ABSTRACT
Antimony‐doped tin oxide (ATO) thin films were deposited by aerosol‐assisted chemical vapor deposition (AACVD) and systematically investigated to establish correlations between doping level, defect chemistry, structural properties, and optoelectronic performance. X‐ray diffraction confirmed that all films crystallized in the cassiterite structure without secondary phases, indicating successful incorporation of Sb into the SnO2 lattice. Moderate Sb doping significantly reduced film resistivity due to increased carrier concentration, while excessive doping resulted in increased resistivity and reduced mobility. Optical measurements revealed high visible transmittance and low haze, together with a characteristic bluish coloration at increased doping levels, attributed to free‐carrier absorption. Importantly, the films exhibited selective infrared blocking, positioning ATO as a promising candidate for solar‐control coatings. The optoelectronic performance was assessed using Haacke's figure of merit, with optimized samples demonstrating a favorable balance between electrical conductivity and optical transparency. CIE Lab* color coordinates were used to quantitatively evaluate the color appearance of the films. The controllable blue‐gray optical tint, combined with infrared heat shielding, positions AACVD‐deposited ATO films as promising candidates for low‐emissivity architectural glazing, as well as transparent electrode applications in optoelectronic devices.
Keywords: cassiterite, chemical vapor deposition, doping, electrical resistivity and conductivity, figure of merit, glazing, materials science, optoelectronics, thin film, tin oxide
Antimony‐doped tin oxide (ATO) thin films were deposited by aerosol‐assisted chemical vapor deposition (AACVD) and systematically investigated to establish correlations between Sb doping level, structural properties and optoelectronic performance. Optimized films exhibited low sheet resistance, high carrier concentrations, and high visible transparency comparable to sputtered ATO films. The results demonstrated AACVD as a scalable route for high‐performance transparent conducting oxide coatings with potential for low‐emissivity glazing applications.

1. Introduction
Transparent conducting oxides (TCOs) are essential materials in modern optoelectronic applications, including photovoltaics, display technologies, and smart windows, owing to their unique combination of high optical transparency and electrical conductivity [1, 2]. The commercial value of producing sustainable and efficient TCOs is significant. For a material to be considered as a TCO, it must exhibit a wide bandgap (≥ 3.1 eV), low electrical resistivity (≤10−3), a carrier concentration below 1022 cm−3, and high electron mobility [1]. The electrical resistivity depends on the density of charge carriers and their mobility [1, 3].
Commercial demands for continuous performance improvements, combined with the limited supply of indium, the key component of the widely used indium‐tin oxide (ITO), have driven significant research into finding alternative TCO materials [1, 2, 4]. Tin oxide (SnO2) and zinc oxide (ZnO), both derived from inexpensive and abundant raw materials, have gained particular attention [5, 6, 7]. These metal oxides are typically intrinsic n‐type, direct wide‐bandgap semiconductors, with properties that can be tuned through selective doping. SnO2‐based films are often preferred due to their resistance to chemical attack, thermal degradation, and mechanical durability, making them ideal for thin film applications in commercial products [6, 7, 8, 9].
Thin films based on tin(IV) oxide have a wide fundamental bandgap (>3.6 eV) and strong stability, making them a good and cost‐effective alternative to the more expensive indium‐tin oxide (ITO) films [10, 11, 12, 13]. Improving electrical n‐type conductivity can be achieved by adding intrinsic defects, like oxygen vacancies, or by using extrinsic defects through aliovalent dopants, such as higher‐valency cations [8, 9, 10, 11]. For nominally undoped SnO2, the resistivity is typically limited to the range of 102–103 Ω cm [14, 15, 16]. Dopants such as fluorine and antimony have widely been reported to enhance the n‐type conductivity of SnO2, with antimony doping also resulting in blue‐colored films [8, 9]. However, excessive doping is not desirable as it can negatively affect conductivity by degrading the film structure, which leads to a reduction in the mobility of free charge carriers [17, 18, 19, 20].
In this work, the impact of Sb‐doping concentration on the structural, optical and electrical properties of SnO2 is systematically investigated. Particular attention is given to the resulting functional properties of the films, including infrared shielding, optical appearance, and electrical conductivity. The Sb‐doped SnO2 (ATO) films exhibit a blue coloration originating from free‐carrier absorption associated with high electron concentrations, indicating degenerate doping. Such optical behavior is technologically attractive because it enables selective infrared absorption while preserving visible transparency. The bluish tint combined with strong infrared blocking makes these films promising for architectural and automotive glazing applications, where reduction of solar heat gain is required without compromising visible light transmission. Furthermore, the controllable optical tint and electrical conductivity make ATO films attractive for decorative coatings, electrochromic systems and other optoelectronic devices where both functionality and appearance are important. High visible transmittance combined with selective near‐infrared absorption therefore positions ATO as a promising candidate for energy‐efficient windows and optoelectronic applications.
In this study, SnCl4 and SbCl5 are used in combination as precursors to deposit ATO films by AACVD. While SnCl4 is widely used as an industrial precursor for the deposition of fluorine‐doped tin oxide (FTO) coatings via atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD), its use for the scalable AACVD deposition of ATO films has not previously been explored. The use of SbCl5 precursor enabled effective control of Sb5+ incorporation without contributions from Sb3+ species, providing improved control over optoelectronic properties. Previously, the use of antimony(III) ethoxide in combination with butyltin trichloride has been reported to produce ATO films containing mixed Sb5+ and Sb3+ oxidation states, which has been found to have a detrimental effect on the structural and functional properties of the films [21].
To optimize optoelectronic properties, SnO2 was doped with varying concentrations of antimony. The resulting doped SnO2 structure incorporated antimony in predominantely +5 state, contributing to the bluish coloration of the films. We demonstrate that films properties can be precisely controlled by varying dopant concentration and misting time. Our optimized ATO thin films exhibited significantly improved electrical and structural properties compared to the undoped SnO2.
Various techniques are used for depositing SnO2 thin films, including photochemical methods, sol‐gel processing, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), spin coating, dip coating, and spray pyrolysis. Among them, aerosol‐assisted chemical vapor deposition (AACVD) stands out as a superior technique due to its simplicity, scalability, and cost effectiveness. AACVD not only eliminates the requirement for highly volatile precursors, expanding the range of suitable materials, but also enables the deposition of uniform, and adhesive films with excellent control over dopant incorporation [22]. Furthermore, AACVD offers high growth rates and the capability to produce large‐area thin films, making it highly suitable for scalable deposition of functional coatings with industrial relevance [18].
2. Experimental Details
All chemicals were used as received without further purification: tin(IV) chloride (SnCl4; 99.995%, Sigma–Aldrich), antimony(V) chloride (SbCl5; 99.99%, Sigma–Aldrich), methanol (MeOH; 99.99% Fischer), and ethyl acetate (99.5%, Fischer Scientific). Compressed air was used as supplied by BOC. The glass substrate was 3.2 mm thick, plain float glass with a 50 nm thick SiO2 barrier layer, supplied by Pilkington NSG.
2.1. Synthesis
Depositions were carried out in a flat‐bed, cold‐walled tubular AACVD reactor, as described previously for related systems. A graphite block fitted with a Whatman cartridge heater and monitored by a Pt‐Rh thermocouple was positioned in the lower half of the reactor to control substrate temperature. Pilkington silica‐coated barrier glass (float glass with a 50 nm SiO2 layer on one side) was used as the substrate. The films were deposited on the coated side to suppress ion diffusion from the glass into the growing film. Substrates (15 cm × 4 cm) were cleaned with soapy water and isopropanol, then dried in an oven at 70°C. To maintain laminar aerosol flow and improve film uniformity, a second piece of barrier glass was suspended 5 mm above the substrate.
The precursor solution was prepared by dissolving 0.05 mL of SnCl4 and dopant amounts of SbCl5 in 14 mL of solvents (7 mL ethyl acetate + 7 mL methanol) in a glass bubbler. The Sb precursor concentration was varied by adding controlled volumes of SbCl5 to the SnCl4 solution. Specifically, 0.32, 0.97, 1.94, and 3.24 µL of SbCl5 were used to obtain ATO‐1, ATO‐2 (and ATO‐5), ATO‐3, and ATO‐4, respectively, corresponding to nominal Sb doping levels of 1, 3, 6, and 10 mol% relative to SnCl4 (Table 1). Aerosols were generated using a piezoelectric device and delivered into the reactor by compressed air at 1 L min−1. The substrate was heated to the deposition temperature (590°C) prior to deposition and cooled to room temperature before taking out the substrate for further analysis.
TABLE 1.
Precursor solution misting time, crystallite size, lattice parameters, antimony and chlorine content, O/Sn ratio (from XPS data), and the carrier mean free path of undoped and Sb‐doped SnO2 thin films prepared by AACVD.
| Film | Misting time (min) | Crystallite diameter (nm) | a/ Å (±0.001Å) | c/Å(±0.001Å) | Cl (at.%) | Sb (at.%) | O/Sn | Mean free path (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Undoped SnO2 | 05 | 28.1 ± 1.0 | 4.742 | 3.243 | 0.6 ± 0.02 | — | 1.7 ± 0.10 | 3.0 |
| ATO‐1 | 05 | 29.5 ± 1.3 | 4.750 | 3.197 | 0.6 ± 0.02 | 1.3 ± 0.01 | 1.6 ± 0.09 | 2.5 |
| ATO‐2 | 05 | 30.6 ± 1.5 | 4.745 | 3.196 | 0.8 ± 0.03 | 4.7 ± 0.02 | 1.7 ± 0.12 | 2.3 |
| ATO‐3 | 05 | 30.3 ± 1.7 | 4.754 | 3.199 | 0.7 ± 0.01 | 6.5 ± 0.03 | 1.8 ± 0.15 | 0.8 |
| ATO‐4 | 05 | 36.9 ± 0.9 | 4.749 | 3.195 | 0.7 ± 0.04 | 8.1 ± 0.02 | 1.5 ± 0.10 | 0.3 |
| ATO‐5 | 10 | 31.7 ± 2.0 | 4.748 | 3.199 | 0.6 ± 0.04 | 5.2 ± 0.01 | 1.9 ± 0.10 | 2.7 |
2.2. Analysis
Grazing‐incident x‐ray diffraction (GIXRD) was carried out on a Panalytical Empyrean diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) at 40 kV and 40 mA. The incident beam angle was fixed at 1°, and diffraction patterns were collected over 10°–70° in 0.05° steps at a rate of 0.5° s−1. Peak positions were assigned by comparison with reference data from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). The recorded patterns were analyzed for crystallinity and preferred orientation and plotted using OriginPro.
The diffraction peaks were analyzed using a Gaussian peak profile. The peak positions (2θ) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) values were obtained from the fitted peaks. The lattice parameters (a and c) were calculated from several diffraction peaks by applying Bragg's law together with the calculations for a tetragonal crystal structure. The uncertainties were estimated from the standard deviation of the values calculated from different reflections, giving an estimated uncertainty of ±0.001 Å. The unit cell volume was calculated using V = a 2 c, and the related uncertainty (±0.04 Å3) was determined using standard error propagation based on the lattice parameters.
The average crystallite size was estimated using the Scherrer equation, using the FWHM values obtained from the Gaussian‐fitted peaks. By considering uncertainties in the determination of peak width, the crystallite sizes were estimated to have an uncertainty of approximately ±10%.
X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on a Thermo Scientific spectrometer with a monochromatic Al Kα source. High‐resolution scans of the Sn 3d, Sb 3d, O 1s, and C 1s regions were acquired using a pass energy of 50 eV and a spot size of 400 µm. Spectra were fitted in Avantage software, with binding energies calibrated against the adventitious C 1s peak at 284.5 eV. The final modeled spectra were plotted using OriginPro. The core‐level spectra were fitted using a mixed Gaussian–Lorentzian peak shape, and the fitting procedure was carried out using the Powell optimization algorithm. A Smart background subtraction was applied before performing the fitting. The uncertainties in the XPS atomic percentages were estimated by repeating the peak fitting for spectra collected from three different areas of each sample.
Film morphology was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in top‐down mode using a JEOL JSM‐7600 field‐emission microscope operated at 5–15 kV. Prior to imaging, samples were carbon coated to improve contrast and ensure accurate EDS measurements. Energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to locate the presence of different elements present in the films with much focus on residual chlorine and Sb as dopant.
The film thicknesses were determined using the Bruker Dektak XT instrument, operating at room temperature. Film thickness was measured on a 1 × 1 cm area of each sample, and the electrical properties were measured on adjacent 1 cm × 1 cm areas to ensure accurate and representative electrical property data. From each 15 cm substrate, the first 2 cm section was used for thickness and electrical measurements, while the region between 3 and 6 cm was used for optical measurements to maintain consistency in the data.
Electrical properties were measured by Hall effect measurements using a four‐point probe in Van der Pauw geometry on an Ecopia HMS‐3000 setup. Recordings were performed on 1 × 1 cm2 samples with an applied current of 1 mA under a calibrated magnetic field of 0.58T. It provided the values of resistivity, mobility, and carrier concentration. Each sample was reproduced three times to ensure the reproducibility and reliability of the results. The error bars presented in Table 2 represent the standard deviations calculated from these three repeats.
TABLE 2.
Film thickness, electrical properties (including calculated sheet resistance and figure of merit), optical bandgap, transmittance at 550 nm and average transmittance in the visible (380–750 nm), near‐infrared (750–1400 nm), and short‐wave infrared (1400–2500 nm) ranges for SnO2 films and the TEC‐15 reference.
| Film | Film Thickness (± 50 nm) | Resistivity (Ω cm) | Mobility (cm2 V−1 s−1) | Carrier Conc. (cm−3) | Sheet Resistance (Ω □−1) | F.O.M. (Ω−1) | Bandgap (eV) | Tλ550 (%) | Tλ380‐750 (%) | Tλ750‐1400 (%) | Tλ1400‐2500 (%) | Haze (%)380–750 nm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Undoped SnO2 | 485 | 8.9 (±0.5) × 10−4 | 21.5 | 3.3 × 1020 | 18.4 | 4.6 × 10−3 | 3.93 (±0.03) | 78.1 (±0.6) | 78.3 | 82.3 | 72.0 | 2.7 |
| ATO‐1 | 619 | 9.8 (±0.5) × 10−4 | 17.0 | 3.8 × 1020 | 15.8 | 0.8 × 10−3 | 3.99 (±0.03) | 64.4 (±0.5) | 63.9 | 35.1 | 1.2 | 6.0 |
| ATO‐2 | 686 | 5.3 (±0.6) × 10−4 | 11.1 | 1.0 × 1021 | 7.7 | 2.4 × 10−3 | 4.0 (±0.01) | 67.0 (±0.5) | 64.7 | 37.7 | 1.3 | 5.5 |
| ATO‐3 | 743 | 1.3 (±0.3) × 10−3 | 3.7 | 1.3 × 1021 | 17.5 | 0.9 × 10−3 | 4.01 (±0.01) | 66.0 (±0.4) | 64.1 | 37.5 | 2.6 | 8.5 |
| ATO‐4 | 879 | 3.9 (±0.7) × 10−3 | 1.6 | 1.1 × 1021 | 44.4 | 0.01 × 10−3 | 4.02 (±0.01) | 46.7 (±0.3) | 44.4 | 15.0 | 0.14 | 6.0 |
| ATO‐5 | 920 | 2.0 (±0.4) × 10−4 | 8.5 | 3.6 × 1021 | 2.2 | 1.5 × 10−3 | 4.06 (±0.02) | 56.5 (±0.4) | 55.4 | 44.3 | 15.4 | 21.0 |
| TEC 15 | 340 | 4.5 × 10−4 | 34.0 | 4.0 × 1020 | 13.2 | 13.7 | 3.97 | 84.3 | 83.4 | 74.3 | 25.5 | — |
Optical properties were measured at room temperature using a Shimadzu UV–vis–NIR 3600i Plus spectrometer in the 200–2500 nm range. Bandgaps were derived from transmittance spectra (converted to absorbance) using Tauc plot method in OriginPro.
CIE L*a*b* color coordinates were calculated from the measured transmittance data under the CIE D65 illuminant using standard colorimetric calculations. The spectral power distribution of the CIE standard illuminant D65 and the CIE 1964 color‐matching functions (10° standard observer) were obtained from the International Commission on Illumination (CIE) database [23, 24]. Tristimulus values (X, Y, Z) were obtained by integrating the transmittance spectra with the CIE color matching functions and subsequently converted into L*, a*, and b* values using the standard nonlinear CIE transformation. The resulting color coordinates were plotted in OriginPro to visualize color evolution upon Sb‐doping.
Finally, static water contact angle measurements were carried out using a Krüss DSAE droplet shape analyzer employing the sessile drop method. Ultrapure water droplets with a volume of 5 µL were used under ambient conditions. The contact angles were determined from the recorded droplet images using the instrument's image analysis software.
3. Results and Discussion
Undoped and Sb‐doped SnO2 (ATO) thin films were deposited by AACVD on barrier glass substrates using SnCl4 and SbCl5 precursors dissolved in a mixed‐solvent system (7 mL ethyl acetate + 7 mL methanol). The Sb doping level was tuned across the series (ATO‐1 to ATO‐4) to yield increasing Sb contents, while maintaining the same deposition temperature and baseline misting duration of 05 min.
To evaluate the effect of deposition time or thickness independently of solution chemistry, ATO‐5 was prepared using the same precursor chemistry as ATO‐2 but with an extended misting duration of 10 min (Table 1). It enabled the assessment of how additional precursor delivery can influence microstructure and functional properties.
Residual chlorine was detected in the films by XPS, which is expected when using chlorine based precusrsors such as SnCl4 and SbCl5. No significant variation in chlorine content was observed with increasing Sb concentration and was therefore treated as a secondary factor affecting the electrical response.
All films showed excellent substrate coverage and strong adhesion (verified by the Scotch tape test), and remained stable in air with no measurable change in electrical properties over 14‐months period. The Sb‐doped SnO2 films appeared blue in coloration, with the tint becoming more pronounced at higher dopant levels. The strong near‐IR absorption can make the films an attractive choice for solar‐control or heat‐shielding glazing while retaining visible transparency.
A blue‐gray appearance is an established aesthetic in architectural glazing. For example, the triple‐silver low‐E product “Solarban 70 Optiblue” is specified to provide solar‐control performance while maintaining a steel blue‐gray visual tone [25]. It is also reported that Ag‐based low‐E coatings can be optically engineered for controlled tint, reinforcing that a slight blue or gray tone is compatible with high‐performance low‐E glazing applications [26].
The x‐ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the as‐deposited films (Figure 1) confirmed that the samples were phase‐pure and crystallized in the cassiterite structure of SnO2, characterized by a tetragonal rutile‐type lattice (space group P42/mnm). No secondary phases or impurity peaks were detected, indicating that high‐purity SnO2 films were obtained under the applied deposition conditions. The films exhibited a polycrystalline nature, with distinct diffraction peaks observed at 26.5°, 33.7°, 37.9°, 42.6°, 51.7°, 54.7°, 61.8°, 64.6°, and 65.9°, corresponding to the (110), (101), (200), (210), (211), (220), (310), (112), and (301) planes, respectively. These peaks were indexed to ICSD #1526637 (space group P42/mnm, a = b = 4.736 Å, c = 3.201 Å, V = 71.812 Å3), as shown in Figure 1.
FIGURE 1.

Collated XRD diffractograms of SnO2 and ATO films.
The crystallite sizes (D) were determined through the Scherrer formula [27], as shown in Equation 1:
| (1) |
The calculated unit cell parameters and crystallite sizes are listed in Table 1. No antimony oxide peaks were detected even at the highest dopant concentrations, suggesting that a solid solution (or a significant amorphous component) was successfully formed. The crystallite size of the ATO film was larger compared to the undoped film. This indicates improved crystal growth and nucleation, with reduced lattice distortion, which is beneficial for producing films with optimized carrier transport properties [28]. A similar broadening of XRD peaks with increasing antimony doping has also been reported by Krishnakumar et al. [29]. The undoped SnO2 film exhibited a crystallite size of 28.1 nm, which increased progressively upon Sb addition, reaching a maximum of 36.9 nm for ATO‐4. This trend suggests that Sb incorporation improved crystallinity and grain growth [30, 31].
By increasing the misting time of the precursor solution from 05 min (ATO‐2) to 10 min (ATO‐5), the crystallite size (shown in Table 1) increased from 30.6 to 31.7 nm. The availability of precursor species for longer time likely led to a higher rate of nucleation and growth and allowed existing crystallites to grow larger over the extended deposition period. This suggests that the misting time is a key parameter for controlling the final crystallite size and film thickness.
The variation of the lattice parameters with Sb incorporation was analyzed to assess the structural impact of doping. As shown in Table 1, the c value decreases from 3.243 Å in the undoped SnO2 film to ∼3.195 Å in ATO‐4. The contraction along the c‐axis upon Sb addition is consistent with substitutional incorporation of Sb5+ at Sn4+ lattice sites, given the comparable ionic radii of Sb5+ (∼0.60 Å) and Sn4+ (∼0.69 Å) in sixfold coordination, which allows incorporation without lattice expansion. In contrast, Sb3+ possesses a significantly larger ionic radius (∼0.76 Å), and its substitution is typically associated with lattice expansion. The observed decrease in the c parameter therefore further supports the incorporation of Sb predominantly in the +5 oxidation state, in agreement with the XPS analysis.
In thin films, growth can be anisotropic, meaning that certain crystal planes may grow faster or be more energetically favorable to align in a specific direction. To quantify this preferential orientation, texture coefficient (TC) values were calculated using Equation 2 [32]. A TC value greater than 1 for a particular (hkl) plane indicates a strong preferred orientation along that direction.
![]() |
(2) |
where Imeas. is the measured intensity of individual (hkl) plane reflection, Io is the theoretical intensity obtained from the ICSD data, and N is the total number of reflections included in calculation.
The electrical properties of ATO films can be influenced by their crystallographic orientation due to the intrinsic anisotropy of the cassiterite (rutile) structure. In rutile SnO2, the SnO6 octahedra share edges along the [001] direction (the c‐axis), forming linear chains that may facilitate charge transport due to orbital overlap along this axis. XRD analysis in this study revealed a preferred orientation along the (200) plane. In the tetragonal system, the [100] direction is normal to the (200) planes. Therefore, for (200)‐textured growth, the [001] direction (the c‐axis) lies within the plane of the film. All the films showed preferred orientation in (200) plane. The (200) plane is a low‐density plane believed to be associated with the presence of both oxygen vacancies and/or dopants. This specific plane is predicted to have fewer deep‐lying trap levels at grain boundary surfaces, which may contribute to a higher degree of conductivity across the film [33, 34, 35]. This geometrical alignment may be favorable for in‐plane charge transport, as it aligns the potentially more conductive crystallographic direction with the direction of electrical measurement. The (210) plane also showed TC values above 1 for all the samples. The TC values of (200) and (210) planes are shown in Figure S1. However, as the films are polycrystalline, electrical transport is not governed solely by crystallographic orientation but is also influenced by microstructural factors such as grain boundaries, defect states and dopant distribution.
X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to analyse the surface chemical composition, electronic states, and elemental quantification of the tin oxide films. The Sn 3d spectra of all samples are presented in Figure 2a. The binding energy of Sn 3d5/2 was observed in the range of 486.5–486.9 eV, consistent with the reported value for stoichiometric SnO2 (486.6 eV). The spin‐orbit splitting between Sn 3d5/2 and Sn 3d3/2 was 8.4 eV [36, 37]. No additional contributions associated with Sn(II), typically detected at slightly lower binding energy (∼486.0 eV), were identified [29].
FIGURE 2.

XPS spectra of (a) Sn 3d (b) Sb 3d.
Upon Sb doping, the Sn 3d core‐level peaks showed a positive shift of ∼0.1–0.2 eV relative to undoped SnO2. This shift can be attributed to the upward movement of the Fermi level caused by donor electrons introduced through Sb5+ substitution on Sn4+ lattice sites [38, 39], which increases the carrier concentration and reflects the enhanced n‐type conductivity of the films. The spin‐orbit splitting of the Sn 3d peaks remained unchanged, confirming that the chemical environment of tin is preserved.
The Sb 3d peak is superposed with that of O 1s, thus the deconvolution of the peaks was not straightforward. The Sb 3d and O 1s spectra exhibited complex features due to the overlapping of O1s and Sb 3d5/2 photoemission lines at around 531 eV [40]. Hence, spectral deconvolution was performed while accounting for spin‐orbit coupling, with the Sb 3d3/2 and Sb 3d5/2 area ratio set to 2:3 and the doublet splitting energy fixed at 9.3 eV. This method allowed for the independent quantification of the contributions from the Sb 3d and O 1s peaks. Moreover, the less intense 3d3/2 peak is an indicative of the presence of Sb in the films.
The Sb 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 peaks for Sb3+ are typically reported around 528.9 and 538.7 eV, respectively [41, 42]. However, Sb(V) peaks appear at slightly higher binding energies [43, 44, 45]. In the recorded Sb 3d spectra, no features attributable to Sb3+ were detected, and the observed doublet was therefore assigned to Sb5+. The contributions from O1s were deconvoluted into two components to determine the bonding states of different oxygens present in the samples. The first peak centered at approximately 530.7 eV was assigned to lattice oxygen corresponding to Sb─O bonds. Similar O 1s signals at approximately same binding energies have been previously reported and linked to the metal‐oxygen bond [41, 42, 46, 47, 48, 49]. However, the higher binding energy peak at around 532.3 eV was attributed to surface hydroxyl group (─OH) [36, 50]
A computational investigation using hybrid density functional theory (DFT) was performed by Sapna D. Ponja et al. to explore the role of intrinsic and Sb‐related defects in SnO2 [21]. In their study, ATO films deposited by AACVD were found to contain antimony in both Sb5+ and Sb3+ oxidation states, which was attributed to the use of an Sb(III) precursor (SbCl3). In contrast, the use of an Sb(V) precursor in the present work resulted exclusively in the incorporation of Sb5+ species within the films, thereby yielding improved electronic properties compared with previously reported AACVD‐derived ATO films [21, 51, 52].
The Cl 2p spectra (Figure 3) were analyzed to determine the chemical state of residual chlorine in the films. A weak and noisy doublet corresponding to the Cl 2p3/2 and Cl 2p1/2 components was observed, with the first peak located at approximately 198.7 eV. This position is consistent with chlorine in a chloride‐like environment, likely present as an impurity at grain boundaries or substituting for oxygen within the SnO2 lattice [36]. The spin‐orbit splitting of the Cl 2p doublet was determined to be 1.6 eV. Due to the low concentration of chlorine (<1 at.%), the Cl 2p signal was relatively weak. However, peak fitting was performed to quantify it, and a representative deconvoluted Cl 2p spectrum of ATO‐2 is provided in Figure S2.
FIGURE 3.

XPS spectra of Cl 2p.
Depth profiling of Sn 3d, Sb 3d, and Cl 2p for sample ATO‐2 was carried out up to four sputtering levels, with each level corresponding to 50 s etching (Figure 4). The chlorine concentration was highest at the surface (0.8 at.%) and gradually decreased with depth, measuring 0.7 at.% at the first etch level, 0.7 at.% at the second and third levels, and 0.5 at.% at the fourth level. This trend indicates a slight surface enrichment of chlorine with a relatively uniform distribution throughout the bulk of the film. The Sb concentration exhibited a similar depth profile, with 4.7 at.% at the surface gradually decreasing to 4.1 at.% at the fourth etch level. This suggests that the dopant was not predominantly surface segregated but rather quite uniformly distributed throughout the film.
FIGURE 4.

XPS depth profiling of ATO‐2 (a) Sn 3d (b) Sb 3d (c) Cl 2p.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to determine the surface morphology of the films. The SEM images, as shown in Figure 5, revealed noticeable changes in surface features with the changes in dopant concentration and misting time. The undoped SnO2 film showed compact surface morphology consisting of closely packed grains, which is characteristic of pure SnO2 [14, 15, 16, 53, 54]. The grain boundaries were quite defined, and no evidence of cracking or voids was observed. This showed homogeneous nucleation under the applied AACVD conditions.
FIGURE 5.

SEM and EDS images of (a) Undoped SnO2 (b) ATO‐1 (c) ATO‐2 (d) ATO‐3 (e) ATO‐4 (f) ATO‐5.
Upon introduction of Sb dopant at low to moderate concentrations (ATO‐1 to ATO‐3), the films noticeable increase in grain size and retained dense and continuous morphology. The grains appeared more faceted, suggesting enhanced surface diffusion and crystal growth promoted by Sb incorporation. The observed changes in grain growth agreed well with the changes in crystallite size observed under XRD. The improved carrier transport properties can be attributed to improved grain growth and reduced grain boundaries. Decrease in mobility can be attributed to ionized impurity scattering [55]. Such highly textured surface morphologies can be advantageous for TCO applications, such as solar cells, which benefit from improved light trapping and minimize reflection losses [17, 18, 35, 56, 57, 58, 59].
At higher Sb concentration (ATO‐4), the surface became more heterogeneous with smaller and irregularly shaped grains. The presence of poorly connected grains suggested that excessive Sb incorporation disrupted normal crystal growth. The effect of extended misting time is evident when comparing ATO‐2 and ATO‐5. Despite similar solution chemistry, ATO‐5 showed larger grains. The prolonged supply of precursor allowed sustained grain growth, resulting in improved inter‐grain connectivity. Importantly, SEM confirmed that thickness‐related improvements in conductivity arise from microstructural evolution rather than increased defect density, which would otherwise compromise optical performance.
Energy‐dispersive x‐ray spectroscopy (EDS) mapping performed alongside SEM indicated a relatively uniform distribution of Sb across the film surface. This observation is consistent with the XRD and XPS results, suggesting that Sb is relatively uniformly distributed throughout the film. Such relatively uniform dopant distribution is beneficial for achieving consistent electrical properties across large‐area films and highlights the effectiveness of AACVD for controlled dopant incorporation.
The optical properties of the SnO2 films were determined using UV–vis spectroscopy. The transmittance and reflectance spectra of all the samples are shown in Figure 6. The optical transmittance of undoped and ATO films at 550 nm and average values across the visible (380–750 nm), near‐infrared (750–1400 nm), and short‐wave (1400–2500 nm) regions are shown in Table 2. The transmittance and reflectance spectra of commercial FTO (TEC‐15, NSG Pilkington), and uncoated float glass are shown in Figure S3. TEC‐15 showed a transmittance of 84.3% at 550 nm, as shown in Table 2.
FIGURE 6.

Transmittance (T) and reflectance (R) spectra of undoped SnO2 and ATO samples.
The doped films exhibited lower transmittance compared to the undoped SnO2 film (Figure 6). The transmittance Tλ550 was found to decrease from 64.4% to 46.7% as the doping concentration increased from 1.3 at.% to 8.1 at.%. As the doping concentration increased, the films exhibited a stronger blue coloration, a characteristic widely noted in Sb‐doped SnO2 films [60, 61, 62]. Several explanations have been proposed to account for this observation in relation to the opto‐electronic properties of the films. One explanation is that increasing the Sb doping concentration results in a higher number of excitable electrons, which is attributed to the greater presence of Sb5+ [62].
Upon Sb‐doping, the most pronounced changes occurred in the near‐infrared (NIR,750‐1400 nm) and short‐wave infrared (SWIR, 1400–2500 nm) regions and were attributed to free‐carrier absorption (Drude effect) [2, 63]. Undoped SnO2 showed Tλ750‐1400 of 82.3%, but Sb doping reduced it to 35%–38% in ATO‐1 to ATO‐3 and to only 15% in ATO‐4. A similar trend was observed in the SWIR region, where undoped SnO2 transmitted 72.0% in Tλ1400‐2500, while ATO‐4 transmitted only 0.14%, effectively blocking most of the infrared. Such strong infrared absorption is a characteristic of functional TCO materials and is desirable in solar‐control and heat‐shielding coatings.
The film deposited using the same solution chemistry as ATO‐2 but with a longer misting time (ATO‐5, 10 min) exhibited a reduced transmittance at 550 nm (Tλ550 = 56.5%). This decrease can be attributed to the combined effects of increased film thickness, enhanced light scattering, and stronger free‐carrier absorption. In the NIR and SWIR regions, ATO‐5 transmitted more light (44.3% and 15.4%, respectively) than the heavily doped ATO‐4, reinforcing that both dopant concentration and film thickness critically determine the spectral selectivity of ATO films. ATO‐1‐ATO‐4 showed SWIR transmittance of <3% and hence they can find applications in heat‐mirror coatings or heat‐shielding glazing where SWIR blocking is desired [64].
The pronounced ultraviolet absorption observed in all films highlights their potential for use as functional coatings in smart windows and display panels, where they can provide protection to sensitive materials and human eyes against harmful UV radiation [65].
The Percent Haze Was Calculated by Using Equation 3 [66]
| (3) |
The haze spectra of all films are shown in Figure 7, and the average haze values in the visible region (380–750 nm) are listed in Table 2. The haze values were found to increase upon Sb doping, with a noticeable rise in haze as the Sb concentration in the films increased. Similar increases in optical haze or diffuse scattering with increasing Sb incorporation have been reported for ATO thin films and are attributed to enhanced light scattering arising from dopant‐induced microstructural distortion [66, 67]. ATO‐2 exhibited a haze value of 5.5%, whereas its thicker analogue, ATO‐5, showed a significantly higher haze value of 21%. An increase in haze with thickness has been previously reported [66]. Overall, ATO‐1 to ATO‐4 films exhibited haze values below 10%, indicating that the films preserved optical clarity alongside infrared shielding, which is a key requirement for low‐emissivity architectural glazing where minimal visual distortion and effective solar control are essential [67].
FIGURE 7.

Haze spectra of undoped SnO2 and ATO samples.
The color evolution of the films with Sb‐concentration and the corresponding chromaticity coordinates are shown in Figure 8. The details of the calculations are provided in the Supporting Information. The undoped film exhibited a nearly neutral appearance, whereas Sb incorporation resulted in a systematic shift toward negative b* values, indicating the development of a bluish tint. The color positions and corresponding lightness values for each sample are provided in Figure S4, which further illustrate the gradual bluish darkening of the films with Sb‐concentration.
FIGURE 8.

CIE chromaticity diagram showing the color coordinates (a* and b*) of undoped SnO2 and ATO films.
ATO‐2 and ATO‐5 showed similar a* and b* values despite the greater thickness of ATO‐5, indicating that the blue coloration was primarily governed by Sb concentration rather than film thickness. In contrast, the lower L* value of ATO‐5 (Figure S4) showed that increased thickness mainly influenced the film lightness, resulting in a darker appearance without significantly altering chromaticity. Overall, these results suggested that the blue coloration of the films can be effectively tuned by changing the Sb concentration.
The optical bandgap (Eg) values were calculated using the Tauc method [68], and shown in Figure 9. In this method, the linear region of a plot of (αhν)2 versus Energy Eg (eV) near the high‐energy absorption edge was extrapolated to the x‐axis to provide an estimate of the bandgap energy. In the given Tauc method (Equation 4) [68], α represents the linear absorption coefficient, A is a constant, and hν denotes the photon energy, where h is Planck's constant and ν is the frequency of the incident light.
| (4) |
FIGURE 9.

Tauc plots of undoped SnO2 and ATO samples.
The optical bandgap of the undoped SnO2 film was determined to be 3.93 eV, which is consistent with reported values for polycrystalline SnO2 [53, 54]. Upon Sb‐doping, a widening of the bandgap was observed with values ranging from 3.99 to 4.06 eV across the doped films. This suggests the influence of the donor levels of dopant in inducing degenerate semi‐conductivity and widening the optical bandgap, as explained by the Moss‐Burstein effect, where the filling of lower conduction band levels leads to an increase in the bandgap [3, 69].
For instance, ATO‐1 and ATO‐2 exhibited bandgaps of 3.99 and 4.0 eV, respectively, consistent with their increased carrier concentrations (3.8 × 1020 and 1.0 × 1021 cm−3). The effect was most evident in ATO‐5, which showed the widest bandgap (4.06 eV). Despite having only moderate transmittance at 550 nm (56.5%), this film showed high crystallinity and the highest charge carrier concentration (3.6 × 1021 cm−3).
Hall Effect measurements at room temperature were performed in the Van der Pauw configuration on the most conductive areas of all tested films to evaluate their electrical conductivity. The results are presented in Table 2. The negative Hall coefficient values confirmed the n‐type conductivity of the films. It is well known that the physical properties of oxides are strongly influenced by deviations from stoichiometric composition (native disorder) and by the nature and concentration of foreign atoms incorporated into the crystal lattice.
The films were stored in air under ambient conditions for 15 months, during which no noticeable degradation or measurable changes in electrical properties were observed. The films (ATO‐1 and ATO‐2) were subjected to 20 cycles of Scotch tape testing, and no visible edge peeling, delamination, or surface damage was detected. Electrical measurements carried out after the tape tests showed no measurable change in resistivity, indicating that the electrical performance of the films was maintained. In addition, the films showed good resistance to mechanical damage during manual scratching tests performed using a stainless‐steel spatula.
Since tin oxide is an n‐type semiconductor, oxygen vacancies (Vo) or interstitial tin atoms (Sni) are expected to act as donors in pure SnO2 [70, 71]. The SnO2 films appeared to be oxygen‐deficient (Table 1). According to the literature, the formation of oxygen vacancies on the surface and/or subsurface regions of the growing SnO2 occurs under the applied deposition conditions, specifically at a high temperature of above 500°C [72].
The undoped SnO2 film exhibited a resistivity of 8.9 × 10−4 Ω cm, mobility of 21.5 cm2 V−1 s−1, and carrier concentration of 3.3 × 1020 cm−3. This low resistivity for undoped SnO2 is comparable to that of doped SnO2 films, as shown in Table 3 [8, 9, 73, 74]. However, similarly low resistivity values of the same order of magnitude have also been reported in the literature for Undoped SnO2 films deposited by other deposition methods [10, 11, 12, 13].
TABLE 3.
Optoelectronic properties of Sb‐doped SnO2 films previously reported using Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) methods.
| Deposition Method | Resistivity (Ω cm) | Mobility (cm2 V−1 s−1) | Carrier Conc. (cm−3) | Transmittance (%) | Thick ness (nm) | Bandgap (eV) | Sheet Resistance (Ω □−1) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOCVD a | 1.3 × 10−3 | 9.0 | 2.5 × 1020 | 80 | 150 | 4.11 | — | [16] |
| AACVD | 4.7 × 10−4 | 11.4 | 1.2 × 1021 | 65 | 525 | — | 9.0 | [53] |
| AACVD | 1.0 × 10−3 | — | — | 70 | 30 | — | 105 | [52] |
| MOCVD | 7.63 × 10−4 | 19.9 | 4.1 × 1020 | 80 | — | — | — | [54] |
| Mist CVD | 9.72 × 10−4 | 8.0 | 1 × 1021 | 95 | 220 | 4.41 | 44.1 | [15] |
| Mist CVD | 6.58 × 10−4 | 2.9 | 3.2 × 1021 | 90 | 190 | 4.22 | 34.6 | [51] |
| APCVD a | 3.38 × 10−2 | 23.5 | 7.7 × 1017 | 44 | 320 | 3.74 | 1056 | [14] |
MOCVD—Metal‐organic CVD, APCVD—Atmospheric Pressure CVD.
Upon Sb‐doping, the electrical properties were strongly modified reflecting an interplay between enhanced donor density and increased carrier scattering [21]. Resistivity decreased at moderate Sb levels, reaching 5.3 × 10−4 Ω cm in ATO‐2. This trend is driven by a substantial increase in carrier concentration from 3.2 × 1020 cm−3 (undoped) to 1.0 × 1021 cm−3 (ATO‐2), while mobility declined from 23.0 to 11.1 cm2 V−1 s−1. A further increase in carrier concentration was achieved for ATO‐3 (1.3 × 1021 cm−3). However, a pronounced reduction in mobility to 3.7 cm2 V−1 s−1 led to an increased resistivity of 1.3 × 10−3 Ω cm, indicating the onset of scattering.
To assess the contribution of grain‐boundary scattering, the carrier mean free path was estimated from the Hall carrier concentration and resistivity data (see Supporting Information for detailed calculations) [75]. The calculated carrier mean free paths ranged from 0.34 to 3.03 nm, substantially smaller than the corresponding crystallite sizes of 28.1–36.9 nm (Table 1). This indicates that charge carriers undergo multiple scattering events within individual crystallites before reaching a grain boundary. Therefore, grain‐boundary scattering is unlikely to be the dominant mobility‐limiting mechanism in these films. Instead, the reduction in mobility with increasing Sb concentration is consistent with enhanced scattering arising from ionized impurities and structural disorder associated with heavy doping [75].
At higher Sb concentrations, carrier scattering effects became dominant. ATO‐4, containing the highest Sb content, exhibited a severely reduced mobility of 1.6 cm2 V−1 s−1 and a correspondingly high resistivity of 3.9 × 10−3 Ω cm, despite maintaining a high carrier concentration of 1.1 × 1021 cm−3. This behavior highlighted the detrimental impact of excessive dopant incorporation, where defect‐induced scattering and microstructural disorder outweighed the benefits of increased charge carriers. This behavior is further shown in Figure 10, which shows the relationship between carrier concentration and mobility for the undoped and ATO films. A clear inverse trend is observed, where mobility decreases with increasing carrier concentration. As Sb5+ incorporation introduces additional free electrons, it simultaneously increases the density of charged scattering centers, limiting carrier mobility. At higher doping levels, this effect becomes dominant, indicating that further increases in carrier concentration do not translate into improved electrical performance due to enhanced scattering and possible microstructural disorder.
FIGURE 10.

Mobility vs. carrier concentration for undoped SnO2 and ATO films.
Similar trends of resistivity decreasing at moderate Sb doping and increasing at higher concentrations have been widely reported [14, 15, 16, 21]. These resistivity values are also lower than those of Sb:SnO2 films reported via spray pyrolysis using the same tin precursor (SnCl4) [9, 73]. The electronic properties of Sb:SnO2 films previously reported using CVD methods, as shown in Table 3 [14, 15, 16, 51, 54].
Sheet resistance reflects the balance between resistivity and film thickness. The undoped film (463 nm) showed a sheet resistance of 18.4 Ω □− 1, while ATO‐2 (686 nm) showed a significantly reduced value of 7.7 Ω □− 1, reflecting its improved electrical conductivity. These values are lower than those reported in the literature [9, 21, 73]. A noticeable thickness effect was evident for ATO‐5, which was deposited using the same solution chemistry as ATO‐2 but with extended misting time. Despite similar Sb doping levels, the increased thickness of 920 nm resulted in a very low sheet resistance of 2.2 Ω □− 1, combined with a high carrier concentration of 3.6 × 1021 cm−3 and a low resistivity of 2.0 × 10−4 Ω cm. Similar results for F‐doped tin oxide films are reported [35].
Residual chlorine and oxygen stoichiometry also played important roles. XPS analysis revealed chlorine contents between 0.6 and 0.8 at.%. Chlorine in SnO2 can occupy two possible states: (i) substitutional Cl− at oxygen sites, where it can act as a shallow donor analogous to fluorine [36], and (ii) grain‐boundary or adsorbed chloride species, which introduce charged centers that scatter carriers [76].
In the present series, the chlorine levels are relatively low and with narrow range but still show correlations with mobility trends. For example, ATO‐2 contained ∼0.8 at.% Cl, coinciding with a reduction in mobility to 11.1 cm2 V−1 s−1, despite its favorable carrier density (1.0 × 1021 cm−3). In contrast, ATO‐5, with ∼0.6 at.% Cl, achieved the highest electron concentration (3.6 × 1021 cm−3) and one of the lowest sheet resistances, consistent with reduced scattering at lower chlorine levels. Therefore, chlorine was regarded as a secondary but non‐negligible contributor to the electrical response.
In a previous study on optimization of undoped SnO2 films, the level of chlorine incorporation was systematically investigated and controlled by varying deposition parameters such as solvent composition and deposition temperature [77]. In the present study, all depositions were carried out at a relatively high temperature (590°C) using optimized solvent ratios. Under these conditions, chlorine was consistently detected at levels below 1 at.% in all films and was not observed to vary with Sb doping. Therefore, the chlorine concentration in both undoped and doped films remained effectively constant, and the observed changes in optoelectronic properties upon doping are primarily attributed to Sb incorporation. These results indicated that antimony was incorporated into SnO2 films that already contained residual chlorine originating from the chloride precursor. Notably, the chlorine concentration did not increase significantly upon the introduction of SbCl5 as the dopant precursor, suggesting that the residual chlorine present in the films predominantly originated from the SnCl4 precursor. Similar observations are previously reported by Messad et al. for Sb‐doped SnO2 films deposited using SnCl4 and SbCl3 precursors, where residual chlorine incorporation was attributed to the SnCl4 source [78]. The presence of residual chlorine in SnO2 films deposited using SnCl4‐based precursors has been widely reported in the literature [79, 80].
Similarly, the O/Sn ratio provides insight into the role of oxygen vacancies. All the films were found to be oxygen deficient, as shown in Table 1. The low resistivity of SnO2 films due to oxygen vacancies has been widely reported in the literature [71, 81, 82, 83]. Mukhamedshina et al. reported a decrease in surface resistance when films were treated with hydrogen plasma, attributing this effect to the presence of oxygen vacancies [81]. The lowest O/Sn ratio (1.5 in ATO‐4) corresponded to high carrier density but also the strongest mobility degradation. However, the relatively oxygen‐rich ATO‐5 (O/Sn = 1.9) still achieved the highest carrier concentration, which reinforced that Sb5+ substitution as the dominant donor mechanism.
Superior transport properties such as high carrier concentration are often achieved at the cost of reduced optical transmittance. To assess the optoelectronic performance of TCO materials the figure of merit (F.O.M.) proposed by Haacke in 1976 [84] was employed in this study. The F.O.M. (Φ) is defined in Equation 5.
| (5) |
ATO‐2 showed a favorable balance between conductivity and visible transmittance, yielding a F.O.M. of 2.4 × 10−3 Ω−1. ATO‐4 showed a drastically reduced F.O.M. of 0.01 × 10−3 Ω−1, primarily due to its poor optical transmittance and high sheet resistance. However, ATO‐5 achieved an enhanced F.O.M. of 1.5 × 10−3 Ω−1, demonstrating that thickness‐driven conductivity enhancement can partially recover optoelectronic performance. Overall, Sb5+ doping is the principal driver of conductivity improvement in these films, while chlorine and oxygen stoichiometry modulate scattering and compensation effects. The comparison between ATO‐2 and its thicker analogue ATO‐5 showed that thickness can be used as an effective parameter to further reduce sheet resistance. The reproducibility of the films was verified by preparing samples (Undoped SnO2 , ATO‐1 and ATO‐4) three times, which consistently yielded nearly consistent electrical properties and film thickness.
The electronic properties of the films presented in this work are comparable to those of Sb‐doped SnO2 films previously reported using CVD methods, as shown in Table 3 [14, 15, 16, 53, 54]. This comparison was further extended by comparing the F.O.M. of the films deposited in this study with previously reported ATO films deposited by AACVD (Figure 11a), and by comparing the sheet resistance and film thickness of films from this study with ATO films reported in the literature that were deposited using SnCl4 as a precursor (Figure 11b). The F.O.M. comparison was not possible in Figure 11b, as most literature reports did not explicitly state transmittance values.
FIGURE 11.

Comparison of the performance of ATO films prepared in this work with previously reported literature: (a) Comparison of the F.O.M of films from this study with ATO films deposited via AACVD reported in the literature (b) Comparison of sheet resistance as a function of film thickness for films from this study and literature ATO films deposited using SnCl4 as a precursor. (references: AACVD L‐1 [21], AACVD L‐2 [52] and L‐1 [85], L‐2 [86], L‐3 [87], L‐4 [88], and L‐5 [89]).
As shown in Figure 11a, the F.O.M. for ATO‐2 (this study) was higher than that reported for ATO films deposited via AACVD. This enhanced performance can be attributed to the combination of low sheet resistance and moderate optical transmittance, indicating efficient carrier transport without significant optical loss. The remaining films (ATO‐1, ATO‐3, ATO‐4 and ATO‐5) showed F.O.M. values comparable to those reported in the AACVD literature.
Literature reports on ATO films deposited using SnCl4 as a precursor (Figure 11b) showed a wide distribution of sheet resistance values over a broad thickness range. The films prepared in this work occupied a region of comparable or lower sheet resistance, indicating efficient electrical transport without the need for significantly thicker films. Notably, ATO‐2 and ATO‐5 achieved the lowest sheet resistance values while maintaining moderate thickness, suggesting improved film continuity and carrier transport properties. Overall, the results suggest that precursor chemistry, deposition conditions and tuning of dopant concentration enabled the fabrication of ATO films with optimized optoelectronic performance.
Overall, the results demonstrate that the deposition conditions employed in this study enable the fabrication of ATO films with competitive optoelectronic performance relative to previously reported AACVD and SnCl4‐derived ATO films. The observed improvements highlight the effectiveness of the present growth approach in achieving a favorable trade‐off between conductivity and transparency, which is essential for transparent conducting oxide applications.
The sheet resistance of the deposited films is also compared with reported ATO films deposited via the widely used sputtering technique, as shown in Figure 12. The AACVD‐deposited films prepared in this work are shown to exhibit sheet resistance values that are comparable to those reported for sputtered ATO films. Lower sheet resistance values are achieved for ATO‐2 and ATO‐5 compared to the sputtered films included in this study. These results indicate that ATO films with electrical performance comparable to, and in some cases superior to, sputtered films can be produced via AACVD.
FIGURE 12.

Comparison of sheet resistance for sputtered ATO films reported in the literature (Sp. L1 [90] Sp. L2 [91], Sp. L3 [92], Sp. L4 [93], Sp. L5 [94], Sp. L6 [95], and Sp. L7 [96]) and AACVD‐deposited ATO films from this work.
The static water contact angle (WCA) measurements showed a pronounced wettability shift upon Sb‐doping, as shown in Figure 13. The undoped SnO2 showed borderline hydrophobicity (93°), whereas all Sb‐doped films were hydrophilic. A similar decrease in the WCA of SnO2 films upon Sb doping has been reported previously [97]. From ATO‐1 to ATO‐4 the WCA decreased progressively from 51° to 30°. This behavior is consistent with Sb‐driven modification of the surface defect chemistry i.e. XPS O 1s deconvolution identified a higher binding energy contribution assigned to surface hydroxyl groups (─OH). Hydroxylated or polar surfaces has already been reported to increase the wettability [98]. Within this sample set, the strongest hydrophilicity was observed for ATO‐4 (WCA 30°), which is also the most heavily doped film by XPS (Sb = 8.1 at.%). It also exhibited the lowest O/Sn ratio (1.5), i.e., the greatest oxygen deficiency among the series. Oxygen‐deficient oxide surfaces promote dissociative adsorption of water and stabilization of hydroxyl species, which increases the polar component of the surface energy and lowers WCA [99].
FIGURE 13.

Water contact angle (WCA) images of undoped and Sb‐doped SnO2 samples.
ATO‐2 and ATO‐5 exhibited nearly identical WCAs (48° and 50°, respectively), suggesting that increasing misting time did not significantly modify the surface wettability. This further suggested that the wetting behavior was governed primarily by the surface chemistry rather than by bulk thickness. Previously, it has been reported that variations in film thickness do not significantly affect the WCA [100].
4. Conclusions
Antimony‐doped SnO2 thin films were deposited by AACVD and systematically characterized for their structural, electrical, and optical performance. X‐ray diffraction confirmed crystallization in the cassiterite SnO2 phase without secondary phases, demonstrating successful incorporation of Sb into the lattice. Moderate Sb doping significantly enhanced electrical conductivity, with ATO‐2 showed a resistivity of 5.3 × 10−4 Ω cm, a carrier concentration of 1.0 × 1021 cm−3, and a mobility of 11.1 cm2 V−1 s−1, reflecting effective activation of Sb5+ donors. At higher Sb concentrations, increased ionized impurity and grain‐boundary scattering reduced mobility and electrical performance despite high carrier densities. XPS revealed residual chlorine (<1 at.%), which contributed both shallow donor states and charged scattering centers, while oxygen vacancies acted as additional intrinsic donors. Film thickness was identified as an important parameter for electrical optimization, as ATO‐5 achieved a low resistivity of 2.0 × 10−4 Ω cm and a sheet resistance of 2.2 Ω □−1 through extended deposition time without excessive Sb incorporation. Optical measurements showed acceptable visible transparency, low haze values (<10% for ATO‐1 to ATO‐4) indicating preserved optical clarity accompanied by pronounced infrared blocking due to free‐carrier absorption and tuneable blue‐grey tint. CIE Lab colorimetric analysis further confirmed a gradual shift toward negative b values with increasing Sb concentration, demonstrating tuneable blue colouration governed primarily by dopant incorporation. These combined properties demonstrate that AACVD deposited ATO films are promising multifunctional coatings for low‐emissivity and solar‐control architectural glazing, infrared heat‐shielding windows, transparent electrodes and other energy‐efficient optoelectronic applications.
Author Contributions
Iqra Ramzan prepared and characterized the samples and contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript. Claire Carmalt and Ivan Parkin supervised the project and contributed to writing and editing. All authors participated in scientific discussions throughout the study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Supporting File: advs76476‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Acknowledgements
Iqra Ramzan is thankful for the funding received for this research from NSG Pilkington Glass Ltd. and UCL Dean's prize. A part of this work was also supported by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (Grant Number: EP/W010798/1). The authors would also like to thank NSG Pilkington Glass Ltd. for providing glass substrates for research conducted in this work. Thanks to Jamie Gould for the valuable discussions and insights on XRD.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. Minami T., “Transparent Conducting Oxide Semiconductors for Transparent Electrodes,” Semiconductor Science and Technology 20, no. 4 (2005): S35–S44, 10.1088/0268-1242/20/4/004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ellmer K., “Past Achievements and Future Challenges in the Development of Optically Transparent Electrodes,” Nature Photonics 6, no. 12 (2012): 809–817, 10.1038/nphoton.2012.282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Noor N. and Parkin I. P., “Enhanced Transparent‐conducting Fluorine‐Doped Tin Oxide Films Formed by Aerosol‐assisted Chemical Vapour Deposition,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 1, no. 5 (2013): 984–996, 10.1039/C2TC00400C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Durrani S., Khawaja E., Al‐Shukri A., and Al‐Kuhaili M., “Dielectric/Ag/Dielectric Coated Energy‐Efficient Glass Windows for Warm Climates,” Energy and Buildings 36, no. 9 (2004): 891–898, 10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Shao D., Gao J., Xin G., et al., “Cl‐Doped ZnO Nanowire Arrays on 3d Graphene Foam With Highly Efficient Field Emission and Photocatalytic Properties,” Small 11, no. 36 (2015): 4785–4792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ramzan I., Borowiec J., Parkin I. P., and Carmalt C. J., “Transparent Conductive Titanium and Fluorine Co‐Doped Zinc Oxide Films,” ChemPlusChem 89 (2024): 202400073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chen N., Ramzan I., Li S., and Carmalt C. J., “Synthesis and Characterization of Optically Transparent and Electrically Conductive Mo‐Doped ZnO, F‐Doped ZnO, and Mo/F‐codoped ZnO Thin Films via Aerosol‐Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Crystal Growth & Design (2024): 10256–10266, 10.1021/acs.cgd.4c01238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Moholkar A., Pawar S., Rajpure K., and Bhosale C., “Effect of Concentration of SnCl4 on Sprayed Fluorine Doped Tin Oxide Thin Films,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 455, no. 1‐2 (2008): 440–446, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.01.160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Esro M., Georgakopoulos S., Lu H., et al., “Solution Processed SnO2: Sb Transparent Conductive Oxide as an Alternative to Indium Tin Oxide for Applications in Organic Light Emitting Diodes,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 4, no. 16 (2016): 3563–3570, 10.1039/C5TC04117A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Lee D.‐K., Wan Z., Bae J.‐S., et al., “Plasma‐enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition of SnO2 Thin Films Using SnCl4 and O2 Plasma,” Materials Letters 166 (2016): 163–166, 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.12.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Koutsogianni A. and Tsamakis D., “Tin Oxide APCVD Thin Films Grown by SnCl4 Oxidation on Glass and Si Substrates in a Cold Wall Reactor,” Le Journal de Physique IV 11, no. PR3 (2001): Pr3–377. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wu X., Sheldon P., Coutts T., Rose D., Mulligan W., and Moutinho H., “Cds/Cdte Thin‐Film Devices Using a Cd2 SnO4 Transparent Conducting Oxide,” in AIP Conference Proceedings (American Institute of Physics, 1997), 693–702, 10.1063/1.52871. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Gordillo G., Moreno L., De la Cruz W., and Teheran P., “Preparation and Characterization of SnO2 Thin Films Deposited by Spray Pyrolysis from SnCl2 and SnCl4 Precursors,” Thin Solid Films 252, no. 1 (1994): 61–66, 10.1016/0040-6090(94)90826-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fadavieslam M. and Sadra S., “Dependence of O2 and Ar2 Flow Rates on the Physical Properties of ATO Thin Films Deposited by Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition (APCVD),” Applied Physics A 123, no. 11 (2017): 716, 10.1007/s00339-017-1229-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Liu L., Kawaharamura T., Dang G. T., et al., “Study on Fabrication of Conductive Antimony Doped Tin Oxide Thin Films (SnOx: Sb) by 3rd Generation Mist Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 58, no. 2 (2019): 025502, 10.7567/1347-4065/aaf4b6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Luan C., Zhu Z., Mi W., and Ma J., “Effect of Sb Doping on Structural, Electrical and Optical Properties of Epitaxial SnO2 Films Grown on R‐Cut Sapphire,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 586 (2014): 426–430, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.10.087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ponja S. D., Sathasivam S., Parkin I. P., and Carmalt C. J., “Highly Conductive and Transparent Gallium Doped Zinc Oxide Thin Films via Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Scientific Reports 10, no. 1 (2020): 638, 10.1038/s41598-020-57532-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Potter D. B., Powell M. J., Darr J. A., Parkin I. P., and Carmalt C. J., “Transparent Conducting Oxide Thin Films of Si‐Doped ZnO Prepared by Aerosol Assisted CVD,” RSC Advances 7, no. 18 (2017): 10806–10814, 10.1039/C6RA27748A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Dixon S. C., Sathasivam S., Williamson B. A., Scanlon D. O., Carmalt C. J., and Parkin I. P., “Transparent Conducting n‐Type ZnO:Sc—Synthesis, Optoelectronic Properties and Theoretical Insight,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 5, no. 30 (2017): 7585–7597, 10.1039/C7TC02389H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kaushik V. K., Mukherjee C., Ganguli T., and Sen P., “Material Characterizations of Al: ZnO Thin Films Grown by Aerosol Assisted Chemical Vapour Deposition,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 689 (2016): 1028–1036, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ponja S. D., Williamson B. A., Sathasivam S., Scanlon D. O., Parkin I. P., and Carmalt C. J., “Enhanced Electrical Properties of Antimony Doped Tin Oxide Thin Films Deposited via Aerosol Assisted Chemical Vapour Deposition,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 6, no. 27 (2018): 7257–7266, 10.1039/C8TC01929K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Marchand P., Hassan I. A., Parkin I. P., and Carmalt C. J., “Aerosol‐Assisted Delivery of Precursors for Chemical Vapour Deposition: Expanding the Scope of CVD for Materials Fabrication,” Dalton Transactions 42, no. 26 (2013): 9406–9422, 10.1039/c3dt50607j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. CIE 2019, CIE standard illuminant D65, International Commission on Illumination (CIE), Vienna, AT, 10.25039/CIE.DS.hjfjmt59. [DOI]
- 24. CIE 2019, CIE 1964 colour‐matching functions, 10 degree observer, International Commission on Illumination (CIE), Vienna, AT, 10.25039/CIE.DS.sqksu2n5. [DOI]
- 25. Vitro Architectural Glass. Solarban® 70 Optiblue® Solar Control Low‐E Glass, Available online: https://www.vitroglazings.com/products/low‐e‐glass/solarban‐70‐optiblue‐glass/.
- 26. Wu J., Qian X., Liu C., Ji Y., and Yu S., “Design and Realization of Neutral‐Tinted Low‐e Film,” Vacuum 203 (2022): 111228, 10.1016/j.vacuum.2022.111228. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Cullity B. D., Elements of X‐ray Diffraction (Addison‐Wesley Publishing, 1956). [Google Scholar]
- 28. Ma T., Missous M., Pinter G., et al., “Sustainable Ito Films With Reduced Indium Content Deposited by AACVD,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 10, no. 2 (2022): 579–589, 10.1039/D1TC04864C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Krishnakumar T., Jayaprakash R., Pinna N., Phani A., Passacantando M., and Santucci S., “Structural, Optical and Electrical Characterization of Antimony‐substituted Tin Oxide Nanoparticles,” Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 70, no. 6 (2009): 993–999, 10.1016/j.jpcs.2009.05.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Joshi G., Rajput J. K., and Purohit L., “Improved Stability of Gas Sensor by Inclusion of sb in Nanostructured SnO2 Thin Films Grown on Sodalime,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 830 (2020): 154659, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154659. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Feng Z., Gaiardo A., Valt M., et al., “Investigation on Sensing Performance of Highly Doped Sb/SnO2 ,” Sensors 22, no. 3 (2022): 1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Joseph D. P., Saravanan M., Muthuraaman B., et al., “Spray Deposition and Characterization of Nanostructured Li Doped Nio Thin Films for Application in Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells,” Nanotechnology 19, no. 48 (2008): 485707, 10.1088/0957-4484/19/48/485707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Belanger D., Dodelet J., Lombos B., and Dickson J., “Thickness Dependence of Transport Properties of Doped Polycrystalline Tin Oxide Films,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 132, no. 6 (1985): 1398–1405, 10.1149/1.2114132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Amanullah F., Pratap K., and Babu V. H., “Compositional Analysis and Depth Profile Studies on Undoped and Doped Tin Oxide Films Prepared by Spray Technique,” Materials Science and Engineering: B 52, no. 2‐3 (1998): 93–98, 10.1016/S0921-5107(98)00113-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Bhachu D. S., Waugh M. R., Zeissler K., Branford W. R., and Parkin I. P., “Textured Fluorine‐Doped Tin Dioxide Films Formed by Chemical Vapour Deposition,” Chemistry—A European Journal 17, no. 41 (2011): 11613–11621, 10.1002/chem.201100399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Larbi F., Bourahla S., Kouadri Moustefai S., and Elagra F., “Impact of Fluorine and Chlorine Doping on the Structural, Electronic, and Optical Properties of SnO2: First‐Principles Study,” Canadian Journal of Physics 101, no. 9 (2023): 496–503. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Jeon Y.‐S., Kang D.‐H., Kim J.‐H., and Park N.‐G., “Stability and Efficiency Improvement of Perovskite Solar Cells by Surface Hydroxyl Defect Passivation of SnO2 Layer With 4‐Fluorothiophenol,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 11, no. 7 (2023): 3673–3681, 10.1039/D2TA08488K. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ke C., Zhu W., Zhang Z., Soon Tok E., Ling B., and Pan J., “Thickness‐Induced Metal‐Insulator Transition in Sb‐Doped SnO2 Ultrathin Films: The Role of Quantum Confinement,” Scientific Reports 5, no. 1 (2015): 17424, 10.1038/srep17424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Cao X., Cao L., Yao W., and Ye X., “Influences of Dopants on the Electronic Structure of SnO2 Thin Films,” Thin Solid Films 317, no. 1‐2 (1998): 443–445, 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00638-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Chastain J. and King R. C. Jr, “Handbook of X‐Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy,” Perkin‐Elmer Corporation 40 (1992): 221. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Qi W., Guo S., Sun H., et al., “Synthesis and Characterization of sb2o3 Nanoparticles by Liquid Phase Method under Acidic Condition,” Journal of Crystal Growth 588 (2022): 126642, 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2022.126642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Fan G., Huang Z., Chai C., and Liao D., “Synthesis of Micro‐sized Sb2O3 Hierarchical Structures by Carbothermal Reduction Method,” Materials Letters 65, no. 8 (2011): 1141–1144, 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.09.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Izquierdo R., Sacher E., and Yelon A., “X‐Ray Photoelectron Spectra of Antimony Oxides,” Applied Surface Science 40, no. 1‐2 (1989): 175–177, 10.1016/0169-4332(89)90173-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Kalkofen B., Mothukuru V. M., Klingsporn M., and Burte E. P., “Investigation of Antimony Oxide Films Deposited by Atomic Layer Deposition,” ECS Transactions 45, no. 3 (2012): 461–473, 10.1149/1.3700912. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Reiche R., Holgado J., Yubero F., Espinos J., and Gonzalez‐Elipe A., “Characterization of Sb2O3 Subjected to Different Ion and Plasma Surface Treatments,” Surface and interface analysis 35, no. 3 (2003): 256–262, 10.1002/sia.1523. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Rastogi A. and Reddy K., “Growth of Dielectric Layers on the InSb Surface,” Thin Solid Films 270, no. 1‐2 (1995): 616–620, 10.1016/0040-6090(95)06987-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Santinacci L., Sproule G., Moisa S., et al., “Growth and Characterization of Thin Anodic Oxide Films on n‐InSb (100) Formed in Aqueous Solutions,” Corrosion Science 46, no. 8 (2004): 2067–2079, 10.1016/j.corsci.2003.11.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Bryngelsson H., Eskhult J., Nyholm L., Herranen M., Alm O., and Edström K., “Electrodeposited Sb and Sb/Sb2O3 Nanoparticle Coatings as Anode Materials for li‐ion Batteries,” Chemistry of materials 19, no. 5 (2007): 1170–1180, 10.1021/cm0624769. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Pérez O. E. L., Sánchez M. D., and Teijelo M. L., “Characterization of Growth of Anodic Antimony Oxide Films by Ellipsometry and XPS,” Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 645, no. 2 (2010): 143–148. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Akbar S., Hasanain S., Ivashenko O., et al., “Defect Ferromagnetism in SnO2: Zn2+ Hierarchical Nanostructures: Correlation Between Structural, Electronic and Magnetic Properties,” RSC Advances 9, no. 7 (2019): 4082–4091, 10.1039/C9RA00455F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Liu L., Ueda M., and Kawaharamura T., “Characterization and Study of High Conductivity Antimony‐Doped Tin Oxide Thin Films Grown by Mist Chemical Vapor Deposition,” RSC Advances 13, no. 20 (2023): 13456–13462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Heiras‐Trevizo A., Amézaga‐Madrid P., Corral‐Bustamante L., Antúnez‐Flores W., Ruiz P. P., and Miki‐Yoshida M., “Structural, Morphological, Optical and Electrical Properties of Sb‐Doped SnO2 Thin Films Obtained by Aerosol Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Thin Solid Films 638 (2017): 22–27, 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.07.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Powell M. J., Williamson B. A., Baek S.‐Y., et al., “Phosphorus Doped SnO2 Thin Films for Transparent Conducting Oxide Applications: Synthesis, Optoelectronic Properties and Computational Models,” Chemical Science 9, no. 41 (2018): 7968–7980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Feng X., Ma J., Yang F., et al., “Highly Thermal Stable Transparent Conducting SnO2: Sb Epitaxial Films Prepared on α‐Al2O3 (0001) by MOCVD,” Applied Surface Science 254, no. 20 (2008): 6601–6604, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.04.028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Wu H.‐W., Yang R.‐Y., Hsiung C. M., and Chu C.‐H., “Influence of Ag Thickness of Aluminum‐Doped ZnO/Ag/Aluminum‐Doped ZnO Thin Films,” Thin Solid Films 520, no. 24 (2012): 7147–7152, 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.07.124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Minami T., “New n‐Type Transparent Conducting Oxides,” MRS Bulletin 25, no. 8 (2000): 38–44, 10.1557/mrs2000.149. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Potter D. B., Bhachu D. S., Powell M. J., Darr J. A., Parkin I. P., and Carmalt C. J., “Al‐, ga‐, and In‐Doped ZnO Thin Films via Aerosol Assisted CVD for Use as Transparent Conducting Oxides,” Physica Status Solidi (a) 213, no. 5 (2016): 1346–1352. [Google Scholar]
- 58. Potter D. B., Parkin I. P., and Carmalt C. J., “The Effect of Solvent on Al‐Doped ZnO Thin Films Deposited via Aerosol Assisted CVD,” RSC Advances 8, no. 58 (2018): 33164–33173, 10.1039/C8RA06417B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Li J., Sathasivam S., Taylor A., Carmalt C. J., and Parkin I. P., “Single Step Route to Highly Transparent, Conductive and Hazy Aluminium Doped Zinc Oxide Films,” RSC Advances 8, no. 74 (2018): 42300–42307, 10.1039/C8RA09338E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Lekshmy S. S., Daniel G. P., and Joy K., “Microstructure and Physical Properties of Sol Gel Derived SnO2: Sb Thin Films for Optoelectronic Applications,” Applied Surface Science 274 (2013): 95–100, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.109. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Elangovan E. and Ramamurthi K., “A Study on Low Cost‐High Conducting Fluorine and Antimony‐Doped Tin Oxide Thin Films,” Applied Surface Science 249, no. 1‐4 (2005): 183–196, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.11.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Jung D.‐W. and Park D.‐W., “Synthesis of Nano‐Sized Antimony‐Doped Tin Oxide (ATO) Particles Using a DC Arc Plasma Jet,” Applied Surface Science 255, no. 10 (2009): 5409–5413, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Peelaers H. and Kioupakis E., “Free‐Carrier Absorption in Transparent Conducting Oxides: Phonon and Impurity Scattering in SnO2 ,” Physical Review B 92, no. 23 (2015): 235201, 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.235201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Cannavale A., Ayr U., Fiorito F., and Martellotta F., “Smart Electrochromic Windows to Enhance Building Energy Efficiency and Visual Comfort,” Energies 13, no. 6 (2020): 1449. [Google Scholar]
- 65. Zhuang S., Xu X., Yu J., Feng B., Xu W., and Hu J., “Transparent SnO2 QDs‐Based Multifunctional Glass for Ultraviolet‐Blocking and Enhanced Hydrophobicity,” Materials Letters 128 (2014): 291–294, 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Szanyi J., “The Origin of Haze in CVD Tin Oxide Thin Films,” Applied Surface Science 185, no. 3‐4 (2002): 161–171, 10.1016/S0169-4332(01)00554-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Elmi M. and Wang J., “Full Solar Spectrum Optical and Photothermal Characterization of Antimony Tin Oxide (ATO) Films with Tunable Nir Absorptivity for Energy‐Efficient Building Envelope Applications,” APL Materials 13, no. 10 (2025): 3192–3203. [Google Scholar]
- 68. Fadavieslam M., Azimi‐Juybari H., and Marashi M., “Dependence of O2, N2 Flow Rate and Deposition Time on the Structural, Electrical and Optical Properties of SnO2 Thin Films Deposited by Atmospheric Pressure Chemical Vapor Deposition (APCVD),” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 27 (2016): 921–930. [Google Scholar]
- 69. Kojima M., Kato H., and Gatto M., “Blackening of Tin Oxide Thin Films Heavily Doped With Antimony,” Philosophical Magazine B 68, no. 2 (1993): 215–222, 10.1080/01418639308226402. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Jarzebski Z. and Marton J., “Physical Properties of SnO2 Materials: I. Preparation and Defect Structure,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 123, no. 7 (1976): 199C–205C, 10.1149/1.2133010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Epifani M., Prades J. D., Comini E., et al., “The Role of Surface Oxygen Vacancies in the NO2 Sensing Properties of SnO2 Nanocrystals,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 112, no. 49 (2008): 19540–19546, 10.1021/jp804916g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Cox D. F., Fryberger T. B., and Semancik S., “Oxygen Vacancies and Defect Electronic States on the SnO2 (110)‐1× 1 Surface,” Physical Review B 38, no. 3 (1988): 2072–2083, 10.1103/PhysRevB.38.2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Sabnis S., Bhadane P. A., and Kulkarni P., “Feasibility Study of New Techniques: Spray Pyrolysis Simulation,” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 4, no. 7 (2013): 112–119. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Mirzaee M. and Dolati A., “Effects of Tin Valence on Microstructure, Optical, and Electrical Properties of ITO Thin Films Prepared by Sol–Gel Method,” Journal of Sol‐Gel Science and Technology 75 (2015): 582–592, 10.1007/s10971-015-3729-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Jia J., Muto Y., Oka N., and Shigesato Y., “Annealing Effects on ta Doped SnO2 Films,” MRS Proceedings (OPL) 1454 (2012): 245–251, 10.1557/opl.2012.1236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Filippatos P.‐P., Kelaidis N., Vasilopoulou M., Davazoglou D., and Chroneos A., “Defect Processes in Halogen Doped SnO2 ,” Applied Sciences 11, no. 2 (2021): 551. [Google Scholar]
- 77. Ramzan I., Blunt M. O., Parkin I. P., and Carmalt C. J., “Optimized SnO2 Thin Films: Correlating Solution Chemistry and Deposition Conditions With Optoelectronic Properties,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 18 (2026): 19364–19379, 10.1021/acsami.6c03389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Messad A., Bruneaux J., Cachet H., and Froment M., “Analysis of the Effects of Substrate Temperature, Concentration of Tin Chloride and Nature of Dopants on the Structural and Electrical Properties of Sprayed SnO2 Films,” Journal of Materials Science 29, no. 19 (1994): 5095–5103, 10.1007/BF01151102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Bruneaux J., Cachet H., Froment M., and Messad A., “Structural, Electrical and Interfacial Properties of Sprayed SnO2 Films,” Electrochimica Acta 39, no. 8‐9 (1994): 1251–1257, 10.1016/0013-4686(94)E0044-Z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Epifani M., Alvisi M., Mirenghi L., Leo G., Siciliano P., and Vasanelli L., “Sol–Gel Processing and Characterization of Pure and Metal‐Doped SnO2 Thin Films,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society 84, no. 1 (2001): 48–54, 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00606.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Mukhamedshina D., Fedosimova A., Dmitriyeva E., et al., “Influence of Plasma Treatment on Physical Properties of Thin SnO2 Films Obtained From SnCl4 Solutions With Additions of NH4F and NH4OH,” Eurasian Chemico‐Technological Journal 21, no. 1 (2019): 57–61, 10.18321/ectj791. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Utriainen M., Kovács K., Campbell J., Niinistö L., and Réti F., “Controlled Electrical Conductivity in SnO2 Thin Films by Oxygen or Hydrocarbon Assisted Atomic Layer Epitaxy,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society 146, no. 1 (1999): 189–193, 10.1149/1.1391585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Cheng H.‐E., Tian D.‐C., and Huang K.‐C., “Properties of SnO2 Films Grown by Atomic Layer Deposition,” Procedia Engineering 36 (2012): 510–515, 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.03.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Haacke G., “New Figure of Merit for Transparent Conductors,” Journal of Applied physics 47, no. 9 (1976): 4086–4089. [Google Scholar]
- 85. Galaviz‐Pérez J., Chen F., Shen Q., Vargas‐García J., and Zhang L., “Nanocrystalline Antimony‐Doped Tin Oxide Films Prepared by Sol‐Gel,” in Proceedings of the Eighth Pacific Rim International Congress on Advanced Materials and Processing, (Springer, 2013), 1983–1990. 10.1007/978-3-319-48764-9_246. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Conti T. G., Chiquito A. J., and Leite E. R., “Electrical Properties of SnO2: Sb Ultrathin Films Prepared by Colloidal Deposition Process,” Journal of Materials Research 31, no. 1 (2016): 148–153. [Google Scholar]
- 87. Babar A., Shinde S., Moholkar A., Bhosale C., and Rajpure K., “Structural and Optoelectronic Properties of Sprayed Sb: SnO2 Thin Films: Effects of Substrate Temperature and Nozzle‐to‐Substrate Distance,” Journal of Semiconductors 32, no. 10 (2011): 102001. [Google Scholar]
- 88. Kim K.‐S., Yoon S.‐Y., Lee W.‐J., and Kim K. H., “Surface Morphologies and Electrical Properties of Antimony‐Doped Tin Oxide Films Deposited by Plasma‐Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,” Surface and Coatings Technology 138, no. 2‐3 (2001): 229–236. [Google Scholar]
- 89. Burgard D., Goebbert C., and Nass R., “Synthesis of Nanocrystalline, Redispersable Antimony‐Doped SnO2 Particles for the Preparation of Conductive, Transparent Coatings,” Journal of Sol‐Gel Science and Technology 13, no. 1 (1998): 789–792. [Google Scholar]
- 90. Yu S., Zheng H., Li L., and Chen S., “Highly Conducting and Transparent Antimony Doped Tin Oxide Thin Films: The Role of Sputtering Power Density,” Ceramics International 43, no. 7 (2017): 5654–5660. [Google Scholar]
- 91. Abendroth T., Schumm B., Alajlan S. A., et al., “Optical and Thermal Properties of Transparent Infrared Blocking Antimony Doped Tin Oxide Thin Films,” Thin Solid Films 624 (2017): 152–159. [Google Scholar]
- 92. Montero J., Guillén C., and Herrero J., “Discharge Power Dependence of Structural, Optical and Electrical Properties of DC Sputtered Antimony Doped Tin Oxide (ATO) Films,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 95, no. 8 (2011): 2113–2119. [Google Scholar]
- 93. Babar A., Shinde S., Moholkar A., Bhosale C., Kim J., and Rajpure K., “Structural and Optoelectronic Properties of Antimony Incorporated Tin Oxide Thin Films. Journal of Alloys and Compounds,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 505, no. 2 (2010): 416–422. [Google Scholar]
- 94. Montero J., Herrero J., and Guillén C., “Preparation of Reactively Sputtered Sb‐Doped SnO2 Thin Films: Structural, Electrical and Optical Properties,” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 94, no. 3 (2010): 612–616. [Google Scholar]
- 95. Montero J., Guillén C., and Herrero J., “Nanocrystalline Antimony Doped Tin Oxide (ATO) Thin Films: A Thermal Restructuring Study,” Surface and Coatings Technology 211 (2012): 37–40. [Google Scholar]
- 96. Weidner M., Jia J., Shigesato Y., and Klein A., “Comparative Study of Sputter‐Deposited SnO2 Films Doped with Antimony or Tantalum,” Physica Status Solidi (b) 253, no. 5 (2016): 923–928. [Google Scholar]
- 97. Reddy N. P., Muniramaiah R., Santhosh R.; et al., “Cost‐Effective Sb‐Doped SnO2 Films as Stable and Efficient Alternative Transparent Conducting Electrodes for Dye‐Sensitized Solar Cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 10, no. 20 (2022): 7997–8008. [Google Scholar]
- 98. Gong W., Guo H., Zhang H., et al., “Chlorine‐Doped SnO2 Hydrophobic Surfaces for Large Grain Perovskite Solar Cells,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C 8, no. 33 (2020): 11638–11646. [Google Scholar]
- 99. Sarkar T., Ghosh S., Annamalai M.; et al., “The Effect of Oxygen Vacancies on Water Wettability of Transition Metal Based SrTiO3 and Rare‐Earth Based Lu2O3 ,” RSC Advances 6, no. 110 (2016): 109234–109240. [Google Scholar]
- 100. Mazur M., Song S., Domaradzki J.; et al., “Analysis of Substrate Type and Thickness Influence on Wettability of Nb2O5 Thin Films,” in International Students and Young Scientists Workshop, (IEEE, 2011), 94–98. 10.1109/STYSW.2011.6155851. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Supporting File: advs76476‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

