ABSTRACT
In this announcement, we present the draft genome of Bacillus anthracis strain Bundesheer. This strain was isolated from a postal sack in Vienna in 2001. Phylogenetic analysis using canonical single-nucleotide polymorphism (canSNP) showed that it belongs to A.Br.081 and that it is highly similar to the Ames “Ancestor” strain.
KEYWORDS: anthrax, microbiology, bioforensics, canSNP
ANNOUNCEMENT
The Gram-positive spore-former Bacillus anthracis played the central role in the 2001 Amerithrax letter attacks in the United States (1). During that time, the Austrian Armed Forces were conducting an assistance operation at the U.S. embassy in Vienna. Postal sacks were sampled by collecting 500 L of air on gelatine filters (3-µm pore size, 80-mm diameter; Sartorius, USA) at 50 L/min using an air sampler (MD8; Sartorius, USA; Fig. 1). Filters were directly incubated on sheep-blood agar at 37°C for 24 h. Suspicious colonies were heat-lysed in deionized water, directly subjected to the LightCycler B. anthracis Detection Kit on a LightCycler 480 II system (Roche Applied Science, Switzerland), and confirmed using previously described methods (2). Colonies were stored in Microbank (Pro-Lab Diagnostics, UK), as previously described (3). Preliminary genetic analysis suggested the strain originated from natural contamination of the fabrics (4). DNA for WGS was extracted from a colony grown overnight on a Standard-I agar plate (Carl Roth, Germany) using the modified MasterPure Complete DNA/RNA Purification Kit (Lucigen, USA) with additional Ready-to-Lyse lysozyme (Lucigen, USA), as described previously (3). DNA quality and quantity were assessed using the HS Large Fragment 50-kb kit on the FragmentAnalyzer 5200 system (Agilent Technologies Inc., USA).
Fig 1.
Sampling of postal sack via air sampler (A,B). Blood agar plate showing a mixed culture from a sampled postal sack, with an arrow highlighting the confirmed presence of B. anthracis. (C) Rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree including the isolated B. anthracis strain Bundesheer from a postal sack in the U.S. embassy in Austria. The tree was calculated from chromosomal SNP analysis of 3,717 SNP positions (bootstrap confidence from 500 permutations was generated, and the tree with the highest likelihood is shown) (D).
Whole genome sequencing was performed using the Pacbio SEQUEL I System (Pacific Biosciences, USA). Libraries were prepared according to the “Procedure & Checklist – Preparing Multiplexed Microbial Libraries Using SMRTbell Express Template Prep Kit 2.0” (Pacific Bioscience, USA) with no size selection. HMW DNA (≤2 µg) was sheared using the Megaruptor2-system (Diagenode, BEL) in 200 µL PacBio Elution Buffer with the 10-kb setting. Libraries were sequenced on SMRT Cell 1M v3 LR cells using the Sequel sequencing kit 3.0 chemistry (Pacific Biosiences, USA). The run produced 124,462 N50 (30,265 Q35) reads, with an average N50 read length of 8,259 bp (6,440 bp for Q35), quality-checked by the SMRT Link Analysis Services GUI 10.1.0.119588 software. Default parameters for all software were used except where otherwise noted. HiFi reads were used for de novo assembly with an expected genome size of 5.5 Mb and mapped against the reference genome B. anthracis str. Ames Ancestor using the SMRT Link modules Microbial Assembly and Mapping (Pacific Biosciences, USA). The assembly yielded three circular contigs (randomly rotated) corresponding to the chromosome (5,227,404 bp) and the plasmids pXO1 (181,676 bp) and pXO2 (94,832 bp), with an N50 of 5,227,404 bp, a total length of 5,503,913 bp, and a mean coverage of 35×, all determined by SMRT Link software.
QC was performed using CheckM v1.2.4 (5), BUSCO V05.02.2002 (6), and PGAP V6.8 (7) to assess completeness (98.62%), contamination (0.4%), GC content (35%), coding sequence estimate (5641), and ANI (99.97% to B. anthracis). The rooted maximum-likelihood tree was calculated, as previously described (3).
Phylogenetic analysis via canonical single-nucleotide polymorphism (canSNP) showed that the “Bundesheer” strain belongs to A.Br.081 (Ames) with high similarity to the Ames “Ancestor” strain (Fig. 1). The theory regarding a natural contamination of fabrics (4) can be refuted based on this finding.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was financed as part of the FFG FORTE Project EuroThrax (project number 885060) of the Ministry of Finance in Austria.
Contributor Information
Monika Ehling-Schulz, Email: monika.ehling-schulz@vetmeduni.ac.at.
Atmika Paudel, Fluxus Inc., Sunnyvale, California, USA.
DATA AVAILABILITY
Raw reads and assembly data have been deposited at NCBI BioProject PRJNA1167934 (Biosample: SAMN44019342; SRA: SRS22798577, Assembly: GCF_043295875.1). The version described in this paper is the first version.
REFERENCES
- 1. Committee on Review of the Scientific Approaches Used During the FBI’s Investigation of the 2001 Bacillus anthracis Mailings, Board on Life Sciences, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law, Policy and Global Affairs, National Research Council . 2011. Review of the scientific approaches used during the FBI’s investigation of the 2001 anthrax letters. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wielinga PR, Hamidjaja RA, Agren J, Knutsson R, Segerman B, Fricker M, Ehling-Schulz M, de Groot A, Burton J, Brooks T, Janse I, van Rotterdam B. 2011. A multiplex real-time PCR for identifying and differentiating B. anthracis virulent types. Int J Food Microbiol 145 Suppl 1:S137–S144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Mayerhofer-Rochel MF, Himmelbauer F, Reinprecht P, Herndler S, Weidinger H, Hellinger HJ, Szostak MP, Grass G, Ehling-Schulz M. 2025. Persistence in time: the hunt for Bacillus anthracis at a historic tannery site in Austria reveals genetic diversity thought extinct. Appl Environ Microbiol 91:e0173224. doi: 10.1128/aem.01732-24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Allerberger F, Grif K, Dierich MP, Wimmer A, Plicka H. 2002. Anthrax inhalation and lethal human infection. Lancet 359:711. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07793-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Seppey M, Manni M, Zdobnov EM. 2019. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness. Methods Mol Biol 1962:227–245. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhao Y, Wu J, Yang J, Sun S, Xiao J, Yu J. 2012. PGAP: pan-genomes analysis pipeline. Bioinformatics 28:416–418. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr655 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Raw reads and assembly data have been deposited at NCBI BioProject PRJNA1167934 (Biosample: SAMN44019342; SRA: SRS22798577, Assembly: GCF_043295875.1). The version described in this paper is the first version.

