation of cambium stem cells into xylem. Brassinosteroid (BR) signaling, acting through the BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT1/2-WALLS ARE THIN1 (BZR1/2-WAT1) module, promotes local auxin accumulation. Gibberellin (GA) upregulates the auxin transporter PIN-FORMED 1 (PIN1) to facilitate auxin polar transportation, while ethylene induces PETAL MOVEMENT-RELATED PROTEIN 1 (PMP1), which activates YUCCA genes to stimulate auxin biosynthesis. Consequently, auxin functions as a central signal to direct cambial cell fate toward xylem differentiation. Note: Stem cross-section illustrates the spatial organization of distinct tissue regions. Each color corresponds to a specific tissue type in the legend.
Auxin biosynthesis mainly takes place in the SAM and young leaves. Exogenous application of Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) can significantly promote flower stem elongation [92]. Subsequently, auxin is polarly transported to specific tissues via PIN-FORMED (PIN) proteins, resulting in well-defined spatial distribution patterns [93], and accurately coordinate the differentiation ratio of xylem and phloem in the cambium [94, 95] (Fig. 3). The physiological functions of auxin are ultimately executed through its signal transduction pathway, achieving precise control over downstream target gene expression. The classical signaling pathway includes auxin receptors (TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE 1/AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX PROTEIN, TIR1/AFB), Aux/IAA transcriptional repressors, and AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) proteins [96]. Mutations in IAA genes can lead to dwarf phenotypes in Brassica napus [97, 98] (Table 1).
Gibberellins regulate stem internode elongation
GAs are widely involved in all stages of stem development of ornamental plants. They are mainly synthesized in SAM, root meristem, seed, and fruit [99]. The application of GA synthesis inhibitors such as paclobutrazol has been demonstrated to effectively induce dwarfism in pot flowers and increase their ornamental value [84] (Table 1; Fig. 4). The precursor substance is geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), which is converted into active gibberellins GA1, GA3, GA4, and GA7 through a series of enzymatic reactions [100]. GAs promote cell elongation and expansion by mediating cell wall elasticity and regulate the xylem/phloem ratio in the vascular cambium [94].
Figure 4.
Strategies for regulating plant architecture of ornamental plants. Two key horticultural approaches are illustrated: stem height control (left side) and stem strength enhancement (right side). For stem height control, dwarfing can be achieved under red LED light, positive day and night temperature (DIF) conditions, exogenous plant growth regulators (auxin inhibitors, GA inhibitors, and SLs), and environmental factors (limited moisture and fertilizer deficiency). For the stem strength strategy, stem thickening can be enhanced under full sunlight, exogenous plant growth regulators (melatonin, ethylene, BRs, and SLs), and nutritional supplements (e.g. CaCl₂, KSiO₃, potassium, humic acid, and nitrogen). Note: The ‘+’ symbol indicates the presence of treatments. The ‘−’ symbol indicates the absence of treatments or limited condition.
In Arabidopsis, mutations in early GA synthesis-related genes (ent-copalyl diphosphate synthase, CPS; ent-kaurene synthase, KS; ent-kaurene oxidase, KO; ent-kaurenoic acid oxidase, KAO) result in a severe dwarf phenotype, whereas mutations of later GA synthesis–related genes (GA20oxidases, GA20ox; GA3oxidases, GA3ox) result in a semidwarf phonotype, and dwarf defects can be restored by exogenous treatment of GAs [101–103]. In Chrysanthemum, GA4 accumulation is high in elongating internodes, and B-type GA receptor genes are abundantly expressed in both the internodes and leaves of extending shoots [104]. Knock-down mutants of CmGA20ox [105] and CmGA3ox [106] can form dwarf chrysanthemum varieties. GA2 oxidases (GA2ox) are involved in the catabolism of GA to maintain homeostasis. Comparative transcriptome analysis of dwarf and normal varieties revealed that the overexpression of GA2ox caused a semi-dwarf phenotype in chrysanthemum [107] and Prunus species [108].
In GA signaling, GAs can relieve the inhibition effect of DELLA proteins on plant growth through the GA receptor GIBBERELLIN-INSENSITIVE DWARF1 (GID1) [103, 109]. In Arabidopsis, gid1 mutants show shorter stems [110]. Moreover, DELLA proteins are unable to perceive GA signals, resulting in short stems, dark green leaves, and late flowering [111]. The heterologous overexpression of the Arabidopsis GIBBERELLIN INSENSITIVE (GAI) gene in chrysanthemum can be used to cultivate dwarf lines [112]. In the future, manipulating GAs and their inhibitors in the cultivation of ornamental plants can effectively control plant height, breed novel varieties, and improve ornamental value.
Brassinosteroids participate in cell wall remodeling and promote stem elongation
BRs are a type of sterol hormone widely found in plants that regulate important agronomic traits such as leaf angle and plant height. In the early stage of cell elongation, the cell wall loosening genes XTHs and EXPs are induced by BRs and then promote cell wall remodeling and cell expansion during stem growth [113, 114]. Moreover, BRs induce the synthesis of the receptor-like protein kinases HERCULES receptor kinase 1 and THESEUS1, which are required for the expression of XTHs and EXPs in the cell wall remodeling process and stem elongation [115].
Dwarf mutants that are defective in BRs biosynthesis or signaling pathways exhibit hypocotyl shortening and reduced plant height, while exogenous BR treatment can restore abnormal phenotypes, indicating that BRs play a key role in stem development [116, 117] (Table 1; Fig. 4). The key transcription factor BRI1 EMS SUPPRESSOR1/BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT1 (BES1/BZR1) in the BR signaling pathway, directly regulates the expression of cell cycle–related genes, promoting cell division and stem elongation [118] (Fig. 3). In the study of ornamental plants, the analysis of differentially expressed gene in the dwarf plants Dendranthema morifolium and Agapanthus praecox revealed that the BR content and the expression of BR-related genes were reduced, suggesting that dwarf cultivars can be bred by regulating BR content and signaling [83, 105] (Table 1).
Hormone signaling crosstalk synergistic regulation of stem development
In plants, the continuous division and differentiation of the vascular cambium during stem development are precisely coordinated by multiple plant hormone signaling pathways. Among them, auxin not only maintains the activity of cambium stem cells but also serves as a core signaling hub, establishing extensive crosstalk with other key hormones such as GAs, BRs, and ethylene, jointly regulating the fate determination and tissue differentiation of the cambium [119] (Fig. 3).
The integration among these hormone pathways often depends on specific transcriptional regulatory modules. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT-AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR-PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORS (BZR–ARF–PIF) module regulates cell elongation genes to control hypocotyl elongation, with DELLA proteins acting as repressors of this module [120, 121]. The BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT1/2-WALLS ARE THIN1 (BZR1/2-WAT1) module promotes xylem differentiation in the vascular cambium by increasing local auxin signaling level [122]. In addition, BRs synergistically interact with GAs and auxin coregulates stem development [123–125].
GAs can reinforce auxin signaling, promoting cambium homeostasis. ARF7 mediates interactions between DELLA and auxin signaling ARF/IAA proteins to regulate cambial activity [126]. GAs promote PIN1 expression in the vascular tissues, causing cambium stem cells to preferentially differentiate into xylem cells [94]. This hormonal synergy is particularly evident during wound-induced regeneration; in grafting and peeling processes, the auxin signal integrates with GAs to promote the regeneration of vascular cambium [127, 128].
Notably, this multi-hormone integration mechanism also operates in ornamental plants. In rose, ethylene-induced PETAL MOVEMENT-RELATED PROTEIN 1 (RhPMP1) upregulates the auxin synthesis genes RhYUCCA3 and RhYUCCA4 to maintain the activity of stem cells in the cambium [129]. This further illustrates how distinct hormonal pathways effect on local auxin distribution pattern to regulate stem development.
Other hormones participate in the regulation of stem development
In addition to auxin, BRs, and GAs, other plant hormones such as cytokinins (CTKs), strigolactones (SLs), and ethylene are involved in regulating the development of plant stems. Many studies have revealed that exogenous hormone treatment efficiently improves the stem phenotype of ornamental plants.
CTKs affect stem growth mainly by regulating cell division and elongation. In Arabidopsis, Cytokinin B response factors can directly activate the expression of the stem cell maintenance genes WUSCHEL and CLAVATA, enhancing the activity of the SAM [130, 131]. Moreover, CTK treatment promotes cell division by regulating the expression of the cell division cycle–related genes CYCLINS, laying a foundation for stem development [132]. In switchgrass, the increase in CTK and GAs can promote cell elongation and vascular bundle development, thereby increasing plant height [133].
SLs play dual regulatory roles in stem development by modulating both primary elongation and secondary growth (Table 1). During early stem elongation, SLs specifically inhibit hypocotyl elongation by promoting the accumulation of the ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL 5 (HY5) protein [134]. In contrast, during secondary growth, SLs convert long-distance auxin signals from the shoot apex into cellular division and differentiation responses, directly promoting cambial cell division and the proliferation of xylem and phloem, thereby driving stem thickening [135]. In addition, SLs negatively regulate shoot gravitropism, change the stem angle, and subsequently alter plant photosynthetic efficiency [136].
In dicots, ethylene stimulation leads to a triple response: inhibiting stem elongation, hypocotyl swelling, and apical hook exaggeration (Fig. 4). In stem development, ethylene controls the activity of vascular cambium stem cells by promoting auxin biosynthesis. In woody rose, ethylene affects auxin synthesis RhYUCCA10 and auxin transporter protein RhAUX2 by regulating RhPMP1, promotes stem cambium activity, and accumulates auxin in the cambium near the xylem [129]. The ethylene response factors ERF11 and ERF109 integrate auxin and gibberellin biosynthesis pathways to suppress internode elongation. In addition, ethylene can induce microtubule reconstruction to enhance hypocotyl elongation [137, 138]. In contrast, ethylene promotes stem elongation under water stress. Flooding causes an increased accumulation of ethylene in the stems, which promotes the synthesis and signal transduction of GAs and rapid stem elongation to resist stress. These studies show that ethylene has a dual effect on stem elongation [139–141].
Effects of environmental factors on stem development
Optimizing temperature management to regulate internode elongation in ornamental plants
Temperature is one of the key environmental factors affecting the development of ornamental plant stems [142] (Table 2). The temperature-dependent growth responses are not merely physiological adjustments but are based on conserved thermosensing mechanisms. In Arabidopsis, four major thermosensors, Early Flowering 3 (ELF3), UV Resistance Locus 8 (UVR8), cryptochrome 2 (CRY2), and Phytochrome B (PhyB), work synergistically to enable plants to perceive temperature changes [143]. The thermosensors activate downstream signaling cascades involving key transcription factors such as PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING FACTOR 4 (PIF4), which integrates hormonal pathways, including auxin, GAs, ethylene, and BRs, to promote cell elongation and modulate stem growth [144].
Table 2.
Effects of environmental factors on stem development.
| Factor | Treatment | Control | Species | Effect | Mechanism | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drought-stressed plant | Well-watered plant | Hibiscus acetosella | Stem elongation | Limited moisture reduced stem elongation by 44% and final plant height by 21% compared to well-watered conditions. | [145] | |
| Moisture | 50% of the control, 25% of the control | — | Callistemon citrinus | Stem elongation and thickening | Limited moisture led to a reduction of 12% of total biomass, reduce both stem diameter and plant height. | [146] |
| Blue light: 16-h light/8-h dark | White light | Chrysanthemum morflorium | Stem thickening | After 60 days of blue light treatment, plants had thinner stems than controls. | [147] | |
| Green LED, Red LED, Blue LED, and Mix RGB light | White light | Tulipa sp. | Stem elongation | Green and blue light produced longer stems and internodes than red or RGB light. Red and RGB light produced the shortest stems at full bloom. |
[148] | |
| 20 μmol m−2 s−1 Red LED | White light | Chrysanthemum morifolium | Stem elongation | Red light resulted in shorter stems and poorer-quality branches than constant light. | [149] | |
| EOD-Far Red (FR) light | Ambient light | Eustoma grandiflorum | Stem elongation | EOD-FR enhanced stem elongation, specifically increasing the length of internode and pith cell. | [150] | |
| 630 nm EOD Red light 730 nm EOD FR light | Cool white light | Euphorbia pulcherrima | Stem elongation | 30 min EOD Red light resulted in a 34% ~ 54% reduction of shoot and internode length compared to EOD FR treatment. | [151] | |
| High-pressure sodium lamps with 600–700 nm red LED or 400–500 nm blue LED | High-pressure sodium lamps | Petunia sp. | Stem elongation | Blue light promoted stem elongation, caused upright shoot orientation; however, red light reduced shoot elongation | [152] | |
| Light quality | 700 ~ 800 nm FR light 40 μmol m−2 s−1 | White light | Antirrhinum majus Zinnia elegans | Stem elongation | FR treatment increased the seedling height of A. majus by 64% ~ 134% and Z. elegans by 52% ~ 96% than controls. | [153] |
| 20% natural light | Natural light | Chrysanthemum morifolium | Stem elongation | Under 20% natural light treatment, the internode length increased. The epidermis and cortical and vascular bundle cells were deformed. | [154] | |
| Light intensity | 60% natural light | Natural light | Paeonia lactiflora | Stem elongation and thickening | Plants exposed to full sun exhibited greater plant height, stem diameter, branch number, and node number than those in shade. | [58] |
| Four solutions NH4+-N∶NO3-N | NH4 + -N:NO3-N = 0∶100 | Lilium orential | Stem elongation and thickening | NH4+-N∶NO3-N = 25∶75 (N3) treatment had the highest values in plant height and flower diameter | [155] | |
| 1000 μl/l CO2+ 0.85 μl/l NOx for 42 days | 1000 μl/l CO2 for 42 days | Rosa sp. | Stem elongation | NOx addition resulted in shorter stems in roses | [156] | |
| Purified phytase enzyme (0 EU、 5 EU、10 EU) soaking 15, 30, and 60 min | Distilled water | Brassica oleracea | Stem thickening | 10 EU of purified phytase enzyme produced the highest stem diameter under 30 and 60 min treatments. | [157] | |
| 140 g·m−3 KSiO3 | Complete fertilizer without KSiO3 | Helianthus annuus | Stem elongation and thickening | KSiO3 treatment plant showed thick, straight stems, increased flower and stem diameters, and increased height compared to the control group. | [158] | |
| Fertilizer | Humic acid at 1:600 (v/v) concentration | 0.3% NPK fertilizer (N:P2O5:K2O = 16:6:20) | Chrysanthemum morifolium | Stem thickening | Humic acid obviously improved stem diameter and shoot weight compared to the control and the NPK fertilizer. | [159] |
| Photoperiod | Different photoperiods 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, or 18 h | — | Salvia exserta | Stem elongation | A photoperiod over 8 h increased plant height by 22%–55% and 14 h of light increased node number. | [160] |
| Temperature | Six soaking temperatures and times in warm water | — | Lilium orential | Stem elongation | Bulbs treated with warm water (48°C for 3 min, repeated three times) and then in 45°C water for 30 min improved plant height. | [161] |
In orchid production, the growth rate of plant stems can be regulated by adjusting the day temperature [162]. Low temperature can inhibit hypocotyl and stem elongation. For example, warm-water treatment of lily bulbs can promote their vegetative growth and significantly increase plant height [161]. In chrysanthemum, internode length is dependent on the difference between day and night temperature (DIF) [163]. By plotting the curves showing that internode elongation changes with temperature and establishing a prediction model and formula for internode length, it was found that DIF and the absolute temperature independently regulate internode length. When DIF is positive (daytime temperature is higher than the nighttime temperature), the chrysanthemum internode length increases. Conversely, a negative DIF inhibits internode elongation, causing plant dwarfing [164] (Table 2; Fig. 4). Recent studies have focused on the reasonable regulation of DIF and absolute temperature levels to accurately manage the stem growth of ornamental plants [165].
Light intensity, light quality, and photoperiod intricately regulate stem development
Light plays an important role in plant growth. It provides energy for plant photosynthesis and acts as a signal to regulate plant photomorphogenesis, including cell differentiation, stem elongation, and secondary growth. Plants perceive light through specific photoreceptors: CRY sense blue light, phytochromes (Phy) detect red (R) and far-red (FR) light, and UVR8 perceives ultraviolet-B. These receptors initiate signal transduction involving key regulators such as transcription factors PIFs, E3 ubiquitin ligase CONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1), and HY5, ultimately modulating downstream gene expression and physiological responses [166]. Appropriate light conditions (i.e. light quality, light intensity, and photoperiod) can promote leaf photosynthesis and provide sufficient nutrients and energy for stem growth [167–169] (Table 2).
To cope with light competition, plants can adjust their stem elongation to the growth of surrounding vegetation under low-light conditions, which is referred to as the shade avoidance reaction (SAR) [170]. Light signaling pathways are closely integrated with hormonal networks; for instance, under shade conditions, the synthesis and signaling of auxin, GA, SL, and ethylene are enhanced, collectively reshaping shoot architecture [171]. In sun-loving plants such as B. napus, the elongation of stem internodes and petioles is accelerated, the number of branches decreases, and flowering occurs earlier through SAR, while high light intensity reduces plant height [172, 173].
Different light wavelengths trigger distinct regulatory pathways in stem development. Blue light regulates plant phototropism, chloroplast migration, and leaf expansion [174]. In canola, irradiation with 400 ~ 500 nm blue light increases plant height but makes stems thinner [172]. Overexpression of the blue light receptor CRYPTOCHROME 1 (CRY1) inhibits cell elongation in the hypocotyl [175]. Green light participates in the photosynthesis process to promote leaf development and stem elongation while reducing plant biomass production [148, 176]. Moreover, red light is involved in photosynthetic organ development and assimilate transport. The overexpression of phytochrome B1 (PhyB1) in chrysanthemum can hinder plant vegetative growth and reduce plant height [177].
In addition to light quality, photoperiod also plays a key role in regulating stem growth and has significant implications for production costs. Cultivars with long photoperiods increase production costs, and a reasonable short-day treatment or the selection of short-photoperiodic varieties could help control costs. Chrysanthemum flowers are sensitive to both photoperiod and light quality [178]. Therefore, understanding the interaction between light quality and photoperiod is essential for optimizing plant architecture and improving economic efficiency in production.
Water and fertilizer affect stem quality by influencing cell turgor pressure and mechanical strength, respectively
Water is essential for maintaining cell turgor pressure [179]. Adequate water promotes stem thickening and elongation and improves plant lodging resistance. Moreover, water is involved in various physiological processes such as photosynthesis and respiration, providing the necessary material and energy basis for stem growth (Table 2; Fig. 4) Insufficient water will decrease the turgor pressure of stem cells, making the stems thin and weak [180]. In Penstemon × ‘Ruby Candle’, the lack of water results in short internodes [181]. Conversely, excessive water supply in Prunus species leads to poor soil aeration, weak root functions, and plant diseases and then hinders stem development [182].
Fertilizers are important substances for maintaining plant growth and increasing productivity [183]. Adequate fertilization supplies nutrients for stem elongation and stem thickening, while overuse of fertilization is harmful to plants, soil, water, and the environment [184] poinsettia and chrysanthemum [185]. In addition, potassium (K) and silicon (Si) fertilizers increase stem thickness, enhance mechanical strength, and improve the photosynthetic efficiency of ornamental plants. High potassium treatment promotes photosynthesis, seedling growth, and flowering in chrysanthemum. In addition, the application of silicon fertilizer to petunia makes stem epidermal cells siliconized and enhances stem mechanical strength, causing straight stems and improved lodging resistance [186–188] (Table 2).
Therefore, in the ornamental plant cultivation process, adjusting water and fertilizer supplies according to the growth demand and environmental conditions results in a higher stem quality (Fig. 4).
Multi-omics and genetic transformation studies of stem development in ornamental plants
Integrated multi-omics analyses insights into stem development in ornamental plants
Stem development in ornamental plants is a complex biological process that is regulated by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Recent advances in omics techniques (genomics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, and proteomics) have provided an effective approach for studying the underlying regulatory mechanisms [189–191].
Genome sequencing has laid a foundational resource for ornamental plant research, enabling comprehensive characterization of genome architecture, identifying genetic variation, elucidating phylogenetic evolution, and deciphering population structure. These insights further enable the prediction of population responses to future environmental changes [192] and lay the foundation for the identification of functional genes [193]. For example, whole-genome sequencing of multiple Prunus species has identified many quantitative trait loci (QTL), markers and genes such as PmTAC1 linked to plant architecture, such as weeping [191, 194, 195] (Table 3).
Table 3.
Application of multi-omics in studying stem development genetics of ornamental plants.
| Omic type | Species | Material | Main conclusion | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genome | Rosaceae | Nine Rosaceae species | MdABCG28, a possible cytokinin transporter linked to the dwarfing phenotype in apple rootstocks. | [196] |
| Chrysanthemum | 200 chrysanthemum accessions | Genome-wide association studies identified 19 genes related with plant height development. | [1] | |
| Transcriptome | Gerbera hybrida | 3 developmental stages of stem | Analysis of Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in hormone pathways suggested ABA regulates stem bending independently of ethylene. | [197] |
| Rhododendron canescens | Vegetative and reproductive tissues | Identified plant hormone genes GAI, GID1, BRI1, MAX2, BRC1, etc., related to plant height and branching. | [198] | |
| Liquidambar styraciflua Liquidambar. formosana | Tetraploid and diploid hybrid sweetgum stem | DEGs were significantly enriched in plant hormone biosynthesis and signal transduction, sugar and starch metabolism, and cell cycles. | [199] | |
| Ilex verticillate | Long stem cultivar ‘Oosterwijk’ Short stem cultivar ‘Red sprite’ | Candidate DEGs associated with stem length involve phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, phenylalanine metabolism, and the auxin signaling pathway. | [200] | |
| Agapanthus praecox | 400 mg·L−1 PBZ treated scape Distilled water–treated scape |
DEGs enriched in hormone signaling, carbohydrate metabolism, and cell wall–related biological processes. | [83] | |
| Lagerstroemia sp. | Dwarf and nondwarf progenies of an F1 segregating population | DEGs involved in phytohormone pathways and cellular patterning regulation. | [201] | |
| Taxus mairei | 15 ~ 20 young stems were cut into 0.1 ~ 0.2 mm fragments | scRNA-seq has elucidated cell wall synthesis in stems by identifying distinct cell populations such as cambium, xylem, and phloem cells. | [202]. | |
| Genome and Transcriptome | Prunus mume | Young leaves for genome sequencing Straight and tortuous branches for transcriptome | Identified genes involved in cell division, development, and plant hormone signaling are essential for the tortuous branch trait formation. | [195] |
| Transcriptome and metabolome | Nymphaea tetragona | Dorsal and ventral stems were sampled on the fifth day after cutting | 607 DEGs identified in the dorsal and ventral stems revealed significant differences in plant hormone, calcium ion, glucose metabolism, and photosynthesis pathway genes within the curved stem regions. | [203] |
Given the cellular complexity of developing stems, single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) and spatial transcriptomics technologies now provide unprecedented resolution to dissect distinct cell types and their spatial organization. By enabling high-resolution analysis of gene expression at the individual cell level, these approaches clarify cell-type-specific programs driving morphogenesis [204]. These techniques are particularly valuable for dissecting the cellular programs governing ornamental stem traits, such as internode elongation, vascular patterning, and secondary growth. For instance, scRNA-seq has been utilized to construct a developmental trajectory in the stem-differentiating xylem of Liriodendron chinense and Trochodendron aralioides, identifying specialized cell types like ray and fusiform initials and providing insights into xylem cell evolution [205].
Moreover, integrating the multilayered data, such as transcriptomic, metabolomic, and proteomic profiles, can reveal the interrelationships among gene expression, metabolite changes, and protein functions, constructing a systematic regulatory network for stem development (Table 3). Therefore, the application of omics technologies provides important clues for in-depth studies of stem development in ornamental plants.
Genetic transformation advances in ornamental plant stem development
With the development of molecular technology innovations and biotechnology applications, such as transcriptome analysis, genome-wide association study (GWAS), and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) (CRISPR/Cas9) system, the functions of numerous genes and transcription factors in the regulation of stem development have been identified (Table 4). For example, a key PmWEEP gene was mapped in Prunus mume by GWAS [206]. The previous study showed that the silencing of WEEP resulted in more downward and wandering shoot orientations in P. mume [207]. Furthermore, the WEEP gene can promote negative gravitropism by establishing asymmetric auxin gradients [208].
Table 4.
Genes and their functions in the stem improvement of ornamental plants.
| Category | Gene | Species | Function | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ethylene biosynthesis | ACO1(0.821 kb)-ipt | Chrysanthemum sp. | Transgenic lines exhibited increased branching and reduced internode lengths. | [209] |
| ACS1、 ACO1 | Petunia hybrida | PhFBH4 positively regulates the transcription level of ethylene biosynthesis genes ACS1 and ACO1. PhFBH4-OX plants showed shorter internodes and dwarf trait. | [210] | |
| Gibberellin biosynthesis | GA20ox | Brassica oleracea | Jointly silencing BoDWARF, BoGA20ox, and BoSP produced a miniature plant. | [211] |
| GA2ox |
Prunus Mume, Prunus armeniaca, Prunus salicina Prunus persica |
Conserved motif and gene structure analysis showed that GAoxs were conserved in the four Prunus species. Overexpression of PmGA2ox8 in Arabidopsis leads to dwarfing phenotype. | [108] | |
|
GA20ox1 GA2ox3 |
Jasminum sambac | High GA4 level in elongating internode coincided with strong JsGA20ox1 and JsGAS1 expression in leaves, and JsGA2ox3 in internodes. | [104] | |
| gibberellin signaling | GAI | Petunia hybrida | Overexpression of the gai mutant protein, which interferes with gibberellic acid signaling, leading to stunted growth and short internodes. | [212] |
| Lignin biosynthesis | LAC4 | Paeonia lactiflora | PlLAC4, involved in lignin biosynthesis, positively regulates its deposition in herbaceous peony, enhancing stem mechanical strength. | [213] |
| HLB | Chrysanthemum morifolium | CmHLB interacted with CmKNAT7, negatively regulates secondary cell wall formation, affecting stem mechanical strength in Chrysanthemum. | [214] | |
| MAP kinase | MKS1 | Kalanchoe blossfeldiana | Heterologous overexpression of AtMKS1 result in a dwarf and delayed flowering phenotype. | [215] |
| Zinc-finger protein | LIF | Petunia hybrida | Transgenic petunia plant alters cytokinin metabolism and dramatic reduced plant height. | [216] |
| Carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase | CCD | Petunia hybrida | Loss of PhCCD8 reduced internode length. | [217] |
| Transcription factor | SPL13A | Lilium | SPL13A regulates stem elongation in the adult vegetative phase | [218] |
| WUSCEL-related homebox3 (WOX3) | Panicum virgatum | Overexpression of PvWOX3a increased stem length and internode diameter. | [133] | |
| WOX | Melastoma dodecandrum | WOX genes exhibited expression in the stem | [219] | |
| R2R3-MYBs | Paeonia lactiflora | R2R3-MYB TFs (PlMYB43, PlMYB83, PlMYB103) expressed in stem, regulated stem strength, cell wall thickness, and lignin deposition. | [213] | |
| WRKY41 | Paeonia lactiflora | PlMYB43-PlWRKY41a complex activates PlXTH4 expression to enhance stem strength by adjusting secondary cell wall thickness. | [220] | |
| SRS7 | Chrysanthemum morifolium | SRS7 overexpression downregulates GA-related genes and upregulates auxin genes, reducing internode length in transgenic pot-mums. | [221] | |
| SRS7 | Chrysanthemum spp. | Overexpression of the BrSRS7 gene was previously shown to reduce the plant height of chrysanthemums | [222] | |
| SHI | Kalanchoe blossfeldiana | Transferring the Arabidopsis short internode (shi) gene into Kalanchoe resulted in a dwarf phenotype, reduced plant height and diameter. | [223] |
In addition to strategies aimed at manipulating gene expression, the direct application of microbial systems also offers a route to inducing significant phenotypic changes in stem development. Agrobacterium rhizogenes carry a root-inducing (Ri) plasmid, which enables T-DNA integration carrying rolA, rolB, rolC, and rolD oncogenes into host plant genomes [224, 225]. Both A. rhizogenes and rol-transgenic plants presented hairy root phenotypes. Surprisingly, these transgenic plants always exhibit a dwarf phenotype, reduced apical dominance, and altered flowering habits. Horticultural applications exploit these phenotypic changes to create compact architecture in ornamental plants [226]. Compared to wild-type controls, Pelargonium sp. transformed with wild-type Ri plasmids presented 40% ~ 60% height reduction [227]. Similarly, the height of Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Ri-transgenic lines was reduced by 51.9% compared with that of control plants [228]. The overexpression of the rol gene in K. blossfeldiana also leads to dwarf and compact plants [229]. These morphological modifications increase ornamental value by improving plant architecture.
To achieve even greater precision and control on stem traits, recent advances have focused on directly editing key regulatory genes. CRISPR-Cas system, which originates from the bacterial immune system, serves as a gene-editing tool. A guide RNA (gRNA) directs the Cas9 enzyme to targeted DNA sites for cleavage, enabling precise gene editing [230]. This system has shown great potential in genetic breeding and trait improvement of horticultural crops, such as accelerating compact plant type breeding, optimizing stem quality, and improving lodging resistance, greatly shortening the breeding cycle of commercial flowers such as chrysanthemum, rose, and lily [231, 232] (Table 4).
Future perspectives
Advanced technologies for stem structure and cell wall characterization
Advances in computer vision and microscopic imaging technologies are enabling visualization and quantification of plant stem architecture and cell wall composition.
In stem phenotyping, micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) enables nondestructive, multilayered scanning, generating high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) visualization of stem internal anatomy, surpassing traditional paraffin sectioning and enabling tracking during whole growth process [233]. Coupled with vessel parser software, micro-CT allows recognize and quantitative analysis of different tissues, accurately parsing and calculating the shape, number, and distribution of vascular bundles in crops [234]. Advancing this approach, recent studies have integrated micro-CT with large-volume fully automated cell reconstruction (LVACR) were used to establish the multicellular morphological characteristics of plant organs, comprehensively displaying the fine structure and dynamic changes in plant tissues and organs [235]. This study provides profound insights into the precise spatial arrangement and cell behavior of multicellular organisms. Complementing these structural imaging techniques, virtual staining technology (VST) integrates (deep) machine learning, converting bright-field microscope images into virtual staining images highly consistent with actual fluorescence images, thereby achieving precise and label-free visualization of specific cells [236, 237]. Therefore, VST provides high-precision cell morphological data, offering a new tool for plant cell biology research.
Complementing structural imaging, frontier techniques are deepening insights into the nanoscale composition and mechanics of the plant cell wall. The main components of the cell wall include cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, and lignin, which form a complex cross-linked network. This structure is a natural nanostructure critical for stem strength, elongation, and morphogenesis [238]. Although histochemical staining and fluorescence labeling have been the main tools for studying cell wall composition and structure, they lack the ability to observe dynamic changes in living cell walls in real time and are unable to accurately quantify multiple components. In contrast, emerging technologies enable dynamic, multimodal, and quantitative characterization of cell wall architecture.
Recently, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and spectral imaging techniques have further advanced the understanding of cell walls. NMR provides chemical information on cell wall components, AFM quantifies the mechanical properties of cell walls at the nanoscale, infrared spectral imaging maps the spatial distributions of components such as cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin [239]. Confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) are two imaging techniques providing new tools for studying the microstructure of the cell wall. They can simultaneously obtain spectral and spatial data without damaging the sample and identify different components in the cell wall [240].
These technologies enable precise tracking of stem development and structural analysis, providing a robust foundation for breeding ornamental plants with improved stem quality, architecture, and mechanical performance.
Precise design strategies for ornamental plants in the era of Breeding 5.0
With the continuous development of the global horticultural industry, ornamental plants are required to meet diverse and personalized market needs. Consumers now focus on shoot architecture, alongside traditional traits such as flower size and color. The ideal plant height is more convenient for transportation and commercial placement, while the stem thickness enhances lodging resistance in outdoor landscapes. Thus, the precise design and breeding of ornamental plant stem traits have become a key route for meeting the market demand in industrial upgrades.
The evolution of breeding methodologies has progressed through several generations, with Breeding 4.0 emphasizes the use of genomics, gene editing, and molecular marker–assisted breeding to achieve better varieties [241]. While Breeding 4.0 significantly improved breeding efficiency through molecular techniques, it still relies heavily on prior knowledge of gene functions and trait associations. This reliance limits its capacity to address complex, polygenic traits such as stem architecture in ornamental plants. Looking ahead, the design of ornamental plant stem traits will enter a new era, Breeding 5.0. Breeding 5.0 introduces the concept of intelligent breeding of smart varieties, integrating advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and bioinformatics to achieve precise phenotypic design, including stem morphology. Breeding 5.0 aims to cultivate intelligent varieties with optimized resource utilization efficiency and high yield and quality [242].
To realize smart breeding in ornamental plants, we propose a framework integrating four key technological steps (Fig. 5). First, we establish a high-resolution phenotypic and omics database. Robotic platforms and multi-sensor imaging system capture real-time 3D plant architecture, physiological indexes, and micro-environmental data. At the same time, establish a multi-omics database, including pan-genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics to profiles the molecular basis of key ornamental traits. Second, AI-aided predictive modeling is applied to construct developmental models and decode genotype-to-phenotype associations. Through AI-aided GWAS, key genetic loci and regulatory networks governing important ornamental characteristics are systematically identified. Third, guided by AI-designed CRISPR/Cas editing targets, precision breeding is implemented via automated genetic transformation platforms. This enables rapid development of improved lines tailored to specific breeding goals, such as enhancing vase life in cut flowers, compacting growth for vertical greening, and improving shade tolerance for indoor pot flowers. Finally, cultivation validation and dynamic phenotypic monitoring are performed in a smart greenhouse. These systems allow quantitative assessment of breeding objectives and phenotypic stability, generating closed-loop feedback data that drives the iterative optimization of the breeding pipeline (Fig. 5).
Figure 5.
Strategies for smart ornamental plant breeding. A closed-loop smart breeding framework for ornamental plants that integrates high-resolution phenotyping with multi-omics profiling, leverages AI to decode genotype–phenotype relationships and prioritize editing targets, enables precision genome editing via automated platforms, and validates improved lines through dynamic monitoring in smart greenhouses to support iterative pipeline optimization.
However, the commercialization of gene-edited ornamental plants still faces practical hurdles, including potential off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas systems, technical difficulties posed by genomic complexities such as high heterozygosity and polyploidy [243], and the challenge of coordinating multi-gene editing for complex polygenic traits like flower color, flower shape, and vase life [244], all of which pose significant quality control challenges for scalable production.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32071817), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2025A1515012658), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation General Funding Program (2025185168144137771928).
We are grateful to Yin Xin (Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) and Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva (independent researcher) for their insightful comments and constructive suggestions, which significantly improved this manuscript.
Contributor Information
Xi Chen, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China.
Chang Guo, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China.
Xingle Li, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China.
Meiting Wang, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiaonan Yu, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China.
Wei Zhu, School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing 100083, China; Environmental Horticulture Research Institute, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Author contributions
Xi Chen (Writing—review & editing, Visualization, Data curation, Conceptualization), Chang Guo (Writing—original draft), Xingle Li (Visualization), Meiting Wang (Visualization), Xiaonan Yu (Project administration, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition), and Wei Zhu (Writing—review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition)
Conflicts of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
References
- 1. Zhang X, Su J, Jia F. et al. Genetic architecture and genomic prediction of plant height-related traits in chrysanthemum. Hortic Res. 2024b;11:uhad236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sanchez P, Nehlin L, Greb T. From thin to thick: major transitions during stem development. Trends Plant Sci. 2012;17:113–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Yamaji N, Ma JF. Node-controlled allocation of mineral elements in Poaceae. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017;39:18–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Mekapogu M, Kwon O-K, Song H-Y. et al. Towards the improvement of ornamental attributes in chrysanthemum: recent progress in biotechnological advances. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:12284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dinneny JR, Yanofsky MF. Vascular patterning: xylem or phloem? Curr Biol. 2004;14:R112–4 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Furuta KM, Hellmann E, Helariutta Y. Molecular control of cell specification and cell differentiation during procambial development. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:607–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lewis AM. Plant stems: physiology and functional morphology. Tree Physiol. 1997;17:603–4 [Google Scholar]
- 8. Zanne AE, Falster DS. Plant functional traits-linkages among stem anatomy, plant performance and life history. New Phytol. 2010;185:348–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kulkarni AA, Thengane S, Krishnamurthy K. Direct shoot regeneration from node, internode, hypocotyl and embryo explants of Withania somnifera. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2000;62:203–9 [Google Scholar]
- 10. Oka GM, Triwiyono A, Awaludin A. et al. Effects of node, internode and height position on the mechanical properties of Gigantochloa atroviolacea bamboo. Procedia Eng. 2014;95:31–7 [Google Scholar]
- 11. Falster DS, Westoby M. Plant height and evolutionary games. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18:337–43 [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fernandez MGS, Becraft PW, Yin Y. et al. From dwarves to giants? Plant height manipulation for biomass yield. Trends Plant Sci. 2009;14:454–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Shah DU, Reynolds TPS, Ramage MH. The strength of plants: theory and experimental methods to measure the mechanical properties of stems. J Exp Bot. 2017;68:4497–516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Galindo-Castaneda T, Hartmann M, Lynch JP. Location: root architecture structures rhizosphere microbial associations. J Exp Bot. 2024;75:594–604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Iswanto ABB, Kang H, Park S. et al. Recent advances in improving yield and immunity through transcription factor engineering. J Integr Plant Biol. 2025;67:2005–27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Zhao D, de Voil, Sadras VO. et al. The plasticity of root traits and their effects on crop yield and yield stability. Plant Soil. 2025a;513:367–82 [Google Scholar]
- 17. He F, Liang T, Zhao R. et al. Modelling the lateral behavior of trunk-root-soil systems with representative branching patterns using a combined p-y framework. Comput Geotech. 2026;189:107654 [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bergstrand KJI. Methods for growth regulation of greenhouse produced ornamental pot- and bedding plants - a current review. Folia Hortic. 2017;29:63–74 [Google Scholar]
- 19. Neto AEF, Boldrin KVF, Mattson NS. Nutrition and quality in ornamental plants. Ornam Hortic. 2015;21:139–50 [Google Scholar]
- 20. Conway SJ, Drinnan AN. Analysis of surface growth in the conifer shoot apical meristem. Int J Plant Sci. 2017;178:273–87 [Google Scholar]
- 21. Serrano-Mislata A, Sablowski R. The pillars of land plants: new insights into stem development. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2018;45:11–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Bowman JL, Eshed Y. Formation and maintenance of the shoot apical meristem. Trends Plant Sci. 2000;5:110–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Shapiro BE, Tobin C, Mjolsness E. et al. Analysis of cell division patterns in the Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:4815–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Davière JM, Wild M, Regnault T. et al. Class I TCP-DELLA interactions in inflorescence shoot apex determine plant height. Curr Biol. 2014;24:1923–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Leiboff S, Li X, Hu HC. et al. Genetic control of morphometric diversity in the maize shoot apical meristem. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Moraes TS, Dornelas MC, Martinelli AP. FT/TFL1: calibrating plant architecture. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Assefa T, Otyama PI, Brown AV. et al. Genome-wide associations and epistatic interactions for internode number, plant height, seed weight and seed yield in soybean. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hu JN, Li G, Mo HL. et al. Crop node detection and internode length estimation using an improved YOLOv5 model. Agriculture-Basel. 2023;13:473 [Google Scholar]
- 29. Wu C, Bai Y, Cao Z. et al. Plasticity in the morphology of growing bamboo: a bayesian analysis of exogenous treatment effects on plant height, internode length, and internode numbers. Plants. 2023;12:1713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Gaur VS, Channappa G, Chakraborti M. et al. ‘Green revolution’ dwarf gene sd1 of rice has gigantic impact. Brief Funct Genomics. 2020;19:390–409 [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nam KH, Li J. BRI1/BAK1, a receptor kinase pair mediating brassinosteroid signaling. Cell. 2002;110:203–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Pan H, Zhou R, Louie GV. et al. Structural studies of cinnamoyl-CoA reductase and cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase, key enzymes of monolignol biosynthesis. Plant Cell. 2014;26:3709–27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ponniah SK, Shang ZH, Akbudak MA. et al. Down-regulation of hydroxycinnamoyl CoA: shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase, cinnamoyl CoA reductase, and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase leads to lignin reduction in rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. japonica cv. Nipponbare). Plant Biotechnol Rep. 2017;11:17–27 [Google Scholar]
- 34. Kumar M, Turner S. Plant cellulose synthesis: CESA proteins crossing kingdoms. Phytochemistry. 2015;112:91–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Zhao Y, Wang X, Gao J. et al. The MYB61-STRONG2 module regulates culm diameter and lodging resistance in rice. J Integr Plant Biol. 2025b;67:243–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Herburger K, Frankova L, Picmanova M. et al. Hetero-transb-glucanase produces cellulose–xyloglucan covalent bonds in the cell walls of structural plant tissues and is stimulated by expansin. Mol Plant. 2020;13:1047–62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Miedes E, Zarra I, Hoson T. et al. Xyloglucan endotransglucosylase and cell wall extensibility. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168:196–203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Yuan W, Yao F, Liu Y. et al. Identification of the xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase genes and the role of PagXTH12 in drought resistance in poplar. For Res. 2024;4:0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Lu R, Zhang J, Wu YW. et al. bHLH transcription factors LP1 and LP2 regulate longitudinal cell elongation. Plant Physiol. 2021b;187:2577–91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Wu Q, Zhong S, Shi H. MicroProteins: dynamic and accurate regulation of protein activity. J Integr Plant Biol. 2022;64:812–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zhong C, Patra B, Tang Y. et al. A transcriptional hub integrating gibberellin-brassinosteroid signals to promote seed germination in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2021;72:4708–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Awale P, McSteen P. Hormonal regulation of inflorescence and intercalary meristems in grasses. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2023;76:102451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Yu KMJ, Oliver J, McKinley B. et al. Bioenergy sorghum stem growth regulation: intercalary meristem localization, development, and gene regulatory network analysis. Plant J. 2022;112:476–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Niu X, Fu D. The roles of BLH transcription factors in plant development and environmental response. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:3731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Tsuda K, Abraham-Juarez MJ, Maeno A. et al. KNOTTED1 cofactors, BLH12 and BLH14, regulate internode patterning and vein anastomosis in maize. Plant Cell. 2017;29:1105–18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Baucher M, El Jaziri M, Vandeputte O. From primary to secondary growth: origin and development of the vascular system. J Exp Bot. 2007;58:3485–501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Du J, Wang YC, Chen WF. et al. High-resolution anatomical and spatial transcriptome analyses reveal two types of meristematic cell pools within the secondary vascular tissue of poplar stem. Mol Plant. 2023;16:809–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Tang Z, Liang YQ, Wang ML. et al. Effect of mechanical properties of rice stem and its fiber on the strength of straw rope. Ind Crop Prod. 2022;180:114729 [Google Scholar]
- 49. Cosgrove DJ, Li LC, Cho HT. et al. The growing world of expansins. Plant Cell Physiol. 2002;43:1436–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Somerville C. Cellulose synthesis in higher plants. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006;22:53–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Saxena IM, Brown RM Jr. Cellulose biosynthesis: current views and evolving concepts. Ann Bot. 2005;96:9–21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Taylor NG, Howells RM, Huttly AK. et al. Interactions among three distinct CesA proteins essential for cellulose synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:1450–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Huang Y, Ren A, Wan Y. et al. Effect of the pectin contents and nanostructure on the stem straightness of two Paeonia lactiflora cultivars. PeerJ. 2023;11:e15166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Zhao H, Wang S, Yang R. et al. Side chain of confined xylan affects cellulose integrity leading to bending stem with reduced mechanical strength in ornamental plants. Carbohydr Polym. 2024;329:121787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Hayashi T, Kaida R. Functions of xyloglucan in plant cells. Mol Plant. 2011;4:17–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Hu H, Zhang R, Zhao Y. et al. Cell wall remodeling confers plant architecture with distinct wall structure in Nelumbo nucifera. Plant J. 2024a;120:1392–409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Yang Y, Huang Y, Ren A. et al. Xylem development and phloem conductivity in relation to the stem mechanical strength of Paeonia lactiflora. J Plant Physiol. 2023;283:153963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Zhao D, Hao Z, Tao J. Effects of shade on plant growth and flower quality in the herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora pall.). Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012;61:187–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ye Z. Association of caffeoyl coenzyme a 3-O-methyltransferase expression with lignifying tissues in several dicot plants. Plant Physiol. 1997;115:1341–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Wolf S, Hematy K, Hofte H. Growth control and cell wall signaling in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63:381–407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Philosoph-Hadas S, Meir S, Rosenberger I. et al. Regulation of the gravitropic response and ethylene biosynthesis in gravistimulated snapdragon spikes by calcium chelators and ethylene inhibitors. Plant Physiol. 1996;110:301–10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. García-González A, Soriano-Melgar L d AA, Cid-López ML. et al. Effects of calcium oxide nanoparticles on vase life of gerbera cut flowers. Sci Hortic. 2022;291:110532 [Google Scholar]
- 63. Li C, Tao J, Zhao D. et al. Effect of calcium sprays on mechanical strength and cell wall fractions of herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora pall.) inflorescence stems. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:4704–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Yu X, Lu G, Cheng F. et al. Effect of calcium on the stem quality of cut herbaceous peony. J Hunan AgricUniv (Nat Sci). 2011;36:531–5 [Google Scholar]
- 65. Sheng H, Chen S. Plant silicon-cell wall complexes: identification, model of covalent bond formation and biofunction. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;155:13–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Luyckx M, Hausman JF, Lutts S. et al. Impact of silicon in plant biomass production: focus on bast fibres, hypotheses, and perspectives. Plants (Basel). 2017;6:37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Zhao D, Xu C, Luan Y. et al. Silicon enhances stem strength by promoting lignin accumulation in herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora pall.). Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;190:769–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Jin Z, Li P, Huang R. et al. Natural variation in PtobZIP18 confers the trade-off between stem growth and drought tolerance in Populus. Plant Biotechnol J. 2025;23:4633–49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Shi L, Tu F, Yang J. Mechanical behaviors of porous bionic structure of lotus stem. Int J Solids Struct. 2024;290:112665 [Google Scholar]
- 70. Zou M, Xu S, Wei C. et al. A bionic method for the crashworthiness design of thin-walled structures inspired by bamboo. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016;101:222–30 [Google Scholar]
- 71. Lou T, Lv S, Wang J. et al. Cell size and xylem differentiation regulating genes from Salicornia europaea contribute to plant salt tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2024;47:2640–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Wei Q, He M, Hu X. Effects of exogenous brassinolide on growth and physiological characteristics of Matthiola incana L.seedlings under salt stress. Southwest China J Agric Sci. 2023;36:1165–71 [Google Scholar]
- 73. Li X, Tian X, Li W. Effects of EBR and MT on the photosynthetic physiology of lily seedlings under salt alkali stress. Northern Hortic. 2024a;19:52–61 [Google Scholar]
- 74. Litwińczuk W, Jacek B. Growth of Paulownia ssp. interspecific hybrid ‘Oxytree’ micropropagated nursery plants under the influence of plant-growth regulators. Agronomy. 2023;13:2474 [Google Scholar]
- 75. Zhao W, Dong H, Hou H. et al. Establishment of a highly efficient In vitro regeneration system for Rhododendron aureum. Forests. 2023;14:1335 [Google Scholar]
- 76. Çelikel FG, Zhang Q, Zhang Y. et al. A cytokinin analog thidiazuron suppresses shoot growth in potted rose plants via the gibberellic acid pathway. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:639717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Yari V, Roein Z, Sabouri A. Exogenous 5-azaCitidine accelerates flowering and external GA (3) increases ornamental value in Iranian anemone accessions. Sci Rep. 2021;11:7478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Cornea-Cipcigan M, Pamfil D, Sisea CR. et al. Gibberellic acid can improve seed germination and ornamental quality of selected cyclamen species grown under short and long days. Agronomy. 2020;10:516 [Google Scholar]
- 79. Lee HB, Im NH, An SK. et al. Changes of growth and inflorescence initiation by exogenous gibberellic Acid3 and 6-benzylaminopurine application in Phalaenopsis orchids. Agronomy. 2021a;11:196 [Google Scholar]
- 80. Ranwala AP, Legnani G, Miller WB. Minimizing stem elongation during spray applications of gibberellin4+7 and benzyladenine to prevent leaf chlorosis in easter lilies. HortScience. 2003;38:1210–3 [Google Scholar]
- 81. Oh W, Kim KS. Light intensity and temperature regulate petiole elongation by controlling the content of and sensitivity to gibberellin in Cyclamen persicum. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2014;55:175–82 [Google Scholar]
- 82. Al-Khassawneh NM, Karam NS, Shibli RA. Growth and flowering of black iris (Dinsm.) following treatment with plant growth regulators. Sci Hortic. 2006;107:187–93 [Google Scholar]
- 83. Zhang D, Ren L, Yue JH. et al. RNA-Seq-based transcriptome analysis of stem development and dwarfing regulation in Agapanthus praecox ssp. orientalis (Leighton) Leighton. Gene. 2015;565:252–67 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Zhu X, Chai M, Li Y. et al. Global transcriptome profiling analysis of inhibitory effects of paclobutrazol on leaf growth in lily (Lilium Longiflorum-Asiatic hybrid). Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Bálint J, Benedek K, Csorba AB. Assessing the effect of plant growth stimulants and retardants on Cyclamen “Halios F1 Salmon rose” cultivar. Horticulturae. 2024;10:53 [Google Scholar]
- 86. Ding H, Liu J, Wang W. et al. Dwarfing effect of uniconazole on Curcuma alismatifolia and its tissue anatomy. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis. 2013;25:975–9 [Google Scholar]
- 87. Zhao D, Luan Y, Shi W. et al. Melatonin enhances stem strength by increasing lignin content and secondary cell wall thickness in herbaceous peony. J Exp Bot. 2022a;73:5974–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Sahraei F, Solgi M, Taghizadeh M. The application of methyl jasmonate in combination with ascorbic acid on morphological traits and some biochemical parameters in red willow. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2023;29:185–93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Currey CJ, Lopez RG, Krug BA. et al. Substrate drenches containing flurprimidol suppress height of ‘Nellie White’ easter lilies. HortTech. 2012;22:164–8 [Google Scholar]
- 90. Fischer U, Kucukoglu M, Helariutta Y. et al. The dynamics of cambial stem cell activity. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019;70:293–319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Wang D, Chen Y, Li W. et al. Vascular cambium: the source of wood formation. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:700928 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Ji Y, Xue L, Lei J. Regulation of scape elongation through gibberellin and auxin detected by hormone metabolomic profiling in Clivia miniata. Ornam Plant Res. 2025;5:e041 [Google Scholar]
- 93. Ljung K, Bhalerao RP, Sandberg G. Sites and homeostatic control of auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis during vegetative growth. Plant J. 2001;28:465–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Makila R, Wybouw B, Smetana O. et al. Gibberellins promote polar auxin transport to regulate stem cell fate decisions in cambium. Nat Plants. 2023;9:631–44 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Smetana O, Makila R, Lyu M. et al. High levels of auxin signalling define the stem-cell organizer of the vascular cambium. Nature. 2019;565:485–9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Vanneste S, Pei Y, Friml J. Mechanisms of auxin action in plant growth and development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2025;26:648–66 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Wei T, Zhang L, Zhu R. et al. A gain-of-function mutant of IAA7 inhibits stem elongation by transcriptional repression of EXPA5 genes in Brassica napus. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:9018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Zheng M, Hu M, Yang H. et al. Three BnaIAA7 homologs are involved in auxin/brassinosteroid-mediated plant morphogenesis in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Plant Cell Rep. 2019;38:883–97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Daviere JM, Achard P. Gibberellin signaling in plants. Development. 2013;140:1147–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Yamaguchi S. Gibberellin metabolism and its regulation. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:225–51 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Hedden P. The current status of research on gibberellin biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020;61:1832–49 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Lange T, Pimenta Lange MJ. The multifunctional dioxygenases of gibberellin synthesis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2020;61:1869–79 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Xu H, Liu Q, Yao T. et al. Shedding light on integrative GA signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014;21:89–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Zhang H, Wang W, Huang J. et al. Role of gibberellin and its three GID1 receptors in Jasminum sambac stem elongation and flowering. Planta. 2021b;255:17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Xie Q, Chen G, Liu Q. et al. Dual silencing of DmCPD and DmGA20ox genes generates a novel miniature and delayed-flowering Dendranthema morifolium variety. Mol Breed. 2015;35:67 [Google Scholar]
- 106. Zhang X, Ding L, Song A. et al. DWARF AND ROBUST PLANT regulates plant height via modulating gibberellin biosynthesis in chrysanthemum. Plant Physiol. 2022;190:2484–500 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Tong Z, Hong B, Yang Y. et al. Overexpression of two chrysanthemum DgDREB1 group genes causing delayed flowering or dwarfism in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;71:115–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Li X, Zhang J, Guo X. et al. Genome-wide analysis of the gibberellin-oxidases family members in four Prunus species and a functional analysis of PmGA2ox8 in plant height. Int J Mol Sci. 2024b;25:8697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Willige BC, Ghosh S, Nill C. et al. The DELLA domain of GA INSENSITIVE mediates the interaction with the GA INSENSITIVE DWARF1A gibberellin receptor of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19:1209–20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Griffiths J, Murase K, Rieu I. et al. Genetic characterization and functional analysis of the GID1 gibberellin receptors in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006;18:3399–414 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Wen C, Chang C. Arabidopsis RGL1 encodes a negative regulator of gibberellin responses. Plant Cell. 2002;14:87–100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Petty LM, Harberd NP, Carré IA. et al. Expression of the Arabidopsis gai gene under its own promoter causes a reduction in plant height in chrysanthemum by attenuation of the gibberellin response. Plant Sci. 2003;164:175–82 [Google Scholar]
- 113. Chaudhary A, Hsiao YC, Jessica Yeh FL. et al. FERONIA signaling maintains cell wall integrity during brassinosteroid-induced cell expansion in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2025;18:603–18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Wang B, Smith SM, Li J. Genetic regulation of shoot architecture. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2018;69:437–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Guo H, Li L, Ye H. et al. Three related receptor-like kinases are required for optimal cell elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:7648–53 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Choe S, Dilkes BP, Gregory BD. et al. The Arabidopsis dwarf1 mutant is defective in the conversion of 24-methylenecholesterol to campesterol in brassinosteroid biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 1999;119:897–908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Hong Z, Ueguchi-Tanaka M, Fujioka S. et al. The Rice brassinosteroid-deficient dwarf2 mutant, defective in the rice homolog of Arabidopsis DIMINUTO/DWARF1, is rescued by the endogenously accumulated alternative bioactive brassinosteroid, dolichosterone. Plant Cell. 2005;17:2243–54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Yin Y, Wang ZY, Mora-Garcia S. et al. BES1 accumulates in the nucleus in response to brassinosteroids to regulate gene expression and promote stem elongation. Cell. 2002;109:181–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Brackmann K, Qi J, Gebert M. et al. Spatial specificity of auxin responses coordinates wood formation. Nat Commun. 2018;9:875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Bai MY, Shang JX, Oh E. et al. Brassinosteroid, gibberellin and phytochrome impinge on a common transcription module in Arabidopsis. Nat Cell Biol. 2012;14:810–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Liu K, Li Y, Chen X. et al. ERF72 interacts with ARF6 and BZR1 to regulate hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2018b;69:3933–47 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Lee J, Kim H, Park SG. et al. Brassinosteroid-BZR1/2-WAT1 module determines the high level of auxin signalling in vascular cambium during wood formation. New Phytol. 2021b;230:1503–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Hou L, Zhu L, Hao M. et al. Brassinosteroids enhance gibberellic acid biosynthesis to promote cotton fibre cell elongation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2025;23:1213–5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Tong H, Xiao Y, Liu D. et al. Brassinosteroid regulates cell elongation by modulating gibberellin metabolism in rice. Plant Cell. 2014;26:4376–93 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Unterholzner SJ, Rozhon W, Papacek M. et al. Brassinosteroids are master regulators of gibberellin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2015;27:2261–72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Hu J, Su H, Cao H. et al. AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR7 integrates gibberellin and auxin signaling via interactions between DELLA and AUX/IAA proteins to regulate cambial activity in poplar. Plant Cell. 2022;34:2688–707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Serivichyaswat PT, Kareem A, Feng M. et al. Auxin signaling in the cambium promotes tissue adhesion and vascular formation during Arabidopsis graft healing. Plant Physiol. 2024;196:754–62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Zhang Y, Wang L, Wu Y. et al. Gibberellin promotes cambium reestablishment during secondary vascular tissue regeneration after girdling in an auxin-dependent manner in Populus. J Integr Plant Biol. 2024c;66:86–102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Yu Q, Cheng C, Zhou X. et al. Ethylene controls cambium stem cell activity via promoting local auxin biosynthesis. New Phytol. 2023b;239:964–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Cammarata J, Morales Farfan C, Scanlon MJ. et al. Cytokinin-CLAVATA cross-talk is an ancient mechanism regulating shoot meristem homeostasis in land plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:e2116860119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Wang J, Tian C, Zhang C. et al. Cytokinin signaling activates WUSCHEL expression during axillary meristem initiation. Plant Cell. 2017;29:1373–87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Liu H, Zhang H, Dong YX. et al. DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE1-mediated shoot regeneration is regulated by cytokinin-induced cell cycle in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2018a;217:219–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Yang R, Wu Z, Bai C. et al. Overexpression of PvWOX3a in switchgrass promotes stem development and increases plant height. Hortic Res. 2021;8:252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Jia KP, Luo Q, He SB. et al. Strigolactone-regulated hypocotyl elongation is dependent on cryptochrome and phytochrome signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2014;7:528–40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Agusti J, Herold S, Schwarz M. et al. Strigolactone signaling is required for auxin-dependent stimulation of secondary growth in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:20242–7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Sang D, Chen D, Liu G. et al. Strigolactones regulate rice tiller angle by attenuating shoot gravitropism through inhibiting auxin biosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:11199–204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Ma Q, Wang X, Sun J. et al. Coordinated regulation of hypocotyl cell elongation by light and ethylene through a microtubule destabilizing protein. Plant Physiol. 2018;176:678–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Yang C, Lu X, Ma B. et al. Ethylene signaling in rice and Arabidopsis: conserved and diverged aspects. Mol Plant. 2015;8:495–505 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Hattori Y, Nagai K, Furukawa S. et al. The ethylene response factors SNORKEL1 and SNORKEL2 allow rice to adapt to deep water. Nature. 2009;460:1026–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Kuroha T, Nagai K, Gamuyao R. et al. Ethylene-gibberellin signaling underlies adaptation of rice to periodic flooding. Science. 2018;361:181–6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Lyu Y, Dong X, Niu S. et al. An orchestrated ethylene-gibberellin signaling cascade contributes to mesocotyl elongation and emergence of rice direct seeding. J Integr Plant Biol. 2024;66:1427–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH. Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim Extremes. 2015;10:4–10 [Google Scholar]
- 143. Luo X, Liu X, Zheng N. et al. Molecular mechanisms of temperature-mediated flowering regulation: from Arabidopsis to short-day crops. Plant Cell Environ. 2025;48:7020–37 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Lu HP, Wang JJ, Wang MJ. et al. Roles of plant hormones in thermomorphogenesis. Stress Biol. 2021a;1:20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Bayer A, Ruter J, van Iersel MW. Elongation of Hibiscus acetosella under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions. HortScience. 2016;51:1384–8 [Google Scholar]
- 146. Alvarez S, Sanchez-Blanco MJ. Comparison of individual and combined effects of salinity and deficit irrigation on physiological, nutritional and ornamental aspects of tolerance in Callistemon laevis plants. J Plant Physiol. 2015;185:65–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Liu T, Cheng P, Zhao K. et al. Effects of blue light treatment on growth of summer-flowering chrysanthemum “Yuuka” tissue culture seedlings and its molecular mechanism. Jiangsu Agric Sci. 2022;50:150–6 [Google Scholar]
- 148. Roh YS, Yoo YK. Light quality of light emitting diodes affects growth, chlorophyll fluorescence and phytohormones of Tulip ‘Lasergame’. Hortic Environ Biotechnol. 2023;64:245–55 [Google Scholar]
- 149. Nissim-Levi A, Kitron M, Nishri Y. et al. Effects of blue and red LED lights on growth and flowering of Chrysanthemum morifolium. Sci Hortic. 2019;254:77–83 [Google Scholar]
- 150. Takemura Y, Kuroki K, Katou M. et al. Gene expression changes triggered by end-of-day far-red light treatment on early developmental stages of Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinn. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Islam MA, Tarkowská D, Clarke JL. et al. Impact of end-of-day red and far-red light on plant morphology and hormone physiology of poinsettia. Sci Hortic. 2014;174:77–86 [Google Scholar]
- 152. Gautam P, Terfa MT, Olsen JE. et al. Red and blue light effects on morphology and flowering of petunia×hybrida. Sci Hortic. 2015;184:171–8 [Google Scholar]
- 153. Zhang M, Park Y, Runkle ES. Regulation of extension growth and flowering of seedlings by blue radiation and the red to far-red ratio of sole-source lighting. Sci Hortic. 2020;272:109478 [Google Scholar]
- 154. Han S, Zhu XQ, Pei DL. Research of Chrysanthemum morifolium in morphology, tissue structure and gene expression. J Sichuan Agric Univ. 2019;37:34–40 [Google Scholar]
- 155. Su D, Fang Z, Li YL. et al. Effect of different NH4+-N/NO3-—N ratios on the growth of Lilium. Northern Hortic. 2012;02:67–9. [Google Scholar]
- 156. Mortensen LM. Nitrogen oxides produced during CO2 enrichment. New Phytol. 1985;101:103–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Dikbas N, Parlakova Karagoz F, Ucar S. et al. Ornamental cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) responses to phytase enzyme purified from lactobacillus coryniformis application. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2023;70:1407–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Kamenidou S, Cavins TJ, Marek SM. Silicon supplements affect horticultural traits of greenhouse-produced ornamental sunflowers. HortScience. 2008;43:236–9 [Google Scholar]
- 159. Fan HM, Wang XW, Sun X. et al. Effects of humic acid derived from sediments on growth, photosynthesis and chloroplast ultrastructure in chrysanthemum. Sci Hortic. 2014;177:118–23 [Google Scholar]
- 160. Mata DA, Botto JF. Photoperiod, light, and temperature requirements to control plant architecture and flowering time in Salvia exserta. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2011;86:408–14 [Google Scholar]
- 161. Wu SZ, Lu JL, Li H. et al. The effects of variable temperature treatment on the growth and development of lily (Lilium spp.) and the control of Rhizoglyphus echinopus. J Yangzhou Univ. 2021;42:87–91 [Google Scholar]
- 162. Chen C. Evaluation of the effect of temperature on a stem elongation model of Phalaenopsis. Horticulturae. 2019;5:76 [Google Scholar]
- 163. Schouten RE, Carvalho SM, Heuvelink E. et al. Modelling of temperature-controlled internode elongation applied to chrysanthemum. Ann Bot. 2002;90:353–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. Carvalho SM, Heuvelink E, Cascais R. et al. Effect of day and night temperature on internode and stem length in chrysanthemum: is everything explained by DIF? Ann Bot. 2002;90:111–8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Van Der Ploeg A, Heuvelink E. The influence of temperature on growth and development of chrysanthemum cultivars. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 2006;81:174–82 [Google Scholar]
- 166. Jing Y, Lin R. Transcriptional regulatory network of the light signaling pathways. New Phytol. 2020;227:683–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Kulchin YN, Nakonechnaya OV, Gafitskaya IV. et al. Plant morphogenesis under different light intensity. Defect Diffus Forum. 2018;386:201–6 [Google Scholar]
- 168. Osnato M, Cota I, Nebhnani P. et al. Photoperiod control of plant growth: flowering time genes beyond flowering. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:805635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Yang XL, Xu H, Shao L. et al. Response of photosynthetic capacity of tomato leaves to different LED light wavelength. Environ Exp Bot. 2018;150:161–71 [Google Scholar]
- 170. Vermeulen PJ, Anten NPR, Schieving F. et al. Height convergence in response to neighbour growth: genotypic differences in the stoloniferous plant Potentilla reptans. New Phytol. 2008;177:688–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Liu Y, Jafari F, Wang H. Integration of light and hormone signaling pathways in the regulation of plant shade avoidance syndrome. aBIOTECH. 2021;2:131–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Martel AB, Taylor AE, Qaderi MM. Individual and interactive effects of temperature and light intensity on canola growth, physiological characteristics and methane emissions. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020;157:160–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Rondanini DP, del Pilar Vilariño, Roberts ME. et al. Physiological responses of spring rapeseed (Brassica napus) to red/far-red ratios and irradiance during pre- and post-flowering stages. Physiol Plant. 2014;152:784–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Su P, Wang D, Wang P. et al. In vitro regeneration, photomorphogenesis and light signaling gene expression in Hydrangea quercifolia cv. 'Harmony' under different LED environments. Planta. 2024;259:71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Sharma P, Chatterjee M, Burman N. et al. Cryptochrome 1 regulates growth and development in brassica through alteration in the expression of genes involved in light, phytohormone and stress signalling. Plant Cell Environ. 2014;37:961–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Folta KM. Green light stimulates early stem elongation, antagonizing light-mediated growth inhibition. Plant Physiol. 2004;135:1407–16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Zheng Z-L, Yang Z, Jang J-C. et al. Modification of plant architecture in chrysanthemum by ectopic expression of the tobacco phytochrome B1 gene. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2001;126:19–26 [Google Scholar]
- 178. Jeong SW, Park S, Jin JS. et al. Influences of four different light-emitting diode lights on flowering and polyphenol variations in the leaves of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium). J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:9793–800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Molla KA. A significant P value: how phosphorus controls plant height. Plant Cell. 2024;36:213–4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Alem P, Thomas PA, van Iersel MW. Controlled water deficit as an alternative to plant growth retardants for regulation of poinsettia stem elongation. HortScience. 2015;50:565–9 [Google Scholar]
- 181. Bayer A. Fertilizer rate and substrate water content effect on growth and flowering of beardtongue. Horticulturae. 2020;6:57 [Google Scholar]
- 182. Pimentel P, Almada RD, Salvatierra A. et al. Physiological and morphological responses of Prunus species with different degree of tolerance to long-term root hypoxia. Sci Hortic. 2014;180:14–23 [Google Scholar]
- 183. Nzokou P, Cregg B. Growth, Biomass, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Containerized Fraser Fir (Abies fraseri) as Related to Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilization. HortScience horts. 2010, 45: 946-951 [Google Scholar]
- 184. Li W, Wang Y., Xie Z Xie Z. et al. Effects of Different Irrigation Amount on Growth and Yield of Lanzhou Lily. North Hortic. 2020;11:54-63. [Google Scholar]
- 185. Caspersen S, Bergstrand K-J. Phosphorus restriction influences P efficiency and ornamental quality of poinsettia and chrysanthemum. Sci Hortic. 2020;267:109316 [Google Scholar]
- 186. Boldt JK, Altland JE. Petunia (petunia ×hybrida) cultivars vary in silicon accumulation and distribution. HortScience. 2021;56:305-+ [Google Scholar]
- 187. Jiang KF, Peng S, Yin ZM. et al. Effects of N, P, K nutrition levels on the growth, flowering attributes and functional components in Chrysanthemum morifolium. Horticulturae. 2024;10:226 [Google Scholar]
- 188. Kamenidou S, Cavins TJ, Marek S. Silicon supplements affect floricultural quality traits and elemental nutrient concentrations of greenhouse produced gerbera. Sci Hortic. 2010;123:390–4 [Google Scholar]
- 189. Lian X, Tan B, Yan L. et al. Transcript profiling provides insights into molecular processes during shoot elongation in temperature-sensitive peach (Prunus persica). Sci Rep. 2020;10:7801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Testone G, Condello E, Verde I. et al. The peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) genome harbours 10 KNOX genes, which are differentially expressed in stem development, and the class 1 KNOPE1 regulates elongation and lignification during primary growth. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:5417–35 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Zhang Q, Chen W, Sun L. et al. The genome of Prunus mume. Nat Commun. 2012;3:1318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Zhang X, Jiang Q, Shen Y. et al. Using landscape genomics to assess local adaptation of fruit trees to current and future climatic conditions. Fruit Res. 2024a;4:0 [Google Scholar]
- 193. Cheng B, Du W, Bourke PM. et al. Population genetics of horticultural crops aided by multi-omics technology and its implications for ornamental plants. Ornam Plant Res. 2024;4:0 [Google Scholar]
- 194. Zhang Q, Zhang H, Sun L. et al. The genetic architecture of floral traits in the woody plant Prunus mume. Nat Commun. 2018;9:1702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Zheng T, Li P, Zhuo X. et al. The chromosome-level genome provides insight into the molecular mechanism underlying the tortuous-branch phenotype of Prunus mume. New Phytol. 2022;235:141–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Feng Y, Sun Q, Zhang G. et al. Genome-wide identification and characterization of ABC transporters in nine Rosaceae species identifying MdABCG28 as a possible cytokinin transporter linked to dwarfing. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:5783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Ge Y, Lai Q, Luo P. et al. Transcriptome profiling of Gerbera hybrida reveals that stem bending is caused by water stress and regulation of abscisic acid. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Yadav LK, Wilde HD. Identification and bioinformatic characterization of rare variants of Rhododendron canescens architecture genes. Euphytica. 2022;218:66 [Google Scholar]
- 199. Chen S, Zhang Y, Zhang T. et al. Comparative transcriptomic, anatomical and phytohormone analyses provide new insights into hormone-mediated tetraploid dwarfing in hybrid sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua x L. formosana). Front Plant Sci. 2022;13:924044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. Qin S, Fu S, Yang Y. et al. Comparative microscopic, transcriptome and IAA content analyses reveal the stem growth variations in two cultivars Ilex verticillata. Plants (Basel). 2023;12:1941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Ju Y, Feng L, Wu J. et al. Transcriptome analysis of the genes regulating phytohormone and cellular patterning in lagerstroemia plant architecture. Sci Rep. 2018;8:15162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Yu C, Hou K, Zhang H. et al. Integrated mass spectrometry imaging and single-cell transcriptome atlas strategies provide novel insights into taxoid biosynthesis and transport in Taxus mairei stems. Plant J. 2023a;115:1243–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Li J, Sheng Y, Xu H. et al. Transcriptome and hormone metabolome reveal the mechanism of stem bending in water lily (Nymphaea tetragona) cut-flowers. Front Plant Sci. 2023;14:1195389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Nobori T, Oliva M, Lister R. et al. Multiplexed single-cell 3D spatial gene expression analysis in plant tissue using PHYTOMap. Nat Plants. 2023;9:1026–33 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Tung CC, Kuo SC, Yang CL. et al. Single-cell transcriptomics unveils xylem cell development and evolution. Genome Biol. 2023;24:3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Zhuo X, Zheng T, Li S. et al. Identification of the PmWEEP locus controlling weeping traits in Prunus mume through an integrated genome-wide association study and quantitative trait locus mapping. Hortic Res. 2021;8:131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Hollender CA, Pascal T, Tabb A. et al. Loss of a highly conserved sterile alpha motif domain gene (WEEP) results in pendulous branch growth in peach trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E4690–9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Kohler AR, Scheil A, Hill JL Jr. et al. Defying gravity: WEEP promotes negative gravitropism in peach trees by establishing asymmetric auxin gradients. Plant Physiol. 2024;195:1229–55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Khodakovskaya M, Vankova R, Malbeck J. et al. Enhancement of flowering and branching phenotype in chrysanthemum by expression of ipt under the control of a 0.821 kb fragment of the LEACO1 gene promoter. Plant Cell Rep. 2009;28:1351–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Yin J, Chang X, Kasuga T. et al. A basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, PhFBH4, regulates flower senescence by modulating ethylene biosynthesis pathway in petunia. Hortic Res. 2015;2:15059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Xie Q, Chen G, Chen X. et al. Jointly silencing BoDWARF, BoGA20ox and BoSP (SELF-PRUNING) produces a novel miniature ornamental Brassica oleracea var. acephala f. tricolor variety. Mol Breed. 2014;34:99–113 [Google Scholar]
- 212. Liang YC, Reid MS, Jiang CZ. Controlling plant architecture by manipulation of gibberellic acid signalling in petunia. Hortic Res. 2014;1:14061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Tang Y, Lu L, Sheng Z. et al. An R2R3-MYB network modulates stem strength by regulating lignin biosynthesis and secondary cell wall thickening in herbaceous peony. Plant J. 2023c;113:1237–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Zhao W, Ding L, Liu J. et al. Regulation of lignin biosynthesis by an atypical bHLH protein CmHLB in chrysanthemum. J Exp Bot. 2022b;73:2403–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Gargul JM, Mibus H, Serek M. Manipulation of MKS1 gene expression affects Kalanchoe blossfeldiana and Petunia hybrida phenotypes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13:51–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Nakagawa H, Jiang CJ, Sakakibara H. et al. Overexpression of a petunia zinc-finger gene alters cytokinin metabolism and plant forms. Plant J. 2005;41:512–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Snowden KC, Simkin AJ, Janssen BJ. et al. The decreased apical dominance1/Petunia hybrida CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE8 gene affects branch production and plays a role in leaf senescence, root growth, and flower development. Plant Cell. 2005;17:746–59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Yamagishi M, Nomizu T, Nakatsuka T. Overexpression of lily MicroRNA156-resistant SPL13A stimulates stem elongation and flowering in Lilium formosanum under non-inductive (non-chilling) conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1456183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Zheng R, Peng Y, Chen J. et al. The genome-level survey of the WOX gene family in Melastoma dodecandrum Lour. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24:17349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220. Tang Y, Lu L, Huang X. et al. The herbaceous peony transcription factor WRKY41a promotes secondary cell wall thickening to enhance stem strength. Plant Physiol. 2023b;191:428–45 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221. Suh E-J, Hong J, k., Lee, Y.-H., Kim, D. C. Overexpression of the Brassica rapa SRS7 gene in pot-type chrysanthemum [Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat] reduces plant height. Sci Hortic. 2020;273:109634 [Google Scholar]
- 222. Suh E-J, Kim DC, Park SR. et al. Development of a compact garden mum variety through introduction of the BrSRS7 gene. Sci Hortic. 2023;309:111589 [Google Scholar]
- 223. Lütken H, Jensen LS, Topp SH. et al. Production of compact plants by overexpression of AtSHI in the ornamental Kalanchoë. Plant Biotechnol J. 2010;8:211–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224. Duan H, Wu B, Qin H. et al. Harnessing agrobacterium rhizogenes and mobile elements for innovative transgene-free gene editing in woody plants. Ornam Plant Res. 2025;5:e027 [Google Scholar]
- 225. Shvets DY, Berezhneva ZA, Musin KG. et al. Rol genes of agrobacteria: possible biological functions. Biol Bull Rev. 2023;13:S359–76 [Google Scholar]
- 226. Casanova E, Trillas MI, Moysset L. et al. Influence of rol genes in floriculture. Biotechnol Adv. 2005;23:3–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227. Pellegrineschi A, Damon J-P, Valtorta N. et al. Improvement of ornamental characters and fragrance production in lemon-scented geranium through genetic transformation by agrobacterium rhizogenes. Bio/Technology. 1994;12:64–8 [Google Scholar]
- 228. Christensen B, Sriskandarajah S, Serek M. et al. Transformation of Kalanchoe blossfeldiana with rol-genes is useful in molecular breeding towards compact growth. Plant Cell Rep. 2008;27:1485–95 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229. Favero BT, Tan Y, Lin Y. et al. Transgenic Kalanchoe blossfeldiana, containing individual rol genes and open reading frames under 35S promoter, exhibit compact habit, reduced plant growth, and altered ethylene tolerance in flowers. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:672023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230. Cheng H, Zhang F, Ding Y. CRISPR/Cas9 delivery system engineering for genome editing in therapeutic applications. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231. Li Y, Li W, Li J. The CRISPR/Cas9 revolution continues: from base editing to prime editing in plant science. J Genet Genomics. 2021;48:661–70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232. Saini H, Thakur R, Gill R. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-gene editing approaches in plant breeding. GM Crops Food. 2023;14:1–17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233. Piovesan A, Vancauwenberghe V, Van De Looverbosch. et al. X-ray computed tomography for 3D plant imaging. Trends Plant Sci. 2021;26:1171–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234. Zhang Y, Wang J, Du J. et al. Dissecting the phenotypic components and genetic architecture of maize stem vascular bundles using high-throughput phenotypic analysis. Plant Biotechnol J. 2021c;19:35–50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235. Hu Z, Liu J, Shen S. et al. Large-volume fully automated cell reconstruction generates a cell atlas of plant tissues. Plant Cell. 2024b;36:4840–61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236. Bai B, Yang X, Li Y. et al. Deep learning-enabled virtual histological staining of biological samples. Light Sci Appl. 2023;12:57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 237. Latonen L, Koivukoski S, Khan U. et al. Virtual staining for histology by deep learning. Trends Biotechnol. 2024;42:1177–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238. Zhang B, Gao Y, Zhang L. et al. The plant cell wall: biosynthesis, construction, and functions. J Integr Plant Biol. 2021a;63:251–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239. Colares CJG, Pastore TCM, Coradin VTR. et al. Near infrared hyperspectral imaging and MCR-ALS applied for mapping chemical composition of the wood specie Swietenia Macrophylla king (mahogany) at microscopic level. Microchem J. 2016;124:356–63 [Google Scholar]
- 240. Li Y, Shen W, Zhang X. et al. Single-cell characterization of major components of plant cell walls in situ by Raman spectroscopy. Sci China Life Sci. 2024c;67:1772–4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241. Wallace JG, Rodgers-Melnick E, Buckler ES. On the road to breeding 4.0: unraveling the good, the bad, and the boring of crop quantitative genomics. Annu Rev Genet. 2018;52:421–44 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242. Yu H, Bai S, Li J. Towards breeding 5.0: smart variety by intelligent breeding. Chin Sci Bull. 2024;69:4687–90 [Google Scholar]
- 243. Tang J, Ye J, Liu P. et al. Ornamental plant gene editing: past, present and future. Ornam Plant Res. 2023a;3:1–6 [Google Scholar]
- 244. Din A, Wani MA, Jin C. et al. Post-genomic era of CRISPR/Cas technology in ornamental plants: advantages, limitations, and prospects. Ornam Plant Res. 2025;5:0 [Google Scholar]


