Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2026 Jun 22;15(7):e00087-26. doi: 10.1128/mra.00087-26

Draft genome sequence of two strains of carotenoid-producing yeast Rhodotorula sp., isolated from a mangrove leaf in Okinawa, Japan

Anh Thi Nhat Tran 1, Toshikazu Suenaga 1,✉, Takehiko Gotoh 1, Wataru Nishijima 2, Satoshi Nakai 1,✉
Editor: Jason E Stajich3
PMCID: PMC13348368  PMID: 42363856

ABSTRACT

Basidiomycetous red yeast Rhodotorula sp. is prevalent and abundant in the open ocean. This study reports the draft genomes of the Rhodotorula sp. strains HGY1 and HGY2. The strains are capable of producing carotenoids, such as β-carotene, and are regarded as potential hosts for biorefinery.

KEYWORDS: Rhodororula sp., yeasts, genomics

ANNOUNCEMENT

Rhodotorula is a genus of red yeast that belongs to the phylum Basidiomycota (family Sporidiobolaceae) and inhabits diverse environments and clinical settings (1). Strains of this genus have been studied because of their ability to accumulate antioxidant carotenoids, including β-carotene and astaxanthin (2, 3), as well as and fatty acids and enzymes (4, 5). Notably, a number of Rhodotorula species possess psychrophilic and extremophilic characteristics that allow them to survive at low temperatures and low pH levels (6, 7). Consequently, sequencing the genomes of novel Rhodotorula strains enables comparative analyses among yeasts and provides insights into their genetic basis.

Rhodotorula sp. strains HGY1 and HGY2 were isolated from mangrove leaf in Okinawa (26°21′49.5″ N 127°44′47.2″ E; 2018), Japan, using the same procedure as Aurantiochytrium sp. strains described in a previous study (8). We confirmed the production of carotenoids such as β-carotene in these strains by HPLC analysis (0.03 and 0.06 mg/g biomass, respectively). Leaf samples were aseptically placed on antibiotic-supplemented ATCC 2673 agar and incubated at 25°C in the dark. Emerging colonies were then transferred to ATCC 790 By+ liquid medium and cultivated with shaking for strain isolation (9). Purified strains were obtained by repeated single-colony isolation after initial plating on ATCC 2673 agar. Colonies were serially diluted and re-plated until axenic cultures were established (9). Cells were lysed and the genome was extracted using the ISOIL Beads Beating DNA Extraction Kit (2nd edition, Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer’s protocols. The DNA was enzymatically sheared into short fragments. The library was prepared from the DNA fragments using the Rapid Plus DNA Lib Prep Kit for Illumina v2 (ABclonal, Hubei-China), MGIEasy Circularization Kit, and MGIEasy Universal Library Conversion Kit (MGI_Tech., Shenzhen, China) for end repair, A-tailing, adapter ligation, and circularization. Sequencing data were collected by DNBSEQ T7 platform with 150 × 150 paired-end sequencing mode by the sequencing service (Novogene, Beijing, China). Poor-quality reads (<Q30) and sequencing adapters were removed with fastp (v.0.23.2) (10) and assembled by MEGAHIT (v.2.1.9) using default parameters (11). The repeat sequences were masked using Red (v.2.0) (12). Genome completeness was evaluated using BUSCO (v6.0.0) (13). Information on the sequencing data and genome is summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

General genomic characteristics of Rhodotorula sp. strain HGY1, strain HGY2

Strain name Rhodotorula sp. strain HGY1 Rhodotorula sp. strain HGY2
The closest species based on BLAST search of 18S rRNA (percent identity [%]) Rhodotorula diobovata strain JCM 3787 (99.55) Rhodotorula diobovata strain JCM 3787 (99.55)
Genome size (Mbp) 21.2 21.4
GC content (%) 64.24 64.28
Number of contigs 441 339
N50 of assembly (kbp) 241 243
Output number of reads (×107 reads) 1.96 1.33
Output bases (Gbp) 2.8 2.0
Coverage (×) 132 93
BUSCO score (%) 96.1 94.6
Acc. num. of genome assembly BAAJPB010000000 BAAJPC010000000
Acc. num. of BioSample SAMD0179279 SAMD01797280
Acc. num. of SRA DRR899617 DRR899618

The total length was estimated to be 21.2–21.4 Mbp, close to that of related species reported for R. diobovata strain 08-225 (21.1 Mbp) (14) and R. glutinis strain ZHK (22.3 Mbp) (15). Figure 1 shows the phylogenetic tree of the isolated strains based on full-length 18S rRNA sequences, aligned using MAFFT_v.7 (16). These two strains (HGY1 and HGY2) were closely related to Rhodotorula diobovata strain JCM 3787, showing an identity score of 99.55% based on a BLAST search (17) of the 18S rRNA sequence. The ANI values calculated using FastANI (18) are also shown in Fig. 1, indicating that these strains belong to the genus Rhodotorula. The genomes reported in this study are promising to contribute to the elucidation of the metabolism of bio-products in industrial applications of Rhodotorula sp.

Fig 1.

Phylogenetic tree of 18S rRNA gene sequences showing Rhodotorula sp. HGY1 and HGY2 clustering together with 96.7% ANI, distinct from related species including R. diobovata, R. graminis, and R. glutinis.

Phylogenetic tree based on full-length 18S rRNA gene sequences. The strains used in this investigation (Rhodotorula sp. HGY1 and HGY2) are shown in bold. Bootstrap values were obtained using 100 replicates and are shown as >75% (closed circles) and 50–75% (open circles) at each node. The sequences were aligned using MAFFT, and the phylogenetic tree was inferred using the neighbor-joining method. The tree was visualized with Archaeopteryx.js v.2.0.0 and then improved graphically with Affinity (v.3.0.2). The ANI values for each comparison between strain HGY1 and the other strains are shown in blue.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was financially supported by the Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation (08-003-189).

Contributor Information

Toshikazu Suenaga, Email: suenagat@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.

Satoshi Nakai, Email: sn4247621@hiroshima-u.ac.jp.

Jason E. Stajich, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

The sequencing data were deposited in DDBJ under BioProject ID PRJDB40089, and the accession numbers of the genomes of strains HGY1 and HGY2 are BAAJPB010000001–BAAJPB010000441 and BAAJPC010000001–BAAJPC010000339, respectively.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Sykes JE, Reagan KL. 2021. 85 - Candidiasis and Rhodotorulosis, p 1061–1068. In Sykes JE (ed), Greene’s infectious diseases of the dog and cat, Fifth Edition. Vol. Available from. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Phuengjayaem S, Kingkaew E, Hoondee P, Tanasupawat S. 2025. Enhancement of astaxanthin production in novel red yeast Rhodosporidiobolus sp. SP3-3/4 and genomic characterization. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 23:102244. doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2025.102244 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mussagy CU, Guimarães AAC, Rocha LVF, Winterburn J, Santos-Ebinuma V de C, Pereira JFB. 2021. Improvement of carotenoids production from Rhodotorula glutinis CCT-2186. Biochem Eng J 165:107827. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2020.107827 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Vasconcelos B, Teixeira JC, Dragone G, Teixeira JA. 2019. Oleaginous yeasts for sustainable lipid production-from biodiesel to surf boards, a wide range of “green” applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:3651–3667. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09742-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Hernalsteens S, Maugeri F. 2008. Purification and characterisation of a fructosyltransferase from Rhodotorula sp. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:589–596. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1470-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Margesin R, Fonteyne PA, nov. R. 2007. Novel psychrophilic basidiomycetous yeast species isolated from alpine environments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:2179–2184. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65111-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Coleine C, Masonjones S, Onofri S, Selbmann L, Stajich JE. 2020. Draft genome sequence of the yeast Rhodotorula sp. strain CCFEE 5036, isolated from McMurdo dry valleys, Antarctica. Microbiol Resour Announc 9. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00020-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Suenaga T, Mitarai Y, Anh TN, Gotoh T, Nishijima W, Nakai S. 2024. Draft genome sequence of Aurantiochytrium spp. strains L3W, 9LR, 8W, 10W, and 10LW, a fatty acid-producing thraustochytrids from food wastes. Microbiol Resour Announc 13:e0065324. doi: 10.1128/mra.00653-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Nakai S, Das A, Maeda Y, Humaidah N, Ohno M, Nishijima W, Gotoh T, Okuda T. 2021. A novel strain of Aurantiochytrium sp. strain L3W and its characteristics of biomass and lipid production including valuable fatty acids. J of Wat & Envir Tech 19:24–34. doi: 10.2965/jwet.20-087 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. Fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Li D, Luo R, Liu C-M, Leung C-M, Ting H-F, Sadakane K, Yamashita H, Lam T-W. 2016. MEGAHIT v1.0: A fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods 102:3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.02.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Girgis HZ. 2015. Red: an intelligent, rapid, accurate tool for detecting repeats de-novo on the genomic scale. BMC Bioinformatics 16:227. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0654-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tegenfeldt F, Kuznetsov D, Manni M, Berkeley M, Zdobnov EM, Kriventseva EV. 2025. OrthoDB and BUSCO update: annotation of orthologs with wider sampling of genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 53:D516–D522. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkae987 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Fakankun I, Fristensky B, Levin DB. 2021. Genome Sequence analysis of the oleaginous yeast, Rhodotorula diobovata, and Comparison of the carotenogenic and oleaginous pathway genes and gene products with other oleaginous yeasts. J Fungi (Basel) 7:320. doi: 10.3390/jof7040320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Li CJ, Zhao D, Cheng P, Zheng L, Yu GH. 2020. Genomics and lipidomics analysis of the biotechnologically important oleaginous red yeast Rhodotorula glutinis ZHK provides new insights into its lipid and carotenoid metabolism. BMC Genomics 21:834. doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07244-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. 2019. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Brief Bioinform 20:1160–1166. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The sequencing data were deposited in DDBJ under BioProject ID PRJDB40089, and the accession numbers of the genomes of strains HGY1 and HGY2 are BAAJPB010000001–BAAJPB010000441 and BAAJPC010000001–BAAJPC010000339, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES