ABSTRACT
We hereby report the complete genome sequence of Vibrio sp. RC2502, a gram-negative bacterium isolated from mangrove tidal flats and capable of directly degrading crystalline chitin. The genome has a size of 3,313,050 bp and exhibited a 45.5% GC content, with 2,923 coding sequences.
KEYWORDS: crystalline chitin, Chitinase, genomic analysis
ANNOUNCEMENT
Chitin, the second most abundant natural polysaccharide after cellulose (1), can be hydrolyzed into bioactive N-acetyl chitooligosaccharides (2). However, its highly recalcitrant crystalline structure limits biodegradation (3), and few marine microorganisms can directly utilize it (4). In this study, we isolated a crystalline chitin-degrading bacterium, Vibrio sp. RC2502, from mangrove tidal-flat sediment collected in Guangdong Province, China (23.56° N, 117.03° E). To isolate the strain, 1 g of sediment was inoculated into 50 mL of minimal medium supplemented with 10 g/L crystalline chitin as the sole carbon source (5). After 3 days of enrichment at 25°C, Vibrio sp. RC2502 was isolated from colloidal chitin agar based on clear-zone formation and purified by three rounds of streaking. Its direct utilization of crystalline chitin was confirmed by robust growth in minimal medium containing 10 g/L crystalline chitin.
Strain RC2502 was cultivated in 2216E liquid medium (Qingdao Hope Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., China) at 25°C for 12 h with shaking at 180 rpm. Genomic DNA was extracted from freshly cultured bacterial isolates using an SDS-based method (6), followed by purification with organic extraction and magnetic beads. Genomic DNA was extracted from a single culture, and the same DNA preparation was used for both Nanopore and Illumina library construction.
For short-read sequencing, libraries were prepared from qualified genomic DNA using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England Biolabs, USA) after fragmentation with a Covaris instrument and were sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq platform to generate paired-end 150 bp reads. Raw reads were subjected to quality control and adapter trimming using fastp v0.25.0 (7). For long-read sequencing, libraries were prepared from 2.0 to 2.5 μg of DNA using the Oxford Nanopore ligation sequencing kit (SQK-LSK110) and native barcoding kit (EXP-NBD196). The library was then loaded onto an R9.4 flow cell and sequenced on a PromethION platform (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK) for 48–72 h. Raw Nanopore sequencing reads were basecalled using Guppy v1.2.0 with the high-accuracy algorithm to ensure high-quality sequence output (8). Nanopore reads were quality-controlled using NextDenovo v2.0 to filter out low-quality reads prior to genome assembly (9).
Hybrid genome assembly was performed using Unicycler v0.4.9 (10), combining Illumina short reads and Nanopore long reads. Genome annotation was carried out using Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline v6.10 (11). Genome quality was assessed using CheckM v1.2.4 (12), which estimated the genome completeness to be 87.01% with a contamination rate of 0.13%. Based on BLASTN analysis, the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain RC2502 (from genome, NZ_CM141453.1:25954-27506) showed the highest similarity (99.73%) to Vibrio alginolyticus NBRC 15630T (CP006718). Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences performed by MEGA X (13) for strain RC2502 and related taxa indicated that strain RC2502 could be affiliated with the genus Vibrio (Fig. 1). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.
Fig 1.
Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationships between strain RC2502 and related taxa within the genus Vibrio. Bootstrap values (%) based on 1,000 replicates are shown at branch nodes. The scale bar represents 0.01 nucleotide substitutions per site. Photobacterium chitinilyticum BEI 247T and Alteromonas macleodii DSM 6062T were used as the outgroup.
The genome characteristics are summarized in Table 1. In addition, several genes putatively involved in chitin degradation were identified, including ACYJZR_11520, ACYJZR_03005, ACYJZR_03740, and ACYJZR_12245, supporting the capacity of this strain to degrade crystalline chitin.
TABLE 1.
Genome characteristics of the strain Vibrio sp. RC2502
| Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Sequencing and assembly features | |
| No. of Illumina total reads | 5,099,980 |
| No. of nanopore total reads | 168,932 |
| Total no. of Illumina bases (bp) | 763,098,168 |
| Total no. of nanopore bases (bp) | 1,558,768,236 |
| Nanopore N50 (bp) | 32,992 |
| Genome coverage (×) (Illumina and Nanopore) | 230 and 470 |
| Genome features | |
| Chromosome size (GC content [%]) | 3,313,050 (45.5) |
| Total no. of genes | 3,100 |
| No. of CDSs (with protein) | 2,923 |
| No. of pseudogenes | 21 |
| No. of rRNAs | 12, 11, 11 (5S, 16S, 23S) |
| No. of tRNAs | 118 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financially supported by the Program of Science and Technology Cooperation with Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan under the Shanghai Action Plan for Science, Technology and Innovation (23190760400).
Contributor Information
Xin Song, Email: daohongxuan@126.com.
J. Cameron Thrash, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The complete genome sequence of Vibrio sp. RC2502 has been deposited in the GenBank database under accession number JBTVZT000000000, with BioSample number SAMN52939805 and BioProject number PRJNA1354114. The Illumina and Nanopore raw sequencing reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive under accession numbers SRR37718281 and SRR37718280, respectively.
REFERENCES
- 1. Terkula Iber B, Azman Kasan N, Torsabo D, Wese Omuwa J. 2022. A review of various sources of chitin and chitosan in nature. J Renew Mater 10:1097–1123. doi: 10.32604/jrm.2022.018142 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Miguez N, Kidibule P, Santos-Moriano P, Ballesteros AO, Fernandez-Lobato M, Plou FJ. 2021. Enzymatic synthesis and characterization of different families of chitooligosaccharides and their bioactive properties. Appl Sci (Basel) 11:3212. doi: 10.3390/app11073212 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kaczmarek MB, Struszczyk-Swita K, Li X, Szczęsna-Antczak M, Daroch M. 2019. Enzymatic modifications of chitin, chitosan, and chitooligosaccharides. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 7:243. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Song J, Su H, Sun J, Mao X. 2024. Biodegradation of crystalline chitin: a review of recent advancement, challenges, and future study directions. J Ocean Univ China 23:1319–1328. doi: 10.1007/s11802-024-5983-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Ren XB, Dang YR, Liu SS, Huang KX, Qin QL, Chen XL, Zhang YZ, Wang YJ, Li PY. 2022. Identification and characterization of three chitinases with potential in direct conversion of crystalline chitin into N,N′-diacetylchitobiose. Mar Drugs 20:165. doi: 10.3390/md20030165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kabir S, Shahriar M, Kabir A, Uddin MG. 2006. High salt SDS-based method for the direct extraction of genomic DNA from three different gram-negative organisms. CDR 1:57–64. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Wick RR, Judd LM, Holt KE. 2019. Performance of neural network basecalling tools for Oxford Nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol 20:129. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1727-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hu J, Wang Z, Sun Z, Hu B, Ayoola AO, Liang F, Li J, Sandoval JR, Cooper DN, Ye K, Ruan J, Xiao C-L, Wang D, Wu D-D, Wang S. 2024. NextDenovo: an efficient error correction and accurate assembly tool for noisy long reads. Genome Biol 25:107. doi: 10.1186/s13059-024-03252-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The complete genome sequence of Vibrio sp. RC2502 has been deposited in the GenBank database under accession number JBTVZT000000000, with BioSample number SAMN52939805 and BioProject number PRJNA1354114. The Illumina and Nanopore raw sequencing reads have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive under accession numbers SRR37718281 and SRR37718280, respectively.

