Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1974 Oct;14(10):759–790. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85948-5

Transient Response in a Dendritic Neuron Model for Current Injected at One Branch

John Rinzel, Wilfrid Rall
PMCID: PMC1334571  PMID: 4424185

Abstract

Mathematical expressions are obtained for the response function corresponding to an instantaneous pulse of current injected to a single dendritic branch in a branched dendritic neuron model. The theoretical model assumes passive membrane properties and the equivalent cylinder constraint on branch diameters. The response function when used in a convolution formula enables one to compute the voltage transient at any specified point in the dendritic tree for an arbitrary current injection at a given input location. A particular numerical example, for a brief current injection at a branch terminal, illustrates the attenuation and delay characteristics of the depolarization peak as it spreads throughout the neuron model. In contrast to the severe attenuation of voltage transients from branch input sites to the soma, the fraction of total input charge actually delivered to the soma and other trees is calculated to be about one-half. This fraction is independent of the input time course. Other numerical examples, which compare a branch terminal input site with a soma input site, demonstrate that, for a given transient current injection, the peak depolarization is not proportional to the input resistance at the injection site and, for a given synaptic conductance transient, the effective synaptic driving potential can be significantly reduced, resulting in less synaptic current flow and charge, for a branch input site. Also, for the synaptic case, the two inputs are compared on the basis of the excitatory post-synaptic potential (EPSP) seen at the soma and the total charge delivered to the soma.

Full text

PDF
759

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barnwell G. M., Cerimele B. J. A mathematical model of the effects of spatio-temporal patterns of dendritic input potentials on neuronal somatic potentials. Kybernetik. 1972 Mar;10(3):144–155. doi: 10.1007/BF00290513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barrett J. N., Crill W. E. Influence of dendritic location and membrane properties on the effectiveness of synapses on cat motoneurones. J Physiol. 1974 Jun;239(2):325–345. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Burke R. E. Composite nature of the monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potential. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1114–1137. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. FATT P., KATZ B. An analysis of the end-plate potential recorded with an intracellular electrode. J Physiol. 1951 Nov 28;115(3):320–370. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1951.sp004675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Iansek R., Redman S. J. The amplitude, time course and charge of unitary excitatory post-synaptic potentials evoked in spinal motoneurone dendrites. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):665–688. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jack J. J., Redman S. J. An electrical description of the motoneurone, and its application to the analysis of synaptic potentials. J Physiol. 1971 Jun;215(2):321–352. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1971.sp009473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. KATZ B., MILEDI R. A STUDY OF SPONTANEOUS MINIATURE POTENTIALS IN SPINAL MOTONEURONES. J Physiol. 1963 Sep;168:389–422. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1963.sp007199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. KATZ B., THESLEFF S. On the factors which determine the amplitude of the miniature end-plate potential. J Physiol. 1957 Jul 11;137(2):267–278. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1957.sp005811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. MacGregor R. J. A model for responses to activation by axodendritic synapses. Biophys J. 1968 Mar;8(3):305–318. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(68)86489-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. RALL W. Membrane potential transients and membrane time constant of motoneurons. Exp Neurol. 1960 Oct;2:503–532. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(60)90029-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. RALL W. Theory of physiological properties of dendrites. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1962 Mar 2;96:1071–1092. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1962.tb54120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rall W. Distinguishing theoretical synaptic potentials computed for different soma-dendritic distributions of synaptic input. J Neurophysiol. 1967 Sep;30(5):1138–1168. doi: 10.1152/jn.1967.30.5.1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rall W., Rinzel J. Branch input resistance and steady attenuation for input to one branch of a dendritic neuron model. Biophys J. 1973 Jul;13(7):648–687. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(73)86014-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rall W. Time constants and electrotonic length of membrane cylinders and neurons. Biophys J. 1969 Dec;9(12):1483–1508. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86467-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Redman S. J. The attenuation of passively propagating dendritic potentials in a motoneurone cable model. J Physiol. 1973 Nov;234(3):637–664. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1973.sp010365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES