ABSTRACT
Enterococcus mundtii is a gram-positive bacterium found in the environment and mammalian gastrointestinal tracts and is an infrequent cause of infections in humans. We describe the isolation and sequencing of three closely related isolates of E. mundtii obtained from soil. These strains will be useful for work on understudied enterococci.
KEYWORDS: Entercoccus mundtii, enterococci, soil bacteria, whole-genome sequencing
ANNOUNCEMENT
Enterococcus species are gram-positive, facultative anaerobic bacteria frequently found as gastrointestinal tract commensals in mammals, birds, and insects, and these bacteria are prevalent in the environment (1–4). The best-studied enterococcal species, Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium, cause infections in humans and can be highly resistant to antimicrobials (5). Other enterococci are relatively understudied, yet display interesting phenotypes such as pigmentation and motility (6, 7). This study presents the draft genome sequences of three closely related isolates of Enterococcus mundtii, which are pigmented and non-motile (8, 9). Soil samples were collected in collaboration with the MICB 4215 course at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities during October 2023. Approximately 0.5 grams of soil were resuspended in 0.5 mL sterile water, and 0.1 mL was plated on both tryptic soy agar (TSA) and bile esculin azide (BEA) agar, a selective medium for enterococci. Plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Three presumptive Enterococcus isolates (dark colonies on BEA plates) were obtained from a soil sample taken after a rainstorm from beneath a large mushroom near the University of Minnesota. These three isolates, designated 4215-23-A1 through C1, were chosen for further analysis due to their yellow pigmentation on TSA plates, which differs from other enterococci such as E. faecalis. All putative enterococci were restreaked, grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB), and stored at −80°C in TSB supplemented with 25% glycerol.
Samples from freezer stocks were grown statically in TSB for 24 h at 37°C. DNA was isolated using a Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit with a lysozyme pre-treatment as previously described for E. faecalis (10). Concentration of DNA was measured using Qubit, and DNA purity was assessed using a NanoDrop. Library preparation and whole-genome sequencing were performed at SeqCoast. Libraries were prepared with the Illumina DNA Prep tagmentation kit and IDT for Illumina Unique Dual Indexes. An Illumina NextSeq2000 (300 cycle flow cell, 2 × 150 bp paired-end reads) was used for sequencing. DRAGEN (v3.10.12) was used for demultiplexing, read analytics, and trimming. Read quality was inspected using FastQC (11), and reads were assembled in Unicycler v0.4.8 (12) and annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline version 6.10 (13). Samples were identified as E. mundtii using the Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center (BV-BRC) Taxonomic Classification Service (14). This classification was consistent with colony phenotypes, specifically production of yellow pigment. Isolate information is provided in Table 1. No plasmids were identified in any isolate using PlasmidFinder-2.0 (15) with the default settings or by inspecting Bandage plots (16) in BV-BRC. All strains had 49 transfer RNAs and 2 16S ribosomal RNA genes. All samples had >99% completeness with 0.16%–0.26% contamination as evaluated by CheckM (v1.2.4) (17).
TABLE 1.
Genome information and GenBank assembly statistics for Enterococcus mundtii isolates from soil
| Enterococcus mundtii isolates | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 4215-23-A1 | 4215-23-B1 | 4215-23-C1 | |
| Genome size (bp) | 3,122,934 | 3,040,745 | 3,051,831 |
| Contigs | 67 | 53 | 59 |
| Genome coverage | 99× | 102× | 135× |
| N50 (bp) | 237,970 | 238,061 | 238,097 |
| Genes | 2,959 | 2,870 | 2,892 |
| Protein-coding genes | 2,859 | 2,770 | 2,795 |
| GC content (%) | 38 | 38.5 | 38.5 |
| Sequence Read Archive (SRA) accession | SRR35794999 | SRR35794998 | SRR35794997 |
| BioSample accession number | SAMN52748871 | SAMN52748872 | SAMN52748873 |
| GenBank assembly number | GCA_054482215.1 | GCA_054482255.1 | GCA_054482235.1 |
| ANI match to type strain DSM 4838 (%) | 96.5 | 96.5 | 96.5 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank the students in the University of Minnesota College of Biological Sciences course MICB 4215 during fall 2023 for their enthusiasm.
A.L.H. was supported in part by National Institutes of Health training grant T32GM140936.
Contributor Information
Julia L. E. Willett, Email: jwillett@umn.edu.
Daria Van Tyne, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Raw reads from all E. mundtii isolates were deposited with BioProject number PRJNA1345430. Isolate accession numbers in
Sequence Read Archive (SRA) are SRR35794999 (A1), SRR35794998 (B1), and SRR35794997 (C1). The GenBank assembly of type strain Enterococcus mundtii DSM 4838 is GCA_007990125.1.
REFERENCES
- 1. Lebreton F, Manson AL, Saavedra JT, Straub TJ, Earl AM, Gilmore MS. 2017. Tracing the enterococci from paleozoic origins to the hospital. Cell 169:849–861. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Schwartzman JA, Lebreton F, Salamzade R, Shea T, Martin MJ, Schaufler K, Urhan A, Abeel T, Camargo I, Sgardioli BF, et al. 2024. Global diversity of enterococci and description of 18 previously unknown species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 121:e2310852121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2310852121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Byappanahalli MN, Nevers MB, Korajkic A, Staley ZR, Harwood VJ. 2012. Enterococci in the environment. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 76:685–706. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00023-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Goh HMS, Yong MHA, Chong KKL, Kline KA. 2017. Model systems for the study of enterococcal colonization and infection. Virulence 8:1525–1562. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2017.1279766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Willett JLE, Dunny GM. 2025. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis from functional genomics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 89:e0008123. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00081-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Palmer KL, Godfrey P, Griggs A, Kos VN, Zucker J, Desjardins C, Cerqueira G, Gevers D, Walker S, Wortman J, et al. 2012. Comparative genomics of enterococci: variation in Enterococcus faecalis, clade structure in E. faecium, and defining characteristics of E. gallinarum and E. casseliflavus. MBio 3:e00318-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00318-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Aarestrup FM, Butaye P, Witte W. 2002. Nonhuman reservoirs of enterococci, p 55–99. In The Enterococci. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ran Q, Badgley BD, Dillon N, Dunny GM, Sadowsky MJ. 2013. Occurrence, genetic diversity, and persistence of enterococci in a Lake Superior watershed. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:3067–3075. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03908-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Repizo GD, Espariz M, Blancato VS, Suárez CA, Esteban L, Magni C. 2014. Genomic comparative analysis of the environmental Enterococcus mundtii against enterococcal representative species. BMC Genomics 15:489. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-489 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Willett JLE, Dale JL, Kwiatkowski LM, Powers JL, Korir ML, Kohli R, Barnes AMT, Dunny GM. 2021. Comparative biofilm assays using Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF identify new determinants of biofilm formation. mBio 12:e0101121. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01011-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Available from: https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
- 12. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLOS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Olson RD, Assaf R, Brettin T, Conrad N, Cucinell C, Davis JJ, Dempsey DM, Dickerman A, Dietrich EM, Kenyon RW, et al. 2023. Introducing the bacterial and viral bioinformatics resource center (BV-BRC): a resource combining PATRIC, IRD and ViPR. Nucleic Acids Res 51:D678–D689. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wick RR, Schultz MB, Zobel J, Holt KE. 2015. Bandage: interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 31:3350–3352. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw reads from all E. mundtii isolates were deposited with BioProject number PRJNA1345430. Isolate accession numbers in
Sequence Read Archive (SRA) are SRR35794999 (A1), SRR35794998 (B1), and SRR35794997 (C1). The GenBank assembly of type strain Enterococcus mundtii DSM 4838 is GCA_007990125.1.
