Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a small, isolated hospital that has no facilities to perform cesarean section and handles fewer than 50 deliveries annually can provide acceptably safe obstetric and perinatal care. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Southern region of the Queen Charlotte Islands, BC, served by a 21-bed hospital and medical clinic in Queen Charlotte City. The hospital and clinic are staffed by five family practitioners without local obstetric, pediatric, anesthetic or surgical support. PATIENTS: All women beyond 20 weeks' gestation who gave birth from Jan. 1, 1984, to Dec. 31, 1988; 33% were primiparous and 20% native. Of the 286 women 192 (67%) delivered locally, 33 (12%) were transferred after admission because of antepartum or intrapartum complications, and 61 (21%) delivered elsewhere by choice or on their physician's recommendation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal mortality rate and adverse perinatal outcome (death, birth weight of less than 2500 g, neonatal transfer or Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 minutes). MAIN RESULTS: There were six perinatal deaths, for a perinatal mortality rate of 20.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.4 to 37.2). The hospital-based rate of adverse perinatal outcome was 6.2% (12 of 193 newborns) (95% CI 2.8% to 9.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The perinatal mortality rate is not a meaningful way to assess small populations; about 85 years of data would be required to decrease the 95% CIs from within 16 to within 4. The rate of adverse perinatal outcome in our study was consistent with the rate in other studies. Collaboration of small, rural hospitals is required to increase cohort size so that the correlation between the currently accepted standard, the perinatal mortality rate, and other outcome measures can be determined.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Black D. P., Fyfe I. M. The safety of obstetric services in small communities in northern Ontario. Can Med Assoc J. 1984 Mar 1;130(5):571–576. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Black D. P., Gick S. Management of obstetric complications at a small rural hospital. Can Med Assoc J. 1979 Jan 6;120(1):31–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Franks P., Eisinger S. Adverse perinatal outcomes: is physician specialty a risk factor? J Fam Pract. 1987 Feb;24(2):152–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- LeFevre M., Williamson H. A., Hector M., Jr Obstetric risk assessment in rural practice. J Fam Pract. 1989 Jun;28(6):691–696. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lessard P., Kinloch D. Northern obstetrics: a 5-year review of delivery among Inuit women. CMAJ. 1987 Dec 1;137(11):1017–1021. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Owen J. D. A review of the general practitioner obstetric service in Colchester 1970-1979. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1981 Feb;31(223):92–96. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rosenblatt R. A., Reinken J., Shoemack P. Is obstetrics safe in small hospitals? Evidence from New Zealand's regionalised perinatal system. Lancet. 1985 Aug 24;2(8452):429–432. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92747-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan G. M., Jr Regional planning for maternal and perinatal health services. Semin Perinatol. 1977 Jul;1(3):255–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schmidt B., Kirpalani H., Rosenbaum P., Cadman D. Strengths and limitations of the Apgar score: a critical appraisal. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(9):843–850. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90100-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tew M. Do obstetric intranatal interventions make birth safer? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Jul;93(7):659–674. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]