Skip to main content
Biodiversity Data Journal logoLink to Biodiversity Data Journal
. 2026 Jul 2;14:e194005. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.14.e194005

Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus sp. nov. (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae), a new species from south-western China

Sujian Pei 1, Huiqin Ma 1,2,✉, Bing Li 1, Zhida Chen 1, Kexin Zhang 1, Jiaqi Wang 1, Zhengyuan Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC13352247  PMID: 42434789

Abstract

Background

Ezembius was originally proposed as a subgenus of Lithobius Leach, 1814 in the family Lithobiidae in 1919 by Chamberlin; it accommodates a group of approximately 79 species/subspecies mostly known from Asia, with little extension into north-western North America.

New information

A new species Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus sp. nov. is described, based on both sexes from Daweishan National Nature Reserve, Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan, south-western China. A detailed morphological description and illustrations of the new species are provided.

Keywords: Chilopoda , new species, taxonomy, Yunnan

Introduction

Known species of Ezembius colonise a wide range of habitats, from the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions to tropical and sub-tropical forests, from steppe and overgrazed stony areas of central Asia to Himalayan montane forests, from the seashore up to 5500 m (Himalayas) (Bonato et al. 2016, Qiao et al. 2018). Although the subgenus was formally proposed as new and described in 1923 (Chamberlin 1923), according to Jeekel (Jeekel 2005), its name was validated in 1919 (Chamberlin 1919). Ezembius is characterised by antennae with ca. 20 articles; ocelli 1+4–1+20; forcipular coxosternal teeth usually 2+2; porodonts generally setiform, sometimes stout. Tergites are generally without posterior triangular projections. Female gonopods are with uni-, bi- or tridentate claws and 2+2–3+3 (rarely 4+4) spurs (Zapparoli and Edgecombe 2011).

The myriapod fauna of China is still poorly known and this is especially the case with centipedes of the order Lithobiomorpha. In total, 114 species/subspecies of lithobiomorphs to date known from China. Altogether, 33 species of Ezembius have been recorded from China (Ma et al. 2014, Pei et al. 2014, Ma et al. 2015, Qiao et al. 2018, Qiao et al. 2019a, Qiao et al. 2019b, Chao et al. 2020a, Chao et al. 2020b, Zhang et al. 2026). South-western China represents one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots (Myers et al. 2000). However, taxonomy of Lithobiomorpha in this region are notably scarce, with only a single species hitherto documented in Yunnan Province (Chao et al. 2024). The present study represents a part of our investigation into Ezembius diversity in China; herein, a new species recently discovered in Daweishan National Nature Reserve, Honghe Hani and Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan, south-western China, is described and illustrated. Tables of the main morphological characters of Chinese Ezembius species are also presented.

Materials and methods

All specimens was collected from leaf litter or under stones using entomological tweezers and preserved in 75% or 100% ethanol, respectively, for the purpose of meeting morphological and molecular biological research requirements. All specimens were examined using a ZEISS SteREO Discovery V20 microscope, equipped with an Abbe drawing tube and an ocular micrometer and Axiocam 512 colour. Plates and photographs were edited and retouched using Adobe Photoshop CS2. The external anatomical terminology follows the proposed terminology used in Bonato et al. (Bonato et al. 2010). The colour description was based on specimens preserved in 75% ethanol. Body length measured from the anterior margin of the cephalic plate to the posterior end of the postpedal tergite. Specimens have been deposited in Institute of Myriapodology, School of Life Sciences, Hengshui University, Hengshui, P. R. China (HUSLSIM).

Abbreviations are as follows: a: anterior; C: coxa; F: femur; m: median; p: posterior; P: prefemur; S, SS: sternite, sternites; T, TT: tergite, tergites; Tr: trochanter; Ti: tibia.

Taxon treatments

Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus

Pei, Ma & Li sp. nov.

29B88CA5-EEF1-5A24-8A31-5AF42EEB0B77

D15B47A3-1EDA-4723-9FE3-7C293F46EEEE

Materials

  1. Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: recordedBy: Ma Huiqin; individualCount: 1; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; occurrenceID: E2DE4597-B582-5E71-A648-218F523BE6DA; Taxon: scientificName: Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus sp. nov.; class: Chilopoda; order: Lithobiomorpha; family: Lithobiidae; genus: Lithobius; subgenus: Ezembius; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Yunnan; locality: Daweishan National Nature Reserve; verbatimElevation: 1080 m; verbatimCoordinates: N22°45′59.00″ E103°04′57.00″; Identification: identifiedBy: Ma Huiqin; dateIdentified: 2025; Event: eventDate: 24/01/2019; Record Level: collectionCode: Myriapoda; basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen

  2. Type status: Paratype. Occurrence: recordedBy: Ma Huiqin; individualCount: 3; sex: male; lifeStage: adult; occurrenceID: C99ABEE9-5952-563C-87D1-1A7804D79F4B; Taxon: scientificName: Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus sp. nov.; class: Chilopoda; order: Lithobiomorpha; family: Lithobiidae; genus: Lithobius; subgenus: Ezembius; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Yunnan; locality: Daweishan National Nature Reserve; verbatimElevation: 1080 m; verbatimCoordinates: N22°45′59.00″ E103°04′57.00″; Identification: identifiedBy: Ma Huiqin; dateIdentified: 2025; Event: eventDate: 24/01/2019; Record Level: collectionCode: Myriapoda; basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen

  3. Type status: Paratype. Occurrence: recordedBy: Ma Huiqin; individualCount: 7; sex: female; lifeStage: adult; occurrenceID: 75D4E9F1-6B88-5786-A3BA-EB71ADDE2A5B; Taxon: class: Chilopoda; order: Lithobiomorpha; family: Lithobiidae; genus: Lithobius; subgenus: Ezembius; Location: country: China; stateProvince: Yunnan; locality: Daweishan National Nature Reserve; verbatimElevation: 1080 m; verbatimCoordinates: N22°45′59.00″ E103°04′57.00″; Identification: identifiedBy: Ma Huiqin; dateIdentified: 2025; Event: eventDate: 24/01/2019; Record Level: collectionCode: Myriapoda; basisOfRecord: Preserved Specimen

Description

Body: Measurements. Male holotype body 12.39 mm long, cephalic plate 1.56 mm long, 1.50 mm wide. Body length 12.39–15.06 mm. cephalic plate length 1.33–1.61 mm, width 1.10–1.56 mm (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus sp. nov., male holotype, habitus, dorsal view.

Colour: The antennae mostly brown, darkest at the basal segments, lightest at the terminal segments, appearing pale yellow, with pale grey at the junctions between segments. Tergites dark brown, with the middle ones (TT 7, 8) being the lightest, approaching pale yellow. Pleural region light grey to dark grey. The sternites light yellowish–brown. The head shield, coxosternite and forcipular tarsungulum dark yellowish-brown, while the rest of the forcipular tarsungulum fulvous to testaceous, coxosternite, S 15 and ventral plate of the pregenital segment yellowish–brown. The coxae and tarsi of all legs yellowish–brown, occasionally with pale grey at the base, with the ta2 darker and the middle segments are pale grey.

Antennae: Mostly 18–22 articles (few 24), holotype male 20+20 articles. The first basal article significantly longer than wide, the length of the subsequent articles gradually decreasing, with the final article significantly longer than wide, 3.1–3.4 times longer than wide (Fig. 1); abundant setae on the antennal surface, fewer on the basal articles, gradual increasing in density to approximately the sixth or seventh article, then more or less constant.

Cephalic plate: Smooth, convex, slightly longer than broad, tiny setae scattered sparsely over the whole surface, the margins of the cephalic plate with very sparsely distributed, nearly uniformly long setae and the whole surface of cephalic plate is covered with a fine hexagonal mesh. Anterior margin of the cephalic plate slightly concave central, with a distinct transverse groove, the lateral margin of the cephalic capsule only beginning with a ridge from the side to the mid-point between the ocelli and the posterior margin, with a slightly convex posterior margin and a complete ridge (Fig. 2 A).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus sp. nov., A cephalic plate, dorsal view; B (female)–C (holotype) forcipular coxosternite, ventral view; D ocelli and Tömösváry’s organ (To); E (female)–F (holotype) forcipular coxosternite, ventral view.

Ocelli: 7–9 ocelli, usually 8, arranged in three irregular rows, oval to rounded ocelli on each side, the posterior ocellus larger, the ventral ocelli are smaller than the dorsal ocelli in size. Ocelli mostly translucent, with black pigmentation at the base and hemispherical in shape (Fig. 2D).

Tömösváry’s organ: Close to the ocelli, situated at the anterolateral margin of the cephalic plate, on the ventral side of the anterior part of the eye area, slightly yellow in the perimeter. The Tömösváry’s organ small, nearly round, the surrounding sclerotised area narrow and slightly larger than the adjoining ocelli (Fig. 2D).

Coxosternite: Subsemicircular in female (Fig. 2B), the lateral and anterior margins grade imperceptibly into one another, median diastema moderately shallow, V-shaped; subtrapezoidal in male (Fig. 2C), lateral margins moderately shorter than the medial margins. Anterior margin narrow, median diastema moderately deep, U-shaped. Whole surface of coxosternite covered with fine hexagonal mesh. Anterior margin bearing 2+2 blunt triangular teeth, porodonts slightly thicker, almost transparent, lying posterolateral to and separated from the lateral-most tooth, with slightly basal bulge (Fig. 2E and F). The surface of the coxosternite bears prominent striae arranged in bilateral symmetry. Near the anterior margin of the coxosternite, two to three striae run substantially straight. In the transitional zone extending from the mid-region to the vicinity of the posterior margin, the angle between the striae and the mid-line progressively decreases, while the overall pattern exhibits a radial convergence curving inwards from the lateral regions toward the mid-line (Fig. 2B and C). Scattered long setae on the ventral side of coxosternite, longer setae near the dental margin.

Tergites: Smooth, slightly convex; short to long tiny setae scattered sparsely over the entire surface, near the margin with more long setae; T1 narrower than the cephalic plate and T3, cephalic plate wider than T3. T1 narrower postero-laterally than antero-laterally, generally inverted trapezoidal. The lateral marginal ridges of all tergites continuous, posterior marginal ridge of TT1 and 3 continuous, posterior marginal ridge of TT5, 8, 10, 12 and 14 discontinuous. The posterior margin of TT1 and 3 straight, posterior margin of TT5, 7, 8 slightly concave, posterior margin of TT7, 8, 10, 12 and 14 concave. The posterior angles of all tergites without triangular projections.

Sternites: Posterior margin of sternites narrower than anterior, generally inverted trapezoidal, smooth; long setae on the surface and lateral margin, very few short setae scattered sparsely amongst them, with 1–3 longer setae at the anterior corners and 2–13 longer setae located in the centre of the anterior part, arranged approximately in two rows.

Legs: Relatively robust, tarsi well-defined on legs 1–15. All legs with moderately long curved claws. Legs 1–15 each carry an anterior accessory spur and a posterior accessory spur: the anterior spur moderately longer and slender, forming a moderately small angle with the claw; the posterior spur slightly longer and more robust, forming a comparatively large angle with the claw. Short to long setae very sparsely scattered over the surface of the coxa, trochanter, prefemur, femur and tibia of all legs. The setae are shorter and sparser from the coxa to the profemur, becoming progressively longer and denser from the femur distally to the tarsus, with the longest setae occurring on the tarsus. Furthermore, the setae on the anterior and posterior surfaces are shorter than those on the dorsal and ventral surfaces. Legs 14 and 15 obvious longer and thicker than the anterior legs, without secondary sexual characters in both female and male; tarsus 2, 8.48–9.05 times longer than wide, tarsus 2, 63.1%–67.3% length of tarsus 1 on leg 15 in female; tarsus 2 5.15–5.72 times longer than wide, tarsus 2, 63.1%–67.3% length of tarsus 1 on leg 15 in male. Leg plectrotaxy given in Table 1 and Table 2.

Table 1.

Leg plectrotaxy of Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus sp. nov., males.

Legs Ventral Dorsal
C Tr P F Ti C Tr P F Ti
1 p m p ap a
2 p amp m p ap a
3 p amp m p ap a
4 p amp m p ap ap
5-6 mp amp am p ap ap
7-10 mp amp am ap ap ap
11 mp amp am amp ap ap
12 amp amp am amp ap ap
13 m amp amp am amp ap ap
14 m amp am am amp ap ap
15 m amp am a amp ap
Table 2.

Leg plectrotaxy of Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus sp. nov., females.

Legs Ventral Dorsal
C Tr P F Ti C Tr P F Ti
1 m a a
2 p (a)m m (a)p a a
3 p (a)m (a)m p a(p) a(p)
4-5 p (a)m m p ap a
6-7 mp (a)m (a)m ap ap a(p)
8-10 mp am m ap ap ap
11 mp amp am amp ap ap
12 mp amp am ap ap ap
13 m mp (a)mp am amp p
14 m amp am am amp p
15 m amp am amp a

N.B. Letters in brackets indicate variable spines.

Coxal pores: 3–5 in number, subcircular, markedly unequal in size. Female pattern predominantly 45,5,5; male pattern 4,4,4,3. The coxal pore field hardly sunken, forming a shallow groove with elevated margins that bear sparsely distributed setae of varying lengths.

Female: S15 anterior margin broader than posterior, generally nearly semi-circular, posterior angles rounded, postero-medially straight. Moderately long to short setae relatively sparsely scattered on S15 surface. Broader than length, surface of the lateral sternal margin of pregenital segment well chitinised, posterior margin of pregenital sternite deeply concave between condyles of gonopods, except for a small, median lingulate-shaped bulge. Setae moderately densely scattered over ventral surface of the pregenital segment, slightly more setae on posterior part, especially along the posterior edge. Gonopods: first article fairly broad, bearing 25–35 moderately long setae, arranged in approximately four irregular longitudinal rows, with 2+2 small blunt coniform gonopodal spurs; second article with 5–9 long setae in the ventral, arranged in approximately three irregular rows and 1–3 setae dorsally in a longitudinal row. Third article with 2–4 longer setae on the ventral surface, arranged in two rows, with a simple apical claw (Fig. 3A, B and C).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus sp. nov. A postpedal segments and female gonopods, ventral view; B female gonopods, lateral view; C apical claw of female gonopods, magnified ventral view; D (holotype) posterior segments and male gonopods, ventral view.

Male: S15 posterior margin narrower than anterior, postero-medially slightly concave, generally an inverted trapezoid, sparsely covered with short to long setae, the setae on the edges being longer; the pregenital sternite segment evidently smaller than the female, usually well sclerotised, ventral side obviously convex; posterior margin shallow concave between the gonopods, without medial bulge. Short to long setae equally scattered on the ventral surface of the pregenital segment. Gonopods short and small, papilliform, with four long setae, apically, slightly sclerotised (Fig. 3D).

Diagnosis

In accordance with the grouping of species proposed in the subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin, 1919, the new species differs from other consubgeners in combination of characters, by having the surface of the coxosternite bearing prominent striae arranged in bilateral symmetry, the coxosternite of males and females differing markedly in morphology, the antennae 18–22 articles, ocelli 7–9 on each side, arranged in three rows, with the last one ocellus being the largest, Tömösváry’s organ slightly larger than the adjacent ocelli; commonly 2+2 coxosternal teeth; coxal pore formula 3–5. Female gonopods with 2+2 spurs, apical claw of the third article simple, male gonopods short and small, papilliform, with four long setae.

Etymology

The specific epithet, meaning the distinct transverse striae on the ventral side of the coxosternite.

Taxon discussion

Morphologically, the new species is close to L. (E.) datongensis Qiao, Qin, Ma, Zhang, Su & Lin, 2018 from Datong County, Qinghai Province, in having Tömösváry’s organ larger than the adjoining ocelli, commonly 2+2 coxosternal teeth, female gonopods with 2+2 spurs, apical claw of the third article simple. It can be readily distinguished by: ocelli 7–9 on each side versus 10 on each side in L. (E.) datongensis; leg 15 bearing both anterior and posterior accessory spurs versus only a posterior spur in L. (E.) datongensis; the apical claw of the female gonopods simple versus bears a distinct basal triangular protuberance in L. (E.) datongensis; coxae of legs 13–15 without anterior spines versus with anterior spines in L. (E.) datongensis.

The new species and L. (E.) hualongensis Qiao, Qin, Ma, Lin & Zhang, 2019 from Hualong Hui Autonomous County, Qinghai Province, share ocelli arranged in irregular three rows, Tömösváry’s organ larger than the adjoining ocelli, commonly 2+2 coxosternal teeth and apical claw of female gonopods simple. Diagnostic differences are: the posterior ocellus larger versus the posterior two ocelli larger in L. (E.) hualongensis; legs 14 and 15 each carry an anterior accessory spur and a posterior accessory spur versus leg 14 carrying a posterior accessory spur and leg 15 without accessory spur in L. (E.) hualongensis; female gonopods with 2+2 spurs versus 3+3 spurs in L. (E.) hualongensis; legs 13–15 without anterior spines on the dorsal side of the coxae with anterior spines in L. (E.) hualongensis.

The new species closely resembles L. (E.) hirsutipes Eason, 1989 from Xizang Autonomous Region, in possessing antennae 20 + 20 articles, ocelli arranged in irregular three rows, 2+2 coxosternal teeth, female gonopods bearing 2+2 spurs. It is readily distinguished by: ocelli 7–9 on each side versus ocelli 10–11 in L. (E.) hirsutipes; the coxosternite of males and females differ markedly in morphology versus substantially similar between sexes in L. (E.) hirsutipes, the second article of the female gonopods lacking dorsal robust spines versus possessing five robust spines in L. (E.) hirsutipes; and the apical claw of the third article of the female gonopods simple and with a very faint ventral tubercle in L. (E.) hirsutipes; and the absence of anterior dorsal spines on the coxae of legs 13–15 versus present in L. (E.) hirsutipes.

Notes

To facilitate the identification of Chinese subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin, 1919 species, the distribution and main morphological characters of the known species of the subgenus in the area is presented (Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). These characters are specific only to adults of the taxa occurring in China.

Table 3.

The main morphological characters of the known Chinese species of subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin, 1919.

characters anabilineatus anasulcifemoralis bidens bilineatus brachyspinipes chekianus daliensis
Authorities Ma et al., 2015 (Ma et al. 2015) Ma et al., 2013 (Ma et al. 2013) Takakuwa, 1939 (Takakuwa 1939) Pei et al., 2014 (Ma et al. 2014) Pei et al., 2020 (Pei et al. 2020) Chamberlin and Wang, 1952 (Chamberlin and Wang 1952) Chao et al., 2024 (Chao et al. 2024)
Distribution China S (Guangxi) China S (Guangxi) China S (Taiwan) China S (Guangxi) China N(Henan) China E (Zhejiang) China SW (yunnan)
Body length (mm) 11.9–12.1 10.1–12.3 15 9.0–9.1 9.6–13.3 16 18.0–22.0
Number of antennal articles 23+23 articles in female, unkown in male 19–24, commonly 20+20 20–21 two specimens with 20+21, one specimen with 20+23 21–24 20+20 20 or 21
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 5 – 6, in 3 rows 6, in 3 rows 7 5–6, in 2 rows 8–10, in 2 or 3 rows 5, in 2 rows 9 or 10, in 3 irregular rows
Posterior ocellus round, large oval to round, large comparatively large oval to rounded oval to rounded, comparatively large oval to round, comparatively large the most posterior ocellus largest
Tömösváry's organ round, smaller than adjoining ocelli moderately large, rounded, smaller than adjoining ocelli at most same size as one ocellus slightly larger than adjoining ocelli smaller than the adjacent ocelli not reported smaller than the adjoining ocelli
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 2+2, subtriangular 2+2, subtriangular 2+2 2+2, slightly triangular 2+2, subtriangular slightly acute teeth 2+2 2+2, subtriangular teeth
Number of coxal pores 3–5, male 4454, 3554; female 4443, 4453 3–6, usually 4663, 5654, 5553,5563 and 5565 5(6)555 usually females 4554, 5565; males 4553, 4454 3–6, usually 4453, 5553, 4554, 5554 6655 or 7665 5555 or 6555
Male 14 leg obvious, thicker and stronger than other legs markedly thicker and stronger than legs 1–13 not reported distinctly thick and strong significantly thicker not reported not reported
Male 15 leg obvious thicker and stronger than other legs markedly thicker and stronger than legs 1–13 not reported distinctly thick and strong significantly thicker not reported thicker and stronger
DaC spine on legs 14–15 on legs 14–15 absent on legs 14–15 on legs 13–15 on legs 14–15 on legs 14–15
14 leg accessory spur the anterior reduced in size, only half length of the posterior absent with a pair of accessory claws anterior accessory spur absent both present present present
15 leg accessory spur absent absent with visible accessory spur anterior accessory spur absent absent present present
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 2+2 moderately small, blunt, coniform, inner spur slightly smaller than the outer 2+2 moderately blunt, with conical spurs, inner spur slightly smaller 3+3 or 4+4, sharp 2+2, moderately small, blunt, coniform, inner spur slightly smaller than outer one 2+2, moderately small, blunt, coniform, inner spur slightly smaller than outer one not reported 2+2, 3+2 or 3+3; sharp coniform spurs, inner spur smaller
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) simple, small subtriangular teeth in the inner apical claw dimidiate not reported apical claw bipartite two robust spines, apical claw bipartite not reported undivided, a small sharp lateral denticle on base of terminal claw
Male gonopods short and small bulge, with one long setae with a small bulge, without setae hemispherical, with two long setae short and small bulge, having a long seta hemispherical bulge not reported short and small, with 2–4 long setae, slightly chitinized apically
Table 4.

The main morphological characters of the known Chinese species of subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin, 1919.

characters datongensis dulanensis gantoensis helanensis hirsutipes hualongensis insolitus
Authorities Qiao et al., 2018 (Qiao et al. 2018) Qiao et al., 2019 (Qiao et al. 2019b) Takakuwa and Takashima, 1949 (Takakuwa and Takashima 1949) Lu et al., 2022 (Lu et al. 2022) Eason, 1989 (Eason 1989) Qiao et al., 2019 (Qiao et al. 2019a) Eason, 1993 (Eason 1993)
Distribution China NW (Qinghai) China NW (Qinghai) China N (Shanxi) China NW (Ningxia) China NW (Xizang) China NW (Qinghai) China S (Hong Kong)
Body length (mm) 12.3–14.2 20.5 9.0 17.6–29.8 12.7–15.7 12.3–16.2 10.0-11.5
Number of antennal articles 20+20 20–21 20–23 19-28, commonly 21+21 20-20 20+20 18+18-19+19
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 10, in 3 rows 11–12, in 3 rows 6, in 2 rows 9-16, commonly 12–14; in 3, 4 or 5 rows 10-11, in 3 rows 8–11, in 3 irregular rows 6–8, in 2 rows
Posterior ocellus comparativelylarge ovate to circular, comparatively large not reported the most posterior ocellus largest comparatively large two ocelli comparatively large comparatively large
Tömösváry's organ slightly largerthan nearest ocellus slightly smaller than the adjoining ocelli subequal in size to adjoining medium large ocelli same size as adjacent ocelli same size as the largest ocellus larger than the adjoining ocelli slightly smaller than adjoining ocelli
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 2+2, slightly acute 2+2 moderately robust teeth 2+2, approximately sharp, small commonly 2+2, few 2+3, very few 3+3, 3+4, 4+5; subtriangular slightly acute teeth 2+2, small and subtriangular slightly acute teeth 2+2, small blunt teeth 2+2
Number of coxal pores female 4655, 5575 and 5544. Coxal pores 4654 and 4554 in male 5667 or 5666 3333 6-10, commonly 7 or 8 4-6, female 5555, 4555; male 5555, 4555, 4554, 4544, 4444 round or slightly oval, 6666 and 6777 in female and 4654 and 4655 in male 3–6, male 3443; female 4454, 4555, 5555, 5565
Male 14 leg significantly thicker longer and thicker than legs 1–13 not reported thick and strong thicker and stronger thicker and stronger distinctly thick and strong
Male 15 leg significantly thicker longer and thicker than legs 1–13 not reported thick and strong thicker and stronger thicker and stronger distinctly thick and strong, with dark zones on dorsal of tibia
DaC spine on legs 12–15 on legs 11–15 absent on legs 12–15 on legs 11–15 on legs 12–15 absent
14 leg accessory spur present anterior accessory spines absent present present present with only posterior spines not reported
15 leg accessory spur anterior accessory spur absent absent present only posterior accessory spur absent absent absent
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 2+2 moderately large, coniform spurs 2+2, moderately small coniform spurs 1+1, apically acute 2-3, commonly 3+3 few 2+3; small, coniform spurs, spurs, inner spur smaller 2+2, coniform spurs, the inner ones smaller and acuter, the outer ones larger and blunter 3+3, moderately long and slender spurs 3+3, coniform spurs
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) undivided, bearing a small triangular protuberance on ventral side simple, curved simple simple and broad slender and sharp, having a relatively small triangular protuberance on the dorsal side, and a weak protuberance on the ventral side simple and sharp, having a very small triangular protuberance on ventral side simple
Male gonopods hemispherical bulge, with three setae small, one-segmented, with two long setae not reported short, a small hemispherical bulge, with 0-2 long setae short, appearing as a small hemispherical bulge, with 2-4 long setae short, appearing as a small hemispherical bulge, with one long setae not reported
Table 5.

The main morphological characters of the known Chinese species of subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin, 1919.

characters irregularis keelungensis kiayiensis laevidentata lineatus longibasitarsus mandschreiensis
Authorities Takakuwa and Takashima, 1949 (Takakuwa and Takashima 1949) Chao et al., 2020 (Chao et al. 2020a) Wang, 1959 (Wang 1959) Pei et al., 2015 (Pei et al. 2015) Takakuwa, 1939 (Takakuwa 1939) Qiao et al., 2018 (Qiao et al. 2018) Takakuwa, 1939 (Takakuwa 1939)
Distribution China N (Shanxi) China S (Taiwan) China S (Taiwan) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur) China S (Taiwan) China NW (Qinghai) China (Taiwan, Sichuan, Hebei, Jiangsu, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning)
Body length (mm) 12.0 11.0–13.5 9.0–12.0 9.6–13.3 18.0 17.0–18.0 22.0–23.0
Number of antennal articles 20+20 20 26-31 19–22 commonly 20+20, only one specimen 25+20 19+19–21+21 20+20 20–28
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 7 7–9, in 3 irregular rows 6–8 8–10, in 3 rows 8–10, in 3 rows 10–14, in 3 irregular rows 9–12, in 3 rows
Posterior ocellus comparatively large posterior ocellus largest not reported posterior two ocelli bigger than seriate ocelli not reported posterior ocellus largest same size
Tömösváry's organ same size as the largest ocellus larger than adjoining ocelli not reported subequal in size to adjoining ocelli same size as adjoining ocelli smaller than adjoining ocelli larger than adjoining ocelli
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 2+2, small 2+2, large triangular, the inner are larger than the outer 3+3 2+2, most are relatively sharp, while a few are rather blunt and rounded 2+2, comparatively large 2+2 or 2+3 blunt nipple-like teeth 2+2, small and sharp
Number of coxal pores 3–10, 3–6 in 12 leg, 4–6 in 13 leg, 7–10 in 14 and 15 leg 4–6 4444 2–5, female commonly 4555, 4554, sometime 3454, 3455, 3343. male 2332, 2333, 3444, 3333 6–7, usually 6(7)666 4–6; 5544, 5554 or 6555 776(7)5(6)
Male 14 leg not reported distinctly thick not reported remarkably thicker and stronger not reported moderately thicker and longer not reported
Male 15 leg not reported distinctly thick not reported markedly thicker and stronger not reported moderately thicker and longer not reported
DaC spine on legs 13–15 absent absent on legs 12–15 on legs 14–15 on legs 13–15, 12 sometimes present on legs 12–15
leg 14 accessory spur not reported very short anterior accessory spurs not reported present present present not reported
leg 15 accessory spur not reported anterior absent not reported absent present absent not reported
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 2+2 or 2+3, the basal spurs are large, short and sharp 2+2, sharp coniform spurs, the inner are larger than the outer 2+2 3+4, or 4+4 small, blunt, coniform spurs, commonly with 3+3, inner spur smaller than outer one 3+3 moderately sharp, slender conical spurs 2+2 moderately long, bullet-shaped spurs inner spur slightly smaller and more anterior than outer one 3+3, same size
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) simple undivided, a small sharp lateral denticle on the base of the terminal claw tridentate simple, a small approximately triangular process on the ventral side of the base simple simple, having small triangular protuberance on ventral side simple
Male gonopods not reported short and small, as a semispherical bulge with 3 long setae, apically well chitinized not reported small bulge, with one to two long setae hemispherical bulge small, semicircular with 3-5 seta on its surface without setae
Table 6.

The main morphological characters of the known Chinese species of subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin, 1919.

characters maqinensis multispinipes parvicornis polyommatus potanini rapax rhysus
Authorities Qiao et al., 2019 (Qiao et al. 2019a) Pei et al., 2016 (Pei et al. 2016) Porat, 1893 (Porat 1893; Zapparoli 1991) Qiao et al., 2019 (Qiao et al. 2019b) Sseliwanoff, 1881 (Sseliwanoff 1881) Meinert, 1872 (Meinert 1872) Attems, 1934 (Attems 1934)
Distribution China NW (Qinghai) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur) China S (Taiwan) China NW (Xizang) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur) China S (Taiwan) China S (Fujian and Taiwan)
Body length (mm) 13.1–14.6 famale 11.6–22.6, male 14.3–19.6 16.0 16.1–18.3 13.0–15.0 not reported 15.0
Number of antennal articles 20+20 commonly 20+20, (three specimens with 20+21, one specimen with 20+26 of 133 specimens) 20+20, 21+21 20+20 20 or 23 19–22 20+20 in female, 21+21 in male
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 9–12, in 3 irregular rows 8, in 3 rows 3–4, in 1 or 2 rows 14, in 3 or 4 rows 8–10 7, in 2 rows 8, in 4 rows
Posterior ocellus the most posterior ocellus largest two ocelli large, oval to rounded comparatively large comparatively large not reported comparatively large comparatively large
Tömösváry's organ almost the same size as adjacent ocelli slightly smaller than adjoining ocelli not reported moderately smaller than the adjoining ocelli smaller than the adjacent ocelli not reported not reported
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 2+2 2+2 slightly triangular 2+2 2+2 subtriangular slightly acute teeth 2+2, small and sharp 2+2 2+2
Number of coxal pores 6666 3–5, 4555, 5555, 4444, 4455 (females) and 4444, 3344 (males) 3334 4–7, 5676, 5666 (females) 5565, 4554 (males) 3–4 4554 6554
Male 14 leg longer and thicker thick and strong not reported significantly thicker and stronger not reported not reported not reported
Male 15 leg longer and thicker than legs 1–13 thick and strong not reported significantly thicker and stronger not reported femur and tibia thicker prefemur and femur thicker
DaC spine on legs 12–15, 11 sometimes present on legs 11–15, 9–10 sometimes present not reported on legs 11–15 not reported on leg 15 present on leg 15 present
14 leg accessory spur posterior accessory spurs present present not reported with anterior and posterior accessory spurs not reported not reported not reported
15 leg accessory spur absent absent not reported absent not reported not reported absent
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 2+2 moderately small, coniform spurs, spurs, inner spur smaller 2+2, blunt, coniform spurs, with inner spur smaller than outer one 2+2 2+2 moderately long and slender, bullet-shape spurs 2 spurs, widely separated 2+2, thick spurs 2+2, slender
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) unidentate, curved with a small triangular protuberance on ventral side simple simple simple simple, 1 stout spurs arranged in no regular pattern dimidiate simple
Male gonopods small, undivided, oblique apically, with 2 setae hemispherical bulge, having 2 long seta not reported short, a small hemispherical bulge with 2 long setae small, with 1 long setae not reported not reported
Table 7.

The main morphological characters of the known Chinese species of subgenus Ezembius Chamberlin, 1919.

characters Sui sulcifemoralis ternidentatus varioporus Zebrinus sp.nov. zhui
Authorities Qiao et al., 2019 (Qiao et al. 2019a) Takakuwa and Takashima, 1949 (Takakuwa 1939) Pei et al., 2019 (Pei et al. 2019) Pei et al., 2020 (Pei et al. 2020) Pei et al., 2011 (Pei et al. 2011)
Distribution China NW (Qinghai) China N (Shanxi) China N (Hebei) China N (Hebei) China SW (yunnan) China NW (Xinjiang Uygur)
Body length (mm) 12.2–18.9 12.0 7.1–8.5 12.4–13.6 12.4–15.1 8.1–15.0
Number of antennal articles 20+20 20+20 22-25, commonly 24, few 22+24 or 24+25 20–22, commonly 20+20, few 20+21 or 20+22 18–22, few 24 20-24, commonly 20
Number, arrangement and shape of the ocelli 9–10, in 3 irregular rows 6 5–6, in 2 irregular rows 9–10, in 3 rows 7–9, in 3 rows 10–13, in 3–4 rows
Posterior ocellus two ocelli large all ocelli same size two ocelli comparatively large two ocelli comparatively large comparatively large comparatively large
Tömösváry's organ larger than the adjacent ocelli same size as ocelli same size as the largest two ocelli largerthan nearest ocellus slightly larger than the adjacent ocelli slightly larger than adjoining ocelli
Number and arrangement of coxosternal teeth 3+3, subtriangular bluntly rounded teeth 2+2, small and sharp commonly 3+3, but also 3+2 or 2+2 2+2, subtriangular slightly obtuse teeth 2+2, subtriangular slightly acute teeth 2+2, moderately small and pointed
Number of coxal pores 4–8, 5664, 5665, 7775, 8875 in female, and 6886, 7665 in male. 5555 33(4)4(5)3, commonly 3443 3-8, females 4554, 67(8)7(8)6, 5(6)765, 6(7)776, 66(7)65; males 66(7)7(6)5(4), 565(6)3 3-5, female 4555, male 4443 2–4, 3444, 3344, 3443, 3333 in female, and 3443, 2343, 2433, 2333 in male.
Male 14 leg thicker and stronger thick and strong moderately thicker and longer moderately thicker and stronger moderately thicker and stronger moderately thicker and stronger
Male 15 leg thicker and stronger thick and strong moderately thicker and longer moderately thicker and stronger moderately thicker and stronger moderately thicker and stronger
DaC spine on legs 12–15 absent on legs 10–15 absent absent on legs 13–15, 12 sometimes present
14 leg accessory spur only posterior accessory spur not reported small posterior accessory spurs only anterior spines present present
15 leg accessory spur only posterior accessory spur not reported small posterior accessory spurs only anterior accessory spur present absent
Number and shape of spurs on female gonopods 3+3, moderately long and slender, bullet-shape spurs 2+2, strong, long and sharp 2+2, moderately long and slender, coniform spurs 3+3, small coniform spurs, inner spur slightly smaller than outer one 2+2, bullet-shape spurs 2+2 moderately long, coniform spurs
Apical claw of female gonopods (and lateral denticles) simple and sharp, having a very small triangular protuberance on ventral side simple simple simple and broad simple,with 2–4 setae broad, and tridentate
Male gonopods short, a small hemispherical bulge, with 2 long setae with a few setae short, a small hemispherical bulge, with 1–3 long setae short, a small finger-like bulges, with 3–4 long setae small bulge, with 4 long setae small bulge, with 1–2 long setae

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant no. 31572239), the Key project at central government level: The ability establishment of sustainable use for valuable Chinese medicine resources (Grant. No. 2060302) and the project of Hengshui University (no. 2019GC19) and the Key Discipline of Zoology of Hengshui University. We are grateful to Dr Gregory D Edgecombe (London), Dr Pavel Stoev (Sofia) and Dr Marzio Zapparoli (Viterbo) for their hospitality and valuable assistance during our research.

Funding Statement

the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC grant no. 31572239), the Key project at central government level: The ability establishment of sustainable use for valuable Chinese medicine resources (Grant. No. 2060302), and the project of Hengshui University (no. 2019GC19) and the Key Discipline of Zoology of Hengshui University.

References

  1. Attems C. Einige neue Geophiliden und Lithobiiden des Hamburger Museums. Zoologischer Anzeiger. 1934;107:310–317. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bonato Lucio, Edgecombe Gregory, Lewis John, Minelli Alessandro, Pereira Luis, Shelley Rowland, Zapparoli Marzio. A common terminology for the external anatomy of centipedes (Chilopoda) ZooKeys. 2010;(69):17–51. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.69.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  3. Bonato L, Chagas Jr. A, Edgecombe G D, Lewis J G E, Minelli A, Pereira L, Alberto S M, Zapparoli M. ChiloBase 2.0 - A world catalogue of Centipedes (Chilopoda) https://chilobase.biologia.unipd.it. [2026-03-20T00:10:35+00:00]. https://chilobase.biologia.unipd.it
  4. Chamberlin R V. In: Report of the Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913–1918. Volume III: Insects. Part H: Spiders, Mites and Myriapods. Prince E. E., et al., editors. King's Printer; Ottawa: 1919. Chilopoda.15-22 [Google Scholar]
  5. Chamberlin R V. Chilopods of the Pribilof Islands. North American Fauna. 1923;(46):240–244.
  6. Chamberlin Ralph V, Wang Yushi M. Some records and descriptions of chilopods from Japan and other Oriental area. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington. 1952;65:177–186. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chao Jui-Lung, Lee Kwen-Shen, Chang Hsueh-Wen. Two new species of centipedes, Lithobius keelungensis sp. nov. and Lithobius (Monotarsobius) qingquanensis sp. nov., from Taiwan (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae) Opuscula Zoologica. 2020;(51):47–56. doi: 10.18348/opzool.2020.s2.47. [DOI]
  8. Chao Jui-Lung, Lee Kwen-Shen, Yang Zi-Zhong, Chang Hsueh-Wen. Two new species of centipedes, Tygarrup daliensis sp. nov. (Mecistocephalidae) and Australobius cangshanensis sp. nov. (Lithobiidae), from Southwestern China. Opuscula Zoologica. 2020;(51):57–67. doi: 10.18348/opzool.2020.s2.57. [DOI]
  9. Chao Jui-Lung, Lee Kwen-Shen, Chang Hsueh-Wen. Lithobius (Ezembius) daliensis sp. nov., a new species of centipede from Yunnan, China (Chilopoda, Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae) Collection and Research. 2024;(36):1–13.
  10. Eason E H. Lithobiidae from the Nepal Himalayas with descriptions of ten new species of Lithobius and Australobius (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik. 1989;116:335–372. [Google Scholar]
  11. Eason E H. Descriptions of four new species of Lithobius from the oriental region and a redescription of Australobius palnis (Eason 1973) from Sri Lanka (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona. 1993;17:181–199. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jeekel C A W. Nomenclator generum et familiarum Chilopodorum: a list of the genus and family-group names in the class Chilopoda from the 10th edition of Linnaeus, 1758, to the end of 1957. Myriapod Memoranda. 2005;Supplement(1):1–130. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lu Yanmin, Pei Sujian, Liu Haipeng, Ma Huiqin. Description of a new species of Lithobius Leach, 1814 (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) and molecular phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Hebei University(Natural Science Edition) 2022;42(1):60–67. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ma Huiqin, Pei Sujian, Wu Dayong, Gai Yonghua. A new lithobiid centipede of Lithobius (Ezembius) (Lithobiomorpha) from China. Oriental Insects. 2013;47(1):1–6. doi: 10.1080/00305316.2012.753763. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ma Huiqin, Pei Sujian, Hou Xiaojie, Zhu Tiegang, Wu Dayong, Gai Yonghua. An annotated checklist of Lithobiomorpha of China. Zootaxa. 2014;3847(3):333–358. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3847.3.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ma Huiqin, Pei Sujian, Hou Xiaojie, Zhu Tiegang, Gai Yonghua. Lithobius (Ezembius) anabilineatus sp. nov., a new species (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) from Eastern China. Oriental Insects. 2015;49(3-4):256–263. doi: 10.1080/00305316.2015.1081647. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Meinert F. Myriapoda Musaei Hauniensis. Bidrag til Myriapoderns Morphologi og Systematik. II. Lithobiini. Naturhistorisk Tidsskrift. 1872;3(8):281–344. [Google Scholar]
  18. Myers Norman, Mittermeier Russell A, Mittermeier Cristina G, Gustavo A. B. da Fonseca, Kent Jennifer. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403:853–858. doi: 10.1038/35002501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pei Sujian, Ma Huiqin, Shi Baojun, Wu Dayong, Gai Yonghua. A new centipede species of Lithobius Leach (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) from China. Oriental Insects. 2011;45(1):108–114. doi: 10.1080/00305316.2011.590642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pei Sujian, Ma Huiqin, Zhu Tiegang, Gai Yonghua. A new species of Lithobius (Ezembius) Chamberlin (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) from China. Oriental Insects. 2014;48(1-2):102–107. doi: 10.1080/00305316.2014.959787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pei Sujian, Ma Huiqin, Xiaojie Hou, Zhu Tiegang, Gai Yonghua. Lithobius (Ezembius) laevidentata sp. n., a new species (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) from the Northwest region of China. Biologia. 2015;70(8):1113–1117. doi: 10.1515/biolog-2015-0124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Pei SUJIAN, Lu YANMIN, Liu HAIPENG, Hou XIAOJIE, Ma HUIQIN, Zapparoli MARZIO. Lithobius (Ezembius) multispinipes n. sp., a new species of centipede from Northwest China (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) Zootaxa. 2016;4169(2):390–400. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4169.2.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Pei Sujian, Liu Haipeng, Lu Yanmin, Hou Xiaojie, Ma Huiqin. Lithobius (Ezembius) ternidentatus sp. n. (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae), a new species from China. ZooKeys. 2019;829:1–13. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.829.30884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pei Sujian, Lu Yanmin, Liu Haipeng, Hou Xiaojie, Ma Huiqin. Lithobius (Ezembius) Brachyspinipes sp. n., A New Species of Centipede from China (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae) Transactions of the American Entomological Society. 2020;146(2) doi: 10.3157/061.146.0205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Porat C. Myriopodes récoltés en Syrie par le Docteur Theodore Barrois. Revue Biologique du Nord de la France. 1893;6:62–79. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16021566. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Qiao Penghai, Qin Wen, Ma Huiqin, Zhang Tongzuo, Su Jianping, Lin Gonghua. Two new species of Lithobius on Qinghai-Tibetan plateau identified from morphology and COI sequences (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae) ZooKeys. 2018;785:11–28. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.785.28580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Qiao Penghai, Qin Wen, Ma Huiqin, Zhang Tongzuo. Two new species of lithobiid centipedes and the first record of Lamyctes africanus Porath (Chilopoda: Lithobiomorpha) in China. Journal of Natural History. 2019;53:897–921. doi: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1606355. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Qiao Penghai, Ma Huiqin, Pei Sujian, Zhang Tongzuo, Su Jianping. Lithobius (Ezembius) polyommatus sp. n. and Lithobius (Ezembius) dulanensis sp. n. (Lithobiomorpha: Lithobiidae), two new species from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Biologia. 2019;74(5):455–462. doi: 10.2478/s11756-018-00173-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Sseliwanoff A V. Neue Lithobiiden aus Sibirien und Centralasien. Zoologischer Anzeiger. 1881;4(73):15–17. [Google Scholar]
  30. Takakuwa Y. Über Japanische Lithobius-Arten. Transactions of the Sapporo Natural History Society. 1939;(16):28–37.
  31. Takakuwa Yosioki, Takashima Haruo. Myriapods collected in Shansi, North China. Acta Arachnologica. 1949;11:51–69. doi: 10.2476/asjaa.11.51. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang Y. M. Serica 1b. A preliminary report on the Myriapoda and Arachnida of Lan Yu Islets (Botel Tobago) China. Quarterly Journal of the Taiwan Museum. 1959;8:195–201. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zapparoli M. Note su alcune specie di chilopodi della regione palestinese. Fragmenta Entomologica. 1991;(23):15–33.
  34. Zapparoli M, Edgecombe G D. In: Treatise on Zoology – Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology – The Myriapoda, Volume 1. Minelli A, et al., editors. Brill; Leiden: 2011. Lithobiomorpha.371-389. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang Yutong, Ma Huiqin, Pei Sujian, Zhang Feng. A new species of the genus Australobius Chamberlin, 1920 (Lithobiomorpha, Lithobiidae) from southwestern China. Biodiversity Data Journal. 2026;14 doi: 10.3897/bdj.14.e182797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Lithobius (Ezembius) zebrinus

Articles from Biodiversity Data Journal are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES