ABSTRACT
A general and modular catalytic enantioselective route to 5‐substituted chiral oxazolines has been developed via palladium‐catalyzed intramolecular asymmetric allylic amidation. This strategy employs readily available racemic 2‐substituted‐5‐styryl oxazolidinones as substrates. Key to the success is the identification of a sterically hindered biphenol‐derived phosphoramidite ligand, which, in combination with Pd2(dba)3, promotes the cyclization with high efficiency and enantiocontrol. The reaction demonstrates broad substrate scope and excellent functional group tolerance, accommodating a wide range of sterically diverse 2‐substituents and electronically varied aryl allylic units, delivering the desired 5‐vinyl oxazolines in good yields with high enantioselectivity (up to 99% ee).
Keywords: asymmetric allylic amidation, chiral oxazolines, enantioselectivity, oxazolidinones, palladium
A highly efficient palladium‐catalyzed asymmetric intramolecular allylic amidation of racemic 2‐substituted‐5‐styryl oxazolidinones is developed for 5‐substituted chiral oxazolines. With a sterically hindered biphenol‐derived phosphoramidite/Pd2(dba)3 catalyst, the reaction delivers products with up to 99% ee and broad substrate scope, enabling gram‐scale synthesis and representing the general catalytic enantioselective route to these N,O‐heterocycles.

1. Introduction
Chiral N,O‐heterocycles represent a privileged structural class commonly found in natural products and contemporary pharmaceuticals [1, 2]. In particular, oxazolines and their derivatives have garnered sustained interest owing to their broad range of biological activities, such as antifungal, antiviral, antitumor, anti‐inflammatory, and analgesic properties (Figure 1), as well as their valuable role as chiral ligands in asymmetric catalysis [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. While 4‐substituted chiral oxazolines have been extensively studied and are widely represented in bioactive molecules and catalytic systems, their 5‐substituted counterparts have received comparatively less attention in terms of general and modular asymmetric access [11]. In particular, the enantioselective construction of 5‐substituted oxazolines independent of chiral amino alcohols derived from natural amino acids remains a synthetically attractive but challenging objective. Consequently, the development of catalytic enantioselective routes to such heterocyclic architectures has become an active area of investigation. To date, established strategies encompass organocatalytic asymmetric halocyclization of unsaturated amides [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18] and transition‐metal‐catalyzed approaches as shown in Scheme 1a [19, 20]. Representative examples comprise the ruthenium‐catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation of substituted oxazoles reported by the Kuwano group [19], and the palladium‐catalyzed asymmetric coupling–cyclization of N‐allenamides with aryl or alkenyl iodides developed developed by Ma and coworkers [20], which provide efficient access to various 5‐substituted oxazoline derivatives. Despite these advances, a general, catalytic, and stereocontrolled method for assembling structurally diverse 5‐substituted chiral oxazolines from readily available starting materials remains highly desirable.
FIGURE 1.

Selected natural products and drugs containing oxazoline with chiral centers at 5‐position.
SCHEME 1.

(A) Known methods for the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of 5‐oxazolines. (B) This work: Palladium‐catalyzed intramolecular enantioselective synthesis of 5‐Substituted oxazolines.
Recent advances in transition‐metal‐catalyzed asymmetric allylic alkylation (AAA) have furnished key mechanistic understanding and reliable synthetic methodologies, demonstrating considerable potential for the assembly of complex chiral molecules, especially heterocyclic frameworks [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. In this context, Feringa and coworkers reported in 2014 the pioneering enantioselective iridium‐catalyzed intramolecular allylic substitution using an amide oxygen as the nucleophile, enabling efficient synthesis of benzoxazine derivatives along with a single example of a 5‐vinyl oxazoline with high stereocontrol [30]. More recently, Dong and colleagues described an iridium‐catalyzed kinetic resolution of racemic benzoxazinones via intramolecular asymmetric allylation, delivering a range of chiral products in moderate to good yields with excellent enantioselectivity [31]. Despite these notable achievements, palladium‐catalyzed allylic substitution approaches toward chiral oxazolines have predominantly focused on diastereoselective transformations; to the best of our knowledge, a general catalytic enantioselective route to 5‐substituted chiral oxazolines via palladium‐catalyzed AAA has not been reported [32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37]. To address this gap, we envisioned that 5‐styryl oxazolidinones could serve as suitable precursors for conversion into the target 5‐oxazolines through an intramolecular palladium‐catalyzed asymmetric allylic amidation (Scheme 1b). This strategy would not only establish a direct and versatile catalytic enantioselective entry to this valuable heterocyclic scaffold, but also leverage the broad synthetic applicability of palladium catalysis for further molecular elaboration and diversification.
2. Results and Discussion
Using (E)‐1‐isobutyryl‐4‐styrylpyrrolidin‐2‐one 1a as the model substrate in the presence of Pd(OAc)2 in toluene at 0°C, various chiral phosphine ligands were examined (Table 1, entry 1−12). Phosphoramidite‐type ligands showed promising catalytic performance (see Supporting Information). Subsequent systematic evaluation of chiral phosphoramidite ligands revealed that the binaphthol‐derived phosphoramidite bearing a chiral dibenzylamine moiety afforded moderate enantioselectivity (36% ee, entry 5). Modification of the 8H‐binaphthol backbone did not improve the enantioselectivity of product 2a. Replacing the 8H‐binaphthol unit with biphenol‐derived phosphite (ligand L6) significantly enhanced the enantioselectivity (entry 6). Further structural tuning of the chiral diamine component demonstrated that sterically hindered, electron‐rich variants led to better outcomes. Optimization of phosphoramidite ligands L7–L10 highlighted the importance of steric bulk: the bulkiest ligand L10 provided 2a in 68% yield with 83% ee at 0°C (entry 12). Further screening of reaction solvents and palladium sources identified toluene and Pd2(dba)3 as optimal, delivering the asymmetric allylic amidation product 2a in 74% yield and 88% ee (entry 18).
TABLE 1.
Optimization of reaction conditions a .
|
| Entry | Ligand | T (°C) | Solvent | [Pd] | Yield (%) b | ee (%) c |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | L1 | 30 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 40 | 5 |
| 2 | L2 | 30 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 21 | 20 |
| 3 | L3 | 30 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 30 | 17 |
| 4 | L4 | 30 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 65 | 12 |
| 5 | L5 | 30 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 48 | 36 |
| 6 | L6 | 30 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 45 | 56 |
| 7 | L6 | 0 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 41 | 66 |
| 8 | L6 | −10 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 23 | 72 |
| 9 | L7 | 0 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 12 | 59 |
| 10 | L8 | 0 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 38 | 41 |
| 11 | L9 | 0 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 23 | 75 |
| 12 | L10 | 0 | Toluene | Pd(OAc)2 | 68 | 83 |
| 13 | L10 | 0 | PhF | Pd(OAc)2 | 36 | 82 |
| 14 | L10 | 0 | PhCl | Pd(OAc)2 | 56 | 80 |
| 15 | L10 | 0 | CH2Cl2 | Pd(OAc)2 | 62 | 63 |
| 16 | L10 | 0 | Acetone | Pd(OAc)2 | 60 | 61 |
| 17 | L10 | 0 | Toluene | [PdCl2(CH3CN)]2 | Trace | — |
| 18 | L10 | 0 | Toluene | Pd2(dba)3 | 74 | 88 |
| 19 | L10 | 0 | Toluene | Pd(acac)2 | 70 | 86 |
| 20 | L10 | 0 | Toluene | Pd(tBuCO2)2 | 69 | 70 |
Reaction comditions: 1a (0.1 mmol), [Pd] (5 mol%), Ligand (10 mol%), in 1.0 mL solvent, 0°C, 48 h.
Isolated yield.
The ee values were determined by chiral HPLC.
With the optimized conditions for the palladium‐catalyzed intramolecular asymmetric allylic amidation to construct 5‐substituted oxazolines established, we next explored the substrate scope of this transformation as depicted in Scheme 2. Systematic evaluation of a series of racemic 2‐substituted oxazolidinones revealed that increasing steric bulk at the 2‐position (Scheme 2a), which arises from substituents such as 1,1‐diethylmethyl, phenylisopropyl, tert‐butyl, and 1,1‐dimethylpropyl, significantly improved both the yield and enantioselectivity of the cyclization, furnishing the corresponding 5‐substituted oxazolines with excellent enantioselectivity (up to 97% ee). Similarly, oxazolidinones bearing other sterically demanding cyclic substituents at the 2‐position also underwent efficient cyclization to furnish the desired chiral 5‐substituted vinyl oxazolines (2g–2i, 2k–2m) in high yields (59%–88% yield) with excellent enantiocontrol (91%–98% ee). In contrast, substrates with less hindered 2‐substituents gave slightly lower enantioselectivities, as exemplified by products 2f and 2j. The absolute configuration of 2m was established by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis, enabling the stereochemical assignment of the remaining analogues by analogy.
SCHEME 2.

Palladium‐catalyzed intramolecular asymmetric allylic amidation: A general route to 5‐Substituted chiral oxazolines. areaction conditions: 1 (0.1 mmol), Pd2(dba)3 (2.5 mol%), L10 (10 mol%), in 1.0 mL toluene, 0°C, 72 h. bIsolated yield. cThe ee values were determined by chiral HPLC.
We next examined a diverse array of aryl‐substituted allylic moieties in this allylic amidation/cyclization reaction (Scheme 2b). Substrates bearing para‐ or meta‐substituted aryl groups, irrespective of their electronic nature (encompassing electron‐withdrawing substituents such as NO2, F, Cl, and Br as well as electron‐donating groups such as tert‐butyl and methyl), underwent efficient cyclization to furnish the corresponding chiral 5‐substituted oxazolines 2n–2u and 2w–2z in 59%–81% yield with 86%–96% ee. Furthermore, naphthyl‐functionalized allylic oxazolidinones proved compatible, delivering products 2v and 2aa in moderate yields with 82%–92% ee. Despite the broad generality demonstrated by the substrates described above, the replacement of the alkenyl substituent with heteroaromatic groups such as furan and thiophene proved challenging. For the furan‐ and thiophene‐containing substrates, the desired cyclization proceeded, albeit with low enantioselectivities, giving products 2ab and 2ac in 30% ee and 35% ee, respectively. Likewise, when the alkenyl group was substituted with aliphatic moieties such as cyclohexyl, only trace amounts of the desired product 2ad were detected, and the starting materials remained largely unconsumed. To further demonstrate the synthetic utility of this method, several commercially available carboxylic acid‐containing pharmaceuticals, including valproic acid, gemfibrozil, and fenofibric acid, were derivatized into the corresponding 2‐substituted oxazolidinones. Subjecting these substrates to the standard catalytic conditions delivered the target products 2ae−2ag in good yields (69%–90%) with high to excellent enantioselectivities (82%–99% ee) (Scheme 2c).
To evaluate the synthetic utility of the Pd‐catalyzed intramolecular allylation for the enantioselective synthesis of 5‐substituted oxazolines, a gram‐scale transformation of racemic model substrate 1c was carried out, delivering the desired product 2c in 69% yield with 92% ee (Scheme 3a). As illustrated, the chiral 5‐substituted oxazoline product can undergo diverse downstream functionalization, highlighting its synthetic versatility (Scheme 3b). Reduction of 2c with aluminum hydride (AlH3, generated in situ from LiAlH4 and AlCl3) proceeded smoothly to afford β‐amino alcohol 3 in 52% yield without loss of enantiopurity (92% ee) [38]. The olefin moiety of 2e could be converted via ozonolysis/reduction to furnish hydroxymethyl derivative 4 in 66% yield with full retention of stereochemical integrity. Furthermore, the oxetane substituent at the 2‐position of 2 h was selectively hydrolyzed under acidic conditions to give diol 5 in 75% yield, while the oxazoline ring remained intact under these conditions.
SCHEME 3.

Scale‐up reaction and synthetic transformation.
Given the use of racemic 5‐arylvinyloxazolidinones in this study, we explored the potential involvement of kinetic resolution as shown in Scheme 4. Time‐dependent analysis of racemic 1c under the standard conditions was conducted by quenching the reaction at 24 and 48 h, respectively. Notably, the enantiomeric excess (ee) of product 2c remained excellent and unchanged in both cases (92% ee), while the recovered starting material exhibited ee values of 31% and 42%, respectively. These results demonstrate that a dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) of the racemic starting material operates, allowing the product enantiopurity to be preserved throughout the process. This behavior establishes robust stereocontrol within the system, highlighting its potential for the asymmetric synthesis of challenging targets.
SCHEME 4.

Kinetic resolution studies.
To predict the absolute configuration of the product, we propose a catalytic cycle for the model reaction as depicted in Scheme 5. Oxidative addition of substrate 1a to the Pd0 L10 complex, which is generated in situ by ligand exchange from Pd2(dba)3 and L10, affords intermediate A. Decarboxylation of this intermediate can lead to two intermediates, B and B′. Intermediate B is sterically less congested than the allyl‐Pd‐oxacyclic intermediate B′; in the latter, the amide substituent experiences significant steric repulsion with the amine moiety of the chiral ligand. Moreover, both B and B′ benefit from π–π stacking interactions between the aromatic ring and the biphenol unit of the ligand, which help stabilize the intermediates and favor the formation of B. Consequently, intermediate B preferentially undergoes trans nucleophilic attack to give the palladium–olefin complex C. Ligand dissociation from C regenerates the Pd(0)/L10 catalyst and delivers the desired product 2a with the observed R‐configuration. The critical role of π–π stacking interactions is further supported by substrate scope studies. For heteroaromatic substrates such as furan and thiophene, these interactions are weakened, resulting in lower enantioselectivities. In the case of aliphatic substrates, the absence of such interactions likely disfavors the transition state, leading to poor reactivity. These mechanistic insights will guide future ligand design to accommodate more challenging substrate classes.
SCHEME 5.

Proposed mechanism.
3. Conclusion
In summary, we have developed a general, modular catalytic enantioselective route to 5‐substituted chiral oxazolines via palladium‐catalyzed intramolecular asymmetric allylic amidation of readily accessible racemic substrates. Key to this success is the identification of a sterically hindered biphenol‐derived phosphoramidite ligand, which, together with Pd2(dba)3, enables efficient cyclization with broad substrate scope and excellent functional group tolerance, delivering products in good yields and high enantioselectivity (up to 99% ee). Gram‐scale synthesis confirms the method's practicality, proceeding efficiently without enantiocontrol erosion and providing a stereoselective platform for advancing chiral N,O‐heterocycle synthesis and related catalytic strategies.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section. Additional references cited within the Supporting Information [39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46].
Supporting File 1:chem71046‐sup‐0002‐SuppMat.pdf.
Supporting File 2: chem71046‐sup‐0002‐Data.zip.
Acknowledgments
Financial support was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22471107), the Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province of China (22ZD6FA006, 23ZDFA015, 24ZD13FA017, 24ZDFA003), Funda‐mental Research Funds for the Central Universities (lzujbky‐2023‐ct02).
Dedicated to Professor Jieping Zhu on the occasion of his 60th birthday
References
- 1. Tiz D. B., Bagnoli L., Rosati O., Marini F., Sancineto L., and Santi C., “Top Selling (2026) Small Molecule Orphan Drugs: A Journey Into Their Chemistry,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24 (2023): 930, 10.3390/ijms24020930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Vitaku E., Smith D. T., and Njardarson J. T., “Analysis of the Structural Diversity, Substitution Patterns, and Frequency of Nitrogen Heterocycles Among U.S. FDA Approved Pharmaceuticals,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 57 (2014): 10257, 10.1021/jm501100b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Jin Z., “Muscarine, Imidazole, Oxazole and Thiazole Alkaloids,” Natural Product Reports 26 (2009): 382, 10.1039/B718045B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Wang W.‐L., Yao D.‐Y., Gu M., et al., “Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Bisheterocycle‐Containing Compounds as Potential Anti‐Influenza Virus Agents,” Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 15 (2005): 528, 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.08.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Li S., Li D., Xiao T., Zhang S., Song Z., and Ma H., “Design, Synthesis, Fungicidal Activity, and Unexpected Docking Model of the First Chiral Boscalid Analogues Containing Oxazolines,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 64 (2016): 8927, 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Desimoni G., Faita G., and Jørgensen K. A., “C2‐symmetric Chiral Bis(oxazoline) Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis,” Chemical Reviews 106 (2006): 3516, 10.1021/cr0505324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hargaden G. C. and Guiry P. J., “Recent Applications of Oxazoline‐containing Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis,” Chemical Reviews 109 (2009): 2505, 10.1021/cr800400z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ollevier T., “Iron Bis(oxazoline) Complexes in Asymmetric Catalysis,” Catalysis Science & Technology 46 (2016): 41, 10.1039/C5CY01357G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Yang G. and Zhang W., “Renaissance of Pyridine‐oxazolines as Chiral Ligands for Asymmetric Catalysis,” Chemical Society Reviews 47 (2018): 1783–1810, 10.1039/C7CS00615B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Connon R., Roche B., Rokade B. V., and Guiry P. J., “Further Developments and Applications of Oxazoline‐Containing Ligands in Asymmetric Catalysis,” Chemical Reviews 121 (2021): 6373, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Frump J. A., “Oxazolines. Their Preparation, Reactions, and Applications,” Chemical Reviews 71 (1971): 483, 10.1021/cr60273a003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jaganathan A., Garzan A., Whitehead D. C., Staples R. J., and Borhan B., “A Catalytic Asymmetric Chlorocyclization of Unsaturated Amides,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50 (2011): 2593–2596, 10.1002/anie.201006910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Rauniyar V., Lackner A. D., Hamilton G. L., and Toste F. D., “Asymmetric Electrophilic Fluorination Using an Anionic Chiral Phase‐Transfer Catalyst,” Science 334 (2011): 1681–1684, 10.1126/science.1213918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Yin Q. and You S.‐L., “Enantioselective Chlorocyclization of Indole Derived Benzamides for the Synthesis of Spiro‐Indolines,” Organic Letters 15 (2013): 4266–4269, 10.1021/ol4020943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Kawato Y., Ono H., Kubota A., et al., “Highly Enantioselective Bromocyclization of Allylic Amides With a P/P = O Double‐Site Lewis Base Catalyst,” Chemistry—A European Journal 22 (2016): 2127–2133, 10.1002/chem.201503153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Nagao Y., Hisanaga T., Egami H., Kawato Y., and Hamashima Y., “Desymmetrization of Bisallylic Amides Through Catalytic Enantioselective Bromocyclization With BINAP Monoxide,” Chemistry—A European Journal 23 (2017): 16758–16762, 10.1002/chem.201704847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Abazid A. H., Hollwedel T.‐N., and Nachtsheim B. J., “Stereoselective Oxidative Cyclization of N‐allyl Benzamides to Oxaz(ol)Ines,” Organic Letters 23 (2021): 5076–5080, 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c01607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Yamashita K., Hirokawa R., Ichikawa M., et al., “Mechanistic Details of Asymmetric Bromocyclization With BINAP Monoxide: Identification of Chiral Proton‐Bridged Bisphosphine Oxide Complex and Its Application to Parallel Kinetic Resolution,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 144 (2022): 3913–3924, 10.1021/jacs.1c11816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kuwano R., Kameyama N., and Ikeda R., “Catalytic Asymmetric Hydrogenation of N‐Boc‐imidazoles and Oxazoles,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 133 (2011): 7312–7315, 10.1021/ja201543h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Luo H., Yang Z., Lin W., Zheng Y., and Ma S., “A Catalytic Highly Enantioselective Allene Approach to Oxazolines,” Chemical Science 9 (2018): 1964–1969, 10.1039/C7SC04079B. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Trost B. M., “Asymmetric Catalysis: An Enabling Science,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (2004): 5348–5355, 10.1073/pnas.0306715101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Trost B. M. and Crawley M. L., “Enantioselective Allylic Substitutions in Natural Product Synthesis,” Topics In Organometallic Chemistry 38 (2012): 321–340, 10.1007/3418_2011_13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zhuo C.‐X., Zheng C., and You S.‐L., “Transition‐Metal‐Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Dearomatization Reactions,” Accounts of Chemical Research 47 (2014): 2558–2573, 10.1021/ar500167f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Butt N. A. and Zhang W., “Transition Metal‐catalyzed Allylic Substitution Reactions With Unactivated Allylic Substrates,” Chemical Society Reviews 44 (2015): 7929–7967, 10.1039/C5CS00144G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Cheng Q., Tu H.‐F., Zheng C., Qu J.‐P., Helmchen G., and You S.‐L., “Iridium‐Catalyzed Asymmetric Allylic Substitution Reactions,” Chemical Reviews 119 (2019): 1855–1969, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Pàmies O., Margalef J., Cañellas S., et al., “Recent Advances in Enantioselective Pd‐Catalyzed Allylic Substitution: From Design to Applications,” Chemical Reviews 121 (2021): 4373–4505, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Richard F., Clark P., Hannam A., Keenan T., Jean A., and Arseniyadis S., “Pd‐Catalysed Asymmetric Allylic Alkylation of Heterocycles: A User's Guide,” Chemical Society Reviews 53 (2024): 1936–1983, 10.1039/D3CS00856H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Yuan Y., Ge F. B., Ang T., and Wu X. F., “Divergent Synthesis of Chiral δ−Boryl Ketones via Copper−Catalyzed Carbonylative 1,4 – Borylallylation,” ACS Catalysis 15, no. 20 (2025): 17614–17624, 10.1021/acscatal.5c06593. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Yuan Y., Zhang Y. C., and Wu X. F., “Enantioselective Synthesis of γ—Chiral Amides via Copper—Catalyzed Reductive Relay Hydroaminocarbonylation,” Nature Communications 15 (2024): 6705, 10.1038/s41467-024-51048-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Zhao D., Fañanás‐Mastral M., Chang M.‐C., Otten E., and Feringa B. L., “Asymmetric Synthesis of N,O‐heterocycles via Enantioselective Iridium‐Catalysed Intramolecular Allylic Amidation,” Chemical Science 5 (2014): 4216–4220, 10.1039/C4SC01940G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Li C., Xiang X., Zhang X., He Z.‐L., Gu S.‐X., and Dong X.‐Q., “Iridium‐Catalyzed Intramolecular Asymmetric Allylation of Vinyl Benzoxazinones for the Synthesis of Chiral 4H‐3,1‐benzoxazines via Kinetic Resolution,” Organic Letters 25 (2023): 1172–1177, 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c00148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Park S., Myeong I.‐S., and Ham W.‐H., “Recent Advances in the Total Synthesis of Polyhydroxylated Alkaloids via Chiral Oxazines,” Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry 22 (2024): 894–926, 10.1039/D3OB01624B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Cook G. R. and Shanker P. S., “Palladium‐Catalyzed Formation and Stereoselective Isomerization of 5‐Vinyloxazolines. Application to the Formal Synthesis of (S,S)‐4‐Amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐phenylpentanoic Acid,” Tetrahedron Letters 39 (1998): 3405–3408, 10.1016/S0040-4039(98)00534-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Lee K.‐Y., Kim Y.‐H., Park M.‐S., and Ham W.‐H., “A Highly Stereocontrolled Asymmetric Synthesis of the Taxol C‐13 Side Chain; (4S, 5R)‐2,4‐Diphenyloxazoline‐5‐carboxylic Acid,” Tetrahedron Letters 39 (1998): 8129–8132, 10.1016/S0040-4039(98)01804-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Cook G. R., Shanker P. S., and Peterson S. L., “Asymmetric Synthesis of the Balanol Heterocycle via a Palladium‐Mediated Epimerization and Olefin Metathesis,” Organic Letters 1 (1999): 615–618, 10.1021/ol990705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Lee K.‐Y., Kim Y.‐H., Park M.‐S., Oh C.‐Y., and Ham W.‐H., “Stereoselective Intramolecular Cyclization of Allyl and Homoallyl Benzamide via π‐Allylpalladium Complex Catalyzed by Pd(0),” The Journal of Organic Chemistry 64 (1999): 9450–9458, 10.1021/jo991065r. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Joo J.‐E., Lee K.‐Y., Pham V.‐T., Tian Y.‐S., and Ham W.‐H., “Application of Pd(0)‐catalyzed Intramolecular Oxazine Formation to the Efficient Total Synthesis of (−)‐anisomycin,” Organic Letters 9 (2007): 3627–3630, 10.1021/ol701519b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Wang Y.‐F., Chen H., Zhu X., and Chiba S., “Copper‐catalyzed Aerobic Aliphatic C−H Oxygenation Directed by an Amidine Moiety,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 134 (2012): 11980, 10.1021/ja305833a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Ardkhean R. U., Roth P. M., Maksymowicz R. M., et al., “Enantioselective Conjugate Addition Catalyzed by a Copper Phosphoramidite Complex: Computational and Experimental Exploration of Asymmetric Induction,” ACS Catalysis 7 (2017): 6729–6737, 10.1021/acscatal.7b01453. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Smith C. R. and RajanBabu T. V., “Efficient, Selective, and Green: Catalyst Tuning for Highly Enantioselective Reactions of Ethylene,” Organic Letters 10 (2008): 1657–1659, 10.1021/ol800395m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Huang H., Liu X., Zhou L., Chang M., and Zhang X., “Direct Asymmetric Reductive Amination for the Synthesis of Chiral β‐Arylamines,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 55 (2016): 5309–5312, 10.1002/anie.201601025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Shintani R., Park S., Duan W.‐L., and Hayashi T., “Palladium‐Catalyzed Asymmetric [3+ +3] Cycloaddition of Trimethylenemethane Derivatives With Nitrones,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 46 (2007): 5901–5903, 10.1002/anie.200701529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Mistry N. and Fletche S. P., “Phosphoramidite Ligands Based on Simple 1,2‐Diols: Synthesis, Use in Copper‐Catalyzed Asymmetric Additions, and Achirotopic Stereogenic Phosphorus Centres,” Advanced Synthesis & Catalysis 358 (2016): 2489–2496, 10.1002/adsc.201600368. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Chen W., Ren J., Wang M., et al., “Iodine Mediated Deprotection of N‐tert‐butanesulfinyl Amines: A Functional Group Compatible Method,” Chemical Communications 50 (2014): 6259–6262, 10.1039/C4CC00958D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wang C. J. and Calabrese J. C., “Decarboxylative Cyclization of Allylic Cyclic Carbamates: Applications to the Total Synthesis of (−)‐Codonopsine,” The Journal of Organic Chemistry 56 (1991): 4341–4343, 10.1021/jo00014a004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Wang Y.‐F., Chen H., Zhu X., and Chiba S., “Copper‐Catalyzed Aerobic Aliphatic C–H Oxygenation Directed by an Amidine Moiety,” Journal of the American Chemical Society 134 (2012): 11980, 10.1021/ja305833a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional supporting information can be found online in the Supporting Information section. Additional references cited within the Supporting Information [39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46].
Supporting File 1:chem71046‐sup‐0002‐SuppMat.pdf.
Supporting File 2: chem71046‐sup‐0002‐Data.zip.
