Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2026 Jun 11;15(7):e00096-26. doi: 10.1128/mra.00096-26

Draft genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus M32 isolated from a cow with subclinical mastitis in Kiruhura District, Uganda

Reagan Muhwezi 1,✉, Vidya Sankarapandian 1, G R Neel 1, Emmanuel Eilu 2, Ambrose Shabohurira 1, Ibrahim Ntulume 3, Lutaaya Festus 3, Priscilla Peter Dilli 4, Theophilus Pius 5, Naheem Adekilekun Tijani 1, Danladi Makeri 1
Editor: Julie C Dunning Hotopp6
PMCID: PMC13348129  PMID: 42274388

ABSTRACT

We report the draft genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus strain M32, isolated from a cow with subclinical mastitis in Kiruhura district, Uganda.

KEYWORDS: complete genome; antimicrobial-resistant genes; subclinical mastitis; genomic annotation; Staphylococcus aureus strain 32M; Kiruhura district, Uganda

ANNOUNCEMENT

Subclinical mastitis (SCM) poses a threat to the dairy industry in low-income nations, resulting in food insecurity and financial losses to dairy farmers (1). Studies have linked Staphylococcus aureus with the disease through the milking process (2). This genome data set provides genomic insights into putative resistance and virulence genes of S. aureus strain M32, offering valuable information for researchers studying antibiotic stewardship, disease evolution, and genetic surveillance.

A milk sample obtained from a cow in Kiruhura District, Uganda (0°12′53.0″S, 30°46′12.0″E), was tested using the California Mastitis Test for SCM, and the positive sample was cultured on blood agar. The isolate was further sub-cultured on mannitol salt agar (MSA) (HiMedia, India) and incubated aerobically for 24 h at 37°C. Yellow colonies suggestive of S. aureus were purified on fresh MSA plates and verified using positive catalase, coagulase, and Staphaurex latex agglutination assays (3). Antibiotic susceptibility testing was conducted using the Kirby-Bauer, standard disk diffusion method guided by the CLSI guidelines (4, 5). The isolate was resistant to penicillin (10 μg; 6 mm), erythromycin (15 μg; 10 mm), tetracycline (30 μg; 12 mm), and cefoxitin (30 μg; 18 mm).

Strain M32 isolate was cultured in Luria-Bertani broth, incubated in a shaker at 200 rpm for 18–24 h at 37°C, and DNA was extracted using a column-based extraction with the NEB Monarch Spin gDNA Extraction Kit, including the extra lysozyme pre-treatment step for efficient lysis of gram-positive cells (6). DNA concentration and purity were measured using the Qubit 3.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with Quant-iT dsDNA Assay Kit, High Sensitivity (Invitrogen), and NanoDrop ND 1000 spectrophotometer. Rapid barcoding kit 96V14 (SQK-RBK114.96) was used for library preparation and loaded onto an R10 flow cell (FLO-MIN114) (7). The MinION MK1B (MIN-101B) platform was used for draft genome sequencing (8). Guppy (v6.5.7-gpu) with a super-accurate base caller was used to translate the raw ionic current signals into nucleotide sequences (1D reads) (9).

Raw sequence reads were assessed for quality using NanoPlot (v1.46.0) (10), before being trimmed, yielding 16,784.0 reads, a read length N50 of 207.0 bp, and 3,619,882.0 bp bases, and after trimming, yielding 1,104.0 reads, a read length N50 of 1546.0 bp, and 1,458,609.0 bp bases. Adapter sequences and low-quality reads were trimmed using NanoFilt (v2.8.0) (10), and only high-quality reads were retained for downstream analysis. De novo genome assembly was performed using Flye (v2.9.5-b180) (11), followed by consensus polishing with Medaka. Assembly quality was evaluated using QUAST (v5.3.0) (12). Genome completeness was assessed using BUSCO (v5.8.3) (13), yielding 91.3% complete BUSCOs (90.7% single-copy, 0.5% duplicated), with 2.5% fragmented and 6.2% missing genes (n = 1,317). The assembled genome was submitted and annotated using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (v6.10) (14). The assembled genome size yielded was 2,765,223 bp with a 33% GC, 294 contigs, 14.8 kb N50, and 50 L50. For the submitted genome, CheckM (v1.2.4) quality analyzer revealed 89.67% completeness and 1.93% contamination (15). Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) analysis using FastANI (v1.34) revealed that the closest type strain to our isolate was Staphylococcus aureus subsp. aureus DSM 20,231 (GCA_000330825.2) with an ANI of 99.04%, assembly coverage of 89.46%, and type assembly coverage of 89.75%, confirming species-level identity and close relatedness in NCBI (16). Other genome characteristics are presented in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1.

Genome statistics and features of S. aureus strain M32

Parameter Value
Genes 2,927
CDSs 2,873
Ribosomal RNAs 2, 1, 1 (5S, 16S, 23S)
Transfer RNAs 46
Non-coding RNAs 4

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge farm owners who took part in the study, Kampala International University Research Ethics Committee (REC-KIU-2024-436), and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS5098ES) for approving the study.

Contributor Information

Reagan Muhwezi, Email: muhwezi@kiu.ac.ug.

Julie C. Dunning Hotopp, University of Maryland Baltimore School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

The draft genome has been submitted to NCBI GenBank under accession number JBQVMH000000000.1 (17), with BioSample number SAMN50774900 (18). Raw sequence reads and annotated genome are available under accessions SRR35120694 (19) and GCA_052439135.1 (20), respectively.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Muhwezi R, Emmanuel E, Sankarapandian V, Neel RG, Shabohurira A, Makeri D. 2025. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence and associated factors, bacterial profiles, and antibiotic susceptibility of subclinical mastitis in dairy cattle in Uganda. Scientific African 27:e02607. doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02607 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Miyama T, Byaruhanga J, Okamura I, Nagahata H, Murata R, Mwebembezi W, Muramatsu Y, Makita K. 2020. Prevalence of sub-clinical mastitis and its association with milking practices in an intensive dairy production region of Uganda. J Vet Med Sci 82:488–493. doi: 10.1292/jvms.19-0588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. McPherson RA, Pincus MR. 2021. Henry’s clinical diagnosis and management by laboratory methods E-book. Elsevier Health Sciences [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Haley E, Cockerill FR, Pesano RL, Festa RA, Luke N, Mathur M, Chen X, Havrilla J, Baunoch D. 2024. Pooled antibiotic susceptibility testing performs within CLSI standards for validation when measured against broth microdilution and disk diffusion antibiotic susceptibility testing of cultured isolates. Antibiotics (Basel) 13:1214. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13121214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pierce VM, Bhowmick T, Simner PJ. 2023. Guiding antimicrobial stewardship through thoughtful antimicrobial susceptibility testing and reporting strategies: an updated approach in 2023. J Clin Microbiol 61:e0007422. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00074-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bradshaw A, Tremble K. 2024. Dry tissue sampling and DNA extraction with NEB monarch Kit. Available from: https://www.protocols.io/view/dry-tissue-sampling-and-dna-extraction-with-neb-mo-dphe5j3e.pdf
  • 7. Lerminiaux N, Fakharuddin K, Mulvey MR, Mataseje L. 2024. Do we still need Illumina sequencing data? evaluating Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10.4.1 flow cells and the Rapid v14 library prep kit for gram negative bacteria whole genome assemblies. Can J Microbiol 70:178–189. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2023-0175 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Holmes N, Kalef-Ezra E, Proukakis C. 2024. Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) library preparation and sequencing of DNA prepared using Droplet Multiple Displacement Amplification (dMDA). Available from: https://www.protocols.io/view/oxford-nanopore-technologies-ont-library-preparati-dgvp3w5n.html
  • 9. Perešíni P, Boža V, Brejová B, Vinař T. 2021. Nanopore base calling on the edge. Bioinformatics 37:4661–4667. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. De Coster W, D’Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. 2018. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34:2666–2669. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lin Y, Yuan J, Kolmogorov M, Shen MW, Chaisson M, Pevzner PA. 2016. Assembly of long error-prone reads using de Bruijn graphs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E8396–E8405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604560113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Waterhouse RM, Seppey M, Simão FA, Manni M, Ioannidis P, Klioutchnikov G, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2018. BUSCO applications from quality assessments to gene prediction and phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol 35:543–548. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Muhwezi R. 2025. Draft genome sequence of Staphylococcus aureus strain M32. NCBI GenBank. Available from: http://identifiers.org/nucleotide:JBQVMH000000000.1
  • 18. Muhwezi R. 2025. Biosample of Staphylococcus aureus strain M32. NCBI GenBank. Available from: http://identifiers.org/biosample:SAMN50774900
  • 19. Muhwezi R. 2025. Raw sequence reads of Staphylococcus aureus strain M32. NCBI SRA. Available from: http://identifiers.org/insdc.sra:SRR35120694
  • 20. Muhwezi R. 2025. Annotated genome of Staphylococcus aureus strain M32. NCBI,GenBank. Available from: http://identifiers.org/insdc.gca:GCA_052439135.1

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The draft genome has been submitted to NCBI GenBank under accession number JBQVMH000000000.1 (17), with BioSample number SAMN50774900 (18). Raw sequence reads and annotated genome are available under accessions SRR35120694 (19) and GCA_052439135.1 (20), respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES