Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Public Health logoLink to Iranian Journal of Public Health
. 2025 Nov;54(11):2511–2523. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i11.20395

Spatial and Temporal Analysis of Meningitis Cumulative Incidence in Iran, 2011–2022

Maryam Ghalandari 1, Ali Dehghani 2, Seyed Mohsen Zahraei 3, Mohammad Hassan Lotfi 2, Farzan Madadizadeh 1,4,*
PMCID: PMC13348902  PMID: 42428746

Abstract

Background:

Meningitis is a public health challenge and one of the plans of the WHO is to defeat meningitis by 2030. This study was conducted to determine the trend of cumulative incidence and to draw a geographic map of meningitis in Iran.

Methods:

Data on the cases of Fever and Neurological Symptoms Syndrome was obtained from the national surveillance system from 2011 to 2022. The cumulative incidence of meningitis was calculated for each year. Joinpoint version 5.4.0 and ArcGIS Desktop (ArcMap) 10.8.2 were used to investigate the trend of the disease incidence and identify the high-risk areas, respectively.

Results:

Overall, 18,500 (24.35%) of the total cases were reported as confirmed and probable cases of meningitis. The cumulative incidence of bacterial meningitis decreased significantly in all age groups (P<0.05). The incidence of viral meningitis decreased in all ages and the population under 5 years (P<0.05). The incidence of Hib meningitis decreased in the population under 5 yr from 2015–2019 (P<0.05). The incidence of meningitis from all forms decreased in all ages and populations under 5 yr but increased in the population over 5 yr from 2011 to 2019, though these changes were not statistically significant.

Conclusion:

The incidence of bacterial and viral meningitis has decreased in Iran similar to most parts of the world. The decrease in the incidence of Hib meningitis after the implementation of the vaccination in children under 5 yr emphasizes the importance of continuing Hib vaccination and integrating pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccinations into the national vaccination program.

Keywords: Incidence, Meningitis, Bacterial, Haemophilus, Viral, Spatio-temporal analysis, Iran

Introduction

Meningitis is the most common form of infectious disease of the nervous system (1) and despite the progress in the production of strong antimicrobial drugs, the invention of vaccines, and improvements in the process of disease care, it is one of the main challenges of public health in worldwide (2, 3). Meningitis is caused by viral, bacterial, and fungal infectious agents (4) as well as non-infectious causes like drugs and autoimmune diseases (5). Acute viral meningitis is the main cause of non-infectious meningitis (4) and more than 80% of bacterial meningitis cases are caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus), Haemophilus Influenzae type b (Hib) meningitis, and Neisseria meningitidis (meningococcus) (6).

The incidence rate of the disease varies from one region to another, from approximately 0.9 per 100,000 person-years in high-income countries to 80 per 100,000 person-years in low-income countries (7). The annual incidence of meningitis in Iran varies from 2.27 per 100,000 population in 2008 to 2.72 per 100,000 population in 2013 (8). More than 2.5 million new cases of bacterial meningitis and more than 236,000 deaths were reported worldwide in 2019 (9). In low-income countries, bacterial meningitis has a mortality rate of up to 54%, and up to 24% of those who survive suffer from neurological complications (7).

Risk factors such as malnutrition, family overcrowding, HIV infection, lack of immunization, indoor air pollution, and sickle cell disease make people susceptible to meningitis (10). The clinical diagnosis of meningitis is based on the presence of classic symptoms like fever, headache, and neck stiffness, or sudden onset of hemorrhagic rash with fever and its laboratory diagnosis including the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), blood, and petechial lesions smears (11). Diagnosis can be challenging due to non-specific symptoms, particularly in infants, and the limitation in the availability of timely CSF analysis (10).

Viral meningitis can recover without treatment (12), but bacterial meningitis poses a significant global burden, especially in low-income countries. The main treatment of the disease is antibiotics and in some cases surgery. However, in the absence of timely diagnosis and correct treatment, it may lead to irreversible damage such as long-term neurological consequences, hearing loss, learning disability, motor impairment, epilepsy, and death (5). Recognizing the importance of this public health challenge, WHO has launched a roadmap to defeat meningitis by 2030, aiming to eliminate epidemics, reduce cases and deaths, and improve the quality of life (13).

In Iran, the population-based national surveillance system provides valuable data on disease demographics, trends, potential epidemics, and geographic distribution, which is crucial for addressing this public health challenge (8).

Epidemiological investigation and determination of disease trends in different regions of the world is essential. Comparing the trend and geographical distribution of meningitis helps us to identify areas with a high concentration of the disease and provides an opportunity to allocate the facilities, control the disease, and prevent epidemics on a large scale. This study was conducted to determine the trend of cumulative incidence and draw a geographic map of meningitis in Iran.

Methods

This descriptive study was conducted in Iran, a country located in West Asia with an area of 1,648,195 km2. This country includes 31 provinces and its population was estimated at 79,926,270 in 2016 census.

Data source

The study collected nationwide data on fever and neurological symptoms syndrome cases, including demographic details, diagnostic information, vaccination history, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. Data was extracted from the national surveillance system in an Excel file from Mar 21, 2011, to Mar 20, 2022.

Case definition

The diagnosis of meningitis was based on national guidelines that classified patients into suspected, probable, and confirmed cases. A suspected case was any person with a fever above 38.5 °C and at least one meningeal symptom, such as neck stiffness, decreased consciousness, or other meningeal symptoms. A suspected case was considered probable if their CSF test showed abnormalities like turbidity, elevated white blood cells, increased protein, decreased glucose, and the presence of specific bacteria in gram staining. A suspected and probable case was classified as confirmed if they had positive cultures identifying the causative bacteria in the CSF or blood, or if pathogenic antigens were detected through the Latex Agglutination Test (8).

Statistical analysis

The cumulative incidence of meningitis disease (confirmed and probable cases), bacterial and viral meningitis, Hib meningitis, and Syndrome were calculated separately for each year using the Country population as the denominator in 2012, and 2017 Censuses, and the population forecast for the year 2021. The linear interpolation method was used to obtain the population for the intervening years. Cumulative incidence of disease was reported per 100,000 population. Bacterial meningitis included Streptococcus pneumoniae, (Hib) meningitis and Neisseria meningitidis.

Joinpoint regression analysis was used to identify trend significant changes in the incidence of disease. The Average Annual Percent Changes (AAPCs) and the Annual Percent Changes (APCs) were calculated with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI)(14). The best-fit model was chosen based on the weighted Bayesian information criterion.

AAPCs were calculated for five predetermined fixed intervals: (a) the entire study period (2011–2022), (b) before the implementation of the Hib vaccination program (2011–2014), (c) after the implementation of the vaccination program and before the COVID-19 pandemic (2015–2019), (d) period after the COVID-19 pandemic (2020–2022), (e) during the period without considering the COVID-19 pandemic years (2011–2019).

In Iran, the implementation of the Hib vaccination program was on Nov 18, 2014, and the post-COVID-19 period was after the announcement of the pandemic on Mar 4, 2020.

Qualitative data was reported based on frequency and percentage. Cumulative incidence was calculated using Microsoft Excel 2016. ArcGIS Desktop (ArcMap) 10.8.2 was used to draw a geographical map of the cumulative incidence of meningitis for each province in Iran.

Joinpoint software version 5.4.0 was used to determine the trend of disease incidence. Time trends were considered statistically significant when APCs or AAPCs had a P-value<0.05.

The Ethics Committee of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences reviewed and approved the study protocol. (Ethic code: IR.SSU.SPH.REC.1402.118.).

Results

Overall, 75,950 cases of fever and neurological symptoms syndrome had been reported from 2011 to 2022. 18,500 (24.3%) of the total cases were reported as confirmed and probable cases (meningitis disease). Of the total meningitis cases, the age of 8714 (47.3%) patients was less than 5 years. The gender of 11553 (62.7%) patients was male. 14443 (78.4%) patients were residents of the city. 2779 (15.3%) patients were employed. The kind of meningitis was other things in 1687 (70.8%) of confirmed cases and the outcome of death was reported in 581 (3.1%) meningitis patients (Table 1).

Table 1:

The epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients

Variables Levels n (%)
Classification of Fever and Neurological Symptoms Syndrome Suspected 57450(75.6)
Probable 16118(21.2)
Confirmed 2382(3.1)
Age group (probable and confirmed Cases) Under 5 years 8714(47.3)
5–14 years 2626(14.3)
15–44 years 4027(21.9)
45–64 years 1846(10.0)
>65 1196(6.5)
Sex (probable and confirmed Cases) Female 6873(37.3)
Male 11553(62.7)
Occupation (probable and confirmed Cases) Children & Neonate 9893(54.6)
Employed 2779(15.3)
Housewife 2219(12.2)
Student 2025(11.2)
Unemployed 501(2.8)
Retired 475(2.6)
Other (a prisoner and soldier) 231(1.3)
Residency Area (probable and confirmed Cases) Urban 14443(78.4)
Rural, nomads, and mobile 3984(21.6)
Kind of Meningitis (confirmed cases) S. pneumonia 385(16.2)
N. meningitis 194(8.1)
H. influenza 116(4.9)
Other things 1687(70.8)
Outcome of the disease (Suspected & probable and confirmed cases) Improved 54370(71.6)
Death 1399(1.8)
Unknown 20181(26.6)
Outcome of the disease (probable and confirmed cases) Improved 13660(73.8)
Death 581(3.1)
Unknown 4259(23.0)

Information related to clinical symptoms was collected since 2016 in Iran. Overall, 36,773 cases of fever and neurological symptoms syndrome and 9,276 cases of meningitis were examined in terms of symptoms of fever, headache, vomiting, decreased consciousness, neck stiffness, seizures, Kernig, bulging fontanelle, and brudzinski. Fever was the most common sign in patients. It was reported in 88.0% of all cases and 87.4% of meningitis cases. Brudzinski was observed in 1.1% of all cases and 3.2% of meningitis cases (Fig. 1). The highest frequency of cases of syndrome and meningitis were reported in the summer, spring, autumn, and winter seasons, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Clinical symptoms of meningitis and cases of fever and neurological symptoms syndrome in Iran

Fig. 2:

Fig. 2:

Frequency of cases of meningitis and fever and neurological symptoms syndrome by season

The highest and lowest cumulative incidence of meningitis was 2.78 and 0.87 per 100,000 population in the years 2013 and 2020 in all ages.

The results incidence of the syndrome and meningitis caused by viral, bacterial, and Hib meningitis are shown in Table 2.

Table 2:

Cumulative incidence of kinds of meningitis and fever and neurological symptoms syndrome

Year Age Group Bacterial Meningitis Viral Meningitis Hib Meningitis Meningitis All cases
Incidence (95%CI) Incidence (95%CI) Incidence (95%CI) Incidence (95%CI) Incidence (95%CI)
2011 total 0.23(0.19–0.26) 1.14(1.10–1.20) 0.05(0.03–0.06) 2.24(2.13–2.30) 9.18(8.96–9.39)
under 5 years 1.16(0.89–1.42) 8.50(7.80–9.19) 0.40(0.24–0.56) 12.85(12.0–13.70) 67.56(65.52–69.6)
over 5 years 0.14(0.11–0.17) 0.47(0.40–0.50) 0.02(0.01–0.03) 1.26(1.18–1.30) 3.85(3.71–4.00)
2012 total 0.24(0.20–0.27) 1.30(1.20–1.39) 0.04(0.02–0.05) 2.40(2.29–2.51) 9.75(9.50–9.97)
under 5 years 1.45(1.16–1.75) 9.90(9.20–10.80) 0.38(0.23–0.53) 13.80(12.90–14.7) 70.51(68.46–72.6)
over 5 years 0.12(0.10–0.15) 0.50(0.45–0.60) 0.01(0.00–0.01) 1.33(1.24–1.42) 4.10(3.95–4.25)
2013 total 0.31(0.27–0.35) 1.58(1.50–1.70) 0.09(0.07–0.11) 2.78(2.66–2.89) 10.95(10.7–11.19)
under 5 years 1.80(1.47–2.12) 10.60(9.80–11.00) 0.62(0.43–0.82) 14.50(13.6–15.40) 72.42(70.36–74.5)
over 5 years 0.17(0.14–0.20) 0.70(0.67–0.8) 0.04(0.02–0.05) 1.66(1.56–1.75) 5.13(4.97–5.30)
2014 total 0.27(0.24–0.31) 1.54(1.50–1.60) 0.08(0.06–0.10) 2.58(2.47–2.70) 10.56(10.33–10.8)
under 5 years 1.62(1.31–1.92) 10.35(9.60–11.0) 0.74(0.54–0.95) 14.70(13.80–15.70) 69.53(67.54–71.5)
over 5 years 0.15(0.12–0.17) 0.69(0.60–0.80) 0.02(0.01–0.03) 1.41(1.33–1.50) 4.78(4.60–4.94)
2015 total 0.18(0.15–0.21) 1.42(1.30–1.50) 0.05(0.04–0.07) 1.98(1.88–2.08) 10.38(10.15–10.6)
under 5 years 1.00(0.76–1.23) 9.00(8.30–9.71) 0.38(0.23–0.52) 10.56(9.80–11.30) 67.23(65.3–69.16)
over 5 years 0.10(0.08–0.13) 0.69(0.60–0.80) 0.02(0.01–0.03) 1.15(1.07–1.23) 4.89(4.70–5.05)
2016 total 0.24(0.21–0.28) 1.24(1.20–1.30) 0.06(0.04–0.08) 2.29(2.18–2.39) 9.09(8.88–9.30)
under 5 years 1.35(1.08–1.62) 8.68(8.0–9.40) 0.42(0.27–0.57) 12.90(12.10–13.80) 58.33(56.55–60.1)
over 5 years 0.14(0.11–0.16) 0.52(0.50–0.60) 0.03(0.01–0.04) 1.25(1.17–1.33) 4.29(4.14–4.45)
2017 total 0.23(0.20–0.27) 1.28(1.20–1.40) 0.04(0.03–0.06) 1.98(1.89–2.08) 8.02(7.83–8.22)
under 5 years 1.05(0.81–1.28) 9.20(8.50–9.91) 0.30(0.18–0.43) 10.55(9.80–11.30) 52.36(50.7–54.02)
over 5 years 0.15(0.13–0.18) 0.50(0.45–0.60) 0.02(0.01–0.03) 1.14(1.07–1.22) 3.66(3.53–3.80)
2018 total 0.26(0.23–0.30) 1.50(1.40–1.60) 0.07(0.06–0.09) 2.50 (2.41–2.63) 9.93(9.71–10.14)
under 5 years 1.19(0.94–1.45) 9.80(9.10–10.60) 0.38(0.23–0.52) 12.3(11.50–13.10) 55.95(54.22–57.7)
over 5 years 0.17(0.14–0.20) 0.70(0.67–0.80) 0.05(0.03–0.06) 1.58(1.49–1.67) 5.50(5.33–5.66)
2019 total 0.13(0.11–0.16) 0.94(0.90–1.00) 0.02(0.01–0.03) 2.36(2.25–2.46) 8.82(8.60–9.02)
under 5 years 0.57(0.40–0.75) 6.20 (5.65–6.80) 0.13(0.04–0.21) 11.10(10.30–11.90) 49.99(48.3–51.65)
over 5 years 0.09(0.07–0.11) 0.45(0.40–0.50) 0.01(0.01–0.02) 1.55(1.46–1.64) 5.02(4.86–5.18)
2020 total 0.02(0.01–0.03) 0.27(0.20–0.30) 0.00(0.00–0.01) 0.87(0.81–0.94) 3.30(3.18–3.40)
under 5 years 0.19(0.09–0.30) 2.29(1.90–2.70) 0.04(0.01–0.10) 6.67(6.05–7.29) 25.95(24.7–27.20)
over 5 years 0.01(0.00–0.02) 0.10(0.08–0.10) 0.00(0.00–0.00) 0.37(0.32–0.41) 1.32(1.24–1.40)
2021 total 0.02(0.01–0.04) 0.30(0.27–0.30) 0.00(0.00–0.00) 1.30(1.23–1.38) 5.74(5.58–5.90)
under 5 years 0.11(0.03–0.19) 2.61(2.20–3.00) 0.00(0.00–0.00) 8.82(8.10–9.55) 39.12(37.6–40.65)
over 5 years 0.02(0.01–0.03) 0.11(0.10–0.10) 0.00(0.00– 0.68(0.63–0.74) 2.99(2.86–3.11)

Joinpoint regression analysis showed the cumulative incidence of bacterial meningitis decreased significantly in all age groups and the incidence of viral meningitis decreased significantly in all ages, and in the population under 5 years in the years 2015–2019 and 2011–2019 (P<0.05).

The cumulative incidence of Hib meningitis decreased significantly in the age group under 5 years in the years 2015–2019 (AAPC:−24.2–%95CI: −43.5–−11), (P<0.05). So that, a 24% reduction in the average incidence was seen annually in the population under 5 years in this period. This decreasing trend was observed in all age groups in 2011–2019, although it was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

The cumulative incidence of viral, bacterial, and Hib meningitis decreased significantly in all ages and both age groups in the years 2020–2022 (P<0.05).

The incidence of meningitis from all forms decreased in all ages and age groups under 5 years but increased in age groups over 5 years in the years 2011–2019 and 2015–2019. However, these changes were not statistically significant. A decreasing trend of incidence was observed in all ages, and in both age groups in the years 2020–2022 that was not statistically significant(P>0.05).

The cumulative incidence of the syndrome has significantly decreased in all periods, in the population under 5 yr old, (AAPC: −6.4–% 95CI: −9.8–−3.3) (P<0.05). Models without any breakpoints were selected as the best models for the syndrome in all age groups from 2011 to 2022. Since the model did not show any break-point, AAPCs were the same as APCs. The results are shown in Table 3 and Fig. 3(a–e).

Table 3:

Analysis of the cumulative incidence kinds of Meningitis in Iran, by age groups during the years 2011–2022

Agent/ Age Group Year APC 2011–22 2011–14 2015–19 2020–22 2011–19
APC (95% CI) AAPC (95% CI) AAPC (95% CI) AAPC (95% CI) AAPC (95% CI) AAPC (95% CI)
Bacterial Meningitis
All ages 2011–18 −0.06(−5.5–7.2) −21.8 (−30.5–−15.7) * −0.06(−5.5–7.2) −18.5(−26.1–−5.0) * −55.8(−76.5–−38.1) * −9.7(−14.6–−4.4) *
2018–22 −55.8(−76.5–−38.1) *
under 5 years 2011–18 −3.6(−9.1–3.9) −23.7(−32.8–−17.3) * −3.6(−9.1 −3.9) −20.6(−28.4–−6.2) * −55.7(−80.1–−36.9) * −12.5(−17.3–−6.2) *
2018–22 −55.7 (−80.1–−36.9) *
over 5 yr 2011–18 2.5(−4.4–13.0) −19.0(−32.0–−12.3) * 2.5(−4.4–13.0) −15.8(−26.1–−1.7) * −53.3(−83.0–−33.7) * −7.1(−13.3–−0.5) *
2018–22 −53.3(−83.0–−33.7)
Viral Meningitis
All ages 2011–18 1.4(−4.3–11.4) −15.1(−24.6–−10.1) * 1.4(−4.3–11.4) −12.6(−20.9–−1.7) * −43.98(−71.8–−28) * −5.8(−10.5–−0.1) *
2018–22 −43.98(−71.8–−28) *
under 5 yr 2011–18 −0.29(−4.2–4.99) −13.95(−18.8–−10.7) * −0.29(−4.2–4.99) −11.8(−17.1–−3.6) * −38.9 (−54.9–−27.2) * −6.2(−9.2–−2.8) *
2018–22 −38.99(−54.9–−27) *
over 5 yr 2011–18 2.95(−5.6–44.5) −15.6(−32.8–−1.9) * 2.95(−5.6–39.7) −12.7(−26.2–1.95) −46.8(−85.4–−16.0) * −5.2(−12.8–6.3)
2018–22 −46.8(−85.4–−16.0) *
Hib Meningitis
All ages 2011–18 1.75(−8.5–33.7) −29.9(−62.1–−7.3) * 1.75(−8.4–32.1) −25.4 (−44.9–0.3) −70.7(−99.1–−24.4) * −12.9(−25.8–3.3)
2018–22 −70.7(−99.1–−24.4) *
under 5 yr 2011–14 24.2(−9.2–125.9) −12.1 (−45.5–−3.2) * 24.2(−9.2–72.6) −24.2(−43.5–−11) * −24.2 (−91.2–−16.6) * −8.8(−21.9–2.2)
2014–22 −24.2(−91.2–−16.6) *
over 5 yr 2011–18 11.3(−1.6–62.6) −22.55(−52.8–4.2) 11.3(−1.65–57.7) −17.7(−37.5–13.7) −66.8(−98.0–−15.7) * −4.3(−17.4–16.9)
2018–22 −66.7(−98.02–−15.7) *
Meningitis ( confirmed and probable cases )
All ages 2011–19 −1.5(−14.8–39.8) −7.95(−15.5–0.6) −1.5(−13.7–24.4) −1.47(−13.4–4.2) −29.88(−54.8–0.6) −1.47(−7.87–4.9)
2019–22 −29.88(−54.9–0.6)
under 5 yr 2011–22 −4.7(−9.8–0.24) −4.7(−9.8–0.24) −4.7(−9.8–0.24) −4.7(−9.8–0.24) −4.7(−9.8–0.24) −4.7(−9.8 −0.24)
over 5 yr 2011–19 0.18(−14.5–60.0) −8.7(−18.7–2.9) 0.19(−13.9–34.7) 0.19(−14.8–7. 6) −37.05(−65.4–1.6) 0.19(−7.8–8.5)
2019–22 −37.05(−65.4–1.6)
Fever and Neurological Symptoms Syndrome
All ages 2011–22 −4.9(−9.9–0.004) −4.9(−9.9–0.004) −4.9(−9.9–0.004) −4.9(−9.9–0.004) −4.9(−9.9–0.004) −4.9(−9.9–0.004)
under 5 yr 2011–22 −6.4(−9.8–−3.33) * −6.4(−9.8–−3.33) * −6.4(−9.8–−3.33) * −6.4(−9.8–−3.33) * −6.4(−9.8–−3.33) * −6.4(−9.8–−3.33) *
over 5 yr 2011–22 −2.3(−8.5–4.1) −2.3(−8.5–4.1) −2.3(−8.5–4.1) −2.3(−8.5–4.1) −2.3(−8.5–4.1) −2.3(−8.5–4.1)
*

P-value<0.05

Fig. 3:

Fig. 3:

The trend of the cumulative incidence kinds of Meningitis in Iran, by age groups during the years 2011–2022

a) Bacterial Meningitis b) Viral Meningitis c) Hib. Meningitis d) Meningitis e) Fever and Neurological Symptoms Syndrome

After calculating the cumulative incidence of meningitis by provinces in the investigated period, the provinces of North Khorasan, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Qazvin, Mazandaran, Qom, and Kurdistan had the highest cumulative incidence of meningitis in Iran, respectively. The highest incidence was reported in the provinces of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, North Khorasan, Qazvin, Kurdistan, Mazandaran, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad for the age group under 5 yr, and in the provinces of Qom, Zanjan, Mazandaran, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Ilam, North Khorasan, Qazvin and Khuzestan for the age group over 5 yr (Fig. 4 a–c).

Fig. 4:

Fig. 4:

Distribution of the cumulative incidence of meningitis per 100,000 in Iran, 2011–2022 a) all ages b) under 5 yr c) over 5 yr

Discussion

We analyzed 11 yr from a national meningitis surveillance database. Due to limitations in laboratory diagnosis, we reported the incidence of the disease in both confirmed and probable cases as meningitis. We also reported the cumulative incidence of cases with fever and neurological symptoms syndrome, bacterial, viral, and Hib meningitis. AAPCs were calculated for five predetermined fixed intervals.

From 2011 to 2014, the trend in the cumulative incidence of different kinds of meningitis was not statistically significant. The cumulative incidence of bacterial meningitis decreased significantly in all ages and both age groups and the incidence of viral meningitis decreased significantly in all ages and the population under 5 yr in the years 2015–2019 and 2011–2019. The cumulative incidence of Hib meningitis decreased significantly in the population under 5 yr from 2015–2019. The incidence of viral, bacterial, and Hib meningitis decreased significantly in all ages and both age groups in the years 2020–2022.

The incidence of meningitis from all forms decreased in all ages and populations under 5 yr but increased in populations over 5 yr in the years 2011–2019 and 2015–2019, though these changes were not statistically significant. The incidence of the syndrome decreased significantly in all periods for the population under 5 yr old.

The incidence of fever and neurological symptoms syndrome was reported as 9.18, 9.75, 10.95, 10.56, 10.38, 9.09, 8.02, 9.93, 8.82, 3.3, and 5.74 per 100,000 population from 2011 to 2022, respectively. The results of this study were in agreement with a study conducted in Iran during the years 2010–2015 (15), and another study conducted to investigate the impact of the vaccination program in Iran (16). The incidence of meningitis was reported as 2.24, 2.40, 2.78, 2.58, 1.98, 2.29, 1.98, 2.50, 2.36, 0.87, and 1.3 per 100,000 population from 2011 to 2022, respectively. In North West of Morocco, Kenitra Province reported the cumulative incidence of meningitis in all forms as 4.72, 4.47, 3.21, 3.98, and 6.25 from 2014 to 2018, respectively (4). The difference in the incidence of the disease is due to the difference in the geographical conditions of the countries, different age groups, and the performance of the surveillance system, especially the adequacy of the laboratory facilities to diagnose cases.

In this study, similar to other studies conducted in different parts of the world, the trend of the incidence of bacterial meningitis was decreasing (17–22). This phenomenon can be attributed to reasons such as increased monitoring of the surveillance system, early diagnosis, progress in the treatment process, improvement of living standards, health education, ease of access to health care services, and preventive measures such as widespread prescribing of meningitis vaccination or underreporting and poor monitoring related to the meningitis surveillance program.

In Iran, the incidence of meningitis had increased from 9.77 in 2009 to 10.33 in 2014 (15). In our study, incidence cases of viral and Hib meningitis were increasing in all ages until 2018. At ages less than 5 yr, this increasing trend in Hib meningitis was observed until 2014. At ages over 5 yr, this trend was observed in viral, bacterial, and Hib meningitis until 2018 and in meningitis of all forms until 2019. This increasing trend was not statistically significant in any of the examined cases. The reasons for this increasing trend were the changes in the way of reporting and direct recording of the information on fever and neurological symptoms syndrome in the Communicable Disease Control portal by universities of medical sciences across the country. This may partially justify the increase in disease reporting (15).

Results of our study also showed that the incidence of all kinds of meningitis decreased after the COVID-19 pandemic. During the pandemic, due to the high transition of the disease and the allocation of most of the health and treatment forces to control this disease, there would be underreporting in the care and control of other infectious diseases. This phenomenon also can be attributed to interventions such as increasing hand hygiene, using masks, isolation, quarantine, and restrictions on travel.

In our study, death was observed in 3.1% of meningitis cases and 1.8% of all reported cases. In Iran, the outcome of death was observed in 2% of patients (15), in another study, the outcome of death was reported at times before and after the implementation of vaccination, which was 2.7% and 2.1%, respectively (16). In Southern Vietnam, the outcome of death was reported in 1.2% of probable cases and 8.2% of confirmed cases (17). Non-specific symptoms and various causes make it challenging to diagnose meningitis. In this study, the most common clinical symptoms were consistent with previous studies conducted in Iran (16) and North West of Morocco (4). However, the results were in contrast to another study in South Africa (2). This difference can be due to the difference in the age groups of patients and the Study population.

The study found the provinces with the highest incidence of meningitis in all ages were North Khorasan, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad, Qazvin, Mazandaran, Qom, and Kurdistan. In Iran, the most reported cases of meningitis were from the provinces of Qazvin, Mazandaran, and Kurdistan (23). In another study, the highest incidence was observed in the provinces of Qazvin, Qom, Kurdistan, and North Khorasan (15). The differences in incidence across provinces may be due to variations in the sensitivity and performance of the healthcare reporting systems. In addition, the number of reported cases in some provinces indicates a severe weakness of the reporting system and it is necessary to strengthen the syndromic surveillance system and increase the awareness of health professionals in identifying and reporting cases.

Limitations of the study include the high rate of cases with unknown pathogens and other things and defects in the reporting of pathogenic agents, serotype distribution, and the outcome of the disease due to the use of secondary data sources. The strengths of this study include the use of a long-term period of data on cases of the syndrome in all parts of Iran. Moreover, our study showed AAPCs and APCs with 95% confidence intervals and reported important changes in trend using the joinpoint regression.

Conclusion

Similar to the studies conducted in other countries, the incidence of bacterial and viral meningitis decreased in Iran during the study period. The decrease in the incidence of Hib meningitis after the implementation of the vaccination program in children under 5 yr emphasizes the importance of continuing Hib vaccination and integrating pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccinations into the national vaccination program. In addition, considering the identification of high-risk areas in the country and the weakness in the reporting system of some provinces, measures such as continuous training of health professionals in early diagnosis, increasing and strengthening the capacity of laboratories to diagnose cases, and establishing effective epidemiological surveillance is necessary to maintain the decreasing trend of incidence.

Journalism Ethics considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all contributors of the Iranian National Surveillance System, the Center for Communicable Diseases Control of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education, and the healthcare personnel of the Universities of Medical Sciences, which provided the necessary data as well as Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, who supported this study.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

References

  • 1.Zbrzeźniak J, Paradowska-Stankiewicz I. (2019). Meningitis and encephalitis in Poland in 2017. Przegl Epidemiol, 73(4):417–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Terwin K, Ferreira M, Minnie C, et al. (2022). The epidemiological profile of meningitis among adults in a South African district hospital. Pan Afr Med J, 41: 256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Karami M, Ghalandari M, Poorolajal J, et al. (2017). Early detection of meningitis outbreaks: Application of limited-baseline data. Iran J Public Health, 46 (10):1366–1373. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Loutfi A, Jayche S, Mohammed L, et al. (2020). Epidemiological, Cytochemical and Bacteriological Profile of Meningitis among Adults and Children in North West of Morocco. Pak J Biol Sci, 23 (7):891–897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ocampo FF, Espiritu AI, Jamora RDG. (2022). Current status and challenges in the care of patients with bacterial meningitis in the Philippines: A scoping review. Trop Med Int Health, 27 (1):38–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Boni-Cisse C, Jarju S, Bancroft RE, et al. (2019). Etiology of bacterial meningitis among children< 5 years old in Côte d’Ivoire: findings of hospital-based surveillance before and after pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction. Clin Infect Dis, 69(Suppl 2):S114–S120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hasbun R. (2022). Progress and Challenges in Bacterial Meningitis: A Review. JAMA, 328 (21):2147–2154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Berangi Z, Karami M, Mohammadi Y, et al. (2019). Epidemiological profile of meningitis in Iran before pentavalent vaccine introduction. BMC Pediatr, 19:370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schiess N, Groce NE, Dua T. (2021). The impact and burden of neurological sequelae following bacterial meningitis: A narrative review. Microorganisms, 9 (5):900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gahlot T, Kasana D. (2021). A cross-sectional study of etiological and sensitivity profiling of meningitis in under-five children. Int J Mycobacteriol, 10 (2):149–154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saraiva MdGG, Santos ECS, Saraceni V, et al. (2015). Epidemiology of infectious meningitis in the State of Amazonas, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop, 48 Suppl 1:79–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Houri H, Pormohammad A, Riahi SM, et al. (2017). Acute bacterial meningitis in Iran: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, 12 (2): e0169617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Meiring S, Cohen C, de Gouveia L, et al. (2022). Case-fatality and sequelae following acute bacterial meningitis in South Africa, 2016 through 2020. Int J Infect Dis, 122:1056–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang Y, Huang X, Yue S, et al. (2022). Secular Trends in the Incidence of Migraine in China from 1990 to 2019: A Joinpoint and Age–Period–Cohort Analysis. J Pain Res, 15:137–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moradi G, Zahraei SM, Khazaei Z, et al. (2021). Epidemiology incidence and geographical distribution of Meningitis using GIS and its incidence prediction in Iran in 2021. Med J Islam Repub Iran, 35:110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Heidari S, Karami M, Zahraei SM, et al. (2021). Epidemiological profile of meningitis following pentavalent vaccination in Iran: impact of vaccine introduction. J Epidemiol Glob Health, 11 (3):310–315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Truong HC, Van Phan T, Nguyen HT, et al. (2023). Childhood Bacterial Meningitis Surveillance in Southern Vietnam: Trends and Vaccination Implications from 2012 to 2021. Open Forum Infect Dis, 10(7):ofad229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Polkowska A, Toropainen M, Ollgren J, et al. (2017). Bacterial meningitis in Finland, 1995–2014: a population-based observational study. BMJ Open, 7 (5):e015080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wong CH, Duque JR, Wong JSC, et al. (2021). Epidemiology and trends of infective meningitis in neonates and infants less than 3 months old in Hong Kong. Int J Infect Dis, 111:288–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chicuto LAD, de Moraes C, Cássio de Moraes J, et al. (2020). A critical analysis of serogroup B meningococcal disease burden in Brazil (2001–2015): Implications for public health decisions. Hum Vaccin Immunother, 16 (8):1945–1950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pérez AE, Dickinson FO, Rodríguez M. (2010). Community acquired bacterial meningitis in Cuba: a follow up of a decade. BMC Infect Dis, 10:130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Parellada CI, Abreu AdJLd, Birck MG, et al. (2023). Trends in Pneumococcal and Bacterial Meningitis in Brazil from 2007 to 2019. Vaccines (Basel), 11 (8):1279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jesri N, Rezaei F, Saghafipour A, et al. (2016). Spatial analysis of bacterial meningitis in Iran using geographical information system. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, 25 (132):309–314. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES