Skip to main content
PMC home page
CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal logoLink to CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal
. 1996 Nov 1;155(9):1277–1282.

CMAJ endorses the CONSORT statement. CONsolidation of Standards for Reporting Trials.

P Huston 1, J Hoey 1
PMCID: PMC1335069  PMID: 8911294

Full text

PDF

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bailar J. C., 3rd, Mosteller F. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Amplifications and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Feb;108(2):266–273. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-2-266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailar J. C., 3rd, Mosteller F. Guidelines for statistical reporting in articles for medical journals. Amplifications and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 1988 Feb;108(2):266–273. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-108-2-266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Begg C., Cho M., Eastwood S., Horton R., Moher D., Olkin I., Pitkin R., Rennie D., Schulz K. F., Simel D. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637–639. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.8.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Begg C., Cho M., Eastwood S., Horton R., Moher D., Olkin I., Pitkin R., Rennie D., Schulz K. F., Simel D. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996 Aug 28;276(8):637–639. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.8.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dickersin K., Scherer R., Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286–1291. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dickersin K., Scherer R., Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286–1291. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Donner A., Brown K. S., Brasher P. A methodological review of non-therapeutic intervention trials employing cluster randomization, 1979-1989. Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Dec;19(4):795–800. doi: 10.1093/ije/19.4.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Donner A., Brown K. S., Brasher P. A methodological review of non-therapeutic intervention trials employing cluster randomization, 1979-1989. Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Dec;19(4):795–800. doi: 10.1093/ije/19.4.795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Evans M., Pollock A. V. Trials on trial. A review of trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. Arch Surg. 1984 Jan;119(1):109–113. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390130091016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Evans M., Pollock A. V. Trials on trial. A review of trials of antibiotic prophylaxis. Arch Surg. 1984 Jan;119(1):109–113. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1984.01390130091016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gardner M. J., Altman D. G. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 15;292(6522):746–750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gardner M. J., Altman D. G. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Mar 15;292(6522):746–750. doi: 10.1136/bmj.292.6522.746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gardner M. J., Bond J. An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1355–1357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardner M. J., Bond J. An exploratory study of statistical assessment of papers published in the British Medical Journal. JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1355–1357. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Godfrey K. Statistics in practice. Comparing the means of several groups. N Engl J Med. 1985 Dec 5;313(23):1450–1456. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198512053132305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Godfrey K. Statistics in practice. Comparing the means of several groups. N Engl J Med. 1985 Dec 5;313(23):1450–1456. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198512053132305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Karlowski T. R., Chalmers T. C., Frenkel L. D., Kapikian A. Z., Lewis T. L., Lynch J. M. Ascorbic acid for the common cold. A prophylactic and therapeutic trial. JAMA. 1975 Mar 10;231(10):1038–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Karlowski T. R., Chalmers T. C., Frenkel L. D., Kapikian A. Z., Lewis T. L., Lynch J. M. Ascorbic acid for the common cold. A prophylactic and therapeutic trial. JAMA. 1975 Mar 10;231(10):1038–1042. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee Y. J., Ellenberg J. H., Hirtz D. G., Nelson K. B. Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received: is it really an option? Stat Med. 1991 Oct;10(10):1595–1605. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee Y. J., Ellenberg J. H., Hirtz D. G., Nelson K. B. Analysis of clinical trials by treatment actually received: is it really an option? Stat Med. 1991 Oct;10(10):1595–1605. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780101011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Moher D., Dulberg C. S., Wells G. A. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):122–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Moher D., Dulberg C. S., Wells G. A. Statistical power, sample size, and their reporting in randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):122–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H. A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jan 1;116(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Oxman A. D., Guyatt G. H. A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses. Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jan 1;116(1):78–84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-116-1-78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Pocock S. J. When to stop a clinical trial. BMJ. 1992 Jul 25;305(6847):235–240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6847.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Pocock S. J. When to stop a clinical trial. BMJ. 1992 Jul 25;305(6847):235–240. doi: 10.1136/bmj.305.6847.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Grimes D. A., Altman D. G. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):125–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Grimes D. A., Altman D. G. Assessing the quality of randomization from reports of controlled trials published in obstetrics and gynecology journals. JAMA. 1994 Jul 13;272(2):125–128. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Hayes R. J., Altman D. G. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408–412. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Hayes R. J., Altman D. G. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408–412. doi: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Schulz K. F., Grimes D. A., Altman D. G., Hayes R. J. Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology. BMJ. 1996 Mar 23;312(7033):742–744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7033.742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Schulz K. F., Grimes D. A., Altman D. G., Hayes R. J. Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology. BMJ. 1996 Mar 23;312(7033):742–744. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7033.742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Schulz K. F. Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995 Nov 8;274(18):1456–1458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schulz K. F. Subverting randomization in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995 Nov 8;274(18):1456–1458. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Taddio A., Pain T., Fassos F. F., Boon H., Ilersich A. L., Einarson T. R. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. CMAJ. 1994 May 15;150(10):1611–1615. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Taddio A., Pain T., Fassos F. F., Boon H., Ilersich A. L., Einarson T. R. Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. CMAJ. 1994 May 15;150(10):1611–1615. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

RESOURCES