Skip to main content
One Health logoLink to One Health
. 2026 Jun 29;23:101503. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2026.101503

Five years of wastewater surveillance reveal COVID-19–Associated amplification and seasonal shifts in blaKPC and blaNDM

Anastasia Zafeiridou 1, Foteini Pitaouli 1, Georgia Georgakopoulou 1, Nikolaos Thomaidis 1,, Athina Markou 1,
PMCID: PMC13355205  PMID: 42436810

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has intensified in recent years, raising concerns about the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on AMR dynamics. However, the influence of pandemic on the enviromental occurrence and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs) remains under investigation. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) provides an integrated view of community-level AMR dynamics, yet long-term assessments spanning the pandemic period remain limited. This study investigated the occurrence, temporal patterns, and seasonal behavior of two clinically relevant carbapenemase genes, blaKPC and blaNDM, in raw wastewater from the Attica region over a five-year period (July 2021–September 2025). A sensitive and specific 3-plex qPCR assay was developed and analytically validated for the simultaneous quantification of blaKPC, blaNDM, and 16S rRNA, the latter serving as a stable bacterial load indicator.

Across the monitoring period, blaKPC was consistently detected, showing a steady increase and reaching its highest concentrations in 2023, while blaNDM exhibited intermittent but pronounced surges, particularly in 2023. Comparison with community SARS-CoV-2 viral loads suggest temporal association with AMR signatures in wastewater. Seasonal analysis showed non-uniform patterns, with atypical warm-season peaks of both ARGs in 2023–2024 and a return to classical autumn–winter peaks in 2025, suggesting a gradual restoration of pre-pandemic seasonality.

To our knowledge, this is among the first long-term WBE studies to characterize post-COVID-19 shifts in ARG occurrence and seasonality. The results demonstrate that the pandemic period was associated with elevated and fluctuating ARG levels in the urban wastewater system, emphasizing the need for sustained AMR monitoring. These findings address critical knowledge gaps in environmental AMR surveillance and support the integration of WBE into public health strategies aimed at mitigating AMR dissemination.

Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, Antimicrobial resistance genes, blaKPC, blaNDM, Wastewater-based epidemiology

Graphical abstract

Unlabelled Image

Highlights

  • Wastewater surveillanceenables monitoring of community-level AMR dynamics.

  • Five-year monitoring assessed seasonal patterns of two prevalent ARGs.

  • blaKPC and blaNDM increased markedly in 2023, then declined afterward.

  • SARS-CoV-2 and both ARGs showed opposite community trends.

  • ARGs peaked in warm seasons in 2023 and 2024, reversing in 2025.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is recognized as a critical global health threat, undermining healthcare systems and turning previously manageable infections into life-threatening conditions [1]. Antibiotic- resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic-resistant genes (ARGs) occur naturally in the environment as part of bacterial defense mechanisms, even in areas with minimal human influence [2]. However, human-driven stressors -including chemical pollution from heavy metals and microplastics [3], [4], [5], [6], climate change, and other socioeconomic factors [7] further promote their spread. Lately, the potential impact of the COVID-19 on AMR has been increasingly investigated. Extensive antibiotic overuse, often without confirmed bacterial co-infections, was observed during the pandemic, with overprescription varying between high and low-income countries [8], [9]. However, the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on AMR appears to be geographically heterogenous, with several regions reporting increases in specific resistant organisms [10], [11], [12], while other observed stable or even declining AMR trends [11], [13], emphasizing the importance of region-specific surveillance. In Greece, findings from a tertiary care hospital in Athens demonstrated a significant post-pandemic increase in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPEs) and an altered carbapenemase epidemiology, with increased antimicrobial resistance rates to multiple antibiotics in 2022 and 2023 compared to their corresponding with 2020 [14]. This local epidemiological context, together with increased hospitalization pressure, ICU burden, broad-spectrum antibiotic use, and potential disruption of infection prevention and control practices during the pandemic, provides a rationale for investigating COVID-19-associated changes in carbapenemase ARGs in wastewater from the Attica region.

A key mechanism is the endogenous or acquired production of β-lactamases, which inactivate β-lactam antibiotics [15]. Carbapenems serve as last-line drugs against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infections; therefore, carbapenemases -transmitted mainly via horizontal gene transfer- pose a major clinical challenge, especially in intensive care units (ICUs) [16], [17]. The most clinically significant carbapenemases include Klebsiella Pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPC), New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM), and oxacillinase-48 (OXA-48)-like enzymes ([18]. Ιn Greece, both KPC- and NDM- producing strains have long been endemic, with KPC predominating [14].

ARGs spread rapidly across healthcare, environmental, animal and food systems, underscoring the need for coordinated “One Health” approach to AMR mitigation (WHO,2024). Urban and hospital wastewater are major environmental reservoirs of ARBs and ARGs [19], [20]. Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs)- with high microbial densities and conditions that promote gene exchange- serve as critical interfaces facilitating ARG selection, transfer and release into the environment [20]. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has emerged as a valuable tool for monitoring community health and is increasingly used to assess pathogen prevalence and transmission dynamics [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. WBE is also considered a promising complement to current AMR surveillance strategies, offering near real-time population-level data [26]. Previous studies have explored ARG occurrence, seasonal trends, correlation with antibiotic levels and their persistence across WWTP treatment stages [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. Limited work has addressed links between wastewater ARGs and clinical isolates [35], [36].

Despite growing interest, ARG surveillance in environmental matrices remains methodologically challenging due to the absence of standardized analytical methods [37]. Moreover, few studies have assessed how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced ARG distribution, and most seasonal analyses rely on pre-pandemic samples, leaving current spatiotemporal trends poorly characterized.

In this context, the present study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the occurrence and seasonal patterns of two clinically relevant carbapenemase genes, blaKPC and blaNDM in urban wastewater samples from the city of Attica. Target gene selection was based on their long-term clinical occurence in Greece. To our knowledge, this is among the first studies to use wastewater surveillance to examine post-COVID-19 shifts in ARG seasonality. More importantly, this work is integrated within the “One Health” framework, utilizing WBE as a holistic, non-invasive tool to monitor high-priority clinical targets within the urban aquatic environment. Urban wastewater represents a critical interface that bridges human epidemiological trends with environmental resistance signatures.

2. Materials & methods

2.1. Wastewater sampling and processing

24-h composite, flow proportional raw wastewater samples were collected from the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) of Attica, located on the island of Psyttaleia. The facility includes primary sedimentation, activated sludge with biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal, and secondary sedimentation [38] and serves a large proportion of the population in the Athens metropolitan area and its suburbs.

A total of 47 raw wastewater samples were collected monthly from July 2021 to September 2025 and analyzed for two prevalent ARGs (blaKPC and blaNDM) and the universally conserved bacterial marker 16 s rRNA. This sampling period encompasses the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, the implementation of associated restriction measures and their gradual relaxation in the post-COVID-19 period. Samples were collected in pre-cleaned 1 L high-density polyethylene bottles, transported to the laboratory at 4 °C, and processed immediately upon arrival.

Wastewater concentration and nucleic acid extraction were performed using the “Wizard Enviro Total Nucleic Acid” Kit (Promega, United States) following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 500 μL of protease solution was added to 40 mL wastewater samples, followed by incubation for 30 min at room temperature to facilitate protein digestion. Samples were then centrifuged at 3000 xg for 10 min to separate particulate matter, and the resulting supernatant was transferred into two clean sterile centrifuge tubes. Wastewater concentration was subsequently performed according to the Wizard® Enviro TNA kit protocol using PureYieldTM Binding Columns to capture and concentrate nucleic acids from the sample matrix. Total Nucleic acid extraction step was then carried out to obtain the TNA eluates, from which DNA was used for downstream analysis.

2.2. qPCR analysis

A 3-plex qPCR protocol was developed and optimized for the detection and quantification of the three genes. The oligonucleotide primers and probe sets (Integrated DNA Technologies, USA) were based on guidelines from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) with slight modifications and target evolutionarily conserved regions of the genome (Table S1). The optimized PCR reaction mix consisted of the following: 4.0 μL of PCR buffer (5×), 2 μL of Mg2+ (25 mM), 0.4 μL dNTPs (10 mM), 0.5 μL of BSA (10 μg/ μl), 0.6 Ll of primer mix (10μΜ each), 1 μL of probe mix (10μΜ each), 0.3 μL of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, USA) (5 units/μl), 2 μL of DNA template and nuclease- free H2O at a final volume of 20 μL. The Real-time qPCR assay was performed in the Touch CFX96™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio- Rad, USA) (92 °C/2 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C/30s, 60 °C/30s and 72 °C/30s). Negative and positive controls were used in each run to evaluate the performance of the assay.

Three synthetic DNA oligonucleotides were designed and used for the analytical validation of the assay (gBlocks; Integrated DNA Technologies, USA; Table S2). Each synthetic control contained the target sequences of blaKPC (126 bp), blaNDM (125 bp) and 16 s rRNA (200 bp), including all primer and probe binding sites. The synthetic oligos were reconstituted with Tris−EDTA (TE) buffer to a stock concentration of 10 ng/μL. 10-fold dilutions of the synthetic controls were prepared to generate standard curves for the three targets, assess the analytical performance of the assay and quantify sample copies numbers per reaction using Eq. (1).

copiesreaction=10Cqinterceptslope (1)

2.3. Development and analytical validation of the 3-plex qPCR assay

A specific and sensitive 3-plex qPCR assay was developed and optimized for the detection and quantification of blaKPC, blaNDM and 16S rRNA genes. Prior to application to raw wastewater samples, extensive optimization experiments were preformed and analytical performance of the assay was validated. In total, 47 samples met the required quality criteria and were included in the analysis.

2.3.1. Evaluation of polymerase options to reduce 16S rRNA background amplification

During assay development, a positive amplification signal for the 16S rRNA target was observed even in the absence of template DNA. This phenomenon is well documented as the ubiquity of bacteria in the environment means that laboratory reagents -particularly commercially available PCR enzymes- may contain trace amounts of bacterial DNA or may be insufficiently purified, leading to false-positive amplification signals [39], [40].

To address this issue, an alternative enzyme, GoTaq® DNA Polymerase (Promega, USA), was evaluated and shown to be more suitable for bacterial DNA detection under the conditions of this protocol. According to CDC guidelines, amplification of the 16S rRNA target in no-template control after 30 cycles was considered acceptable, whereas amplification before 30 cycles indicated potential contamination and invalidated the run [41] (Fig. S1).

2.3.2. Analytical validation

Synthetic controls containing known copy numbers of each target gene were combined at equal concentrations (105 copies/μl), and subsequently subjected to a series of 10-fold serial dilutions to generate four concentration levels (104, 103, 102 and 10 copies/μl). These dilutions series were employed to characterize the assay's linear dynamic range (LDR), limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ). All reactions were performed in triplicate, with the lowest concentration tested ten independent replicates to robustly estimate the LOD and LOQ (Table S3).

2.3.3. Analytical sensitivity

The analytical sensitivity was evaluated by estimating the LOD using quantification calibrators containing a known number of copies/μl prepared as previously mentioned. For each gene target, a calibration curve was generated using serial dilutions of external standards in triplicate for each concentration, ranging from 105 to 10 copies/ μL. The LOD and LOQ of the assay were determined at 5 copies/μl and 15 copies/μl for all the three genes. After back-calculation analysis, the LOD and LOQ were determined at 2500 copies/L and 8250 copies/L, respectively, based on calculations described elsewhere [42]. The linear regression plots (Cq values versus log10 of dilution factor) demonstrated excellent linearity, with correlation coefficients (R2) of 0.9998, 0.9999, and 0.9995 for blaKPC, blaNDM and 16 s rRNA, respectively, confirming a precise linear relationship (Fig. S2).

The newly developed 3-plex assay was additionally compared with its corresponding singleplex assays to investigate potential differences in Cq values between the methods. A concentration of 10,000 copies/μl of each target was analyzed using the 3-plex assay in the presence of all primer and probe sets, as well as in the corresponding singleplex assays containing only the target-specific primer and probe set. The comparable amplification performance that was observed between the singleplex and multiplex protocols based on Cq values is presented in Table S4.

2.3.4. Specificity of the assay

The analytical specificity of the assay was evaluated by amplifying each target individually. Three synthetic controls, each corresponding to one of the target genes, were used at a concentration of 104 copies/μl. No nonspecific amplification or cross-reactivity was observed among the three primer-probe sets. Each target yielded a positive signal exclusively in its designated fluorescence detection channel, with no signal was detectable signal in the remaining channels. These findings confirm that the assay demonstrates high analytical specificity and reliably discriminates among the individual ARG targets.

2.3.5. Statistical analysis

A Cross-Correlation Function (CCF) analysis was performed to evaluate the temporal relationships and identify potential time lags between SARS-CoV-2 loads and ARG concentrations in wastewater. Specifically, SARS-CoV-2 loads were cross-correlated against the abundance of blaKPC and blaNDM over a range of ±10 monthly lags. This time-series analysis was utilized to identify the specific lag periods at which the correlation coefficients (r) peaked and exceeded the upper and lower 95% confidence limits. The statistical analysis was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 26.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and the threshold for statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

2.4. Quantification of ARGs concentration in wastewater

The population served by the WWTP was estimated in real time for each sampling day using concentrations of the physicochemical parameter NH4-N, along with the corresponding daily flow rates. The number of inhabitants was estimated daily based on the population equivalent (PE) of 8.1 ± 0.37 g of NH4-N/day/ individual [43], [44]. Genome copies/L of each virus were back-calculated, and subsequently normalized to the estimated population and daily flow rates, following established methodologies [21], [42].

3. Results & discussion

3.1. Temporal dynamics of ARGs during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in wastewater

The yearly distribution of blaKPC, blaNDM, and 16S rRNA gene copies revealed distinct temporal trends across the 2021–2025 monitoring period (Table 1). The blaKPC gene was consistently detected throughout the study period, with concentrations increasing steadily and peaking in 2023, while blaNDM showed intermittent but pronounced surges, particularly in 2023. The 16S rRNA marker remained stable across all years, confirming uniform bacterial loads and extraction efficiency. Absolute copies/L and gene load normalized to 16 s rRNA (relative abundance) of the targets are provided in the Supplementary Material (Table S5).

Table 1.

Average copy numbers and detection rate of the three targets during the study period.

Year blaKPC
blaNDM
16 s rRNA
Average (copies/100 k) Detection rate (%) Average (copies/100 k) Detection rate (%) Average (copies/100 k) Detection rate (%)
2021 3.1 × 1011 66.7 0 9.8 × 1015 100
2022 4.8 × 1011 37.5 1.5 × 1011 25 1.0 × 1016 100
2023 4.2 × 1012 100 8.0 × 1010 91.7 4.3 × 1015 100
2024 6.2 × 1011 58.3 4.1 × 1010 8.3 5.60 × 1015 100
2025 6.9 × 1011 88.9 6.5 × 1010 66.7 6.1 × 1015 100

A temporal comparison of SARS-CoV-2 concentrations with blaKPC and blaNDM abundances revealed a consistent pattern in which ARG increases followed major SARS-CoV-2 peaks throughout the 2021–2025 monitoring period (Fig. 1). Across multiple waves, the wastewater data displayed clear temporal alignment between SARS-CoV-2 surges and subsequent rises in carbapenemase genes. For blaKPC, each substantial SARS-CoV-2 peak—most prominently in late 2021, early 2022, and winter 2022–2023—was followed by elevated blaKPC concentrations in the ensuing months. This lagged pattern was especially pronounced in 2023, during which blaKPC reached its highest concentrations yearly average shortly after one of the strongest viral peaks recorded in the study period. blaKPC levels remained elevated into 2024 and increased further in 2025, although they did not reach the levels observed in 2023 (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 and blaKPC trends during the study period, expressed in copies/100 k inhabitants.

The blaNDM gene showed a similar temporal pattern, though with more variability due to is absence in early years. After first appearing in 2022, blaNDM levels rose markedly from late 2022 through mid-2023, again following periods of heightened SARS-CoV-2 viral load. This alignment was evident both in the increase in detection frequency (from 25% in 2022 to 91.7% in 2023) and in the rise in average concentrations during the same period. Although blaNDM declined in 2024, levels increased again in 2025, matching the broader post-peak elevation pattern also observed for blaKPC (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Comparison of a) SARS-CoV-2 and blaNDM trends during the study period, expressed in copies/100 k inhabitants.

A Cross Correlation Function (CCF) analysis was performed between SARS-CoV-2 viral loads and blaKPC and blaNDM abundance, to statistically evaluate the temporal trends and identify potential time lags. The analysis revealed a moderate to strong, statistically significant positive correlation at a 9-month lag (r = 0.621, p < 0.05) for blaKPC and a 7-month lag (r = 0.681, p < 0.05) for blaNDM, where the correlation coefficients clearly exceeded the upper 95% confidence limit (Fig. S3). No significant immediate (Lag 0) or short-term correlations were observed. This cross-correlation at lag 9 and lag 7 statistically substantiates an environmental response in ARGs concentrations, demonstrating that the major peaks in ARG abundance in wastewater (Fig. 1, Fig. 2) are coupled with the high SARS-CoV-2 viral loads quantified in wastewater approximately 9 and 7 months prior, for blaKPC and blaNDM, respectively. However, this observation should be further explored across different settings and regions.

These findings agree with previous reports showing higher AMR rates in the post-pandemic period compared to pre-pandemic levels [12], [45]. The extensive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, including carbapenems, during the COVID-19 pandemic -often without confirmed bacterial co-infections [46] likely contributed to shifts in circulating carbapenemase types, particularly KPC and NDM.

Following the relaxation of restriction measures, AMR dissemination increased again and stabilized at elevated levels (Table 1). In Greece, a marked rise in carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales was documented during the pandemic, with KPC remaining dominant and a transition from VIM to NDM observed in 2022 and 2023 [14]. After the temporary suppression of AMR transmission during lockdowns, a resurgence was likely driven by the resumption of routine hospital activities and the restoration of international travel networks [47]. The higher antimicrobial resistance rates observed in 2023 could be attributed to the overall burden on the local healthcare system, the misuse of antibiotics, and the inadequate implementation of infection-control measures during the unprecedented pressure experienced by healthcare facilities throughout the peak phase of the pandemic in 2021 and 2022. These epidemiological trends align closely with the present wastewater surveillance data, which show a clear rise in blaKPC levels beginning in 2022, further supporting the post-pandemic amplification of AMR in the community.

3.2. Year-specific seasonal signatures and post-COVID-19 shifts in ARG levels in wastewater

Seasonal variation in ARG abundance did not follow a uniform pattern across the study period, indicating that seasonal effects were modulated by year-specific epidemiological and environmental conditions. In 2023 and 2024, both blaKPC and blaNDM exhibited their highest concentrations during the spring and summer months (Fig. 3a and b), representing an atypical warm-season elevation. In contrast, 2025 showed a shift toward autumn–winter peaks, a pattern more consistent with classical seasonal trends associated with colder periods [48], [49]. These contrasting patterns highlight that while seasonality influences ARG dynamics, its expression varies substantially across years and does not always align with traditional expectations.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

a) blaKPC and b) blaNDM trends per year in the post-pandemic period.

Published studies similarly report inconsistent seasonal signature. For example, Keer et al. observed highest bacterial diversity in winter but greater 16S rRNA gene abundance in summer [50], while Honda et al. reported seasonal differences in both ARG abundance and composition, with notable increase during summer months [51]. Other studies documented elevated ARG levels either in warmer seasons [50], [52] or in colder periods [48], [49], [53], [54] whereas some reported only minor seasonal variation [55]. Overall, the literature confirms that the seasonality of ARG occurrence remains ambiguous, with diverse and sometimes contradictory trends.

The present study contributes to this body of evidence by showing a post-pandemic shift in the seasonal distribution of blaKPC and blaNDM in Attica wastewater with pronounced peaks during the warmer months of 2023–2024. By 2025, the seasonal pattern resembled pre-pandemic observations, suggesting a gradual re-establishment of typical seasonal behavior following the disruptions of COVID-19 period. For the year-specific seasonal analysis, only years with sufficient monthly/seasonal representation and quantifiable ARG measurements were considered. Samples from 2021 and 2022 were included in the overall longitudinal and annual analyses but were not used for formal seasonal comparison because of incomplete seasonal coverage and the presence of values below the LOD, which could bias seasonal grouping.

4. Limitations of the study

Although the present study provides useful longitudinal information on the occurrence and temporal dynamics of blaKPC and blaNDM in wastewater from the Attica region, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, although the study is positioned within the One Health framework, it should be interpreted as a One Health–relevant environmental surveillance study rather than a comprehensive One Health investigation, since animal, food-chain, agricultural, downstream environmental, antibiotic consumption, hospital activity, and clinical isolate data were not directly included. Second, the monthly sampling frequency and the total number of analyzed samples may have limited the detection of short-term fluctuations, transient ARG peaks, and high-resolution seasonal patterns; therefore, the observed seasonal trends and temporal associations should be interpreted cautiously as indicative and hypothesis-generating. Future studies should include higher-frequency and spatially expanded wastewater sampling, additional upstream or sentinel sites, integration with clinical AMR surveillance and antibiotic-use data, hospital activity indicators, animal/agricultural sources, and downstream environmental monitoring to better characterize the drivers and transmission pathways of ARGs across the One Health continuum.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the impact of COVID-19 on the occurrence and seasonal patterns of two highly prevalent ARGs in Greece -blaKPC and blaNDM- though a five-year wastewater monitoring campaign (2021–2025). Our findings revealed remarkably low levels of both genes in 2021 and 2022, the peak years of the COVID-19 pandemic, when strict non-pharmaceutical interventions were implemented to limit the disease transmission. In 2023, following the relaxation of these measures, both genes showed a pronounced increase, characterized by high concentrations and high annual detection frequencies, followed by a gradual decline in subsequent years. blaNDM generally appeared at lower levels and with more variable detection rates, while blaKPC remained consistently prevalent through the study period.

A notable shift in seasonality was observed in 2023 and 2024, the years immediately following the pandemic peaks, during which both genes reached their highest levels in spring and summer, contrasting with patterns documented in pre-pandemic years. By 2025, concentrations had decreased, and seasonal trends resembled those of the pre-pandemic period, with higher levels detected during winter. Overall, our results indicate that the COVID-19 pandemic influenced both the dissemination and seasonal dynamics of these two major ARGs, further contributing to the spread of AMR in Greece. Statistical analysis confirmed a distinct time-lagged relationship, revealing a significant positive correlation at a 9-month lag (r = 0.621, p < 0.05) and a 7-month lag (r = 0 0.681, p < 0.05) for blaKPC and blaNDM, respectively. These findings confirm that the delayed increase of ARG concentrations in wastewater is significantly coupled with the preceding SARS-CoV-2 peaks. However, due to the complex factors affecting the dissemination of ARGs in communities, future studies are needed to elucidate the role of the COVID-19 pandemic on AMR shifts and to confirm the time lag periods between high SARS-CoV-2 loads and ARG elevated levels.

This study highlights the value of wastewater-based epidemiology not only for pathogen surveillance, but also for monitoring antibiotic-resistant agents, providing timely insights into the post-pandemic shifts in ARG behavior. From a “One Health” perspective, urban wastewater serves as a critical interface between human clinical pressures and the environment, acting as a repository for resistance genes shed by human populations. Our findings highlight that major public health threats, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, leave a distinct signature on the environmental resistome in Greece. Integrating long-term WBE data into global AMR surveillance frameworks aligns with the primary objectives of the “One Health” approach, demonstrating how environmental monitoring can reflect community-level epidemiological trends and inform mitigation strategies to limit the dissemination of critical threats like carbapenemase-producing organisms.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Anastasia Zafeiridou: Writing – original draft, Validation, Methodology. Foteini Pitaouli: Methodology. Georgia Georgakopoulou: Methodology. Nikolaos Thomaidis: Visualization, Resources, Project administration, Conceptualization. Athina Markou: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onehlt.2026.101503.

Contributor Information

Nikolaos Thomaidis, Email: ntho@chem.uoa.gr.

Athina Markou, Email: atmarkou@chem.uoa.gr.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (309.8KB, docx)

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • 1.Ho C.S., Wong C.T.H., Aung T.T., Lakshminarayanan R., Mehta J.S., Rauz S., McNally A., Kintses B., Peacock S.J., de la Fuente-Nunez C., Hancock R.E.W., Ting D.S.J. Antimicrobial resistance: a concise update. Lancet Microbe. 2025;6 doi: 10.1016/J.LANMIC.2024.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Rillig M.C., Li C., Rodríguez del Río Á., Zhu Y.G., Jin L. Elevated levels of antibiotic resistance genes as a factor of human-caused global environmental change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2024;30:2020–2025. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Balta I., Lemon J., Gadaj A., Cretescu I., Stef D., Pet I., Stef L., McCleery D., Douglas A., Corcionivoschi N. The interplay between antimicrobial resistance, heavy metal pollution, and the role of microplastics. Front. Microbiol. 2025;16 doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2025.1550587/FULL. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yi X., Liang J.L., Su J.Q., Jia P., Lu J. Li, Zheng J., Wang Z., Feng S. Wei, Luo Z. Hao, Ai H. Xia, Liao B., Shu W. Sheng, Li J. Tian, Zhu Y.G. Globally distributed mining-impacted environments are underexplored hotspots of multidrug resistance genes. ISME J. 2022;16:2099–2113. doi: 10.1038/S41396-022-01258-Z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Luo T., Dai X., Wei W., Xu Q., Ni B.J. Microplastics enhance the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in anaerobic sludge digestion by enriching antibiotic-resistant bacteria in surface biofilm and facilitating the vertical and horizontal gene transfer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57:14611–14621. doi: 10.1021/ACS.EST.3C02815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhu D., Ma J., Li G., Rillig M.C., Zhu Y.G. Soil plastispheres as hotspots of antibiotic resistance genes and potential pathogens. ISME J. 2022;16:521–532. doi: 10.1038/S41396-021-01103-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li W., Huang T., Liu C., Wushouer H., Yang X., Wang R., Xia H., Li X., Qiu S., Chen S., Ho H.C., Huang C., Shi L., Guan X., Tian G., Liu G., Ebi K.L., Yang L. Changing climate and socioeconomic factors contribute to global antimicrobial resistance. Nat. Med. 2025;316(31):1798–1808. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03629-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rabbi F., Banfield L., Munir M., Chagla Z., Mayhew A., de Souza R.J. Overprescription of antibiotics for treating hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a systematic review & meta-analysis. Heliyon. 2023;9 doi: 10.1016/J.HELIYON.2023.E20563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Petromelidou S., Anagnostopoulou K., Koronaiou L.A., Kalaronis D., Ainali N.M., Evgenidou E., Papageorgiou M., Christodoulou A., Lioumbas I., Kyzas G.Z., Mitropoulos A., Bikiaris D.N., Lambropoulou D.A. Exploring patterns of antibiotics during and after COVID-19 pandemic in wastewaters of northern Greece: potential adverse effects on aquatic environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;914 doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2023.169832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sakagianni A., Koufopoulou C., Koufopoulos P., Feretzakis G., Koumaki V. The impact of COVID-19 on the epidemiology of carbapenem resistance. Antibiotics. 2025;14:1–19. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14090916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Langford B.J., So M., Simeonova M., Leung V., Lo J., Kan T., Raybardhan S., Sapin M.E., Mponponsuo K., Farrell A., Leung E., Soucy J.P.R., Cassini A., MacFadden D., Daneman N., Bertagnolio S. Antimicrobial resistance in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Microbe. 2023;4:e179–e191. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00355-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abdelaziz Abdelmoneim S., Mohamed Ghazy R., Anwar Sultan E., Hassaan M.A., Anwar Mahgoub M. Antimicrobial resistance burden pre and post-COVID-19 pandemic with mapping the multidrug resistance in Egypt: a comparative cross-sectional study. Sci. Rep. 2024;141(14):7176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56254-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ahmed H., Abideen Z.U., Azmat A., Irfan M., Anjum S., Dirie A. Impact of COVID-19 on the prevalence of multi-drug-resistant bacteria: a literature review and meta-analysis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2025;11811(118):165. doi: 10.1007/S10482-025-02181-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Koumaki V., Voudanta E., Michelaki A., Orfanidou M., Vagiakou E., Vrioni G., Tsakris A. Changing epidemiology of carbapenemases among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in a Greek tertiary care hospital in Athens, 2020 to 2023 †. Antibiotics. 2025;14:1–18. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14030239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mutuku C., Gazdag Z., Melegh S. Occurrence of antibiotics and bacterial resistance genes in wastewater: resistance mechanisms and antimicrobial resistance control approaches. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2022;38:1–27. doi: 10.1007/s11274-022-03334-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scaglione G., Perego M., Colaneri M., Genovese C., Brivio F., Covizzi A., Viaggi B., Bandera A., Gori A., Finazzi S., Palomba E. Understanding the burden of antibiotic resistance: a decade of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections in Italian intensive care units. Front. Microbiol. 2024;15 doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2024.1405390/BIBTEX. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Li Q., Zhou X., Yang R., Shen X., Li G., Zhang C., Li P., Li S., Xie J., Yang Y. Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) in ICUs: resistance genes, therapeutics, and prevention – a comprehensive review. Front. Public Health. 2024;12 doi: 10.3389/FPUBH.2024.1376513/FULL. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alvisi G., Curtoni A., Fonnesu R., Piazza A., Signoretto C., Piccinini G., Sassera D., Gaibani P. Epidemiology and genetic traits of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales: a global threat to human health. Antibiotics. 2025;14:141. doi: 10.3390/ANTIBIOTICS14020141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kumar G., Balakrishna K., Mukhopadhyay C., Eshwara V.K. Characterization and comparative analysis of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli from hospital and municipal wastewater treatment plants. J. Water Health. 2024;22:2276–2288. doi: 10.2166/WH.2024.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.La Rosa M.C., Maugeri A., Favara G., La Mastra C., Magnano San Lio R., Barchitta M., Agodi A. The impact of wastewater on antimicrobial resistance: a scoping review of transmission pathways and contributing factors. Antibiotics. 2025;14:131. doi: 10.3390/ANTIBIOTICS14020131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Galani A., Aalizadeh R., Kostakis M., Markou A., Alygizakis N., Lytras T., Adamopoulos P.G., Peccia J., Thompson D.C., Kontou A., Karagiannidis A., Lianidou E.S., Avgeris M., Paraskevis D., Tsiodras S., Scorilas A., Vasiliou V., Dimopoulos M.A., Thomaidis N.S. SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance data can predict hospitalizations and ICU admissions. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;804 doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.150151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zafeiriadou A., Georgakopoulou G., Pitaouli F., Thomaidis N., Markou A. One assay, nine targets: advancing viral surveillance with multiplex RT-ddPCR. Anal. Chem. 2025 doi: 10.1021/ACS.ANALCHEM.5C04372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zafeiriadou A., Kaltsis L., Kostakis M., Kapes V., Thomaidis N.S., Markou A. Wastewater surveillance of the most common circulating respiratory viruses in Athens: the impact of COVID-19 on their seasonality. Sci. Total Environ. 2023;900 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Alshehri B., Birch O.N., Greaves J.C. Monitoring multiple sexually transmitted pathogens through wastewater surveillance. Pathogens. 2025;14:562. doi: 10.3390/PATHOGENS14060562/S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen W., Bibby K. Temporal, spatial, and methodological considerations in wastewater-based epidemiology for sexually transmitted infections. ACS EST Water. 2025;5:2533–2546. doi: 10.1021/ACSESTWATER.5C00104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chau K.K., Barker L., Budgell E.P., Vihta K.D., Sims N., Kasprzyk-Hordern B., Harriss E., Crook D.W., Read D.S., Walker A.S., Stoesser N. Systematic review of wastewater surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in human populations. Environ. Int. 2022;162 doi: 10.1016/J.ENVINT.2022.107171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sims N., Kannan A., Holton E., Jagadeesan K., Mageiros L., Standerwick R., Craft T., Barden R., Feil E.J., Kasprzyk-Hordern B. Antimicrobials and antimicrobial resistance genes in a one-year city metabolism longitudinal study using wastewater-based epidemiology. Environ. Pollut. 2023;333 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sun S., Wang Q., Wang N., Yang S., Qi H. High-risk antibiotics positively correlated with antibiotic resistance genes in five typical urban wastewater. J. Environ. Manag. 2023;342 doi: 10.1016/J.JENVMAN.2023.118296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang Y., Hu Y., Li X., Gao L., Wang S., Jia S., Shi P., Li A. Prevalence of antibiotics, antibiotic resistance genes, and their associations in municipal wastewater treatment plants along the Yangtze River basin, China. Environ. Pollut. 2024;348 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wang Z., Cai M., Du P., Li X. Wastewater surveillance for antibiotics and resistance genes in a river catchment: spatiotemporal variations and the main drivers. Water Res. 2024;251 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.121090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cheng S., Zhang R., Liu Q., He S., Sun J., Xing L. Occurrence, removal, and ecological risk of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in township wastewater treatment plants in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024;323(32):1223–1235. doi: 10.1007/S11356-024-35832-Z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Drane K., Sheehan M., Whelan A., Ariel E., Kinobe R. The role of wastewater treatment plants in dissemination of antibiotic resistance: source, measurement, removal and risk assessment. Antibiotics. 2024;13:668. doi: 10.3390/ANTIBIOTICS13070668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Knight M.E., Webster G., Perry W.B., Baldwin A., Rushton L., Pass D.A., Cross G., Durance I., Muziasari W., Kille P., Farkas K., Weightman A.J., Jones D.L. National-scale antimicrobial resistance surveillance in wastewater: a comparative analysis of HT qPCR and metagenomic approaches. Water Res. 2024;262 doi: 10.1016/J.WATRES.2024.121989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Knight M.E., Farkas K., Kiss A., Jones D.L. National-scale insights into AMR transmission along the wastewater-environment continuum. Water Res. 2025;282 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2025.123603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kelly S.A., O’Connell N.H., Thompson T.P., Dillon L., Wu J., Creevey C., Kiely P., Slevin B., Powell J., Gilmore B.F., Dunne C.P. Large-scale characterization of hospital wastewater system microbiomes and clinical isolates from infected patients: profiling of multi-drug-resistant microbial species. J. Hosp. Infect. 2023;141:152–166. doi: 10.1016/J.JHIN.2023.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Leopold M., Kabicher A., Pap I.J., Ströbele B., Zarfel G., Farnleitner A.H., Kirschner A.K.T. A comparative study on antibiotic resistant Escherichia coli isolates from Austrian patients and wastewater-influenced Danube River water and biofilms. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 2024;258 doi: 10.1016/J.IJHEH.2024.114361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Malcom H.B., Bowes D.A. Use of wastewater to monitor antimicrobial resistance trends in communities and implications for wastewater-based epidemiology: a review of the recent literature. Microorganisms. 2025;13:1–14. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13092073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Thomaidis N.S., Gago-Ferrero P., Ort C., Maragou N.C., Alygizakis N.A., Borova V.L., Dasenaki M.E. Reflection of socioeconomic changes in wastewater: licit and illicit drug use patterns. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016;50:10065–10072. doi: 10.1021/ACS.EST.6B02417/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/ES-2016-02417Y_0001.JPEG. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Masalov Y.K., Heydarov R.N., Shashkov I.A., Chebotar I.V., Zasedatelev A.S., Mayansky N.A., Mikhailovich V.M. Exogenous contaminating DNA in Taq polymerases: a method to avoid false-positive results when detecting the blaTEM gene. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2019;160:36–41. doi: 10.1016/J.MIMET.2019.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Skidmore A.M., Bradfute S.B. Bacterial DNA contamination of commercial PCR enzymes: considerations for microbiome protocols and analysis. Microorganisms. 2025;13:732. doi: 10.3390/MICROORGANISMS13040732/S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Laboratory Testing for Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase (KPC) and New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase (NDM) in Gram-Negative Bacteria | Gram-Negative Bacteria. CDC; 2025. https://www.cdc.gov/gram-negative-bacteria/php/laboratories/index.html (accessed November 28, 2025) [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dimitrakopoulos L., Kontou A., Strati A., Galani A., Kostakis M., Kapes V., Lianidou E., Thomaidis N., Markou A. Evaluation of viral concentration and extraction methods for SARS-CoV-2 recovery from wastewater using droplet digital and quantitative RT-PCR. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2022;6 doi: 10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Been F., Rossi L., Ort C., Rudaz S., Delémont O., Esseiva P. Population normalization with ammonium in wastewater-based epidemiology: application to illicit drug monitoring. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014;48:8162–8169. doi: 10.1021/es5008388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.van Nuijs A.L.N., Mougel J.F., Tarcomnicu I., Bervoets L., Blust R., Jorens P.G., Neels H., Covaci A. Sewage epidemiology - a real-time approach to estimate the consumption of illicit drugs in Brussels, Belgium. Environ. Int. 2011;37:612–621. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2010.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Petrakis V., Panopoulou M., Rafailidis P., Lemonakis N., Lazaridis G., Terzi I., Papazoglou D., Panagopoulos P. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial resistance and management of bloodstream infections. Pathogens. 2023;12:780. doi: 10.3390/PATHOGENS12060780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lansbury L., Lim B., Baskaran V., Lim W.S. Co-infections in people with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Infect. 2020;81:266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.05.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Baum J.H.J., Dörre A., Reichert F., Noll I., Feig M., Eckmanns T., Sandfort M., Haller S. Changes in incidence and epidemiology of antimicrobial resistant pathogens before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany, 2015–2022. BMC Microbiol. 2025;251(25):51. doi: 10.1186/S12866-024-03723-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yu Q., Feng T., Yang J., Su W., Zhou R., Wang Y., Zhang H., Li H. Seasonal distribution of antibiotic resistance genes in the Yellow River water and tap water, and their potential transmission from water to human. Environ. Pollut. 2022;292 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Zhao L., Lv Z., Lin L., Li X., Xu J., Huang S., Chen Y., Fu Y., Peng C., Cao T., Ke Y., Xia X. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on profiles of antibiotic-resistant genes and bacteria in hospital wastewater. Environ. Pollut. 2023;334:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Keer A., Oza Y., Mongad D., Ramakrishnan D., Dhotre D., Ahmed A., Zumla A., Shouche Y., Sharma A. Assessment of seasonal variations in antibiotic resistance genes and microbial communities in sewage treatment plants for public health monitoring. Environ. Pollut. 2025;375 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Honda R., Matsuura N., Sorn S., Asakura S., Morinaga Y., Van Huy T., Sabar M.A., Masakke Y., Hara-Yamamura H., Watanabe T. Transition of antimicrobial resistome in wastewater treatment plants: impact of process configuration, geographical location and season. Npj Clean Water. 2023;61(6):46. doi: 10.1038/s41545-023-00261-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Son D., Aleta P., Park M., Yoon H., Cho K.H., Kim Y.M., Kim S. Seasonal changes in antibiotic resistance genes in rivers and reservoirs in South Korea. J. Environ. Qual. 2018;47:1079–1085. doi: 10.2134/jeq2017.12.0493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Caucci S., Karkman A., Cacace D., Rybicki M., Timpel P., Voolaid V., Gurke R., Virta M., Berendonk T.U. Seasonality of antibiotic prescriptions for outpatients and resistance genes in sewers and wastewater treatment plant outflow. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016;92:1–10. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Guruge S.K., Han Z., Dai S., Islam A., Ben W., Tian Z., Zhang Y., Yang M. Seasonal variation of antibiotic resistance genes in activated sludge of a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plant: contribution of activated sludge functional taxa and clinically relevant taxa. Water Res. 2025;268 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yuan Q. Bin, Guo M.T., Yang J. Monitoring and assessing the impact of wastewater treatment on release of both antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their typical genes in a Chinese municipal wastewater treatment plant. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts. 2014;16:1930–1937. doi: 10.1039/c4em00208c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material

mmc1.docx (309.8KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.


Articles from One Health are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES