Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2026 Apr 29;15(26):e04884. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202504884

A Long‐Lived Human Neurovascular PENTA Culture Model Captures Incomplete Vascular Repair and Glia‐Associated Signaling After Traumatic Brain Injury

Daniel S Hinrichsen 1, Sunghyun Jun 1, Colleen M Arrasmith 1, Charitha C Anamala 1, Mitchell D Thielen 1, Anapaula Garcia 1, Volha Liaudanskaya 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC13356571  NIHMSID: NIHMS2175576  PMID: 42051203

ABSTRACT

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) frequently leads to chronic neurovascular dysfunction, yet mechanistic insights into human‐specific responses have been limited by the absence of long‐term, multicellular in vitro models. Here, we report a five‐cell‐type human neurovascular culture system, comprising endothelial cells, astrocytes, pericytes, microglia, and neurons, engineered within a 3D scaffold to study injury‐induced remodeling over multiple weeks. This PENTA‐culture platform captures key structural and molecular features of the neurovascular unit and supports compartment‐resolved profiling of vascular and neuroimmune responses. Under baseline conditions, PENTA cultures exhibit restricted tracer distribution relative to simpler culture configurations, consistent with the emergence of barrier‐like properties within the 3D scaffold. Following mechanical trauma, cultures exhibit a biphasic response characterized by acute endothelial disorganization, mitochondrial structural changes, and neuroimmune alterations, followed by delayed and incomplete structural recovery, accompanied by shifts in angiogenic and immunomodulatory signaling consistent with Tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin‐like epidermal growth factor‐like domains 2 (Tie2)‐ and Janus kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK/STAT)‐associated signatures. At last, the inclusion of microglia and neurons is associated with improved cytokine resolution and partial recovery of junctional organization, highlighting the influence of neuroimmune complexity on post‐injury vascular remodeling. Together, this long‐lived, human‐derived platform provides a structurally complex and functionally informative system for characterizing neurovascular injury signatures following TBI.

Keywords: neurovascular unit, traumatic brain injury, vascularized 3D brain model


A long‐lived, five‐cell‐type human neurovascular (PENTA) model recreates vascular disorganization and incomplete repair after traumatic brain injury (TBI). By integrating endothelial, glial, neuronal, and immune components within a 3D scaffold, the platform enables time‐resolved analysis of neurovascular remodeling and provides a human‐relevant system for studying vascular dysfunction in neurodegeneration.

graphic file with name ADHM-15-0-g001.jpg

1. Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) affects more than 69 million individuals globally each year and remains a major cause of long‐term neurological disability [1, 2, 3]. While acute injury symptoms, such as edema, hemorrhage, and neuronal damage, often receive immediate clinical attention, it is the delayed secondary injury cascade that drives progressive cognitive decline, psychiatric disorders, and neurodegeneration [3, 4]. This cascade, which unfolds over days to months, involves blood‐brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, chronic inflammation, glial activation, and impaired metabolic signaling [5, 6, 7]. Repetitive mild TBIs, common in military personnel and athletes, further exacerbate these outcomes and are strongly linked to the development of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) [8, 9, 10, 11]. Vascular dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a central initiator and amplifier of these processes, underscoring the need for mechanistic insight into the cellular interfaces that regulate brain homeostasis after injury [12, 13, 14]. The multifaceted nature of TBI, encompassing both immediate and delayed effects, underscores its significance as a public health challenge and a critical area of study in biomedical engineering.

At the core of this interface lies the neurovascular unit (NVU), an integrated assembly of endothelial cells, pericytes, astrocytes, neurons, and microglia that governs cerebral blood flow, BBB selectivity, and neuroimmune responses [3, 5, 15, 16, 17]. The NVU dynamically adapts to local metabolic demand and neural activity, but is highly vulnerable to mechanical and inflammatory insults [13, 14, 17, 18]. Following TBI, NVU disruption compromises barrier integrity and intercellular communication, propagating neuroinflammatory and degenerative cascades [5, 15, 18, 19, 20]. While existing preclinical models, particularly rodent systems, have provided foundational insights into these events, their translational relevance is limited by interspecies differences in brain structure and immune signaling [9, 20, 21, 22, 23]. In vitro models, including transwell co‐cultures and 3D endothelial scaffolds, offer valuable platforms for mechanistic studies and molecular screening, but often lack long‐term stability, vascular fidelity, or the full complement of NVU cell types [24, 25, 26, 27].

Here, we present a modular, vascularized 3D human brain model incorporating all five principal NVU cell types (“PENTA” cultures) to examine vascular remodeling and neuroimmune responses following moderate TBI. Built on a silk‐based scaffold optimized for extracellular matrix composition and cellular density, PENTA cultures maintain a sustained vessel‐like architecture and tight‐junction‐associated protein expression over extended culture periods. In addition to structural features, these multicellular constructs exhibit restricted tracer distribution relative to simpler configurations, consistent with the development of barrier‐like properties within the 3D scaffold.

By combining defined vascular and neuroimmune components with a controlled cortical impact paradigm, we observed a biphasic injury response characterized by early endothelial disorganization and mitochondrial structural changes, followed by delayed and incomplete structural recovery. Cytokine profiling indicated shifts in chemokine‐mediated signaling and enrichment of JAK/STAT‐ and Tie2‐associated angiogenic signatures, patterns that align with molecular features reported in in vivo TBI studies. At last, we observed that inclusion of neurons and microglia was associated with modulation of the post‐injury secretome and partial restoration of junction‐associated organization, underscoring the influence of multicellular neuroimmune complexity on vascular remodeling dynamics.

Together, this long‐lived, human‐derived platform provides a structurally complex and functionally informative system for studying neurovascular injury signatures and for generating testable hypotheses related to vascular repair and therapeutic targeting in TBI and related neurodegenerative conditions.

2. Results

2.1. Cellular Density is Critical in the Formation of Vessel‐Like Structures

To address the overarching goal of engineering vascularized human brain tissue constructs, we first evaluated the role of endothelial cell density in promoting the formation of stable, vessel‐like networks, via assessment of the ability of human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMECs) to self‐organize into anatomically relevant/similar networks in the absence of other cell types.

As shown in Figure 1A, cultures with 0.5, 1, or 2 million GFP‐expressing hBMECs were monitored weekly using epifluorescence microscopy to assess viability and large‐scale endothelial organization within the scaffold. At week 1, all three cell densities exhibited comparable network‐like structures, characterized by branched morphologies and interconnected endothelial cords. However, as shown in Figure S1A, by week 2, the lowest density group (0.5 million) displayed substantial regression of vascular‐like organization, while 1 and 2 million cell culture densities maintained visibly intact networks. Confocal images, seen in Figure 1B, demonstrated elongated CD31+ and GFP+ vessel‐like structures present at 2 weeks after seeding. Shown in Figure S1B, endothelial network organization metrics (collected using AngioTool), including lacunarity, junction density, and average vessel length, did not differ significantly across cell seeding density conditions. By week 5, none of the groups retained long‐term vascular‐like structural integrity, indicating that endothelial cells alone are insufficient for chronic vascular development and maintenance, as shown in Figure 1A,B and Figure S2.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Cellular density regulates short‐term vascular network formation but is insufficient for long‐term maintenance in endothelial monocultures. GFP‐labeled human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMECs) were seeded into collagen I‐embedded silk scaffolds at three initial densities (0.5, 1, or 2 million cells) and maintained in culture for up to 5 weeks (W1–W5). Vascular morphology was monitored weekly using epifluorescence microscopy (A), Scale bar, 500 µm. Confocal immunofluorescence imaging was performed at selected timepoints to evaluate tight junction and endothelial markers (e.g., CD31, Claudin‐5) (B), Scale bar 200 µm. Western blot analysis was used to assess protein expression levels of Claudin‐5 (C) and CD31 at week 10 (D). These data represent three independent experiments with two to four biological replicates per condition. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test.

To further corroborate epifluorescent images, we performed a comparison of protein expression levels between density conditions using a Western blot. Figure 1C depicts CD31 protein expression (CD31 levels were normalized to the 0.5 million hBMEC condition within each experiment). For the 1 million hBMEC per scaffold seeding condition, CD31 levels did not differ at 2 or 4 weeks but decreased significantly by 10 weeks (p < 0.05). For the 2 million cells group, CD31 levels were modestly reduced at 2 weeks compared to the 0.5 million group, and significantly increased from 2 to 4 weeks. In the 1 million hBMEC per scaffold condition, claudin‐5 levels were significantly increased at 10 weeks compared to both earlier timepoints as well as the 0.5 million hBMEC per scaffold condition average (p < 0.0001) (Figure 1D). In the 2 million hBMEC per scaffold condition, claudin‐5 levels were significantly increased at 10 weeks compared to the 0.5 million condition average (p < 0.05).

These data suggest that endothelial cells potentially can form transient, short‐lived vessel‐like networks; however, additional support, such as extracellular matrix or neurovascular cell types, is likely required for long‐term maintenance. Based on overall structural stability and protein expression trends, the 1 million cell condition was selected as the baseline control for downstream co‐culture optimization studies.

2.2. Extracellular Matrix Accelerates Early Vascular Assembly but Fails to Sustain Long‐Term Endothelial Stability

Following the investigation of hBMEC seeding density, we next hypothesized that the extracellular matrix (ECM) plays a critical role in promoting the formation, organization, and early maintenance of brain vascular‐like networks. To test this, we evaluated four ECM proteins frequently associated with cerebrovascular development and in vitro endothelial culture: collagen type IV (the predominant basement membrane collagen in the brain), fibronectin and laminin (two key adhesion and signaling molecules found in the brain extracellular niche), and Matrigel (a complex ECM derived from murine sarcoma, rich in laminin, collagen IV, and growth factors). As a negative control, we included scaffolds seeded with one million hBMECs and containing collagen type I without any additional ECM supplementation.

GFP+ hBMEC monocultures with extracellular matrix‐supplemented (Collagen IV, fibronectin, laminin, or Matrigel) hydrogels were monitored weekly using epifluorescence microscopy to assess cell viability and overall endothelial organization within the scaffold (Figure 2; Figures S3 and S4). These longitudinal observations were intended to evaluate the capacity of endothelial cells to assemble into network‐like patterns over time rather than to assess lumen formation or barrier function. As seen in Figure 2A, both the unsupplemented hydrogel and the Matrigel‐supplemented condition exhibit interconnected GFP‐positive structures with branched morphology at 2 and 4 weeks. Confocal images, shown in Figure 2B and Figure S4, demonstrate the presence of elongated CD31+ and GFP+ tube‐like structures at 2 weeks after seeding.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Extracellular matrix composition supports acute vascular‐like network formation but does not prevent long‐term structural decline in hBMEC monocultures. GFP‐labeled human brain microvascular endothelial cells (hBMECs) were seeded at 1 million cells per scaffold and cultured with different extracellular matrix (ECM) supplements: collagen IV, fibronectin, laminin, or Matrigel incorporated into collagen I. Cultures without additional ECM served as negative controls. (A) Epifluorescent images of GFP‐labeled hBMECs seeded with Matrigel, including or excluding ECM supplementation, at 2 and 4 weeks after seeding. Scale bar, 500 µm. (B) Confocal immunofluorescence images of scaffolds fixed 2 weeks after seeding. DAPI (405), hBMEC‐produced GFP (488), CD31 (594), and ZO1 (647). Scale bar, 200 µm. (C) CD31 comparison of hBMEC scaffold monocultures without ECM supplementation to scaffolds supplemented with laminin, collagen IV, fibronectin, and Matrigel, normalized to the unsupplemented condition. (D) Claudin‐5 comparison of hBMEC scaffold monocultures without ECM supplementation to scaffolds supplemented with laminin, collagen IV, fibronectin, and Matrigel, normalized to the unsupplemented condition. These data represent three independent experiments with two to four biological replicates per condition. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test.

To complement the morphological observations obtained by epifluorescence and confocal imaging, we performed Western blot analysis to assess endothelial and tight junction protein expression. As shown in Figure 2C, CD31 levels were quantified and normalized to the unsupplemented hydrogel condition. At 2 weeks, CD31 expression was elevated across all ECM conditions, with significant increases observed in the collagen IV and fibronectin groups (p < 0.05). At 4 weeks, CD31 levels remained higher in all ECM conditions, reaching statistical significance in the laminin and fibronectin groups (p < 0.05). By 10 weeks, CD31 expression had stabilized and was comparable across conditions. In contrast, claudin‐5 expression remained relatively consistent across ECM groups throughout the culture period, with no clear ECM‐dependent shifts detected at any time point (Figure 2D).

Based on its consistent performance and composition, encompassing collagen IV, laminin, and fibronectin, Matrigel was selected as the ECM supplement for all subsequent co‐culture experiments.

2.3. Glial Co‐Culture Sustains the Survival and Complexity of the Vascular Network in Engineered Neurovascular Tissues

After evaluating ECM effects, we next examined the co‐culture of hBMECs with astrocytes and pericytes, two established contributors to vascular maturation and homeostasis. We hypothesized that hBMEC monocultures may not sustain durable vessel‐like organization over extended culture periods and that inclusion of glial support could influence long‐term structural stability. To test this, we established co‐cultures of hBMECs with astrocytes (EA), pericytes (EP), or both (EPA), with and without Matrigel supplementation (EA[m], EP[m], EPA[m]), and maintained them for up to 10 weeks. Endothelial media were supplemented with astrocyte growth factors to support glial viability. Because ECM experiments did not identify a clearly superior condition, both Matrigel‐supplemented and non‐supplemented groups were retained to evaluate their relative effects on vascular organization and longevity.

Immunofluorescence demonstrated sustained endothelial presence and organized vessel‐like morphology in co‐cultures, particularly in EPA and EPA[m], where CD31+ and Claudin‐5+ structures were observed through week 10 (Figure 3A; Figure S5). Western blot analysis showed a modest but significant reduction in CD31 at week 2 in EA, EPA, and EPA[m] conditions (p < 0.05), consistent with early structural remodeling in the presence of glial cells (Figure 3B). Claudin‐5 levels (Figure 3C) remained largely stable across conditions, while ZO‐1 expression (Figure 3D) was elevated in glial co‐cultures relative to monoculture, suggesting alterations in junction‐associated protein organization.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Optimization of neurovascular co‐culture combinations reveals that tri‐culture of endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytes (EPA) supports the most stable and mature vascular networks. Confocal microscopy of vascular unit co‐culture. E—human brain microvascular endothelial cells, P—human brain microvascular pericytes, and A—human astrocytes. (A) Confocal immunofluorescence images of scaffolds fixed 2 weeks (left) and 10 weeks (right) after seeding for each condition. DAPI (405), hBMEC‐produced GFP (488), CD31 (594), and ZO1 (647). Scale bars, 200 µm. (C‐D) Western blot protein analysis of vascular unit co‐cultures. E—hBMECs, P—brain microvascular pericytes, A—astrocytes, NC—negative control, hBMEC monoculture pooled across timepoints, PC—positive control, hBMEC monoculture with Matrigel pooled across timepoints. (B) CD31 comparison of NC scaffold monocultures to EA, EP, and EPA co‐culture conditions, normalized to the pooled NC. (C) Claudin‐5 comparison of NC scaffold monocultures to EA, EP, and EPA co‐culture conditions, normalized to the pooled NC. (D) ZO1 comparison of NC scaffold monocultures to EA, EP, and EPA co‐culture conditions, normalized to the pooled NC. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test.

Morphometric analysis supported these observations: EPA[m] exhibited higher junction density and greater average vessel segment length at week 10 compared to other conditions (Figures S5 and S6A–C). Collectively, these findings are consistent with a role for astrocytes and pericytes in supporting vascular‐like organization within this 3D system, with Matrigel supplementation associated with further structural refinement. This multicellular configuration establishes a framework for modeling longer‐term neurovascular interactions in vitro.

2.4. Incorporation of Neuronal and Microglial Components Enhances Vascular Integration and Network Longevity in 3D Neurovascular Constructs

Having established that astrocytes and pericytes improve vascular stability, we next sought to further approximate the cellular complexity of the human neurovascular unit by incorporating neuronal and microglial components to generate five‐cell‐type constructs (“PENTA” cultures). As shown in Figure 4A, NAM triculture‐seeded silk scaffolds were embedded in a 3 mg/mL collagen I hydrogel supplemented with one million GFP‐labeled hBMECs and 0.3 million pericytes per scaffold. Constructs were transferred to 48‐well plates the following day and maintained in NAM‐compatible media enriched with B27, Glutamax, Astrocyte Growth Factors, and Anti‐Anti. No additional media optimization was required to support long‐term co‐culture of all five cell types.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Vascularized 3D in vitro brain‐like tissue (penta‐cultures) model fabrication. (A) Schematic Representation of PENTA‐cultures fabrication; (B) Representative bright field images of vascular growth over 5 weeks; (C) Representative IF images of dendritic networks (MAP2), astrocytic (GFAP), vascular (CD31), pericytic (PDGF), and microglial (TMEM119) markers, 5‐weeks post‐seeding of penta‐cultures. (D) Additional representative IF images of glial markers for astrocytes (GFAP), pericytes (PDGFRB), and microglia (CX3CR1), 5 weeks post‐seeding of penta‐cultures. (E) WB results of PENTA cultures compared to Endothelial (E) Pericytes (P) Astrocytes (A) triculture without neuronal population and non‐vascularized neuronal cultures containing Neurons (N) Astrocytes (A) and Microglia (M), normalized to the average of the EPA group for each marker. Cell‐specific markers were assessed, including Aquaporin‐4 (astrocytes), PDGFRB (pericytes), CD31 (hBMECs), TMEM119 (microglia), and Tuj1 (neurons). Each marker was normalized to the total membrane protein load of its respective sample. (F) Perfusion assay heatmap and quantifications following injection of 6‐week‐old PENTA and NAM scaffolds with Trypan blue. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test.

As shown in Figure 4B–D, PENTA constructs developed dense, spatially organized neurovascular‐like assemblies by week 5, with endothelial structures closely interwoven with neuronal and glial elements. Immunofluorescence imaging demonstrated spatial proximity of endothelial markers (CD31), neuronal markers (TUJ1), and GFAP‐positive glial cells within shared scaffold domains. Western blot analysis confirmed persistence of endothelial‐associated proteins, including CD31, within the multicellular context (Figure 4F), supporting maintenance of vascular identity over time.

To compare tracer diffusion between vascularized (PENTA) and non‐vascular (NAM) constructs and to further evaluate diffusion‐related functional properties of the vascular‐like unit, we performed distal injections of Trypan blue and fluorescent dextran and quantified tracer distribution within the scaffolds (Figure 4F; Figure S7). NAM scaffolds exhibited broader and more diffuse dye dispersion over time, whereas PENTA constructs demonstrated comparatively restricted tracer spread and reduced overall fluorescence intensity. Time‐course imaging (1, 5, and 60 min) revealed progressive diffusion in both systems; however, tracer distribution remained more spatially confined in PENTA cultures. Quantitative analysis confirmed reduced dye accumulation in PENTA relative to NAM constructs (Figure 4F; Figure S7).

At last, PENTA cultures remained viable and structurally organized for at least 16 months in vitro, providing a durable and human‐relevant platform for investigating long‐term neurovascular remodeling. Consistent with structural stability, Western blot analysis comparing 5‐ and 10‐week time points demonstrated sustained expression of markers representing all five constituent cell types (Endothelial—CD31 and ZO‐1, Neuronal—TUJ1, Astrocytic—GFAP, Microlgial—CX3CR1, and pericytic—PDGFRB), with no evident loss of lineage‐associated proteins or overt shifts suggestive of dedifferentiation (Figure S8). This five‐cell‐type system offers a structurally complex and long‐lived in vitro model of the human NVU that enables investigation of neurovascular interactions and injury‐associated remodeling within a controlled 3D environment.

2.5. Molecular Maturation of the Brain Vascular Unit

To evaluate the impact of neurovascular complexity on angiogenic signaling, secreted angiokines were profiled across four culture conditions of increasing cellular composition: hBMEC monocultures, hBMEC monocultures supplemented with Matrigel, EPA tricultures, and PENTA cultures, consisting of hBMECs, astrocytes, pericytes, microglia, and induced‐neural stem cell (iNSC) derived neurons. As shown in Figure 5, hBMEC monocultures exhibited low or undetectable levels of pro‐angiogenic factors, including VEGF‐A, TGF‐β1, PDGF‐BB, and angiopoietins. The Matrigel condition demonstrated modest increases in select remodeling proteins such as TIMP‐2 and IL‐6, but did not elicit widespread angiokine expression. In the EPA co‐culture condition, elevated levels of VEGF‐A, PDGF‐BB, MCP‐1, and GM‐CSF were detected. In the PENTA culture condition, broader upregulation of MMP‐1, IL‐10, VEGF‐D, and TGF‐β1 was observed, along with increased expression of angiopoietin‐2 and chemokines, including MCP‐3, GRO, and I‐TAC, suggesting synergistic neuroimmune regulation of endothelial signaling. Individual factor plots are shown in Figures S9 and S10.

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

Increasing neurovascular complexity enhances angiogenic and signaling pathway activation in engineered brain tissue constructs. (A) Heatmap analysis of angiogenesis assay factors in the hBMEC monoculture (control), Matrigel, EPA, and PENTA co‐cultures. Angiogenic factors measured using Raybiotech Angiogenesis Array C1000. Conditions include hBMEC monocultures (1 million hBMECs per scaffold, referred to as 1 mln), BMECs embedded in Matrigel, co‐culture with astrocytes and pericytes (EPA), and a vascularized PENTA culture including neurons and microglia (PENTA). (B) Gene ontology enrichment analysis was performed to identify biological processes associated with cytokine profiles from each experimental condition. Cytokine expression data were first normalized, and differentially expressed analytes were identified. GO enrichment analysis was conducted using curated biological process annotations to assess upregulated and downregulated pathways related to vascular development, immune signaling, and cellular communication. N = 4 membranes per condition with technical duplicate markers on each membrane and at least 2 experimental replicates pooled per membrane.

Pathway enrichment analysis confirmed a stepwise activation of angiogenic and endothelial‐specific processes across the complexity gradient (Figure 5B). While Matrigel cultures modestly engaged transmembrane receptor serine/threonine kinase and SMAD pathways, these were significantly enriched only in EPA and PENTA conditions. PENTA cultures exhibited selective enrichment in pathways associated with vasculature development, protein localization to the cell surface, and positive regulation of angiogenesis, alongside suppression of immune activation programs including leukocyte migration, cytokine response, and neutrophil chemotaxis. These findings suggest that neurons and microglia not only amplify angiogenic signaling in BMECs but also fine‐tune the balance between vascular remodeling and inflammation. Collectively, the data highlight the necessity of multicellular neurovascular interactions for accurate modeling of brain‐specific angiogenesis and support the use of PENTA systems to recapitulate physiologically relevant vascular remodeling programs for disease modeling and therapeutic development.

2.6. Spatiotemporal Disorganization of Endothelial Structure and Junctional Integrity in Injured Vascular Units

To model post‐traumatic neurovascular remodeling, EPA co‐cultures were subjected to controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury of moderate intensity (6 m/s impact velocity, 3 mm diameter tip, 0.6 mm depth) and evaluated at five post‐injury timepoints: 48 h, 72 h, 7 days, 2 weeks, and 5 weeks. Injured samples (6 m/s, 3 mm impact tip), referred to as the CCI group, were compared to sham EPA co‐cultures, which received an equal duration of air exposure during the injury protocol but did not undergo mechanical injury.

Immunofluorescence staining included GFP (endothelial cytoplasm), CD31 (endothelial adhesion), TOMM20 (mitochondrial membrane), and DAPI (nuclei). To characterize endothelial structural responses following traumatic mechanical injury, EPA co‐cultures were imaged with confocal microscopy at 48 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 5 weeks post‐injury, as shown in Figure 6A. At early timepoints (48 and 72 h), GFP+ endothelial cells exhibited fragmented morphology and loss of tubular organization. TOMM20 staining showed fragmented mitochondrial structures, and overall intensity appeared diminished relative to sham. By 7 days post‐injury, endothelial cells began forming clustered aggregates. However, vascular alignment remained disorganized based on the GFP signal. By 1 week post‐injury, partial reappearance of GFP+ tubular structures and CD31 signal was observed, with similar trends continuing out to 5 weeks. Shown in Figure 6B, quantification of vascular metrics did not demonstrate significantly altered junction density, average segment length, or lacunarity at any post‐injury timepoints compared to sham. However, both lacunarity and junction density showed increased variability at 48 h post‐injury.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Time‐resolved analysis of vascular disintegration and remodeling following moderate injury in engineered EPA neurovascular constructs. Confocal microscopy of EPA moderate injury CCI and sham samples (6 m/s impact, 3mm impact tip). (A) Confocal immunofluorescence images EPA co‐culture of scaffolds fixed 48 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 5 weeks after being subject to moderate injury. DAPI (405), hBMEC‐produced GFP (488), CD31 (594), and TOMM20 (647). Scale bar, 50 µm. (B) AngioTool quantification of vascular‐like network lacunarity, junction density, and vessel length normalized to sham. (C, D) Western blot analysis of EPA moderate injury and EPA sham samples (6 m/s impact, 3mm impact tip). (C) Comparison of vascular markers including CD31, Claudin‐5, and ZO1. (D) Comparison of mitochondrial markers, including pDRP1/DRP1 ratio and neurodegeneration‐associated protein APP. Values are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test.

To evaluate vascular, mitochondrial, inflammatory, and neurodegenerative responses following injury, we performed western blot analysis of EPA cultures at multiple post‐injury timepoints (Figure 6C,D; Figure S11). CD31 expression remained largely stable, with a significant decrease observed at two weeks post‐injury, whereas Claudin‐5 showed a transient increase at 7 days. ZO‐1 expression was significantly reduced at 24 and 72 h, consistent with early junctional disruption. Protein‐level markers associated with mitochondrial dynamics were altered post‐injury, as reflected by an increased pDRP1/DRP1 ratio at 24 h and 7 days. TOMM20 expression remained unchanged across timepoints, consistent with stable mitochondrial content at the protein level.

Next, inflammatory signaling was modest. IL‐1β levels did not change significantly, whereas the phosphorylated MLKL/MLKL ratio, a marker of necroptosis, increased at both 24 h and 7 days, indicating injury‐induced necroptotic signaling. While neurodegenerative markers revealed limited change in TDP‐43 expression, APP levels were more variable, elevated at 24 h and significantly reduced by 48 h, suggesting acute regulation following injury.

Together, these findings demonstrate that moderate injury induces sustained endothelial disorganization and junctional breakdown in EPA cultures, mimicking key features of neurovascular pathology observed in vivo following traumatic brain injury [28]. The delayed or absent reconstitution of ZO‐1 suggests long‐term deficits in BBB‐like function, reinforcing the relevance of multicellular human in vitro models for studying cerebrovascular dysfunction after TBI.

2.7. Persistent Pro‐Inflammatory and Chemokine‐Driven Signaling Dominates Long‐Term Vascular Response in Injured EPA Neurovascular Cultures

To assess how limited neurovascular complexity affects angiogenic and inflammatory signaling after injury, we profiled secreted factors in EPA cultures using a RayBiotech C1000 cytokine array (Figure 7; Individual factor plots shown in Figures S12 and S13). At 24 h post‐injury, pathway enrichment analysis revealed downregulation of receptor tyrosine kinase signaling cascades, including MAPK and JAK‐STAT pathways, alongside reduced levels of angiogenic and pro‐survival mediators such as VEGF family members, PLGF, bFGF, and TGF‐β1. These changes corresponded with diminished enrichment for canonical angiogenesis pathways.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Temporal reprogramming of angiogenic and inflammatory signaling in injured EPA cultures following traumatic brain injury. Gene ontology enrichment analysis of EPA moderate injury and EPA sham samples (6 m/s impact, 3mm impact tip). Factors measured using a Raybiotech Angiogenesis Array C1000. Samples collected at 24 h and 2 weeks post‐injury were normalized to sham signals. N = 3 sham, N = 4 CCI membranes with technical duplicate markers on each membrane and 3 experimental replicates pooled per membrane. Color‐coded false discovery rate (FDR) depicting gradient from purple (highest likelihood of false discovery, max 3.0 e‐7) to yellow (lowest likelihood of false discovery, min 1.0 e‐12).

By 14 days post‐injury, the secretome shifted toward a pro‐inflammatory profile, with increased secretion of MCP‐1, GRO, IFN‐γ, and angiogenin. Pathway analysis indicated upregulation of immune‐related programs, including neutrophil and myeloid cell migration, leukocyte chemotaxis, and SMAD signaling. Despite slight increases in VEGF‐A and TGF‐β1, angiogenic signaling remained limited, and anti‐angiogenic factors such as angiostatin and IL‐2 persisted.

At last, by 5 weeks, inflammatory cytokines, including GRO, IL‐8, and IL‐6, remained elevated, while angiogenic mediators such as bFGF and VEGF showed no reactivation. Enrichment of chemokine signaling, antimicrobial responses, and LPS‐like cytokine activation suggested persistent inflammatory activity without vascular regeneration.

These findings indicate that EPA cultures exhibit sustained inflammatory remodeling without re‐engagement of angiogenic programs, likely reflecting the absence of neuroimmune regulatory inputs required for resolution and repair.

2.8. Neuroimmune Interactions Promote Partial Vascular Repair but Fail to Resolve Endothelial and Mitochondrial Dysfunction Following Brain Injury

To assess how neurovascular complexity influences cerebrovascular injury responses, we subjected human PENTA cultures, comprising endothelial cells, astrocytes, pericytes, neurons, and microglia, to moderate mechanical trauma (6 m/s impact velocity, 3 mm tip, 0.6 mm depth) and analyzed structural and molecular changes at 24 h and 14 days post‐injury. Immunofluorescence revealed acute endothelial disorganization, characterized by fragmented GFP+ structures, reduced CD31 and ZO‐1 signal intensity, and disrupted Claudin‐5 expression (Figure 8A,B; Figure S14). By 14 days, partial recovery of endothelial architecture was observed, including reformation of GFP+ tubular networks and re‐expression of CD31 and Claudin‐5. However, ZO‐1 localization remained sparse, and vessel metrics did not return to baseline, indicating persistent barrier dysfunction. APP and TDP‐43 levels remained elevated, and pericyte coverage and segment length remained reduced, consistent with incomplete neurovascular repair (Figure 8A,B; Figure S14).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Neuronal and microglial inclusion in PENTA cultures preserves vascular integrity and shapes time‐resolved inflammatory and angiogenic responses after traumatic brain injury. Confocal Microscopy and Western Blot of PENTA moderate injury and sham samples (6 m/s impact, 3mm impact tip). (A) Confocal immunofluorescence images of scaffolds fixed 24 h and 14 days after being subject to moderate injury. CD31 (405), hBMEC‐produced GFP (488), TDP43 (594), and Tuj1 (647). Scale bar, 200 µm. (B) Western blot analysis of PENTA moderate injury and sham samples (6 m/s impact, 3mm impact tip): vascular markers (CD31, Claudin‐5, and ZO1); cell type markers (PDGFRß, CX3CR1, and AQ4); mitochondrial markers (pDRP1/DRP1 ratio and TOMM20); neuron‐associated proteins (Tuj1, TDP43, and APP). (C) Tuj1 network quantification via MATLAB, normalized to sham and AngioTool quantification of vascular‐like network lacunarity, junction density, and vessel length normalized to sham. (D) Gene ontology enrichment analysis of PENTA moderate injury and sham samples (6 m/s impact, 3mm impact tip). Factors measured using a Raybiotech Angiogenesis Array C1000. Samples collected at 24 h and 2 weeks post‐injury were normalized to sham signals. N = 3 sham, N = 4 CCI membranes with technical duplicate markers on each membrane, and 3 experimental replicates pooled per membrane. Color‐coded false discovery rate (FDR) depicting gradient from purple (highest likelihood of false discovery, max 3.0 e‐5) to yellow (lowest likelihood of false discovery, min 1.0 e‐12). Values are presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 by one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test.

To evaluate protein‐level changes associated with vascular integrity, inflammation, mitochondrial structural dynamics, and neurodegeneration in penta cultures, we performed western blot analysis at 24 h and 14 days post‐injury. Vascular markers exhibited dynamic regulation across timepoints. CD31 expression increased at both time points, with a statistically significant elevation at 14 days. Claudin‐5 remained stable at 24 h but was significantly upregulated at 14 days compared to both sham and injured cultures at 24 h. In contrast, ZO‐1 was transiently elevated at 24 h and returned to baseline by 14 days, indicating early tight junction reorganization followed by partial stabilization.

Cell type‐associated markers reflected injury‐responsive shifts. Platelet‐derived growth factor receptor beta (PDGFRβ), a marker of pericytes and endothelial cells, was significantly elevated at 24 h but returned to sham levels by 14 days. CX3C chemokine receptor 1 (CX3CR1), a microglia‐associated marker, showed a similar transient increase at 24 h. Aquaporin‐4 (AQP4), a water channel expressed by astrocytes, remained unchanged across timepoints. Neuronal markers displayed time‐dependent modulation. β3‐tubulin (Tuj1) was significantly increased at 24 h but normalized by 14 days. Amyloid precursor protein (APP) levels were unchanged. Still, they showed increased variability, while TAR DNA‐binding protein 43 (TDP‐43) trended downward at 24 h and upward at 14 days, suggesting potential early suppression and delayed accumulation of neurodegenerative markers.

At last, analysis of mitochondrial‐associated protein markers revealed a significant increase in TOMM20 at 24 h, followed by a decrease below sham levels at 14 days. The ratio of phosphorylated dynamin‐related protein 1 to total DRP1 (pDRP1/DRP1) showed increased variability, with a non‐significant trend toward elevation at 14 days, consistent with changes in markers associated with mitochondrial dynamics.

2.9. Neuroimmune Complexity Drives a Biphasic Shift From Vascular Inflammation to Reparative Signaling Following Traumatic Brain Injury

To investigate the temporal dynamics of angiogenic and inflammatory signaling after traumatic brain injury in a multicellular human neurovascular model, we profiled the secretome of PENTA cultures, comprising endothelial cells, astrocytes, pericytes, microglia, and neurons, at 24 h and 14 days post‐injury (Figure 8, Individual factor plots shown in Figures S15 and S16).

Analysis of secreted factors revealed a biphasic response. At 24 h, the profile was dominated by pro‐inflammatory and angiogenic mediators, including vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF‐A), interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), monocyte chemoattractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1), matrix metalloproteinase‐1 (MMP‐1), C‐C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases‐2 (TIMP‐2), alongside increased expression of the endothelial markers Tie‐2 and PECAM‐1, consistent with early vascular destabilization and immune activation. Elevated levels of IL‐1α, IL‐1β, and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) further reflected an acute pro‐inflammatory state. By 14 days, the secretome shifted toward a reparative phenotype. Pro‐inflammatory cytokines declined, while interleukin‐10 (IL‐10), transforming growth factor‐beta 1 (TGF‐β1), granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF), granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) were upregulated, indicating immune modulation and a transition toward endothelial repair and tissue remodeling.

Pathway enrichment analysis supported this progression: early responses were associated with immune activation, IL‐6 signaling, and apoptosis, while later timepoints showed enrichment for JAK‐STAT signaling, growth hormone and GM‐CSF receptor pathways, and chemokine‐mediated cell migration.

These results demonstrate that PENTA cultures recapitulate key features of post‐traumatic vascular remodeling, transitioning from acute endothelial activation and cytokine‐driven inflammation to a late‐phase reparative program shaped by multicellular neuroimmune interactions. Individual factor plots are shown in Figures S15 and S16.

3. Discussion

The development of our long‐lived, human‐derived PENTA‐culture neurovascular model marks a significant advancement in in vitro modeling of the NVU. By incorporating five major cell types,hBMECs, pericytes, astrocytes, microglia, and neurons, into a 3D scaffold, we have achieved a structurally and functionally complex system that captures key aspects of NVU physiology and pathology. Unlike traditional monoculture, endothelial‐glia triculture, or even advanced microfluidic BBB platforms, the PENTA model enables extended co‐culture beyond 10 weeks and provides high spatiotemporal resolution to study injury‐induced remodeling at the cellular, molecular, and secretory levels [25, 27, 29, 30].

A central advance of this model is its capacity to dissect chronic neurovascular dysfunction following TBI with cell‐type specificity. Our findings reveal that moderate mechanical injury elicits a biphasic response in PENTA cultures: an early phase of endothelial disintegration, mitochondrial changes, and glial activation, followed by a delayed and incomplete attempt at repair. These temporal patterns of protein expression and structural changes suggest coordinated but ultimately insufficient restoration of neurovascular architecture and barrier function.

Importantly, our cytokine profiling revealed injury‐induced activation of chemokine‐mediated signaling, JAK/STAT, and Tie2‐associated angiogenic pathways. These molecular signatures closely align with in vivo human and animal models of TBI and neurodegeneration [31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. However, such signaling has not been previously captured in vitro within an integrated NVU context. Enrichment of these pathways in our model, alongside sustained secretion of immune‐regulatory cytokines (G‐CSF, IL‐6, CXCL5), underscores the role of glial‐endothelial and pericyte‐microglia cross‐talk in shaping vascular remodeling and immune modulation. These results position the PENTA platform as a uniquely human‐relevant and mechanistically rich testbed for neurovascular injury and repair.

Relative to existing models, our PENTA‐culture system bridges a critical gap in NVU biology by recapitulating both injury‐responsive structural phenotypes (e.g., junctional fragmentation, altered lacunarity) and chronic signaling patterns observed in patient CSF or brain tissue [35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. Prior triculture BBB models, though valuable, lack neurons and microglia, two essential contributors to neurovascular crosstalk [29], longevity, and a full 3D environment [27]. Additionally, while models using flow systems enhance tight junction expression under physiological shear stress, they are limited in culture duration and cell‐type diversity [41, 42]. Our model, while static, incorporates dynamic elements such as mechanical injury, glial reactivity, and metabolic stress that shift the system into a remodeling state, offering a complementary and highly adaptable platform.

The modularity of the PENTA system also enabled direct comparison to simpler configurations used previously in published studies [25, 27, 30]. Endothelial monocultures and EPA cultures exhibited sustained inflammatory signaling and limited structural recovery following injury, whereas inclusion of neurons and microglia in the PENTA model was associated with improved junctional organization and altered secretome dynamics. These observations highlight the contribution of multicellular complexity to coordinated neurovascular remodeling. In addition, our analyses revealed enrichment of Tie2‐ and JAK/STAT‐associated signaling signatures following injury, consistent with angiogenic and immunomodulatory processes within the human NVU.

In conclusion, the PENTA‐culture model constitutes a transformative tool for studying human neurovascular function and pathology. It captures key mechanistic events, from vascular disintegration to incomplete repair, seen in clinical neurotrauma and neurodegeneration. Its capacity to reveal previously inaccessible glial‐vascular signaling and chronic remodeling pathways holds promise for therapeutic discovery, particularly for diseases involving vascular compromise, neuroinflammation, and long‐term barrier disruption.

4. Limitations and Future Directions

While the PENTA model enables long‐term investigation of neurovascular remodeling within a multicellular human‐derived 3D scaffold, several structural and biological limitations warrant consideration. The absence of continuous perfusion and physiological shear stress likely constrains full endothelial maturation and barrier tightening, as shear‐dependent signaling regulates junctional organization and endothelial phenotype [43, 44, 45]. This static configuration may contribute to the moderate baseline expression of tight junction proteins observed relative to flow‐based systems. Although permeability assays were performed, direct TEER measurements were not feasible due to electrode placement constraints within the macro‐scale 3D scaffold. In addition, Matrigel was used as a baseline extracellular matrix to support vascular assembly; as a tumor‐derived and compositionally complex matrix, it does not fully recapitulate the defined protein ratios of the human brain basement membrane. Transition toward fully defined or brain‐specific synthetic matrices will further enhance extracellular matrix fidelity. Future incorporation of perfusable microchannels or microfluidic‐compatible TEER platforms will strengthen functional barrier assessment.

The cellular composition of the model also reflects necessary biophysical trade‐offs rather than exact replication of in vivo NVU ratios [46]. Reproducing physiological neuronal densities within a 1.5 mm scaffold exceeds passive oxygen diffusion limits (∼150–200 µm) and would result in central hypoxia [47], while vascular self‐assembly requires a relatively higher endothelial and pericyte fraction to ensure adequate tubulogenesis [48]. Thus, the selected seeding ratios represent a compromise between physiological proportion and sustained structural integrity. Similarly, the use of immortalized HMC3 microglia prioritizes reproducibility over full transcriptional heterogeneity, though prior validation of this scaffold‐based framework demonstrated comparable injury‐associated responses relative to iPSC‐derived microglia [49, 50]. iNSC‐derived neurons in static culture also do not achieve full electrophysiological maturity [51], and therefore, the model is not designed to simulate rapid hemodynamic neurovascular coupling, but rather longer‐term paracrine‐mediated interactions among NVU cell types [52].

The present study establishes a structural, protein‐level, and secretome‐based characterization of the PENTA platform following injury. While this provides a reproducible baseline of multicellular remodeling, it does not incorporate targeted genetic or pharmacological perturbations to define causal pathway relationships. Future work will therefore focus on mechanistic interrogation of injury‐associated signaling through pathway‐specific modulation and drug screening approaches. In addition, mitochondrial assessment in this study relied on protein‐level markers; incorporation of direct metabolic measurements such as ATP production, ROS quantification, and bioenergetic profiling will provide deeper resolution of injury‐associated metabolic dysfunction.

Within this broader mechanistic refinement, deeper phenotypic resolution of glial populations represents an important next step. Astrocytes and microglia exhibit diverse and dynamic activation states following CNS injury, ranging from pro‐inflammatory to reparative phenotypes [53, 54, 55]. Integration of marker‐based and transcriptomic approaches (e.g., C3, S100A10, and single‐cell profiling) will allow resolution of astrocyte and microglial subpopulations within the PENTA system and clarify their contributions to vascular remodeling dynamics. Correlation of model‐derived molecular signatures with emerging clinical biomarker datasets will further enhance translational alignment.

Collectively, these refinements represent technical extensions of an already stable five‐cell human neurovascular framework and will enhance its physiological fidelity and predictive utility.

5. Methods

5.1. 3D Silk Scaffold Preparation

Scaffolds were fabricated using silk fibroin solution extracted from Bombyx mori cocoons, following previously established protocols [56]. Briefly, the silk cocoons were boiled in a sodium carbonate solution for 30 min to remove sericin from the fibroin. The resulting fibers were dried overnight in a chemical fume hood, then dissolved in 9.3 M lithium bromide solution. This solution was subsequently dialyzed in deionized water for three days to remove the salt. A 6% (w/v) silk fibroin solution was then cast into a round 6 cm diameter dish and mixed with sodium chloride particles ranging in size from 300 to 425 µm. After incubating for two days, the mixture was heated at 65°C for one hour to induce beta‐sheet formation, resulting in a 3D sponge. The sponge was removed from the dish and dialyzed at room temperature for two additional days to leach out the sodium chloride. Scaffolds were then cut using circular biopsy punches (McMaster‐Carr, Princeton, NJ, USA) to a final size of 6 mm outer diameter and 2 mm inner diameter, and trimmed to a height of 1.5 mm using a razor blade. This created cylindrical scaffolds of 6 mm outer diameter, a 2 mm interior window, and 1.5 mm of height. The scaffolds were sterilized by autoclaving for 20 min and stored at 4°C for up to one week prior to use.

5.2. Multicellular Engineered Brain‐Like Tissue Preparation

The protocol for generating the 3D multicellular engineered brain microvascular tissue model was adapted from the Liaudanskaya laboratory's previously published 3D human iPSC‐derived cortical neuron model [56]. Silk scaffolds, created as previously described, were coated with 0.1 mg/mL poly‐L‐lysine (PLL) at 37°C overnight, followed by a second overnight coating with 50 µg/mL laminin at 4°C. The next day, scaffolds were washed five times with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS), each wash lasting 5 min. Scaffolds were then conditioned with either neural basal (NB for PENTA cultures) or endothelial medium (for hBMEC monocultures or EPA cultures) until the isolated cells were ready for seeding.

Immediately prior to seeding, scaffolds were transferred to 96‐well plates, and all residual liquid was removed using a vacuum aspirating pipet. A 40 µL suspension containing cells at their respective densities (50 million cells/mL of neurons and 12.5 million cells/mL of astrocytes) in neurobasal or endothelial media was then applied to each dried scaffold and incubated at 37°C for 30 min to facilitate cell attachment. Following this, 150 µL of either neurobasal or endothelial medium was added to each well, and the plates were placed in a tissue culture incubator (37°C, 5% CO2, humidified atmosphere).

The next day, the cell‐seeded scaffolds were transferred to fresh 96‐well microplates, and a collagen type I hydrogel containing endothelial cells and pericytes was added to each scaffold (100 µL of 3 mg/mL collagen solution and pH adjusted to 7.0 using NaOH, 10 million cells/mL of hBMECs, and 3 million cells/mL of pericytes). After a 30‐min incubation at 37°C to allow collagen crosslinking, 150 µL of either neurobasal or endothelial medium was added to each scaffold and incubated for 24 h. On the following day, the seeded scaffolds were transferred to 48‐well plates containing 1 mL of neurobasal or endothelial medium. To support glial viability, endothelial media was supplemented with an astrocyte growth supplement in EA co‐cultures and EPA tricultures. Media was refreshed every four days until the constructs reached the assigned timepoint for fixing/freezing (2, 4, or 10 weeks for characterization) or until they were subjected to controlled cortical impact (CCI) 5–6 weeks post‐seeding.

5.3. Mechanical Contusion Injury Model

Scaffolds were mechanically injured to simulate moderate TBI through the use of a CCI device. Scaffolds were placed on sterile weigh boats within a biosafety cabinet and subjected to mechanical injury using a pneumatic CCI device in a manner similar to our group's previously published model [50, 57]. For the moderate injury paradigm, a 3 mm diameter impactor tip was employed at a velocity of 6 m/s, with an impact depth of 0.6 mm and a dwell time of 200 ms. Injuries were administered 5 weeks after scaffold seeding, with each injured sample receiving 1 hit. Sham controls were exposed to identical environmental conditions, including air exposure on the weigh boat, but did not undergo mechanical impact. Sample collection timepoints were defined relative to the injury event.

5.4. Western Blot

To compare relative levels of protein expression between groups, a Western blot was utilized. For protein extraction, whole scaffolds previously stored at −80°C were lysed by the addition of 1X RIPA buffer. Samples were then subjected to sonication at 20% amplitude for 20 pulses (1 s on, 1 s off) to facilitate protein release. The resulting lysates were diluted in a 3:1 ratio with sample buffer composed of Laemmli buffer and β‐mercaptoethanol (9:1). In addition to these lysates, mitochondrial and total protein samples were collected following Seahorse assay post‐processing. For electrophoresis, 15 µL of mitochondrial or sonicated scaffold lysates were mixed with 5 µL of sample buffer. All samples were denatured at 95°C for 5 min prior to loading onto precast acrylamide gels.

Protein separation was performed by SDS‐PAGE at 150 V for approximately 50 min, or until the tracking dye reached the bottom of the gel. Precision Plus Protein All Blue Standard (Bio‐Rad) was used as a molecular weight reference (5 µL for general samples; 10 µL for Seahorse protein samples). Gels were imaged using the Stain‐Free setting on a Bio‐Rad imager. If the sample number exceeded the capacity of a single gel, samples were divided across multiple gels. For consistency, gels were sectioned at identical molecular weight markers (75 and 20 kDa) prior to transfer to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes.

Protein transfer was performed using a semi‐dry transfer system at 2.5 V and 1.6 A for 4 min (total protein samples) or 3 min (mitochondrial samples). Following transfer, membranes were imaged using the stain‐free preset to assess total protein content for normalization purposes. Membranes underwent multiple rounds of antibody probing, imaging, and stripping to enable detection of various target proteins. Primary antibody incubation was carried out overnight at 4°C on a rocker using typical dilutions of 1:1000 in Blocking Buffer, or 1:3000 for particularly strong signals. Membranes were washed using Tris‐buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST), beginning with two immediate rinses, followed by three 10‐min washes. Secondary antibodies were applied at a 1:10 000 dilution in Blocking Buffer for 1 h at 4°C, followed by the same wash sequence. Detection was performed using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate, with membranes exposed for 5 min prior to imaging. To enable subsequent rounds of probing, membranes were stripped using Western blot stripping buffer at room temperature for 30 min, followed by the standard TBST wash protocol.

For analysis, all markers were normalized to the total protein content of their respective samples lane. Tight junction proteins are presented as (TJ protein / CD31) / total protein content. pMLKL / MLKL ratios are presented as (pMLKL / MLKL)/total protein content. pDRP1 / DRP1 ratios are presented as (pDRP1 / DRP1) / total protein content. All other markers are presented as normalized to the total protein content.

Western Blot Primary: APP Rb (Invitrogen PA5‐17829), Aqp4 Rb (Invitrogen PA5‐53234), CD31 Rb (Invitrogen PA5‐16301), Claudin‐5 Rb (Abcam ab131259), CX3CR1 Rb (Invitrogen MA5‐44973), DRP1 (DNM1L) Ms (Invitrogen MA5‐26255), MLKL (Cell Signaling 37705), PDGFRb (CD140b) Ms (Invitrogen MA5‐28128), pDRP1 (S616) Rb (Cell Signaling 3455S), pMLKL Rb (Cell Signaling 91689), TDP43 Rb (Abcam ab109535), TMEM119 (Invitrogen PA5‐119902), TOMM20 Rb (Invitrogen MA5‐24859), Tuj1 (Anti‐beta III Tubulin) Ms (Abcam ab78078), ZO1 Ms (Invitrogen 33–9100).

Western Blot Secondary: Anti‐mouse IgG, HRP‐linked (Cell Signaling 7076), anti‐rabbit IgG, HRP‐linked (Cell Signaling 7074).

5.5. Angiogenesis Assay

The RayBiotech C1000 Angiogenesis Assay was used for pathway‐level analysis by measuring 43 specific angiogenic factors. The protocol was followed as listed in the product specifications. Briefly, pre‐loaded membranes with antibodies were coated in 200–300 µg of scaffold protein lysate, with 1 mL of solution per membrane. After incubation with primary and secondary antibodies, a detection buffer was used to quantify each target factor via chemiluminescence. Factors were compared to the Gene Ontology library and assessed using STRING protein‐protein interactions [58, 59].

5.6. Tracer Permeability (Diffusion) Assay

Fluorescence‐based permeability assays were performed using Dextran Red and Trypan Blue to assess tracer distribution within the 3D scaffolds. A 10 µL volume of each tracer was injected at the periphery of the scaffold. For Trypan Blue, brightfield images were acquired at 1, 5, and 60 min post‐injection to monitor diffusion over time. For Dextran Red, samples were transferred for confocal imaging immediately following injection (approximately 5 min) to capture early spatial distribution within the construct. These approaches enabled qualitative and semi‐quantitative assessment of tracer penetration and barrier‐like properties within the multicellular system.

5.7. Confocal Microscopy

To visualize cellular morphology and the localization of proteins, confocal microscopy and immunofluorescence were used. 3D cell‐seeded scaffolds were fixed in a solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Electron Microscopy Sciences) and 4% sucrose in phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS; Thermo Fisher) for 1 h at room temperature. Following fixation, samples were washed with PBS and permeabilized for 1 h using a solution of 0.2% Triton X‐100 and 4% goat serum (Thermo Fisher). Primary antibody incubation was carried out overnight at 4°C in the same permeabilization solution. The following day, samples were gently washed five times with PBS before being incubated with fluorophore‐conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclear staining was then performed using DAPI (4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole) for 5 min. Excess antibodies and DAPI were removed by five additional PBS washes. Fluorescent image stacks of the 3D tissues were acquired using a Zeiss confocal microscope. Regions of interest were chosen blinded to the channel of quantification (avoiding GFP, CD31, and Tuj1). 50 z‐stacks were created at a 10x zoom, a resolution of 1024 × 1024 pixels (3181.98 µm × 3181.98 µm), and with a step size of 1.5 µm. Data presented as max projection of z‐stacks with combined channels. Images were uniformly altered for visual presentation in figures only, not before any analysis.

IF Primary: CD31 Ms (Invitrogen MA3100), CD31 Rb (Invitrogen PA5‐16301), CX3CR1 Rb (Invitrogen MA5‐44973), GFAP Ck (Abcam ab4674), TDP43 Rb (Abcam ab109535), TOMM20 Rb (Invitrogen MA5‐24859), Tuj1 Ck (Novus Biologicals NB100‐1612), ZO1 Ms (Invitrogen 33–9100).

IF Secondary: Goat anti‐chicken IgY (H+L) (Invitrogen A32933), goat anti‐mouse IgG (H+L) (Invitrogen A32728), goat anti‐rabbit IgG (H + L) (Invitrogen A32733).

Tuj1 neuronal network density was analyzed using a custom MATLAB code previously published by the Liaudanskaya research group [60]. Briefly, Z‐stacks of Tuj‐1–labeled 3D tissues were imported into MATLAB for analysis. Background fluorescence from silk and cell bodies was removed using Otsu's thresholding and an eccentricity filter (≥0.90) to exclude circular structures, preserving elongated, tube‐like neurites. Connected neurite voxels (defined by 18‐point connectivity; voxel dimensions = 0.258 µm × 0.258 µm × 0.422 µm) were grouped into individual objects. For each object, the longest principal axis of its best‐fit ellipsoid was used to quantify neurite length. Neural network prevalence within each stack was calculated as the percentage of voxels included in neurite length analysis relative to the total voxel count.

Vascular‐like network parameters were quantified using AngioTool, an open‐source software developed by the NIH for analysis of angiogenesis [61]. All images used for analysis were maximum intensity projections of the GFP channel and included vessels on a dark background, compatible with AngioTool's segmentation pipeline. Images were processed using a multiscale Hessian‐based enhancement filter to identify tube‐like structures, followed by skeletonization for quantitative morphometric analysis. Metrics computed included total and average vessel length, vessel area, number of junctions, vascular density, lacunarity, and branching index (branch points per unit area). Lacunarity, a measure of structural heterogeneity, was calculated using a fast box‐counting algorithm. To ensure consistency, identical scale and segmentation parameters were applied across all groups. AngioTool's processing leveraged Java‐based libraries and ImageJ plugins, allowing reproducible, high‐throughput quantification across multicore systems.

5.8. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 7. Two‐tailed t‐tests were used to compare two experimental groups. One‐way ANOVA analysis of variance was used to compare multiple groups within a single timepoint or one group across multiple timepoints. Tukey's post‐hoc test was used to evaluate significant differences between experimental groups and for comparison to controls. p ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All experiments were repeated three times to minimize in vitro variance. At the same time, due to the independent nature of each scaffold during culture, each scaffold was treated as an independent sample. Samples were normalized to the average of the negative control from their respective experimental replicate, then all experiments were combined for statistical analysis. For example, in Figure 2, corrected western blot data (CD31 normalized to total protein content on the sample lane) were divided by the average of the 0.5 million group within each experiment. All quantified data presented are the average and standard error of the mean of three independent experiments.

Author Contributions

V.L. conceived the project. D.S.H., S.J., and V.L. designed and interpreted the experiments. D.S.H. and V.L. wrote the manuscript. D.S.H. and S.J. performed scaffold seeding and sample maintenance (media changes). D.S.H. and S.J. performed all in vitro experiments and injuries; D.S.H. performed Raybiotech assays. V.L. performed confocal imaging. D.S.H., S.J., C.C.A., M.D.T., and A.G. conducted Western Blots. V.L. performed ELISA. D.S.H., S.J., C.C.A., and M.D.T. prepared silk materials. C.M.A. performed diffusion experiments and a longevity W.B. study to address reviewers’ concerns.

Funding

The authors thank the University of Cincinnati Start‐Up Funds and Research Scholar Award, NIH (1R21AG085052‐01A1).

Ethics Statement

This work did not include any experiments with animals or the participation of human subjects.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supporting information

Supporting File: adhm71192‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

ADHM-15-0-s001.docx (20.4MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Bioimaging and Analysis Facility.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Brett B. L., Gardner R. C., Godbout J., Dams‐O'Connor K., and Keene C. D., “Traumatic Brain Injury and Risk of Neurodegenerative Disorder,” Biological Psychiatry 91 (2022): 498–507, 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.05.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chauhan N. B., “Chronic Neurodegenerative Consequences of Traumatic Brain Injury,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 32 (2014): 337–365, 10.3233/rnn-130354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Jassam Y. N., Izzy S., Whalen M., McGavern D. B., and El Khoury J., “Neuroimmunology of Traumatic Brain Injury: Time for a Paradigm Shift,” Neuron 95 (2017): 1246–1265, 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Woodcock T. and Morganti‐Kossmann C., “The Role of Markers of Inflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury,” Frontiers in Neurology 4 (2013): 18, 10.3389/fneur.2013.00018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Farrell M., Aherne S., O'Riordan S., O'Keeffe E., Greene C., and Campbell M., “Blood‐Brain Barrier Dysfunction in a Boxer With Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy and Schizophrenia,” Clinical Neuropathology 38 (2019): 51–58, 10.5414/NP301130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schmitt R., Qayum S., Pliss A., et al., “Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Apoptosis in Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells following Blast Traumatic Brain Injury,” Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology 43 (2023): 3639–3651, 10.1007/s10571-023-01372-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wu Y., Wu H., Zeng J., et al., “Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Induces Microvascular Injury and Accelerates Alzheimer‐Like Pathogenesis in Mice,” Acta Neuropathologica Communications 9 (2021): 74, 10.1186/s40478-021-01178-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Gardner R. C. and Yaffe K., “Epidemiology of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurodegenerative Disease,” Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience 66 (2015): 75–80, 10.1016/j.mcn.2015.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hubbard W. B., Vekaria H. J., Velmurugan G. V., et al., “Mitochondrial Dysfunction After Repeated Mild Blast Traumatic Brain Injury is Attenuated by a Mild Mitochondrial Uncoupling Prodrug,” Journal of Neurotrauma 40 (2023): 2396–2409, 10.1089/neu.2023.0102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Priemer D. S., Iacono D., Rhodes C. H., Olsen C. H., and Perl D. P., “Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in the Brains of Military Personnel,” New England Journal of Medicine 386 (2022): 2169–2177, 10.1056/NEJMoa2203199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Siedhoff H. R., Chen S., Song H., et al., “Perspectives on Primary Blast Injury of the Brain: Translational Insights Into Non‐Inertial Low‐Intensity Blast Injury,” Frontiers in Neurology 12 (2022): 818169, 10.3389/fneur.2021.818169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Svaldi D. O., Joshi C., Robinson M. E., et al., “Cerebrovascular Reactivity Alterations in Asymptomatic High School Football Players,” Developmental Neuropsychology 40 (2015): 80–84, 10.1080/87565641.2014.973959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Salehi A., Zhang J. H., and Obenaus A., “Response of the Cerebral Vasculature Following Traumatic Brain Injury,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 37 (2017): 2320–2339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhao Z.‐A., Yan L., Wen J., et al., “Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms in Vascular Repair After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review,” Burns & Trauma 11 (2023): tkad033, 10.1093/burnst/tkad033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Ramos‐Cejudo J., Wisniewski T., Marmar C., et al., “Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer's Disease: The Cerebrovascular Link,” eBioMedicine 28 (2018): 21–30, 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.01.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Sivanandam T. M. and Thakur M. K., “Traumatic Brain Injury: A Risk Factor for Alzheimer's Disease,” Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 36 (2012): 1376–1381, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Attwell D., Buchan A. M., Charpak S., Lauritzen M., MacVicar B. A., and Newman E. A., “Glial and Neuronal Control of Brain Blood Flow,” Nature 468 (2010): 232–243, 10.1038/nature09613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Sandsmark D. K., Bashir A., Wellington C. L., and Diaz‐Arrastia R., “Cerebral Microvascular Injury: A Potentially Treatable Endophenotype of Traumatic Brain Injury‐Induced Neurodegeneration,” Neuron 103 (2019): 367–379, 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Tagge C. A., Fisher A. M., Minaeva O. V., et al., “Concussion, Microvascular Injury, and Early Tauopathy in Young Athletes After Impact Head Injury and an Impact Concussion Mouse Model,” Brain 141 (2018): 422–458, 10.1093/brain/awx350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wu L., Chung J. Y., Cao T., et al., “Genetic Inhibition of RIPK3 Ameliorates Functional Outcome in Controlled Cortical Impact Independent of Necroptosis,” Cell Death & Disease 12 (2021): 1064, 10.1038/s41419-021-04333-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lovett M. L., Nieland T. J. F., Dingle Y.‐T. L., and Kaplan D. L., “Innovations in 3D Tissue Models of Human Brain Physiology and Diseases,” Advanced Functional Materials 30 (2020): 1909146, 10.1002/adfm.201909146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hubbard W. B., Joseph B., Spry M., Vekaria H. J., Saatman K. E., and Sullivan P. G., “Acute Mitochondrial Impairment Underlies Prolonged Cellular Dysfunction After Repeated Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries,” Journal of Neurotrauma 36 (2019): 1252–1263, 10.1089/neu.2018.5990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hubbard W. B., Harwood C. L., Geisler J. G., Vekaria H. J., and Sullivan P. G., “Mitochondrial Uncoupling Prodrug Improves Tissue Sparing, Cognitive Outcome, and Mitochondrial Bioenergetics After Traumatic Brain Injury in Male Mice,” Journal of Neuroscience Research 96 (2018): 1677–1688, 10.1002/jnr.24271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Power L., Shuhmaher R., Houtz P., et al., “3D Neurovascular Unit Tissue Model to Assess Responses to Traumatic Brain Injury,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 113 (2025): 37816, 10.1002/jbm.a.37816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Minami H., Tashiro K., Okada A., et al., “Generation of Brain Microvascular Endothelial‐Like Cells From Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells by Co‐Culture With C6 Glioma Cells,” PLoS ONE 10 (2015): 0128890, 10.1371/journal.pone.0128890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Nishihara H., Gastfriend B. D., Kasap P., Palecek S. P., Shusta E. V., and Engelhardt B., “Differentiation of human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cell‐Like Cells Suitable to Study Immune Cell Interactions,” STAR Protocols 2 (2021): 100563, 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Stanton A. E., Bubnys A., Agbas E., et al., “Engineered 3D Immuno‐Glial‐Neurovascular Human miBrain Model,” preprint, BioRxiv 2024, 10.1101/2023.08.15.553453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 28. Di Giovanna A. P., Tibo A., Silvestri L., et al., “Whole‐Brain Vasculature Reconstruction at the Single Capillary Level,” Scientific Reports 8 (2018): 12573, 10.1038/s41598-018-30533-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Power L., Shuhmaher R., Houtz P., et al., “3D Neurovascular Unit Tissue Model to Assess Responses to Traumatic Brain Injury,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 113 (2025): 37816, 10.1002/jbm.a.37816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Nishihara H., Gastfriend B. D., Kasap P., Palecek S. P., Shusta E. V., and Engelhardt B., “Differentiation of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells to Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cell‐Like Cells Suitable to Study Immune Cell Interactions,” STAR Protocols 2 (2021): 100563, 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Kim H., Leng K., Park J., et al., “Reactive Astrocytes Transduce Inflammation in a Blood‐Brain Barrier Model Through a TNF‐STAT3 Signaling Axis and Secretion of Alpha 1‐antichymotrypsin,” Nature Communications 13 (2022): 6581, 10.1038/s41467-022-34412-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zlokovic B. V., “The Blood‐Brain Barrier in Health and Chronic Neurodegenerative Disorders,” Neuron 57 (2008): 178–201, 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Sweeney M. D., Zhao Z., Montagne A., Nelson A. R., and Zlokovic B. V., “Blood‐Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back,” Physiological Reviews 99 (2019): 21–78, 10.1152/physrev.00050.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yu F., Wang Y., Stetler A. R., Leak R. K., Hu X., and Chen J., “Phagocytic Microglia and Macrophages in Brain Injury and Repair,” CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 28 (2022): 1279–1293, 10.1111/cns.13899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Dumbuya J. S., Chen L., Wu J. Y., and Wang B., “The Role of G‐CSF Neuroprotective Effects in Neonatal Hypoxic‐Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE): Current Status,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 18 (2021): 55, 10.1186/s12974-021-02084-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Clark A. L., Weigand A. J., Bangen K. J., et al., “Higher Cerebrospinal Fluid tau is Associated With History of Traumatic Brain Injury and Reduced Processing Speed in Vietnam‐Era Veterans: A Department of Defense Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (DOD‐ADNI) Study,” Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring 13 (2021): 12239, 10.1002/dad2.12239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Daoud H., Alharfi I., Alhelali I., Charyk Stewart T., Qasem H., and Fraser D. D., “Brain Injury Biomarkers as Outcome Predictors in Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury,” Neurocritical Care 20 (2014): 427–435, 10.1007/s12028-013-9879-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Henry R. J., Ritzel R. M., Barrett J. P., et al., “Microglial Depletion With CSF1R Inhibitor During Chronic Phase of Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury Reduces Neurodegeneration and Neurological Deficits,” The Journal of Neuroscience 40 (2020): 2960–2974, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2402-19.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Jin W. N., Xiang‐Yu Shi S., Li Z., et al., “Depletion of Microglia Exacerbates Postischemic Inflammation and Brain Injury,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 37 (2017): 2224–2236, 10.1177/0271678x17694185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Pujol‐Calderón F., Portelius E., Zetterberg H., Blennow K., Rosengren L. E., and Höglund K., “Neurofilament Changes in Serum and Cerebrospinal Fluid After Acute Ischemic Stroke,” Neuroscience Letters 698 (2019): 58–63, 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Bolden C. T., Skibber M. A., Olson S. D., et al., “Validation and Characterization of a Novel Blood–Brain Barrier Platform for Investigating Traumatic Brain Injury,” Scientific Reports 13 (2023): 16150, 10.1038/s41598-023-43214-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Hajal C., Offeddu G. S., Shin Y., et al., “Engineered Human Blood–Brain Barrier Microfluidic Model for Vascular Permeability Analyses,” Nature Protocols 17 (2022): 95–128, 10.1038/s41596-021-00635-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Tardy Y., Resnick N., Nagel T., Gimbrone M. A., and Dewey C. F., “Shear Stress Gradients Remodel Endothelial Monolayers In Vitro via a Cell Proliferation‐Migration‐Loss Cycle,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology 17 (1997): 3102–3106, 10.1161/01.ATV.17.11.3102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Katoh K., “Effects of Mechanical Stress on Endothelial Cells In Situ and In Vitro,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 24 (2023): 16518, 10.3390/ijms242216518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Meng F., Cheng H., Qian J., Dai X., Huang Y., and Fan Y., “In Vitro Fluidic Systems: Applying Shear Stress on Endothelial Cells,” Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices 15 (2022): 100143, 10.1016/j.medntd.2022.100143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. von Bartheld C. S., Bahney J., and Herculano‐Houzel S., “The Search for True Numbers of Neurons and Glial Cells in the Human Brain: A Review of 150 Years of Cell Counting,” Journal of Comparative Neurology 524 (2016): 3865–3895, 10.1002/cne.24040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Rouwkema J., Rivron N. C., and van Blitterswijk C. A., “Vascularization in Tissue Engineering,” Trends in Biotechnology 26 (2008): 434–441, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Campisi M., Shin Y., Osaki T., Hajal C., Chiono V., and Kamm R. D., “3D Self‐Organized Microvascular Model of the Human Blood‐Brain Barrier With Endothelial Cells, Pericytes and Astrocytes,” Biomaterials 180 (2018): 117–129, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Russo D., Cappoli N., Coletta I., et al., “The Human Microglial HMC3 Cell Line: Where Do We Stand? A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Neuroinflammation 15 (2018): 259, 10.1186/s12974-018-1288-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Liaudanskaya V., Fiore N. J., Zhang Y., et al., “Mitochondria Dysregulation Contributes to Secondary Neurodegeneration Progression Post‐Contusion Injury in Human 3D In Vitro Triculture Brain Tissue Model,” Cell Death & Disease 14 (2023): 496, 10.1038/s41419-023-05980-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Di Lullo E. and Kriegstein A. R., “The Use of Brain Organoids to Investigate Neural Development and Disease,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18 (2017): 573–584, 10.1038/nrn.2017.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Iadecola C., “The Neurovascular Unit Coming of Age: A Journey Through Neurovascular Coupling in Health and Disease,” Neuron 96 (2017): 17–42, 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Loane D. J. and Kumar A., “Microglia in the TBI Brain: The Good, the Bad, and the Dysregulated,” Experimental Neurology 275 (2016): 316–327, 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.08.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Liddelow S. A., Guttenplan K. A., Clarke L. E., et al., “Neurotoxic Reactive Astrocytes are Induced by Activated Microglia,” Nature 541 (2017): 481–487, 10.1038/nature21029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Escartin C., Galea E., Lakatos A., et al., “Reactive Astrocyte Nomenclature, Definitions, and Future Directions,” Nature Neuroscience 24 (2021): 312–325, 10.1038/s41593-020-00783-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Rockwood D. N., Preda R. C., Yücel T., Wang X., Lovett M. L., and Kaplan D. L., “Materials Fabrication From Bombyx mori Silk Fibroin,” Nature Protocols 6 (2011): 1612–1631, 10.1038/nprot.2011.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Liaudanskaya V., Chung J. Y., Mizzoni C., et al., “Modeling Controlled Cortical Impact Injury in 3D Brain‐Like Tissue Cultures,” Advanced Healthcare Materials 9 (2020): 2000122, 10.1002/adhm.202000122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ashburner M., Ball C. A., Blake J. A., et al., “Gene Ontology: Tool for the Unification of Biology,” Nature Genetics 25 (2000): 25–29, 10.1038/75556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Aleksander S. A., Balhoff J., Carbon S., et al., “The Gene Ontology Knowledgebase in 2023,” Genetics 224 (2023): iyad031, 10.1093/genetics/iyad031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Liaudanskaya V., Chung J. Y., Mizzoni C., et al., “Modeling Controlled Cortical Impact Injury in 3D Brain‐Like Tissue Cultures,” Advanced Healthcare Materials 9 (2020): 2000122, 10.1002/adhm.202000122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Zudaire E., Gambardella L., Kurcz C., and Vermeren S., “A Computational Tool for Quantitative Analysis of Vascular Networks,” PLoS ONE 6 (2011): 27385, 10.1371/journal.pone.0027385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting File: adhm71192‐sup‐0001‐SuppMat.docx.

ADHM-15-0-s001.docx (20.4MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Advanced Healthcare Materials are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES