Skip to main content
PMC home page
Biophysical Journal logoLink to Biophysical Journal
. 1975 Sep;15(9):861–886. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(75)85862-0

Permselectivity of the glomerular capillary wall to macromolecules. I. Theoretical considerations.

R S Chang, C R Robertson, W M Deen, B M Brenner
PMCID: PMC1334748  PMID: 1237326

Abstract

The transport of macromolecules across the renal glomerular capillary wall has been described theoretically using flux equations based on (a) restricted transport through small pores, and (b) the Kedem-Katchalsky formulation. The various assumptions and limitations inherent in these two approaches are discussed. To examine the coupling between macromolecular solute transport and the determinants of glomerular filtration rate, these flux equations were combined with mass balance relations which allow for variations in the transmembrane driving forces along a glomerular capillary. It was predicted, using both pore theory and the Kedem-Katchalsky equations, that fractional solute clearance should be strongly dependent on the determinants of glomerular filtration rate when convection and diffusion both contribute to solute transport. When convection becomes the sole mechanism for transcapillary solute transport, however, fractional solute clearance is essentially independent of changes in the determinants of glomerular filtration rate. Consequently, unless diffusion is absent, fractional solute clearances alone are insufficient to characterize the permselective properties of the glomerular capillary wall, since these values may be altered by changes in glomerular pressures and flows as well as changes in the properties of the capillary wall per se.

Full text

PDF
861

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. L., Quinn J. A. Restricted transport in small pores. A model for steric exclusion and hindered particle motion. Biophys J. 1974 Feb;14(2):130–150. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)70005-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arturson G., Groth T., Grotte G. Human glomerular membrane porosity and filtration pressure: dextran clearance data analysed by theoretical models. Clin Sci. 1971 Feb;40(2):137–158. doi: 10.1042/cs0400137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck R. E., Schultz J. S. Hindrance of solute diffusion within membranes as measured with microporous membranes of known pore geometry. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1972 Jan 17;255(1):273–303. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(72)90028-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brenner B. M., Troy J. L., Daugharty T. M., Deen W. M., Robertson C. R. Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. II. Plasma-flow dependence of GFR. Am J Physiol. 1972 Nov;223(5):1184–1190. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1972.223.5.1184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brenner B. M., Troy J. L., Daugharty T. M. The dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1971 Aug;50(8):1776–1780. doi: 10.1172/JCI106667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chang R. L., Ueki I. F., Troy J. L., Deen W. M., Robertson C. R., Brenner B. M. Permselectivity of the glomerular capillary wall to macromolecules. II. Experimental studies in rats using neutral dextran. Biophys J. 1975 Sep;15(9):887–906. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(75)85863-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Daugharty T. M., Ueki I. F., Mercer P. F., Brenner B. M. Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. V. Response to ischemic injury. J Clin Invest. 1974 Jan;53(1):105–116. doi: 10.1172/JCI107527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Deen W. M., Maddox D. A., Robertson C. R., Brenner B. M. Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. VII. Response to reduced renal mass. Am J Physiol. 1974 Sep;227(3):556–562. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1974.227.3.556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Deen W. M., Robertson C. R., Brenner B. M. A model of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1972 Nov;223(5):1178–1183. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1972.223.5.1178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deen W. M., Robertson C. R., Brenner B. M. Concentration polarization in an ultrafiltering capillary. Biophys J. 1974 May;14(5):412–431. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(74)85924-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Deen W. M., Troy J. L., Robertson C. R., Brenner B. M. Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. IV. Determination of the ultrafiltration coefficient. J Clin Invest. 1973 Jun;52(6):1500–1508. doi: 10.1172/JCI107324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gassée J. P. Effects of acetylcholine on glomerular sieving of macromolecules. Pflugers Arch. 1973 Aug 27;342(3):239–254. doi: 10.1007/BF00591372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. KEDEM O., KATCHALSKY A. Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to non-electrolytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1958 Feb;27(2):229–246. doi: 10.1016/0006-3002(58)90330-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Maddox D. A., Bennett C. M., Deen W. M., Glassock R. J., Knutson D., Daugharty T. M., Brenner B. M. Determinants of glomerular filtration in experimental glomerulonephritis in the rat. J Clin Invest. 1975 Feb;55(2):305–318. doi: 10.1172/JCI107934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Maddox D. A., Deen W. M., Brenner B. M. Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration. VI. Studies in the primate. Kidney Int. 1974 Apr;5(4):271–278. doi: 10.1038/ki.1974.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Myers B. D., Deen W. M., Robertson C. R., Brenner B. M. Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. VIII. Effects of hematocrit. Circ Res. 1975 Mar;36(3):425–435. doi: 10.1161/01.res.36.3.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. PAPPENHEIMER J. R. Passage of molecules through capillary wals. Physiol Rev. 1953 Jul;33(3):387–423. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1953.33.3.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. PAPPENHEIMER J. R., RENKIN E. M., BORRERO L. M. Filtration, diffusion and molecular sieving through peripheral capillary membranes; a contribution to the pore theory of capillary permeability. Am J Physiol. 1951 Oct;167(1):13–46. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1951.167.1.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. RENKIN E. M. Filtration, diffusion, and molecular sieving through porous cellulose membranes. J Gen Physiol. 1954 Nov 20;38(2):225–243. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Robertson C. R., Deen W. M., Troy J. L., Brenner B. M. Dynamics of glomerular ultrafiltration in the rat. 3. Hemodynamics and autoregulation. Am J Physiol. 1972 Nov;223(5):1191–1200. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1972.223.5.1191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Snell F. M., Stein B. Onsager reciprocal relations in complex membranes. J Theor Biol. 1966 Feb;10(2):177–183. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90121-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Solomon A. K. Characterization of biological membranes by equivalent pores. J Gen Physiol. 1968 May;51(5 Suppl):335S+–335S+. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Van Bruggen J. T., Boyett J. D., van Bueren A. L., Galey W. R. Solute flux coupling in a homopore membrane. J Gen Physiol. 1974 Jun;63(6):639–656. doi: 10.1085/jgp.63.6.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Verniory A., Du Bois R., Decoodt P., Gassee J. P., Lambert P. P. Measurement of the permeability of biological membranes. Application to the glomerular wall. J Gen Physiol. 1973 Oct;62(4):489–507. doi: 10.1085/jgp.62.4.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society

RESOURCES