Abstract
Altermagnets exhibit nonrelativistic spin splitting without net magnetization, offering a promising platform for next-generation spintronic devices. Although altermagnetic tunnel junctions (AMTJs) represent promising realizations, their practical applications are hindered by low tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) ratios and strong sensitivity to interfacial configurations. Here, we systematically explore the transport properties and microscopic mechanisms of AMTJs based on the d-wave altermagnet KV2Se2O. Using first-principles calculations and orbital-resolved analysis, we demonstrate that the synergy between compressed nodal-point-like spin-degenerate channels and coplanar interfacial magnetic order yields an ultrahigh intrinsic TMR above 105% for all interfacial terminations. More importantly, K-termination effectively preserves bulk spin polarization through its passivation characteristics, leading to an ultrahigh TMR up to 1012%. These results highlight the coupling between momentum-space topology and interfacial passivation as a reliable strategy for realizing giant magnetoresistive responses in altermagnetic spintronic devices.
Keywords: altermagnet, altermagnetic tunnel junction, tunneling magnetoresistance, termination, first-principles calculations


Introduction
Magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) are the fundamental building blocks of magnetoresistive random access memory (MRAM), with each memory cell incorporating a discrete storage element. − Comprising two magnetic electrodes separated by a thin insulating barrier, an MTJ operates via the tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR) effect, in which the electrical resistance is governed by the relative magnetic configuration of the electrodes. , Given that a high TMR ratio is indispensable for robust data readout, MTJs have traditionally employed ferromagnetic (FM) electrodes to provide substantial spin polarization, thereby generating large TMR ratios. , However, the intrinsic stray magnetic fields associated with ferromagnetic order constrain device miniaturization and high-density integration. While antiferromagnetic (AFM) materials present an appealing alternative due to their zero net magnetization and immunity to external magnetic perturbations, their fully compensated spin structures lead to vanishing net spin polarization, which makes it difficult to realize sizable TMR signals suitable for practical memory applications. −
The recent identification of altermagnetic (AM) materials, which exhibit nonrelativistic spin splitting in their electronic band structure, provides a promising platform to break this deadlock. , Unlike conventional collinear antiferromagnets, altermagnets break PT or Uτ symmetries (where P, T, U, and τ denote space inversion, time reversal, spin flip, and lattice translation, respectively), inducing momentum-dependent spin polarization even in the absence of spin–orbit coupling. − This characteristic grants altermagnets ferromagnet-like spin-polarization transport capabilities, while their antiparallel magnetic sublattices ensure antiferromagnet-like zero net magnetization. Consequently, even when the net tunneling current is spin-unpolarized, altermagnetic tunnel junctions (AMTJs) can still exhibit a giant TMR effect. In AMTJs, the resistance state is determined by the relative orientation of the Néel vectors in the two altermagnetic electrodes, which can be configured as parallel (P) or antiparallel (AP). The TMR effect arises from the matching and mismatching of the spin-polarized Fermi surfaces of the two electrodes within the two-dimensional Brillouin zone (2DBZ), and the TMR magnitude is directly governed by the overlap between these Fermi surfaces. ,
Currently, AMTJs based on RuO2, MnTe, NiF2, and CrSb have emerged, including all-altermagnetic architectures and altermagnetic barriers. − However, TMR ratios in these systems fail to meet industrial standards. − Furthermore, the transport process is often dominated by interfacial magnetic moment configurations rather than the intrinsic Néel vector of the altermagnet, leading to undesirable antiferromagnet-like behavior. − Most importantly, the microscopic physical origin of altermagnetic TMR, particularly the contribution mechanisms at the orbital level, lacks in-depth theoretical elucidation. To address these research gaps, the d-wave altermagnet KV2Se2O is selected as the core subject of this study. This material possesses a Néel temperature above room temperature and quasi-two-dimensional flat Fermi surfaces that form only nodal-point-like overlaps between spin channels, providing a natural structural foundation for achieving ultrahigh TMR effects. Moreover, its coplanar altermagnetic order greatly enhances transport stability and ensures robustness against interference from interfacial magnetic moment arrangements.
Despite these intrinsic advantages, the full TMR potential of KV2Se2O remains largely underexplored. Existing studies mainly focus on bulk Fermi surface features. Although the flat-band Fermi surface has been demonstrated to play an important role in achieving large TMR, the mechanisms responsible for sustaining spin polarization during transport have not yet been clearly elucidated. More importantly, a significant discrepancy exists between idealized AMTJ models and real physical systems. As a K+-intercalated material, KV2Se2O tends to cleave along K or Se planes where interlayer bonding is weakest, whereas theoretical calculations adopt V–O atomic layers as the interface. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically investigate the influence of interfacial magnetic configurations and realistic cleavage surfaces on transport properties, while elucidating the underlying microscopic mechanisms from an orbital-resolved perspective. −
In this study, we demonstrate that KV2Se2O-based AMTJs can achieve ultrahigh TMR through the momentum-space selection mechanism and real-space interfacial magnetic moment matching. Using first-principles quantum transport calculations within a vacuum-barrier model, we elucidate the microscopic origin of this effect and quantify the role of interfacial terminations. Our findings demonstrate a universally ultrahigh TMR exceeding 105% for all interface terminations. Notably, the K-terminated interface achieves a remarkably high TMR of 1012% by preserving bulk spin polarization through its passivation effect. Extending the investigation to realistic heterostructures with KTaO3 barrier yields TMR values in the range of 107–1012%, with the underlying transport mechanism remaining robust. These results highlight the critical roles of momentum-resolved spin channels and real-space interfacial configurations in enhancing TMR, and provide design principles for achieving extreme magnetoresistive responses in AMTJs.
Results and Discussion
Spin Channels and Design Principles
The TMR effect in MTJs originates from the symmetry and matching of spin-polarized states between the P and AP configurations. In AMTJs, where transport is governed by momentum-dependent spin splitting and alternating magnetic order, the TMR performance is primarily determined by the matching degree of momentum-space spin channels and the real-space arrangement of interfacial magnetic moments.
From the momentum-space perspective, the resistance originates from the matching and mismatching of the spin-polarized Fermi surfaces of the two electrodes projected onto the two-dimensional Brillouin zone (2DBZ) perpendicular to the transport direction. For a typical d-wave altermagnet, the two spin-resolved Fermi surfaces are related by a 90° rotation in momentum space (Figure a). In the P configuration (Figure b), the Néel vectors of the two electrodes are aligned, causing the spin-resolved Fermi surfaces to coincide, maximizing spin-matched transmission (Regions 1 and 2) and resulting in a low-resistance state. In contrast, in the AP configuration, reversal of one Néel vector interchanges the spin characters, leading to momentum-space mismatch of the spin-resolved transmission channels and suppressed coherent tunneling, thus producing a high-resistance state (Figure c). However, incomplete separation of opposite-spin Fermi surfaces inevitably leaves residual overlap regions (Region 0) in the projected 2DBZ. These states remain transmissive even in the AP configuration and contribute nearly equally to the conductance of both P and AP states, thereby limiting the maximum achievable TMR. Reducing the area of this overlapping region is therefore expected to enhance the TMR. In the ideal ballistic limit, with no overlap between opposite spin-resolved transmission channels, the AP state transmission vanishes and TMR formally diverges.
1.
Spin channels and design principles. (a) Schematic of the momentum-dependent spin distribution in a typical d-wave altermagnet. (b, c) Spin-resolved tunneling in altermagnet-based MTJs (AMTJs) under the ballistic transport framework. Regions 1 and 2 denote spin-up and spin-down channels; Region 0 represents the spin-degenerate overlap channel. (d, e) Tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) dependent on interfacial magnetic moment configurations. (f, g) TMR independent of interfacial configurations in coplanar arrangements. The slashed regions represent the electronic states contributed by the interface. Pink and blue correspond to spin-up and spin-down electrons, respectively.
Beyond Fermi surface topology constraints, the real-space arrangement of interfacial magnetic moments modulates the intrinsic bulk transport characteristics. In AMTJs based on RuO2, MnF2, and CrSb, atoms with opposite moments are often arranged noncoplanarly along the transport direction. , Consequently, exposure of different magnetic atomic planes leads to a mismatch between interfacial moments and the electrode Néel vector. As illustrated in Figure d, when the bulk is in a parallel configuration, the interface exhibits antiparallel coupling, suppressing the total electronic state in the P state. Conversely, interfacial parallel alignment during a bulk AP state enhances leakage (Figure e). Such conflicts between the interface and bulk not only weaken the TMR effect but can also cause the AMTJs to degenerate into an interface-dominated antiferromagnetic-like junction, obscuring the intrinsic advantages of altermagnets. However, if the magnetic atoms with opposite spins are localized within the same plane along the transport direction (Figure f and g), the interfacial magnetic arrangement aligns with the electrode Néel vector. This decouples TMR from interfacial magnetic configuration interference, making it dependent solely on bulk altermagnetic features and specific atomic interfacial termination types.
Accordingly, achieving large TMR requires synergistic optimization by selecting altermagnets with minimized spin-degenerate regions on the Fermi surface and coplanar magnetic configurations. Meeting both criteria allows the AMTJ transport to bypass interfacial interference and recover its intrinsic bulk properties. This design principle establishes a clear strategy for optimizing the TMR effect and provides a clean physical model for investigating atomic-scale termination effects and orbital-related quantum transport mechanisms.
Electronic Structure of KV2Se2O
To validate the proposed design strategy, the d-wave altermagnet KV2Se2O is selected as the electrode material, aiming to achieve a breakthrough in TMR performance by leveraging its nodal-point-like spin-degenerate channels and coplanar alternating magnetic order.
The crystal structure of KV2Se2O features a tetragonal layered lattice belonging to the P4/mmm space group, as illustrated in Figure a. After geometric optimization, the calculated lattice parameters (a = b = 3.99 Å, c = 7.48 Å) are in excellent agreement with previous reports. From an atomic-structural perspective, the Se atoms are located directly above and below the V2O planes, while adjacent V2Se2O layers are separated by K atomic layers, giving rise to a well-defined layered stacking configuration. Magnetism originates from the V atoms within the V2O plane, where neighboring V atoms carry moments of equal magnitude but in opposite directions, with the Néel vector oriented along the [001] axis. The two opposite-spin sublattices can be interconverted via [C 2||C 4z ] rotation or [C 2||M 11̅0] operation, forming a planar d-wave altermagnetic order. This arrangement ensures that sublattices with opposite spins reside entirely within the same atomic plane, forming a quintessential coplanar magnetic configuration that provides a structural foundation for avoiding interfacial magnetic mismatch.
2.
Electronic structure of KV2Se2O. (a) Crystal structure of KV2Se2O. Purple, gray, yellow, and pink spheres denote K, V, Se, and O atoms, respectively. The arrows on V atoms indicate the coplanar alternating magnetic order. (b) Calculated spin-resolved band structure of KV2Se2O. (c) Fermi surfaces of KV2Se2O. The overlap of spin-up and spin-down branches is localized at four isolated degenerate nodal points (marked by orange circles). (d–g) Symmetry-resolved band structure and orbital projections along the [001] transport direction (Γ–Z). (d) Symmetry-resolved band structure. (e–g) Orbital-projected bands for the V–d z 2, V–dxz , and V-dyz orbitals, respectively.
The calculated band structure clearly demonstrates the momentum-dependent spin splitting in KV2Se2O (Figure b). Along the high-symmetry paths Γ–X–M and Γ–Y–M, the energy bands exhibit opposite spin splittings, with a maximum splitting magnitude of approximately 1.6 eV. Two bands (Band 1 and Band 2) cross the Fermi level and contribute to the Fermi surface (Figure c). Band 1 exhibits quasi-flat dispersions along the [001] direction, whereas Band 2 forms spin-polarized Fermi pockets near the X and Y valleys. The flatness of Band 1 plays a crucial role in yielding a large TMR effect, because it compresses the extended spin-degenerate regions into four isolated degenerate nodal points, thereby suppressing the leakage current in the AP state. As a result, when charge transport occurs parallel to these nodal lines (i.e., along [001]), the projected overlap between opposite spin-resolved transmission channels in the 2DBZ becomes effectively nodal-point-like (Figure S4a and b). Thus, zero spin polarization occurs only at four isolated nodal points, while all remaining transmission channels are fully spin-polarized (Figure S4c).
To further elucidate the microscopic origin of spin-dependent tunneling, the symmetry-resolved band structure of KV2Se2O along the transport direction ([001]) is analyzed (Figure d–g). Calculations reveal that transport channels near the Fermi level are mainly governed by the Δ1 and Δ5 irreducible representations, which correspond to symmetry-resolved states classified by the C 4 v point-group symmetry along the transport direction and associated with distinct orbital compositions (Figure d). The Δ1 channel, primarily originating from the V–dz 2 orbital (Figure e), exhibits spin degeneracy along this high-symmetry path. Nevertheless, its contribution to the background current is negligible due to the aforementioned nodal-point-like characteristics. Meanwhile, the Δ5 states exhibit a strong orbital symmetry constraint, which is essential for the altermagnetic effect. The spin-up channel is dominated by the d xz orbital of V atoms (Figure f), while the spin-down channel is governed by the d yz orbital (Figure g). Since the d xz and d yz orbitals are spatially orthogonal and have distinct transverse momentum distributions, such an orbital-dominated spin transport mechanism offers a strict symmetry-matching basis for employing KV2Se2O as a high-performance AMTJ electrode.
Termination-Dependent TMR
To explore the intrinsic transport properties of KV2Se2O, we construct AMTJs with a 6 Å vacuum barrier (Figure a). Three typical interfacial terminations, namely K-termination, Se-K-termination, and Se-termination, are considered due to their lower formation energy and experimental feasibility (Figure S3 and Table S2). Owing to the characteristic crystal structure of KV2Se2O, the interfacial magnetic moment orientation is independent of the exposed magnetic layer, which eliminates interfacial magnetic interference, enabling the transport properties to directly reflect the synergistic effects of bulk altermagnetic features and interfacial termination atomic types.
3.
Termination-dependent TMR. (a) Interfacial configurations of three typical terminations: K-termination, Se-K-termination, and Se-termination. (b) Transverse momentum ( k ||)-resolved transmission for the K-termination configuration at the Fermi level. (c, d) Energy-dependent transmission spectra for the P state (c) and AP state (d) across the three termination types. (e) Calculated TMR ratios of the three terminations as a function of energy.
Figure b illustrates the transverse momentum ( k ||)-resolved transmission for the K-termination AMTJ at the Fermi level. In both P and AP configurations, the transmission spectra for spin-up and spin-down electrons exhibit identical shapes with only a π/2 spatial rotation difference, directly visualizing the d-wave symmetry inherent in KV2Se2O bulk bands. In the P state, the transmission spectra present high-value regions with contours that highly coincide with the conduction channels. Conversely, in the AP state, overall transmission is suppressed due to the spin mismatch in momentum space, with the spectra shrinking into four isolated nodal-point-like spots. This strong contrast in the tunneling landscapes leads to transmission in the P state markedly outweighing that in the AP configuration (Figure c and d). Thus, the K-termination achieves an exceptionally large TMR ratio of 1012% (Figure e).
Other interfacial terminations render transmission probability extremely sensitive to the atomic layer type. As shown in Figure c–d, transitioning from K-terminated interface to Se-terminated one significantly reduces P state transmission and increases AP state leakage current. Consequently, the TMR of the Se-K-termination drops to 4.51 × 106%, while full Se-termination further plummets to the order of 105% (Figure e). This performance degradation is further corroborated by the local density of states (LDOS) distributions (Figure S5), which confirm that the replacement of K-terminations triggers a drastic attenuation of the effective tunneling DOS within the barrier region. For all three terminations, TMR increases within the energy window, as the nodal-point-like features shift toward the M point and eventually vanish (Figure S4d–g). Nevertheless, despite large transmission fluctuations across terminations, k || -resolved transmission spectra still retain the bulk Fermi surface feature (Figure S6). Furthermore, the total current remains inherently spin-neutral regardless of the termination type (Figure S7), which is caused by the d-wave symmetry of the altermagnetic system. It is worth noting that the inclusion of spin–orbit coupling (SOC) does not alter the overall transport mechanism or the intrinsic origin of the ultrahigh TMR, as shown in Figure S9 and Table S4. Accordingly, results without SOC are mainly presented in the subsequent analysis to more clearly highlight the intrinsic transport mechanism of the system and avoid SOC-induced perturbations to the main physical behavior.
Ultrahigh TMR realization depends not only on bulk Fermi surface structure but also crucially on interfacial atomic species. For comparison, transport properties along the [100] direction are also investigated (see Figures S10 and S11). Calculations show that while [100]-oriented AMTJs exhibit distinct spin splitting and certain robustness against interfacial variations, their TMR remains significantly lower than that along the [001] direction. This contrast highlights the application potential of the [001] orientation when coupled with specific interfacial terminations. Notably, it should be emphasized that even under the most unfavorable interfacial configurations, KV2Se2O-based AMTJs still outperform currently known AMTJ systems, fully demonstrating the great potential of this material in spintronic applications.
Termination-Preserved TMR
Before analyzing the microscopic mechanisms underlying termination-dependent TMR, the thermodynamic stability of the considered surface terminations is first evaluated. Two surface slab models of KV2Se2O corresponding to the K-termination and Se-termination are presented in Figure a. The surface grand potential (Ω) is employed to systematically assess the relative stability of these terminations as a function of the potassium chemical potential (Δμ K ), with computational details provided in the Supporting Information (Section 3). The resulting chemical potential phase diagram concerning Δμ K and Δμ Se is displayed in Figure b. The calculations reveal that under K-rich conditions (ΔμK > −0.889 eV), the K-termination exhibits the lowest surface grand potential (Ω K = 0.0236), serving as the thermodynamic ground state of the system. In contrast, under Se-rich or K-poor conditions (ΔμK < −0.889 eV), the Se-termination becomes the more stable configuration. However, the experimental synthesis of KV2Se2O single crystals mainly relies on the KSe self-flux method, which provides a K-rich environment favorable for the formation of thermodynamically stable K-terminated interfaces. Moreover, analysis of competing secondary phases including K2Se, V2O5, and VSe2 shows that these phases all lie outside the stability region of KV2Se2O, further verifying the experimental feasibility of realizing high-quality K-terminated interfaces.
4.
Microscopic physical mechanism of termination-dependent transport in KV2Se2O AMTJs. (a) Surface slab models of K-termination and Se-termination. (b) The chemical potential (Δμ K , Δμ Se ) phase map. The shaded area is the thermodynamically stable range for the equilibrium growth of KV2Se2O, with yellow representing the stability region of the Se-terminated surface and purple representing that of the K-terminated surface. (c, d) Electronic band structures of the K-termination (c) and Se-termination (d) slab models. (e–g) Atom-resolved projected density of states (PDOS) for the spin-up and spin-down electronic states of V (e), Se (f), and K (g) atoms.
Subsequently, electronic structures of different surface slab models are compared (Figure c–d). Since the focus is on tunneling along the Z direction, the analysis primarily considers the band structure near the Γ point to assess transmission properties. The results show that the K-terminated interface band features are highly consistent with bulk KV2Se2O, indicating that K-termination maximally preserves the bulk’s intrinsic physical properties. In contrast, the Se-termination induces significant impurity levels within the band gap near the Fermi level, introducing deep-level defect characteristics to the system. This result is further validated by the comparison of the DOS in Figure S12a, where K-termination does not alter DOS energy distributions, only slightly increasing intensity due to more atoms, while Se-termination generates substantial charge accumulation in the valence band region, directly corresponding to the defect levels in the band structure. Additionally, real-space electronic states confirm that the Se-terminated surface has numerous extra electronic states from dangling bonds, which significantly weaken the intrinsic altermagnetic properties (Figure S12b and c).
Deep analysis of the orbital contributions from each atom in bulk KV2Se2O further elucidates the microscopic mechanism, as depicted in Figure e–g. In bulk KV2Se2O, altermagnetism primarily originates from the two orthogonal d-orbitals (d xz and d yz ) of the V atoms (Figure e), followed by the p-orbital contribution from Se atoms (Figure f), while K atoms’ s-orbital contribution is extremely weak (Figure g). This orbital weighting disparity determines the sensitivity of the electronic structure at the interface. Since Se atoms primarily contribute via p-orbitals, Se-termination exposure induces strong p-d orbital hybridization with the V atoms. This hybridization disrupts the local tetragonal symmetry of the V atoms and introduces incoherent scattering channels, acting as a bottleneck for TMR enhancement. This is further corroborated by the projected local density of states (PLDOS) along the transport direction (Figure S8). With the substitution of Se atoms, the effective density of states penetrating the vacuum barrier increases significantly in the AP state, leading to a non-negligible leakage current. Conversely, in the P state, previously continuous conduction channels are disrupted by hybridization-induced scattering, substantially reducing tunneling state density. In contrast, K-termination exhibits high electronic transparency. Since the DOS of K atoms mainly consists of s and p z orbitals (Figure g), both extending along the Z-direction (the transport direction) and contributing minimally near the Fermi level, electrons of different spin orientations experience negligible transverse scattering when traversing the interface. In this near-ideal passivation environment, P-state conduction channels maintain continuous resonant tunneling features, while strict orbital orthogonality is preserved in the AP state, ultimately achieving an intrinsic TMR effect of up to 1012%.
Enhanced TMR via Barrier Engineering
To investigate KV2Se2O performance within realistic device architectures, AMTJs are constructed using KTaO3 as the tunneling barrier (Figure a). KTaO3 is selected for its excellent lattice matching with KV2Se2O (a mismatch of less than 1%) and wide bandgap characteristics. Its band structure (Figure b) exhibits no crossing bands at the Fermi level, confirming its superior insulating nature. Complex band structure calculations reveal that KTaO3 also possesses Δ1 symmetry, which can enhance the selectivity of the tunneling process (Figure S12e). Moreover, k ||-resolved transmission calculations indicate that the rotational symmetry of KTaO3 is highly compatible with that of KV2Se2O, and a high-transmittance window appears near the center of the Brillouin zone (Figure S12f). These features ensure effective lateral momentum conservation and the momentum-space polarization of the KV2Se2O electrodes during transport, thereby enhancing the TMR effect.
5.
Enhanced TMR in KV2Se2O/KTaO3/KV2Se2O AMTJs. (a) Device configurations of AMTJs with KTaO3 barriers for K-termination and Se-termination. The outermost K and Se atoms at the interfaces are indicated in angstroms (Å). (b) Band structure of KTaO3. (c, d) Projected local density of states (PLDOS) for the K-terminated device in the P state (c) and AP state (d). (e, f) Comparison of transmission spectra between vacuum-barrier and KTaO3-barrier AMTJs for K-termination (e) and Se-termination (f). (g) Comparison of TMR ratios between this work and previously reported AMTJ systems.
The tunneling transport mechanism is intuitively reflected in the PLDOS of the device. As illustrated in Figure c–d, taking the K-termination as an example, a clear energy gap persists at the Fermi level within the barrier region for P and AP states. This confirms that the KTaO3 layer effectively decouples the Bloch states of the two electrodes, ensuring that transport is dominated by coherent tunneling. The calculated layer-resolved DOS of the supercell also supports this mechanism (Figure S13). In the P state, the barrier layer optimizes the interfacial matching (Figure c), further enhancing the Fermi-level transmission coefficient compared to the vacuum-barrier case (Figure e). Conversely, in the AP state, the absence of effective conduction channels between the left and right electrodes severely hinders electron propagation (Figure d), dramatically reducing transmission (Figure f). These dual factors substantially elevate the TMR value to 3.3 × 1012%. Furthermore, the barrier layer also increases the TMR value of the Se-terminated AMTJ to 107%. Although redundant surface states at the Se-interface increase tunneling probabilities for both P and AP states (Figure S14a–b), the overall TMR remains high because the KTaO3 barrier effectively preserves electron resonant tunneling characteristics in the P state (Figure f). Additionally, k ||-resolved transmission coefficients show that the bulk KV2Se2O Fermi surface features are precisely preserved after the introduction of the KTaO3 barrier (Figure S14c–d), with the total transmission remaining spin-neutral in both the P and AP states (Figure S15). This further confirms that the giant TMR effect originates from the perfect synergy between the intrinsic physical properties of the electrodes and the high-quality interface.
To objectively assess the potential of KV2Se2O-based AMTJs, we compare them with recent representative theoretical studies on AMTJs (Figure g). ,,− ,,, Existing AMTJs, whether optimized through barrier engineering, half-metallic electrodes, or specific crystallographic orientations, typically exhibit TMR values below 105%. However, the devices designed in this study achieve TMR values above 107%, with the potential to reach 1012% through rational interfacial termination design. Compared with recently reported AMTJs, particularly KV2Se2O-based AMTJs, this study elucidates the role of specific interface terminations in preserving spin polarization in altermagnetic systems. Specifically, the K-termination, owing to its passivation characteristics, maximally preserves the spatial orthogonality and intrinsic spin polarization of the V-3d orbitals in bulk KV2Se2O, thereby enabling exceptionally high TMR. Meanwhile, the intrinsically compressed nodal spin-degenerate channels, together with the coplanar interfacial magnetic order, provide the underlying physical basis for this termination-preserved behavior, allowing the ultrahigh TMR to be fully realized. Overall, these results not only establish the theoretical performance upper limit of KV2Se2O-based AMTJs, but also provide clear design principles and guidelines for regulating altermagnetic tunneling transport via interface termination engineering. Additional discussion on experimental feasibility and device realization is provided in the Supporting Information (Section 11).
Conclusions
In summary, this work reveals the ultrahigh TMR in KV2Se2O-based AMTJs and its underlying microscopic mechanism. The quasi-flat dispersion along [001] compresses spin-degenerate regions into isolated nodal lines, minimizing opposite-spin channel overlap and suppressing transmission in the AP configuration. Meanwhile, the robust coplanar interfacial magnetic order ensures the alignment of interfacial magnetic moments with the bulk Néel vector, eliminating the interfacial magnetic mismatch. Through atomic-level interfacial engineering, K-termination yields an ultrahigh TMR of 1012% by maximally preserving the spatial orthogonality and spin polarization of bulk V-3d orbital states. Even for Se-termination, where dangling bonds induce surface states, the system still exhibits a high TMR of 107%, which is comparable to the highest values reported for altermagnetic systems. The performance enhancement upon introducing a KTaO3 barrier further validates the robust transport stability of the junction under realistic device conditions. This study provides theoretical guidance and effective regulation strategies for the design of high-performance altermagnetic spintronic devices.
Methods
The geometric optimization, electronic structure calculations, and quantum transport simulations of KV2Se2O are performed using the QuantumATK package. , The exchange–correlation interaction is described within the spin-polarized generalized gradient approximation (SGGA) using the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional. All atoms are described using a High basis set together with PseudoDojo pseudopotentials.
For geometry optimization and electronic structure calculations, the Brillouin zone is sampled using a dense 25 × 25 × 15 Monkhorst–Pack k-point mesh. The real-space grid cutoff for the charge density is set to 80 Hartree, and the electronic temperature is fixed at 300 K. Structural relaxation is continued until the residual force on each atom is smaller than 0.01 eV/Å. With these parameters, both the optimized geometries and the resulting band structures show good agreement with available experimental data, ensuring the reliability of the calculations. The effects of Hubbard-U and SOC are further tested, and both are found to have negligible influence on the band structure (Figure S1).
Quantum transport properties are investigated within the density functional theory (DFT) combined with the nonequilibrium Green’s function (NEGF) formalism. − In the Green’s function approach, an infinitesimal imaginary broadening parameter of 0.001 Hartree is introduced to ensure numerical stability of the energy integration and to avoid unphysical oscillations. The device is modeled as a two-probe system, consisting of a central scattering region sandwiched between two semi-infinite symmetric electrodes. For transport calculations, the real-space grid cutoff is increased to 150 Hartree. In the self-consistent transport calculations, a 15 × 15 × 150 k-point mesh is used. For the calculation of k ||-resolved transmission, the two-dimensional Brillouin zone is sampled using a dense meshes of 500 × 500 k points, which has been verified by convergence tests (Figure S2 and Table S1).
In crystalline MTJs operating in the ballistic regime and in the absence of SOC, both spin and the transverse wave vector k || is conserved. Consequently, the longitudinal tunneling conductance per unit area for spin σ is given by . Here represents the spin-resolved number of conduction channels at transverse wave vector k ||. We then define the k ||-resolved spin polarization p ||( k ||) as
| 1 |
The TMR effect in MTJs fundamentally arises from the k ||-resolved spin polarization p ||( k ||) matching conditions of two metal electrodes in the P and AP configurations.
TMR is defined as
| 2 |
where TP and TAP denote the total transmission in the P state and AP state, respectively.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) (Grant No. 52501308), the Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province (Grant Nos. 2025CXGC020107 and 2021SFGC1001), the Key Technology Research and Development Program of Shandong Province (No. 2025CXGX010406), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (No. ZR2025QC1106). This work is also supported by the Special Funding in the Project of the Taishan Scholar Construction Engineering and the program of Jinan Science and Technology Bureau (2020GXRC019), as well as the new material demonstration platform construction project from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (2020-370104-34-03-043952-01-11). Research at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln (UNL) was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. DMR-2316665) and UNL’s Grand Challenges Catalyst Award.
A version of this manuscript has been deposited as a preprint: Guo, J.; Mavani, H.; Fang, W.; Tang, J.; Li, W.; Wu, W.; Li, H.; Tsymbal, E.Y.; Zhang, L. Termination-Preserved Ultra-high Tunneling Magnetoresistance in Altermagnetic KV2Se2O, 2026, arXiv:2605.18493, arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18493 (accessed June 13, 2026).
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsnano.6c05425.
Hubbard-U and spin-orbit coupling tests for KV2Se2O; convergence test of the k-point mesh density; interfacial terminations and stability of KV2Se2O; transport mechanisms along the [001] and [100] directions; influence of spin-orbit coupling on transport properties; electronic structures of KV2Se2O and KTaO3; transport mechanism of KV2Se2O/KTaO3/KV2Se2O AMTJs; robustness of TMR under realistic perturbations; angle-dependent TMR in KV2Se2O/KTaO3/KV2Se2O AMTJs; experimental feasibility and device realization of KV2Se2O-based AMTJs (PDF)
J.G. performed the first-principles and transport calculations, analyzed the results, prepared the figures, and wrote the initial draft. H.M. performed additional calculations and contributed to data analysis. W.F., J.T., and W.L. contributed to discussion and analysis. W.W., H.L., E.Y.T., and L.Z. acquired funding for the project. E.Y.T. contributed to manuscript review and editing. L.Z. conceived the idea, supervised the project, and contributed to manuscript revision. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
References
- Worledge D. C., Hu G.. Spin-transfer torque magnetoresistive random access memory technology status and future directions. Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng. 2024;1:730–747. doi: 10.1038/s44287-024-00111-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chappert C., Fert A., Van Dau F. N.. The emergence of spin electronics in data storage. Nat. Mater. 2007;6:813–823. doi: 10.1038/nmat2024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jia Z., Zhao M., Chen Q., Tian Y., Liu L., Zhang F., Zhang D., Ji Y., Camargo B., Ye K.. et al. Spintronic Devices upon 2D Magnetic Materials and Heterojunctions. ACS Nano. 2025;19:9452–9483. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c14168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuasa S., Nagahama T., Fukushima A., Suzuki Y., Ando K.. Giant room-temperature magnetoresistance in single-crystal Fe/MgO/Fe magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat. Mater. 2004;3:868–871. doi: 10.1038/nmat1257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wolf S. A., Awschalom D. D., Buhrman R. A., Daughton J. M., von Molnár S., Roukes M. L., Chtchelkanova A. Y., Treger D. M.. Spintronics: A Spin-Based Electronics Vision for the Future. Science. 2001;294:1488–1495. doi: 10.1126/science.1065389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moodera J. S., Mathon G.. Spin polarized tunneling in ferromagnetic junctions. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1999;200:248–273. doi: 10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00515-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu W., Zhu Y., Zhou T., Zhang X., Lin H., Cui Q., Yan F., Wang Z., Deng Y., Yang H.. et al. Large and tunable magnetoresistance in van der Waals ferromagnet/semiconductor junctions. Nat. Commun. 2023;14(1):5371. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41077-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L., Zhou J., Li H., Shen L., Feng Y. P.. Recent progress and challenges in magnetic tunnel junctions with 2D materials for spintronic applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2021;8(2):021308. doi: 10.1063/5.0032538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Baltz V., Manchon A., Tsoi M., Moriyama T., Ono T., Tserkovnyak Y.. Antiferromagnetic spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 2018;90:015005. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jungwirth T., Sinova J., Manchon A., Marti X., Wunderlich J., Felser C.. The multiple directions of antiferromagnetic spintronics. Nat. Phys. 2018;14:200–203. doi: 10.1038/s41567-018-0063-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shao D.-F., Tsymbal E. Y.. Antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions for spintronics. Npj Spintronics. 2024;2(1):13. doi: 10.1038/s44306-024-00014-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen X., Higo T., Tanaka K., Nomoto T., Tsai H., Idzuchi H., Shiga M., Sakamoto S., Ando R., Kosaki H.. et al. Octupole-driven magnetoresistance in an antiferromagnetic tunnel junction. Nature. 2023;613:490–495. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05463-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jang J., Srivastava P. K., Joe M., Jung S.-G., Park T., Kim Y., Lee C.. Half-Metallic Antiferromagnetic 2D Nonlayered Cr2Se3 Nanosheets. ACS Nano. 2025;19:999–1006. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c12646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Šmejkal L., Sinova J., Jungwirth T.. Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism. Phys. Rev. X. 2022;12:040501. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.040501. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fan Y., Wang Q., Wang W., Wang D., Huang Q., Wang Z., Han X., Chen Y., Bai L., Yan S.. et al. Robust Magnetic-Field-Free Perpendicular Magnetization Switching by Manipulating Spin Polarization Direction in RuO2/[Pt/Co/Pt] Heterojunctions. ACS Nano. 2024;18:26350–26358. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.4c09004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hayami S., Yanagi Y., Kusunose H.. Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Ordering. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2019;88:123702. doi: 10.7566/JPSJ.88.123702. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan L.-D., Wang Z., Luo J.-W., Rashba E. I., Zunger A.. Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. B. 2020;102:014422. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.014422. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan L.-D., Wang Z., Luo J.-W., Zunger A.. Prediction of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2021;5:014409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.014409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Šmejkal L., Sinova J., Jungwirth T.. Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Nonrelativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry. Phys. Rev. X. 2022;12:031042. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031042. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shao D.-F., Zhang S.-H., Li M., Eom C.-B., Tsymbal E. Y.. Spin-neutral currents for spintronics. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):7061. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26915-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang Y.-Y., Wang Z.-A., Samanta K., Zhang S.-H., Xiao R.-C., Lu W. J., Sun Y. P., Tsymbal E. Y., Shao D.-F.. Prediction of giant tunneling magnetoresistance in Ru2O/Ti2O/Ru2O (110) antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. B. 2023;108:174439. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.174439. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Šmejkal L., Hellenes A. B., González-Hernández R., Sinova J., Jungwirth T.. Giant and Tunneling Magnetoresistance in Unconventional Collinear Antiferromagnets with Nonrelativistic Spin-Momentum Coupling. Phys. Rev. X. 2022;12:011028. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.12.011028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shao D.-F., Jiang Y.-Y., Ding J., Zhang S.-H., Wang Z.-A., Xiao R.-C., Gurung G., Lu W. J., Sun Y. P., Tsymbal E. Y.. Neel Spin Currents in Antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2023;130:216702. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.216702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xu S., Zhang Z., Mahfouzi F., Huang Y., Cheng H., Dai B., Kim J., Zhu D., Cai W., Shi K.. et al. Giant Spin-flop magnetoresistance in a collinear antiferromagnetic tunnel junction. Nat. Commun. 2025;16(1):8370. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-62695-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Osumi T., Souma S., Aoyama T., Yamauchi K., Honma A., Nakayama K., Takahashi T., Ohgushi K., Sato T.. Observation of a giant band splitting in altermagnetic MnTe. Phys. Rev. B. 2024;109:115102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.115102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hariki A., Sakurai K., Okauchi T., Kuneš J.. Separating altermagnetic and ferromagnetic effects in X-ray magnetic dichroism of rutile NiF2 . NPJ. Quantum Mater. 2025;10(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41535-025-00753-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou Z., Cheng X., Hu M., Chu R., Bai H., Han L., Liu J., Pan F., Song C.. Manipulation of the altermagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry. Nature. 2025;638:645–650. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08436-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu Y., Liu S., Cui Q., Jiang J., Yang H., Zhou T., Liu B.. Tunneling magnetoresistance in altermagnetic tunnel junctions with the half-metal electrode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2025;127(8):082401. doi: 10.1063/5.0283614. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Noh S., Kim G.-H., Lee J., Jung H., Seo U., So G., Lee J., Lee S., Park M., Yang S.. et al. Tunneling Magnetoresistance in Altermagnetic RuO2-Based Magnetic Tunnel Junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025;134(24):246703. doi: 10.1103/nrk5-5zrj. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L., Ni G., Wu X., Gao G.. All-Altermagnetic Tunnel Junction of RuO2/NiF2/RuO2 . Chin. Phys. Lett. 2026;43(4):040711. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/43/4/040711. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chi B., Jiang L., Zhu Y., Yu G., Wan C., Zhang J., Han X.. Crystal-facet-oriented altermagnets for detecting ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic states by giant tunneling magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2024;21:034038. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.034038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L., Ni G., He J., Gao G.. Above room temperature multiferroic tunnel junction with the altermagnetic metal CrSb. Phys. Rev. B. 2025;112(6):064401. doi: 10.1103/j559-slg4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yang L., Jiang Y.-Y., Guo X.-Y., Zhang S.-H., Xiao R.-C., Lu W.-J., Wang L., Sun Y.-P., Tsymbal E. Y., Shao D.-F.. Interface-controlled antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions. Newton. 2025;1:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.newton.2025.100142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Li X., Zhu M., Dong J., Wu K., Zheng F., Zhang J.. Tunneling Magnetoresistance Effect in Altermagnetic Tunnel Junctions with g-Wave Splitting. Chin. Phys. Lett. 2025;42(10):100701. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/42/10/100701. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang B., Hu M., Bai J., Song Z., Mu C., Qu G., Li W., Zhu W., Pi H., Wei Z.. et al. A metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet. Nat. Phys. 2025;21:754–759. doi: 10.1038/s41567-025-02822-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lai J., Yu T., Liu P., Liu L., Xing G., Chen X.-Q., Sun Y.. d-Wave Flat Fermi Surface in Altermagnets Enables Maximum Charge-to-Spin Conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025;135(25):256702. doi: 10.1103/bf1n-sxdl. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang X., Fang S., Yang Z., Ho P., Lu J., Ang Y. S.. Altermagnetic Flatband-Driven Fermi Surface Geometry for Giant Tunneling Magnetoresistance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2026;36(35):e31921. doi: 10.1002/adfm.202531921. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- He J.-J., Liu L.-X., Guo Y.-D., Yuan J.-R., Yan X.-H., Sanvito S.. Tunnel-like transport and extremely large magnetoresistance in an all-metal junction incorporating the altermagnet KV2Se2O. Phys. Rev. B. 2026;113(6):L060410. doi: 10.1103/dltj-4cff. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou L.-X., Ren Y.-T., Chen Y.-T., Lv X.-H., Jin C.-D., Zhang H., Gong P.-L., Lian R.-Q., Wang R.-N., Wang J.-L.. et al. Quasi-bonding-induced gap states in metal/two-dimensional semiconductor junctions: Route for Schottky barrier height reduction. Phys. Rev. B. 2022;105:224105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.105.224105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sheikh R. R., Ghosh R. K.. Impact of interfacial termination on L10-MnAl spin torque perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions: A DFT-NEGF study. J. Appl. Phys. 2025;138(23):233903. doi: 10.1063/5.0297144. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Liu X., Yu G., He K., Xiao Y., Zhu S., Shen L.. Origin and enhancement of magnetoresistance in antiferromagnetic tunnel junctions: Spin channel selection rules. Mater. Horiz. 2025;12:3485–3493. doi: 10.1039/D4MH01453G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang Z., Yang X., Wang J., Li Q., Peng R., Lee C. H., Ang L. K., Lu J., Ang Y. S., Fang S.. Unconventional thickness scaling of coherent tunnel magnetoresistance in altermagnets. Phys. Rev. B. 2025;112(20):205202. doi: 10.1103/2thy-fzzj. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lin H., Si J., Zhu X., Cai K., Li H., Kong L., Yu X., Wen H.-H.. Structure and physical properties of CsV2Se2‑xO and V2Se2O. Phys. Rev. B. 2018;98:075132. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.075132. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Xu Y., Zhang H., Feng M., Tian F.. Electronic structure, magnetic transition, and Fermi surface instability of the room-temperature altermagnet KV2Se2O. Phys. Rev. B. 2025;112(12):125141. doi: 10.1103/r8nc-dpt8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Yu Z.-L., Ma Q.-R., Zhao Y.-Q., Liu B., Cai M.-Q.. Surface TerminationA Key Factor to Influence Electronic and Optical Properties of CsSnI3 . J. Phys. Chem. C. 2018;122:9275–9282. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b11976. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Cheng J., Behtash M., Tang W., Luo J., Yang K.. First-principles studies of polar perovskite KTaO3 surfaces: Structural reconstruction, charge compensation, and stability diagram. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018;20:18515–18527. doi: 10.1039/C8CP02540A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li K., Guo Y., Robertson J., Zhao W., Lu H.. Designing van der Waals magnetic tunnel junctions with high tunnel magnetoresistance via Brillouin zone filtering. Nanoscale. 2024;16:19228–19238. doi: 10.1039/D4NR02717E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chi B., Jiang L., Zhu Y., Yu G., Wan C., Han X.. Anisotropic spin filtering by an altermagnetic barrier in magnetic tunnel junctions. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2025;23:014013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.014013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Smidstrup S., Markussen T., Vancraeyveld P., Wellendorff J., Schneider J., Gunst T., Verstichel B., Stradi D., Khomyakov P. A., Vej-Hansen U. G.. et al. QuantumATK: An integrated platform of electronic and atomic-scale modelling tools. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 2020;32(1):015901. doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ab4007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guo J., Dai X., Zhang L., Li H.. Electron Transport Properties of Graphene/WS2 Van Der Waals Heterojunctions. Molecules. 2023;28:6866. doi: 10.3390/molecules28196866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perdew J. P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M.. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:3865–3868. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandbyge M., Mozos J.-L., Ordejón P., Taylor J., Stokbro K.. Density-functional method for nonequilibrium electron transport. Phys. Rev. B. 2002;65:165401. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165401. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor J., Guo H., Wang J.. Ab initio modeling of quantum transport properties of molecular electronic devices. Phys. Rev. B. 2001;63:245407. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.245407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Guo J., Fang W., Huang J., Zhang L., Wu W., Li H.. Nonlinear transport behaviors in anti-aromatic cyclo[n]carbon-based (n = 4k) molecular devices. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2025;13:6527–6538. doi: 10.1039/D4TC04033C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
A version of this manuscript has been deposited as a preprint: Guo, J.; Mavani, H.; Fang, W.; Tang, J.; Li, W.; Wu, W.; Li, H.; Tsymbal, E.Y.; Zhang, L. Termination-Preserved Ultra-high Tunneling Magnetoresistance in Altermagnetic KV2Se2O, 2026, arXiv:2605.18493, arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.18493 (accessed June 13, 2026).





