Abstract
Adult small bowel intussusception is an uncommon clinical condition and is most frequently associated with a single pathological lead point. The occurrence of multiple synchronous small bowel intussusceptions in the absence of an identifiable cause is exceptionally rare and usually associated with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. We report the case of a 32-year-old male who presented with persistent lower abdominal pain and was found on imaging to have a short-segment small bowel intussusception without evidence of ischemia. Diagnostic laparoscopy revealed multiple transient entero-enteric intussusceptions occurring at several locations along the small bowel, all of which reduced easily with manipulation; however, they would intussuscept with ongoing peristalsis. No pathological lead point was identified. The patient recovered uneventfully, and follow-up imaging demonstrated no small bowel lesions and no recurrence. This case highlights the diagnostic challenges and management considerations associated with idiopathic, multifocal adult small bowel intussusception.
Keywords: intussusception, lead point, operation, small bowel, transition point
Introduction
Intussusception is defined as the telescoping of one segment of the gastrointestinal tract into an adjacent segment, potentially leading to bowel obstruction, compromised perfusion, and ischemia [1,2]. While intussusception is a common cause of abdominal pain in children, it is rare in adults, accounting for approximately 1-5% of intestinal obstructions [3]. Unlike pediatric cases, adult intussusception is typically associated with a well-defined pathological lead point, most commonly neoplastic in nature [2].
Idiopathic intussusception without an identifiable lead point is uncommon in adults, and the presence of multiple simultaneous small bowel intussusceptions is exceedingly rare [4]. With the increasing use of cross-sectional imaging, transient and clinically insignificant intussusceptions are being detected more frequently, complicating clinical decision-making [5]. We present a rare case of multiple transient small bowel intussusceptions identified intraoperatively in an adult patient.
Case presentation
A 32-year-old male presented to Royal Perth Hospital with a one-month history of lower abdominal pain. The pain was described as a constant pulling sensation with intermittent exacerbations, worsened by sitting upright and relieved by standing or lying flat. He also reported reduced appetite. He developed worsening abdominal pain, nausea, and one episode of vomiting, prompting presentation to the emergency department. His last bowel motion was a day before presentation, and there were no other gastrointestinal or systemic symptoms.
His past medical history was notable as he had recently undergone an abdominoplasty with repair of rectus diastasis and two umbilical hernias four months prior. He was not on any regular medications. He was a current smoker (smoking one cigarette a day) and only consumed alcohol occasionally. There was no history of recent illness or travel.
On examination, the patient was well in appearance with vital signs within normal limits. The blood pressure was 120/60 mmHg, the heart rate was 84 beats per minute, the respiratory rate was 17 breaths per minute, and the oxygen saturation was 96% on room air. Serial abdominal examination revealed a soft but mildly distended abdomen with localized tenderness in the left lower quadrant and associated rebound tenderness. No palpable masses or hernias were identified. The laboratory findings are detailed in Table 1.
Table 1. Laboratory investigations.
| Parameters | Obtained values | Reference range |
| Hemoglobin | 148 g/L | 135–175 g/L |
| White cell count | 12.78 × 10⁹/L | 4–11 × 10⁹/L |
| C-reactive protein | 2.2 mg/L | <5 mg/L |
| Lactate | 1.1 mmol/L | <2 mmol/L |
CT of the abdomen and pelvis revealed a short-segment small bowel-to-small bowel intussusception measuring approximately 3 cm in the right abdomen, with no identifiable lead point. A proximal small bowel loop was mildly dilated to approximately 3 cm. Additional findings included segmental wall thickening involving proximal jejunal loops in the left upper quadrant. There were no radiological features of bowel ischemia. Mild splenomegaly was also noted. The image of the CT scan shown in Figure 1 illustrates a mushroom sign, with the CR scan shown in Figure 2 revealing the target sign. Figure 3 presents the coronal view of the CT of the patient demonstrating the extent of dilatation of the small bowel.
Figure 1. CT scan of the abdomen demonstrating an area of intussusception resulting in a mushroom sign.
Figure 2. CT scan of the abdomen demonstrating a different area of intussusception with the target sign and proximal thickened jejunal bowel loops.
Figure 3. Coronal view demonstrating dilated loops of the small bowel measuring 35 mm.
Operative approach and findings
The patient was taken to the theater secondary to the clinical picture and imaging findings. Preoperatively, nasogastric decompression and intravenous fluid hydration were performed. He underwent diagnostic laparoscopy using a 10 mm 30̊® camera and two 5 mm working ports.
Multiple areas of intussusception within the small bowel were discovered; the most proximal was 20 cm from the ligament of Treitz, and the most distal was 60 cm from the terminal ileum. During a systematic small bowel run, several segments were observed to intussuscept dynamically with ongoing peristalsis and to reduce spontaneously or with gentle manipulation. All affected segments were easily decompressed, and the bowel appeared viable throughout, with no evidence of ischemia, obstruction, or intraluminal pathology. There were no pathological mesenteric lymph nodes to suggest inflammation or infection as a cause for mucosal edema to cause dysrhythmic peristalsis.
For intraoperative documentation and future localization, 5-mm Ligaclips were placed at the most proximal intussusception site, with additional clips placed at more distal locations; however, dynamic intussception did not recur at these positions after reduction.
Figure 4 demonstrates the laparoscopic view with multiple points of intussuception, while Figure 5 reveals the most proximal point of intussuception at the duodenojejunal flexure. Figure 6 reveals the intraoperative image of the bowel after manipulation, noting white concentric serosal rings.
Figure 4. Laparoscopy view with multiple points of intussception demonstrated by green arrows.
Figure 5. Laparoscopy view showing the most proximal point of intussception by the duodenojejunal flexure.
Figure 6. Laparoscopy view. After manipulation of the intussception, white concentric serosal rings are noted (grey arrow).
Postoperative recovery and discharge
The patient’s postoperative recovery was uncomplicated. Nasogastric decompression was discontinued on postoperative day three following the return of bowel function, and oral intake was gradually resumed. He remained clinically stable with resolution of abdominal pain and no further gastrointestinal symptoms. The patient was discharged home on postoperative day five with a plan for outpatient magnetic resonance enterography.
Histopathology review
As no bowel resection was performed, no histopathological specimens were obtained for analysis.
Follow-up imaging
Magnetic resonance enterography was subsequently performed and demonstrated no abnormalities of the small bowel, with no evidence of recurrent intussusception or an identifiable underlying cause. Figure 7 shows the coronal section of the MRI revealing a normal small bowel appearance with no obvious abnormalities.
Figure 7. MRI showing no abnormalities.
Discussion
Adult intussusception is an uncommon diagnosis and is most often associated with an underlying pathological lead point. Entero-enteric intussusception confined to the small bowel carries a lower risk of malignancy compared with colonic involvement but still warrants careful evaluation [1]. The pathophysiology of adult intussusception remains incompletely understood; however, disruption of coordinated peristalsis due to a focal lesion or altered bowel wall compliance is thought to play a role.
In the absence of an identifiable lead point, proposed mechanisms include transient dysrhythmic contractions, submucosal edema, or functional disturbances in bowel motility. Reports of multiple synchronous small bowel intussusceptions in adults are exceedingly rare [3]. Previously published cases have described similar findings in which multiple short-segment intussusceptions reduced spontaneously or with minimal manipulation, without evidence of ischemia or obstruction, supporting a functional rather than structural etiology [2]. This is the first case to describe ongoing intussception despite manipulation and reduction, likely due to dysrhythmic peristalsis [3].
CT remains the most useful diagnostic modality in adults presenting with non-specific abdominal pain and suspected intussusception [6]. However, with improved imaging resolution, transient and clinically insignificant intussusceptions are increasingly detected, creating uncertainty regarding the need for surgical intervention. While short-segment intussusceptions without obstruction or ischemia may resolve spontaneously, persistent or progressive symptoms often necessitate operative exploration [7].
Surgical management of adult intussusception remains controversial. In idiopathic cases without evidence of ischemia or malignancy, laparoscopic reduction without resection is generally favored to preserve bowel length and minimize morbidity [8]. Conversely, resection without reduction is recommended when a pathological lead point or compromised bowel is suspected [9,10]. In this case, laparoscopy allowed direct visualization of dynamic, transient intussusceptions and facilitated safe reduction without bowel resection.
Conclusions
This case describes a rare presentation of multiple transient idiopathic small bowel intussusceptions in an adult patient without an identifiable lead point. It highlights the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis in adults presenting with atypical or persistent abdominal pain. Diagnostic laparoscopy plays a crucial role in confirming the diagnosis and guiding management. In carefully selected patients, laparoscopic reduction without resection can be performed safely with excellent clinical outcomes.
Disclosures
Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:
Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.
Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.
Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Vinod Ramachandran, Bhovineey Ramanathan, Linda Vu, Patrick Tan
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Vinod Ramachandran, Bhovineey Ramanathan, Linda Vu, Patrick Tan
Drafting of the manuscript: Vinod Ramachandran, Bhovineey Ramanathan, Linda Vu, Patrick Tan
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Vinod Ramachandran, Bhovineey Ramanathan, Linda Vu, Patrick Tan
Supervision: Vinod Ramachandran, Bhovineey Ramanathan, Linda Vu, Patrick Tan
References
- 1.Adult intussusception: a case report. Haidaran I, Haidaran AI. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10074585/ Int J Surg Case Rep. 2023;105:107977. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2023.107977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Adult intussusception. Azar T, Berger DL. Ann Surg. 1997;226:134–138. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199708000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ileocecal intussusception in an adult: the laparoscopic approach. McKay R. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3016128/ JSLS. 2006;10:250–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Adult intestinal intussusception: CT appearances and identification of a causative lead point. Kim YH, Blake MA, Harisinghani MG, Archer-Arroyo K, Hahn PF, Pitman MB, Mueller PR. Radiographics. 2006;26:733–744. doi: 10.1148/rg.263055100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adult intussusception: a retrospective review of 41 cases. Wang N, Cui XY, Liu Y, Long J, Xu YH, Guo RX, Guo KJ. https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/figures/v15/i26/3303.htm. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3303–3308. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Colonic intussusception in adults: a case report of an unusual cause of abdominal pain. Bustamante Sánchez LF, Rivera Jiménez EJ, Vela Martínez MI, Castro Segovia A, Cortés Sánchez JL. https://www.cureus.com/articles/307787-colonic-intussusception-in-adults-a-case-report-of-an-unusual-cause-of-abdominal-pain. Cureus. 2025;17:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.93858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Clinical effect and prognosis of laparoscopic surgery on colon cancer complicated with intestinal obstruction patients. Wu PH, Ta ZQ. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025;17:101609. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Uncommon ileo-cecal intussusception in adults: a case report of diagnosis and management. Ngwengi Y, Beugheum C, Ottou C, Mindjeme BF, Soh J, Ngoulla R. https://amjcaserep.com/abstract/full/idArt/946853. Am J Case Rep. 2025;26:0. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.946853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.A rare case of idiopathic ileocolic intussusception in an adult. Mehmood M, Yaqoob U, Rage KA, Khan H, Abbasi MR, Samo KA. https://medpharmareports.com/index.php/mpr/article/view/1847. Med Pharm Rep. 2021;94:516–520. doi: 10.15386/mpr-1847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.The diagnosis and management of adult intussusception. Begos DG, Sandor A, Modlin IM. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9074370/ Am J Surg. 1997;173:88–94. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00419-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







