Abstract
The increasing demand for sustainable alternatives to fossil-based resources has intensified interest in the integrated valorization of lignocellulosic biomass within the context of biorefinery and circular economy strategies. However, the relationship between biomass-derived platform molecules and biomass-derived carbonaceous materials remains insufficiently explored in the literature. This review discusses recent advances in the conversion of biomass into platform molecules, particularly furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), with emphasis on catalytic pathways and the role of homogeneous, heterogeneous, and biomass-derived catalysts in controlling process selectivity and efficiency. Representative studies reporting HMF yields above 90% and recyclable biomass-derived catalysts are highlighted to demonstrate the potential of sustainable catalytic approaches. In parallel, the synthesis of biomass-derived carbonaceous materials via pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization is discussed, together with surface functionalization strategies involving sulfonic, amino, and phosphate groups. These modifications enable the development of multifunctional materials for applications in catalysis, electrochemical systems, and adsorption processes. Furthermore, the review highlights the integrated role of biomass as both feedstock and catalyst precursor, reinforcing the concept of closed-loop biomass valorization. Finally, current challenges related to catalyst stability, process scalability, and sustainable industrial implementation are critically discussed.


1. Introduction
Global demand for energy and raw materials has increased significantly, intensifying the consumption of fossil resources and contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts. This scenario underscores the urgency of transitioning toward sustainable energy systems and greener chemical processes based on renewable resources. ,
Biomass has emerged as a promising alternative due to its abundance, renewability, and high carbon content, with the potential to replace fossil-based feedstocks in multiple industrial applications. , In particular, lignocellulosic biomass is attractive because of its wide availability and its noncompetition with food production, as it is mainly derived from agricultural, forestry, and industrial residues.
Building on this potential, biomass can be converted into strategic platform molecules such as furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), levulinic acid, and polyols, which serve as versatile intermediates for fuels, fuel additives, and sustainable polymers. , This approach aligns with the biorefinery concept, in which biomass fractions are transformed into value-added products through chemical, biological, or thermochemical routes.
Complementarily, biomass has also been widely explored as a precursor for functional carbonaceous materials, establishing a direct link between molecular valorization and materials design. Thermochemical processes such as pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization yield biochar and hydrochar, respectively, with tunable porosity and surface area. , Subsequent chemical activation further tailors their acid–base, electronic, and structural characteristics. ,
These biomass-derived materials have shown strong performance in catalytic processes for fuel production, hydrogen generation, and electrochemical energy storage. In addition, recent studies have demonstrated that such materials can be rationally engineered into advanced functional systems, including donor–acceptor conjugated architectures for photocatalytic applications. , These systems enable enhanced charge separation and tunable electronic properties, expanding their applicability in solar-to-chemical energy conversion. Their low cost, renewability, scalability, and tunable structural properties position them as key enablers in the transition toward sustainable energy systems.
Thus, this review goes beyond conventional approaches by integrating two strands often addressed separately: the production of energy-relevant platform molecules and the design of biomass-derived functional carbon materials. By explicitly linking molecular-level biomass conversion pathways to the development of advanced carbon systems, it provides a unified framework for biomass valorization.
This perspective is further reinforced by the discussion of practical applications, in which biomass-derived carbon materials are explored as catalysts, catalyst supports, and components in electrochemical systems and adsorption processes.
This integrated framework consolidates recent advances and identifies key challenges and design principles for next-generation materials, positioning biomass as a central pillar of scalable, low-carbon technologies aligned with green chemistry and the circular economy.
2. Biomass: Source, Structure, and Potential as Chemical Platform
Biomass is a valuable and promising renewable resource for producing fuels, chemicals, and sustainable materials. A variety of sources can be utilized, and they can be classified into categories such as agricultural residue (e.g., straw, husks, pruning waste, fruits peels), forestry biomass (e.g., wood, bark, sawdust), and byproducts from the timber and pulp and paper industries (e.g., lignin-rich residues).
The source of biomass plays a crucial role in determining its chemical composition and structural organization, which directly influence its suitability for catalytic and energy applications. Among these, lignocellulosic biomass stands out as the most abundant class, being primarily composed of cellulose (30–50 wt %), hemicellulose (20–40 wt %), and lignin (15–25 wt %) (Figure ).
1.
Main structural components of lignocellulosic biomass.
However, the relative proportions of these components vary significantly depending on the biomass source. Agricultural residues are typically richer in cellulose and hemicellulose, making them more amenable to conversion into chemical platforms. , In contrast, forestry biomass generally exhibits a higher lignin content, favoring the production of aromatic-rich carbon materials and functionalized biochars.
This compositional variability plays a decisive role in determining the physicochemical properties of derived materials, such as porosity, surface functionality, and thermal stability, which directly impact their performance in catalytic applications. Therefore, a clear classification and comparison of biomass sources are essential to rationally guide their valorization into functional carbon materials.
At the molecular level, cellulose is a linear polymer of glucose containing both crystalline and amorphous regions and represents the fraction most resistant to degradation. Its microfibrils are closely associated with hemicellulose, an amorphous polysaccharide composed mainly of pentoses and hexoses, which are more susceptible to hydrolysis. These polysaccharide fractions constitute the main precursors of sugars that, after catalytic dehydration, can be converted into high-value platform molecules such as furfural and HMF. ,
Lignin, which surrounds the hemicellulose-cellulose matrix, forms a three-dimensional aromatic network rich in C–C and C–O linkages and is largely responsible for the recalcitrance of lignocellulosic biomass. , This high aromatic carbon content also makes lignin and thermochemical residue suitable precursors for carbonaceous materials.
2.1. Integrated Biomass Valorization: Platform Molecules and Carbonaceous Materials
Among the strategies applied for the transformation of polysaccharides derived from lignocellulosic biomass, the production of furfural and HMF represents one of the most important pathways, as these molecules serve as key building blocks for the synthesis of a wide range of chemicals. Figure illustrates the formation of these two compounds from the hydrolysis of hemicellulose and cellulose.
2.
Conversion pathways for the formation of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) from lignocellulosic polysaccharides.
Biomass undergoes pretreatment to release cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin fractions, enabling their conversion into higher-value products. Hemicellulose and cellulose serve as key sources of platform molecules such as furfural and HMF. Their depolymerization typically proceeds via acid hydrolysis. To illustrate this process, the mechanism of furfural production over acid catalysts is shown in Figure . Upon acid-catalized cleavage of β-1,4-glycosidic bonds in hemicellulose and cellulose, H+ promotes the formation of C5 pentoses (e.g., xylose and arabinose) and C6 hexoses (e.g., glucose and fructose), respectively. Inorganic acids, such as H2SO4, are commonly employed as catalyst in the hydrolysis and dehydration steps involved in these transformations. ,
3.
Mechanism of furfural production with acid catalysts. (a) Hydrolysis of biomass to pentose (b) dehydration of pentose to furfural with (i) heterogeneous catalysis and (ii) heterogeneous catalysis. Source: adapted with permission from ref Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, CC BY.
Following biomass hydrolysis, pentoses undergo acid-catalyzed dehydration to form furfural. In homogeneous systems, pentose is initially isomerized into enediol intermediates under the action of Lewis acids, followed by successive dehydration steps leading to cyclization, and the formation of furaldehyde in the presence of Brønsted acids. In heterogeneous systems, the mechanism involves protonation of hydroxyl groups, followed by water elimination, carbocation formation, and structural rearrangements until final cyclization occurs, yielding furfural. Thus, the type of catalyst directly influences both the reaction mechanism and its efficiency.
High xylose conversion (82–96%) to furfural (28–38% yield) can also be achieved using more sustainable catalysts, such as biomass-derived carbon-supported solid acids; however, further optimization is still required to improve process selectivity. In sustainable systems, sulfonated activated carbon has promoted the dehydration of fructose with up to 100% yield of HMF, and after four reaction cycles, the yield remained as high as 94%. These studies highlights the versatility of biomass and its potential within the circular economy, as biomass-derived compounds are converted using catalysts that are themselves derived from biomass.
Other recent studies have reported several strategies to improve the yield of furfural and HMF from biomass by combining advances in catalytic systems, reaction media, and process design. Continuous-flow approaches have demonstrated particular relevance for process intensification and scalability. For instance, Megbenu et al. (2025), achieved furfural yields of approximately 74% from xylose, using a ZnCl2/NaCl catalytic system, although lower yields were observed for lignocellulosic residues such as corn cob and rice husk. Similarly, Ariyanti et al. (2025) reported furfural yields exceeding 93% from corn cob using AlCl3, highlighting the effectiveness of Lewis acid catalysis in real biomass feedstocks and its alignment with circular economy strategies.
In addition to catalytic design, the reaction medium and processing route play a critical role, as demonstrated by Rakhatkyzy et al. (2024) compared continuous-flow and microwave systems for HMF production using deep eutectic solvents, achieving significantly higher yields under continuous flow conditions. Collectively, these studies demonstrate that the interplay between catalyst selection, reaction environment, and process configuration is essential for advancing efficient and scalable biomass valorization strategies.
In addition to catalytic conversion into platform molecules, biomass can also be valorized through carbonization routes. Depending on the methodology employed, acid (e.g., –SO3H) or basic (e.g., –NH2) functional groups can be introduced onto the carbon surface, and metallic particles may be incorporated to form hybrid materials with tailored catalytic properties. Furthermore, carbonized biomass can serve as an efficient catalytic support, thereby expanding its applicability in sustainable chemical processes.
In this context, the following sections discuss strategies for the catalytic conversion of furfural and HMF, as well as the synthesis and functionalization of biomass-derived carbonaceous materials.
2.2. Furfural
Furfural is one of the main platform molecules derived from lignocellulosic biomass, and the demand for this feedstock has increased significantly in recent years. Its production from agricultural residues, such as bagasse and straw reinforces its role within the context of sustainable biorefineries.
Owing to the presence of reactive functional groups (a furan ring and an aldehyde group), furfural is a highly versatile molecule and can be catalytically converted into a wide range of industrially relevant products, as illustrated in Figure .
4.
Representative products obtained from the catalytic conversion of furfural.
Furan can be obtained from the decarboxylation of furfural and subsequently hydrogenated to produce tetrahydrofuran (THF), which can be used as a solvent or as a precursor in polymer production. Studies have reported high yields (up to 88%) of furan from furfural decarboxylation when catalyzed by Ni/Mg-based solid catalysts. The subsequent hydrogenation of furan to THF is commonly catalyzed by Pd- or Pt-based catalysts.
The hydrogenation of furfural leads to the formation of furfuryl alcohol, which can undergo hydrodeoxygenation to produce 2-methylfuran, a molecule that can participate in hydroxyalkylation–alkylation reactions to generate sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs). Subsequent hydrogenation of 2-methylfuran yields 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MTHF), which is considered a versatile and green solvent, as well as a potential alternative to conventional petroleum-based solvents.
The hydrogenation of furfuryl alcohol can also lead to the formation of tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA), which can subsequently undergo dehydratation to produce 2-MTHF. THFA is an important intermediate in the synthesis of various polymers with industrial applications.
When furfuryl alcohol undergoes alcoholysis, alkyl levulinates such as ethyl levulinate are formed, which are widely applied as biofuel additives. Levulinic acid can also be obtained from the conversion of furfuryl alcohol and serves as an important intermediate for the synthesis of levulinates. , Furfuryl alcohol is therefore an important industrial intermediate and serves as a key starting material for the synthesis of fine chemical intermediates, sustainable materials and polymers, solvent, bioadditives, and biofuels. ,
γ-Valerolactone (GVL) is an important compound in the formulation of liquid fuels, as it improves octane rating and combustion efficiency and reduces NOx emissions when blended with fuels. It has also been reported as promising oxygenated fuel additive compared to conventional fossil-derived compounds, owing to its favorable physicochemical properties and cleaner combustion profile. In addition, GVL serves as a precursor for fine chemical, including polymers.
GVL can be synthesized from furfural in one-pot systems involving multiple catalytic steps, in which Lewis and Brønsted acid sites act synergistically. For example, catalysts based on zirconium-containing metal–organic framework (MOF), with surface areas in the range of 467–528 m2 g–1, and acidity of 0.44–0.85 mmol g–1, promoting high conversions of furfural (>99%) with selectivity up to 83% in GVL (8 h, 160 °C, 0.01 g catalyst). Alternatively, GVL can be produced via the hydrogenation and cyclization of ethyl levulinate (with yields up to 88% over Co-based catalysts), while subsequent ring-opening and hydrogenation yield 1,4-pentanediol with up to 98% yield.
Among the various transformation pathways of furfural, the formation of furfuryl alcohol, tetrahydrofurfuryl alcohol (THFA), 1,5-pentanediol, 1,4-pentanediol, 2-methylfuran, and GVL is commonly promoted by metal-containing catalysts. On the other hand, the oxidation of furfural can generate a series of value-added compounds, such as 2-furoic acid, an important product for the pharmaceutical and optical industries. Carbon-supported Ru catalysts have achieved yields of up to 83% of furoic acid.
Oxidative processes can also lead to the formation of succinic acid, 2(5H)-furanone, and maleic anhydride. − Among these products, succinic acid and its derivatives stand out due to their wide range of applications in pharmaceuticals, adhesives, solvents, polymer synthesis, and food additives.
Although a variety of catalytic routes have been developed for the conversion of furfural, significant challenges remain in achieving highly selective chemical transformations. These limitations arise primarily from competing side reactions, including condensation and polymerization pathways that lead to the formation of humins. Humins are insoluble oligomeric carbon structures formed via acid-catalyzed reactions of reactive intermediates (e.g., furfural and HMF), involving C–C and C–O bond formation and polymer growth. −
In parallel, these species may evolve into carbonaceous deposits (coke), especially over strong Brønsted acid sites, causing pore blocking and active site coverage. These processes promote catalyst deactivation, decreasing activity and selectivity. Mitigation strategies include tuning catalyst acidity and porosity, as well as applying regeneration treatments such as solvent washing or thermal calcination. However, these approaches often involve trade-offs between catalytic activity, stability, and process complexity, necessitating the development of more robust catalyst designs.
2.3. 5-Hidroxymethylfurfural
HMF is primarily obtained from the dehydration of hexoses, such as glucose and fructose, in contrast to furfural, which is produced through the dehydration of pentoses. In addition, the presence of three reactive sites in the HMF molecule (the furan ring, as well as the aldehyde and hydroxymethyl groups) enables a variety of catalytic transformations, including oxidation, hydrogenation, hydrogenolysis, etherification, and acetalization. The resulting furanic derivatives exhibit important industrial and energy-related applications and are illustrated in Figure .
5.

Furanic compounds derived from HMF.
HMF is considered one of the most important biobased monomers for replacing petrochemical diacids, such as terephthalic acid, in the production of renewable polyester. , In the energy context, the hydrogenolysis of HMF to 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF)a liquid fuel with high energy density and properties similar to those of gasolinemakes it a promising biofuel. High yields and selectivities (>97%) have being reported using Ru–Co/activated carbon (AC) (1.5 h, 200 °C, 1 MPa), while selectivity up to 99% has been achieved using Pd-MOF (3 h, 100 °C, 1 MPa).
In addition to hydrogenation routes, HMF can also be converted into furanic ethers, such as alkoxymethylfurans (AMFs) and 2,5-bis(alkoxymethyl)furans (BAMFs) with selectivity above 85%. These transformations typically involve sequential steps, including metal-catalyzed hydrogenation (ZnO–Fe3O4/AC, 10 h, 65 °C), followed by etherification promoted by Brønsted acidic solids. Catalysts such as protonated zeolites and Amberlyst-type resins enable high selectivities (63–95%) and conversions (∼60%) in the synthesis of ethoxymethylfurfural (EMF), a compound characterized by high energy density and improved combustion performance.
In continuous-flow systems, the acid-catalyzed self-etherification of HMF (conversion up to 90%) enables the formation of products such as 5,5′-[oxybis(methylene)]bis-2-furfural (OBMF, selectivity 84%), along with byproducts such as 5-(methoxymethyl)furfural (MMF, selectivity 16%), under the defined reaction conditions (60 °C, flow rate 0.3 mL min–1, residence time 17 min). Additionally, heteropolyacids have proven effective in promoting these transformations (89% of HMF conversion and 73% selectivity toward 5BMF), allowing structural modulation of the resulting ethers through variation of the alcohol chain employed.
Other relevant routes include the selective hydrogenation of the aldehyde group of HMF, leading to the formation of 2,5-bis(hydroxymethyl)furan (BHMF) and related intermediates, which are important precursors for renewable resins and polymers. In addition, the formation of HMF acetals has attracted attention, as these compounds can serve as oxygenated fuel additives capable of improving combustion efficiency and reducing pollutant emissions.
From a mechanistic perspective, selectivity toward desired products strongly depends on the catalytic system employed. In bifunctional catalytic systems for the conversion of biomass-derived oxygenates, metallic sites are typically responsible for hydrogen activation and hydrogenation steps, whereas acidic sites activate C–O bonds and promote transformations required for selective hydrodeoxygenation. Due to the presence of multiple reactive sites, HMF often exhibits limited selectivity toward a single product.
Therefore, improving catalytic processes for the selective transformation of HMF, as well as furfural, remains one of the major challenges in biomass valorization.
2.4. Functionalization of Carbonaceous Materials
Various modifications can be applied to biomass-derived carbonaceous materials to tailor their structural, chemical, and surface properties, thereby expanding their applicability in catalysis, adsorption processes, and energy-related applications. ,, Among the main modification strategies, sulfonation, amination, phosphorylation, and the formation of composite materials stand out. However, despite their functional advantages, these approaches present inherent limitations related to stability and scalability that must be critically evaluated.
Among the different functionalization approaches, sulfonation has been particularly widely explored due to its ability to introduce strong Brønsted acidity through the incorporation of –SO3H groups. This treatment results in materials widely applied in acid-catalyzed reactions, such as alcoholysis and acetalization, which are important processes for the production of bioadditives. For instance, sulfonated biochar derived from coffee residues has shown high yields in the formation of ethyl levulinate, while maintaining catalytic activity for up to seven reuse cycles without significant loss of performance. Similarly, sulfonated catalysts derived from date seeds have promoted high conversion of free fatty acids into biodiesel. Despite these advantages, sulfonated materials often exhibit limited stability and potential leaching of sulfonic groups, especially under aqueous or high-temperature conditions, which can lead to catalyst deactivation. Furthermore, the use of concentrated sulfuric acid, one of the most widely used sulfonating agents, raises concerns regarding process safety, corrosivity, and environmental burden, particularly at larger scales.
In addition to their catalytic applications, sulfonated carbons also exhibit high performance as adsorbents. For example, they display a notable capacity for removing potentially toxic metal pollutants, such as Pb(II) and Cd(II), as well as organic dyes like methylene blue. , Similarly, sulfonated biochar is more effective for ammonium removal than its nonsulfonated counterpart. However, their performance can be influenced by solution pH, ionic strength, and temperature, as well as competitive adsorption effects, which may limit applicability in complex real wastewater matrices.
Another relevant functionalization strategy is the amination of carbonaceous materials, particularly for adsorption purposes. The incorporation of nitrogen-containing groups enhances interactions with anionic pollutants through electrostatic attraction and complexation mechanisms. For example, amine-functionalized biochar obtained from watermelon rind exhibited high efficiency (98%) in the removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous systems. Likewise, biochar derived from Pergularia tomentosa, modified with 5% poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), showed high adsorption capacities for Acid Blue 25 (248 mg g–1) and Acid Red 18 (202 mg g–1). This performance is attributed not only to the presence of nitrogen functionalities but also to combined mechanisms such as pore filling, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and surface adsorption.
Phosphorylation has also been explored as a method for the surface modification of carbonaceous materials, potentially conferring both adsorptive and catalytic properties. While some studies report enhanced performance, such as improved U(VI) removal using phosphate-functionalized biochar, others indicate that modification does not always result in superior adsorption capacity compared to the pristine material. This suggests that the effectiveness of phosphorylation dependent on surface chemistry, precursor selection, and functional group accessibility. Moreover, phosphate leaching under certain conditions may pose environmental risks, particularly in aquatic systems where phosphorus release can contribute to eutrophication.
In addition to direct chemical modifications, the formation of composite materials represents an important strategy for enhancing the functionality of biochar. One example is a biochar-based composite containing cobalt phosphide, whose synthesis is relatively simple and which exhibits good performance in the degradation of sulfonamide antibiotics. Composite materials often benefit from synergistic effects, including improved electron transfer, higher dispersion of active sites, and enhanced structural stability.
These composites also find applications in agricultural systems. For example, the combination of biochar with carboxymethyl cellulose can form a coating for phosphate fertilizers, enabling controlled phosphorus release in soil and thereby improving nutrient uptake efficiency by plants. Similarly, biochar-based organophosphate fertilizers can promote phosphorus availability in soil. These applications offer potential benefits in nutrient management and soil conditioning, but their long-term environmental impacts still needs to be better understood, for example, in relation to soil accumulation.
3. Applications of Carbonaceous Materials Derived from Biomass
Biomass-derived carbons have played an increasingly important role in the development of sustainable solutions, with applications spanning several key areas in both academic research and industry. Some of the main applications of these materials are illustrated in Figure .
6.

Representative applications of biomass-derived char.
3.1. Catalysis
Biomass and biomass-derived residues have emerged as excellent precursors for the production of heterogeneous catalysts, serving both as catalyst supports and as precursors for active phases and as supports for metal species. In recent years, the development of biomass-derived catalysts has increased significantly, driven by their low cost and reduced environmental impact, which are consistent with the principles of green chemistry and the circular economy. Furthermore, these catalysts support a wide range of industrial processes, from the synthesis of fine chemicals to large-scale commodity production, thereby promoting innovation, sustainability, and efficiency. ,
The production of carbonaceous materials from biomass generally begins with a carbonization process, with pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) being the most commonly employed methods, producing biochar and hydrochar, respectively. , Figure summarizes these two processes.
7.
Conversion pathways from biomass to bio/hydrochar.
Pyrolysis is typically carried out at higher temperatures (200–900 °C) under an atmosphere containing little or no oxygen, , whereas HTC is performed in an aqueous medium at temperatures up to approximately 240 °C, eliminating the need for prior drying of the precursor. ,− During these processes, reactions such as dehydration, condensation, polymerization, and aromatization promote the formation of amorphous and porous carbonaceous structures. In addition, increasing pyrolysis temperature intensifies aromatization and graphitization reactions, leading to the development of graphite-like domains and defective carbon structures, whereas HTC-derived materials generally exhibit predominantly amorphous carbon characteristics.
HTC-derived carbons generally exhibit low porosity, therefore, chemical activation steps using H3PO4 or KOH are often employed to increase the surface area and promote a more uniform pore size distribution. , Moreover, the textural properties of hydrochars are strongly dependent on carbonization conditions, since prolonged reaction times and higher temperatures may induce structure densification and pore collapse, reducing surface area and pore volume. One-pot sulfonation, or sulfonation performed after carbonization, introduces –SO3H groups covalently bonded to the carbonaceous matrix, imparting strong Brønsted acidity and high catalytic efficiency. ,,
The acidity of biomass-derived sulfonated carbons primarily arises from the presence of –SO3H, –COOH, and phenolic –OH groups, exhibiting acidity comparable to that of sulfonic acid resins such as Amberlyst 15. In addition, these solid acid catalysts have the potential to replace conventional homogeneous acid catalysts, such as H2SO4, HCl, HNO3 and H3PO4, which are associated with drawbacks including corrosiveness, difficult separation from the reaction medium, and the need for post-treatment of acidic waste streams.
The applicability of these heterogeneous catalysts has been widely demonstrated in esterification, transesterification, and acetalization reactions. Sulfonated carbons derived from agricultural residues have shown high yields in the production of biodiesel and oxygenated derivatives, along with good stability and reusability. ,− These catalytic platforms are particularly relevant for the upgrading of biomass-derived platform molecules such as furfural and HMF due to their tunable acidity, porous structure, and potential for sustainable catalytic applications.
In addition to carbonaceous materials, mineral-rich residues such as shells, eggshells, ashes, and sludges have been employed as precursors for metal oxides, particularly CaO, MgO, and other mixed oxides. Biomass can also serve as a source of mixed oxides, being used either directly as a catalyst or as support/precursor for metal impregnation. , These materials are predominantly synthesized via calcination (300–1000 °C), following washing, drying, and grinding steps. , Due to their high CaCO3 content, eggshells and other calcareous residues represent promising sources of catalytic CaO, which has been successfully applied in biodiesel production from waste oils. ,,
Biomass can also act as a support for metal impregnation, enhancing structural stability and reducing the leaching of active species. Composites derived from coal ash or sugar cane bagasse impregnated with metal oxides have demonstrated high performance and satisfactory reusability in transesterification reactions. ,
Overall, the catalytic utilization of biomass integrates waste valorization, cost reduction, and mitigation of environmental impacts, thereby contributing strategically to the development of more sustainable chemical processes.
3.2. Supports for Catalysts
Carbonaceous materials derived from biomass stand out due to their versatility and, when used as supports, are capable of immobilizing catalytically active species, such as metals. This enables the transformation of homogeneous systems into heterogeneous ones, simplifying separation, recovery, and reuse steps, while also enhancing stability and selectivity in a variety of chemical processes.
Carbons obtained from renewable resources have emerged as efficient supports, promoting the immobilization of various catalytic species, as well as improved reaction rates, selectivity, stability, and functionality across diverse reaction systems. Table summarizes applications employing carbonaceous matrices from different sources as supports for metals in important chemical processes.
1. Biochar as a Catalyst Support in Sustainable Catalytic Processes .
| char feedstock | active supported material | surface area catalyst | applications | performance | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| neem leaves | Cu-nanoparticles/MFe2O4 | 11.2–29.3 m2 g–1 | formation of carbon-nitrogen bonds | 40–85% conversion | |
| pruning waste | CuO | - | degradation of 4-nitrophenol | 100% degradation | |
| olive stone | Cu/Ni | - | degradation of methyl orange | 75% yield | |
| straw | FeCo-MOF | 91.821 m2 g–1 | degradation of tetracycline | 97.7% efficiency | |
| oak sawdust | Bi2WO6 | 27.91 m2 g–1 | photodegradation of chlorpyrifos | 99.9% efficiency | |
| rice husk | Fe/Ni | 295.14 m2 g–1 | toluene removal | 92.76% efficiency | |
| pine sawdust | Ni/Fe | 330 m2 g–1 | syngas production and tar removal | increased synthesis gas yield by > 82% | |
| wheat straw | Ni | 87 m2 g–1 | CO2 methanation | up to approximately 65% conversion and selectivity | |
| vineyard pruning residue | Co | 116.1 m2 g–1 | hydrogenation furfural | 80% conversion; 70% selectivity | |
| olive stone | Ni | 1073.1 m2 g–1 | CO2 methanation | 72.5% conversion; 95.46% selectivity | |
| Cumaru sawdust | CaO | 777.7 m2 g–1 | biodiesel synthesis | 98% yield | |
| tanin | Co/Ni | 541 m2 g–1 | hidrogen evolution | hydrogen generation rate 6091.51 mL min–1 g–1 | |
| rice husk | Pd | 2635 m2 g-1 | benzaldehyde hydrogenation | 100% conversion; 81% yield | |
| coconut shell SiO2 | Cu/Zn | 1376–1420 m2 g–1, 250 m2 g–1 | CO2 hydrogenation | <10%, <5% |
Material supported on CeO2-doped activated biochar.
Materials supported on nitrogen-doped biochar.
Yield.
Magnetic composites (Cu@KF-C/MFe2O4) based on activated carbon modified with metal nanoparticles (M = Cu, Co, Cu, Ni and Zn) have attracted considerable attention due to their catalytic efficiency in C–N coupling reactions, ease of magnetic separation, excellent stability, and reusability. The performance of these systems depends on the dispersion of the metallic phase and the physicochemical properties of the carbon support. For example, in a series of Cu-based magnetic composites, variations in BET surface area (11.2–35.4 m2 g–1) and pore volume was directly correlated with catalytic performance, with the CoFe2O4-containing material exhibiting superior activity due to its more developed porous structure. This suggests that, even in systems with relatively low surface areas, differences in pore architecture and accessibility can significantly influence catalytic efficiency.
In the environmental field, metals supported on carbonaceous matrices have been successfully applied in the degradation of aqueous pollutants, such as 4-nitrophenol, 4-aminophenol and methyl orange, as well as in the removal of tetracycline (>97%). While these systems generally exhibit high efficiencies, differences in reaction conditions (e.g., pH, oxidant presence, catalyst loading, time and temperature) make direct comparison of catalytic performances difficult. Additionally, these systems exhibit high efficiency in the removal of volatile organic compounds, such as toluene (>92%) and tar, , reinforcing their potential for environmental remediation. Nevertheless, catalyst deactivation due to surface fouling and pore blockage remains an important limitation that is often not systematically addressed.
Among studies investigating the incorporation of metals into carbonaceous matrices, those employing doped biochar have demonstrated superior performance. For instance, carbonaceous matrices doped with cerium oxide and nitrogen, showed enhanced performance compared to their nondoped counterparts. This improvement is generally attributed to changes in electronic structure, surface functionality, and metal dispersion. However, the extent of these effects depends on the nature and level of doping.
In the energy context, metals supported on various biochars exhibit remarkable performance in the production of high-value fuels, such as CH4, biodiesel, and H2. Biochar derived from wheat straw and olive pits has been used as a support for metals, showing efficiency in CH4 production from CO2. , Mesoporous carbons derived from tannins have been used to support Co/Ni nanoparticles for H2 generation from NaBH4, exhibiting high efficiency and excellent performance over six reuse cycles. Furthermore, bimetallic catalysts supported on biochar show high performance in syngas production with a high hydrogen fraction. As observed in Table , the wide range of surface areas and catalytic performance highlights that activity is governed not solely by porosity but also by pore structure, surface functionality, and support-metal interactions, which are strongly influenced by precursor selection and processing conditions.
Beyond the chemical transformations discussed above, metal-doped carbonaceous catalysts have also demonstrated outstanding performance in hydrogenation processes and electrocatalytic applications. ,, However, long-term stability, metal leaching, and regeneration efficiency remain critical issues that require investigation, particularly under industrially relevant conditions.
From this perspective, the valorization of plant, agricultural, and animal-derived residues as catalytic precursors contributes to cost reduction and mitigation of environmental impacts, aligning with the principles of the circular economy. Nevertheless, challenges related to feedstock variability, reproducibility, and scale-up must be addressed to fully realize their potential. Thus, the use of biomass as a catalyst support integrates technical performance, waste valorization, and economic feasibility, representing a sustainable approach for the development of low-impact chemical processes.
3.3. Electrochemistry
Functionalized carbonaceous materials represent a key pathway in the development of sustainable electrochemical systems, combining high performance with the principles of the circular economy. These materials can exhibit high surface area, tunable porosity, good hydrophilicity, heteroatom incorporation, and high electrical conductivity, which are essential properties for applications in batteries and supercapacitors. In addition, are particularly attractive due to their abundance, renewable origin, low cost, and morphological versatility, often displaying physicochemical properties comparable to or even superior to those of commercial carbons and conventional metals. −
A wide range of biomass sources have emerged as effective precursors for the production of carbons intended for electrochemical systems, including cotton, peanut shells, olive leaves, bamboo and algae, corn cobs, and kombucha. These materials exhibit suitable structural compositions for the formation of porous carbons with properties favorable for charge storage. Table summarizes the main characteristics of these biomass sources and the correlation between their properties and electrochemical performance after carbonization via pyrolysis.
2. Characteristics of Different Biomasses Used as Carbonaceous Precursors in Electrochemical Systems.
| char feedstock | surface area (m2 g–1) | activation | application | specific capacitance /specific capacity | current density (A g–1) | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cotton | - | - | batteries | 272 mAh g–1 | 0.05 | |
| peanut shell | 1401.45 | FeCl3/MgCl2 and CO2 | supercapacitors | 247.28 F g–1 | 1.0 | |
| olive leaves | 839.33 | - | batteries/supercapacitors | 331.0 and 265.37 mAh g–1 /169.6 F g–1 | 0.5 | |
| bamboo and seaweed | 1285.15 | CH3COOK | supercapacitors | 320.4 F g–1 | 0.5 | |
| corn cob | 1612.86 | KMnO4 | supercapacitors | 691.05 F g–1 | 0.5 | |
| kombucha | 917.00 | KOH | supercapacitors | 326 F g–1 | 1.0 |
Several studies have demonstrated the potential of these precursors for applications in energy storage devices. Cotton textile waste has been converted into hard carbon for sodium-ion battery anodes, delivering a specific capacity of 272 mAh g–1 at 50 mA g–1 and retaining 98% of its capacity after 100 cycles. Similarly, activated carbons derived from peanut shells exhibited high surface area and a specific capacitance of 247 F g–1, along with good cycling stability in supercapacitors. The activation with ZnCl2 and FeCl3 favors the formation of micropores, whereas the presence of MgCl2 promotes the generation of mesopores. Carbons derived from olive leaves have also demonstrated excellent performance across different devices, exhibiting capacities of 331 mAh g–1 in lithium-ion batteries and 265 mAh g–1 in sodium-ion batteries, as well as a capacitance of 169.6 F g–1 in supercapacitors.
Other studies have explored activation and doping strategies to improve the electrochemical performance of these materials. The combination of bamboo with spirulina enabled the production of porous carbons doped with N, O, and S, achieving a specific capacitance of 320.4 F g–1 and high cycling stability. Carbon materials derived from corn cobs and activated with KMnO4 exhibited a surface area of 1612.89 m2 g–1 and a capacitance of 691.05 F g–1, demonstrating excellent performance in supercapacitors. Likewise, hierarchical carbons obtained from kombucha activated with KOH displayed a capacitance of 326 F g–1 and excellent cycling stability, highlighting the potential of this biomass as a precursor for energy storage devices.
In general, the electrochemical performance of the aforementioned materials is strongly related to surface area and pore size distribution. Direct carbonization of biomass, although capable of producing carbonaceous materials, often does not generate sufficiently developed porous structures for electrochemical applications. Therefore, control of the microstructure, including pore shape, size, and connectivity, is essential for optimizing ion adsorption and charge transport. , Accordingly, activation processes are widely employed to enhance surface area and develop hierarchical porous networks. Activation can be classified as chemical, physical, or physicochemical. ,
Chemical activation is the most widely used method due to its high efficiency in generating highly porous structures. In this process, activating agents such as KOH, metal chlorides (FeCl3/ZnCl2, FeCl3/MgCl2, and ZnCl2/MgCl2), CH3COOK, KMnO4, K2FeO4, (NH4)2HPO4, and K2CO3 are impregnated into the precursor and subjected to carbonization under an inert atmosphere. ,− During heating, dehydration, partial oxidation, and internal etching reactions occur within the carbon matrix, resulting in pore formation and expansion. After thermal treatment, the materials are washed to remove residual activating agents and neutralize the pH. ,
Physical activation is based on the use of oxidizing gases such as carbon dioxide, steam, air, or gas mixtures at high temperatures to promote controlled oxidation of the carbon matrix, thereby opening and widening existing pores. Although considered an environmentally friendly approach due to the absence of chemical washing steps, this method generally requires higher temperatures (350–1000 °C) and yields lower surface areas compared to chemical activation. ,
Physicochemical activation combines both strategies, typically involving an initial chemical activation step followed by treatment with oxidizing gases. This strategy enables finer control over the porous architecture, favoring the production of hierarchical carbons with superior properties for electrochemical applications, although it involves greater operational complexity.
In summary, the activation process is crucial not only for increasing surface area but also for generating an interconnected pore network that governs ion diffusion and charge storage. The balance between micropores (ion storage) and mesopores (rapid ion transport) is essential to maximize capacitance and cycling stability in supercapacitors and batteries. ,
Building on these considerations, the structural features that govern electrochemical performance, such as high surface area, hierarchical porosity, and surface functionalization, also underpin the effectiveness of biomass-derived carbons in environmental applications. In particular, the balance between micropores and mesopores, which is critical for ion storage and transport, also influences adsorption capacity and pollutants mass transfer. Thus, the same characteristics that enhance charge storage and catalytic behavior can be extended to the adsorption and removal of contaminants from water and air, highlighting the versatility of these materials across energy and environmental domains.
3.4. Adsorbents
Biomass-derived materials have also emerged as promising adsorbents, particularly for the removal of environmental pollutants such as heavy metals and dyes from wastewater, which are often difficult to remove using conventional treatment methods. The removal of these contaminants is essential for environmental protection and human health. ,
Various methods have been employed for the removal of organic pollutants and dyes, including coagulation, biological treatment, membrane separation, advanced oxidation processes, and adsorption. ,, However, these approaches often present significant limitations, such as high operational costs, long treatment times, and the generation of secondary waste. , In this context, adsorption stands out as an efficient alternative due to its simplicity, low operational cost, and high removal efficiency, as well as its possibility of adsorbent regeneration. ,,
Despite the wide range of commercially available adsorbents, their regeneration process can be costly. Accordingly, biomass-derived adsorbents have attracted increasing attention due to their renewability, low cost, and tunable surface properties. ,, Chemical modification of these materials with metals or nanomaterials can improve properties such as surface area, chemical functionality, active sites, and pore size distribution, thereby improving their adsorption performance.
Among these materials, carbonaceous adsorbents stand out in wastewater purification due to their high porosity and the presence of surface functional groups, such as phenolic, carboxyl, and carbonyl groups, which can interact with pollutants through chemical and physical adsorption mechanisms. Activated carbon, in particular, is widely recognized for its high surface area, well-developed porous structure, and good reusability. ,
As summarized in Table , biomass-derived adsorbents exhibits a wide range of surface area and adsorption capacities, reflecting the strong influence of precursor type and activation method on material properties. For instance, ultramicroporous activated carbons derived from lignocellulosic residues show high CO2 adsorption capacities, which are closely related to their pore size distribution rather than surface area alone. ,, In contrast, metal-modified adsorbents have demonstrated enhanced performance in dye removal, highlighting the role of surface functionalization and specific interactions between the adsorbent and the pollutant. ,
3. Biomass-Derived Adsorbents for Contaminants and Gas Removal.
| char feedstock | material adsorbent | surface area | application | performance | relevant observations | ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| green pods Cassia fistula | metallic nanoparticles (Fe, Ni, Cu) | 18.33–62.36 m2 g–1 | malachite green | 662 mg g–1 (Fe); 458 mg g–1 (Ni); 1355 mg g–1 (Cu); 456 mg g–1 (no metal) | up to 20× greater than commercial adsorbents | |
| Coccinia grandis | bionanocomposite modified with Cu | 15.2 m2 g–1 | malachite green | 99% removal; 49 mg g–1 | superior to commercial activated carbon | |
| rice rusk | N-doped mesoporous AC | 1226 m2 g–1 | CO2 adsorption | 5.43 mmol g–1 | stable regeneration after 12 cycles | |
| slash pine (wood) | ultramicroporous activated carbon | 906–1384 m2 g–1 | CO2 adsorption | 4.22–5.44 mmol m–2 | high microporosity and performance | |
| date sheets | ultramicroporous activated carbon | 2112–3337 m2 g–1 | CO2 adsorption | up to 22 mmol g–1 | surface specific area up to 3337 m2 g–1; adsorption dependent on pore size/area; reusability over 4 cycles | |
| Si-modified AC (Si/AC) | AC: 1698 m2 g–1 Si/AC–0.1: 1495 m2 g–1 | toluene | AC: 99 mg g–1; Si/AC–0.1: 130 mg g–1; ∼80% efficiency after 5 cycles | greater microporosity; high temperature stability |
Commercial activated carbon (AC).
However, direct comparison of adsorption performance across studies remains challenging due to variations in experimental conditions (e.g., pollutant concentration, pH, temperature, and contact time). Although high adsorption capacities are frequently reported, key aspects such as regeneration efficiency, long-term stability, and scalability are not systematically evaluated, with most studies reporting only a limited number of reuse cycles (Table ). In addition, the surface area of biomass-derived adsorbents varies widely, often within or exceeding the typical range for activated carbons (500–1500 m2 g–1). However, higher surface area does not necessarily translate into superior adsorption performance, as factors such as pore size distribution and surface functionality play a decisive role.
Therefore, while biomass-derived adsorbents represent a sustainable and versatile class of materials, further efforts are needed to establish standardized evaluation protocols and to better understand the relationship between structure, surface chemistry, and adsorption performance. In this context, comparative studies between commercial and biomass-derived adsorbents under standardized conditions are particularly important to assess their practical potential.
4. Challenges and Future Perspectives
The selective conversion of biomass, particularly lignocellulosic biomass, into platform molecules such as furfural and HMF is often limited by side reactions, including polymerization and humin formation, which reduce yields and complicate downstream purification. The development of catalysts capable of controlling these competing pathways remains a significant challenge.
Although biomass-derived sulfonated carbon catalysts have demonstrated promising catalytic activity, their long-term stability, resistance to functional group leaching, and efficient reusability remain major limitations. For instance, in reactions conducted at elevated temperatures, sulfonic groups tend to detach from the carbon framework at temperatures above 170 °C, as evidenced by thermogravimetric analysis. Therefore, strategies aimed at improving the anchoring of acidic groups and controlling surface chemistry are essential.
Another important aspect concerns the structural control of biomass-derived carbons. The relationship between porosity, surface functional groups, and catalytic performance is not yet fully understood. From a technological perspective, the scalability of hydrothermal carbonization and pyrolysis processes must also be addressed, as variations in biomass composition (cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin) can significantly affect material properties.
In light of these considerations, there remains substantial opportunities remain for research focused on integrating biomass conversion processes within biorefineries and developing advanced carbon materials with tunable surface chemistry and enhanced catalytic stability.
5. Conclusions
In summary, this review advances the understanding of lignocellulosic biomass valorization by systematically connecting the production of platform molecules, such as furfural and HMF, with the development of biomass-derived carbonaceous materials. Considering these fields within a unified framework enables the identification of converging design principles and relationships that are not readily apparent when addressed separately. Despite substantial progress in catalytic conversion and material synthesis, key limitations persist. Variability in experimental conditions, the absence of standardized benchmarking protocols, and the limited evaluation of catalyst stability and recyclability hinder meaningful comparison across studies and obscure the identification of scalable systems. In addition, challenges related to catalyst deactivation, process integration, and product separation remain critical barriers to practical implementation.
The analysis presented here highlights underexplored opportunities at the interface of biomass-derived intermediates and carbon-based materials, particularly in the rational design of multifunctional systems and the elucidation of structure–performance relationships. Advancing the field will require the development of robust and regenerable catalysts, the adoption of consistent evaluation criteria, and the integration of catalytic and separation processes, supported by techno-economic analysis.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Minas Gerais State Research Support Foundation (FAPEMIG, Brazil) for financial support through the research productivity grant awarded to P.F.P. (Process APQ-06576-24) and the postdoctoral fellowship awarded to A.A.J. (Process APD-00852-25). The authors also acknowledge the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES, Funding Code 001) and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development for their additional financial support. The authors further acknowledge the use of Canva for graphical design support and ChemDraw for the preparation of chemical structures and reaction schemes.
All authors contributed significantly to this work.
The Article Processing Charge for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES), Brazil (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614).
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Araujo R. O., Ribeiro F. C. P., Santos V. O., Lima V. M. R., Santos J. L., Vilaça J. E. S., Chaar J. S., Falcão N. P. S., Pohlit A. M., de Souza L. K. C.. Renewable Energy from Biomass: An Overview of the Amazon Region. Bioenergy Res. 2022;15(2):834–849. doi: 10.1007/s12155-021-10308-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Alcocer-García H., Sánchez-Ramírez E., García-García E., Ramírez-Márquez C., Ponce-Ortega J. M.. Unlocking the Potential of Biomass Resources: A Review on Sustainable Process Design and Intensification. Resources. 2025;14(9):143. doi: 10.3390/resources14090143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Purvis B., Mao Y., Robinson D.. Three Pillars of Sustainability: In Search of Conceptual Origins. Sustain. Sci. 2019;14(3):681–695. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pondurai, S. ; Venkatachalam, G. ; Ranganathan, P. . Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessments Insights: Transforming Waste Biomass into Sustainable Bio-LPG. In LCA and TEA for Sustainable Development; Agarwal, A. K. , Biswas, S. , Eds.; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2025; pp 79–100. [Google Scholar]
- Ventura M., Marinas A., Domine M. E.. Catalytic Processes for Biomass-Derived Platform Molecules Valorisation. Top. Catal. 2020;63(9):846–865. doi: 10.1007/s11244-020-01309-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Arias K. S., Velty A., Climent M. J., Iborra S.. Valorization of Biomass Platform Molecules through One-Pot Cascade Processes Using Heterogeneous Catalysts. Tetrahedron Green Chem. 2024;3:100037. doi: 10.1016/j.tgchem.2024.100037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ng, D. K. S. ; Ng, K. S. ; Ng, R. T. L. . Integrated Biorefineries. In Encyclopedia of Sustainable Technologies; Abraham, M. A. , Ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2017; pp 299–314. [Google Scholar]
- Masoumi, S. ; Borugadda, V. B. ; Dalai, A. K. . Biocrude Oil Production via Hydrothermal Liquefaction of Algae and Upgradation Techniques to Liquid Transportation Fuels. In Biorefinery of Alternative Resources: Targeting Green Fuels and Platform Chemicals; Nanda, S. N. , Vo, D.-V. , Sarangi, P. , Eds.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2020; pp 249–270. 10.1007/978-981-15-1804-1_11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tomczyk A., Sokołowska Z., Boguta P.. Biochar Physicochemical Properties: Pyrolysis Temperature and Feedstock Kind Effects. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 2020;19(1):191–215. doi: 10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Konwar L. J., Mäki-Arvela P., Mikkola J.-P.. SO3H-Containing Functional Carbon Materials: Synthesis, Structure, and Acid Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2019;119(22):11576–11630. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro F. C. P., Santos J. L., Araujo R. O., Santos V. O., Chaar J. S., Tenório J. A. S., De Souza L. K. C.. Sustainable Catalysts for Esterification: Sulfonated Carbon Spheres from Biomass Waste Using Hydrothermal Carbonization. Renewable Energy. 2024;220:119653. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119653. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Filgueiras A. C., dos S Junior G. A., de O Pinto G. H. M., de P S Pereira S., Cerceau C. I., de A Andrade T., Lopes R. P., Pinheiro P. F.. Production of Alkyl Levulinates by the Alcoholysis of Furfuryl Alcohol over Biomass-Derived Sulfonated Hydrothermal Carbons. Energy Fuels. 2025;39(41):19735–19746. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c03628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lorenzini L., Anunciação M. G., Gomes I. B., Silva R. C. F., Silva T. A., Moreira R. P. L., Pinto P. S., Teixeira A. P. C.. Incorporation of Co and Ni Nanoparticles into Sustainable Mesoporous Carbons for Hydrogen Evolution from Sodium Borohydride. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2025;135:382–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.05.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Darjazi H., Bottoni L., Moazami H. R., Rezvani S. J., Balducci L., Sbrascini L., Staffolani A., Tombesi A., Nobili F.. From Waste to Resources: Transforming Olive Leaves to Hard Carbon as Sustainable and Versatile Electrode Material for Li/Na-Ion Batteries and Supercapacitors. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023;21:100313. doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2022.100313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y., Zhou H., Sun D., Zhou Y., Ban L., Tang B., Yang S., Hu J., Ma T., Zhang H.. Biomass-Derived Donor-Acceptor Photocatalysts with Reinforced Interfacial Charge Transfer for Efficient and Sustainable Water Purification. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy. 2026;391:126679. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2026.126679. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yan Q., Chen Y., Tang B., Wu X., Zhou H., Wang H., Li H., Lu L., Zhang H., Yang S., Xu C., Ma T.. Precise Engineering of Asymmetric Tri-Active Sites by Symbiotic Strategy for Photocontrolled Directional Reforming of Biomass. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2025;64(26):e202505718. doi: 10.1002/anie.202505718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bot B. V., Sosso O. T., Tamba J. G., Lekane E., Bikai J., Ndame M. K.. Preparation and Characterization of Biomass Briquettes Made from Banana Peels, Sugarcane Bagasse, Coconut Shells and Rattan Waste. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023;13(9):7937–7946. doi: 10.1007/s13399-021-01762-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gomes H. G. M. F., Lopes D. V., Moura J. M., Ribeiro J. P., Cruz N. C., Matos M. A. A., Tarelho L. A. C.. Biomass Fly Ash Granules as a Promising Catalyst to Promote Producer Gas Quality from Residual Forest Biomass Steam Gasification. Energy. 2025;319:134889. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2025.134889. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Du L., Quan B., Xu Z., Sun X., Luo Y., Travas-Sejdic J., Zhu B.. Biomass-Derived Laser-Induced Graphene Doped with Nitrogen and Sulfur for Enhanced Supercapacitor Performance. Carbon. 2025;238:120225. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2025.120225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu X., Liu M., Sun Q., Ma J., Xia A., Huang Y., Zhu X., Liao Q.. Elucidation of the Interaction Effects of Cellulose, Hemicellulose and Lignin during Degradative Solvent Extraction of Lignocellulosic Biomass. Fuel. 2022;327:125141. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Azfaralariff A., Razali N., Abdul Khalil H. P. S., Ahmad M. I., Abdullah C. K., Yahya E. B., Iqbal M., Zain M. S. C.. Transforming Agricultural Waste into Sustainable Bioadsorbents and Advanced Bioaerogels from Durian (Durio Zibethinus) Peel. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 2025;19(6):1706–1727. doi: 10.1002/bbb.2771. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen C., Chen W., Zhou M., Xiong Y., Ji X., Zhou M., Zhang L., Rao X., Jiang J.. Co-ZIF Reinforced Kraft Lignin Biochar as an Efficient Catalyst for Highly Selective Hydrodeoxygenation of Lignin-Derived Chemicals. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;492:152353. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.152353. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Saldarriaga-Hernández S., Velasco-Ayala C., Leal-Isla Flores P., de Jesús Rostro-Alanis M., Parra-Saldivar R., Iqbal H. M. N., Carrillo-Nieves D.. Biotransformation of Lignocellulosic Biomass into Industrially Relevant Products with the Aid of Fungi-Derived Lignocellulolytic Enzymes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020;161:1099–1116. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marriott P. E., Gómez L. D., McQueen-Mason S. J.. Unlocking the Potential of Lignocellulosic Biomass through Plant Science. New Phytol. 2016;209(4):1366–1381. doi: 10.1111/nph.13684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gan P., Zhang K., Yang G., Li J., Zhao Y., Chen J.. Catalytic Production and Upgrading of Furfural: A Platform Compound. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024;25(22):11992. doi: 10.3390/ijms252211992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Almeida S. G. C., Mello G. F., Kovacs T. K., Silva D. D. V., Costa M. A. M., Dussán K. J.. Furfural Production Through Two Bioconversion Routes: Experimental Optimization and Process Simulation. Waste Biomass Valor. 2022;13(9):4013–4025. doi: 10.1007/s12649-022-01825-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Vojtová I., Leinweber P., Weidlich T.. Small Molecules Effective for Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass to Furfural and Its Derivatives. Catalysts. 2024;14(11):791. doi: 10.3390/catal14110791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu Y., Lin Q., Zhao L., Zhu R., Wang X., Ren J., Qi W., Li L.. Mechanism Insights into the Upgrading of Xylose to Furfural over the Carbon-Based Catalysts in Aqueous Media. Fuel. 2024;378:132844. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132844. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- He Q., Lu Y., Peng Q., Chen W., Fan G., Chai B., Song G.. Synthesis of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural from Fructose Catalyzed by Sulfonated Carbon-Based Solid Acid. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2023;13(10):9195–9203. doi: 10.1007/s13399-021-01847-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Megbenu H. K., Kassym K., Ingkar G., Balu A. M., Shaimardan M., Luque R., Nuraje N.. Continuous Flow Synthesis of Furfural from Biomass-Derived Waste Using a ZnCl2/NaCl Catalytic System. Results Eng. 2025;27:105680. doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105680. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ariyanti D., Rimantho D., Leonardus M., Ardyani T., Lisnawati, Fiviyanti S., Sarwana W., Hanifah Y., Agustian E., Meliana Y., Susparini N. T., Fansuri M. H., Putra O. A., Simanungkalit S.. Valorization of Corn Cob Waste for Furfural Production: A Circular Economy Approach. Biomass Bioenergy. 2025;194:107665. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107665. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rakhatkyzy M., Askar Z., Akhmetzhanova Z., Nuraje N., Shah D.. Innovative Microwave and Continuous Flow Synthesis of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural from Biomass-Derived Resources Using Deep Eutectic Solvents. Chem. Eng. J. 2024;499:156304. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2024.156304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Contreras-Zarazúa G., Martin-Martin M., Sánchez-Ramirez E., Segovia-Hernández J. G.. Furfural Production from Agricultural Residues Using Different Intensified Separation and Pretreatment Alternatives. Economic and Environmental Assessment. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2022;171:108569. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2021.108569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jiménez-Gómez C. P., Cecilia J. A., García-Sancho C., Moreno-Tost R., Maireles-Torres P.. Selective Production of Furan from Gas-Phase Furfural Decarbonylation on Ni-MgO Catalysts. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019;7(8):7676–7685. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhao W., Song S., Ding M., Luo W., Li L., Li X.. Bypassing In Situ CO Poisoning in Furfural Conversion: Electron-Deficient Pd Single-Atom Alloys Enable One-Step Selective Synthesis of Tetrahydrofuran. Angew. Chem. 2025;137(32):e202507984. doi: 10.1002/ange.202507984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chauhan A. S., Singh O., Das P.. Renewable Furfural and 2-Methylfuran Valorization: Catalytic Routes for the Production of Sustainable Aviation C-15 Fuel Precursors. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2025;9(18):4775–4792. doi: 10.1039/D5SE00639B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Angellotti G., Li Petri G., Valenza C., Luque R., Ciriminna R., Pagliaro M.. A Case Study in the Emerging Bioeconomy: Biobased Solvents Dihydrolevoglucosenone and 2-Methyltetrahydrofuran. RSC Sustainability. 2026;4(2):735–741. doi: 10.1039/D5SU00745C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Z., Wang X., Zhang C., Yang Y., Zhou L., Cheng H., Zhao F.. Selective Hydrogenolysis of Tetrahydrofurfuryl Alcohol to 1,5-Pentanediol over PrOx Promoted Ni Catalysts. Catal. Today. 2022;402:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2022.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lenk T., Rueß V., Gresch J., Schröder U.. Exploring the Electrochemical Ring Hydrogenation of Furanic Compounds. Green Chem. 2023;25(8):3077–3085. doi: 10.1039/D3GC00515A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu Y., Yang J., Mei F., Li X., Zhao C.. Bio-Based 1,4-Butanediol and Tetrahydrofuran Synthesis: Perspective. Green Chem. 2022;24(17):6450–6466. doi: 10.1039/D2GC02271K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gong H., Zhang J., Li Q., Wei L., Hu Y., Rui Y., Shi X.-L.. Catalytic Conversion of Levulinic Acid or Furfural Alcohol into Ethyl Levulinate Using a Sulfonic Acid-Functionalized Coffee Biochar. Fuel. 2023;352:129059. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gupta S. S. R., Kantam M. L.. Catalytic Conversion of Furfuryl Alcohol or Levulinic Acid into Alkyl Levulinates Using a Sulfonic Acid-Functionalized Hafnium-Based MOF. Catal. Commun. 2019;124:62–66. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2019.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X., Li B., Han G., Liu X., Cao Z., Jiang D., Sun Y.. Electrocatalytic Synthesis of Heterocycles from Biomass-Derived Furfuryl Alcohols. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):1868. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22157-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tondi G., Cefarin N., Sepperer T., D’Amico F., Berger R. J. F., Musso M., Birarda G., Reyer A., Schnabel T., Vaccari L.. Understanding the Polymerization of Polyfurfuryl Alcohol: Ring Opening and Diels-Alder Reactions. Polymers. 2019;11(12):2126. doi: 10.3390/polym11122126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Audemar M., Wang Y., Zhao D., Royer S., Jérôme F., Len C., De Oliveira Vigier K.. Synthesis of Furfuryl Alcohol from Furfural: A Comparison between Batch and Continuous Flow Reactors. Energies. 2020;13(4):1002. doi: 10.3390/en13041002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cao Q., Zhang W., Luo S., Guo R., Xu D.. Synthesis of Furanic Ethers from Furfuryl Alcohol for Biofuel Production. Energy Fuels. 2021;35(15):12725–12733. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chaffey D. R., Davies T. E., Taylor S. H., Graham A. E.. Etherification Reactions of Furfuryl Alcohol in the Presence of Orthoesters and Ketals: Application to the Synthesis of Furfuryl Ether Biofuels. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2018;6(4):4996–5002. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04636. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu D., Farooq A.. Gamma-Valerolactone (GVL) as a Biofuel: Investigation of GVL Thermal Decomposition and GVL + OH Reaction. Combust. Flame. 2023;253:112771. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2023.112771. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S., Li J., Xia X., Wang J., Xu Q., Liu X., Yin D.. Zirconium-Malate Coordination Polymer: A Green Catalyst for Transfer Hydrogenation of Ethyl Levulinate to Synthesize γ-Valerolactone. Mol. Catal. 2025;586:115454. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2025.115454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xue W., Ma M., Hou P., Zhang P., Liu W., Liu Y., Yue H., Wang X., Tian G., Feng S.. One-Pot Tandem Conversion of Furfural to γ-Valerolactone over a Series of Modified Zirconium-Based Metal–Organic Frameworks with Variational Lewis and Brønsted Acid Sites. Fuel. 2024;371:132115. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shao Y., Ba S., Sun K., Gao G., Fan M., Wang J., Fan H., Zhang L., Hu X.. Selective Production of γ-Valerolactone or 1,4-Pentanediol from Levulinic Acid/Esters over Co-Based Catalyst: Importance of the Synergy of Hydrogenation Sites and Acidic Sites. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;429:132433. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.132433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lokhande P., Dhepe P. L.. Selective and Robust Ru Catalyst for the Aqueous Phase Aerobic Oxidation of Furfural to 2-Furoic Acid. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15(40):47004–47015. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c09965. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mortier J., Stevens C. V., Heugebaert T. S. A.. Efficient Continuous Flow Oxidation of Furfural to Maleic Anhydride Using O2 as a Green Oxidant. Green Chem. 2025;27(18):5063–5072. doi: 10.1039/D4GC06305H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li X., Ko J., Zhang Y.. Highly Efficient Gas-Phase Oxidation of Renewable Furfural to Maleic Anhydride over Plate Vanadium Phosphorus Oxide Catalyst. ChemSusChem. 2018;11(3):612–618. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201701866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Palai Y. N., Shrotri A., Fukuoka A.. Selective Oxidation of Furfural to Succinic Acid over Lewis Acidic Sn-Beta. ACS Catal. 2022;12(6):3534–3542. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.1c05348. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Verma M., Mandyal P., Singh D., Gupta N.. Recent Developments in Heterogeneous Catalytic Routes for the Sustainable Production of Succinic Acid from Biomass Resources. ChemSusChem. 2020;13(16):4026–4034. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202000690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Jong E., Mascal M., Constant S., Claessen T., Tosi P., Mija A.. The Origin, Composition, and Applications of Industrial Humins – a Review. Green Chem. 2025;27(12):3136–3166. doi: 10.1039/D4GC06244B. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wassenberg A., Esser T., Poller M. J., Albert J.. Investigation of the Formation, Characterization, and Oxidative Catalytic Valorization of Humins. Materials. 2023;16(7):2864. doi: 10.3390/ma16072864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Velasco Calderón J. C., Arora J. S., Mushrif S. H.. Mechanistic Investigation into the Formation of Humins in Acid-Catalyzed Biomass Reactions. ACS Omega. 2022;7(49):44786–44795. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c04783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Di Carmine G., Leonardi C., Forster L., Hu M., Lee D., Parlett C. M. A., Bortolini O., Isaacs M. A., Massi A., D’Agostino C.. Humin Formation on SBA-15-Pr-SO3 H Catalysts during the Alcoholysis of Furfuryl Alcohol to Ethyl Levulinate: Effect of Pore Size on Catalyst Stability, Transport, and Adsorption. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2023;15(20):24528–24540. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c04613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Niu Q., Du X., Li K., Ghysels S., Lu Q., Prins W., Ronsse F.. Coke Formation and Mineral Accumulation on HZSM-5/Al2O3 Catalysts during in-Situ Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Microalgae over Multiple Regeneration Cycles. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2024;182:106701. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2024.106701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Han X., Li C., Liu X., Xia Q., Wang Y.. Selective Oxidation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-Furandicarboxylic Acid over MnOx–CeO2 Composite Catalysts. Green Chem. 2017;19(4):996–1004. doi: 10.1039/C6GC03304K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ryu G. Y., Park D., Jo Y., Truong C. C., Mishra D. K., Suh Y.-W.. Ether-Type Co-Solvents of Excellence for Aqueous Base-Free Pt-Catalyzed Oxidation of Concentrated 5-(Hydroxymethyl)Furfural to 2,5-Furandicarboxylic Acid. Biomass Bioenergy. 2024;180:107022. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.107022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dong Z., Zhang Y., Xia H.. Selective Hydrogenolysis of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural to 2,5-Dimethylfuran with High Yield over Bimetallic Ru–Co/AC Catalysts. RSC Adv. 2024;14(21):14982–14991. doi: 10.1039/D4RA02054E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang K., Meng Q., Wu H., He M., Han B.. Selective Hydrogenolysis of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-Dimethylfuran under Mild Conditions Using Pd/MOF-808. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2022;10(31):10286–10293. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02393. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Elsayed I., Jackson M. A., Hassan E. B.. Catalytic Hydrogenation and Etherification of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural into 2-(Alkoxymethyl)-5-Methylfuran and 2,5-Bis(Alkoxymethyl)Furan as Potential Biofuel Additives. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021;213:106672. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106672. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Allen M. C., Hoffman A. J., Liu T., Webber M. S., Hibbitts D., Schwartz T. J.. Highly Selective Cross-Etherification of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural with Ethanol. ACS Catal. 2020;10(12):6771–6785. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c01328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dalla Torre D., Trapasso G., Jourdainne N., Guigo N., Aricò F.. Etherification of Bio-Based Furanic Compounds via Continuous Flow. Adv. Sustainable Syst. 2025;9(9):e00526. doi: 10.1002/adsu.202500526. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Portilla-Zuñiga O. M., Martínez J. J., Casella M., Lick D. I., Sathicq A. ´. G., Luque R., Romanelli G. P.. Etherification of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Using a Heteropolyacid Supported on a Silica Matrix. Mol. Catal. 2020;494:111125. doi: 10.1016/j.mcat.2020.111125. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang T., Xie W., Pang Y., Qiu W., Feng Y., Li X., Wei J., Tang X., Lin L.. Solvent-Free Hydrogenation of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural and Furfural to Furanyl Alcohols and Their Self-Condensation Polymers. ChemSusChem. 2022;15(13):e202200186. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202200186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar K., Pathak S., Upadhyayula S.. Acetalization of 5-Hydroxymethyl Furfural into Biofuel Additive Cyclic Acetal Using Protic Ionic Liquid Catalyst- A Thermodynamic and Kinetic Analysis. Renewable Energy. 2021;167:282–293. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson A. M., Hensley J. E., Medlin J. W.. Bifunctional Catalysts for Upgrading of Biomass-Derived Oxygenates: A Review. ACS Catal. 2016;6(8):5026–5043. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.6b00923. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen C., Lv M., Hu H., Huai L., Zhu B., Fan S., Wang Q., Zhang J.. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural and Its Downstream Chemicals: A Review of Catalytic Routes. Adv. Mater. 2024;36(37):2311464. doi: 10.1002/adma.202311464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sebeia N., Al-Ghamdi Y. O., Jabli M., Sonsudin F.. Preparation of Biochar from Pergularia Tomentosa Pods: Functionalization with Poly(Diallyldimethylammonium Chloride), Characterization, and Application to the Adsorption of Acid Blue 25 and Acid Red 18 from Water. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2025;15(11):17853–17867. doi: 10.1007/s13399-024-06386-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar S., Soomro S. A., Harijan K., Uqaili M. A., Akhter F.. Sustainable Catalysis in Biodiesel Production Using Date Seed–Derived Sulfonated Biochar. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2025;15(11):16921–16930. doi: 10.1007/s13399-024-06275-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rijo B., Serralha F. N., Dias A. P. S.. Catalytic Applications of Biochar in Biodiesel Production: Insights and Comparisons with Sulfonated Chars. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefin. 2026;20:1289. doi: 10.1002/bbb.70138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu X., Liu H., Wang Q., Jia W., Wang H., Li W., Zheng J., Sun Y., Tang X., Zeng X., Xu F., Lin L.. Selective Oxidation of Furfural to 2(5H)-Furanone and Maleic Acid over CuMoO4 . ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2021;9(39):13176–13187. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03420. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Stefani M., Lunardi V. B., Go A. W., Cheng K.-C., Hsu H.-Y., Lin S.-P., Angkawijaya A. E., Lin H.-W., Simanullang W. F., Hsieh C.-W., Santoso S. P., Ismadji S.. Transforming Spent Coffee Grounds into Sulfonated Char: An Eco-Innovative Method Using a Refined Simultaneous Sulfonation-Carbonization Process. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2025;15(24):30775–30794. doi: 10.1007/s13399-025-06881-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang M., Sun R., Song G., Wu L., Ye H., Xu L., Parikh S. J., Nguyen T., Khan E., Vithanage M., Ok Y. S.. Enhanced Removal of Ammonium from Water Using Sulfonated Reed Waste Biochar-A Lab-Scale Investigation. Environ. Pollut. 2022;292:118412. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Aderibigbe D. O., Dabo O. S., Akinwumi V. O., Giwa A.-R. A.. Competitive Adsorption of Congo Red by Sawdust in the Presence of Reactive Black 5 and the Effect of Ionic Strength. Water Pract. Technol. 2025;20(5):1042–1059. doi: 10.2166/wpt.2025.066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- El-Nemr M. A., Ismail I. M. A., Abdelmonem N. M., El Nemr A., Ragab S.. Amination of Biochar Surface from Watermelon Peel for Toxic Chromium Removal Enhancement. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2021;36:199–222. doi: 10.1016/j.cjche.2020.08.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Wang Y., Xia H., Ren Q., Li Y., Xu L., Xie C., Wang Y.. “One-Can” Strategy for the Synthesis of Hydrothermal Biochar Modified with Phosphate Groups and Efficient Removal of Uranium(VI) J. Environ. Radioact. 2023;263:107182. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sismanoglu S., Abdulmahdi Shakir S., Sahin Kol H., Bani Hani Y., Aghlara E., Akalin M. K.. Comparison of Effective Removal of Cationic Malachite Green Dye from Waste Water with Three Different Adsorbents: Date Palm, Date Palm Biochar and Phosphated Biochar. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2025;105(5):981–1000. doi: 10.1080/03067319.2023.2278084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Peng Y., Tong W., Xie Y., Hu W., Li Y., Zhang Y., Wang Y.. Yeast Biomass-Induced Co2P/Biochar Composite for Sulfonamide Antibiotics Degradation through Peroxymonosulfate Activation. Environ. Pollut. 2021;268:115930. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hublikar L. V., Nivedhitha K. S., Chikkatti B. S., Sajjan A. M., Banapurmath N. R., Palaniswamy D., Beena T., Hegde P., Mishra S. K., Ravulapati K.. Functionalized Biochar–Metal Oxide Nanocomposites for the Catalytic Degradation of Recalcitrant Pollutants in Wastewater Treatment. RSC Adv. 2026;16(14):12186–12214. doi: 10.1039/D5RA07670F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Poirier A., Fertahi S., Hamiach H., Tayibi S., Elhaissoufi W., Arji M., Zeroual Y., Raihane M., Bargaz A., Barakat A.. Bio-Based Polymers and Biochar Materials Formulation Derived from Lignocellulosic Biomass for Controlled Release Phosphorus Fertilizers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025;304:140255. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.140255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Da Silva R. W., Passos R. R., Rodrigues Silva Loquez M. H., Andrade F. V., Andrade Santos D., Rangel O. J. P., Mendonça E. D. S.. Agronomic Efficiency of Biochar-Based Organophosphate Fertilizers. ACS Agric. Sci. Technol. 2025;5(7):1392–1399. doi: 10.1021/acsagscitech.5c00142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Quevedo-Amador R. A., Escalera-Velasco B. P., Arias A. M. R., Reynel-Ávila H. E., Moreno-Piraján J. C., Giraldo L., Bonilla-Petriciolet A.. Application of Waste Biomass for the Production of Biofuels and Catalysts: A Review. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 2024;26(4):943–997. doi: 10.1007/s10098-023-02728-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Isahak W. N. R. W., Al-Amiery A.. Catalysts Driving Efficiency and Innovation in Thermal Reactions: A Comprehensive Review. Green Technol. Sustainability. 2024;2(2):100078. doi: 10.1016/j.grets.2024.100078. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Buaki-Sogó M., Zubizarreta L., García-Pellicer M., Quijano-López A.. Sustainable Carbon as Efficient Support for Metal-Based Nanocatalyst: Applications in Energy Harvesting and Storage. Molecules. 2020;25(14):3123. doi: 10.3390/molecules25143123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tyagi U., Anand N.. Prospective of Waste Lignocellulosic Biomass as Precursors for the Production of Biochar: Application, Performance, and MechanismA Review. Bioenergy Res. 2023;16(3):1335–1360. doi: 10.1007/s12155-022-10560-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Q., Wang B., Feng Y., Feng Y., Li J., Ding S., He H., Xie H.. Process Water from Hydrothermal Carbonization: The Impacts on the Aquatic Dissolved Organic Matter Feature and Microbial Network at the Soil-Water Interface. J. Cleaner Prod. 2023;397:136486. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136486. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Campos J. L. B., Pinheiro P. H. L., da Silva R. M., Carvalho C. T., Trindade M. A., Rodrigues R.. Disclosing Surface Functionality Evolution in H2SO4-Assisted Hydrothermally Carbonized Lignocellulosic Precursors: Deciphering the Roles of Lignin and Cellulose. Fuel. 2025;382:133610. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2024.133610. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Masoumi S., Borugadda V. B., Nanda S., Dalai A. K.. Hydrochar: A Review on Its Production Technologies and Applications. Catalysts. 2021;11(8):939. doi: 10.3390/catal11080939. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Castro A. J. R., Saraiva G. D., Oliveira A. C., Neto V. O. S., Soares F. H., Vieira L. H. S., Filho A. G. S., Ferreira O. P.. Synthesis and Detailed Characterization of Hydrochars and Biochars from Chitosan. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2025;15(9):14123–14136. doi: 10.1007/s13399-024-06270-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lee J., Kim K.-H., Kwon E. E.. Biochar as a Catalyst. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017;77:70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Araujo R. O., Santos V. O., Ribeiro F. C. P., Chaar J. D. S., Falcão N. P. S., De Souza L. K. C.. One-Step Synthesis of a Heterogeneous Catalyst by the Hydrothermal Carbonization of Acai Seed. React. Kinet., Mech. Catal. 2021;134(1):199–220. doi: 10.1007/s11144-021-02059-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Da Luz Corrêa A. P., Bastos R. R. C., Rocha Filho G. N. D., Zamian J. R., Conceição L. R. V. D.. Preparation of Sulfonated Carbon-Based Catalysts from Murumuru Kernel Shell and Their Performance in the Esterification Reaction. RSC Adv. 2020;10(34):20245–20256. doi: 10.1039/D0RA03217D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fonseca J. M., Spessato L., Cazetta A. L., Da Silva C., Almeida V. D. C.. Sulfonated Carbon: Synthesis, Properties and Production of Biodiesel. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 2022;170:108668. doi: 10.1016/j.cep.2021.108668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sripada S., Kastner J. R.. Catalytic Esterification Using Solid Acid Carbon Catalysts Synthesized by Sustainable Hydrothermal and Plasma Sulfonation Techniques. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022;61(11):3928–3940. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c00086. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ao S., Alghamdi L. A., Kress T., Selvaraj M., Halder G., Wheatley A. E. H., Lalthazuala Rokhum S.. Microwave-Assisted Valorization of Glycerol to Solketal Using Biomass-Derived Heterogeneous Catalyst. Fuel. 2023;345:128190. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Rocha P. D., Oliveira L. S., Franca A. S.. Sulfonated Activated Carbon from Corn Cobs as Heterogeneous Catalysts for Biodiesel Production Using Microwave-Assisted Transesterification. Renewable Energy. 2019;143:1710–1716. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yadav G., Yadav N., Ahmaruzzaman Md.. Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Biodiesel by a Green Carbon-Based Heterogeneous Catalyst Derived from Areca Nut Husk by One-Pot Hydrothermal Carbonization. Sci. Rep. 2022;12(1):21455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25877-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tobío-Pérez I., Domínguez Y. D., Machín L. R., Pohl S., Lapuerta M., Piloto-Rodríguez R.. Biomass-Based Heterogeneous Catalysts for Biodiesel Production: A Comprehensive Review. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022;46(4):3782–3809. doi: 10.1002/er.7436. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bekele D. T., Shibeshi N. T., Reshad A. S.. Heterogeneous Catalysts from Metallic Oxides and Lignocellulosic Biomasses Ash for the Valorization of Feedstocks into Biodiesel: An Overview. Bioenergy Res. 2023;16(3):1361–1379. doi: 10.1007/s12155-022-10546-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Erchamo Y. S., Mamo T. T., Workneh G. A., Mekonnen Y. S.. Improved Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil with Mixed Methanol–Ethanol Using Enhanced Eggshell-Derived CaO Nano-Catalyst. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):6708. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86062-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pandit P. R., Fulekar M. H.. Biodiesel Production from Microalgal Biomass Using CaO Catalyst Synthesized from Natural Waste Material. Renewable Energy. 2019;136:837–845. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Das V., Tripathi A. M., Borah M. J., Dunford N. T., Deka D.. Cobalt-Doped CaO Catalyst Synthesized and Applied for Algal Biodiesel Production. Renewable Energy. 2020;161:1110–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- El-Naggar K. A., Mansor E. S., Maafa I. M., Abutaleb A., Yousef A., Matar S. M., Hamid E. M. A.. Valorization of Marble Sludge Waste in Biodiesel Production Using a Central Composite Design. Sci. Rep. 2024;14(1):28136. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77819-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abdul Mutalib A. A., Ibrahim M. L., Matmin J., Kassim M. F., Mastuli M. S., Taufiq-Yap Y. H., Shohaimi N. A. M., Islam A., Tan Y. H., Kaus N. H. M.. SiO2-Rich Sugar Cane Bagasse Ash Catalyst for Transesterification of Palm Oil. Bioenergy Res. 2020;13(3):986–997. doi: 10.1007/s12155-020-10119-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yusuff A. S., Bhonsle A. K., Trivedi J., Bangwal D. P., Singh L. P., Atray N.. Synthesis and Characterization of Coal Fly Ash Supported Zinc Oxide Catalyst for Biodiesel Production Using Used Cooking Oil as Feed. Renewable Energy. 2021;170:302–314. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.01.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tane E. G., Ruiz-Bernal Z., López-Serrano C., Lillo-Ródenas M. A., Román-Martínez M. C.. Carbon Supported Ru, Ni and RuNi Catalysts for the Transformation of Levulinic Acid to γ-Valerolactone. Activity of Carbon Metal-Free Samples and Mechanistic Insight Based on the Redox Properties of the Oxygen Surface Groups. Catal. Today. 2025;458:115366. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2025.115366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sharma S., Kaur M., Sharma C., Choudhary A., Paul S.. Biomass-Derived Activated Carbon-Supported Copper Catalyst: An Efficient Heterogeneous Magnetic Catalyst for Base-Free Chan–Lam Coupling and Oxidations. ACS Omega. 2021;6(30):19529–19545. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c01830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramirez L. A., Dennehy M., Alvarez M.. Metal Oxide-Biochar Supported Recyclable Catalysts: A Feasible Solution for the Reduction of 4-Nitrophenol in Water. Catal. Commun. 2023;181:106723. doi: 10.1016/j.catcom.2023.106723. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Omiri J., Snoussi Y., Bhakta A. K., Truong S., Ammar S., Khalil A. M., Jouini M., Chehimi M. M.. Citric-Acid-Assisted Preparation of Biochar Loaded with Copper/Nickel Bimetallic Nanoparticles for Dye Degradation. Colloids Interfaces. 2022;6(2):18. doi: 10.3390/colloids6020018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ling Z., Gu Y., He B., Chen Z., Hu H., Liu H., Ding W.. Biochar-Supported FeCo-MOF Derivative Catalyzes PDS-Mediated Degradation of Tetracycline. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2024;349:127841. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2024.127841. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou H., Zhang R., Yue C., Wu X., Yan Q., Wang H., Zhang H., Ma T.. Enhanced Charge Transfer over Sustainable Biochar Decorated Bi2WO6 Composite Photocatalyst for Highly Efficient Water Decontamination. Chin. J. Catal. 2024;59:169–184. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2067(23)64613-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang H., Ye C., Wang J., Jin H., Zhang J., Wang X., Dong C., Li G., Tang Y., Luo G., Liu H., Fang X., Xu Y.. Mechanism Study of Toluene Removal Using Iron/Nickel Bimetallic Catalysts Supported on Biochar. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;925:171732. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Magoua Mbeugang C. F., Mahmood F., Ali M., Tang J., Li B.. H2-Rich Syngas Production and Tar Removal over Biochar-Supported Ni-Fe Bimetallic Catalysts during Catalytic Pyrolysis-Gasification of Biomass. Renewable Energy. 2025;243:122547. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2025.122547. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Renda S., Di Stasi C., Manyà J. J., Palma V.. Biochar as Support in Catalytic CO2 Methanation: Enhancing Effect of CeO2 Addition. J. CO2 Util. 2021;53:101740. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101740. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Marques I. S., Jarrais B., Ramos R., Abdelkader-Fernandez V. K., Yaremchenko A., Freire C., Fernandes D. M., Peixoto A. F.. Nitrogen-Doped Biochar-Supported Metal Catalysts: High Efficiency in Both Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenation of Furfural and Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reactions. Catal. Today. 2023;418:114080. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2023.114080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Villardon A., Alcazar-Ruiz A., Cencerrero J., Romero A., Sanchez-Silva L., Dorado F.. Olive Stone-Derived Biochar as a Sustainable Catalyst Support for CO2 Methanation. J. CO2 Util. 2025;96:103102. doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun H., Ma M., Fan M., Sun K., Xu W., Wang K., Li B., Jiang J.. Controllable Preparation of Biomass Derived Mesoporous Activated Carbon Supported Nano-CaO Catalysts for Biodiesel Production. Energy. 2022;261:125369. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.125369. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Longo L., Baldassin D., Di Michele A., Bittencourt C., Menegazzo F., Signoretto M.. Activation Strategies for Rice Husk Biochar: Enhancing Porosity and Performance as a Support for Pd Catalysts in Hydrogenation Reactions. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2025;15(17):5101–5115. doi: 10.1039/D5CY00242G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xu J., Sun H., Pan X., Wang K., Zhang S., Ma M., Tan W., Liao H., Wang Y., Yuan H., Sun K., Jiang J.. One-Step Preparation of Coconut Shell Derived Mesoporous Biochar Supported CuZn Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. Biomass Bioenergy. 2025;195:107710. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107710. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jin H., Li J., Yuan Y., Wang J., Lu J., Wang S.. Recent Progress in Biomass-Derived Electrode Materials for High Volumetric Performance Supercapacitors. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018;8(23):1801007. doi: 10.1002/aenm.201801007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Keppetipola N. M., Olivier C., Toupance T., Cojocaru L.. Biomass-Derived Carbon Electrodes for Supercapacitors and Hybrid Solar Cells: Towards Sustainable Photo-Supercapacitors. Sustainable Energy Fuels. 2021;5(19):4784–4806. doi: 10.1039/D1SE00954K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Y., Shi X., Yang Y., Suo G., Zhang L., Lu S., Chen Z.. Biomass-Derived Carbon for High-Performance Batteries: From Structure to Properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022;32(24):2201584. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202201584. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sarma H. R., Sun J., Hora Y., Forsyth M., Byrne N.. Effect of Carbonization Behaviour of Cotton Biomass in Electrodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. ChemElectroChem. 2023;10(14):e202300127. doi: 10.1002/celc.202300127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo F., Jiang X., Jia X., Liang S., Qian L., Rao Z.. Synthesis of Biomass Carbon Electrode Materials by Bimetallic Activation for the Application in Supercapacitors. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019;844:105–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.05.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yue W., Yu Z., Zhang X., Liu H., He T., Ma X.. Green Activation Method and Natural N/O/S Co-Doped Strategy to Prepare Biomass-Derived Graded Porous Carbon for Supercapacitors. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2024;178:106409. doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2024.106409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dai C., Wan J., Geng W., Song S., Ma F., Shao J.. KOH Direct Treatment of Kombucha and in Situ Activation to Prepare Hierarchical Porous Carbon for High-Performance Supercapacitor Electrodes. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2017;21(10):2929–2938. doi: 10.1007/s10008-017-3631-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ali K., Javaid M. U., Ali Z., Zaghum M. J.. Biomass-Derived Adsorbents for Dye and Heavy Metal Removal from Wastewater. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2021;2021:9357509. doi: 10.1155/2021/9357509. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kshirsagar D., Thanekar P., Balapure K., Bhandari V. M.. Biomass-Derived Adsorbents and Nanocomposites for Wastewater Treatment. Mater. Today: Proc. 2023;90:18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.128. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sultana M., Rownok M. H., Sabrin M., Rahaman M. H., Alam S. M. N.. A Review on Experimental Chemically Modified Activated Carbon to Enhance Dye and Heavy Metals Adsorption. Clean Eng. Technol. 2022;6:100382. doi: 10.1016/j.clet.2021.100382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ahmed M. B., Hasan Johir M. A., Zhou J. L., Ngo H. H., Nghiem L. D., Richardson C., Moni M. A., Bryant M. R.. Activated Carbon Preparation from Biomass Feedstock: Clean Production and Carbon Dioxide Adsorption. J. Cleaner Prod. 2019;225:405–413. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Teo S. H., Ng C. H., Islam A., Abdulkareem-Alsultan G., Joseph C. G., Janaun J., Taufiq-Yap Y. H., Khandaker S., Islam G. J., Znad H., Awual M. R.. Sustainable Toxic Dyes Removal with Advanced Materials for Clean Water Production: A Comprehensive Review. J. Cleaner Prod. 2022;332:130039. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li J., Michalkiewicz B., Min J., Ma C., Chen X., Gong J., Mijowska E., Tang T.. Selective Preparation of Biomass-Derived Porous Carbon with Controllable Pore Sizes toward Highly Efficient CO2 Capture. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;360:250–259. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yaumi A. L., Bakar M. Z. A., Hameed B. H.. Melamine-Nitrogenated Mesoporous Activated Carbon Derived from Rice Husk for Carbon Dioxide Adsorption in Fixed-Bed. Energy. 2018;155:46–55. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.183. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Raj S. S., Mane M. B., Thanekar P., Balapure K., Bhandari V. M.. Development of Multipurpose Biomass-Derived Adsorbents Using Coccinia Grandis for Removal of Contaminants. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 2023;25(10):3393–3405. doi: 10.1007/s10098-023-02598-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang J., Wu Z., Niu Q., Liu L., Yang L., Fu M., Ye D., Chen P.. Highly Efficient Adsorptive Removal of Toluene Using Silicon-Modified Activated Carbon with Improved Fire Resistance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021;415:125753. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozyatnyk I., Yakupova I.. Impact of Chemical and Physical Treatments on the Structural and Surface Properties of Activated Carbon and Hydrochar. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2025;13(6):2500–2507. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c09189. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ribeiro F. C. P., Santos V. O., Araujo R. O., Santos J. L., Chaar J. S., Falcão N. P. S., Farias M. A. S., De Souza L. K. C.. Determination of the Thermal Stability of Sulfonic Groups in Heterogeneous Acid Catalysts Derived from Residue of Guarana Amazon Biomass. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2023;148(1):23–35. doi: 10.1007/s10973-022-11514-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]





